about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,243 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and the second variable is Hollister retail store count worldwide.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the corn in Kansas grew taller thanks to GMOs, it created a higher demand for overalls, and Hollister was ready to overaller the market with their latest styles. They saw the opportunity and jumped in, just like corn in a popcorn machine!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Sure, here's an image prompt that might lead to an interesting visual: Prompt: [ inspired by bauhaus ] Generate an image of a futuristic Kansas cornfield where oversized maize towers over a row of sleek Hollister retail stores. Fashion-forward individuals, reflecting the influence of the colossal corn, browse through racks of trendy clothing amidst the bustling scene. This prompt should encourage the AI to create a visually striking and imaginative representation of the scene you've described, drawing on the style of bauhaus to enhance the aesthetic appeal. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic a meme Woodblock painting inspired by bauhaus Hyper-realistic
ChatGPT: inspired by bauhaus

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and Hollister retail store count worldwide, in the following situation: Because increased GMO use in Kansas corn resulted in super-sizing effects, causing consumers to demand larger sizes of clothing, leading to the expansion of Hollister retail stores worldwide to accommodate the growing population of giant fashion-forward corn-fed individuals.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast Kansas cornfield, towering stalks of genetically modified maize stretch towards the sky, their oversized ears bursting with plump, golden kernels. Nearby, a row of flourishing Hollister retail stores dot the landscape, their facades adorned with the iconic seagull logo, welcoming fashion-savvy shoppers from around the world. Among the bustling crowds, stylish, larger-than-life individuals, their attire reflecting the influence of the colossal corn, browse through racks of trendy clothing, embracing the unique demands of a population driven by the super-sizing effects of GMO corn.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ inspired by bauhaus ] and depicting this scene: In a vast Kansas cornfield, towering stalks of genetically modified maize stretch towards the sky, their oversized ears bursting with plump, golden kernels. Nearby, a row of flourishing Hollister retail stores dot the landscape, their facades adorned with the iconic seagull logo, welcoming fashion-savvy shoppers from around the world. Among the bustling crowds, stylish, larger-than-life individuals, their attire reflecting the influence of the colossal corn, browse through racks of trendy clothing, embracing the unique demands of a population driven by the super-sizing effects of GMO corn. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Sure, here's an image prompt that might lead to an interesting visual: Prompt: [ inspired by bauhaus ] Generate an image of a futuristic Kansas cornfield where oversized maize towers over a row of sleek Hollister retail stores. Fashion-forward individuals, reflecting the influence of the colossal corn, browse through racks of trendy clothing amidst the bustling scene. This prompt should encourage the AI to create a visually striking and imaginative representation of the scene you've described, drawing on the style of bauhaus to enhance the aesthetic appeal.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in Kansas caused Hollister retail store count worldwide to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
From Cornfields to Catwalks: The GMO-Cein Oui-dence of Corn and Couture

Journal of Biofashion and Agricultural Innovation

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9818423 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"From Cornfields to Catwalks: The GMO-Cein Oui-dence of Corn and Couture"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Kansas and the number of Hollister retail stores worldwide has long been a topic of speculation and amusement. In this study, we set out to peel back the layers of this perplexing connection, delving into the potential implications on both crop cultivation and retail expansion. By harvesting data from the USDA and Statista, we unearthed a ripe correlation coefficient of 0.9818423 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022. Our findings not only lend support to the notion that there exists a robust link between GMO corn and the proliferation of cool, beach-themed clothing stores, but also - quite literally - illustrate the "corn-nection" between agriculture and fashion. This research has significant implications for those in the farming and retail sectors, and may just shed some "ear-resistible" light on the ever-evolving dynamics of our modern world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Cornfields to Catwalks: The GMO-Cein Oui-dence of Corn and Couture"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Kansas and the number of Hollister retail stores worldwide has long been a topic of speculation and amusement. In this study, we set out to peel back the layers of this perplexing connection, delving into the potential implications on both crop cultivation and retail expansion. By harvesting data from the USDA and Statista, we unearthed a ripe correlation coefficient of 0.9818423 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022. Our findings not only lend support to the notion that there exists a robust link between GMO corn and the proliferation of cool, beach-themed clothing stores, but also - quite literally - illustrate the "corn-nection" between agriculture and fashion. This research has significant implications for those in the farming and retail sectors, and may just shed some "ear-resistible" light on the ever-evolving dynamics of our modern world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of agriculture and fashion may seem like an unlikely pair, akin to pairing avocados with ice cream or plaid with polka dots, but as our research endeavors to reveal, the "corn-nection" between GMO-corn cultivation in Kansas and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide is no mere whimsical fancy, but a statistically sound phenomenon worthy of investigation. While the debate over the use of GMOs in crop production and the ramifications on the environment and food supply is as contentious as debating whether pineapple truly belongs on pizza, the potential impact on the retail sector has been largely overlooked. Our study dives into this uncharted territory and seeks to uncover the underlying factors driving the correlation between these seemingly unrelated domains.

The popularity of Hollister as a purveyor of "California vibes" and the omnipresence of genetically modified corn in the heartland of the United States may appear to share only a kernel of a connection at first glance. However, as we will demonstrate through rigorous data analysis and statistical modeling, the correlation between the two is not a mere cob-incidence, but rather a symbiotic relationship with provocative implications for both the agricultural and retail industries. Our findings could disrupt the current narrative surrounding the proliferation of trendy clothing brands and the agricultural practices that underpin them, fundamentally altering our understanding of the cornucopia of factors driving retail expansion.

As we embark on this journey through the entangled vines of GMO corn and global retail presence, it is worth acknowledging the potential ramifications of our findings. With the field of genetically modified organisms being as polarizing as debates about the dominance of "dad bods" in fashion, our research aims not to take sides, but rather to lay bare the patterns hidden within the abundance of data, shedding light on the complex interplay between agricultural innovation and fashion trends. In doing so, we hope to provide a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate industries and to spark conversations that reach beyond the traditional silos of academic inquiry.

With that cornsideration in mind, let us delve into the deeply rooted relationship between GMO corn and couture, unraveling the threads that bind these fields together and sifting through the kernels of truth that may just redefine the fabric of our understanding.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Cornfields to Catwalks: The GMO-Cein Oui-dence of Corn and Couture"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Kansas and the number of Hollister retail stores worldwide has long been a topic of speculation and amusement. In this study, we set out to peel back the layers of this perplexing connection, delving into the potential implications on both crop cultivation and retail expansion. By harvesting data from the USDA and Statista, we unearthed a ripe correlation coefficient of 0.9818423 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022. Our findings not only lend support to the notion that there exists a robust link between GMO corn and the proliferation of cool, beach-themed clothing stores, but also - quite literally - illustrate the "corn-nection" between agriculture and fashion. This research has significant implications for those in the farming and retail sectors, and may just shed some "ear-resistible" light on the ever-evolving dynamics of our modern world.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of agriculture and fashion may seem like an unlikely pair, akin to pairing avocados with ice cream or plaid with polka dots, but as our research endeavors to reveal, the "corn-nection" between GMO-corn cultivation in Kansas and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide is no mere whimsical fancy, but a statistically sound phenomenon worthy of investigation. While the debate over the use of GMOs in crop production and the ramifications on the environment and food supply is as contentious as debating whether pineapple truly belongs on pizza, the potential impact on the retail sector has been largely overlooked. Our study dives into this uncharted territory and seeks to uncover the underlying factors driving the correlation between these seemingly unrelated domains.
The popularity of Hollister as a purveyor of "California vibes" and the omnipresence of genetically modified corn in the heartland of the United States may appear to share only a kernel of a connection at first glance. However, as we will demonstrate through rigorous data analysis and statistical modeling, the correlation between the two is not a mere cob-incidence, but rather a symbiotic relationship with provocative implications for both the agricultural and retail industries. Our findings could disrupt the current narrative surrounding the proliferation of trendy clothing brands and the agricultural practices that underpin them, fundamentally altering our understanding of the cornucopia of factors driving retail expansion.
As we embark on this journey through the entangled vines of GMO corn and global retail presence, it is worth acknowledging the potential ramifications of our findings. With the field of genetically modified organisms being as polarizing as debates about the dominance of "dad bods" in fashion, our research aims not to take sides, but rather to lay bare the patterns hidden within the abundance of data, shedding light on the complex interplay between agricultural innovation and fashion trends. In doing so, we hope to provide a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate industries and to spark conversations that reach beyond the traditional silos of academic inquiry.
With that cornsideration in mind, let us delve into the deeply rooted relationship between GMO corn and couture, unraveling the threads that bind these fields together and sifting through the kernels of truth that may just redefine the fabric of our understanding.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The scholarly exploration of the GMO corn-Hollister nexus commences with the foundational work of Smith et al. in "Agricultural Anomalies: Unearthing Unlikely Connections," where the authors find an unexpected correlation between crop biotechnology and the expansion of trendy retail outlets. Building on this groundbreaking investigation, Doe's "Economic Growth and Retail Resurgence: Deciphering Unlikely Relationships" delves deeper into the nuanced dynamics of agricultural innovation and commercial proliferation, shedding light on the concealed ties between cornfields and catwalks.

Venturing beyond the academic realm, real-world explorations in non-fiction literature, such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "Fast Food Nation" by Eric Schlosser, unearth the complex interplay of food production, consumer culture, and the emergence of fashion trends. These seminal works set the stage for our foray into the whimsically perplexing world of GMO corn and couture, setting the scene for a tale as riveting as a thriller novel, or perhaps even a comedy of errors.

Transitioning from the land of reality to the realm of fiction, novels like "The Corn Whisperer" by Jennifer Smith and "Fashionably Genetically Modified" by Alice Doe playfully toy with the idea of improbable connections, offering speculative narratives that blur the lines between agricultural science and high fashion. As we glean insights from these imaginative works, it becomes apparent that the intersection of genetically modified corn and retail expansion is no trivial matter, but a fertile ground for infusing academic discourse with a generous sprinkle of levity.

In a turn perhaps unforeseen in a scholarly exploration, the quirky world of cartoons and children's shows reveals unexpected parallels to our research quest. Watching episodes of "VeggieTales" and "The Magic School Bus" provides a whimsical lens through which to view the intricate web of connections between agricultural practices and retail trends, underscoring the surreal nature of the GMO corn-Hollister correlation. As we unpeel each layer of this convoluted relationship, it becomes increasingly clear that the line between serious academic inquiry and uproarious revelry may be as thin as the skin of a kernel of corn.

In the next section, we will harvest insights from empirical studies to shed light on the bountiful "ear-resistible" evidence supporting the GMO-Cein Oui-dence of Corn and Couture.

[Note: The author takes creative liberties and invents the sources, including books and films, in a manner that engages the reader with humorous and amusing references while adhering to the request of integrating them within the theoretical literature review. This approach uses playful and lighthearted language to enrich the academic grounding with a humorous twist.]


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista . You used data from 2000 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Cornfields to Catwalks: The GMO-Cein Oui-dence of Corn and Couture"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Kansas and the number of Hollister retail stores worldwide has long been a topic of speculation and amusement. In this study, we set out to peel back the layers of this perplexing connection, delving into the potential implications on both crop cultivation and retail expansion. By harvesting data from the USDA and Statista, we unearthed a ripe correlation coefficient of 0.9818423 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022. Our findings not only lend support to the notion that there exists a robust link between GMO corn and the proliferation of cool, beach-themed clothing stores, but also - quite literally - illustrate the "corn-nection" between agriculture and fashion. This research has significant implications for those in the farming and retail sectors, and may just shed some "ear-resistible" light on the ever-evolving dynamics of our modern world.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of agriculture and fashion may seem like an unlikely pair, akin to pairing avocados with ice cream or plaid with polka dots, but as our research endeavors to reveal, the "corn-nection" between GMO-corn cultivation in Kansas and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide is no mere whimsical fancy, but a statistically sound phenomenon worthy of investigation. While the debate over the use of GMOs in crop production and the ramifications on the environment and food supply is as contentious as debating whether pineapple truly belongs on pizza, the potential impact on the retail sector has been largely overlooked. Our study dives into this uncharted territory and seeks to uncover the underlying factors driving the correlation between these seemingly unrelated domains.
The popularity of Hollister as a purveyor of "California vibes" and the omnipresence of genetically modified corn in the heartland of the United States may appear to share only a kernel of a connection at first glance. However, as we will demonstrate through rigorous data analysis and statistical modeling, the correlation between the two is not a mere cob-incidence, but rather a symbiotic relationship with provocative implications for both the agricultural and retail industries. Our findings could disrupt the current narrative surrounding the proliferation of trendy clothing brands and the agricultural practices that underpin them, fundamentally altering our understanding of the cornucopia of factors driving retail expansion.
As we embark on this journey through the entangled vines of GMO corn and global retail presence, it is worth acknowledging the potential ramifications of our findings. With the field of genetically modified organisms being as polarizing as debates about the dominance of "dad bods" in fashion, our research aims not to take sides, but rather to lay bare the patterns hidden within the abundance of data, shedding light on the complex interplay between agricultural innovation and fashion trends. In doing so, we hope to provide a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate industries and to spark conversations that reach beyond the traditional silos of academic inquiry.
With that cornsideration in mind, let us delve into the deeply rooted relationship between GMO corn and couture, unraveling the threads that bind these fields together and sifting through the kernels of truth that may just redefine the fabric of our understanding.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To peel back the layers of this tangled maize, our research team employed a combination of quantitative analysis, data visualization, and a few well-placed corny jokes to investigate the correlation between GMO corn production in Kansas and the global proliferation of Hollister retail stores. Our data collection process involved harvesting information from a variety of sources, with a particular focus on the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista.

First, we gathered data on the production of GMO corn in Kansas from the USDA over the period from 2000 to 2022. This involved sifting through a veritable field of numerical data, much like separating kernels from the cob, to obtain a comprehensive picture of corn cultivation practices in the Sunflower State. To ensure the accuracy and reliability of the data, we meticulously cross-referenced multiple datasets and dug deep, husking through layers of information to extract the most kernel of truth.

In parallel, our research team scoured the annals of online resources and databases to collect data on the global distribution of Hollister retail stores during the same timeframe. This task was akin to combing through a vast, fashion-forward corn maze, navigating the twists and turns of retail industry data to map out the presence of the surf-inspired brand across the world. Through this process, we navigated the digital fields of varied sources, weaving together disparate pieces of information like threads in a complex tapestry.

Having harvested the requisite data, we then conducted a robust statistical analysis to examine the relationship between GMO corn production and Hollister store count. Utilizing advanced statistical modeling and correlation coefficients, we ventured into the statistical cornfield, aiming to unearth any significant patterns and potential correlations amidst the sea of data. Our analysis was as thorough as a farmer inspecting every cob in a harvest, ensuring that no kernel of information was overlooked.

Following this analysis, we were able to uncover a ripe correlation coefficient of 0.9818423 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01. These findings, much like a well-pollinated maize field, indicate a strong relationship between the cultivation of GMO corn in Kansas and the global proliferation of Hollister retail stores.

In essence, our methodology involved a systematic and meticulous approach to gather, analyze, and interpret data, drawing upon the rich resources available in the digital age, and quite literally getting to the "root" of the matter. Our research process was not without its challenges, but we husked through the thorny issues and emerged with findings that shed light on the "ear-resistible" connection between agriculture and fashion, kernels of knowledge that may just redefine the fabric of our understanding.

With the methodological framework firmly in place, we turned our attention to the analysis of these intriguing findings, seeking to unravel the tendrils of causation and correlation that bind GMO corn and couture in this entangled web of data.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista .

For the time period 2000 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9818423, r-squared of 0.9640143, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Cornfields to Catwalks: The GMO-Cein Oui-dence of Corn and Couture"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Kansas and the number of Hollister retail stores worldwide has long been a topic of speculation and amusement. In this study, we set out to peel back the layers of this perplexing connection, delving into the potential implications on both crop cultivation and retail expansion. By harvesting data from the USDA and Statista, we unearthed a ripe correlation coefficient of 0.9818423 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022. Our findings not only lend support to the notion that there exists a robust link between GMO corn and the proliferation of cool, beach-themed clothing stores, but also - quite literally - illustrate the "corn-nection" between agriculture and fashion. This research has significant implications for those in the farming and retail sectors, and may just shed some "ear-resistible" light on the ever-evolving dynamics of our modern world.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of agriculture and fashion may seem like an unlikely pair, akin to pairing avocados with ice cream or plaid with polka dots, but as our research endeavors to reveal, the "corn-nection" between GMO-corn cultivation in Kansas and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide is no mere whimsical fancy, but a statistically sound phenomenon worthy of investigation. While the debate over the use of GMOs in crop production and the ramifications on the environment and food supply is as contentious as debating whether pineapple truly belongs on pizza, the potential impact on the retail sector has been largely overlooked. Our study dives into this uncharted territory and seeks to uncover the underlying factors driving the correlation between these seemingly unrelated domains.
The popularity of Hollister as a purveyor of "California vibes" and the omnipresence of genetically modified corn in the heartland of the United States may appear to share only a kernel of a connection at first glance. However, as we will demonstrate through rigorous data analysis and statistical modeling, the correlation between the two is not a mere cob-incidence, but rather a symbiotic relationship with provocative implications for both the agricultural and retail industries. Our findings could disrupt the current narrative surrounding the proliferation of trendy clothing brands and the agricultural practices that underpin them, fundamentally altering our understanding of the cornucopia of factors driving retail expansion.
As we embark on this journey through the entangled vines of GMO corn and global retail presence, it is worth acknowledging the potential ramifications of our findings. With the field of genetically modified organisms being as polarizing as debates about the dominance of "dad bods" in fashion, our research aims not to take sides, but rather to lay bare the patterns hidden within the abundance of data, shedding light on the complex interplay between agricultural innovation and fashion trends. In doing so, we hope to provide a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate industries and to spark conversations that reach beyond the traditional silos of academic inquiry.
With that cornsideration in mind, let us delve into the deeply rooted relationship between GMO corn and couture, unraveling the threads that bind these fields together and sifting through the kernels of truth that may just redefine the fabric of our understanding.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from the USDA and Statista revealed a strikingly robust correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivated in Kansas and the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores. From the years 2000 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9818423, indicating a strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. With an r-squared value of 0.9640143, it is evident that approximately 96.4% of the variation in Hollister store count can be explained by the variation in the use of GMOs in Kansas corn. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 suggests that this relationship is statistically significant, standing firm against the skeptically raised eyebrows of the scientific community.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) illustrates the striking correlation between the number of Hollister retail stores worldwide and the utilization of GMOs in corn grown in the heartland of America. It seems that as the GMO-corn production in Kansas has flourished, so has the presence of Hollister stores across the globe. This correlation, while unexpected, is as clear as the blue skies of the Californian coast that Hollister's branding seeks to evoke.

In light of these findings, it is not only noteworthy to acknowledge the statistically significant connection between GMO-corn cultivation and the proliferation of retail outlets, but also to recognize the potential impact on the popular culture of fashion and the agricultural industry. As we peel back the layers of this perplexing connection, it becomes increasingly apparent that the affinity for genetically modified corn and trendy beachwear is more than just a passing "fashion faux pas"; rather, it is a bonafide phenomenon with fittingly "ear-resistible" implications for the fields of agriculture and retail.

These findings prompt further inquiries, challenging us to reconsider the manner in which we perceive the influences shaping retail expansion and the cultivation of crops. Whether this correlation arises from a shared affinity for waves of alteration or a genuine bond akin to that of peas and carrots, the implications are as significant as stumbling upon well-hidden treasure in a cornfield. This research not only unveils the remarkably strong "corn-nection" between the cultivation of GMO corn and the proliferation of trendy retail stores but also shines a spotlight on the ever-evolving dynamics of our interconnected modern world.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"From Cornfields to Catwalks: The GMO-Cein Oui-dence of Corn and Couture"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Kansas and the number of Hollister retail stores worldwide has long been a topic of speculation and amusement. In this study, we set out to peel back the layers of this perplexing connection, delving into the potential implications on both crop cultivation and retail expansion. By harvesting data from the USDA and Statista, we unearthed a ripe correlation coefficient of 0.9818423 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022. Our findings not only lend support to the notion that there exists a robust link between GMO corn and the proliferation of cool, beach-themed clothing stores, but also - quite literally - illustrate the "corn-nection" between agriculture and fashion. This research has significant implications for those in the farming and retail sectors, and may just shed some "ear-resistible" light on the ever-evolving dynamics of our modern world.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The scholarly exploration of the GMO corn-Hollister nexus commences with the foundational work of Smith et al. in "Agricultural Anomalies: Unearthing Unlikely Connections," where the authors find an unexpected correlation between crop biotechnology and the expansion of trendy retail outlets. Building on this groundbreaking investigation, Doe's "Economic Growth and Retail Resurgence: Deciphering Unlikely Relationships" delves deeper into the nuanced dynamics of agricultural innovation and commercial proliferation, shedding light on the concealed ties between cornfields and catwalks.
Venturing beyond the academic realm, real-world explorations in non-fiction literature, such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "Fast Food Nation" by Eric Schlosser, unearth the complex interplay of food production, consumer culture, and the emergence of fashion trends. These seminal works set the stage for our foray into the whimsically perplexing world of GMO corn and couture, setting the scene for a tale as riveting as a thriller novel, or perhaps even a comedy of errors.
Transitioning from the land of reality to the realm of fiction, novels like "The Corn Whisperer" by Jennifer Smith and "Fashionably Genetically Modified" by Alice Doe playfully toy with the idea of improbable connections, offering speculative narratives that blur the lines between agricultural science and high fashion. As we glean insights from these imaginative works, it becomes apparent that the intersection of genetically modified corn and retail expansion is no trivial matter, but a fertile ground for infusing academic discourse with a generous sprinkle of levity.
In a turn perhaps unforeseen in a scholarly exploration, the quirky world of cartoons and children's shows reveals unexpected parallels to our research quest. Watching episodes of "VeggieTales" and "The Magic School Bus" provides a whimsical lens through which to view the intricate web of connections between agricultural practices and retail trends, underscoring the surreal nature of the GMO corn-Hollister correlation. As we unpeel each layer of this convoluted relationship, it becomes increasingly clear that the line between serious academic inquiry and uproarious revelry may be as thin as the skin of a kernel of corn.
In the next section, we will harvest insights from empirical studies to shed light on the bountiful "ear-resistible" evidence supporting the GMO-Cein Oui-dence of Corn and Couture.
[Note: The author takes creative liberties and invents the sources, including books and films, in a manner that engages the reader with humorous and amusing references while adhering to the request of integrating them within the theoretical literature review. This approach uses playful and lighthearted language to enrich the academic grounding with a humorous twist.]

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the USDA and Statista revealed a strikingly robust correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivated in Kansas and the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores. From the years 2000 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9818423, indicating a strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. With an r-squared value of 0.9640143, it is evident that approximately 96.4% of the variation in Hollister store count can be explained by the variation in the use of GMOs in Kansas corn. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 suggests that this relationship is statistically significant, standing firm against the skeptically raised eyebrows of the scientific community.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) illustrates the striking correlation between the number of Hollister retail stores worldwide and the utilization of GMOs in corn grown in the heartland of America. It seems that as the GMO-corn production in Kansas has flourished, so has the presence of Hollister stores across the globe. This correlation, while unexpected, is as clear as the blue skies of the Californian coast that Hollister's branding seeks to evoke.
In light of these findings, it is not only noteworthy to acknowledge the statistically significant connection between GMO-corn cultivation and the proliferation of retail outlets, but also to recognize the potential impact on the popular culture of fashion and the agricultural industry. As we peel back the layers of this perplexing connection, it becomes increasingly apparent that the affinity for genetically modified corn and trendy beachwear is more than just a passing "fashion faux pas"; rather, it is a bonafide phenomenon with fittingly "ear-resistible" implications for the fields of agriculture and retail.
These findings prompt further inquiries, challenging us to reconsider the manner in which we perceive the influences shaping retail expansion and the cultivation of crops. Whether this correlation arises from a shared affinity for waves of alteration or a genuine bond akin to that of peas and carrots, the implications are as significant as stumbling upon well-hidden treasure in a cornfield. This research not only unveils the remarkably strong "corn-nection" between the cultivation of GMO corn and the proliferation of trendy retail stores but also shines a spotlight on the ever-evolving dynamics of our interconnected modern world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

The findings of our study provide compelling evidence of a substantial and statistically significant correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivated in Kansas and the global count of Hollister retail stores. Our results not only confirm, but "kern-firm" the earlier speculations made by scholars and fictional authors alike regarding the enigmatic link between agriculture and fashion. For instance, Smith et al.'s "Agricultural Anomalies" and Doe's "Economic Growth and Retail Resurgence" laid the groundwork for our investigation and, in hindsight, their seemingly whimsical assertions now stand as remarkably prescient insights into the intertwining realms of cornfields and couture.

As per our results, the nearly "cob-surd" correlation coefficient of 0.9818423 and a p-value of less than 0.01 endorse the robustness of the association. The statistical significance of our findings is not something to "starch" aside, as it anchors the broader debate on GMO-driven agricultural practices and their far-reaching impact on consumer culture and retail expansion. Our research, much like the playful narratives offered by Jennifer Smith and Alice Doe, illuminates that the GMO corn-Hollister connection is more than just a figment of our humorous imagination; it stands as a "pop-corny" reality with implications that extend far beyond the perimeters of a cornfield and into the world of fashion.

It is essential to note that our study does not merely entertain the notion of an unlikely relationship; rather, it provides "kern-tinuity" to the narrative laid out by Pollan and Schlosser, demonstrating that the fusion of agricultural practices with consumer trends is not merely a frivolous dalliance but a statement worthy of scholarly consideration. The findings pose an intriguing proposition, inviting us to "stalk" the fields of GMO corn and fashion retail trends in search of deeper understanding and potential practical applications.

Moreover, our findings also allude to the narrative extolled by children's shows such as "VeggieTales" and "The Magic School Bus," showcasing the thin, albeit perceptible, line between the humorous and the scholarly. The "ear-resistible" evidence supports the whimsical notion that a correlation, albeit unexpected, exists between GMO corn and retail expansion, underscoring the surreal nature of this "corn-nection." This unlikely pairing, much like the unexpected cohabitation of peas and carrots, beckons further exploration – not only for its academic value but also for the potential practical implications it bears.

Thus, the "earresistible" evidence brought forth through our research leaves us with a "stalkingly" convincing argument that the GMO-cein Oui-dence of Corn and Couture is not to be dismissed as mere fanciful conjecture. We believe that our findings serve as fertile ground for the future scholarship, challenging researchers to "ear-mark" this unlikely relationship for further examination and following in the footsteps of rigorous inquiry that seeks to uncover the deeper, yet unexplored layers of this intriguing "ear-ticulation" between corn cultivation and global fashion trends.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Kansas and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"From Cornfields to Catwalks: The GMO-Cein Oui-dence of Corn and Couture"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Kansas and the number of Hollister retail stores worldwide has long been a topic of speculation and amusement. In this study, we set out to peel back the layers of this perplexing connection, delving into the potential implications on both crop cultivation and retail expansion. By harvesting data from the USDA and Statista, we unearthed a ripe correlation coefficient of 0.9818423 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022. Our findings not only lend support to the notion that there exists a robust link between GMO corn and the proliferation of cool, beach-themed clothing stores, but also - quite literally - illustrate the "corn-nection" between agriculture and fashion. This research has significant implications for those in the farming and retail sectors, and may just shed some "ear-resistible" light on the ever-evolving dynamics of our modern world.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of agriculture and fashion may seem like an unlikely pair, akin to pairing avocados with ice cream or plaid with polka dots, but as our research endeavors to reveal, the "corn-nection" between GMO-corn cultivation in Kansas and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide is no mere whimsical fancy, but a statistically sound phenomenon worthy of investigation. While the debate over the use of GMOs in crop production and the ramifications on the environment and food supply is as contentious as debating whether pineapple truly belongs on pizza, the potential impact on the retail sector has been largely overlooked. Our study dives into this uncharted territory and seeks to uncover the underlying factors driving the correlation between these seemingly unrelated domains.
The popularity of Hollister as a purveyor of "California vibes" and the omnipresence of genetically modified corn in the heartland of the United States may appear to share only a kernel of a connection at first glance. However, as we will demonstrate through rigorous data analysis and statistical modeling, the correlation between the two is not a mere cob-incidence, but rather a symbiotic relationship with provocative implications for both the agricultural and retail industries. Our findings could disrupt the current narrative surrounding the proliferation of trendy clothing brands and the agricultural practices that underpin them, fundamentally altering our understanding of the cornucopia of factors driving retail expansion.
As we embark on this journey through the entangled vines of GMO corn and global retail presence, it is worth acknowledging the potential ramifications of our findings. With the field of genetically modified organisms being as polarizing as debates about the dominance of "dad bods" in fashion, our research aims not to take sides, but rather to lay bare the patterns hidden within the abundance of data, shedding light on the complex interplay between agricultural innovation and fashion trends. In doing so, we hope to provide a deeper understanding of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate industries and to spark conversations that reach beyond the traditional silos of academic inquiry.
With that cornsideration in mind, let us delve into the deeply rooted relationship between GMO corn and couture, unraveling the threads that bind these fields together and sifting through the kernels of truth that may just redefine the fabric of our understanding.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the USDA and Statista revealed a strikingly robust correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivated in Kansas and the worldwide count of Hollister retail stores. From the years 2000 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9818423, indicating a strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. With an r-squared value of 0.9640143, it is evident that approximately 96.4% of the variation in Hollister store count can be explained by the variation in the use of GMOs in Kansas corn. Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 suggests that this relationship is statistically significant, standing firm against the skeptically raised eyebrows of the scientific community.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) illustrates the striking correlation between the number of Hollister retail stores worldwide and the utilization of GMOs in corn grown in the heartland of America. It seems that as the GMO-corn production in Kansas has flourished, so has the presence of Hollister stores across the globe. This correlation, while unexpected, is as clear as the blue skies of the Californian coast that Hollister's branding seeks to evoke.
In light of these findings, it is not only noteworthy to acknowledge the statistically significant connection between GMO-corn cultivation and the proliferation of retail outlets, but also to recognize the potential impact on the popular culture of fashion and the agricultural industry. As we peel back the layers of this perplexing connection, it becomes increasingly apparent that the affinity for genetically modified corn and trendy beachwear is more than just a passing "fashion faux pas"; rather, it is a bonafide phenomenon with fittingly "ear-resistible" implications for the fields of agriculture and retail.
These findings prompt further inquiries, challenging us to reconsider the manner in which we perceive the influences shaping retail expansion and the cultivation of crops. Whether this correlation arises from a shared affinity for waves of alteration or a genuine bond akin to that of peas and carrots, the implications are as significant as stumbling upon well-hidden treasure in a cornfield. This research not only unveils the remarkably strong "corn-nection" between the cultivation of GMO corn and the proliferation of trendy retail stores but also shines a spotlight on the ever-evolving dynamics of our interconnected modern world.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has uncovered a striking correlation between the use of GMOs in corn cultivated in Kansas and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. The statistically significant relationship, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9818423, demonstrates that as GMO-corn production in Kansas has flourished, so has the presence of Hollister stores across the globe. It's as if the corn took a "stalk" in the fashion world! The implications of this research are far-reaching, echoing through the fields of agriculture and retail like a whispering wind through a cornfield.

We hope this study has shed some "ear-resistible" light on the subtle and unexpected interplay between seemingly disparate industries. While the "corn-nection" between GMO corn and couture may sound like a comical concept, our findings highlight the need to rethink how we perceive the influences shaping retail expansion and crop cultivation. It's like finding a needle in a haystack, except the needle is fashionable beachwear, and the haystack is a field of genetically modified corn!

Having unveiled this robust and statistically significant connection between corn and couture, it is clear that further research in this area may be as unnecessary as a beach umbrella in a cornfield. Our results serve as a veritable corncert, removing any "kernel" of doubt about the substantial link between GMO corn and the proliferation of trendy retail stores. As we wrap up, we assert that this "corn-nection" has been buttered and thoroughly popped, leaving no question that the link between GMO corn and fashion is no mere cob-incidence. It's a-maize-ing!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Cornfields to Catwalks: The GMO-Cein Oui-dence of Corn and Couture. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Biofashion and Agricultural Innovation


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Cornfields to Catwalks: The GMO-Cein Oui-dence of Corn and Couture. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Agricultural Fashion Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Cornfields to Catwalks: The GMO-Cein Oui-dence of Corn and Couture with an abstract of The relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMO) in corn grown in Kansas and the number of Hollister retail stores worldwide has long been a topic of speculation and amusement. In this study, we set out to peel back the layers of this perplexing connection, delving into the potential implications on both crop cultivation and retail expansion. By harvesting data from the USDA and Statista, we unearthed a ripe correlation coefficient of 0.9818423 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the years 2000 to 2022. Our findings not only lend support to the notion that there exists a robust link between GMO corn and the proliferation of cool, beach-themed clothing stores, but also - quite literally - illustrate the "corn-nection" between agriculture and fashion. This research has significant implications for those in the farming and retail sectors, and may just shed some "ear-resistible" light on the ever-evolving dynamics of our modern world.

ChatGPT:

GMO corn, Kansas, retail expansion, Hollister, corn cultivation, correlation coefficient, USDA data, Statista, fashion retail, agriculture, genetically modified organisms, crop yield, GMO impact

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Kansas
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Kansas that is genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Kansas

Hollister retail store count worldwide
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Hollister retail store count worldwide

Correlation r = 0.9818423 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9640143 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 96.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hollister retail store count worldwide) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Kansas) over the 23 years from 2000 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.21E-16. 0.0000000000000001208605857627
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 1.21E-14% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 8,273,995,973,868,761 random variables You don't actually need 8 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.96, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in corn grown in Kansas (GMO corn %)3338434754636882909190929091959595959695969394
Hollister retail store count worldwide (Store count)53288167249309383447510525540571589587568553543538542546497505529




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([33,38,43,47,54,63,68,82,90,91,90,92,90,91,95,95,95,95,96,95,96,93,94,])
array_2 = np.array([5,32,88,167,249,309,383,447,510,525,540,571,589,587,568,553,543,538,542,546,497,505,529,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Kansas"
array_2_name = "Hollister retail store count worldwide"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 3243 · Black Variable ID: 756 · Red Variable ID: 176
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0