about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,242 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Number of games won by Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and the second variable is The number of database administrators in California.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the Miami Marlins continued to struggle on the field, their poor performance began to affect the morale of database administrators in California. With each loss, the Marlins inadvertently sent a wave of disappointment across the country, leading to a decrease in productivity among the database administrators. It's as if the Marlins' inability to secure victories somehow impacted the database administrators' ability to 'win' in their own professional league. As the Marlins' wins dwindled, so did the motivation of the database administrators in the golden state, ultimately leading to a decrease in their numbers. It's a bizarre case of sports outcomes having a ripple effect on an entirely unrelated industry, but it just goes to show that in the interconnected web of causation, even the seemingly unrelated can end up striking out. The Marlins' slump wasn't just a game-changer on the baseball diamond; it turned out to be a data-changer in the tech world as well, leaving everyone to wonder: who knew that the fate of database administrators in California could be swayed by the performance of a baseball team all the way in Miami?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that looks like a scene from 'Star Wars' and depicts a group of individuals wearing Miami Marlins jerseys in a stadium, exuberantly cheering as the team wins a crucial game. In the background, showcase a diminishing number of database administrators from California joining successful and victorious organizations. Capture the bittersweet feeling of transition and success amidst the jubilant celebration. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Number of games won by Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and The number of database administrators in California. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Sci-fi fantacy Art nouveau An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Whimsical illustration a funny image you would see on reddit
ChatGPT: an image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Number of games won by Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and The number of database administrators in California, in the following situation: Because as the Miami Marlins kept losing, the morale of database administrators in California waned, leading them to seek new, more victorious career paths - like becoming professional athletes or joining winning teams as data analysts.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A despondent group of former database administrators from California are seen donning Miami Marlins jerseys, cheering on the team as they win a crucial game. Amidst the joyous celebrations, the news breaks that the number of database administrators in California has significantly decreased, as many have transitioned into careers within winning teams and successful organizations.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ an image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' ] and depicting this scene: A despondent group of former database administrators from California are seen donning Miami Marlins jerseys, cheering on the team as they win a crucial game. Amidst the joyous celebrations, the news breaks that the number of database administrators in California has significantly decreased, as many have transitioned into careers within winning teams and successful organizations. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that looks like a scene from 'Star Wars' and depicts a group of individuals wearing Miami Marlins jerseys in a stadium, exuberantly cheering as the team wins a crucial game. In the background, showcase a diminishing number of database administrators from California joining successful and victorious organizations. Capture the bittersweet feeling of transition and success amidst the jubilant celebration.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Number of games won by Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) caused The number of database administrators in California to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Swinging for the Fences: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Miami Marlins' Game Wins and California's Database Administrators

The Journal of Sports Analytics and Techonomics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of games won by Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and The number of database administrators in California. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Baseball Reference and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8512660 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Swinging for the Fences: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Miami Marlins' Game Wins and California's Database Administrators

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical yet informative study that delves into the seemingly bizarre correlation between the number of games won by the Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and the quantity of database administrators in the golden state of California. Our research team combed through data from Baseball Reference and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to address this quirky inquiry. We uncover a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8512660 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2020.

Our analysis goes beyond the diamond to reveal an unexpected tie between the success of the Miami Marlins and the abundance of database administrators in the tech hub of California. It's as if these two seemingly unrelated entities are playing a game of "catch" when it comes to their numbers. Just when you think you've covered all the bases, this data playfully reminds us of the whimsical connections that can emerge in the world of statistics.

As we unravel this quirky association, we also weave in the occasional dad joke for good measure. Because after all, what is statistics without a little humor? So, whether you're a fan of baseball or bytes, join us as we explore the correlation between wins on the field and wins in the database world - and try not to strike out on the fun along the way!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of games won by Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and The number of database administrators in California. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Swinging for the Fences: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Miami Marlins' Game Wins and California's Database Administrators

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical yet informative study that delves into the seemingly bizarre correlation between the number of games won by the Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and the quantity of database administrators in the golden state of California. Our research team combed through data from Baseball Reference and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to address this quirky inquiry. We uncover a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8512660 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2020.

Our analysis goes beyond the diamond to reveal an unexpected tie between the success of the Miami Marlins and the abundance of database administrators in the tech hub of California. It's as if these two seemingly unrelated entities are playing a game of "catch" when it comes to their numbers. Just when you think you've covered all the bases, this data playfully reminds us of the whimsical connections that can emerge in the world of statistics.

As we unravel this quirky association, we also weave in the occasional dad joke for good measure. Because after all, what is statistics without a little humor? So, whether you're a fan of baseball or bytes, join us as we explore the correlation between wins on the field and wins in the database world - and try not to strike out on the fun along the way!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

A famous philosopher, Yogi Berra, once mused, "Baseball is 90% mental and the other half is physical." In the same vein, as we embark on our statistical journey, we are reminded that data analysis is 110% objective and the other half is a pinch of humor. It's with this philosophy in mind that we approach the unexpected correlation between the Miami Marlins' game wins and the number of database administrators in California; a correlation that has left statisticians scratching their heads and tossing around more than just baseballs.

In the quest to peel back the layers of this statistical onion, we find ourselves pondering the age-old debate: is it merely a coincidence that both the success of a baseball team and the demand for tech-savvy professionals are on the rise? Or perhaps, there exists a deeper cosmic connection that even the most astute researcher might overlook. One thing is for certain, this study is anything but a wild pitch; it aims to bridge the gap between statistical analysis and a good chuckle.

Much like the art of data analysis, baseball requires a keen eye and a strategic approach. Just as a batter scours the opposition's pitch for patterns and weaknesses, we have combed through years of game wins by the Miami Marlins and the count of database administrators in California to uncover a correlation coefficient that is anything but a curveball. The unexpected nature of our findings only adds to the grandeur and mystery of statistical inquiry.

So, as we delve into the interconnected worlds of baseball and database administration, we invite you to join us in rediscovering the playful side of statistics and the surprises that lie beyond the box scores and spreadsheets. After all, even the most "serious" of correlations can't resist a good dad joke every now and then.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of games won by Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and The number of database administrators in California. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Swinging for the Fences: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Miami Marlins' Game Wins and California's Database Administrators

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical yet informative study that delves into the seemingly bizarre correlation between the number of games won by the Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and the quantity of database administrators in the golden state of California. Our research team combed through data from Baseball Reference and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to address this quirky inquiry. We uncover a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8512660 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2020.

Our analysis goes beyond the diamond to reveal an unexpected tie between the success of the Miami Marlins and the abundance of database administrators in the tech hub of California. It's as if these two seemingly unrelated entities are playing a game of "catch" when it comes to their numbers. Just when you think you've covered all the bases, this data playfully reminds us of the whimsical connections that can emerge in the world of statistics.

As we unravel this quirky association, we also weave in the occasional dad joke for good measure. Because after all, what is statistics without a little humor? So, whether you're a fan of baseball or bytes, join us as we explore the correlation between wins on the field and wins in the database world - and try not to strike out on the fun along the way!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
A famous philosopher, Yogi Berra, once mused, "Baseball is 90% mental and the other half is physical." In the same vein, as we embark on our statistical journey, we are reminded that data analysis is 110% objective and the other half is a pinch of humor. It's with this philosophy in mind that we approach the unexpected correlation between the Miami Marlins' game wins and the number of database administrators in California; a correlation that has left statisticians scratching their heads and tossing around more than just baseballs.
In the quest to peel back the layers of this statistical onion, we find ourselves pondering the age-old debate: is it merely a coincidence that both the success of a baseball team and the demand for tech-savvy professionals are on the rise? Or perhaps, there exists a deeper cosmic connection that even the most astute researcher might overlook. One thing is for certain, this study is anything but a wild pitch; it aims to bridge the gap between statistical analysis and a good chuckle.
Much like the art of data analysis, baseball requires a keen eye and a strategic approach. Just as a batter scours the opposition's pitch for patterns and weaknesses, we have combed through years of game wins by the Miami Marlins and the count of database administrators in California to uncover a correlation coefficient that is anything but a curveball. The unexpected nature of our findings only adds to the grandeur and mystery of statistical inquiry.
So, as we delve into the interconnected worlds of baseball and database administration, we invite you to join us in rediscovering the playful side of statistics and the surprises that lie beyond the box scores and spreadsheets. After all, even the most "serious" of correlations can't resist a good dad joke every now and then.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, "Baseball and Beyond: Exploring Unlikely Connections," Smith and Doe explore the interplay between seemingly disparate realms and the potential for unexpected correlations. As we venture into the mysterious realm of statistical analysis, it becomes clear that the relationship between the number of games won by the Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and the quantity of database administrators in California is no mere trivial pursuit. It's almost as if the Marlins' fortunes and the database administrators' data are engaged in a game of numerical tug-of-war, each pulling in their own direction.

In "Data Science for Dummies," Jones posits the idea that statistical analysis can often lead to surprising discoveries that challenge conventional wisdom. Much like a knuckleball that dances its way to the plate, our research has uncovered an unexpected correlation coefficient that seems to defy the odds. It appears that the Marlins and California's database administrators are engaged in a statistical dance, each influencing the other in a manner that elicits more than a few raised eyebrows.

But let's not discount the role of humor in data analysis. As we peel back the layers of this statistical onion, we find ourselves pondering the old adage: "Why was the math book sad? Because it had too many problems." Despite the complexities of statistical analysis, it's essential to inject a dose of humor into our exploration. After all, who says number crunching can't be a laugh riot?

Turning to the realm of fiction, one can't help but draw parallels between our findings and the whimsical world of "Moneyball" by Michael Lewis. Just as Billy Beane sought to upend conventional baseball wisdom, our study challenges the status quo by uncovering a correlation that may seem as improbable as a pitcher hitting a grand slam. It's as if statistical analysis has donned its own rally cap and turned the game on its head.

In the spirit of uncovering unexpected connections, let's not forget the childhood cartoons and television shows that have unwittingly prepared us for this exploratory journey. From "The Magic School Bus" to "Bill Nye the Science Guy," these childhood favorites have instilled in us a sense of wonder and curiosity that fuels our pursuit of unconventional correlations. Who would have thought that the Miami Marlins' victories and the number of database administrators in California could bear resemblance to the zany adventures of "Scooby-Doo" and the gang? Just like unmasking the identity of a ghostly specter, our findings have peeled back the veil on an unlikely statistical relationship, revealing a connection that transcends the boundaries of logic and reason.

As we navigate the labyrinth of statistics and spiritedly unravel the threads of this peculiar correlation, it's impossible to avoid the occasional dad joke. So, why did the statistician break up with the baseball player? They wanted more independence - but not before cozying up with a good laugh or two along the way. There's no question that our research journey is replete with unexpected twists and turns, much like a knuckleball in flight.

So, buckle up and get ready to dive into the playful yet informative world of statistics, where the unexpected correlations between a baseball team and a cadre of database administrators await your discovery. And remember, when in doubt, always bring the humor along for the ride!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of games won by Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and The number of database administrators in California. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Baseball Reference and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Swinging for the Fences: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Miami Marlins' Game Wins and California's Database Administrators

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical yet informative study that delves into the seemingly bizarre correlation between the number of games won by the Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and the quantity of database administrators in the golden state of California. Our research team combed through data from Baseball Reference and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to address this quirky inquiry. We uncover a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8512660 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2020.

Our analysis goes beyond the diamond to reveal an unexpected tie between the success of the Miami Marlins and the abundance of database administrators in the tech hub of California. It's as if these two seemingly unrelated entities are playing a game of "catch" when it comes to their numbers. Just when you think you've covered all the bases, this data playfully reminds us of the whimsical connections that can emerge in the world of statistics.

As we unravel this quirky association, we also weave in the occasional dad joke for good measure. Because after all, what is statistics without a little humor? So, whether you're a fan of baseball or bytes, join us as we explore the correlation between wins on the field and wins in the database world - and try not to strike out on the fun along the way!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
A famous philosopher, Yogi Berra, once mused, "Baseball is 90% mental and the other half is physical." In the same vein, as we embark on our statistical journey, we are reminded that data analysis is 110% objective and the other half is a pinch of humor. It's with this philosophy in mind that we approach the unexpected correlation between the Miami Marlins' game wins and the number of database administrators in California; a correlation that has left statisticians scratching their heads and tossing around more than just baseballs.
In the quest to peel back the layers of this statistical onion, we find ourselves pondering the age-old debate: is it merely a coincidence that both the success of a baseball team and the demand for tech-savvy professionals are on the rise? Or perhaps, there exists a deeper cosmic connection that even the most astute researcher might overlook. One thing is for certain, this study is anything but a wild pitch; it aims to bridge the gap between statistical analysis and a good chuckle.
Much like the art of data analysis, baseball requires a keen eye and a strategic approach. Just as a batter scours the opposition's pitch for patterns and weaknesses, we have combed through years of game wins by the Miami Marlins and the count of database administrators in California to uncover a correlation coefficient that is anything but a curveball. The unexpected nature of our findings only adds to the grandeur and mystery of statistical inquiry.
So, as we delve into the interconnected worlds of baseball and database administration, we invite you to join us in rediscovering the playful side of statistics and the surprises that lie beyond the box scores and spreadsheets. After all, even the most "serious" of correlations can't resist a good dad joke every now and then.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the perplexing relationship between the number of games won by the Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and the count of database administrators in California, our research team employed a combination of statistical methods and a dash of whimsy. We collected data from 2003 to 2020, leveraging sources such as Baseball Reference and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. While the initial process involved sifting through a mountain of numbers, it was anything but a "numbers game" as we navigated through the intricacies of both sports and tech data.

In order to create a level playing field for analysis, we utilized multiple regression analysis to account for potential confounding variables such as the overall performance of the National League (East Division) and the general economic climate in California. We knew we had to cover all the bases when it came to statistical control, leaving no stone unturned so as not to have any "errors" reminiscent of a baseball outfielder. Speaking of which, did you hear about the statistician who drowned crossing a river? It was three feet deep on average.

After ensuring the statistical validity of our model, we calculated the correlation coefficient to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship between the number of game wins by the Miami Marlins and the count of database administrators in California. It was nothing short of a "home run" when we uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8512660 and p < 0.01. It seems that even in the realm of statistics, there are no errors - just batting averages!

To further bolster our approach, we committed to a sensitivity analysis to assess the robustness of our findings. This allowed us to examine the stability of the correlation between game wins and the number of database administrators, keeping any potential curveballs at bay. We aimed to remove any outliers from our dataset, ensuring that our results weren't thrown off by any stray "fastballs."

In addition to the quantitative analysis, we also conducted qualitative interviews with a sample of baseball enthusiasts and tech professionals. Their insights added a human element to our research, shedding light on the intangible factors that may contribute to the correlation we uncovered. It was a reminder that behind every statistic lies a story - and maybe even a few dad jokes. But it's all in the spirit of good fun and good data.

In the end, our methodology served as the "pitch" that introduced us to the odd yet intriguing world of baseball victories and database administrators. While our findings provide a statistical snapshot of this unlikely correlation, they also serve as a reminder that amidst the seriousness of research, there's always room for a little humor. Because, after all, what's a methodology section without a sprinkle of statistical puns?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of games won by Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and The number of database administrators in California. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Baseball Reference and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8512660, r-squared of 0.7246538, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Swinging for the Fences: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Miami Marlins' Game Wins and California's Database Administrators

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical yet informative study that delves into the seemingly bizarre correlation between the number of games won by the Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and the quantity of database administrators in the golden state of California. Our research team combed through data from Baseball Reference and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to address this quirky inquiry. We uncover a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8512660 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2020.

Our analysis goes beyond the diamond to reveal an unexpected tie between the success of the Miami Marlins and the abundance of database administrators in the tech hub of California. It's as if these two seemingly unrelated entities are playing a game of "catch" when it comes to their numbers. Just when you think you've covered all the bases, this data playfully reminds us of the whimsical connections that can emerge in the world of statistics.

As we unravel this quirky association, we also weave in the occasional dad joke for good measure. Because after all, what is statistics without a little humor? So, whether you're a fan of baseball or bytes, join us as we explore the correlation between wins on the field and wins in the database world - and try not to strike out on the fun along the way!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
A famous philosopher, Yogi Berra, once mused, "Baseball is 90% mental and the other half is physical." In the same vein, as we embark on our statistical journey, we are reminded that data analysis is 110% objective and the other half is a pinch of humor. It's with this philosophy in mind that we approach the unexpected correlation between the Miami Marlins' game wins and the number of database administrators in California; a correlation that has left statisticians scratching their heads and tossing around more than just baseballs.
In the quest to peel back the layers of this statistical onion, we find ourselves pondering the age-old debate: is it merely a coincidence that both the success of a baseball team and the demand for tech-savvy professionals are on the rise? Or perhaps, there exists a deeper cosmic connection that even the most astute researcher might overlook. One thing is for certain, this study is anything but a wild pitch; it aims to bridge the gap between statistical analysis and a good chuckle.
Much like the art of data analysis, baseball requires a keen eye and a strategic approach. Just as a batter scours the opposition's pitch for patterns and weaknesses, we have combed through years of game wins by the Miami Marlins and the count of database administrators in California to uncover a correlation coefficient that is anything but a curveball. The unexpected nature of our findings only adds to the grandeur and mystery of statistical inquiry.
So, as we delve into the interconnected worlds of baseball and database administration, we invite you to join us in rediscovering the playful side of statistics and the surprises that lie beyond the box scores and spreadsheets. After all, even the most "serious" of correlations can't resist a good dad joke every now and then.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis unearthed a strong positive correlation between the number of games won by the Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and the quantity of database administrators in sunny California. With a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8512660 and an r-squared of 0.7246538, our findings made us ponder if perhaps a winning game strategy also translates to a winning database strategy. It seems the Marlins weren't the only ones hitting home runs in this correlation!

Speaking of home runs, it's quite a statistical grand slam to uncover such a compelling association between these variables. It's as if the Marlins were knocking it out of the ballpark, and the demand for database administrators in California was following suit – talk about a home-run relationship!

The p-value of less than 0.01 further cements the significance of this correlation, indicating that the likelihood of this relationship occurring by mere chance is lower than the odds of finding a four-leaf clover in the outfield. This connection between America's favorite pastime and the tech world is certainly a curveball in the world of statistical inquiry.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong correlation between the number of games won by the Miami Marlins and the count of database administrators in California, illustrating a trend that is as clear as a cloudless day at the stadium. This visual representation does more than just hit it out of the park; it brings the playful nature of statistics to life and adds an element of whimsy to our research.

In discovering this unexpected correlation, we've hit a statistical "homer"? Whether you're a fan of baseball or databases, it's clear from this analysis that sometimes the most intriguing connections can emerge from the most unexpected places. With the data "on base," it's no wonder that statistics continues to surprise and entertain us with its fascinating correlations.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of games won by Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and The number of database administrators in California. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Swinging for the Fences: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Miami Marlins' Game Wins and California's Database Administrators

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical yet informative study that delves into the seemingly bizarre correlation between the number of games won by the Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and the quantity of database administrators in the golden state of California. Our research team combed through data from Baseball Reference and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to address this quirky inquiry. We uncover a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8512660 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2020.

Our analysis goes beyond the diamond to reveal an unexpected tie between the success of the Miami Marlins and the abundance of database administrators in the tech hub of California. It's as if these two seemingly unrelated entities are playing a game of "catch" when it comes to their numbers. Just when you think you've covered all the bases, this data playfully reminds us of the whimsical connections that can emerge in the world of statistics.

As we unravel this quirky association, we also weave in the occasional dad joke for good measure. Because after all, what is statistics without a little humor? So, whether you're a fan of baseball or bytes, join us as we explore the correlation between wins on the field and wins in the database world - and try not to strike out on the fun along the way!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, "Baseball and Beyond: Exploring Unlikely Connections," Smith and Doe explore the interplay between seemingly disparate realms and the potential for unexpected correlations. As we venture into the mysterious realm of statistical analysis, it becomes clear that the relationship between the number of games won by the Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and the quantity of database administrators in California is no mere trivial pursuit. It's almost as if the Marlins' fortunes and the database administrators' data are engaged in a game of numerical tug-of-war, each pulling in their own direction.
In "Data Science for Dummies," Jones posits the idea that statistical analysis can often lead to surprising discoveries that challenge conventional wisdom. Much like a knuckleball that dances its way to the plate, our research has uncovered an unexpected correlation coefficient that seems to defy the odds. It appears that the Marlins and California's database administrators are engaged in a statistical dance, each influencing the other in a manner that elicits more than a few raised eyebrows.
But let's not discount the role of humor in data analysis. As we peel back the layers of this statistical onion, we find ourselves pondering the old adage: "Why was the math book sad? Because it had too many problems." Despite the complexities of statistical analysis, it's essential to inject a dose of humor into our exploration. After all, who says number crunching can't be a laugh riot?
Turning to the realm of fiction, one can't help but draw parallels between our findings and the whimsical world of "Moneyball" by Michael Lewis. Just as Billy Beane sought to upend conventional baseball wisdom, our study challenges the status quo by uncovering a correlation that may seem as improbable as a pitcher hitting a grand slam. It's as if statistical analysis has donned its own rally cap and turned the game on its head.
In the spirit of uncovering unexpected connections, let's not forget the childhood cartoons and television shows that have unwittingly prepared us for this exploratory journey. From "The Magic School Bus" to "Bill Nye the Science Guy," these childhood favorites have instilled in us a sense of wonder and curiosity that fuels our pursuit of unconventional correlations. Who would have thought that the Miami Marlins' victories and the number of database administrators in California could bear resemblance to the zany adventures of "Scooby-Doo" and the gang? Just like unmasking the identity of a ghostly specter, our findings have peeled back the veil on an unlikely statistical relationship, revealing a connection that transcends the boundaries of logic and reason.
As we navigate the labyrinth of statistics and spiritedly unravel the threads of this peculiar correlation, it's impossible to avoid the occasional dad joke. So, why did the statistician break up with the baseball player? They wanted more independence - but not before cozying up with a good laugh or two along the way. There's no question that our research journey is replete with unexpected twists and turns, much like a knuckleball in flight.
So, buckle up and get ready to dive into the playful yet informative world of statistics, where the unexpected correlations between a baseball team and a cadre of database administrators await your discovery. And remember, when in doubt, always bring the humor along for the ride!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis unearthed a strong positive correlation between the number of games won by the Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and the quantity of database administrators in sunny California. With a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8512660 and an r-squared of 0.7246538, our findings made us ponder if perhaps a winning game strategy also translates to a winning database strategy. It seems the Marlins weren't the only ones hitting home runs in this correlation!
Speaking of home runs, it's quite a statistical grand slam to uncover such a compelling association between these variables. It's as if the Marlins were knocking it out of the ballpark, and the demand for database administrators in California was following suit – talk about a home-run relationship!
The p-value of less than 0.01 further cements the significance of this correlation, indicating that the likelihood of this relationship occurring by mere chance is lower than the odds of finding a four-leaf clover in the outfield. This connection between America's favorite pastime and the tech world is certainly a curveball in the world of statistical inquiry.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong correlation between the number of games won by the Miami Marlins and the count of database administrators in California, illustrating a trend that is as clear as a cloudless day at the stadium. This visual representation does more than just hit it out of the park; it brings the playful nature of statistics to life and adds an element of whimsy to our research.
In discovering this unexpected correlation, we've hit a statistical "homer"? Whether you're a fan of baseball or databases, it's clear from this analysis that sometimes the most intriguing connections can emerge from the most unexpected places. With the data "on base," it's no wonder that statistics continues to surprise and entertain us with its fascinating correlations.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study have shed light on the delightful relationship between the number of games won by the Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and the count of database administrators in the sun-soaked state of California. It appears that these seemingly unrelated entities are engaged in a statistical pas de deux, with each exerting a surprising influence on the other. It's as if the Marlins' victories and the demand for database administrators in California are engaged in a playful game of "tag," each taking turns in the spotlight.

Our results not only support the prior research by Smith and Doe, who emphasized the potential for unexpected correlations, but they also give credence to the notion put forth by Jones in "Data Science for Dummies" regarding the surprising nature of statistical analyses. The correlation coefficient of 0.8512660 and a p-value of less than 0.01 provide compelling evidence that the fortunes of the Miami Marlins and the number of database administrators in California are indeed intertwined in a manner that defies conventional logic.

In this context, statistical analysis becomes more than just a series of numbers and calculations; it transforms into a whimsical playground where the antics of variables can surprise and delight us much like a well-timed punchline. Our study has highlighted a connection that may seem as improbable as a left-handed catcher, yet it stands as a testament to the lighthearted nature of statistical discovery.

As we consider the scatterplot, it becomes evident that the relationship between these variables is as clear and uncomplicated as a brilliant day at the ballpark. This visualization not only captures the essence of our findings but also adds a touch of playful intrigue to our research, akin to the excitement of an unexpected bloop single in the bottom of the ninth.

It's clear that the humor and levity infused into our study have not detracted from the scientific rigor of our findings; rather, they have enriched our exploration of this playful correlation. After all, who says statistical analysis can't be as entertaining as a stand-up comedy routine? This study serves as a lighthearted reminder that even in the world of statistics, the unexpected can bring a dash of amusement and wonder, making our journey through data analysis more captivating than a grand slam in the bottom of the ninth.

In unraveling the connection between the Miami Marlins' game wins and California's database administrators, our research has not only elevated the spirit of statistical inquiry but has also showcased the whimsical and delightful side of exploring correlations. As we wrap up our discussion, it's essential to recognize that statistical analysis, much like a well-crafted dad joke, has the power to amuse, surprise, and captivate – proving yet again that sometimes the most delightful connections emerge from the unlikeliest of sources.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of games won by Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and The number of database administrators in California. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Swinging for the Fences: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Miami Marlins' Game Wins and California's Database Administrators

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents a whimsical yet informative study that delves into the seemingly bizarre correlation between the number of games won by the Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and the quantity of database administrators in the golden state of California. Our research team combed through data from Baseball Reference and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to address this quirky inquiry. We uncover a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8512660 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2020.

Our analysis goes beyond the diamond to reveal an unexpected tie between the success of the Miami Marlins and the abundance of database administrators in the tech hub of California. It's as if these two seemingly unrelated entities are playing a game of "catch" when it comes to their numbers. Just when you think you've covered all the bases, this data playfully reminds us of the whimsical connections that can emerge in the world of statistics.

As we unravel this quirky association, we also weave in the occasional dad joke for good measure. Because after all, what is statistics without a little humor? So, whether you're a fan of baseball or bytes, join us as we explore the correlation between wins on the field and wins in the database world - and try not to strike out on the fun along the way!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
A famous philosopher, Yogi Berra, once mused, "Baseball is 90% mental and the other half is physical." In the same vein, as we embark on our statistical journey, we are reminded that data analysis is 110% objective and the other half is a pinch of humor. It's with this philosophy in mind that we approach the unexpected correlation between the Miami Marlins' game wins and the number of database administrators in California; a correlation that has left statisticians scratching their heads and tossing around more than just baseballs.
In the quest to peel back the layers of this statistical onion, we find ourselves pondering the age-old debate: is it merely a coincidence that both the success of a baseball team and the demand for tech-savvy professionals are on the rise? Or perhaps, there exists a deeper cosmic connection that even the most astute researcher might overlook. One thing is for certain, this study is anything but a wild pitch; it aims to bridge the gap between statistical analysis and a good chuckle.
Much like the art of data analysis, baseball requires a keen eye and a strategic approach. Just as a batter scours the opposition's pitch for patterns and weaknesses, we have combed through years of game wins by the Miami Marlins and the count of database administrators in California to uncover a correlation coefficient that is anything but a curveball. The unexpected nature of our findings only adds to the grandeur and mystery of statistical inquiry.
So, as we delve into the interconnected worlds of baseball and database administration, we invite you to join us in rediscovering the playful side of statistics and the surprises that lie beyond the box scores and spreadsheets. After all, even the most "serious" of correlations can't resist a good dad joke every now and then.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis unearthed a strong positive correlation between the number of games won by the Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and the quantity of database administrators in sunny California. With a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8512660 and an r-squared of 0.7246538, our findings made us ponder if perhaps a winning game strategy also translates to a winning database strategy. It seems the Marlins weren't the only ones hitting home runs in this correlation!
Speaking of home runs, it's quite a statistical grand slam to uncover such a compelling association between these variables. It's as if the Marlins were knocking it out of the ballpark, and the demand for database administrators in California was following suit – talk about a home-run relationship!
The p-value of less than 0.01 further cements the significance of this correlation, indicating that the likelihood of this relationship occurring by mere chance is lower than the odds of finding a four-leaf clover in the outfield. This connection between America's favorite pastime and the tech world is certainly a curveball in the world of statistical inquiry.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong correlation between the number of games won by the Miami Marlins and the count of database administrators in California, illustrating a trend that is as clear as a cloudless day at the stadium. This visual representation does more than just hit it out of the park; it brings the playful nature of statistics to life and adds an element of whimsy to our research.
In discovering this unexpected correlation, we've hit a statistical "homer"? Whether you're a fan of baseball or databases, it's clear from this analysis that sometimes the most intriguing connections can emerge from the most unexpected places. With the data "on base," it's no wonder that statistics continues to surprise and entertain us with its fascinating correlations.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our statistical journey has led us to uncover a delightful correlation between the Miami Marlins' game wins and the number of database administrators in California. It's as if the Marlins' victories were echoing through the waves of the Pacific, conjuring up a surge in the demand for database prowess. This correlation is more solid than an all-star shortstop's defense and as intriguing as a knuckleball in the database world.

Our findings not only add a touch of whimsy to the field of statistics but also emphasize that even the most unexpected correlations can hit statistical grand slams. This study exemplifies the playful nature of statistical inquiry, proving that sometimes the most peculiar connections can emerge from the most unlikely pairings.

As we bid adieu to this captivating correlation, we are reminded of a classic dad joke: "Why did the database administrator break up with the baseball player? She thought he was too field-oriented." It seems like even our variables couldn't resist a good pun or two!

In the end, this research unequivocally asserts that there is no need for further inquiry in this peculiar yet entertaining area of study. With a statistical relationship as robust as this, it's clear that the connection between wins on the field and wins in the database world is not just a statistical anomaly but a delightful reminder of the humorous side of research. After all, who needs more research when the findings already hit it out of the park?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Swinging for the Fences: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Miami Marlins' Game Wins and California's Database Administrators. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sports Analytics and Techonomics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Swinging for the Fences: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Miami Marlins' Game Wins and California's Database Administrators. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Interdisciplinary Sports and Technology Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Swinging for the Fences: A Statistical Analysis of the Relationship between Miami Marlins' Game Wins and California's Database Administrators with an abstract of This paper presents a whimsical yet informative study that delves into the seemingly bizarre correlation between the number of games won by the Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) and the quantity of database administrators in the golden state of California. Our research team combed through data from Baseball Reference and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to address this quirky inquiry. We uncover a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8512660 and p < 0.01 for the years 2003 to 2020.
Our analysis goes beyond the diamond to reveal an unexpected tie between the success of the Miami Marlins and the abundance of database administrators in the tech hub of California. It's as if these two seemingly unrelated entities are playing a game of "catch" when it comes to their numbers. Just when you think you've covered all the bases, this data playfully reminds us of the whimsical connections that can emerge in the world of statistics.
As we unravel this quirky association, we also weave in the occasional dad joke for good measure. Because after all, what is statistics without a little humor? So, whether you're a fan of baseball or bytes, join us as we explore the correlation between wins on the field and wins in the database world - and try not to strike out on the fun along the way!

ChatGPT:

Miami Marlins, game wins, statistics, statistical analysis, correlation, California, database administrators, National League, East Division, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, tech hub, baseball reference, quirky, whimsical, data analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Number of games won by Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division)
Source: Baseball Reference
See what else correlates with Number of games won by Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division)

The number of database administrators in California
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of database administrators in California
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of database administrators in California

Correlation r = 0.8512660 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7246538 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 72.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of database administrators in California) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Number of games won by Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division)) over the 18 years from 2003 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.5E-6. 0.0000074695116886292980000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 0.00075% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 133,878 random variables You don't actually need 133 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.64, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Number of games won by Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division) (Games Won)918383787184878072696277717977635731
The number of database administrators in California (Database Administrators)1342011940109601105011480140801295012380109201051010910108701204012370120301097082007830




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([91,83,83,78,71,84,87,80,72,69,62,77,71,79,77,63,57,31,])
array_2 = np.array([13420,11940,10960,11050,11480,14080,12950,12380,10920,10510,10910,10870,12040,12370,12030,10970,8200,7830,])
array_1_name = "Number of games won by Miami Marlins in the National League (East Division)"
array_2_name = "The number of database administrators in California"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 3242 · Black Variable ID: 365 · Red Variable ID: 5338
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0