about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,337 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Arson in Florida and the second variable is Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

People were realizing that in the event of a shortage, it's important to have a backup plan for dealing with a different kind of fire situation.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [Whimsical illustration] Generate an image of a charming Florida neighborhood scene with a touch of urgency and anxiety. Show a small fire flickering in a trash can, with gentle smoke rising into the sky. People, depicted in a caricatured style, are standing in line, anxiously holding their phones and searching "where to buy toilet paper" on Google. The warm sunlight casts a golden glow over the scene, adding a whimsical touch to the urgency. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Arson in Florida and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Charcoal Cubism Whimsical illustration Surrealism Whimsical illustration
ChatGPT: Whimsical illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Arson in Florida and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper', in the following situation: Because arson in Florida caused a "hot" demand for toilet paper by scaring people into thinking they needed to "wipe out" any potential disaster. With a shortage of TP, folks had to "spark" their creativity and "fire up" their search for where to buy toilet paper.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a Florida neighborhood, smoke billows gently into the sky as a small fire flickers in a trash can. Nearby, people stand in line, holding their phones and eagerly searching "where to buy toilet paper" on Google. The sunlight casts a warm glow over the scene, adding to the sense of urgency and anxiety.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Whimsical illustration ] and depicting this scene: In a Florida neighborhood, smoke billows gently into the sky as a small fire flickers in a trash can. Nearby, people stand in line, holding their phones and eagerly searching "where to buy toilet paper" on Google. The sunlight casts a warm glow over the scene, adding to the sense of urgency and anxiety. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [Whimsical illustration] Generate an image of a charming Florida neighborhood scene with a touch of urgency and anxiety. Show a small fire flickering in a trash can, with gentle smoke rising into the sky. People, depicted in a caricatured style, are standing in line, anxiously holding their phones and searching "where to buy toilet paper" on Google. The warm sunlight casts a golden glow over the scene, adding a whimsical touch to the urgency.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Arson in Florida positively influenced where to buy toilet paper (Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper').

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Unrolling the Link: A Correlational Study of Arson in Florida and Google Searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'

The Journal of Quirky Social Science Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Florida and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9631411 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Unrolling the Link: A Correlational Study of Arson in Florida and Google Searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between incidents of arson in the state of Florida and online searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. The research team employed data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends to analyze this peculiar association. The findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9631411 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span of 2004 to 2022. While the initial question may evoke some laughter or skepticism, our results uncover a surprisingly strong connection that calls for further exploration. The implications of this intriguing correlation may shed light on the intricate nuances of human behavior, and our research aims to spark more interest in exploring the seemingly bizarre connections that may underlie social phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Florida and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unrolling the Link: A Correlational Study of Arson in Florida and Google Searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between incidents of arson in the state of Florida and online searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. The research team employed data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends to analyze this peculiar association. The findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9631411 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span of 2004 to 2022. While the initial question may evoke some laughter or skepticism, our results uncover a surprisingly strong connection that calls for further exploration. The implications of this intriguing correlation may shed light on the intricate nuances of human behavior, and our research aims to spark more interest in exploring the seemingly bizarre connections that may underlie social phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

Fire has been a subject of fascination and dread for humans throughout history. From early man's discovery of its destructive power to modern-day attempts to harness it for energy and industry, fire has both captivated and terrorized us. Arson, the deliberate setting of fires with criminal intent, adds an extra layer of complexity to the already enigmatic nature of fire. In the state of Florida, arson has been a persistent concern, prompting law enforcement agencies and researchers to explore its causes and potential correlates.

Furthermore, in the digital age, our behavior is often mirrored by our online activities, and Google searches have become a valuable tool for understanding human interests and concerns. The sudden surge in searches for toilet paper during the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the peculiarities of human behavior and evoked a mix of amusement and bewilderment. Hence, the improbable connection between arson in Florida and online searches for 'where to buy toilet paper' presents a novel avenue for investigation.

In this paper, we endeavor to unravel the enigmatic association between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. While the initial linkage may elicit amusement or skepticism, our investigation aims to shed light on the underlying dynamics that might explain this unexpected correlation. Through rigorous analysis of data sourced from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, we have uncovered a remarkably strong association, raising thought-provoking questions and inviting further exploration. As we delve into this unexpected connection, our research seeks to unravel the layers of intrigue and elicit a chuckle or two along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Florida and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unrolling the Link: A Correlational Study of Arson in Florida and Google Searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between incidents of arson in the state of Florida and online searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. The research team employed data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends to analyze this peculiar association. The findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9631411 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span of 2004 to 2022. While the initial question may evoke some laughter or skepticism, our results uncover a surprisingly strong connection that calls for further exploration. The implications of this intriguing correlation may shed light on the intricate nuances of human behavior, and our research aims to spark more interest in exploring the seemingly bizarre connections that may underlie social phenomena.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
Fire has been a subject of fascination and dread for humans throughout history. From early man's discovery of its destructive power to modern-day attempts to harness it for energy and industry, fire has both captivated and terrorized us. Arson, the deliberate setting of fires with criminal intent, adds an extra layer of complexity to the already enigmatic nature of fire. In the state of Florida, arson has been a persistent concern, prompting law enforcement agencies and researchers to explore its causes and potential correlates.
Furthermore, in the digital age, our behavior is often mirrored by our online activities, and Google searches have become a valuable tool for understanding human interests and concerns. The sudden surge in searches for toilet paper during the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the peculiarities of human behavior and evoked a mix of amusement and bewilderment. Hence, the improbable connection between arson in Florida and online searches for 'where to buy toilet paper' presents a novel avenue for investigation.
In this paper, we endeavor to unravel the enigmatic association between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. While the initial linkage may elicit amusement or skepticism, our investigation aims to shed light on the underlying dynamics that might explain this unexpected correlation. Through rigorous analysis of data sourced from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, we have uncovered a remarkably strong association, raising thought-provoking questions and inviting further exploration. As we delve into this unexpected connection, our research seeks to unravel the layers of intrigue and elicit a chuckle or two along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The authors begin the exploration of the peculiar correlation between arson in Florida and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper' by examining previous research on unlikely connections and the dynamics of human behavior.

Smith et al. (2010) delve into the psychological aspects of arson and its underlying motivations, providing insights into the complexities of this criminal behavior. Doe (2015) contributes to the literature by examining the impact of public awareness campaigns on arson prevention, highlighting the significance of societal responses to this issue. Jones (2018) focuses on the geographical distribution of arson incidents in Florida, shedding light on regional variations and potential influencing factors.

Moving beyond the realm of arson, the authors turn attention to non-fiction texts that touch on the idiosyncrasies of human behavior and societal trends. In "The Power of Habit" by Charles Duhigg, the intricate patterns of human habits and behaviors are dissected, offering a lens through which to comprehend the unorthodox correlations that may arise. Additionally, "Predictably Irrational" by Dan Ariely provides valuable insights into the irrational decision-making processes that underpin human actions, potentially illuminating the unexpected linkage between arson and toilet paper searches.

Expanding the scope to include fictional works that offer a whimsical take on human behavior and societal quirks, the authors draw from "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams, a science fiction novel that humorously explores the absurdities of human existence. In a similar vein, "Good Omens" by Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett presents a satirical portrayal of human foibles and peculiarities, providing a lighthearted perspective on the complexities of human behavior.

In the pursuit of a deeper understanding of human behavior, the authors also delved into popular television shows that touch on societal dynamics and unexpected connections. Series such as "MythBusters" and "Brain Games" offer entertaining insights into human cognition and behavior, tapping into the fascination with unraveling enigmatic aspects of the human experience.

As the authors juxtapose the serious and the whimsical in the quest to comprehend the curious correlation between arson in Florida and online searches for toilet paper, the literature review serves as a stepping stone into the realm of unexpected associations and the whimsical quirks of human behavior.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Florida and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unrolling the Link: A Correlational Study of Arson in Florida and Google Searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between incidents of arson in the state of Florida and online searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. The research team employed data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends to analyze this peculiar association. The findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9631411 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span of 2004 to 2022. While the initial question may evoke some laughter or skepticism, our results uncover a surprisingly strong connection that calls for further exploration. The implications of this intriguing correlation may shed light on the intricate nuances of human behavior, and our research aims to spark more interest in exploring the seemingly bizarre connections that may underlie social phenomena.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
Fire has been a subject of fascination and dread for humans throughout history. From early man's discovery of its destructive power to modern-day attempts to harness it for energy and industry, fire has both captivated and terrorized us. Arson, the deliberate setting of fires with criminal intent, adds an extra layer of complexity to the already enigmatic nature of fire. In the state of Florida, arson has been a persistent concern, prompting law enforcement agencies and researchers to explore its causes and potential correlates.
Furthermore, in the digital age, our behavior is often mirrored by our online activities, and Google searches have become a valuable tool for understanding human interests and concerns. The sudden surge in searches for toilet paper during the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the peculiarities of human behavior and evoked a mix of amusement and bewilderment. Hence, the improbable connection between arson in Florida and online searches for 'where to buy toilet paper' presents a novel avenue for investigation.
In this paper, we endeavor to unravel the enigmatic association between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. While the initial linkage may elicit amusement or skepticism, our investigation aims to shed light on the underlying dynamics that might explain this unexpected correlation. Through rigorous analysis of data sourced from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, we have uncovered a remarkably strong association, raising thought-provoking questions and inviting further exploration. As we delve into this unexpected connection, our research seeks to unravel the layers of intrigue and elicit a chuckle or two along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

Data Collection
The research team cast a wide net across the digital seas, trawling through a multitude of sources to capture the elusive data necessary for this investigation. The FBI Criminal Justice Information Services provided a robust foundation of arson-related incidents in the sunshine state of Florida, while Google Trends served as the compass guiding our exploration of the online realm. The timeline cast by our net stretched from 2004 to 2022, capturing the undulating waves of flux and flow in both criminal fire-setting and convenient tissue procurance.

The Search for Correlation
To untangle the threads of destiny that tied arson in Florida to the quest for toilet paper, we resorted to the arcane arts of statistical analysis. Our quantitative wizardry included the deployment of the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, which led us through the labyrinthine landscape of numeric relationships. With zealous precision, we sought to measure the strength and direction of the linear relationship between arson incidents and Google searches for the sacred scroll of sanitation.

Navigation of Spatiotemporal Vagaries
The convoluted paths of time and space presented formidable challenges in our pursuit of understanding the bond between fiery felonies and stashes of tissue. To apprehend these elusive connections, we concocted a grand concoction of time series analysis and spatial correlations. We held the elusive fireflies of spatiotemporal synchronization in the palm of our hands, scrutinizing their luminance under the microscope of meticulous scrutiny.

Risk Assessment and Contingency Planning
Every endeavor maneuvers through the treacherous shoals of uncertainty, and our valiant research was no exception. To navigate these hazardous waters, we meticulously heeded the principles of error estimation and likelihood inference. Our journey was further safeguarded by contingency plans capable of averting the pitfalls of confounding variables and lurking lurking lurking lurking lurking lurking lurking lurking lurking lurking lurking lurking lurking lurking lurking Sources of Bias Plagues.

In celebration of our victory over uncertainty, we now present the captivating synthesis of data and deduction that has unveiled the clandestine link between arson in Florida and the pursuit of the coveted parchment of purity. Our findings invite readers to share in our wonderment and amusement, and perhaps even inspire a knowing twinkle in their eyes as they marvel at the quirks of human behavior.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Florida and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9631411, r-squared of 0.9276408, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unrolling the Link: A Correlational Study of Arson in Florida and Google Searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between incidents of arson in the state of Florida and online searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. The research team employed data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends to analyze this peculiar association. The findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9631411 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span of 2004 to 2022. While the initial question may evoke some laughter or skepticism, our results uncover a surprisingly strong connection that calls for further exploration. The implications of this intriguing correlation may shed light on the intricate nuances of human behavior, and our research aims to spark more interest in exploring the seemingly bizarre connections that may underlie social phenomena.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
Fire has been a subject of fascination and dread for humans throughout history. From early man's discovery of its destructive power to modern-day attempts to harness it for energy and industry, fire has both captivated and terrorized us. Arson, the deliberate setting of fires with criminal intent, adds an extra layer of complexity to the already enigmatic nature of fire. In the state of Florida, arson has been a persistent concern, prompting law enforcement agencies and researchers to explore its causes and potential correlates.
Furthermore, in the digital age, our behavior is often mirrored by our online activities, and Google searches have become a valuable tool for understanding human interests and concerns. The sudden surge in searches for toilet paper during the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the peculiarities of human behavior and evoked a mix of amusement and bewilderment. Hence, the improbable connection between arson in Florida and online searches for 'where to buy toilet paper' presents a novel avenue for investigation.
In this paper, we endeavor to unravel the enigmatic association between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. While the initial linkage may elicit amusement or skepticism, our investigation aims to shed light on the underlying dynamics that might explain this unexpected correlation. Through rigorous analysis of data sourced from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, we have uncovered a remarkably strong association, raising thought-provoking questions and inviting further exploration. As we delve into this unexpected connection, our research seeks to unravel the layers of intrigue and elicit a chuckle or two along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

RESULTS

The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between incidents of arson in Florida and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. The correlation coefficient (r) was calculated to be 0.9631411, with an r-squared value of 0.9276408. Notably, the p-value was less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between the variables. These findings surpassed our initial expectations and sparked a sense of wonderment and amusement among the research team.

The correlation is visually depicted in Figure 1, which illustrates a scatterplot demonstrating the strong positive relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. This unanticipated association piqued our curiosity and inspired a myriad of puns about "fiery searches" and "flaming desires for household essentials." The unexpectedness of this correlation underscores the notion that behind every statistical analysis lies a tale of human quirks and idiosyncrasies – and perhaps a few rolls of toilet paper.

Overall, our results invite further exploration into the whimsical and uncanny connections that may underlie human behavior. We anticipate that this finding will ignite discussions, both scholarly and lighthearted, fueling the flames of curiosity in uncovering the unexpected relationships that permeate our world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Florida and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Unrolling the Link: A Correlational Study of Arson in Florida and Google Searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between incidents of arson in the state of Florida and online searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. The research team employed data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends to analyze this peculiar association. The findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9631411 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span of 2004 to 2022. While the initial question may evoke some laughter or skepticism, our results uncover a surprisingly strong connection that calls for further exploration. The implications of this intriguing correlation may shed light on the intricate nuances of human behavior, and our research aims to spark more interest in exploring the seemingly bizarre connections that may underlie social phenomena.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The authors begin the exploration of the peculiar correlation between arson in Florida and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper' by examining previous research on unlikely connections and the dynamics of human behavior.
Smith et al. (2010) delve into the psychological aspects of arson and its underlying motivations, providing insights into the complexities of this criminal behavior. Doe (2015) contributes to the literature by examining the impact of public awareness campaigns on arson prevention, highlighting the significance of societal responses to this issue. Jones (2018) focuses on the geographical distribution of arson incidents in Florida, shedding light on regional variations and potential influencing factors.
Moving beyond the realm of arson, the authors turn attention to non-fiction texts that touch on the idiosyncrasies of human behavior and societal trends. In "The Power of Habit" by Charles Duhigg, the intricate patterns of human habits and behaviors are dissected, offering a lens through which to comprehend the unorthodox correlations that may arise. Additionally, "Predictably Irrational" by Dan Ariely provides valuable insights into the irrational decision-making processes that underpin human actions, potentially illuminating the unexpected linkage between arson and toilet paper searches.
Expanding the scope to include fictional works that offer a whimsical take on human behavior and societal quirks, the authors draw from "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams, a science fiction novel that humorously explores the absurdities of human existence. In a similar vein, "Good Omens" by Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett presents a satirical portrayal of human foibles and peculiarities, providing a lighthearted perspective on the complexities of human behavior.
In the pursuit of a deeper understanding of human behavior, the authors also delved into popular television shows that touch on societal dynamics and unexpected connections. Series such as "MythBusters" and "Brain Games" offer entertaining insights into human cognition and behavior, tapping into the fascination with unraveling enigmatic aspects of the human experience.
As the authors juxtapose the serious and the whimsical in the quest to comprehend the curious correlation between arson in Florida and online searches for toilet paper, the literature review serves as a stepping stone into the realm of unexpected associations and the whimsical quirks of human behavior.


[[RESULTS]]
RESULTS
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between incidents of arson in Florida and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. The correlation coefficient (r) was calculated to be 0.9631411, with an r-squared value of 0.9276408. Notably, the p-value was less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between the variables. These findings surpassed our initial expectations and sparked a sense of wonderment and amusement among the research team.
The correlation is visually depicted in Figure 1, which illustrates a scatterplot demonstrating the strong positive relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. This unanticipated association piqued our curiosity and inspired a myriad of puns about "fiery searches" and "flaming desires for household essentials." The unexpectedness of this correlation underscores the notion that behind every statistical analysis lies a tale of human quirks and idiosyncrasies – and perhaps a few rolls of toilet paper.
Overall, our results invite further exploration into the whimsical and uncanny connections that may underlie human behavior. We anticipate that this finding will ignite discussions, both scholarly and lighthearted, fueling the flames of curiosity in uncovering the unexpected relationships that permeate our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study offer an intriguing revelation that might initially prompt a raised eyebrow or a bemused chuckle from the scientific community. However, our statistically significant correlation between arson in Florida and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper' aligns with the vein of prior research that delves into unexpected connections and the mysteries of human behavior.

Drawing from the literature review, it is worth recalling the insights from Dan Ariely's "Predictably Irrational," which sheds light on the irrational decision-making processes that drive human actions. Our results echo Ariely's premise by uncovering a seemingly irrational yet robust association between an illegal and destructive act and the mundane pursuit of household necessities. Similarly, Charles Duhigg's exploration of human habits in "The Power of Habit" finds resonance in our study, as it delves into the intricate patterns of behavior that may underlie this inexplicable correlation. These scholarly works validate the value of uncovering the whimsical and unexpected facets of human behavior, underscoring the broader implications of our research findings.

Furthermore, the whimsical realm of fiction and television, as illuminated in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy," "Good Omens," and popular shows like "MythBusters" and "Brain Games," serves as a testament to the endless enigma of human behavior. While these sources may seem tangential to rigorous academic inquiry, our study reinforces the notion that the boundaries between whimsy and scientific inquiry are often delightfully blurred.

In line with the serious investigation of arson, our statistically robust correlation aligns with previous examinations of the geographical distribution and underlying motivations of arson in Florida, as exemplified by Jones' work. Our study takes this exploration a step further by uncovering an unexpected association that hints at the intricate web of societal trends and individual behaviors. This peculiar correlation underscores the need to consider outliers and unanticipated linkages, encouraging a more holistic understanding of human behavior and its multifarious manifestations.

By incorporating these perspectives, our study underscores the importance of embracing the unexpected and the offbeat in scientific inquiry. The correlation between arson and toilet paper searches may serve as a quirky reminder that amidst the seriousness of research lies the potential for whimsy and delight, offering unexpected avenues for scholarly exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Arson in Florida and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Unrolling the Link: A Correlational Study of Arson in Florida and Google Searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between incidents of arson in the state of Florida and online searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. The research team employed data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends to analyze this peculiar association. The findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9631411 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span of 2004 to 2022. While the initial question may evoke some laughter or skepticism, our results uncover a surprisingly strong connection that calls for further exploration. The implications of this intriguing correlation may shed light on the intricate nuances of human behavior, and our research aims to spark more interest in exploring the seemingly bizarre connections that may underlie social phenomena.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
Fire has been a subject of fascination and dread for humans throughout history. From early man's discovery of its destructive power to modern-day attempts to harness it for energy and industry, fire has both captivated and terrorized us. Arson, the deliberate setting of fires with criminal intent, adds an extra layer of complexity to the already enigmatic nature of fire. In the state of Florida, arson has been a persistent concern, prompting law enforcement agencies and researchers to explore its causes and potential correlates.
Furthermore, in the digital age, our behavior is often mirrored by our online activities, and Google searches have become a valuable tool for understanding human interests and concerns. The sudden surge in searches for toilet paper during the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the peculiarities of human behavior and evoked a mix of amusement and bewilderment. Hence, the improbable connection between arson in Florida and online searches for 'where to buy toilet paper' presents a novel avenue for investigation.
In this paper, we endeavor to unravel the enigmatic association between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. While the initial linkage may elicit amusement or skepticism, our investigation aims to shed light on the underlying dynamics that might explain this unexpected correlation. Through rigorous analysis of data sourced from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends, we have uncovered a remarkably strong association, raising thought-provoking questions and inviting further exploration. As we delve into this unexpected connection, our research seeks to unravel the layers of intrigue and elicit a chuckle or two along the way.

[[RESULTS]]
RESULTS
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between incidents of arson in Florida and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. The correlation coefficient (r) was calculated to be 0.9631411, with an r-squared value of 0.9276408. Notably, the p-value was less than 0.01, indicating a statistically significant relationship between the variables. These findings surpassed our initial expectations and sparked a sense of wonderment and amusement among the research team.
The correlation is visually depicted in Figure 1, which illustrates a scatterplot demonstrating the strong positive relationship between the two seemingly disparate phenomena. This unanticipated association piqued our curiosity and inspired a myriad of puns about "fiery searches" and "flaming desires for household essentials." The unexpectedness of this correlation underscores the notion that behind every statistical analysis lies a tale of human quirks and idiosyncrasies – and perhaps a few rolls of toilet paper.
Overall, our results invite further exploration into the whimsical and uncanny connections that may underlie human behavior. We anticipate that this finding will ignite discussions, both scholarly and lighthearted, fueling the flames of curiosity in uncovering the unexpected relationships that permeate our world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings of this study remarkably unveil a robust correlation between arson in Florida and Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper', leaving us both amused and bemused. The statistical significance of this association, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9631411 and a p-value of less than 0.01, ignites a sense of curiosity and tickles the funny bone, prompting an array of fiery puns and quizzical musings. Our unexpected discovery underscores the whimsical and enigmatic nature of human behavior, reminding us that behind every set of data lies a tale of human quirks, cravings, and perhaps a burning desire for household essentials.

While this correlation may seem far-fetched, or should we say, far-flame-stretched, it undoubtedly opens the door to a plethora of jokes and wry observations. However, as much as we'd love to continue uncovering bizarre correlations that provide fodder for entertaining banter, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. Instead, let us savor this unexpected finding and relish the quirkiness of human behavior. After all, sometimes the most unexpected connections can spark the brightest flames of curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Unrolling the Link: A Correlational Study of Arson in Florida and Google Searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Social Science Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Unrolling the Link: A Correlational Study of Arson in Florida and Google Searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Socioeconomic Investigation and Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Unrolling the Link: A Correlational Study of Arson in Florida and Google Searches for 'where to buy toilet paper' with an abstract of This paper investigates the relationship between incidents of arson in the state of Florida and online searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'. The research team employed data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Google Trends to analyze this peculiar association. The findings revealed a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9631411 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time span of 2004 to 2022. While the initial question may evoke some laughter or skepticism, our results uncover a surprisingly strong connection that calls for further exploration. The implications of this intriguing correlation may shed light on the intricate nuances of human behavior, and our research aims to spark more interest in exploring the seemingly bizarre connections that may underlie social phenomena.

ChatGPT:

arson in Florida, toilet paper sales, online searches, Google Trends, criminal behavior, correlation study, human behavior, bizarre connections, social phenomena

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Arson in Florida
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Florida
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Florida

Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'

Correlation r = 0.9631411 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9276408 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 92.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Arson in Florida) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.0E-11. 0.0000000000398634134121009900
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 4.0E-9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 25,085,659,115 random variables You don't actually need 25 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.9, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Arson in Florida (Arson rate)17.91414.414.7141210.19.498.57.77.47.16.55.35132.412.5
Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper' (Rel. search volume)0.3333330.5833330.3333330.083333300.3333330.50.2510.83333311111112.583311




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([17.9,14,14.4,14.7,14,12,10.1,9.4,9,8.5,7.7,7.4,7.1,6.5,5.3,5,132.4,1,2.5,])
array_2 = np.array([0.333333,0.583333,0.333333,0.0833333,0,0.333333,0.5,0.25,1,0.833333,1,1,1,1,1,1,12.5833,1,1,])
array_1_name = "Arson in Florida"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'where to buy toilet paper'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 3337 · Black Variable ID: 20080 · Red Variable ID: 1385
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0