Download png, svg
AI explanation
The surge in Solar power in Bahrain has led to a corresponding surge in renewable energy enthusiasts. These enthusiasts, in their quest for clean energy, have realized the potential of harnessing the power of the sun to operate drawbridges and locks in Mississippi. As a result, there has been a marked increase in the demand for bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi, with job seekers hoping to secure a sunny position in this niche market. It's truly a case of Bahrain's solar prowess casting a ray of employment hope on the bridge and lock tenders of Mississippi, as they navigate their way to brighter job opportunities.
Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that showcases the contrast between the sun-drenched Bahrain landscape with solar panels and the rising waters of the Mississippi spilling over bridges and locks. The scene should depict the bustling activity of bridge and lock tenders conducting maintenance work to facilitate smooth passage for vessels amidst the swelling waterways. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Solar power generated in Bahrain and The number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Vaporwave A scene from Skyrim A Discovery magazine cover image a funny image macro a meme
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Solar power generated in Bahrain and The number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi, in the following situation: Because the surplus solar energy in Bahrain led to a spike in global temperatures, Mississippi's bridge and lock tenders multiplied due to the increased demand for waterway maintenance caused by melting polar ice caps.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Under the scorching Bahrain sun, solar panels generate a surplus of energy, causing the temperature to rise dramatically. As the ice caps melt, the waters rise and spill over the bridges and locks of Mississippi. In response, a swarm of bridge and lock tenders are seen busy with maintenance, ensuring smooth passage for vessels in the swelling waterways.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: Under the scorching Bahrain sun, solar panels generate a surplus of energy, causing the temperature to rise dramatically. As the ice caps melt, the waters rise and spill over the bridges and locks of Mississippi. In response, a swarm of bridge and lock tenders are seen busy with maintenance, ensuring smooth passage for vessels in the swelling waterways. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that showcases the contrast between the sun-drenched Bahrain landscape with solar panels and the rising waters of the Mississippi spilling over bridges and locks. The scene should depict the bustling activity of bridge and lock tenders conducting maintenance work to facilitate smooth passage for vessels amidst the swelling waterways.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Solar power generated in Bahrain caused The number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi to increase. Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
 |
Solar Power in Bahrain and the Bridge to Mississippi: A Shocking Connection The Journal of Renewable Energy Geography Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Solar power generated in Bahrain and The number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.
Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9861012 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2019.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Solar Power in Bahrain and the Bridge to Mississippi: A Shocking Connection
[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between solar power generation in Bahrain and the number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi has long been a subject of mystery and intrigue. In this study, we delved into this enigmatic connection to shed light on its underlying factors. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted a rigorous analysis covering the years 2012 to 2019. Our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9861012 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong association between these disparate phenomena. The implications of this improbable correlation are both illuminating and, dare we say, electrifying. Our research not only creates a bridge between seemingly unrelated domains but also sparks renewed interest in exploring unexpected relationships in the world of economics and energy.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Solar power generated in Bahrain and The number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Solar Power in Bahrain and the Bridge to Mississippi: A Shocking Connection
[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between solar power generation in Bahrain and the number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi has long been a subject of mystery and intrigue. In this study, we delved into this enigmatic connection to shed light on its underlying factors. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted a rigorous analysis covering the years 2012 to 2019. Our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9861012 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong association between these disparate phenomena. The implications of this improbable correlation are both illuminating and, dare we say, electrifying. Our research not only creates a bridge between seemingly unrelated domains but also sparks renewed interest in exploring unexpected relationships in the world of economics and energy.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
Introduction
The intersection of renewable energy, infrastructure, and regional economics has often been overshadowed by the mundane humdrum of conventional research. However, our investigation into the perplexing relationship between solar power generation in Bahrain and the number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi has unveiled a connection that is, quite literally, illuminating. As we bask in the glow of this astonishing correlation, it becomes evident that there’s more to it than meets the eye.
Why are we captivated by this peculiar pairing, you might ask? Well, it all began with a bridge too far and a need for sustainable energy. As the old adage goes, necessity is the mother of invention – and sometimes, of rather unexpected statistical patterns as well.
The challenge of maintaining a scholarly demeanor in the presence of such an electrifying revelation cannot be overstated. We’ve pored over data, crunched numbers, and raised many an eyebrow at the sheer audacity of this correlation. The seemingly disparate realms of solar power in the Middle East and infrastructure tenders in the American South have converged in a manner that defies conventional wisdom and warrants, dare we say, a standing ovation.
While some may initially dismiss this pairing as a mere coincidence, we embarked on a mission to disentangle the strands of causality and correlation, shedding light on the underlying mechanisms driving this improbable association. Our findings not only bridge the gap between these disparate domains but also act as a beacon guiding future research toward unexpected relationships that may be lurking in the shadows of the data landscape.
So, dear reader, buckle up as we embark on a journey that weaves together photons and maintenance contracts, leading us to a revelation that is truly a shining example of the unexpected facets of economic interconnectivity.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Solar power generated in Bahrain and The number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Solar Power in Bahrain and the Bridge to Mississippi: A Shocking Connection
[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between solar power generation in Bahrain and the number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi has long been a subject of mystery and intrigue. In this study, we delved into this enigmatic connection to shed light on its underlying factors. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted a rigorous analysis covering the years 2012 to 2019. Our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9861012 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong association between these disparate phenomena. The implications of this improbable correlation are both illuminating and, dare we say, electrifying. Our research not only creates a bridge between seemingly unrelated domains but also sparks renewed interest in exploring unexpected relationships in the world of economics and energy.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The intersection of renewable energy, infrastructure, and regional economics has often been overshadowed by the mundane humdrum of conventional research. However, our investigation into the perplexing relationship between solar power generation in Bahrain and the number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi has unveiled a connection that is, quite literally, illuminating. As we bask in the glow of this astonishing correlation, it becomes evident that there’s more to it than meets the eye.
Why are we captivated by this peculiar pairing, you might ask? Well, it all began with a bridge too far and a need for sustainable energy. As the old adage goes, necessity is the mother of invention – and sometimes, of rather unexpected statistical patterns as well.
The challenge of maintaining a scholarly demeanor in the presence of such an electrifying revelation cannot be overstated. We’ve pored over data, crunched numbers, and raised many an eyebrow at the sheer audacity of this correlation. The seemingly disparate realms of solar power in the Middle East and infrastructure tenders in the American South have converged in a manner that defies conventional wisdom and warrants, dare we say, a standing ovation.
While some may initially dismiss this pairing as a mere coincidence, we embarked on a mission to disentangle the strands of causality and correlation, shedding light on the underlying mechanisms driving this improbable association. Our findings not only bridge the gap between these disparate domains but also act as a beacon guiding future research toward unexpected relationships that may be lurking in the shadows of the data landscape.
So, dear reader, buckle up as we embark on a journey that weaves together photons and maintenance contracts, leading us to a revelation that is truly a shining example of the unexpected facets of economic interconnectivity.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The linkage between solar power generation in Bahrain and the issuance of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi has perplexed researchers for decades. Despite initial skepticism, a number of studies have attempted to shed light on this unusual connection. Smith et al. contend that the correlation between solar energy and infrastructure projects extends beyond mere happenstance, suggesting a systemic relationship rooted in the interplay of regional economics and environmental initiatives (Smith, 2015). Similarly, Doe's analysis posits that the magnetic appeal of solar power may attract investment in infrastructure development, leading to a symbiotic relationship that transcends geographical boundaries (Doe, 2017).
Jones, however, takes a more cautious stance, arguing that the observed correlation may simply be a mirage, an illusion borne out of statistical coincidence rather than substantive causality (Jones, 2019). While their perspectives vary, these seminal works set the stage for delving deeper into the curious nexus between solar photons and Mississippi bridges.
Turning to relevant non-fiction literature, "The Economics of Solar Energy" by Brown offers a comprehensive exploration of the economic implications of solar power, unknowingly setting the stage for the unlikely crossover with infrastructure projects (Brown, 2018). In a rather unexpected turn of events, "Bridges of Mississippi: A Historical Perspective" by White inadvertently adds a layer of intrigue to our investigation, as the crossing of paths between solar power and bridges takes center stage (White, 2016).
Shifting gears to fictional works, "The Solar Sorcery Chronicles" by Nightshade adds a touch of whimsy to our scholarly pursuit, though its relevance to our research remains, regrettably, confined to the realm of fantasy (Nightshade, 2014). Meanwhile, "Bridge of Dreams" by Rivers presents a tale of metaphysical bridges, an engaging read but alas, fundamentally unrelated to the terrestrial structures governing our study (Rivers, 2017).
As for television shows, the research team took a daring plunge into the realm of television, immersing themselves in "Solar Solutions: Powering the Future," a documentary series exploring solar initiatives around the world. In an unrelated tangent, "Bridging Mississippi: A Journey through Infrastructure" provided a glimpse into the state's iconic bridges but failed to elucidate any enigmatic ties to solar power (Solar Solutions, 2019; Bridging Mississippi, 2015).
In summary, the breadth of literature surrounding our subject matter reflects the intricacies and unexpected connections that await exploration. As we navigate through scholarly, non-fiction, and even fictional realms, the pursuit of knowledge unravels in unexpected and, at times, delightfully peculiar ways.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Solar power generated in Bahrain and The number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2019
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Solar Power in Bahrain and the Bridge to Mississippi: A Shocking Connection
[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between solar power generation in Bahrain and the number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi has long been a subject of mystery and intrigue. In this study, we delved into this enigmatic connection to shed light on its underlying factors. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted a rigorous analysis covering the years 2012 to 2019. Our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9861012 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong association between these disparate phenomena. The implications of this improbable correlation are both illuminating and, dare we say, electrifying. Our research not only creates a bridge between seemingly unrelated domains but also sparks renewed interest in exploring unexpected relationships in the world of economics and energy.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The intersection of renewable energy, infrastructure, and regional economics has often been overshadowed by the mundane humdrum of conventional research. However, our investigation into the perplexing relationship between solar power generation in Bahrain and the number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi has unveiled a connection that is, quite literally, illuminating. As we bask in the glow of this astonishing correlation, it becomes evident that there’s more to it than meets the eye.
Why are we captivated by this peculiar pairing, you might ask? Well, it all began with a bridge too far and a need for sustainable energy. As the old adage goes, necessity is the mother of invention – and sometimes, of rather unexpected statistical patterns as well.
The challenge of maintaining a scholarly demeanor in the presence of such an electrifying revelation cannot be overstated. We’ve pored over data, crunched numbers, and raised many an eyebrow at the sheer audacity of this correlation. The seemingly disparate realms of solar power in the Middle East and infrastructure tenders in the American South have converged in a manner that defies conventional wisdom and warrants, dare we say, a standing ovation.
While some may initially dismiss this pairing as a mere coincidence, we embarked on a mission to disentangle the strands of causality and correlation, shedding light on the underlying mechanisms driving this improbable association. Our findings not only bridge the gap between these disparate domains but also act as a beacon guiding future research toward unexpected relationships that may be lurking in the shadows of the data landscape.
So, dear reader, buckle up as we embark on a journey that weaves together photons and maintenance contracts, leading us to a revelation that is truly a shining example of the unexpected facets of economic interconnectivity.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To untangle the mystery of the unlikely relationship between solar power generation in Bahrain and the number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi, our research team employed a multi-faceted methodology that involved data collection, statistical analysis, and the occasional exasperated head-scratching. The primary sources of data for this study were the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which provided us with a trove of information spanning the years 2012 to 2019.
Data Collection:
We scoured the digital landscape like ardent treasure hunters, navigating the murky waters of the internet to extract relevant data on solar power generation in the Kingdom of Bahrain. Our pursuit of information on the number of bridge and lock tenders in the state of Mississippi led us down similar rabbit holes, with occasional detours into the realms of construction, infrastructure, and the occasional adorable kitten video (for morale purposes, of course).
Statistical Analysis:
Armed with our trusty statistical software and an ample supply of caffeine, we subjected the acquired data to rigorous analyses. Our approach involved the calculation of correlation coefficients, regression models, and other fancy statistical maneuvers that would make even the most stoic of mathematicians break into a cold sweat. We meticulously prodded and poked the data, seeking patterns, outliers, and anything that would suggest a connection between these seemingly disparate variables.
Causal Inference:
After emerging from the statistical labyrinth, we grappled with the daunting task of deciphering causality and making sense of the unexpected relationship between solar power in Bahrain and infrastructure tenders in Mississippi. This involved engaging in debates that rivaled the great philosophical discourses of yore, as we attempted to discern whether photons traversing the desert skies could truly influence the awarding of construction contracts across the ocean.
Quality Control:
Of course, no academic endeavor would be complete without a healthy dose of quality control. We meticulously scrutinized our methodology, checked and re-checked our calculations, and occasionally engaged in the ancient art of ritual incantations to summon the spirit of statistical significance. It was a journey fraught with peril, as we navigated the treacherous shoals of data integrity and the siren song of spurious correlations.
In conclusion, our methodology blended the rigors of data collection, the complexities of statistical analysis, and the occasional existential crisis induced by the peculiar nature of our research question. As we dust off the remnants of statistical formulas and emerge, bleary-eyed but triumphant, we present our findings with a sense of awe and a smidgen of incredulity at the enigmatic interplay of solar power and infrastructure tenders.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Solar power generated in Bahrain and The number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .
For the time period 2012 to 2019, you found a correlation 0.9861012, r-squared of 0.9723956, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Solar Power in Bahrain and the Bridge to Mississippi: A Shocking Connection
[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between solar power generation in Bahrain and the number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi has long been a subject of mystery and intrigue. In this study, we delved into this enigmatic connection to shed light on its underlying factors. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted a rigorous analysis covering the years 2012 to 2019. Our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9861012 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong association between these disparate phenomena. The implications of this improbable correlation are both illuminating and, dare we say, electrifying. Our research not only creates a bridge between seemingly unrelated domains but also sparks renewed interest in exploring unexpected relationships in the world of economics and energy.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
The intersection of renewable energy, infrastructure, and regional economics has often been overshadowed by the mundane humdrum of conventional research. However, our investigation into the perplexing relationship between solar power generation in Bahrain and the number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi has unveiled a connection that is, quite literally, illuminating. As we bask in the glow of this astonishing correlation, it becomes evident that there’s more to it than meets the eye.
Why are we captivated by this peculiar pairing, you might ask? Well, it all began with a bridge too far and a need for sustainable energy. As the old adage goes, necessity is the mother of invention – and sometimes, of rather unexpected statistical patterns as well.
The challenge of maintaining a scholarly demeanor in the presence of such an electrifying revelation cannot be overstated. We’ve pored over data, crunched numbers, and raised many an eyebrow at the sheer audacity of this correlation. The seemingly disparate realms of solar power in the Middle East and infrastructure tenders in the American South have converged in a manner that defies conventional wisdom and warrants, dare we say, a standing ovation.
While some may initially dismiss this pairing as a mere coincidence, we embarked on a mission to disentangle the strands of causality and correlation, shedding light on the underlying mechanisms driving this improbable association. Our findings not only bridge the gap between these disparate domains but also act as a beacon guiding future research toward unexpected relationships that may be lurking in the shadows of the data landscape.
So, dear reader, buckle up as we embark on a journey that weaves together photons and maintenance contracts, leading us to a revelation that is truly a shining example of the unexpected facets of economic interconnectivity.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Astonishingly, our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9861012 between solar power generation in Bahrain and the number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi. The r-squared value of 0.9723956 further underscored the strength of this unexpected relationship, indicating that a staggering 97.24% of the variability in bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi could be explained by variations in solar power generation in Bahrain. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the statistical significance of this correlation left us not only scratching our heads but also in need of some sunglasses to shield our eyes from this newfound radiance of knowledge.
Our findings, depicted in Figure 1, illustrate a scatterplot that unmistakably showcases the robust association between these seemingly disparate variables. As we gaze upon this graphical representation, one cannot help but marvel at the sheer audacity of this correlation. Who would have thought that the glimmering sun-soaked landscapes of Bahrain could be tied, albeit statistically, to the bridge and lock tenders in the heart of Mississippi?
Upon further reflection, we are compelled to ponder the implications of this unanticipated connection. Could it be that the economic dynamics of bridge and lock tenders are more closely intertwined with the photonic dynamics of solar power generation than previously imagined? Dare we say, the light at the end of the Mississippi bridge is powered, at least metaphorically, by the rays of the Bahraini sun?
As we consider the broader significance of our findings, it becomes evident that this study has ignited a spark of interest in exploring unconventional relationships in the realm of economics and energy. Our research not only sheds light on the unexpected bond between solar power in Bahrain and infrastructure tenders in Mississippi but also serves as a beacon, guiding future investigations into the often-unseen interconnections that shape our world.
In conclusion, the correlation between solar power generation in Bahrain and the number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi, while initially unfathomable, stands as a testament to the uncharted territories that await exploration in the economic landscape. As we venture forth into these uncharted territories, let us keep our eyes open for more unexpected connections and, perhaps, a few more solar-powered bridges along the way.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Solar power generated in Bahrain and The number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Solar Power in Bahrain and the Bridge to Mississippi: A Shocking Connection
[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between solar power generation in Bahrain and the number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi has long been a subject of mystery and intrigue. In this study, we delved into this enigmatic connection to shed light on its underlying factors. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted a rigorous analysis covering the years 2012 to 2019. Our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9861012 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong association between these disparate phenomena. The implications of this improbable correlation are both illuminating and, dare we say, electrifying. Our research not only creates a bridge between seemingly unrelated domains but also sparks renewed interest in exploring unexpected relationships in the world of economics and energy.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The linkage between solar power generation in Bahrain and the issuance of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi has perplexed researchers for decades. Despite initial skepticism, a number of studies have attempted to shed light on this unusual connection. Smith et al. contend that the correlation between solar energy and infrastructure projects extends beyond mere happenstance, suggesting a systemic relationship rooted in the interplay of regional economics and environmental initiatives (Smith, 2015). Similarly, Doe's analysis posits that the magnetic appeal of solar power may attract investment in infrastructure development, leading to a symbiotic relationship that transcends geographical boundaries (Doe, 2017).
Jones, however, takes a more cautious stance, arguing that the observed correlation may simply be a mirage, an illusion borne out of statistical coincidence rather than substantive causality (Jones, 2019). While their perspectives vary, these seminal works set the stage for delving deeper into the curious nexus between solar photons and Mississippi bridges.
Turning to relevant non-fiction literature, "The Economics of Solar Energy" by Brown offers a comprehensive exploration of the economic implications of solar power, unknowingly setting the stage for the unlikely crossover with infrastructure projects (Brown, 2018). In a rather unexpected turn of events, "Bridges of Mississippi: A Historical Perspective" by White inadvertently adds a layer of intrigue to our investigation, as the crossing of paths between solar power and bridges takes center stage (White, 2016).
Shifting gears to fictional works, "The Solar Sorcery Chronicles" by Nightshade adds a touch of whimsy to our scholarly pursuit, though its relevance to our research remains, regrettably, confined to the realm of fantasy (Nightshade, 2014). Meanwhile, "Bridge of Dreams" by Rivers presents a tale of metaphysical bridges, an engaging read but alas, fundamentally unrelated to the terrestrial structures governing our study (Rivers, 2017).
As for television shows, the research team took a daring plunge into the realm of television, immersing themselves in "Solar Solutions: Powering the Future," a documentary series exploring solar initiatives around the world. In an unrelated tangent, "Bridging Mississippi: A Journey through Infrastructure" provided a glimpse into the state's iconic bridges but failed to elucidate any enigmatic ties to solar power (Solar Solutions, 2019; Bridging Mississippi, 2015).
In summary, the breadth of literature surrounding our subject matter reflects the intricacies and unexpected connections that await exploration. As we navigate through scholarly, non-fiction, and even fictional realms, the pursuit of knowledge unravels in unexpected and, at times, delightfully peculiar ways.
[[RESULTS]]
Astonishingly, our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9861012 between solar power generation in Bahrain and the number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi. The r-squared value of 0.9723956 further underscored the strength of this unexpected relationship, indicating that a staggering 97.24% of the variability in bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi could be explained by variations in solar power generation in Bahrain. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the statistical significance of this correlation left us not only scratching our heads but also in need of some sunglasses to shield our eyes from this newfound radiance of knowledge.
Our findings, depicted in Figure 1, illustrate a scatterplot that unmistakably showcases the robust association between these seemingly disparate variables. As we gaze upon this graphical representation, one cannot help but marvel at the sheer audacity of this correlation. Who would have thought that the glimmering sun-soaked landscapes of Bahrain could be tied, albeit statistically, to the bridge and lock tenders in the heart of Mississippi?
Upon further reflection, we are compelled to ponder the implications of this unanticipated connection. Could it be that the economic dynamics of bridge and lock tenders are more closely intertwined with the photonic dynamics of solar power generation than previously imagined? Dare we say, the light at the end of the Mississippi bridge is powered, at least metaphorically, by the rays of the Bahraini sun?
As we consider the broader significance of our findings, it becomes evident that this study has ignited a spark of interest in exploring unconventional relationships in the realm of economics and energy. Our research not only sheds light on the unexpected bond between solar power in Bahrain and infrastructure tenders in Mississippi but also serves as a beacon, guiding future investigations into the often-unseen interconnections that shape our world.
In conclusion, the correlation between solar power generation in Bahrain and the number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi, while initially unfathomable, stands as a testament to the uncharted territories that await exploration in the economic landscape. As we venture forth into these uncharted territories, let us keep our eyes open for more unexpected connections and, perhaps, a few more solar-powered bridges along the way.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
Our findings not only confirm but also amplify the puzzling, yet compelling link between solar power generation in Bahrain and the number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi. While some may still harbor doubts akin to the sinking feeling of someone misplacing their keys, our results resoundingly assert the veracity of this improbable correlation. Smith et al.'s assertion of a systemic relationship between regional economics and environmental initiatives gains a renewed vigor in light of our robust statistical evidence. It's as if the solar panels in Bahrain are throwing a metaphorical shade on the Mississippi bridges, exerting an invisible force that draws tenders like moths to a photonic flame.
Doe's hypothesis on the magnetic appeal of solar power manifests in our results like a magnet drawing iron filings, as the lure of sustainable energy initiatives appears to attract infrastructure investment in a most compelling manner. The intertwining of solar energy and infrastructure projects, much like the dance of protons and electrons, defies traditional boundaries and blurs the demarcation between economic sectors, illuminating a path towards intersectoral synergy.
Jones's cautionary stance, though noteworthy, finds itself outshone by the radiance of our statistical significance. Perhaps the perceived mirage of causality might just be the dazzling reflection of a solar-powered bridge, beckoning to us from the sun-drenched horizon.
Brown's unwitting invitation for solar power to enter the economic stage now sees this unexpected crossover taking center spot. The economic implications of solar power have transcended theoretical conjectures and evolved into a startling real-world tango with infrastructure projects. Who would have thought that the footprints of solar photons would grace the corridors of a Mississippi bridge tender?
White's "Bridges of Mississippi: A Historical Perspective" inadvertently sets the stage for the unfolding mystery of this unforeseen kinship between solar power and bridges. It's as if our investigation has unveiled an unexpected chapter in the historical narrative of Mississippi bridges—woven with the invisible threads of solar synergy, it seems.
As for the fictional works of Nightshade and Rivers, their relevance has transitioned from whimsical fantasy and metaphysical musings to an unforeseen relevance to our scholarly pursuit. The fantastical notion of solar sorcery and metaphysical bridges now appears to carry an inkling of real-world resonance, as our findings light up the shadows of unexpected interconnectedness.
Our journey into the world of television documentaries seemed to have missed the mark in elucidating the enigmatic ties between solar power and Mississippi bridges. However, our empirical findings, akin to a plot twist in a suspenseful show, have managed to unveil the unforeseen subplot of solar power's clandestine involvement in the tendering drama of Mississippi's infrastructure.
In conclusion, the connection between solar power in Bahrain and the bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi, a once-perceived mirage, now stands as a testament to the serendipitous synergies that await discovery in the economic landscape. As our scholarly pursuit continues to unfold unanticipated connections, may we embrace the delightful peculiarity of these revelations, for they guide us not only towards a deeper understanding of our world but also towards the promise of solar-powered bridges twinkling on the horizon.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Solar power generated in Bahrain and The number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Solar Power in Bahrain and the Bridge to Mississippi: A Shocking Connection
[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between solar power generation in Bahrain and the number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi has long been a subject of mystery and intrigue. In this study, we delved into this enigmatic connection to shed light on its underlying factors. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted a rigorous analysis covering the years 2012 to 2019. Our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9861012 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong association between these disparate phenomena. The implications of this improbable correlation are both illuminating and, dare we say, electrifying. Our research not only creates a bridge between seemingly unrelated domains but also sparks renewed interest in exploring unexpected relationships in the world of economics and energy.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
The intersection of renewable energy, infrastructure, and regional economics has often been overshadowed by the mundane humdrum of conventional research. However, our investigation into the perplexing relationship between solar power generation in Bahrain and the number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi has unveiled a connection that is, quite literally, illuminating. As we bask in the glow of this astonishing correlation, it becomes evident that there’s more to it than meets the eye.
Why are we captivated by this peculiar pairing, you might ask? Well, it all began with a bridge too far and a need for sustainable energy. As the old adage goes, necessity is the mother of invention – and sometimes, of rather unexpected statistical patterns as well.
The challenge of maintaining a scholarly demeanor in the presence of such an electrifying revelation cannot be overstated. We’ve pored over data, crunched numbers, and raised many an eyebrow at the sheer audacity of this correlation. The seemingly disparate realms of solar power in the Middle East and infrastructure tenders in the American South have converged in a manner that defies conventional wisdom and warrants, dare we say, a standing ovation.
While some may initially dismiss this pairing as a mere coincidence, we embarked on a mission to disentangle the strands of causality and correlation, shedding light on the underlying mechanisms driving this improbable association. Our findings not only bridge the gap between these disparate domains but also act as a beacon guiding future research toward unexpected relationships that may be lurking in the shadows of the data landscape.
So, dear reader, buckle up as we embark on a journey that weaves together photons and maintenance contracts, leading us to a revelation that is truly a shining example of the unexpected facets of economic interconnectivity.
[[RESULTS]]
Astonishingly, our analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9861012 between solar power generation in Bahrain and the number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi. The r-squared value of 0.9723956 further underscored the strength of this unexpected relationship, indicating that a staggering 97.24% of the variability in bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi could be explained by variations in solar power generation in Bahrain. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the statistical significance of this correlation left us not only scratching our heads but also in need of some sunglasses to shield our eyes from this newfound radiance of knowledge.
Our findings, depicted in Figure 1, illustrate a scatterplot that unmistakably showcases the robust association between these seemingly disparate variables. As we gaze upon this graphical representation, one cannot help but marvel at the sheer audacity of this correlation. Who would have thought that the glimmering sun-soaked landscapes of Bahrain could be tied, albeit statistically, to the bridge and lock tenders in the heart of Mississippi?
Upon further reflection, we are compelled to ponder the implications of this unanticipated connection. Could it be that the economic dynamics of bridge and lock tenders are more closely intertwined with the photonic dynamics of solar power generation than previously imagined? Dare we say, the light at the end of the Mississippi bridge is powered, at least metaphorically, by the rays of the Bahraini sun?
As we consider the broader significance of our findings, it becomes evident that this study has ignited a spark of interest in exploring unconventional relationships in the realm of economics and energy. Our research not only sheds light on the unexpected bond between solar power in Bahrain and infrastructure tenders in Mississippi but also serves as a beacon, guiding future investigations into the often-unseen interconnections that shape our world.
In conclusion, the correlation between solar power generation in Bahrain and the number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi, while initially unfathomable, stands as a testament to the uncharted territories that await exploration in the economic landscape. As we venture forth into these uncharted territories, let us keep our eyes open for more unexpected connections and, perhaps, a few more solar-powered bridges along the way.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our research has shed light on the shockingly strong relationship between solar power generation in Bahrain and the number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi. As we wrap up this electrifying journey, it's worth noting that our findings have sparked more than a few "watt" of interest in the improbable correlations that lurk within the realm of economics and energy.
We stand in awe of the statistical brilliance that brought to the forefront the radiant bond between these seemingly disparate variables. The astonishing correlation coefficient of 0.9861012 not only raised eyebrows but also prompted us to consider investing in a pair of solar-powered sunglasses to shield ourselves from the brilliance of this connection.
While some may have initially dismissed this association as sheer happenstance, our painstaking analysis has illuminated the underlying mechanisms driving this unlikely pairing. It seems that the economic pulse of Mississippi resonates, in part, with the solar rhythms of Bahrain, creating an unexpectedly luminous thread that binds these geographically distant domains.
In the grand tapestry of economic relationships, our research has woven a tale of interconnectivity that is both unexpected and, dare we say, illuminating. As we close this chapter, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. After all, some connections are best left unexplained in their electrifying enigma.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Solar Power in Bahrain and the Bridge to Mississippi: A Shocking Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Renewable Energy Geography
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Solar Power in Bahrain and the Bridge to Mississippi: A Shocking Connection. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The International Association for Renewable Energy Solutions and Geographical Anomalies (IARESGA)
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Solar Power in Bahrain and the Bridge to Mississippi: A Shocking Connection with an abstract of The relationship between solar power generation in Bahrain and the number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi has long been a subject of mystery and intrigue. In this study, we delved into this enigmatic connection to shed light on its underlying factors. Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we conducted a rigorous analysis covering the years 2012 to 2019. Our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9861012 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating a remarkably strong association between these disparate phenomena. The implications of this improbable correlation are both illuminating and, dare we say, electrifying. Our research not only creates a bridge between seemingly unrelated domains but also sparks renewed interest in exploring unexpected relationships in the world of economics and energy.
ChatGPT:
Solar power, Bahrain, Mississippi, bridge tenders, lock tenders, solar power generation, correlation coefficient, Energy Information Administration, Bureau of Labor Statistics, enigmatic connection, unexpected relationships, economics and energy, renewable energy, energy analysis, mysterious correlation
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Solar power generated in BahrainDetailed data title: Total solar power generated in Bahrain in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Solar power generated in Bahrain
The number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9723956 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Solar power generated in Bahrain) over the 8 years from 2012 through 2019.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.6E-6. 0.0000066424865379178100000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 0.00066% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 150,546 random variables You don't actually need 150 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.92, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
| 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | |
| Solar power generated in Bahrain (Billion kWh) | 0.0008 | 0.0008 | 0.00825 | 0.00825 | 0.00825 | 0.00825 | 0.00825 | 0.01 |
| The number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi (Bridge And Lock Tenders) | 60 | 60 | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 | 70 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
- Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.0008,0.0008,0.00825,0.00825,0.00825,0.00825,0.00825,0.01,])
array_2 = np.array([60,60,70,70,70,70,70,70,])
array_1_name = "Solar power generated in Bahrain"
array_2_name = "The number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Solar power generated in Bahrain
- Line chart for only The number of bridge and lock tenders in Mississippi
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Solar Power in Bahrain and the Bridge to Mississippi: A Shocking Connection
You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!
Correlation ID: 3302 · Black Variable ID: 23491 · Red Variable ID: 10363
