about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,264 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn and the second variable is Hydopower energy generated in Nicaragua.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As GMO corn production soared, it created a 'kernel' of potential energy issues. The 'stalk' of the problem stemmed from the corn's heightened productivity, leading to an 'ear-resistible' surplus. This 'maize' of power production overwhelmed traditional methods, showing that when it comes to energy, GMO corn doesn't 'cob' around!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: The prompt's suggested style is a comic-book-style illustration from the 1960s with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern. Here's an updated prompt to enhance the visuals: Title: "The Cycle of Renewal" Description: In a vast cornfield under the midday sun, rows of genetically modified corn extend to the horizon. The vibrant green of the corn contrasts against the golden soil and deep blue sky. A conveyor belt snakes through the field, transporting the harvested corn to a nearby processing facility. The conveyor belt is depicted with mechanical details and retro designs, reminiscent of the 1960s. At the processing facility, workers clad in vintage overalls and caps oversee the transformation of corn into various consumer products. The scene is filled with machinery and activity, with the muted colors evoking a nostalgic atmosphere. The dotted halftone pattern adds an abstract touch to the industrial setting, giving it a vintage comic book feel. In the background, workers gather the discarded cornhusks and load them onto trucks. The trucks, portrayed with a classic design, depart for Nicaragua, their journey hinted at through a stylized map in the distance. In Nicaragua, the trucks arrive amidst picturesque landscapes. The cornhusks are unloaded and used as a renewable energy source for hydroelectric plants. The rushing water from the plants is represented with dynamic lines and patterns, emphasizing the generation of hydropower energy. Resonating with the vintage style, the visual depiction captures the sense of renewal and progress as the electricity powers nearby communities. The overall scene is rich in detail, capturing the interconnectedness of industrial processes and environmental sustainability, all within the distinctive aesthetic of a 1960s comic-book-style illustration. No words or speech bubbles are included, allowing the visuals to tell the story. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn and Hydopower energy generated in Nicaragua. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Parallax art Celtic art Sci-fi fantacy a Polaroid photo A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s
ChatGPT: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn and Hydopower energy generated in Nicaragua, in the following situation: As GMO corn production increased, it also led to an increase in cornhusk waste, which was then used as a renewable energy source to power hydroelectric plants in Nicaragua, effectively boosting hydropower energy generation.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast cornfield, rows of genetically modified corn stretch out as far as the eye can see. A conveyor belt transports the harvested corn to a processing facility, where the corn is turned into consumer products. Meanwhile, workers gather the cornhusks and load them into trucks. These trucks travel to Nicaragua, where the cornhusks are used as a renewable energy source to power hydroelectric plants. The rushing water from the plants generates a significant amount of hydropower energy, providing electricity to nearby communities.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s ] and depicting this scene: In a vast cornfield, rows of genetically modified corn stretch out as far as the eye can see. A conveyor belt transports the harvested corn to a processing facility, where the corn is turned into consumer products. Meanwhile, workers gather the cornhusks and load them into trucks. These trucks travel to Nicaragua, where the cornhusks are used as a renewable energy source to power hydroelectric plants. The rushing water from the plants generates a significant amount of hydropower energy, providing electricity to nearby communities. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: The prompt's suggested style is a comic-book-style illustration from the 1960s with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern. Here's an updated prompt to enhance the visuals: Title: "The Cycle of Renewal" Description: In a vast cornfield under the midday sun, rows of genetically modified corn extend to the horizon. The vibrant green of the corn contrasts against the golden soil and deep blue sky. A conveyor belt snakes through the field, transporting the harvested corn to a nearby processing facility. The conveyor belt is depicted with mechanical details and retro designs, reminiscent of the 1960s. At the processing facility, workers clad in vintage overalls and caps oversee the transformation of corn into various consumer products. The scene is filled with machinery and activity, with the muted colors evoking a nostalgic atmosphere. The dotted halftone pattern adds an abstract touch to the industrial setting, giving it a vintage comic book feel. In the background, workers gather the discarded cornhusks and load them onto trucks. The trucks, portrayed with a classic design, depart for Nicaragua, their journey hinted at through a stylized map in the distance. In Nicaragua, the trucks arrive amidst picturesque landscapes. The cornhusks are unloaded and used as a renewable energy source for hydroelectric plants. The rushing water from the plants is represented with dynamic lines and patterns, emphasizing the generation of hydropower energy. Resonating with the vintage style, the visual depiction captures the sense of renewal and progress as the electricity powers nearby communities. The overall scene is rich in detail, capturing the interconnectedness of industrial processes and environmental sustainability, all within the distinctive aesthetic of a 1960s comic-book-style illustration. No words or speech bubbles are included, allowing the visuals to tell the story.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn caused Hydopower energy generated in Nicaragua to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Kernels of Truth: Corny Connections Between GMO Use in Corn and Hydro-power in Nicaragua

Journal of Agricultural Innovations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Hydopower energy generated in Nicaragua. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6047870 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Kernels of Truth: Corny Connections Between GMO Use in Corn and Hydro-power in Nicaragua"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper presents a statistically significant analysis of the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the generation of hydroelectric power in Nicaragua. Through the utilization of data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this husk-y subject to uncover how these seemingly unrelated fields may be interconnected. Our findings revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.6047870 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2000 to 2021.

We un-kernel-ed a fascinating association that suggests that the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation may have a direct impact on the generation of hydro-power in Nicaragua. This corn-founding evidence merits further exploration and discussion. Furthermore, our results indicate a-corn-ucopia of possibilities for leveraging agricultural practices to advance sustainable energy production.

In conclusion, the findings of this study shed light on the kernel of truth regarding the cross-pollination of agricultural and energy sectors. This research not only provides empirical support for the intersection of GMO use in corn and hydro-power generation but also highlights potential avenues for future research in this burgeoning field. As we crack open this corn field, we invite other researchers to seize the cornucopia of research opportunities presented by this novel connection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Hydopower energy generated in Nicaragua. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Kernels of Truth: Corny Connections Between GMO Use in Corn and Hydro-power in Nicaragua"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper presents a statistically significant analysis of the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the generation of hydroelectric power in Nicaragua. Through the utilization of data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this husk-y subject to uncover how these seemingly unrelated fields may be interconnected. Our findings revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.6047870 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2000 to 2021.

We un-kernel-ed a fascinating association that suggests that the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation may have a direct impact on the generation of hydro-power in Nicaragua. This corn-founding evidence merits further exploration and discussion. Furthermore, our results indicate a-corn-ucopia of possibilities for leveraging agricultural practices to advance sustainable energy production.

In conclusion, the findings of this study shed light on the kernel of truth regarding the cross-pollination of agricultural and energy sectors. This research not only provides empirical support for the intersection of GMO use in corn and hydro-power generation but also highlights potential avenues for future research in this burgeoning field. As we crack open this corn field, we invite other researchers to seize the cornucopia of research opportunities presented by this novel connection.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

There's a certain husk about the relationship between GMO use in corn and the generation of hydro-power in Nicaragua that has kept researchers ears perking up – it's a-maize-ing, really. This unlikely pairing of agriculture and energy production has been the fodder of curiosity amongst scientists and policymakers alike. But does the use of GMOs in corn fields really have the potential to power up hydroelectric plants? To answer this cornundrum, we set out to conduct a maize-ingly comprehensive statistical analysis that "ears" new insights into this intriguing correlation.

As we delve into this bushel of research, it's important to appreciate the pun-derlying implications of our study. The stakes are high, the water's flowing, and the corn – well – it's popping! But beneath this kernel of humor lies a serious endeavor to uncover the empirical link between two seemingly distinct domains – the cultivation of genetically modified corn and the generation of hydro-power.

Now, let's not "cob"ble together some half-baked assumptions; this investigation is rooted in empirical data and rigorous statistical analysis. The magnitude of our findings may just "stalk" your thoughts and "leaf" you in disbelief!

We hope to provide a-maize-ing clarity on this corn-nection, and in doing so, shed light on the potential implications for agricultural and energy policies. So, without further ado, let's dive into the cobweb of corn and current and see what kernels of truth we can unearth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Hydopower energy generated in Nicaragua. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Kernels of Truth: Corny Connections Between GMO Use in Corn and Hydro-power in Nicaragua"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper presents a statistically significant analysis of the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the generation of hydroelectric power in Nicaragua. Through the utilization of data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this husk-y subject to uncover how these seemingly unrelated fields may be interconnected. Our findings revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.6047870 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2000 to 2021.

We un-kernel-ed a fascinating association that suggests that the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation may have a direct impact on the generation of hydro-power in Nicaragua. This corn-founding evidence merits further exploration and discussion. Furthermore, our results indicate a-corn-ucopia of possibilities for leveraging agricultural practices to advance sustainable energy production.

In conclusion, the findings of this study shed light on the kernel of truth regarding the cross-pollination of agricultural and energy sectors. This research not only provides empirical support for the intersection of GMO use in corn and hydro-power generation but also highlights potential avenues for future research in this burgeoning field. As we crack open this corn field, we invite other researchers to seize the cornucopia of research opportunities presented by this novel connection.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
There's a certain husk about the relationship between GMO use in corn and the generation of hydro-power in Nicaragua that has kept researchers ears perking up – it's a-maize-ing, really. This unlikely pairing of agriculture and energy production has been the fodder of curiosity amongst scientists and policymakers alike. But does the use of GMOs in corn fields really have the potential to power up hydroelectric plants? To answer this cornundrum, we set out to conduct a maize-ingly comprehensive statistical analysis that "ears" new insights into this intriguing correlation.
As we delve into this bushel of research, it's important to appreciate the pun-derlying implications of our study. The stakes are high, the water's flowing, and the corn – well – it's popping! But beneath this kernel of humor lies a serious endeavor to uncover the empirical link between two seemingly distinct domains – the cultivation of genetically modified corn and the generation of hydro-power.
Now, let's not "cob"ble together some half-baked assumptions; this investigation is rooted in empirical data and rigorous statistical analysis. The magnitude of our findings may just "stalk" your thoughts and "leaf" you in disbelief!
We hope to provide a-maize-ing clarity on this corn-nection, and in doing so, shed light on the potential implications for agricultural and energy policies. So, without further ado, let's dive into the cobweb of corn and current and see what kernels of truth we can unearth.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, Smith et al. (2015) unearth the profound influence of GMO use in corn production on agricultural yields. Their study showcases the substantial advancements in crop resilience and productivity achieved through the adoption of genetically modified varieties. However, what this author and his colleagues failed to mention is the potential for these modified cornfields to power up the local hydroelectric plants. Perhaps they simply didn't want to "stalk" about it!

Doe and Jones (2018) delve into the energy landscape in Nicaragua, illuminating the significant strides in hydro-power generation over the past decade. Their rigorous examination of energy data provides crucial insights into the burgeoning development of sustainable energy sources. But what they may have overlooked is the hidden potential of GMO corn to add some "kernels" of power to their energy grid.

With a foundation laid by these insightful studies, it's time to incorporate findings from a broader range of literature. "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan offers a flavorful exploration of the complexities of modern food production, including the role of GMOs in shaping agricultural practices. However, Pollan regrettably fails to mention the electrifying impact that GMO corn might have on hydro-power generation. Clearly, this dilemma needed a lightbulb moment!

Moving to the realm of fiction, "The Corn Whisperer" by Stephen King captures the imagination with its eerie tale of a haunted cornfield. While this narrative may be more suited for Halloween than a scholarly review, it does bring to mind the mysterious forces that could be at play in the corn-energy nexus. Maybe Stephen King can shed some light on the "stalk"-er lurking in the hydroelectric dams!

Lastly, the animated series "Corn & Friends" might seem like an unlikely source of information, but its depiction of anthropomorphic corn characters navigating the challenges of agricultural life offers a surprisingly accurate portrayal of the GMO corn cultivation process. Who knew that a children's cartoon could provide such insight into the behind-the-scenes workings of the corn industry? It's a-maize-ing, really!

As we gather insights from diverse sources, it becomes evident that the intersection of GMO use in corn and hydro-power generation is a field ripe for further exploration. The kernels of truth embedded in these disparate works beckon us to embrace the "ear"-resistible potential of this unexplored connection.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Hydopower energy generated in Nicaragua. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2000 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Kernels of Truth: Corny Connections Between GMO Use in Corn and Hydro-power in Nicaragua"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper presents a statistically significant analysis of the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the generation of hydroelectric power in Nicaragua. Through the utilization of data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this husk-y subject to uncover how these seemingly unrelated fields may be interconnected. Our findings revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.6047870 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2000 to 2021.

We un-kernel-ed a fascinating association that suggests that the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation may have a direct impact on the generation of hydro-power in Nicaragua. This corn-founding evidence merits further exploration and discussion. Furthermore, our results indicate a-corn-ucopia of possibilities for leveraging agricultural practices to advance sustainable energy production.

In conclusion, the findings of this study shed light on the kernel of truth regarding the cross-pollination of agricultural and energy sectors. This research not only provides empirical support for the intersection of GMO use in corn and hydro-power generation but also highlights potential avenues for future research in this burgeoning field. As we crack open this corn field, we invite other researchers to seize the cornucopia of research opportunities presented by this novel connection.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
There's a certain husk about the relationship between GMO use in corn and the generation of hydro-power in Nicaragua that has kept researchers ears perking up – it's a-maize-ing, really. This unlikely pairing of agriculture and energy production has been the fodder of curiosity amongst scientists and policymakers alike. But does the use of GMOs in corn fields really have the potential to power up hydroelectric plants? To answer this cornundrum, we set out to conduct a maize-ingly comprehensive statistical analysis that "ears" new insights into this intriguing correlation.
As we delve into this bushel of research, it's important to appreciate the pun-derlying implications of our study. The stakes are high, the water's flowing, and the corn – well – it's popping! But beneath this kernel of humor lies a serious endeavor to uncover the empirical link between two seemingly distinct domains – the cultivation of genetically modified corn and the generation of hydro-power.
Now, let's not "cob"ble together some half-baked assumptions; this investigation is rooted in empirical data and rigorous statistical analysis. The magnitude of our findings may just "stalk" your thoughts and "leaf" you in disbelief!
We hope to provide a-maize-ing clarity on this corn-nection, and in doing so, shed light on the potential implications for agricultural and energy policies. So, without further ado, let's dive into the cobweb of corn and current and see what kernels of truth we can unearth.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To peel back the layers of this enigmatic correlation between GMO use in corn and the generation of hydro-power in Nicaragua, we employed a robust methodology that doesn't corn-er any excuses. Our research team diligently gathered data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, ensuring that our data harvest was as rich as a golden cornfield swaying in the breeze.

To conduct this stu-dious pursuit, we utilized a time-series analysis to examine the relationship between the adoption of GMOs in corn production and the hydroelectric power generated in Nicaragua. We "field-tested" various statistical models, including regression analysis and correlation coefficients, to tease out the corn-nection between these seemingly disparate variables.

In addition, we employed a multi-step approach to sift through the mountain of data and husk out any confounding variables that might obscure the a-maize-ing relationship we sought to unearth. We didn't just cobble together the data – we shucked it thoroughly to ensure that our findings were as crisp as a fresh ear of corn on a summer day.

Furthermore, we applied advanced econometric techniques to control for external factors and environmental conditions that could husk the statistical validity of our analysis. Our approach wasn't just corn conventional – it was cutting-edge, leveraging the latest statistical methods to stomp out any potential kernel of doubt in our investigation.

With a-maize-ing care and precision, we examined the data spanning from 2000 to 2021, ensuring that our analysis captured the evolution of both GMO adoption in corn cultivation and the hydro-power generation landscape. Our time-spanning approach allowed us to capture the full kernel of the relationship between these variables, unveiling a stalk-tacular pattern that may just leave you corn-pletely astounded.

In summary, our methodology embraced the puzzling yet promising nature of this corn-undrum, employing statistical rigor and a-maize-ing attention to detail to husk out the truth from the labyrinth of data. We didn't cob out corners or kernel any details – we embraced the challenge with ear-resistible enthusiasm and a commitment to corn-mendable scientific inquiry. So sit back, butter up your popcorn, and prepare to be corn-vinced by the statistical prowess of our methodology.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Hydopower energy generated in Nicaragua. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2000 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.6047870, r-squared of 0.3657673, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Kernels of Truth: Corny Connections Between GMO Use in Corn and Hydro-power in Nicaragua"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper presents a statistically significant analysis of the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the generation of hydroelectric power in Nicaragua. Through the utilization of data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this husk-y subject to uncover how these seemingly unrelated fields may be interconnected. Our findings revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.6047870 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2000 to 2021.

We un-kernel-ed a fascinating association that suggests that the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation may have a direct impact on the generation of hydro-power in Nicaragua. This corn-founding evidence merits further exploration and discussion. Furthermore, our results indicate a-corn-ucopia of possibilities for leveraging agricultural practices to advance sustainable energy production.

In conclusion, the findings of this study shed light on the kernel of truth regarding the cross-pollination of agricultural and energy sectors. This research not only provides empirical support for the intersection of GMO use in corn and hydro-power generation but also highlights potential avenues for future research in this burgeoning field. As we crack open this corn field, we invite other researchers to seize the cornucopia of research opportunities presented by this novel connection.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
There's a certain husk about the relationship between GMO use in corn and the generation of hydro-power in Nicaragua that has kept researchers ears perking up – it's a-maize-ing, really. This unlikely pairing of agriculture and energy production has been the fodder of curiosity amongst scientists and policymakers alike. But does the use of GMOs in corn fields really have the potential to power up hydroelectric plants? To answer this cornundrum, we set out to conduct a maize-ingly comprehensive statistical analysis that "ears" new insights into this intriguing correlation.
As we delve into this bushel of research, it's important to appreciate the pun-derlying implications of our study. The stakes are high, the water's flowing, and the corn – well – it's popping! But beneath this kernel of humor lies a serious endeavor to uncover the empirical link between two seemingly distinct domains – the cultivation of genetically modified corn and the generation of hydro-power.
Now, let's not "cob"ble together some half-baked assumptions; this investigation is rooted in empirical data and rigorous statistical analysis. The magnitude of our findings may just "stalk" your thoughts and "leaf" you in disbelief!
We hope to provide a-maize-ing clarity on this corn-nection, and in doing so, shed light on the potential implications for agricultural and energy policies. So, without further ado, let's dive into the cobweb of corn and current and see what kernels of truth we can unearth.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis revealed a notable correlation coefficient (r) of 0.6047870, indicating a moderately strong positive relationship between the use of GMOs in corn production and the generation of hydroelectric power in Nicaragua. This finding suggests that as the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation increased, so did the generation of hydro-power, a-maize-ing, isn't it?

Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was found to be 0.3657673, signifying that approximately 36.6% of the variability in hydro-power generation in Nicaragua can be explained by the use of GMOs in corn production. So, it seems that GMOs may not just be "corny" after all – they hold the potential to "power up" the energy sector.

The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the correlation observed is statistically significant, "kernel-ing" any doubts about the robustness of the relationship between these two variables. It appears that this cornundrum has been crunched, pip, pip, hooray!

As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually illustrates the strong positive correlation between GMO use in corn and hydroelectric power generation in Nicaragua. The data points are as tightly interwoven as a corn cob, leaving little room for doubt about the existence of this intriguing relationship.

In conclusion, these findings not only offer compelling evidence of the association between GMO use in corn and hydro-power generation but also sow the seeds for further exploration in this field. It seems that beyond the corn fields, a-maize-ing developments in sustainable energy may be popping up. This research urges researchers to take a leaf from our book and continue to peel back the husk to reveal the corn-nections that lie within.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Hydopower energy generated in Nicaragua. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Kernels of Truth: Corny Connections Between GMO Use in Corn and Hydro-power in Nicaragua"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper presents a statistically significant analysis of the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the generation of hydroelectric power in Nicaragua. Through the utilization of data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this husk-y subject to uncover how these seemingly unrelated fields may be interconnected. Our findings revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.6047870 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2000 to 2021.

We un-kernel-ed a fascinating association that suggests that the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation may have a direct impact on the generation of hydro-power in Nicaragua. This corn-founding evidence merits further exploration and discussion. Furthermore, our results indicate a-corn-ucopia of possibilities for leveraging agricultural practices to advance sustainable energy production.

In conclusion, the findings of this study shed light on the kernel of truth regarding the cross-pollination of agricultural and energy sectors. This research not only provides empirical support for the intersection of GMO use in corn and hydro-power generation but also highlights potential avenues for future research in this burgeoning field. As we crack open this corn field, we invite other researchers to seize the cornucopia of research opportunities presented by this novel connection.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, Smith et al. (2015) unearth the profound influence of GMO use in corn production on agricultural yields. Their study showcases the substantial advancements in crop resilience and productivity achieved through the adoption of genetically modified varieties. However, what this author and his colleagues failed to mention is the potential for these modified cornfields to power up the local hydroelectric plants. Perhaps they simply didn't want to "stalk" about it!
Doe and Jones (2018) delve into the energy landscape in Nicaragua, illuminating the significant strides in hydro-power generation over the past decade. Their rigorous examination of energy data provides crucial insights into the burgeoning development of sustainable energy sources. But what they may have overlooked is the hidden potential of GMO corn to add some "kernels" of power to their energy grid.
With a foundation laid by these insightful studies, it's time to incorporate findings from a broader range of literature. "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan offers a flavorful exploration of the complexities of modern food production, including the role of GMOs in shaping agricultural practices. However, Pollan regrettably fails to mention the electrifying impact that GMO corn might have on hydro-power generation. Clearly, this dilemma needed a lightbulb moment!
Moving to the realm of fiction, "The Corn Whisperer" by Stephen King captures the imagination with its eerie tale of a haunted cornfield. While this narrative may be more suited for Halloween than a scholarly review, it does bring to mind the mysterious forces that could be at play in the corn-energy nexus. Maybe Stephen King can shed some light on the "stalk"-er lurking in the hydroelectric dams!
Lastly, the animated series "Corn & Friends" might seem like an unlikely source of information, but its depiction of anthropomorphic corn characters navigating the challenges of agricultural life offers a surprisingly accurate portrayal of the GMO corn cultivation process. Who knew that a children's cartoon could provide such insight into the behind-the-scenes workings of the corn industry? It's a-maize-ing, really!
As we gather insights from diverse sources, it becomes evident that the intersection of GMO use in corn and hydro-power generation is a field ripe for further exploration. The kernels of truth embedded in these disparate works beckon us to embrace the "ear"-resistible potential of this unexplored connection.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a notable correlation coefficient (r) of 0.6047870, indicating a moderately strong positive relationship between the use of GMOs in corn production and the generation of hydroelectric power in Nicaragua. This finding suggests that as the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation increased, so did the generation of hydro-power, a-maize-ing, isn't it?
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was found to be 0.3657673, signifying that approximately 36.6% of the variability in hydro-power generation in Nicaragua can be explained by the use of GMOs in corn production. So, it seems that GMOs may not just be "corny" after all – they hold the potential to "power up" the energy sector.
The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the correlation observed is statistically significant, "kernel-ing" any doubts about the robustness of the relationship between these two variables. It appears that this cornundrum has been crunched, pip, pip, hooray!
As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually illustrates the strong positive correlation between GMO use in corn and hydroelectric power generation in Nicaragua. The data points are as tightly interwoven as a corn cob, leaving little room for doubt about the existence of this intriguing relationship.
In conclusion, these findings not only offer compelling evidence of the association between GMO use in corn and hydro-power generation but also sow the seeds for further exploration in this field. It seems that beyond the corn fields, a-maize-ing developments in sustainable energy may be popping up. This research urges researchers to take a leaf from our book and continue to peel back the husk to reveal the corn-nections that lie within.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study have unveiled a striking connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the generation of hydroelectric power in Nicaragua. It is clear that the positive correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value provide strong support for the premise that the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation is associated with increased hydro-power generation in Nicaragua. It’s like these two variables are in a-“maize”-ing harmony, working together like a pair of perfectly matched nucleotides!

Building upon the “kernel” of truth from prior research, our findings align with the work of Smith et al. (2015), who highlighted the significant advancements in crop productivity and resilience due to GMO use in corn. However, what was previously overlooked is the potential for this modified corn cultivation to have a direct impact on the generation of hydroelectric power. It’s as if the corn fields were whispering their secrets of power generation all along – maybe it’s time to listen!

Additionally, the results of our investigation resonate with the study by Doe and Jones (2018) in showcasing the substantial strides in hydro-power generation in Nicaragua. While they provided invaluable insights into sustainable energy sources, the unexpected connection to GMO corn as a potential contributor to hydro-power generation was a-corn-veniently left unexplored. It seems that this overlooked relationship has been biding its time, waiting to be plucked from obscurity like a hidden cob of corn!

The coefficient of determination reveals that approximately 36.6% of the variability in hydro-power generation in Nicaragua can be attributed to the use of GMOs in corn production. This suggests that GMOs may not just be “corny” after all – they hold the potential to nourish the energy sector with their hidden power. It’s a-maize-ing to think of these genetically modified cornfields as little power plants, silently contributing to the energy landscape of Nicaragua.

The statistically significant p-value “kernel-ing” any doubts about the robustness of the relationship between GMO use in corn and hydro-power generation puts the corn-cerns to rest. The data points in the scatterplot are as tightly interwoven as a cob of corn, illustrating the undeniable correlation between these variables. It’s as if the corn and hydro-power are engaged in a coordinated dance, producing power in perfect harmony – or should we say, corndination?

In essence, the findings of this study not only contribute to the burgeoning field of sustainable energy but also open the door to a-maize-ing possibilities for leveraging agricultural practices to advance energy production. The “stalk” of GMO corn reaches beyond the fields and into the realm of sustainable energy, intertwining with hydro-power generation in Nicaragua. The corn-nections unveiled through this research sow the seeds for future exploration of this fertile intersection. It’s time for researchers to grab the popcorn and settle in for a new era of “a-maize-ing” discoveries!




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Hydopower energy generated in Nicaragua. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Kernels of Truth: Corny Connections Between GMO Use in Corn and Hydro-power in Nicaragua"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This research paper presents a statistically significant analysis of the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the generation of hydroelectric power in Nicaragua. Through the utilization of data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this husk-y subject to uncover how these seemingly unrelated fields may be interconnected. Our findings revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.6047870 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2000 to 2021.

We un-kernel-ed a fascinating association that suggests that the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation may have a direct impact on the generation of hydro-power in Nicaragua. This corn-founding evidence merits further exploration and discussion. Furthermore, our results indicate a-corn-ucopia of possibilities for leveraging agricultural practices to advance sustainable energy production.

In conclusion, the findings of this study shed light on the kernel of truth regarding the cross-pollination of agricultural and energy sectors. This research not only provides empirical support for the intersection of GMO use in corn and hydro-power generation but also highlights potential avenues for future research in this burgeoning field. As we crack open this corn field, we invite other researchers to seize the cornucopia of research opportunities presented by this novel connection.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
There's a certain husk about the relationship between GMO use in corn and the generation of hydro-power in Nicaragua that has kept researchers ears perking up – it's a-maize-ing, really. This unlikely pairing of agriculture and energy production has been the fodder of curiosity amongst scientists and policymakers alike. But does the use of GMOs in corn fields really have the potential to power up hydroelectric plants? To answer this cornundrum, we set out to conduct a maize-ingly comprehensive statistical analysis that "ears" new insights into this intriguing correlation.
As we delve into this bushel of research, it's important to appreciate the pun-derlying implications of our study. The stakes are high, the water's flowing, and the corn – well – it's popping! But beneath this kernel of humor lies a serious endeavor to uncover the empirical link between two seemingly distinct domains – the cultivation of genetically modified corn and the generation of hydro-power.
Now, let's not "cob"ble together some half-baked assumptions; this investigation is rooted in empirical data and rigorous statistical analysis. The magnitude of our findings may just "stalk" your thoughts and "leaf" you in disbelief!
We hope to provide a-maize-ing clarity on this corn-nection, and in doing so, shed light on the potential implications for agricultural and energy policies. So, without further ado, let's dive into the cobweb of corn and current and see what kernels of truth we can unearth.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis revealed a notable correlation coefficient (r) of 0.6047870, indicating a moderately strong positive relationship between the use of GMOs in corn production and the generation of hydroelectric power in Nicaragua. This finding suggests that as the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation increased, so did the generation of hydro-power, a-maize-ing, isn't it?
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was found to be 0.3657673, signifying that approximately 36.6% of the variability in hydro-power generation in Nicaragua can be explained by the use of GMOs in corn production. So, it seems that GMOs may not just be "corny" after all – they hold the potential to "power up" the energy sector.
The p-value of less than 0.01 indicates that the correlation observed is statistically significant, "kernel-ing" any doubts about the robustness of the relationship between these two variables. It appears that this cornundrum has been crunched, pip, pip, hooray!
As depicted in Figure 1, the scatterplot visually illustrates the strong positive correlation between GMO use in corn and hydroelectric power generation in Nicaragua. The data points are as tightly interwoven as a corn cob, leaving little room for doubt about the existence of this intriguing relationship.
In conclusion, these findings not only offer compelling evidence of the association between GMO use in corn and hydro-power generation but also sow the seeds for further exploration in this field. It seems that beyond the corn fields, a-maize-ing developments in sustainable energy may be popping up. This research urges researchers to take a leaf from our book and continue to peel back the husk to reveal the corn-nections that lie within.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has uncovered a kernel of truth, a-maize-ing in its implications, that sheds light on the captivating connection between the use of GMOs in corn production and the generation of hydroelectric power in Nicaragua. It seems the a-corn-ucopia of evidence points to a not-so-corny correlation, isn't that cob-founding?

The statistical analysis reaped a harvest of insights, with a correlation coefficient (r) of 0.6047870, indicating a positively electrifying relationship. It's as if the GMOs are the "kernel" to the energy potential, making us wonder if corn really is the "stalk" exchange of sustainable energy.

Moreover, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.3657673 suggests that a-maize-ing 36.6% of the variability in hydro-power generation in Nicaragua can be attributed to the use of GMOs in corn production. It's like these modified corn fields are really "ear-marked" for energy production.

With a p-value of less than 0.01, we can confidently say that the observed correlation is not just a-maize-ing, but statistically significant, giving us a "cornfirmed" measure of the relationship. It's like a-maize-ing success in the agriculture and energy sectors, isn't it?

As we plant the flag of discovery in this field, it seems that no further research is needed to husk out the details of this striking correlation. We've truly popped the corn on this research, and it's time for other researchers to "stalk" new frontiers. There's no need to "cob-sess" over this matter any longer.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Kernels of Truth: Corny Connections Between GMO Use in Corn and Hydro-power in Nicaragua. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Agricultural Innovations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Kernels of Truth: Corny Connections Between GMO Use in Corn and Hydro-power in Nicaragua. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Alliance for Sustainable Agriculture and Renewable Energy


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Kernels of Truth: Corny Connections Between GMO Use in Corn and Hydro-power in Nicaragua with an abstract of This research paper presents a statistically significant analysis of the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the generation of hydroelectric power in Nicaragua. Through the utilization of data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this husk-y subject to uncover how these seemingly unrelated fields may be interconnected. Our findings revealed a notable correlation coefficient of 0.6047870 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning from 2000 to 2021.
We un-kernel-ed a fascinating association that suggests that the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation may have a direct impact on the generation of hydro-power in Nicaragua. This corn-founding evidence merits further exploration and discussion. Furthermore, our results indicate a-corn-ucopia of possibilities for leveraging agricultural practices to advance sustainable energy production.
In conclusion, the findings of this study shed light on the kernel of truth regarding the cross-pollination of agricultural and energy sectors. This research not only provides empirical support for the intersection of GMO use in corn and hydro-power generation but also highlights potential avenues for future research in this burgeoning field. As we crack open this corn field, we invite other researchers to seize the cornucopia of research opportunities presented by this novel connection.

ChatGPT:

GMO, corn production, hydroelectric power, Nicaragua, USDA data, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, sustainable energy production, agricultural practices, empirical support, GMO use, cross-pollination, research opportunities

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in the United States that is genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn

Hydopower energy generated in Nicaragua
Detailed data title: Total hydopower energy generated in Nicaragua in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Hydopower energy generated in Nicaragua

Correlation r = 0.6047870 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.3657673 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 36.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hydopower energy generated in Nicaragua) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn) over the 22 years from 2000 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0029. 0.0028663708076247653000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.6 in 0.29% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 349 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 21 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 21 because we have two variables measured over a period of 22 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.25, 0.82 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
GMO use in corn (GMO corn %)25263440475261738085868888909392929292929293
Hydopower energy generated in Nicaragua (Billion kWh)0.2080.1950.30.2940.3180.4290.3050.3030.529470.2940.4990.440.4150.4510.3910.2920.4220.4630.4108920.2269860.5744710.574471




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([25,26,34,40,47,52,61,73,80,85,86,88,88,90,93,92,92,92,92,92,92,93,])
array_2 = np.array([0.208,0.195,0.3,0.294,0.318,0.429,0.305,0.303,0.52947,0.294,0.499,0.44,0.415,0.451,0.391,0.292,0.422,0.463,0.410892,0.226986,0.574471,0.574471,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn"
array_2_name = "Hydopower energy generated in Nicaragua"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 3264 · Black Variable ID: 766 · Red Variable ID: 23862
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0