Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the number of opticians in Puerto Rico rose, so did the cost to send a letter via USPS. It seems the opticians were really framing the issue, leading to a clearer view of the rising postal prices. Perhaps they were just all about making a spectacle of the situation, or maybe they saw an opportunity to lens a hand in the mailing costs. It's a vision of economic influence that's just too eye-catching to ignore!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Scalar art ] Create an image of a vibrant town square in Puerto Rico, bustling with diverse individuals going about their daily activities. In the foreground, depict a row of small, vibrant booths where opticians are discreetly engaging with customers, fitting them for glasses. Meanwhile, a long line of people waits outside the local post office, with the increased postage price visibly causing murmurs among the crowd. In the midst of the commotion, subtly illustrate the opticians slyly slipping weightless eyeglass prescriptions into mail slots, causing the postal service's prices to soar without any tangible explanation. The scene should capture the energy and intrigue of the moment, with subtle clues of the opticians' actions causing the unexpected rise in postal prices. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of opticians in Puerto Rico and Cost to send a letter via the USPS. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Steampunk Scalar art Cybernetic art Cubism Data cyber art
ChatGPT: Scalar art
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of opticians in Puerto Rico and Cost to send a letter via the USPS, in the following situation: The increase in opticians in Puerto Rico caused the cost to send a letter via USPS to increase because the opticians were secretly sending small, weightless eyeglass prescriptions through the mail, causing the postal service to raise prices to cover the invisible but very real burden.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a crowded town square in Puerto Rico, opticians set up small booths to tend to the bustling crowd. A line of people forms outside the local post office where the cost to send a letter via USPS has just increased. As curious onlookers watch, the opticians are seen discreetly slipping weightless eyeglass prescriptions into the mail slots, causing the postal service to raise prices to cover the invisible but very real burden.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Scalar art ] and depicting this scene: In a crowded town square in Puerto Rico, opticians set up small booths to tend to the bustling crowd. A line of people forms outside the local post office where the cost to send a letter via USPS has just increased. As curious onlookers watch, the opticians are seen discreetly slipping weightless eyeglass prescriptions into the mail slots, causing the postal service to raise prices to cover the invisible but very real burden. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Scalar art ] Create an image of a vibrant town square in Puerto Rico, bustling with diverse individuals going about their daily activities. In the foreground, depict a row of small, vibrant booths where opticians are discreetly engaging with customers, fitting them for glasses. Meanwhile, a long line of people waits outside the local post office, with the increased postage price visibly causing murmurs among the crowd. In the midst of the commotion, subtly illustrate the opticians slyly slipping weightless eyeglass prescriptions into mail slots, causing the postal service's prices to soar without any tangible explanation. The scene should capture the energy and intrigue of the moment, with subtle clues of the opticians' actions causing the unexpected rise in postal prices.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of opticians in Puerto Rico caused Cost to send a letter via the USPS to increase. Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
Visual Visionaries: The Vexing Venture of Vision and Postage in Puerto Rico The Journal of Opticopia Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of opticians in Puerto Rico and Cost to send a letter via the USPS. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title an alliteration.
Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and US Postal Service to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8607016 and p < 0.01 for 2006 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Visual Visionaries: The Vexing Venture of Vision and Postage in Puerto Rico
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the curious correlation between the number of opticians in Puerto Rico and the cost to send a letter via the USPS. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Postal Service for the years 2006 to 2022, our research team identified a correlation coefficient of 0.8607016 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest an intriguing association between visual care professionals and postal fees, prompting us to ponder whether the sharpness of one's vision may indeed affect the weight of one's mail. This unexpected connection invites further investigation into the optical implications on postage pricing, adding a new dimension to the age-old adage, "Seeing is believing."
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of opticians in Puerto Rico and Cost to send a letter via the USPS. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Visual Visionaries: The Vexing Venture of Vision and Postage in Puerto Rico
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the curious correlation between the number of opticians in Puerto Rico and the cost to send a letter via the USPS. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Postal Service for the years 2006 to 2022, our research team identified a correlation coefficient of 0.8607016 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest an intriguing association between visual care professionals and postal fees, prompting us to ponder whether the sharpness of one's vision may indeed affect the weight of one's mail. This unexpected connection invites further investigation into the optical implications on postage pricing, adding a new dimension to the age-old adage, "Seeing is believing."
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The eye-catching relationship between the number of opticians in Puerto Rico and the cost to send a letter via the USPS has sparked intellectual curiosity and raised eyebrows within the research community. While the connection between visual care and postage pricing may not be immediately apparent, our investigation seeks to shed light on this intriguing association. As we delve into the depths of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Postal Service, it is evident that there is more to this correlation than meets the eye. Our aim is to provide a clear-sighted analysis of this curious phenomenon and unravel the tangled web of optical implications on postal fees.
The realms of optometry and postage might seem like disparate domains, but the statistical evidence we have unearthed hints at a potentially eye-opening relationship. The correlation coefficient of 0.8607016 that emerged from our meticulous analysis piques our interest and beckons us to take a closer look. It is a number that commands attention, much like a striking spectacle that captures one's gaze. Furthermore, the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 serves as a beacon, guiding our quest for understanding amidst the murky waters of correlation and causation.
As we embark on this scholarly voyage, we are not short-sighted in recognizing the novelty and peculiarity of this investigation. The tantalizing prospect of visual acuity influencing the weight of mail adds a new twist to the conventional wisdom of postal pricing. It provokes contemplation and invites whimsical musings about the eyes as unwitting accomplices in determining the cost of correspondence. Therefore, we invite readers to join us in this intellectual foray as we unravel the mysteries of Visual Visionaries: The Vexing Venture of Vision and Postage in Puerto Rico.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of opticians in Puerto Rico and Cost to send a letter via the USPS. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Visual Visionaries: The Vexing Venture of Vision and Postage in Puerto Rico
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the curious correlation between the number of opticians in Puerto Rico and the cost to send a letter via the USPS. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Postal Service for the years 2006 to 2022, our research team identified a correlation coefficient of 0.8607016 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest an intriguing association between visual care professionals and postal fees, prompting us to ponder whether the sharpness of one's vision may indeed affect the weight of one's mail. This unexpected connection invites further investigation into the optical implications on postage pricing, adding a new dimension to the age-old adage, "Seeing is believing."
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The eye-catching relationship between the number of opticians in Puerto Rico and the cost to send a letter via the USPS has sparked intellectual curiosity and raised eyebrows within the research community. While the connection between visual care and postage pricing may not be immediately apparent, our investigation seeks to shed light on this intriguing association. As we delve into the depths of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Postal Service, it is evident that there is more to this correlation than meets the eye. Our aim is to provide a clear-sighted analysis of this curious phenomenon and unravel the tangled web of optical implications on postal fees.
The realms of optometry and postage might seem like disparate domains, but the statistical evidence we have unearthed hints at a potentially eye-opening relationship. The correlation coefficient of 0.8607016 that emerged from our meticulous analysis piques our interest and beckons us to take a closer look. It is a number that commands attention, much like a striking spectacle that captures one's gaze. Furthermore, the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 serves as a beacon, guiding our quest for understanding amidst the murky waters of correlation and causation.
As we embark on this scholarly voyage, we are not short-sighted in recognizing the novelty and peculiarity of this investigation. The tantalizing prospect of visual acuity influencing the weight of mail adds a new twist to the conventional wisdom of postal pricing. It provokes contemplation and invites whimsical musings about the eyes as unwitting accomplices in determining the cost of correspondence. Therefore, we invite readers to join us in this intellectual foray as we unravel the mysteries of Visual Visionaries: The Vexing Venture of Vision and Postage in Puerto Rico.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Numerous studies have examined the relationship between various socioeconomic factors and postal pricing. Smith (2010) explored the impact of population density on postage costs, while Doe (2015) delved into the influence of technological advancements on postal fees. However, the enchanting entanglement between the number of opticians in Puerto Rico and the cost to send a letter via the USPS has remained relatively unexplored in academic literature. As we survey the existing research landscape, it is apparent that the intersection of visual care professionals and postage pricing presents an intriguing puzzle worthy of investigation.
In "Eyes on the Prize: Exploring Visual Economics" by Jones et al. (2018), the authors discuss the implications of visual acuity on consumer behavior and decision-making processes. While the focus of the book primarily revolves around consumer choices, it offers valuable insights into the potential influence of visual perceptions on various aspects of daily life, including perhaps, the cost of sending mail. Additionally, "Optical Odyssey: A Journey through Visionary Ventures" by Smith and Johnson (2016) provides a comprehensive overview of the optometry industry and its societal impact.
Moving beyond the realm of non-fiction literature, fictional works such as "The Optician's Wife" by Betsy Reavley and "The Visionary's Dilemma" by H.G. Wells serve as intriguing departures into the imaginative landscape of opticians and their enigmatic world. While these literary works may not directly address the correlation between opticians and postage pricing, they offer a peculiar lens through which to view the intertwining of vision and societal dynamics.
On a more lighthearted note, films such as "You've Got Mail" and "The Post" provide charming depictions of the postal industry and the endearing quirks of mail delivery. While these cinematic creations may not provide concrete insights into the relationship between opticians and postal costs, they conjure a whimsical portrayal of the world of mail, where unexpected connections and serendipitous encounters unfold.
In light of the existing literature and cultural representations, the unexplored terrain of visual care professionals and their potential impact on postage pricing beckons for scholarly exploration. The convergence of optometry and postal economics presents a captivating arena for inquiry, promising a trove of discoveries and, dare we say, eye-catching revelations.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of opticians in Puerto Rico and Cost to send a letter via the USPS. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and US Postal Service . You used data from 2006 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Visual Visionaries: The Vexing Venture of Vision and Postage in Puerto Rico
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the curious correlation between the number of opticians in Puerto Rico and the cost to send a letter via the USPS. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Postal Service for the years 2006 to 2022, our research team identified a correlation coefficient of 0.8607016 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest an intriguing association between visual care professionals and postal fees, prompting us to ponder whether the sharpness of one's vision may indeed affect the weight of one's mail. This unexpected connection invites further investigation into the optical implications on postage pricing, adding a new dimension to the age-old adage, "Seeing is believing."
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The eye-catching relationship between the number of opticians in Puerto Rico and the cost to send a letter via the USPS has sparked intellectual curiosity and raised eyebrows within the research community. While the connection between visual care and postage pricing may not be immediately apparent, our investigation seeks to shed light on this intriguing association. As we delve into the depths of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Postal Service, it is evident that there is more to this correlation than meets the eye. Our aim is to provide a clear-sighted analysis of this curious phenomenon and unravel the tangled web of optical implications on postal fees.
The realms of optometry and postage might seem like disparate domains, but the statistical evidence we have unearthed hints at a potentially eye-opening relationship. The correlation coefficient of 0.8607016 that emerged from our meticulous analysis piques our interest and beckons us to take a closer look. It is a number that commands attention, much like a striking spectacle that captures one's gaze. Furthermore, the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 serves as a beacon, guiding our quest for understanding amidst the murky waters of correlation and causation.
As we embark on this scholarly voyage, we are not short-sighted in recognizing the novelty and peculiarity of this investigation. The tantalizing prospect of visual acuity influencing the weight of mail adds a new twist to the conventional wisdom of postal pricing. It provokes contemplation and invites whimsical musings about the eyes as unwitting accomplices in determining the cost of correspondence. Therefore, we invite readers to join us in this intellectual foray as we unravel the mysteries of Visual Visionaries: The Vexing Venture of Vision and Postage in Puerto Rico.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The methodology employed in this research endeavor involved a multifaceted approach to extract, analyze, and decipher the pertinent data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Postal Service. The data collection process spanned the years 2006 to 2022, ensuring a comprehensive scope that encompasses a significant timeframe for robust analysis.
To initiate this investigation, our research team cast a wide net across the internet, much like intrepid anglers seeking a prized catch. The Bureau of Labor Statistics website served as the primary reservoir of occupational data, providing a bounty of information on the number of opticians in Puerto Rico. This data was meticulously harvested with the precision of a skilled horticulturist tending to a garden of statistical blooms.
Simultaneously, the US Postal Service became our beacon in the expanse of postage-related information. Through the navigation of labyrinthine webpages and the mastery of keyword queries, we seized upon the historical postage rates for sending a letter within Puerto Rico. Like intrepid explorers navigating uncharted waters, we charted our course through the labyrinth of postal regulations and pricing structures.
Having amassed these datasets akin to a pair of avid collectors assembling rare specimens, we undertook a process of rigorous cleaning and validation. Outlying data points were scrutinized with the vigilance of a hawk-eyed sentinel, ensuring the sanctity of our analytical foundation. The convergence of these distinct datasets engendered a nexus of statistical intrigue, laying the groundwork for the subsequent correlation analysis.
The crux of our methodology revolved around the application of rigorous statistical techniques. The correlation coefficient was harnessed as a tool to unravel the interplay between the number of opticians and postage fees, akin to an erudite sleuth deciphering cryptic clues. This statistical artefact provided valuable insights into the degree and direction of the relationship, shedding light on the enigmatic connection between visual care and postal pricing. Moreover, the p-value served as our gauge of statistical significance, guiding us through the quagmire of probability and inference.
In summation, our methodology epitomizes a meticulous fusion of data collection, curation, and statistical analysis. The amalgamation of these procedural facets structured our expedition into a beacon of empirical inquiry, illuminating the hitherto unexplored terrain of Visual Visionaries: The Vexing Venture of Vision and Postage in Puerto Rico.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of opticians in Puerto Rico and Cost to send a letter via the USPS. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and US Postal Service .
For the time period 2006 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8607016, r-squared of 0.7408073, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Visual Visionaries: The Vexing Venture of Vision and Postage in Puerto Rico
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the curious correlation between the number of opticians in Puerto Rico and the cost to send a letter via the USPS. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Postal Service for the years 2006 to 2022, our research team identified a correlation coefficient of 0.8607016 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest an intriguing association between visual care professionals and postal fees, prompting us to ponder whether the sharpness of one's vision may indeed affect the weight of one's mail. This unexpected connection invites further investigation into the optical implications on postage pricing, adding a new dimension to the age-old adage, "Seeing is believing."
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The eye-catching relationship between the number of opticians in Puerto Rico and the cost to send a letter via the USPS has sparked intellectual curiosity and raised eyebrows within the research community. While the connection between visual care and postage pricing may not be immediately apparent, our investigation seeks to shed light on this intriguing association. As we delve into the depths of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Postal Service, it is evident that there is more to this correlation than meets the eye. Our aim is to provide a clear-sighted analysis of this curious phenomenon and unravel the tangled web of optical implications on postal fees.
The realms of optometry and postage might seem like disparate domains, but the statistical evidence we have unearthed hints at a potentially eye-opening relationship. The correlation coefficient of 0.8607016 that emerged from our meticulous analysis piques our interest and beckons us to take a closer look. It is a number that commands attention, much like a striking spectacle that captures one's gaze. Furthermore, the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 serves as a beacon, guiding our quest for understanding amidst the murky waters of correlation and causation.
As we embark on this scholarly voyage, we are not short-sighted in recognizing the novelty and peculiarity of this investigation. The tantalizing prospect of visual acuity influencing the weight of mail adds a new twist to the conventional wisdom of postal pricing. It provokes contemplation and invites whimsical musings about the eyes as unwitting accomplices in determining the cost of correspondence. Therefore, we invite readers to join us in this intellectual foray as we unravel the mysteries of Visual Visionaries: The Vexing Venture of Vision and Postage in Puerto Rico.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the connection between the number of opticians in Puerto Rico and the cost to send a letter via the USPS revealed a remarkably strong correlation. Utilizing data from the years 2006 to 2022, the research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8607016 and a substantial r-squared value of 0.7408073, indicating that approximately 74% of the variation in postage pricing can be explained by the number of opticians in the region. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence of the statistical significance of this relationship, reinforcing the robustness of the findings.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between the two variables, which is truly a sight to behold. The scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the pronounced association, capturing the essence of this unexpected link between visual care professionals and postal fees. It provokes thoughtful contemplation on the potential influence of visual acumen on the weight of mail, encouraging us to see beyond the surface and ponder the unseen forces at play in postal pricing dynamics.
These results underscore the unforeseen interplay between the realms of optometry and postage, shedding light on a peculiar yet captivating correlation. The findings beckon further exploration into the optical implications on postage pricing, opening new avenues of research that prompt us to look beyond what meets the eye in the ever-evolving landscape of interdisciplinary inquiry.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of opticians in Puerto Rico and Cost to send a letter via the USPS. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Visual Visionaries: The Vexing Venture of Vision and Postage in Puerto Rico
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the curious correlation between the number of opticians in Puerto Rico and the cost to send a letter via the USPS. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Postal Service for the years 2006 to 2022, our research team identified a correlation coefficient of 0.8607016 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest an intriguing association between visual care professionals and postal fees, prompting us to ponder whether the sharpness of one's vision may indeed affect the weight of one's mail. This unexpected connection invites further investigation into the optical implications on postage pricing, adding a new dimension to the age-old adage, "Seeing is believing."
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Numerous studies have examined the relationship between various socioeconomic factors and postal pricing. Smith (2010) explored the impact of population density on postage costs, while Doe (2015) delved into the influence of technological advancements on postal fees. However, the enchanting entanglement between the number of opticians in Puerto Rico and the cost to send a letter via the USPS has remained relatively unexplored in academic literature. As we survey the existing research landscape, it is apparent that the intersection of visual care professionals and postage pricing presents an intriguing puzzle worthy of investigation.
In "Eyes on the Prize: Exploring Visual Economics" by Jones et al. (2018), the authors discuss the implications of visual acuity on consumer behavior and decision-making processes. While the focus of the book primarily revolves around consumer choices, it offers valuable insights into the potential influence of visual perceptions on various aspects of daily life, including perhaps, the cost of sending mail. Additionally, "Optical Odyssey: A Journey through Visionary Ventures" by Smith and Johnson (2016) provides a comprehensive overview of the optometry industry and its societal impact.
Moving beyond the realm of non-fiction literature, fictional works such as "The Optician's Wife" by Betsy Reavley and "The Visionary's Dilemma" by H.G. Wells serve as intriguing departures into the imaginative landscape of opticians and their enigmatic world. While these literary works may not directly address the correlation between opticians and postage pricing, they offer a peculiar lens through which to view the intertwining of vision and societal dynamics.
On a more lighthearted note, films such as "You've Got Mail" and "The Post" provide charming depictions of the postal industry and the endearing quirks of mail delivery. While these cinematic creations may not provide concrete insights into the relationship between opticians and postal costs, they conjure a whimsical portrayal of the world of mail, where unexpected connections and serendipitous encounters unfold.
In light of the existing literature and cultural representations, the unexplored terrain of visual care professionals and their potential impact on postage pricing beckons for scholarly exploration. The convergence of optometry and postal economics presents a captivating arena for inquiry, promising a trove of discoveries and, dare we say, eye-catching revelations.
[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the connection between the number of opticians in Puerto Rico and the cost to send a letter via the USPS revealed a remarkably strong correlation. Utilizing data from the years 2006 to 2022, the research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8607016 and a substantial r-squared value of 0.7408073, indicating that approximately 74% of the variation in postage pricing can be explained by the number of opticians in the region. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence of the statistical significance of this relationship, reinforcing the robustness of the findings.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between the two variables, which is truly a sight to behold. The scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the pronounced association, capturing the essence of this unexpected link between visual care professionals and postal fees. It provokes thoughtful contemplation on the potential influence of visual acumen on the weight of mail, encouraging us to see beyond the surface and ponder the unseen forces at play in postal pricing dynamics.
These results underscore the unforeseen interplay between the realms of optometry and postage, shedding light on a peculiar yet captivating correlation. The findings beckon further exploration into the optical implications on postage pricing, opening new avenues of research that prompt us to look beyond what meets the eye in the ever-evolving landscape of interdisciplinary inquiry.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The enthralling elucidation of the substantial correlation between the number of opticians in Puerto Rico and the cost to send a letter via the USPS gives rise to a trove of intriguing considerations. Our results align with prior research that has explored the captivating nexus of visual acuity and various facets of daily life, including postal pricing dynamics. The findings offer a delightful confirmatory nod to the works of Jones et al. (2018), whose incisive exploration of visual economics mirrors the unexpected convergence we have uncovered. Indeed, it seems that in the realm of postal pricing, "seeing" does indeed hold a weighty significance, prompting us to contemplate the interplay of vision and behavioral influences on postage costs as Jones and colleagues had so eloquently proposed.
Furthermore, the striking correlation coefficient and the substantial r-squared value not only provide quantitative affirmation of the relationship between opticians and postage pricing but also elevate this unexpected connection to the realm of statistical significance. The p-value's resounding declaration of less than 0.01 adds a compelling layer of tenacity to our findings, anchoring them firmly within the domain of empirical evidence and underscoring the robustness of this association. The statistical underpinnings of our results offer a poignant reminder that behind the veneer of the ordinary lies a world of intricate relationships waiting to be unveiled.
While our study may not directly address the age-old question of whether "the eyes are the windows to postage pricing," the remarkable correlation unearthed in this investigation invites a whimsical yet thought-provoking speculation. Could the keen discernment of opticians influence not only the clarity of vision but also the weight of mail? Perhaps the optics of postal pricing hold within them an enigmatic tale of the unseen forces at play, beckoning us to peer beyond the mundane surface and delve into the captivating depths of interdisciplinary inquiry.
The findings engender an air of scholarly intrigue, prompting us to embrace this unforeseen intersection of optometry and postal economics with a discerning eye. Our research endeavors provoke a newfound appreciation for the unforeseen connections and idiosyncrasies that infuse the fabric of everyday life, urging us to probe further into the enigmatic world of visual visionaries and their unexpected impact on the postage pricing landscape.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of opticians in Puerto Rico and Cost to send a letter via the USPS. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Visual Visionaries: The Vexing Venture of Vision and Postage in Puerto Rico
[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the curious correlation between the number of opticians in Puerto Rico and the cost to send a letter via the USPS. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Postal Service for the years 2006 to 2022, our research team identified a correlation coefficient of 0.8607016 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest an intriguing association between visual care professionals and postal fees, prompting us to ponder whether the sharpness of one's vision may indeed affect the weight of one's mail. This unexpected connection invites further investigation into the optical implications on postage pricing, adding a new dimension to the age-old adage, "Seeing is believing."
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The eye-catching relationship between the number of opticians in Puerto Rico and the cost to send a letter via the USPS has sparked intellectual curiosity and raised eyebrows within the research community. While the connection between visual care and postage pricing may not be immediately apparent, our investigation seeks to shed light on this intriguing association. As we delve into the depths of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Postal Service, it is evident that there is more to this correlation than meets the eye. Our aim is to provide a clear-sighted analysis of this curious phenomenon and unravel the tangled web of optical implications on postal fees.
The realms of optometry and postage might seem like disparate domains, but the statistical evidence we have unearthed hints at a potentially eye-opening relationship. The correlation coefficient of 0.8607016 that emerged from our meticulous analysis piques our interest and beckons us to take a closer look. It is a number that commands attention, much like a striking spectacle that captures one's gaze. Furthermore, the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 serves as a beacon, guiding our quest for understanding amidst the murky waters of correlation and causation.
As we embark on this scholarly voyage, we are not short-sighted in recognizing the novelty and peculiarity of this investigation. The tantalizing prospect of visual acuity influencing the weight of mail adds a new twist to the conventional wisdom of postal pricing. It provokes contemplation and invites whimsical musings about the eyes as unwitting accomplices in determining the cost of correspondence. Therefore, we invite readers to join us in this intellectual foray as we unravel the mysteries of Visual Visionaries: The Vexing Venture of Vision and Postage in Puerto Rico.
[[RESULTS]]
The investigation into the connection between the number of opticians in Puerto Rico and the cost to send a letter via the USPS revealed a remarkably strong correlation. Utilizing data from the years 2006 to 2022, the research team uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8607016 and a substantial r-squared value of 0.7408073, indicating that approximately 74% of the variation in postage pricing can be explained by the number of opticians in the region. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence of the statistical significance of this relationship, reinforcing the robustness of the findings.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the striking correlation between the two variables, which is truly a sight to behold. The scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the pronounced association, capturing the essence of this unexpected link between visual care professionals and postal fees. It provokes thoughtful contemplation on the potential influence of visual acumen on the weight of mail, encouraging us to see beyond the surface and ponder the unseen forces at play in postal pricing dynamics.
These results underscore the unforeseen interplay between the realms of optometry and postage, shedding light on a peculiar yet captivating correlation. The findings beckon further exploration into the optical implications on postage pricing, opening new avenues of research that prompt us to look beyond what meets the eye in the ever-evolving landscape of interdisciplinary inquiry.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our investigation into the peculiar correlation between the number of opticians in Puerto Rico and the cost to send a letter via the USPS has shed light on an unexpected relationship. The remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.8607016 and the statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 have, pardon the pun, "opened our eyes" to the potential influence of visual care professionals on postal fees. These findings, much like a pair of high-quality eyeglasses, have given us a clearer perspective on the intricate interplay between sight and postage.
Our scholarly odyssey has not only unraveled the mysteries of this connection but also raised thought-provoking questions that, like a dense fog, obscure our understanding of postal pricing dynamics. The scatter plot, a visual masterpiece in its own right, serves as a poignant reminder of the captivating allure of unexpected correlations and challenges us to see patterns beyond the surface.
While this research offers a compelling glimpse into the optical implications on postage pricing, it certainly opens the door to a multitude of creative and, dare we say, "eye-catching" future studies in this curious domain. Nevertheless, much like a deliciously ambiguous optical illusion, we assert that no further research on this intriguing topic is needed. The findings stand firm, as clear as 20/20 vision, in their revelatory impact on the scholarly landscape.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Visual Visionaries: The Vexing Venture of Vision and Postage in Puerto Rico. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Opticopia
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Visual Visionaries: The Vexing Venture of Vision and Postage in Puerto Rico. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Institute for Applied Optics and Postal Philately
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Visual Visionaries: The Vexing Venture of Vision and Postage in Puerto Rico with an abstract of This paper examines the curious correlation between the number of opticians in Puerto Rico and the cost to send a letter via the USPS. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the US Postal Service for the years 2006 to 2022, our research team identified a correlation coefficient of 0.8607016 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. The results suggest an intriguing association between visual care professionals and postal fees, prompting us to ponder whether the sharpness of one's vision may indeed affect the weight of one's mail. This unexpected connection invites further investigation into the optical implications on postage pricing, adding a new dimension to the age-old adage, "Seeing is believing.
ChatGPT:
opticians in Puerto Rico, post offices, USPS, Bureau of Labor Statistics, postal fees, vision care professionals, postage pricing, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, optometry, visual impairment, mail weight, sight and postage, vision and mail costs
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
The number of opticians in Puerto RicoDetailed data title: BLS estimate of opticians, dispensing in Puerto Rico
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of opticians in Puerto Rico
Cost to send a letter via the USPS
Detailed data title: US Postal Service Letter Rate
Source: US Postal Service
See what else correlates with Cost to send a letter via the USPS
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.7408073 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 74.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Cost to send a letter via the USPS) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of opticians in Puerto Rico) over the 17 years from 2006 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.2E-6. 0.0000092345165105075040000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 0.00092% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 108,289 random variables You don't actually need 108 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 16 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 16 because we have two variables measured over a period of 17 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.65, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
The number of opticians in Puerto Rico (Opticians, Dispensing) | 580 | 330 | 510 | 440 | 440 | 380 | 560 | 520 | 770 | 600 | 530 | 790 | 770 | 990 | 1000 | 780 | 1020 |
Cost to send a letter via the USPS (US Dollar per first ounce) | 0.39 | 0.41 | 0.42 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.45 | 0.46 | 0.49 | 0.49 | 0.47 | 0.49 | 0.5 | 0.55 | 0.55 | 0.58 | 0.6 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([580,330,510,440,440,380,560,520,770,600,530,790,770,990,1000,780,1020,])
array_2 = np.array([0.39,0.41,0.42,0.44,0.44,0.44,0.45,0.46,0.49,0.49,0.47,0.49,0.5,0.55,0.55,0.58,0.6,])
array_1_name = "The number of opticians in Puerto Rico"
array_2_name = "Cost to send a letter via the USPS"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only The number of opticians in Puerto Rico
- Line chart for only Cost to send a letter via the USPS
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Visual Visionaries: The Vexing Venture of Vision and Postage in Puerto Rico
You're the correlation whisperer we needed!
Correlation ID: 3252 · Black Variable ID: 16717 · Red Variable ID: 474