about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,292 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of pipelayers in Nevada and the second variable is Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls'.  The chart goes from 2008 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

There must have been a pipe dream to create a Bratz Doll pipeline, but it seems like that plan just couldn't connect! As the pipelayers dwindled in Nevada, so did the interest in these fashion-forward dolls. It's as if the lack of pipelayers laid the groundwork for a decrease in Bratz Doll mania, leaving us all wondering if this correlation is just a bunch of pipefitters!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate a photo-realistic image of a Nevada desert landscape with a row of glossy yellow pipelayers stretching across the sandy terrain, surrounded by a group of excited children. The children are gathered around the pipelayers, busily using their smartphones to search for 'Bratz Dolls.' The desert sun beats down, casting long shadows as the children's fascination with the dolls combines with the industrial activity of the pipelayers. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of pipelayers in Nevada and Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Steampunk Oragami Surrealism Voxel art A photo-realistic image
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of pipelayers in Nevada and Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls', in the following situation: Because as the number of pipelayers in Nevada increases, more and more people start to realize the importance of fashionable dolls with attitude, leading to a surge in Bratz Dolls Google searches. It's just basic cause and effect - the more pipeline action, the more doll fascination. It's pipeline power translating into doll demand, plain and simple.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the sprawling Nevada desert, a row of shiny yellow pipelayers stretches across the sandy terrain. As the sun beats down, a group of excited kids gather around, buzzing with curiosity. They pull out their smartphones and start frantically typing in 'Bratz Dolls' into Google, craving to add these fashionable dolls with attitude to their collection. The increasing number of pipelayers has sparked a newfound fascination for Bratz Dolls among the children, creating a unique blend of industrial activity and doll craze in the desert landscape.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In the sprawling Nevada desert, a row of shiny yellow pipelayers stretches across the sandy terrain. As the sun beats down, a group of excited kids gather around, buzzing with curiosity. They pull out their smartphones and start frantically typing in 'Bratz Dolls' into Google, craving to add these fashionable dolls with attitude to their collection. The increasing number of pipelayers has sparked a newfound fascination for Bratz Dolls among the children, creating a unique blend of industrial activity and doll craze in the desert landscape. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate a photo-realistic image of a Nevada desert landscape with a row of glossy yellow pipelayers stretching across the sandy terrain, surrounded by a group of excited children. The children are gathered around the pipelayers, busily using their smartphones to search for 'Bratz Dolls.' The desert sun beats down, casting long shadows as the children's fascination with the dolls combines with the industrial activity of the pipelayers.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of pipelayers in Nevada caused Bratz Dolls (Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls') to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Laying of Pipes and the Purchasing of Dolls: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Pipelayers in Nevada and Google Searches for 'Bratz Dolls'

The Journal of Unconventional Socioeconomic Correlations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of pipelayers in Nevada and Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7936952 and p < 0.01 for 2008 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Laying of Pipes and the Purchasing of Dolls: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Pipelayers in Nevada and Google Searches for 'Bratz Dolls'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the curious connection between the number of pipelayers in Nevada and online interest in 'Bratz Dolls' as reflected by Google searches from 2008 to 2022. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.7936952 and p < 0.01 was calculated, indicating a statistically significant relationship. The findings suggest a potential causal link or, more likely, a humorous quirk in the data that sparks a chuckle from seasoned researchers. Whether pipelayers are taking breaks to indulge their nostalgia for iconic fashion dolls or the search term 'Bratz Dolls' and pipeline work share an unexpected connection is a subject ripe for imaginative speculation. This unexpected correlation, like a pipeline itself, offers a twist and turn amidst the dry terrain of labor and consumer behavior analysis. This study adds a touch of whimsy to the typically serious realm of quantitative research and invites further exploration into the unconventional interplay of labor and consumer trends.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of pipelayers in Nevada and Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Laying of Pipes and the Purchasing of Dolls: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Pipelayers in Nevada and Google Searches for 'Bratz Dolls'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the curious connection between the number of pipelayers in Nevada and online interest in 'Bratz Dolls' as reflected by Google searches from 2008 to 2022. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.7936952 and p < 0.01 was calculated, indicating a statistically significant relationship. The findings suggest a potential causal link or, more likely, a humorous quirk in the data that sparks a chuckle from seasoned researchers. Whether pipelayers are taking breaks to indulge their nostalgia for iconic fashion dolls or the search term 'Bratz Dolls' and pipeline work share an unexpected connection is a subject ripe for imaginative speculation. This unexpected correlation, like a pipeline itself, offers a twist and turn amidst the dry terrain of labor and consumer behavior analysis. This study adds a touch of whimsy to the typically serious realm of quantitative research and invites further exploration into the unconventional interplay of labor and consumer trends.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the realm of quantitative research, where statistical analyses reign supreme and dry data sets dominate the landscape, the occasional unexpected correlation emerges like a burst of color in a grayscale world. It is in this spirit of delightful serendipity that we present our investigation into the correlation between the number of pipelayers in Nevada and the Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls'.

The juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate elements may initially raise an eyebrow or two, perhaps even prompting a sly smirk from those well-versed in the art of data mining. Nevertheless, upon digging into the numbers and trends, a surprising pattern becomes apparent – a correlation coefficient of 0.7936952 and a p-value less than 0.01. These robust statistical measures unmistakably point to a significant relationship between pipelaying and a fondness for 'Bratz Dolls'.

It may seem as improbable as finding a rare Malibu Stacy doll in a construction zone, yet the evidence before us compels us to recognize the existence of a connection, however confounding it may be. Does the clinking of pipes evoke nostalgia for these sassy fashion dolls, inspiring pipelayers to embark on virtual quests for their childhood companions during work breaks? Or is there a more subtle, underground (pun fully intended) dynamic at play, where the demand for pipelayers and the interest in 'Bratz Dolls' intersect in ways that elude conventional understanding?

In the fine tradition of scholarly inquiry, we resist the temptation to hastily settle on a single explanation, instead acknowledging the whimsical allure of this unanticipated correlation. Like the twists and turns of a pipeline snaking through the earth, this unexpected association injects an element of surprise and intrigue into the oftentimes staid domain of labor and consumer behavior analysis. It is as if the data itself were inviting us to consider the interplay of the serious and the playful, the industrial and the whimsical, challenging us to expand our scholarly horizons and embrace the unexpected with an appreciative chuckle.

In the pages that follow, we invite the reader to join us in this lighthearted exploration, with a raised eyebrow, perhaps, but also with a willingness to entertain the possibility that even the most unlikely correlations can reveal something both intriguing and entertaining about the world of quantitative research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of pipelayers in Nevada and Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Laying of Pipes and the Purchasing of Dolls: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Pipelayers in Nevada and Google Searches for 'Bratz Dolls'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the curious connection between the number of pipelayers in Nevada and online interest in 'Bratz Dolls' as reflected by Google searches from 2008 to 2022. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.7936952 and p < 0.01 was calculated, indicating a statistically significant relationship. The findings suggest a potential causal link or, more likely, a humorous quirk in the data that sparks a chuckle from seasoned researchers. Whether pipelayers are taking breaks to indulge their nostalgia for iconic fashion dolls or the search term 'Bratz Dolls' and pipeline work share an unexpected connection is a subject ripe for imaginative speculation. This unexpected correlation, like a pipeline itself, offers a twist and turn amidst the dry terrain of labor and consumer behavior analysis. This study adds a touch of whimsy to the typically serious realm of quantitative research and invites further exploration into the unconventional interplay of labor and consumer trends.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of quantitative research, where statistical analyses reign supreme and dry data sets dominate the landscape, the occasional unexpected correlation emerges like a burst of color in a grayscale world. It is in this spirit of delightful serendipity that we present our investigation into the correlation between the number of pipelayers in Nevada and the Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls'.
The juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate elements may initially raise an eyebrow or two, perhaps even prompting a sly smirk from those well-versed in the art of data mining. Nevertheless, upon digging into the numbers and trends, a surprising pattern becomes apparent – a correlation coefficient of 0.7936952 and a p-value less than 0.01. These robust statistical measures unmistakably point to a significant relationship between pipelaying and a fondness for 'Bratz Dolls'.
It may seem as improbable as finding a rare Malibu Stacy doll in a construction zone, yet the evidence before us compels us to recognize the existence of a connection, however confounding it may be. Does the clinking of pipes evoke nostalgia for these sassy fashion dolls, inspiring pipelayers to embark on virtual quests for their childhood companions during work breaks? Or is there a more subtle, underground (pun fully intended) dynamic at play, where the demand for pipelayers and the interest in 'Bratz Dolls' intersect in ways that elude conventional understanding?
In the fine tradition of scholarly inquiry, we resist the temptation to hastily settle on a single explanation, instead acknowledging the whimsical allure of this unanticipated correlation. Like the twists and turns of a pipeline snaking through the earth, this unexpected association injects an element of surprise and intrigue into the oftentimes staid domain of labor and consumer behavior analysis. It is as if the data itself were inviting us to consider the interplay of the serious and the playful, the industrial and the whimsical, challenging us to expand our scholarly horizons and embrace the unexpected with an appreciative chuckle.
In the pages that follow, we invite the reader to join us in this lighthearted exploration, with a raised eyebrow, perhaps, but also with a willingness to entertain the possibility that even the most unlikely correlations can reveal something both intriguing and entertaining about the world of quantitative research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Numerous studies have delved into the curious world of labor trends and consumer behavior, seeking to unravel unexpected correlations and shed light on the complex interplay of seemingly unrelated variables. In "The Dynamics of Labor and Online Consumer Interest," Smith and Doe (2010) explored the relationship between occupational trends and internet search patterns, uncovering intriguing connections between professions and consumer preferences. Similarly, Jones (2015) investigated the impact of labor dynamics on popular culture, demonstrating how shifts in workforce composition can influence consumer trends and online activity. These serious-minded researchers set the stage for our own investigation into the correlation between the number of pipelayers in Nevada and Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls', offering a framework for interpreting the unexpected relationship between labor and consumer interests.

Turning to non-fiction works, "The Labor Market and Popular Culture" by Brown (2018) and "Consumer Behavior in the Digital Age" by Lee (2013) provide comprehensive analyses of the intricate links between labor trends and consumer behavior, offering valuable insights into the dynamics at play in our own study. On the fictional side, works such as "The Pipelayer's Dilemma" by Johnson (2012) and "Dolls and Daydreams" by Wilson (2016) intriguingly exude potential connections to our research topic, albeit in a more imaginative and whimsical manner.

Beyond the realm of traditional scholarly sources, our literature review extended to unconventional avenues, including the perusal of shampoo bottle labels, where the authors stumbled upon tongue-in-cheek anthropological observations about the correlation between lathering hair with rose-scented shampoo and a sudden urge to revisit childhood toy collections. While not a traditional or recommended method of literature review, this approach yielded unexpected insights and a few amusing anecdotes, underscoring the lighthearted spirit with which we approached our investigation.

As the search for relevant literature expanded into ever more unconventional domains, the authors encountered a text of purportedly ancient provenance titled "Pipes, Dolls, and Other Peculiar Mysteries: A Study of Unlikely Associations" that posited outlandish theories about the mystical connection between labor and childhood playthings. While largely dismissed as fanciful speculation, the tome provided a moment of levity and a reminder that even the most obscure sources can offer a unique perspective on the intersection of labor and consumer trends.

In sum, while the literature review process followed a traditional trajectory of scholarly inquiry, it also wove a tapestry of unexpected connections, offbeat insights, and comical diversions that added a touch of whimsy to the typically staid pursuit of academic research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of pipelayers in Nevada and Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2008 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Laying of Pipes and the Purchasing of Dolls: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Pipelayers in Nevada and Google Searches for 'Bratz Dolls'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the curious connection between the number of pipelayers in Nevada and online interest in 'Bratz Dolls' as reflected by Google searches from 2008 to 2022. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.7936952 and p < 0.01 was calculated, indicating a statistically significant relationship. The findings suggest a potential causal link or, more likely, a humorous quirk in the data that sparks a chuckle from seasoned researchers. Whether pipelayers are taking breaks to indulge their nostalgia for iconic fashion dolls or the search term 'Bratz Dolls' and pipeline work share an unexpected connection is a subject ripe for imaginative speculation. This unexpected correlation, like a pipeline itself, offers a twist and turn amidst the dry terrain of labor and consumer behavior analysis. This study adds a touch of whimsy to the typically serious realm of quantitative research and invites further exploration into the unconventional interplay of labor and consumer trends.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of quantitative research, where statistical analyses reign supreme and dry data sets dominate the landscape, the occasional unexpected correlation emerges like a burst of color in a grayscale world. It is in this spirit of delightful serendipity that we present our investigation into the correlation between the number of pipelayers in Nevada and the Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls'.
The juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate elements may initially raise an eyebrow or two, perhaps even prompting a sly smirk from those well-versed in the art of data mining. Nevertheless, upon digging into the numbers and trends, a surprising pattern becomes apparent – a correlation coefficient of 0.7936952 and a p-value less than 0.01. These robust statistical measures unmistakably point to a significant relationship between pipelaying and a fondness for 'Bratz Dolls'.
It may seem as improbable as finding a rare Malibu Stacy doll in a construction zone, yet the evidence before us compels us to recognize the existence of a connection, however confounding it may be. Does the clinking of pipes evoke nostalgia for these sassy fashion dolls, inspiring pipelayers to embark on virtual quests for their childhood companions during work breaks? Or is there a more subtle, underground (pun fully intended) dynamic at play, where the demand for pipelayers and the interest in 'Bratz Dolls' intersect in ways that elude conventional understanding?
In the fine tradition of scholarly inquiry, we resist the temptation to hastily settle on a single explanation, instead acknowledging the whimsical allure of this unanticipated correlation. Like the twists and turns of a pipeline snaking through the earth, this unexpected association injects an element of surprise and intrigue into the oftentimes staid domain of labor and consumer behavior analysis. It is as if the data itself were inviting us to consider the interplay of the serious and the playful, the industrial and the whimsical, challenging us to expand our scholarly horizons and embrace the unexpected with an appreciative chuckle.
In the pages that follow, we invite the reader to join us in this lighthearted exploration, with a raised eyebrow, perhaps, but also with a willingness to entertain the possibility that even the most unlikely correlations can reveal something both intriguing and entertaining about the world of quantitative research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic connection between the number of pipelayers in Nevada and the fascination with 'Bratz Dolls', we employed a methodological concoction as diverse and intriguing as the research question itself. Our journey into the depths of this unexpected correlation included the use of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the labyrinthine twists and turns of Google Trends.

In our daring quest for insight, we first obtained labor force data pertaining to pipelaying in the picturesque expanse of Nevada, recognizing that these valiant individuals contribute to the vital infrastructure that underlies modern society, much like the sturdy foundations upon which academic research rests. The Bureau of Labor Statistics, a treasure trove of occupational information, provided the necessary figures, and we delved into the depths of this data with the fervor of intrepid explorers, unfurling the digital maps of labor trends before our eyes.

Not content with this terrestrial data alone, we then set our sights on the virtual domain, where the elusive footprints of internet users led us to the captivating realm of Google Trends. Here, we tracked and documented the temporal ebbs and flows of searches for 'Bratz Dolls', recognizing the potential for unexpected connections that lay, perhaps, just beneath the surface of this seemingly innocuous search term. With our trusty keyboards and clicking mice at the ready, we embarked on a digital expedition, traversing the peaks and valleys of internet inquiry in search of correlations that might, like hidden treasures, reveal themselves in due time.

Our endeavor was shaped by the temporal scope of 2008 to 2022, a period marked by societal shifts, technological advancements, and the evolving tastes and preferences of both laborers and consumers. By capturing this broad swath of time, we sought to encompass the diverse landscapes of labor and consumer interests, recognizing that within this span lay the potential for unexpected crossovers, much like stumbling upon a hidden oasis in the vast desert of data analysis.

Pooling data from these disparate sources, we nurtured a statistical garden from which correlations could bloom, or at the very least, where statistical anomalies could elicit a knowing chuckle from seasoned researchers. Employing robust statistical analyses, including correlation coefficients and p-values, we sought to distill the essence of the peculiar relationship between pipelaying and a proclivity for 'Bratz Dolls', recognizing that within the dry terrain of quantitative analysis lay the potential for delightfully unexpected findings.

In a manner befitting the whimsical nature of our research question, our methodology embodied a spirit of adventurous inquiry, embracing the unexpected with a raised eyebrow and a knowing smile. As we unveil the intriguing findings that sprouted from these unorthodox methodological roots, the reader is invited to partake in this scholarly adventure, with a willingness to entertain the unconventional and, perhaps, with a dash of whimsy to flavor the analytical palate.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of pipelayers in Nevada and Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2008 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.7936952, r-squared of 0.6299521, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Laying of Pipes and the Purchasing of Dolls: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Pipelayers in Nevada and Google Searches for 'Bratz Dolls'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the curious connection between the number of pipelayers in Nevada and online interest in 'Bratz Dolls' as reflected by Google searches from 2008 to 2022. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.7936952 and p < 0.01 was calculated, indicating a statistically significant relationship. The findings suggest a potential causal link or, more likely, a humorous quirk in the data that sparks a chuckle from seasoned researchers. Whether pipelayers are taking breaks to indulge their nostalgia for iconic fashion dolls or the search term 'Bratz Dolls' and pipeline work share an unexpected connection is a subject ripe for imaginative speculation. This unexpected correlation, like a pipeline itself, offers a twist and turn amidst the dry terrain of labor and consumer behavior analysis. This study adds a touch of whimsy to the typically serious realm of quantitative research and invites further exploration into the unconventional interplay of labor and consumer trends.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of quantitative research, where statistical analyses reign supreme and dry data sets dominate the landscape, the occasional unexpected correlation emerges like a burst of color in a grayscale world. It is in this spirit of delightful serendipity that we present our investigation into the correlation between the number of pipelayers in Nevada and the Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls'.
The juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate elements may initially raise an eyebrow or two, perhaps even prompting a sly smirk from those well-versed in the art of data mining. Nevertheless, upon digging into the numbers and trends, a surprising pattern becomes apparent – a correlation coefficient of 0.7936952 and a p-value less than 0.01. These robust statistical measures unmistakably point to a significant relationship between pipelaying and a fondness for 'Bratz Dolls'.
It may seem as improbable as finding a rare Malibu Stacy doll in a construction zone, yet the evidence before us compels us to recognize the existence of a connection, however confounding it may be. Does the clinking of pipes evoke nostalgia for these sassy fashion dolls, inspiring pipelayers to embark on virtual quests for their childhood companions during work breaks? Or is there a more subtle, underground (pun fully intended) dynamic at play, where the demand for pipelayers and the interest in 'Bratz Dolls' intersect in ways that elude conventional understanding?
In the fine tradition of scholarly inquiry, we resist the temptation to hastily settle on a single explanation, instead acknowledging the whimsical allure of this unanticipated correlation. Like the twists and turns of a pipeline snaking through the earth, this unexpected association injects an element of surprise and intrigue into the oftentimes staid domain of labor and consumer behavior analysis. It is as if the data itself were inviting us to consider the interplay of the serious and the playful, the industrial and the whimsical, challenging us to expand our scholarly horizons and embrace the unexpected with an appreciative chuckle.
In the pages that follow, we invite the reader to join us in this lighthearted exploration, with a raised eyebrow, perhaps, but also with a willingness to entertain the possibility that even the most unlikely correlations can reveal something both intriguing and entertaining about the world of quantitative research.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The investigation into the relationship between the number of pipelayers in Nevada and Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls' yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.7936952, an r-squared value of 0.6299521, and a p-value less than 0.01. These numerical indices indicate a strong and statistically significant association between the two seemingly unrelated variables, prompting both astonishment and amusement among the research team.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) illustrates the robust correlation between the two variables, with numerous data points clustering in a manner that would likely pique the interest of both labor analysts and doll aficionados alike. It is quite a spectacle to behold, akin to stumbling upon a flowery meadow in the middle of a construction site.

The unexpected correlation is not without its perplexing charm, raising intriguing questions that beckon the imagination. Could it be that the rhythmic lay of pipes somehow evokes a yearning for fashion dolls adorned with avant-garde ensembles, leading to an uptick in 'Bratz Dolls' searches among those working in the pipeline industry? Or perhaps the allure of these dolls mirrors the mechanisms at play in pipeline work, drawing attention to the unique interconnectedness of labor and leisure in the digital age?

These findings not only challenge conventional expectations of labor-consumer dynamics but also inject a dose of levity into the typically somber discourse of quantitative research. Much like finding a hidden treasure trove of collectible dolls in the midst of a construction project, this unexpected correlation infuses an element of whimsy and surprise into the otherwise solemn landscape of empirical analysis.

In summary, the findings of this investigation underscore the potential for unanticipated connections to emerge from the most unlikely of pairings, inviting future explorations and prompting a playful reconsideration of the intricate relationships that underscore our socioeconomic fabric. This unexpected correlation, much like a delightful inside joke in the world of research, encourages scholars to embrace the unexpected with a knowing smile and a healthy dose of curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of pipelayers in Nevada and Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Laying of Pipes and the Purchasing of Dolls: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Pipelayers in Nevada and Google Searches for 'Bratz Dolls'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the curious connection between the number of pipelayers in Nevada and online interest in 'Bratz Dolls' as reflected by Google searches from 2008 to 2022. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.7936952 and p < 0.01 was calculated, indicating a statistically significant relationship. The findings suggest a potential causal link or, more likely, a humorous quirk in the data that sparks a chuckle from seasoned researchers. Whether pipelayers are taking breaks to indulge their nostalgia for iconic fashion dolls or the search term 'Bratz Dolls' and pipeline work share an unexpected connection is a subject ripe for imaginative speculation. This unexpected correlation, like a pipeline itself, offers a twist and turn amidst the dry terrain of labor and consumer behavior analysis. This study adds a touch of whimsy to the typically serious realm of quantitative research and invites further exploration into the unconventional interplay of labor and consumer trends.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Numerous studies have delved into the curious world of labor trends and consumer behavior, seeking to unravel unexpected correlations and shed light on the complex interplay of seemingly unrelated variables. In "The Dynamics of Labor and Online Consumer Interest," Smith and Doe (2010) explored the relationship between occupational trends and internet search patterns, uncovering intriguing connections between professions and consumer preferences. Similarly, Jones (2015) investigated the impact of labor dynamics on popular culture, demonstrating how shifts in workforce composition can influence consumer trends and online activity. These serious-minded researchers set the stage for our own investigation into the correlation between the number of pipelayers in Nevada and Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls', offering a framework for interpreting the unexpected relationship between labor and consumer interests.
Turning to non-fiction works, "The Labor Market and Popular Culture" by Brown (2018) and "Consumer Behavior in the Digital Age" by Lee (2013) provide comprehensive analyses of the intricate links between labor trends and consumer behavior, offering valuable insights into the dynamics at play in our own study. On the fictional side, works such as "The Pipelayer's Dilemma" by Johnson (2012) and "Dolls and Daydreams" by Wilson (2016) intriguingly exude potential connections to our research topic, albeit in a more imaginative and whimsical manner.
Beyond the realm of traditional scholarly sources, our literature review extended to unconventional avenues, including the perusal of shampoo bottle labels, where the authors stumbled upon tongue-in-cheek anthropological observations about the correlation between lathering hair with rose-scented shampoo and a sudden urge to revisit childhood toy collections. While not a traditional or recommended method of literature review, this approach yielded unexpected insights and a few amusing anecdotes, underscoring the lighthearted spirit with which we approached our investigation.
As the search for relevant literature expanded into ever more unconventional domains, the authors encountered a text of purportedly ancient provenance titled "Pipes, Dolls, and Other Peculiar Mysteries: A Study of Unlikely Associations" that posited outlandish theories about the mystical connection between labor and childhood playthings. While largely dismissed as fanciful speculation, the tome provided a moment of levity and a reminder that even the most obscure sources can offer a unique perspective on the intersection of labor and consumer trends.
In sum, while the literature review process followed a traditional trajectory of scholarly inquiry, it also wove a tapestry of unexpected connections, offbeat insights, and comical diversions that added a touch of whimsy to the typically staid pursuit of academic research.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the relationship between the number of pipelayers in Nevada and Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls' yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.7936952, an r-squared value of 0.6299521, and a p-value less than 0.01. These numerical indices indicate a strong and statistically significant association between the two seemingly unrelated variables, prompting both astonishment and amusement among the research team.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) illustrates the robust correlation between the two variables, with numerous data points clustering in a manner that would likely pique the interest of both labor analysts and doll aficionados alike. It is quite a spectacle to behold, akin to stumbling upon a flowery meadow in the middle of a construction site.
The unexpected correlation is not without its perplexing charm, raising intriguing questions that beckon the imagination. Could it be that the rhythmic lay of pipes somehow evokes a yearning for fashion dolls adorned with avant-garde ensembles, leading to an uptick in 'Bratz Dolls' searches among those working in the pipeline industry? Or perhaps the allure of these dolls mirrors the mechanisms at play in pipeline work, drawing attention to the unique interconnectedness of labor and leisure in the digital age?
These findings not only challenge conventional expectations of labor-consumer dynamics but also inject a dose of levity into the typically somber discourse of quantitative research. Much like finding a hidden treasure trove of collectible dolls in the midst of a construction project, this unexpected correlation infuses an element of whimsy and surprise into the otherwise solemn landscape of empirical analysis.
In summary, the findings of this investigation underscore the potential for unanticipated connections to emerge from the most unlikely of pairings, inviting future explorations and prompting a playful reconsideration of the intricate relationships that underscore our socioeconomic fabric. This unexpected correlation, much like a delightful inside joke in the world of research, encourages scholars to embrace the unexpected with a knowing smile and a healthy dose of curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study provide compelling evidence for an unexpected yet intriguing connection between the number of pipelayers in Nevada and Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls'. This correlation, while initially bewildering, aligns with previous research findings that have explored the peculiar interplay between labor dynamics and online consumer behavior. Smith and Doe (2010) set the stage for our investigation by uncovering surprising links between occupational trends and internet search patterns. Their work, while serious in nature, laid the groundwork for the discovery of equally enigmatic associations, although they might not have expected their research to inspire chuckles and raised eyebrows.

The literature review, which combed through traditional and unconventional sources, unearthed intriguing connections and amusing diversions. Notably, the perusal of shampoo bottle labels and encounters with semi-fictitious texts shed light on the unexpected whimsy inherent in the nexus of labor and consumer trends. While these sources might not be of conventional scholarly stock, they provided a quirky lens through which to view the intersection of labor and leisure.

The rambunctiously high correlation coefficient and p-value less than 0.01 unearthed in our study not only validate previous observations but also thrust a comically exaggerated spotlight on the interconnectedness of labor and consumer trends, much like a particularly bold outfit adorning a 'Bratz Doll'. The robust nature of the correlation, akin to the steady lay of pipes in a construction site, elicits both admiration and amusement.

Our findings challenge the traditional expectations of labor-consumer dynamics, infusing a touch of levity into the typically grave discourse of quantitative research. Much like a secret handshake shared among those let in on the joke, this unexpected correlation beckons future research endeavors with a wink and a nudge, encouraging scholars to approach the intersection of labor and consumer trends with a dash of curiosity and a dollop of humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of pipelayers in Nevada and Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Laying of Pipes and the Purchasing of Dolls: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Pipelayers in Nevada and Google Searches for 'Bratz Dolls'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the curious connection between the number of pipelayers in Nevada and online interest in 'Bratz Dolls' as reflected by Google searches from 2008 to 2022. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.7936952 and p < 0.01 was calculated, indicating a statistically significant relationship. The findings suggest a potential causal link or, more likely, a humorous quirk in the data that sparks a chuckle from seasoned researchers. Whether pipelayers are taking breaks to indulge their nostalgia for iconic fashion dolls or the search term 'Bratz Dolls' and pipeline work share an unexpected connection is a subject ripe for imaginative speculation. This unexpected correlation, like a pipeline itself, offers a twist and turn amidst the dry terrain of labor and consumer behavior analysis. This study adds a touch of whimsy to the typically serious realm of quantitative research and invites further exploration into the unconventional interplay of labor and consumer trends.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of quantitative research, where statistical analyses reign supreme and dry data sets dominate the landscape, the occasional unexpected correlation emerges like a burst of color in a grayscale world. It is in this spirit of delightful serendipity that we present our investigation into the correlation between the number of pipelayers in Nevada and the Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls'.
The juxtaposition of these seemingly disparate elements may initially raise an eyebrow or two, perhaps even prompting a sly smirk from those well-versed in the art of data mining. Nevertheless, upon digging into the numbers and trends, a surprising pattern becomes apparent – a correlation coefficient of 0.7936952 and a p-value less than 0.01. These robust statistical measures unmistakably point to a significant relationship between pipelaying and a fondness for 'Bratz Dolls'.
It may seem as improbable as finding a rare Malibu Stacy doll in a construction zone, yet the evidence before us compels us to recognize the existence of a connection, however confounding it may be. Does the clinking of pipes evoke nostalgia for these sassy fashion dolls, inspiring pipelayers to embark on virtual quests for their childhood companions during work breaks? Or is there a more subtle, underground (pun fully intended) dynamic at play, where the demand for pipelayers and the interest in 'Bratz Dolls' intersect in ways that elude conventional understanding?
In the fine tradition of scholarly inquiry, we resist the temptation to hastily settle on a single explanation, instead acknowledging the whimsical allure of this unanticipated correlation. Like the twists and turns of a pipeline snaking through the earth, this unexpected association injects an element of surprise and intrigue into the oftentimes staid domain of labor and consumer behavior analysis. It is as if the data itself were inviting us to consider the interplay of the serious and the playful, the industrial and the whimsical, challenging us to expand our scholarly horizons and embrace the unexpected with an appreciative chuckle.
In the pages that follow, we invite the reader to join us in this lighthearted exploration, with a raised eyebrow, perhaps, but also with a willingness to entertain the possibility that even the most unlikely correlations can reveal something both intriguing and entertaining about the world of quantitative research.

[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the relationship between the number of pipelayers in Nevada and Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls' yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.7936952, an r-squared value of 0.6299521, and a p-value less than 0.01. These numerical indices indicate a strong and statistically significant association between the two seemingly unrelated variables, prompting both astonishment and amusement among the research team.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) illustrates the robust correlation between the two variables, with numerous data points clustering in a manner that would likely pique the interest of both labor analysts and doll aficionados alike. It is quite a spectacle to behold, akin to stumbling upon a flowery meadow in the middle of a construction site.
The unexpected correlation is not without its perplexing charm, raising intriguing questions that beckon the imagination. Could it be that the rhythmic lay of pipes somehow evokes a yearning for fashion dolls adorned with avant-garde ensembles, leading to an uptick in 'Bratz Dolls' searches among those working in the pipeline industry? Or perhaps the allure of these dolls mirrors the mechanisms at play in pipeline work, drawing attention to the unique interconnectedness of labor and leisure in the digital age?
These findings not only challenge conventional expectations of labor-consumer dynamics but also inject a dose of levity into the typically somber discourse of quantitative research. Much like finding a hidden treasure trove of collectible dolls in the midst of a construction project, this unexpected correlation infuses an element of whimsy and surprise into the otherwise solemn landscape of empirical analysis.
In summary, the findings of this investigation underscore the potential for unanticipated connections to emerge from the most unlikely of pairings, inviting future explorations and prompting a playful reconsideration of the intricate relationships that underscore our socioeconomic fabric. This unexpected correlation, much like a delightful inside joke in the world of research, encourages scholars to embrace the unexpected with a knowing smile and a healthy dose of curiosity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the investigation into the surprising relationship between the number of pipelayers in Nevada and Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls' has yielded results that are as puzzling as finding a wind-up toy amidst a collection of concrete mixers. The robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value indicate a connection that demands attention, as perplexing as spotting a Barbie in a hard hat.

This unexpected correlation, reminiscent of a whimsical Easter egg in the domain of quantitative research, urges us to celebrate the unexpected and embrace the interplay of the serious and the playful. Whether pipelayers are taking a break from their laborious duties to indulge in nostalgic doll-related searches or whether the fascination with 'Bratz Dolls' and pipeline work share an underground, yet to be unearthed, relationship, the data invites us to revel in the humor of the unconventional.

As such, we firmly assert that further research in this area is unnecessary; after all, it's not every day that academic inquiry presents researchers with such an amusing and enigmatic conundrum. In the spirit of scholarly whimsy, let us bid adieu to this peculiar correlation, rejoicing in the recognition that even in the most unlikely of pairings, unexpected delights and laughter can be found.

With a gentle nod to the inexplicable and a chuckle at the unusual, we commend this delightful divergence from the ordinary to future scholars, urging them to approach their own research with an open mind and a willingness to find joy in the unanticipated.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Laying of Pipes and the Purchasing of Dolls: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Pipelayers in Nevada and Google Searches for 'Bratz Dolls'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Unconventional Socioeconomic Correlations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Laying of Pipes and the Purchasing of Dolls: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Pipelayers in Nevada and Google Searches for 'Bratz Dolls'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Social Infrastructure and Consumer Behavior Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Laying of Pipes and the Purchasing of Dolls: An Analysis of the Relationship Between Pipelayers in Nevada and Google Searches for 'Bratz Dolls' with an abstract of This study examines the curious connection between the number of pipelayers in Nevada and online interest in 'Bratz Dolls' as reflected by Google searches from 2008 to 2022. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, a correlation coefficient of 0.7936952 and p < 0.01 was calculated, indicating a statistically significant relationship. The findings suggest a potential causal link or, more likely, a humorous quirk in the data that sparks a chuckle from seasoned researchers. Whether pipelayers are taking breaks to indulge their nostalgia for iconic fashion dolls or the search term 'Bratz Dolls' and pipeline work share an unexpected connection is a subject ripe for imaginative speculation. This unexpected correlation, like a pipeline itself, offers a twist and turn amidst the dry terrain of labor and consumer behavior analysis. This study adds a touch of whimsy to the typically serious realm of quantitative research and invites further exploration into the unconventional interplay of labor and consumer trends.

ChatGPT:

pipelayers, Nevada, Google searches, Bratz Dolls, correlation coefficient, online interest, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Google Trends, labor trends, consumer behavior, quantitative research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of pipelayers in Nevada
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of pipelayers in Nevada
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of pipelayers in Nevada

Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls'

Correlation r = 0.7936952 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6299521 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 63% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of pipelayers in Nevada) over the 15 years from 2008 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00041. 0.0004119945889865071400000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.79 in 0.041% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,427 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.47, 0.93 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of pipelayers in Nevada (Pipelayers)84072051033013016014011070804306001010440630
Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls' (Rel. search volume)47.333329.833323.583319.666719.7515.751424.666718.916720.833321.833333.083342.833345.7540.1667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([840,720,510,330,130,160,140,110,70,80,430,600,1010,440,630,])
array_2 = np.array([47.3333,29.8333,23.5833,19.6667,19.75,15.75,14,24.6667,18.9167,20.8333,21.8333,33.0833,42.8333,45.75,40.1667,])
array_1_name = "The number of pipelayers in Nevada"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'Bratz Dolls'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 3292 · Black Variable ID: 11235 · Red Variable ID: 1416
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0