about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,286 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and the second variable is xkcd comics published about wikipedia.  The chart goes from 2007 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As Lukas Podolski scores more in domestic matches, he boosts the overall morale of soccer fans. This increase in happiness leads to a higher frequency of internet usage, particularly on websites like Wikipedia. With more people visiting Wikipedia, there is a rise in the demand for quirky and informative xkcd comics about the online encyclopedia. This surge in interest prompts the creators to publish more xkcd comics about Wikipedia, creating a positive feedback loop of soccer-inspired wiki humor. So, in a way, Podolski's goal-scoring prowess indirectly contributes to the production of xkcd comics about Wikipedia.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a vibrant image that captures the electrifying atmosphere of a bustling soccer stadium as Lukas Podolski exhilarates the crowd with a series of unforgettable goals. The spectators are filled with joy and unity, their faces illuminated by the radiant glow of celebration. Meanwhile, in a distant office, the creator of xkcd comics is surrounded by cosmic waves of positivity, channeling the infectious energy from the stadium into a lively burst of inspiration. The connection between these two scenes is portrayed through a subtle thread of intertwined creativity and humor, symbolizing the profound impact of positivity across different spheres. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and xkcd comics published about wikipedia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic A Discovery magazine cover image 3D Pixar Style An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie A TIME magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and xkcd comics published about wikipedia, in the following situation: Changes in Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count caused xkcd comics published about wikipedia because as Podolski's goals increased, it created a surge of positive energy in the universe, which inspired the xkcd creator to find humor in wikipedia topics, leading to an influx of wiki-themed comics. This positive energy was then converted into puns, resulting in a chain reaction of comic creativity.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Imagine an invigorating soccer stadium buzzing with excitement as Lukas Podolski scores goal after goal. Each time he adds to his domestic match goal count, a burst of positive energy ripples through the crowd. Simultaneously, in a far-off office, the creator of xkcd comics becomes increasingly inspired by the cosmic wave of positivity and starts crafting witty jokes about Wikipedia topics. The scenes are linked by the invisible thread of positive energy, as the soccer stadium and the creator's workspace become intertwined in a delightful dance of creativity and humor.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: Imagine an invigorating soccer stadium buzzing with excitement as Lukas Podolski scores goal after goal. Each time he adds to his domestic match goal count, a burst of positive energy ripples through the crowd. Simultaneously, in a far-off office, the creator of xkcd comics becomes increasingly inspired by the cosmic wave of positivity and starts crafting witty jokes about Wikipedia topics. The scenes are linked by the invisible thread of positive energy, as the soccer stadium and the creator's workspace become intertwined in a delightful dance of creativity and humor. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a vibrant image that captures the electrifying atmosphere of a bustling soccer stadium as Lukas Podolski exhilarates the crowd with a series of unforgettable goals. The spectators are filled with joy and unity, their faces illuminated by the radiant glow of celebration. Meanwhile, in a distant office, the creator of xkcd comics is surrounded by cosmic waves of positivity, channeling the infectious energy from the stadium into a lively burst of inspiration. The connection between these two scenes is portrayed through a subtle thread of intertwined creativity and humor, symbolizing the profound impact of positivity across different spheres.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count positively influenced xkcd comics published about wikipedia.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Striking Connections: Lukas Podolski's Goal-Scoring Prowess and xkcd Wiki-wonders

The Journal of Sports Analytics and Internet Culture

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and xkcd comics published about wikipedia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and AI analysis of xkcd comics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6745834 and p < 0.01 for 2007 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Striking Connections: Lukas Podolski's Goal-Scoring Prowess and xkcd Wiki-wonders

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the whimsical intersection of Lukas Podolski's prolific goal-scoring in domestic matches and the enchanting world of xkcd comics dedicated to Wikipedia. Our research delves into the unlikely correlation between the two seemingly unrelated subjects, tapping into the amusing realms of sports and internet humor. Through rigorous statistical analysis and AI scrutiny of xkcd comics, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6745834 and p < 0.01 for the time span of 2007 to 2022. The unexpected link between Podolski's net-rippling exploits and the witticisms depicted in xkcd comics offers a delightful fusion of sports and pop culture, inviting a playful exploration of their interconnectedness. This investigation not only sheds light on the comical undertones of data analysis but also provides a lighthearted lens through which to view the curious convergences of diverse subjects.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and xkcd comics published about wikipedia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Striking Connections: Lukas Podolski's Goal-Scoring Prowess and xkcd Wiki-wonders

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the whimsical intersection of Lukas Podolski's prolific goal-scoring in domestic matches and the enchanting world of xkcd comics dedicated to Wikipedia. Our research delves into the unlikely correlation between the two seemingly unrelated subjects, tapping into the amusing realms of sports and internet humor. Through rigorous statistical analysis and AI scrutiny of xkcd comics, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6745834 and p < 0.01 for the time span of 2007 to 2022. The unexpected link between Podolski's net-rippling exploits and the witticisms depicted in xkcd comics offers a delightful fusion of sports and pop culture, inviting a playful exploration of their interconnectedness. This investigation not only sheds light on the comical undertones of data analysis but also provides a lighthearted lens through which to view the curious convergences of diverse subjects.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction:

In the baffling, yet delightful world of research, unexpected connections often emerge in the most curious of places. It is with this lighthearted sense of intrigue that we embark on an investigation into the whimsical intersection of Lukas Podolski's goal-scoring prowess and the enchanting world of xkcd comics dedicated to Wikipedia. As researchers, we typically find ourselves grappling with weighty matters, delving into complex equations, and grappling with mind-bending statistical analyses. However, the allure of uncovering the connection between a footballer's net-rippling exploits and the witticisms depicted in xkcd comics presents a welcome diversion from the norm – an irresistible opportunity to blend sports and pop culture in a playful exploration of their interconnectedness.

The idea that the prodigious goal-scoring of Lukas Podolski in domestic matches could be in any way linked to the irreverent and often nerdy humor found in xkcd comics may seem at first glance as improbable as finding a statistical outlier in a sea of mundane data points. However, as we have learned from our forays into the realms of science and research, the most peculiar connections can often be the most rewarding to explore. It is in this spirit of scholarly whimsy that we venture forth to shed light on this unexpected combination, offering a refreshing twist in our examination of statistical relationships and uncovering correlations that may seem as surprising as encountering a unicorn in a data set.

Embracing the challenge of unearthing hilarity within our statistical analyses, we have sought to apply rigorous methods to ascertain the degree of correlation between Podolski's dynamic goal-scoring and the amusing illustrations of xkcd comics. Our investigation has involved an array of statistical tools, AI scrutiny of xkcd comics, and a liberal sprinkling of puns and jokes to keep our spirits light amidst the serious business of research. The aim is not only to uncover the unlikely connection but also to showcase the comical undertones of data analysis, offering a fresh perspective on the intertwining of seemingly disparate subjects. As we embark on this jocular journey, we invite our readers to join us in uncovering the delightfully unexpected correlations and connections that can be found in the most serendipitous of places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and xkcd comics published about wikipedia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Striking Connections: Lukas Podolski's Goal-Scoring Prowess and xkcd Wiki-wonders

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the whimsical intersection of Lukas Podolski's prolific goal-scoring in domestic matches and the enchanting world of xkcd comics dedicated to Wikipedia. Our research delves into the unlikely correlation between the two seemingly unrelated subjects, tapping into the amusing realms of sports and internet humor. Through rigorous statistical analysis and AI scrutiny of xkcd comics, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6745834 and p < 0.01 for the time span of 2007 to 2022. The unexpected link between Podolski's net-rippling exploits and the witticisms depicted in xkcd comics offers a delightful fusion of sports and pop culture, inviting a playful exploration of their interconnectedness. This investigation not only sheds light on the comical undertones of data analysis but also provides a lighthearted lens through which to view the curious convergences of diverse subjects.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction:
In the baffling, yet delightful world of research, unexpected connections often emerge in the most curious of places. It is with this lighthearted sense of intrigue that we embark on an investigation into the whimsical intersection of Lukas Podolski's goal-scoring prowess and the enchanting world of xkcd comics dedicated to Wikipedia. As researchers, we typically find ourselves grappling with weighty matters, delving into complex equations, and grappling with mind-bending statistical analyses. However, the allure of uncovering the connection between a footballer's net-rippling exploits and the witticisms depicted in xkcd comics presents a welcome diversion from the norm – an irresistible opportunity to blend sports and pop culture in a playful exploration of their interconnectedness.
The idea that the prodigious goal-scoring of Lukas Podolski in domestic matches could be in any way linked to the irreverent and often nerdy humor found in xkcd comics may seem at first glance as improbable as finding a statistical outlier in a sea of mundane data points. However, as we have learned from our forays into the realms of science and research, the most peculiar connections can often be the most rewarding to explore. It is in this spirit of scholarly whimsy that we venture forth to shed light on this unexpected combination, offering a refreshing twist in our examination of statistical relationships and uncovering correlations that may seem as surprising as encountering a unicorn in a data set.
Embracing the challenge of unearthing hilarity within our statistical analyses, we have sought to apply rigorous methods to ascertain the degree of correlation between Podolski's dynamic goal-scoring and the amusing illustrations of xkcd comics. Our investigation has involved an array of statistical tools, AI scrutiny of xkcd comics, and a liberal sprinkling of puns and jokes to keep our spirits light amidst the serious business of research. The aim is not only to uncover the unlikely connection but also to showcase the comical undertones of data analysis, offering a fresh perspective on the intertwining of seemingly disparate subjects. As we embark on this jocular journey, we invite our readers to join us in uncovering the delightfully unexpected correlations and connections that can be found in the most serendipitous of places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

To fully comprehend the perplexing yet amusing correlation between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and xkcd comics published about Wikipedia, a comprehensive review of the literature is necessary. Our exploration into these delightfully divergent realms will draw upon a range of sources, from the scholarly and rigorous to the whimsically speculative. We begin with seminal works by esteemed researchers such as Smith, Doe, and Jones, providing a foundational understanding of statistical analyses and unexpected correlations.

In "The Statistical Significance of Soccer Sensations," Smith et al. elucidate the intricacies of gauging the statistical significance of goal-scoring prowess in relation to various unexpected variables, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the enigmatic link between Podolski's net-rippling feats and the quirks of xkcd comics. Following this, Doe's seminal paper, "Unconventional Correlations: From Quirky to Quantifiable," offers a compelling framework for exploring the whimsical connections that often lurk beneath the surface of data analysis.

Moving beyond the confines of traditional research, a foray into non-fiction literature yields intriguing insights. "The Wikipedia Revolution" by Andrew Lih provides a captivating exploration of the evolution of Wikipedia, laying the groundwork for understanding the cultural impact that xkcd comics may have on the digital landscape. Furthermore, "Soccernomics" by Simon Kuper and Stefan Szymanski invites readers to consider the offbeat connections between economic principles and the beautiful game, offering a refreshing perspective on analyzing unconventional relationships.

Venturing into the realm of fiction, the works of Douglas Adams, particularly "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy," beckon us toward a whimsical exploration of improbable connections and the absurdity of statistical anomalies. Similarly, the offbeat world of Jasper Fforde's "Thursday Next" series sparks the imagination, hinting at the possibility of surreal links between sports and esoteric humor.

In a comedic turn, our literature review strays into the realm of the absurd, drawing inspiration from unexpected sources. The perusal of shampoo bottle labels, while ostensibly unrelated to our research, brought unexpected levity to our investigation and may have inadvertently contributed to our lighthearted approach to uncovering correlations. The tangential yet amusing insights gleaned from these unconventional sources served to further bolster our resolve in embracing playful exploration and seeking amusement in unexpected places.

As we wade through the conventional, the imaginative, and the outright ridiculous, the literature review sets the stage for a vibrant and eclectic exploration of the peculiar entanglement of Podolski's prolific goal-scoring prowess and the zany charm of xkcd comics. With this multifaceted foundation, we embark on our analytical escapade, aiming to uncover correlations as elusive as a cleverly concealed punchline in a dense thicket of data.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and xkcd comics published about wikipedia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and AI analysis of xkcd comics . You used data from 2007 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Striking Connections: Lukas Podolski's Goal-Scoring Prowess and xkcd Wiki-wonders

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the whimsical intersection of Lukas Podolski's prolific goal-scoring in domestic matches and the enchanting world of xkcd comics dedicated to Wikipedia. Our research delves into the unlikely correlation between the two seemingly unrelated subjects, tapping into the amusing realms of sports and internet humor. Through rigorous statistical analysis and AI scrutiny of xkcd comics, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6745834 and p < 0.01 for the time span of 2007 to 2022. The unexpected link between Podolski's net-rippling exploits and the witticisms depicted in xkcd comics offers a delightful fusion of sports and pop culture, inviting a playful exploration of their interconnectedness. This investigation not only sheds light on the comical undertones of data analysis but also provides a lighthearted lens through which to view the curious convergences of diverse subjects.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction:
In the baffling, yet delightful world of research, unexpected connections often emerge in the most curious of places. It is with this lighthearted sense of intrigue that we embark on an investigation into the whimsical intersection of Lukas Podolski's goal-scoring prowess and the enchanting world of xkcd comics dedicated to Wikipedia. As researchers, we typically find ourselves grappling with weighty matters, delving into complex equations, and grappling with mind-bending statistical analyses. However, the allure of uncovering the connection between a footballer's net-rippling exploits and the witticisms depicted in xkcd comics presents a welcome diversion from the norm – an irresistible opportunity to blend sports and pop culture in a playful exploration of their interconnectedness.
The idea that the prodigious goal-scoring of Lukas Podolski in domestic matches could be in any way linked to the irreverent and often nerdy humor found in xkcd comics may seem at first glance as improbable as finding a statistical outlier in a sea of mundane data points. However, as we have learned from our forays into the realms of science and research, the most peculiar connections can often be the most rewarding to explore. It is in this spirit of scholarly whimsy that we venture forth to shed light on this unexpected combination, offering a refreshing twist in our examination of statistical relationships and uncovering correlations that may seem as surprising as encountering a unicorn in a data set.
Embracing the challenge of unearthing hilarity within our statistical analyses, we have sought to apply rigorous methods to ascertain the degree of correlation between Podolski's dynamic goal-scoring and the amusing illustrations of xkcd comics. Our investigation has involved an array of statistical tools, AI scrutiny of xkcd comics, and a liberal sprinkling of puns and jokes to keep our spirits light amidst the serious business of research. The aim is not only to uncover the unlikely connection but also to showcase the comical undertones of data analysis, offering a fresh perspective on the intertwining of seemingly disparate subjects. As we embark on this jocular journey, we invite our readers to join us in uncovering the delightfully unexpected correlations and connections that can be found in the most serendipitous of places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the delightful nexus of Lukas Podolski's goal-scoring acumen and the whimsical world of xkcd comics, our research team embarked on an exhilarating journey that traversed the realms of statistical analysis, AI scrutiny, and a dash of playful experimentation.

First and foremost, we meticulously compiled a comprehensive dataset spanning from 2007 to 2022, capturing every instance of Lukas Podolski's goal-scoring escapades in domestic matches. Our data collection process involved scouring through various sports archives, embracing the doodles of math and mathematics in the quest for every goal that graced Podolski's illustrious career. We made sure to account for the quirks of different leagues, teasing apart the goals with as much precision as dissecting the convoluted and often perplexing references in xkcd comics.

In parallel, the analysis of xkcd comics dedicated to Wikipedia relied on a rather unconventional approach. Using state-of-the-art AI algorithms, we deployed a specialized program humorously named "WickiLex," designed to identify and categorize any instance of Wikipedia representation mentioned in xkcd comics. The AI scrutiny involved interpreting visual cues, textual references, and even parsing through the subtext of nerdiness to promptly identify those instances where the venn diagram of sports and internet humor unexpectedly overlapped.

Once armed with our datasets, we unleashed a barrage of statistical analyses to unravel the mysterious correlation between Podolski's goal-scoring exploits and the esoteric musings of xkcd comics. Leveraging cutting-edge software, we calculated correlation coefficients, subjected the data to regression analysis, and even performed a few dance moves - just to ensure the spirits were kept lively and the statistical outliers remained on their toes.

In the spirit of embracing whimsy, we also interspersed our analyses with lighthearted banter, thought-provoking puns, and tongue-in-cheek observations. This not only lent an air of joviality to our research but also provided an avenue for nimbly navigating the labyrinthine complexities of statistical modeling.

In summary, our methodology encompassed a spirited amalgamation of rigorous data collection, AI scrutiny, statistical wizardry, and an unyielding commitment to keeping the research process engaging and, dare I say, a bit cheeky. This holistic approach facilitated the unearthing of the unforeseen correlation between Podolski's goal-scoring prowess and the wry witticisms of xkcd comics, offering a playful lens through which to view the convergence of sports and pop culture.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and xkcd comics published about wikipedia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and AI analysis of xkcd comics .

For the time period 2007 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.6745834, r-squared of 0.4550628, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Striking Connections: Lukas Podolski's Goal-Scoring Prowess and xkcd Wiki-wonders

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the whimsical intersection of Lukas Podolski's prolific goal-scoring in domestic matches and the enchanting world of xkcd comics dedicated to Wikipedia. Our research delves into the unlikely correlation between the two seemingly unrelated subjects, tapping into the amusing realms of sports and internet humor. Through rigorous statistical analysis and AI scrutiny of xkcd comics, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6745834 and p < 0.01 for the time span of 2007 to 2022. The unexpected link between Podolski's net-rippling exploits and the witticisms depicted in xkcd comics offers a delightful fusion of sports and pop culture, inviting a playful exploration of their interconnectedness. This investigation not only sheds light on the comical undertones of data analysis but also provides a lighthearted lens through which to view the curious convergences of diverse subjects.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction:
In the baffling, yet delightful world of research, unexpected connections often emerge in the most curious of places. It is with this lighthearted sense of intrigue that we embark on an investigation into the whimsical intersection of Lukas Podolski's goal-scoring prowess and the enchanting world of xkcd comics dedicated to Wikipedia. As researchers, we typically find ourselves grappling with weighty matters, delving into complex equations, and grappling with mind-bending statistical analyses. However, the allure of uncovering the connection between a footballer's net-rippling exploits and the witticisms depicted in xkcd comics presents a welcome diversion from the norm – an irresistible opportunity to blend sports and pop culture in a playful exploration of their interconnectedness.
The idea that the prodigious goal-scoring of Lukas Podolski in domestic matches could be in any way linked to the irreverent and often nerdy humor found in xkcd comics may seem at first glance as improbable as finding a statistical outlier in a sea of mundane data points. However, as we have learned from our forays into the realms of science and research, the most peculiar connections can often be the most rewarding to explore. It is in this spirit of scholarly whimsy that we venture forth to shed light on this unexpected combination, offering a refreshing twist in our examination of statistical relationships and uncovering correlations that may seem as surprising as encountering a unicorn in a data set.
Embracing the challenge of unearthing hilarity within our statistical analyses, we have sought to apply rigorous methods to ascertain the degree of correlation between Podolski's dynamic goal-scoring and the amusing illustrations of xkcd comics. Our investigation has involved an array of statistical tools, AI scrutiny of xkcd comics, and a liberal sprinkling of puns and jokes to keep our spirits light amidst the serious business of research. The aim is not only to uncover the unlikely connection but also to showcase the comical undertones of data analysis, offering a fresh perspective on the intertwining of seemingly disparate subjects. As we embark on this jocular journey, we invite our readers to join us in uncovering the delightfully unexpected correlations and connections that can be found in the most serendipitous of places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our whimsical investigation into the connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and xkcd comics published about Wikipedia have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6745834, an r-squared of 0.4550628, and a p-value of less than 0.01. If you're not familiar with statistical mumbo jumbo, those numbers basically signify a pretty solid relationship between Podolski's goal-scoring prowess and the nerdy, yet hilarious, world of xkcd comics.

To visually capture the sheer hilarity of this improbable connection, we present our scatterplot (Fig. 1) that vividly illustrates the strong correlation between the two variables. It's a graph that manages to evoke both the thrill of a last-minute goal and the whimsical charm of a clever comic strip. Who knew statistics could be so... fun?

While the unexpected link between Podolski's net-rippling exploits and the brainy humor of xkcd might seem as probable as finding a needle in a haystack, our findings add another twist to the wonderful, wacky world of data analysis. This investigation not only brings a smile to the faces of research-worn scholars but also offers a delightful fusion of sports and pop culture, proving that statistical relationships can be as surprising as discovering a unicorn in a data set (or Bigfoot in a forest, whichever you fancy).

In summary, our results provide a lighthearted lens through which to view the curious convergences of diverse subjects, reminding us that even in the serious business of research, there's always room for a good laugh or an unexpected twist.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and xkcd comics published about wikipedia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Striking Connections: Lukas Podolski's Goal-Scoring Prowess and xkcd Wiki-wonders

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the whimsical intersection of Lukas Podolski's prolific goal-scoring in domestic matches and the enchanting world of xkcd comics dedicated to Wikipedia. Our research delves into the unlikely correlation between the two seemingly unrelated subjects, tapping into the amusing realms of sports and internet humor. Through rigorous statistical analysis and AI scrutiny of xkcd comics, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6745834 and p < 0.01 for the time span of 2007 to 2022. The unexpected link between Podolski's net-rippling exploits and the witticisms depicted in xkcd comics offers a delightful fusion of sports and pop culture, inviting a playful exploration of their interconnectedness. This investigation not only sheds light on the comical undertones of data analysis but also provides a lighthearted lens through which to view the curious convergences of diverse subjects.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
To fully comprehend the perplexing yet amusing correlation between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and xkcd comics published about Wikipedia, a comprehensive review of the literature is necessary. Our exploration into these delightfully divergent realms will draw upon a range of sources, from the scholarly and rigorous to the whimsically speculative. We begin with seminal works by esteemed researchers such as Smith, Doe, and Jones, providing a foundational understanding of statistical analyses and unexpected correlations.
In "The Statistical Significance of Soccer Sensations," Smith et al. elucidate the intricacies of gauging the statistical significance of goal-scoring prowess in relation to various unexpected variables, laying the groundwork for our investigation into the enigmatic link between Podolski's net-rippling feats and the quirks of xkcd comics. Following this, Doe's seminal paper, "Unconventional Correlations: From Quirky to Quantifiable," offers a compelling framework for exploring the whimsical connections that often lurk beneath the surface of data analysis.
Moving beyond the confines of traditional research, a foray into non-fiction literature yields intriguing insights. "The Wikipedia Revolution" by Andrew Lih provides a captivating exploration of the evolution of Wikipedia, laying the groundwork for understanding the cultural impact that xkcd comics may have on the digital landscape. Furthermore, "Soccernomics" by Simon Kuper and Stefan Szymanski invites readers to consider the offbeat connections between economic principles and the beautiful game, offering a refreshing perspective on analyzing unconventional relationships.
Venturing into the realm of fiction, the works of Douglas Adams, particularly "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy," beckon us toward a whimsical exploration of improbable connections and the absurdity of statistical anomalies. Similarly, the offbeat world of Jasper Fforde's "Thursday Next" series sparks the imagination, hinting at the possibility of surreal links between sports and esoteric humor.
In a comedic turn, our literature review strays into the realm of the absurd, drawing inspiration from unexpected sources. The perusal of shampoo bottle labels, while ostensibly unrelated to our research, brought unexpected levity to our investigation and may have inadvertently contributed to our lighthearted approach to uncovering correlations. The tangential yet amusing insights gleaned from these unconventional sources served to further bolster our resolve in embracing playful exploration and seeking amusement in unexpected places.
As we wade through the conventional, the imaginative, and the outright ridiculous, the literature review sets the stage for a vibrant and eclectic exploration of the peculiar entanglement of Podolski's prolific goal-scoring prowess and the zany charm of xkcd comics. With this multifaceted foundation, we embark on our analytical escapade, aiming to uncover correlations as elusive as a cleverly concealed punchline in a dense thicket of data.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our whimsical investigation into the connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and xkcd comics published about Wikipedia have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6745834, an r-squared of 0.4550628, and a p-value of less than 0.01. If you're not familiar with statistical mumbo jumbo, those numbers basically signify a pretty solid relationship between Podolski's goal-scoring prowess and the nerdy, yet hilarious, world of xkcd comics.
To visually capture the sheer hilarity of this improbable connection, we present our scatterplot (Fig. 1) that vividly illustrates the strong correlation between the two variables. It's a graph that manages to evoke both the thrill of a last-minute goal and the whimsical charm of a clever comic strip. Who knew statistics could be so... fun?
While the unexpected link between Podolski's net-rippling exploits and the brainy humor of xkcd might seem as probable as finding a needle in a haystack, our findings add another twist to the wonderful, wacky world of data analysis. This investigation not only brings a smile to the faces of research-worn scholars but also offers a delightful fusion of sports and pop culture, proving that statistical relationships can be as surprising as discovering a unicorn in a data set (or Bigfoot in a forest, whichever you fancy).
In summary, our results provide a lighthearted lens through which to view the curious convergences of diverse subjects, reminding us that even in the serious business of research, there's always room for a good laugh or an unexpected twist.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

In our whimsical investigation, we uncovered a connection between Lukas Podolski's goal-scoring prowess and the nerdy, yet hilarious, world of xkcd comics. This unlikely correlation, while appearing as fantastical as discovering a unicorn in a data set, aligns with previous research on unexpected statistical relationships – though we hope this correlation isn't as elusive as finding Bigfoot in a forest!

Our findings, highlighted by a respectable correlation coefficient of 0.6745834 and a p-value of less than 0.01, serve as an ode to the comical undertones of data analysis. Echoing the amusing insights gleaned from non-fiction literature and even the jestful shampoo bottle labels, our results align with the improbable yet quantifiable relationships emphasized by esteemed researchers like Smith, Doe, and Jones. Their works set the stage for our captivating odyssey into the hilariously improbable realm where Podolski's net-rippling feats intertwine with the clever musings of xkcd comics.

Firmly rooted in the lively spirit of comedy, our findings are a testament to the whimsical explorations of the surreal links between sports and esoteric humor, lending credence to the offbeat connections highlighted in "Soccernomics" by Kuper and Szymanski. Like a well-timed punchline in a comedic routine, our results reinforce the unexpected correlations clandestinely lurking beneath the surface of statistical analyses, substantiating the unconventional yet compelling framework championed by Doe in "Unconventional Correlations: From Quirky to Quantifiable."

Furthermore, our work mirrors the lighthearted lens portrayed in the fiction of Douglas Adams and Jasper Fforde, hinting at the tantalizing prospect of surreal connections between the seemingly unrelated. The mysterious interplay of Podolski's goal-scoring prowess and the zany charm of xkcd comics echoes the absurdist explorations of whimsy in "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" and the "Thursday Next" series, weaving a narrative as captivating as a quixotic tale from a fanciful storyteller.

In summary, our results bring a smile to the faces of research-worn scholars while providing a delightful fusion of sports and pop culture, proving that statistical relationships can be as surprising as a cleverly concealed punchline in a dense thicket of data. After all, who knew that the world of statistics could be as uproariously entertaining as an xkcd comic about Wikipedia?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and xkcd comics published about wikipedia. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Striking Connections: Lukas Podolski's Goal-Scoring Prowess and xkcd Wiki-wonders

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the whimsical intersection of Lukas Podolski's prolific goal-scoring in domestic matches and the enchanting world of xkcd comics dedicated to Wikipedia. Our research delves into the unlikely correlation between the two seemingly unrelated subjects, tapping into the amusing realms of sports and internet humor. Through rigorous statistical analysis and AI scrutiny of xkcd comics, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6745834 and p < 0.01 for the time span of 2007 to 2022. The unexpected link between Podolski's net-rippling exploits and the witticisms depicted in xkcd comics offers a delightful fusion of sports and pop culture, inviting a playful exploration of their interconnectedness. This investigation not only sheds light on the comical undertones of data analysis but also provides a lighthearted lens through which to view the curious convergences of diverse subjects.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction:
In the baffling, yet delightful world of research, unexpected connections often emerge in the most curious of places. It is with this lighthearted sense of intrigue that we embark on an investigation into the whimsical intersection of Lukas Podolski's goal-scoring prowess and the enchanting world of xkcd comics dedicated to Wikipedia. As researchers, we typically find ourselves grappling with weighty matters, delving into complex equations, and grappling with mind-bending statistical analyses. However, the allure of uncovering the connection between a footballer's net-rippling exploits and the witticisms depicted in xkcd comics presents a welcome diversion from the norm – an irresistible opportunity to blend sports and pop culture in a playful exploration of their interconnectedness.
The idea that the prodigious goal-scoring of Lukas Podolski in domestic matches could be in any way linked to the irreverent and often nerdy humor found in xkcd comics may seem at first glance as improbable as finding a statistical outlier in a sea of mundane data points. However, as we have learned from our forays into the realms of science and research, the most peculiar connections can often be the most rewarding to explore. It is in this spirit of scholarly whimsy that we venture forth to shed light on this unexpected combination, offering a refreshing twist in our examination of statistical relationships and uncovering correlations that may seem as surprising as encountering a unicorn in a data set.
Embracing the challenge of unearthing hilarity within our statistical analyses, we have sought to apply rigorous methods to ascertain the degree of correlation between Podolski's dynamic goal-scoring and the amusing illustrations of xkcd comics. Our investigation has involved an array of statistical tools, AI scrutiny of xkcd comics, and a liberal sprinkling of puns and jokes to keep our spirits light amidst the serious business of research. The aim is not only to uncover the unlikely connection but also to showcase the comical undertones of data analysis, offering a fresh perspective on the intertwining of seemingly disparate subjects. As we embark on this jocular journey, we invite our readers to join us in uncovering the delightfully unexpected correlations and connections that can be found in the most serendipitous of places.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our whimsical investigation into the connection between Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count and xkcd comics published about Wikipedia have unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.6745834, an r-squared of 0.4550628, and a p-value of less than 0.01. If you're not familiar with statistical mumbo jumbo, those numbers basically signify a pretty solid relationship between Podolski's goal-scoring prowess and the nerdy, yet hilarious, world of xkcd comics.
To visually capture the sheer hilarity of this improbable connection, we present our scatterplot (Fig. 1) that vividly illustrates the strong correlation between the two variables. It's a graph that manages to evoke both the thrill of a last-minute goal and the whimsical charm of a clever comic strip. Who knew statistics could be so... fun?
While the unexpected link between Podolski's net-rippling exploits and the brainy humor of xkcd might seem as probable as finding a needle in a haystack, our findings add another twist to the wonderful, wacky world of data analysis. This investigation not only brings a smile to the faces of research-worn scholars but also offers a delightful fusion of sports and pop culture, proving that statistical relationships can be as surprising as discovering a unicorn in a data set (or Bigfoot in a forest, whichever you fancy).
In summary, our results provide a lighthearted lens through which to view the curious convergences of diverse subjects, reminding us that even in the serious business of research, there's always room for a good laugh or an unexpected twist.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our whimsical journey through the realm of statistical tomfoolery has left us both enlightened and entertained. Our findings not only underscore the unexpected correlation between Lukas Podolski's goal-scoring prowess in domestic matches and the nerdy, yet delightful, world of xkcd comics dedicated to Wikipedia but also highlight the sheer joy of discovering statistical relationships that are as improbable as a penguin trying to master quantum physics (trust us, we've crunched the numbers). Our journey has been akin to stumbling upon a treasure trove of witty quips in a desert of dry data, reminding us that even in the world of research, there's room for a good laugh or a well-placed pun – much like finding a diamond amidst a pile of statistical coal.

As we reflect on our findings, we can't help but marvel at the serendipitous intersections that await those willing to explore the whimsical terrain of correlation coefficients and scatterplots. Our scatterplot (Fig. 1) not only showcases the robust relationship between Podolski's net-rippling exploits and the cerebral humor of xkcd comics but also manages to capture the sheer absurdity of this connection in a way that's as delightful as a clown at a statistics seminar.

With our results in hand – and a good dose of humor in our hearts – we confidently assert that no further research in this area is needed. After all, when statistical analysis brings together the world of sports and internet humor with such unexpected flair, it's akin to witnessing a supernova in the sky – a rare and wondrous sight that needs no further probing. Now, if you'll excuse us, we'll be donning our lab coats and diving into the next statistical adventure, armed with the knowledge that even in the serious pursuit of research, there's always room for a well-timed chuckle and an unexpected twist.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Striking Connections: Lukas Podolski's Goal-Scoring Prowess and xkcd Wiki-wonders. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sports Analytics and Internet Culture


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Striking Connections: Lukas Podolski's Goal-Scoring Prowess and xkcd Wiki-wonders. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Consortium for Eclectic Sports and Pop Culture Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Striking Connections: Lukas Podolski's Goal-Scoring Prowess and xkcd Wiki-wonders with an abstract of In this study, we investigate the whimsical intersection of Lukas Podolski's prolific goal-scoring in domestic matches and the enchanting world of xkcd comics dedicated to Wikipedia. Our research delves into the unlikely correlation between the two seemingly unrelated subjects, tapping into the amusing realms of sports and internet humor. Through rigorous statistical analysis and AI scrutiny of xkcd comics, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.6745834 and p < 0.01 for the time span of 2007 to 2022. The unexpected link between Podolski's net-rippling exploits and the witticisms depicted in xkcd comics offers a delightful fusion of sports and pop culture, inviting a playful exploration of their interconnectedness. This investigation not only sheds light on the comical undertones of data analysis but also provides a lighthearted lens through which to view the curious convergences of diverse subjects.

ChatGPT:

Lukas Podolski, goal-scoring prowess, xkcd comics, Wikipedia, correlation coefficient, statistical analysis, AI scrutiny, sports, internet humor, data analysis, pop culture, interconnectedness, convergence, diverse subjects

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count

xkcd comics published about wikipedia
Detailed data title: The number of xkcd comics published each year about wikipedia
Source: AI analysis of xkcd comics
Additional Info: I designed a Python workflow to perform OCR on every xkcd comic, feed that text into a large language model, and ask the model whether this comic was about the category named in the title.

See what else correlates with xkcd comics published about wikipedia

Correlation r = 0.6745834 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4550628 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 45.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., xkcd comics published about wikipedia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count) over the 16 years from 2007 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0042. 0.0041511608249210780000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.67 in 0.42% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 241 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.27, 0.88 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count (Goals scored)71093141816124172275259
xkcd comics published about wikipedia (xkcd comics)111016815171791119171513131115




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7,10,9,3,14,18,16,12,4,17,22,7,5,2,5,9,])
array_2 = np.array([11,10,16,8,15,17,17,9,11,19,17,15,13,13,11,15,])
array_1_name = "Lukas Podolski's domestic match goal count"
array_2_name = "xkcd comics published about wikipedia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 3286 · Black Variable ID: 334 · Red Variable ID: 20010
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0