about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,247 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and the second variable is The number of social workers in Louisiana.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the GMO cotton dwindled, so did the giant cotton balls, leading to a decline in the demand for makeshift stress balls in social work offices. Without these handy stress-relievers, social workers found themselves unable to cope with the growing pressures of their job, prompting many to seek alternative career paths that didn't require as much emotional resilience. In essence, the root of their job satisfaction was ginned away, leaving them in a tangled mess of despair.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Description: In a Louisiana field, cotton plants are being attacked by pests, causing distress to the once vibrant crop. In the background, a few social workers stand by, observing the diminishing need for their assistance due to the decrease in the cotton industry's activity. Image prompt: Generate an image featuring a surreal scene of an expansive Louisiana field where cotton plants, anthropomorphized as delicate human-like figures, are seen under distress. They are being attacked by surreal, larger-than-life pests with fantastical features, such as exaggerated proportions or otherworldly appearances. The background showcases a few surreal, ghostly silhouettes resembling social workers, standing by and observing the scene. The setting should exude an otherworldly, dreamlike quality through the use of vibrant colors and ethereal lighting. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The number of social workers in Louisiana. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cute cartoon Photorealism Concept art Cutsy art illustration Surrealism
ChatGPT: Surrealism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The number of social workers in Louisiana, in the following situation: Because the decrease in GMO use in cotton led to an increase in the number of naturally occurring cotton pests, which in turn resulted in more distressed cotton fields, reducing the need for social workers in Louisiana.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a Louisiana field, we see cotton plants attacked by pests, causing distress to the once vibrant crop. In the background, we notice a few social workers standing by, observing the diminishing need for their assistance due to the decrease in the cotton industry's activity.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Surrealism ] and depicting this scene: In a Louisiana field, we see cotton plants attacked by pests, causing distress to the once vibrant crop. In the background, we notice a few social workers standing by, observing the diminishing need for their assistance due to the decrease in the cotton industry's activity. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Description: In a Louisiana field, cotton plants are being attacked by pests, causing distress to the once vibrant crop. In the background, a few social workers stand by, observing the diminishing need for their assistance due to the decrease in the cotton industry's activity. Image prompt: Generate an image featuring a surreal scene of an expansive Louisiana field where cotton plants, anthropomorphized as delicate human-like figures, are seen under distress. They are being attacked by surreal, larger-than-life pests with fantastical features, such as exaggerated proportions or otherworldly appearances. The background showcases a few surreal, ghostly silhouettes resembling social workers, standing by and observing the scene. The setting should exude an otherworldly, dreamlike quality through the use of vibrant colors and ethereal lighting.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in cotton in Louisiana caused The number of social workers in Louisiana to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Cott-on or Cott-off: Analyzing the Relationship Between GMO Cotton and the Presence of Social Workers in Louisiana

The Journal of Transgenic Textiles

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The number of social workers in Louisiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8971505 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Cott-on or Cott-off: Analyzing the Relationship Between GMO Cotton and the Presence of Social Workers in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the perplexing yet intriguing connection between the usage of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in the state of Louisiana and the number of social workers in the same area. Leveraging data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.8971505 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This investigation sheds light on the potential influence of GMO cotton on the demand for social workers in Louisiana, providing fodder for lighthearted discussions on the unexpected interplay between agricultural practices and social welfare.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The number of social workers in Louisiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cott-on or Cott-off: Analyzing the Relationship Between GMO Cotton and the Presence of Social Workers in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the perplexing yet intriguing connection between the usage of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in the state of Louisiana and the number of social workers in the same area. Leveraging data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.8971505 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This investigation sheds light on the potential influence of GMO cotton on the demand for social workers in Louisiana, providing fodder for lighthearted discussions on the unexpected interplay between agricultural practices and social welfare.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In recent years, the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) crops has become as ubiquitous as puns in a dad jokes competition. Louisiana, known for its vibrant cotton industry, has not been immune to this trend. As the adoption of GMO cotton has spread like wildfire, so has the curiosity about its potential social impacts, including a possible connection to the number of social workers in the state. This paper aims to explore the unexpected and perhaps whimsical relationship between the use of GMO cotton and the presence of social workers in Louisiana.

While the notion of GMO cotton influencing the demand for social workers may initially sound as far-fetched as finding a needle in a haystack, our preliminary analysis, much like a magician pulling off a seemingly impossible trick, has revealed a compelling correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables. The data gathered from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics between 2003 and 2022 has provided us with a treasure trove of information to uncover this intriguing association.

The objective of this study, then, is to delve into this enigmatic correlation, unraveling its intricacies much like a detective unraveling a perplexing case. By undertaking this investigation, we endeavor to not only contribute to the scholarly literature but also to spark lively conversations about the unexpected interplay between agricultural practices and the social fabric of a community.

It is in this spirit of lighthearted curiosity and academic inquiry that we present our findings, which may leave readers both scratching their heads and laughing out loud. So, without further ado, let us embark on this whimsical journey into the world of GMO cotton and social work in Louisiana.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The number of social workers in Louisiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cott-on or Cott-off: Analyzing the Relationship Between GMO Cotton and the Presence of Social Workers in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the perplexing yet intriguing connection between the usage of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in the state of Louisiana and the number of social workers in the same area. Leveraging data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.8971505 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This investigation sheds light on the potential influence of GMO cotton on the demand for social workers in Louisiana, providing fodder for lighthearted discussions on the unexpected interplay between agricultural practices and social welfare.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In recent years, the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) crops has become as ubiquitous as puns in a dad jokes competition. Louisiana, known for its vibrant cotton industry, has not been immune to this trend. As the adoption of GMO cotton has spread like wildfire, so has the curiosity about its potential social impacts, including a possible connection to the number of social workers in the state. This paper aims to explore the unexpected and perhaps whimsical relationship between the use of GMO cotton and the presence of social workers in Louisiana.
While the notion of GMO cotton influencing the demand for social workers may initially sound as far-fetched as finding a needle in a haystack, our preliminary analysis, much like a magician pulling off a seemingly impossible trick, has revealed a compelling correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables. The data gathered from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics between 2003 and 2022 has provided us with a treasure trove of information to uncover this intriguing association.
The objective of this study, then, is to delve into this enigmatic correlation, unraveling its intricacies much like a detective unraveling a perplexing case. By undertaking this investigation, we endeavor to not only contribute to the scholarly literature but also to spark lively conversations about the unexpected interplay between agricultural practices and the social fabric of a community.
It is in this spirit of lighthearted curiosity and academic inquiry that we present our findings, which may leave readers both scratching their heads and laughing out loud. So, without further ado, let us embark on this whimsical journey into the world of GMO cotton and social work in Louisiana.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between the utilization of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in agricultural practices and the presence of social workers in Louisiana has sparked an unexpected whirlwind of research and speculation. The authors find in "Smith et al." that the prevalence of GMO cotton cultivation has grown exponentially in recent years, much like a weed taking over a garden. This expansion raises the question of whether there could be any unforeseen ramifications on the social welfare landscape of the state.

In "Doe's study," the authors delve into the potential societal implications of GMO crop adoption, shedding light on the possible ripple effects that could extend beyond the agricultural sector. Similarly, "Jones' research" investigates the broader impacts of GMO crops on local communities, hinting at the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and social dynamics.

Moving beyond these traditional academic inquiries, it is worth considering the broader cultural and literary landscape to glean insights into the intersection between agriculture and social welfare. Books such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "The World Without Us" by Alan Weisman provide thought-provoking perspectives on the complexities of modern agricultural practices and their societal consequences. These works prompt readers to contemplate the far-reaching effects of human intervention in natural ecosystems, akin to unraveling a perplexing mystery in the realm of agricultural and environmental literature.

On a lighter note, fiction books such as "Cotton Malone Series" by Steve Berry and "The Secret Life of Bees" by Sue Monk Kidd offer imaginative yet tangentially relevant narratives in the realm of cotton cultivation. While these works may not provide direct insights into the correlation between GMO cotton and social work, they add a whimsical touch to the conversation, much like sprinkling confetti on a serious discussion.

In the realm of internet culture, memes such as "GMO Cotton Fields" offer a playful take on the juxtaposition of agricultural landscapes and popular culture. These lighthearted references to GMO cotton, albeit in a humorous context, underscore the pervasive influence of agricultural practices on public consciousness, much like a catchy jingle that refuses to leave one's mind.

These diverse sources, ranging from scholarly research to cultural artifacts, underscore the multifaceted nature of the inquiry into the relationship between GMO cotton and the presence of social workers in Louisiana. As we navigate through this amalgamation of perspectives, it becomes evident that the intersection of agriculture and social welfare is rife with unexpected connections and a touch of whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The number of social workers in Louisiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cott-on or Cott-off: Analyzing the Relationship Between GMO Cotton and the Presence of Social Workers in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the perplexing yet intriguing connection between the usage of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in the state of Louisiana and the number of social workers in the same area. Leveraging data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.8971505 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This investigation sheds light on the potential influence of GMO cotton on the demand for social workers in Louisiana, providing fodder for lighthearted discussions on the unexpected interplay between agricultural practices and social welfare.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In recent years, the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) crops has become as ubiquitous as puns in a dad jokes competition. Louisiana, known for its vibrant cotton industry, has not been immune to this trend. As the adoption of GMO cotton has spread like wildfire, so has the curiosity about its potential social impacts, including a possible connection to the number of social workers in the state. This paper aims to explore the unexpected and perhaps whimsical relationship between the use of GMO cotton and the presence of social workers in Louisiana.
While the notion of GMO cotton influencing the demand for social workers may initially sound as far-fetched as finding a needle in a haystack, our preliminary analysis, much like a magician pulling off a seemingly impossible trick, has revealed a compelling correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables. The data gathered from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics between 2003 and 2022 has provided us with a treasure trove of information to uncover this intriguing association.
The objective of this study, then, is to delve into this enigmatic correlation, unraveling its intricacies much like a detective unraveling a perplexing case. By undertaking this investigation, we endeavor to not only contribute to the scholarly literature but also to spark lively conversations about the unexpected interplay between agricultural practices and the social fabric of a community.
It is in this spirit of lighthearted curiosity and academic inquiry that we present our findings, which may leave readers both scratching their heads and laughing out loud. So, without further ado, let us embark on this whimsical journey into the world of GMO cotton and social work in Louisiana.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this study involved a comedic blend of data collection and analysis that would make even the most serious statistician crack a smile. First, data on the adoption of GMO cotton in Louisiana was garnered from the USDA's comprehensive databases, akin to unearthing hidden treasures in a digital cornucopia. The utilization of such data allowed for a nuanced understanding of the prevalence and spread of GMO cotton cultivation across the state, setting the stage for the subsequent analysis.

Simultaneously, information on the employment of social workers in Louisiana was extracted from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, akin to locating a rare species of flora in a dense jungle of occupational data. This data provided insights into the number and distribution of social workers in the state, serving as the cornerstone for evaluating the potential correlation between their presence and the use of GMO cotton.

The statistical analysis was performed with the finesse of a composer orchestrating a symphony, utilizing techniques such as regression analysis and correlation coefficients to unveil the potential relationship between the adoption of GMO cotton and the number of social workers in Louisiana. Our study also took into account various control variables, thereby reducing the possibility of spurious correlations and ensuring that the findings were as robust as a well-constructed Lego castle.

Additionally, to gauge the robustness of our results, sensitivity analyses were conducted, akin to stress-testing the structural integrity of a whimsical gingerbread house. These analyses involved varying the time periods and different statistical methodologies, ensuring that the observed relationship withstood the scrutiny of alternative approaches.

Furthermore, in the spirit of academic transparency and open-minded inquiry, potential limitations of the study were acknowledged. Though the data sources used were as trustworthy as a loyal Labrador retriever, caveats regarding potential measurement error and omitted variable bias were recognized, ensuring that the findings were presented with a sprinkle of cautious optimism.

Overall, the methodological approach adopted in this study sought to blend the rigors of empirical analysis with a touch of whimsy and humor, elevating the process from a mundane academic exercise to an enjoyable intellectual escapade.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The number of social workers in Louisiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8971505, r-squared of 0.8048791, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cott-on or Cott-off: Analyzing the Relationship Between GMO Cotton and the Presence of Social Workers in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the perplexing yet intriguing connection between the usage of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in the state of Louisiana and the number of social workers in the same area. Leveraging data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.8971505 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This investigation sheds light on the potential influence of GMO cotton on the demand for social workers in Louisiana, providing fodder for lighthearted discussions on the unexpected interplay between agricultural practices and social welfare.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In recent years, the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) crops has become as ubiquitous as puns in a dad jokes competition. Louisiana, known for its vibrant cotton industry, has not been immune to this trend. As the adoption of GMO cotton has spread like wildfire, so has the curiosity about its potential social impacts, including a possible connection to the number of social workers in the state. This paper aims to explore the unexpected and perhaps whimsical relationship between the use of GMO cotton and the presence of social workers in Louisiana.
While the notion of GMO cotton influencing the demand for social workers may initially sound as far-fetched as finding a needle in a haystack, our preliminary analysis, much like a magician pulling off a seemingly impossible trick, has revealed a compelling correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables. The data gathered from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics between 2003 and 2022 has provided us with a treasure trove of information to uncover this intriguing association.
The objective of this study, then, is to delve into this enigmatic correlation, unraveling its intricacies much like a detective unraveling a perplexing case. By undertaking this investigation, we endeavor to not only contribute to the scholarly literature but also to spark lively conversations about the unexpected interplay between agricultural practices and the social fabric of a community.
It is in this spirit of lighthearted curiosity and academic inquiry that we present our findings, which may leave readers both scratching their heads and laughing out loud. So, without further ado, let us embark on this whimsical journey into the world of GMO cotton and social work in Louisiana.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis unveil a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8971505 between the usage of GMO cotton in Louisiana and the number of social workers in the same vicinity during the period of 2003 to 2022. This symbolizes a robust relationship that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance or coincidence, much like stumbling upon a four-leaf clover in a vast field of cotton.

The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8048791 further emphasizes the substantial proportion of the variance in the number of social workers that can be explained by the utilization of GMO cotton. This finding mirrors the clarity of a crystal ball in a fortune teller's hovel, providing a glimpse into the foreseeable influence of GMO cotton on social work in Louisiana.

Furthermore, the statistical analysis yields a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying that the observed correlation is statistically significant. This result solidifies the notion that the association between GMO cotton and the presence of social workers in Louisiana is not mere happenstance, but a genuine relationship deserving of further scrutiny.

Additionally, the visual representation of this correlation is vividly depicted in Fig. 1, which showcases a scatterplot highlighting the robust link between the use of GMO cotton and the number of social workers in Louisiana. This graph serves as a concrete manifestation of the data's orderly alignment, much like a perfectly knit sweater in a cozy cotton plantation.

In conclusion, our investigation has unearthed a compelling association between GMO cotton and the demand for social workers in Louisiana, prompting further discussion and inquiry into the unexpected interplay between agricultural practices and social welfare. This finding serves as a whimsical reminder that the world of research, much like a box of chocolates, is often full of delightful surprises.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The number of social workers in Louisiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Cott-on or Cott-off: Analyzing the Relationship Between GMO Cotton and the Presence of Social Workers in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the perplexing yet intriguing connection between the usage of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in the state of Louisiana and the number of social workers in the same area. Leveraging data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.8971505 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This investigation sheds light on the potential influence of GMO cotton on the demand for social workers in Louisiana, providing fodder for lighthearted discussions on the unexpected interplay between agricultural practices and social welfare.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between the utilization of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in agricultural practices and the presence of social workers in Louisiana has sparked an unexpected whirlwind of research and speculation. The authors find in "Smith et al." that the prevalence of GMO cotton cultivation has grown exponentially in recent years, much like a weed taking over a garden. This expansion raises the question of whether there could be any unforeseen ramifications on the social welfare landscape of the state.
In "Doe's study," the authors delve into the potential societal implications of GMO crop adoption, shedding light on the possible ripple effects that could extend beyond the agricultural sector. Similarly, "Jones' research" investigates the broader impacts of GMO crops on local communities, hinting at the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and social dynamics.
Moving beyond these traditional academic inquiries, it is worth considering the broader cultural and literary landscape to glean insights into the intersection between agriculture and social welfare. Books such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "The World Without Us" by Alan Weisman provide thought-provoking perspectives on the complexities of modern agricultural practices and their societal consequences. These works prompt readers to contemplate the far-reaching effects of human intervention in natural ecosystems, akin to unraveling a perplexing mystery in the realm of agricultural and environmental literature.
On a lighter note, fiction books such as "Cotton Malone Series" by Steve Berry and "The Secret Life of Bees" by Sue Monk Kidd offer imaginative yet tangentially relevant narratives in the realm of cotton cultivation. While these works may not provide direct insights into the correlation between GMO cotton and social work, they add a whimsical touch to the conversation, much like sprinkling confetti on a serious discussion.
In the realm of internet culture, memes such as "GMO Cotton Fields" offer a playful take on the juxtaposition of agricultural landscapes and popular culture. These lighthearted references to GMO cotton, albeit in a humorous context, underscore the pervasive influence of agricultural practices on public consciousness, much like a catchy jingle that refuses to leave one's mind.
These diverse sources, ranging from scholarly research to cultural artifacts, underscore the multifaceted nature of the inquiry into the relationship between GMO cotton and the presence of social workers in Louisiana. As we navigate through this amalgamation of perspectives, it becomes evident that the intersection of agriculture and social welfare is rife with unexpected connections and a touch of whimsy.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis unveil a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8971505 between the usage of GMO cotton in Louisiana and the number of social workers in the same vicinity during the period of 2003 to 2022. This symbolizes a robust relationship that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance or coincidence, much like stumbling upon a four-leaf clover in a vast field of cotton.
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8048791 further emphasizes the substantial proportion of the variance in the number of social workers that can be explained by the utilization of GMO cotton. This finding mirrors the clarity of a crystal ball in a fortune teller's hovel, providing a glimpse into the foreseeable influence of GMO cotton on social work in Louisiana.
Furthermore, the statistical analysis yields a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying that the observed correlation is statistically significant. This result solidifies the notion that the association between GMO cotton and the presence of social workers in Louisiana is not mere happenstance, but a genuine relationship deserving of further scrutiny.
Additionally, the visual representation of this correlation is vividly depicted in Fig. 1, which showcases a scatterplot highlighting the robust link between the use of GMO cotton and the number of social workers in Louisiana. This graph serves as a concrete manifestation of the data's orderly alignment, much like a perfectly knit sweater in a cozy cotton plantation.
In conclusion, our investigation has unearthed a compelling association between GMO cotton and the demand for social workers in Louisiana, prompting further discussion and inquiry into the unexpected interplay between agricultural practices and social welfare. This finding serves as a whimsical reminder that the world of research, much like a box of chocolates, is often full of delightful surprises.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study reinforce and extend prior research on the relationship between the usage of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in Louisiana and the presence of social workers, shedding light on the intriguing interplay between agricultural practices and social welfare. Our findings align with the growing body of literature that has broached this unconventional topic, underscoring the unexpected but substantial connection between GMO cotton and social work demand.

Echoing the sentiments of "Smith et al.," our research unravels a robust correlation between the prevalence of GMO cotton cultivation and the number of social workers in Louisiana, akin to how a skilled seamstress weaves intricate patterns into a tapestry. This corroborates the notion that the expansion of GMO cotton could indeed have tangible effects on the social welfare landscape of the state, warranting meticulous attention akin to unraveling an enthralling mystery spun from cotton threads.

Furthermore, our results resonate with the thought-provoking perspectives offered in "Doe's study" and "Jones' research," which have highlighted the potential societal implications and broader impacts of GMO crop adoption. The statistically significant relationship uncovered in our analysis signifies a tangible narrative akin to a compelling plot twist in the realm of agricultural practices and social dynamics, garnering attention akin to a best-selling thriller novel.

Moreover, our investigation delves into the hitherto unexplored territory of the cultural and literary landscape, drawing parallels with the whimsical narratives of "Cotton Malone Series" by Steve Berry and "The Secret Life of Bees" by Sue Monk Kidd. While these works may not offer direct insights into the correlation between GMO cotton and social work, they infuse a touch of levity into the discourse, akin to sprinkling confetti on a serious discussion, and prompt contemplation of the intricate web of connections between agriculture and social welfare.

In alignment with the multifaceted nature of the inquiry into this relationship highlighted in the literature review, our study synthesizes diverse perspectives to fortify the understanding of the unexpected yet undeniable association between GMO cotton and the demand for social workers in Louisiana. The vivid manifestation of this connection in our results serves as a whimsical reminder that the world of research, much like a box of chocolates, is often full of delightful surprises.

The unexpected nature of the correlation unveiled in this research paves the way for future investigations to delve deeper into the mechanisms underlying this intriguing relationship, much like peeling back the layers of an enigmatic onion. Our findings open the door to further scholarly inquiry and pose fascinating questions that beckon exploration, akin to embarking on an adventure in uncharted territory.

The interplay between agricultural practices and social welfare, though initially surprising and whimsical, necessitates thorough investigation and contemplation, akin to navigating through an intricate labyrinth. As researchers, we are poised to delve into this unconventional yet compelling domain, much like intrepid explorers embarking on a riveting expedition, to unravel the enigmatic relationship between GMO cotton and the presence of social workers in Louisiana.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Louisiana and The number of social workers in Louisiana. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Cott-on or Cott-off: Analyzing the Relationship Between GMO Cotton and the Presence of Social Workers in Louisiana

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper delves into the perplexing yet intriguing connection between the usage of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in the state of Louisiana and the number of social workers in the same area. Leveraging data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.8971505 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This investigation sheds light on the potential influence of GMO cotton on the demand for social workers in Louisiana, providing fodder for lighthearted discussions on the unexpected interplay between agricultural practices and social welfare.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In recent years, the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) crops has become as ubiquitous as puns in a dad jokes competition. Louisiana, known for its vibrant cotton industry, has not been immune to this trend. As the adoption of GMO cotton has spread like wildfire, so has the curiosity about its potential social impacts, including a possible connection to the number of social workers in the state. This paper aims to explore the unexpected and perhaps whimsical relationship between the use of GMO cotton and the presence of social workers in Louisiana.
While the notion of GMO cotton influencing the demand for social workers may initially sound as far-fetched as finding a needle in a haystack, our preliminary analysis, much like a magician pulling off a seemingly impossible trick, has revealed a compelling correlation between these two seemingly unrelated variables. The data gathered from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics between 2003 and 2022 has provided us with a treasure trove of information to uncover this intriguing association.
The objective of this study, then, is to delve into this enigmatic correlation, unraveling its intricacies much like a detective unraveling a perplexing case. By undertaking this investigation, we endeavor to not only contribute to the scholarly literature but also to spark lively conversations about the unexpected interplay between agricultural practices and the social fabric of a community.
It is in this spirit of lighthearted curiosity and academic inquiry that we present our findings, which may leave readers both scratching their heads and laughing out loud. So, without further ado, let us embark on this whimsical journey into the world of GMO cotton and social work in Louisiana.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis unveil a rather striking correlation coefficient of 0.8971505 between the usage of GMO cotton in Louisiana and the number of social workers in the same vicinity during the period of 2003 to 2022. This symbolizes a robust relationship that cannot be dismissed as mere happenstance or coincidence, much like stumbling upon a four-leaf clover in a vast field of cotton.
The coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8048791 further emphasizes the substantial proportion of the variance in the number of social workers that can be explained by the utilization of GMO cotton. This finding mirrors the clarity of a crystal ball in a fortune teller's hovel, providing a glimpse into the foreseeable influence of GMO cotton on social work in Louisiana.
Furthermore, the statistical analysis yields a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying that the observed correlation is statistically significant. This result solidifies the notion that the association between GMO cotton and the presence of social workers in Louisiana is not mere happenstance, but a genuine relationship deserving of further scrutiny.
Additionally, the visual representation of this correlation is vividly depicted in Fig. 1, which showcases a scatterplot highlighting the robust link between the use of GMO cotton and the number of social workers in Louisiana. This graph serves as a concrete manifestation of the data's orderly alignment, much like a perfectly knit sweater in a cozy cotton plantation.
In conclusion, our investigation has unearthed a compelling association between GMO cotton and the demand for social workers in Louisiana, prompting further discussion and inquiry into the unexpected interplay between agricultural practices and social welfare. This finding serves as a whimsical reminder that the world of research, much like a box of chocolates, is often full of delightful surprises.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our analysis has illuminated a remarkably robust correlation between the usage of GMO cotton in Louisiana and the number of social workers in the same domain. This unexpected relationship, akin to discovering a hidden treasure map in a cotton field, prompts contemplation of the potential influence of agricultural practices on the social fabric of a community. The statistically significant p-value further underscores the legitimacy of this association, leaving little room for doubt, much like a magician's successful performance leaving audiences in awe.

This investigation, much like a captivating mystery novel, has unraveled an unforeseen and enthralling connection, offering a whimsical twist to scholarly discourse. The correlation coefficient and coefficient of determination, reminiscent of a perfectly executed dance routine, demonstrate the compelling synchrony between GMO cotton and the demand for social workers in Louisiana.

The findings presented here, much like a surprising plot twist in a comedic movie, serve to pique curiosity and stimulate lively and lighthearted discussions about the unanticipated interplay of seemingly unrelated variables. As such, we assert that further exploration of this peculiar correlation is both warranted and encouraged, as it adds a dash of flavor to the otherwise serious landscape of research inquiry.

However, after this exhaustive investigation, we confidently assert that no more research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Cott-on or Cott-off: Analyzing the Relationship Between GMO Cotton and the Presence of Social Workers in Louisiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Transgenic Textiles


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Cott-on or Cott-off: Analyzing the Relationship Between GMO Cotton and the Presence of Social Workers in Louisiana. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Agricultural Innovation and Social Impact


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Cott-on or Cott-off: Analyzing the Relationship Between GMO Cotton and the Presence of Social Workers in Louisiana with an abstract of This paper delves into the perplexing yet intriguing connection between the usage of genetically modified organism (GMO) cotton in the state of Louisiana and the number of social workers in the same area. Leveraging data from the USDA and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning from 2003 to 2022, our research team reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.8971505 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. This investigation sheds light on the potential influence of GMO cotton on the demand for social workers in Louisiana, providing fodder for lighthearted discussions on the unexpected interplay between agricultural practices and social welfare.

ChatGPT:

GMO cotton, Louisiana social workers, genetically modified organism cotton, Louisiana agriculture, social worker demand, GMO cotton impact, Louisiana labor statistics, cotton farming influence, GMO cotton correlation, Louisiana social welfare, cotton cultivation, social work demand

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in Louisiana
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in Louisiana that is genetically modified to be insect-resistant (Bt), but not herbicide-tolerant (HT)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in Louisiana

The number of social workers in Louisiana
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of child, family, and school social workers in Louisiana
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of social workers in Louisiana

Correlation r = 0.8971505 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8048791 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 80.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of social workers in Louisiana) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in Louisiana) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.4E-8. 0.0000000837560315352655000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 8.4E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 11,939,439 random variables You don't actually need 11 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.75, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in cotton in Louisiana (GMO cotton %)302621131719201926241945104337106
The number of social workers in Louisiana (Laborers)382032202850264025302680241024502220225018508109101090920620450430390550




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([30,26,21,13,17,19,20,19,26,24,19,4,5,10,4,3,3,7,10,6,])
array_2 = np.array([3820,3220,2850,2640,2530,2680,2410,2450,2220,2250,1850,810,910,1090,920,620,450,430,390,550,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in Louisiana"
array_2_name = "The number of social workers in Louisiana"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Kudos for rating!


Correlation ID: 3247 · Black Variable ID: 771 · Red Variable ID: 8641
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0