about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,229 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo and the second variable is The number of compensation and benefits managers in Maine.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Cristiano Ronaldo's absence from Portugal matches led to a decrease in demand for fancy footwork, thus rendering the need for managing compensation and benefits in Maine as unnecessary. After all, there's only so much strategic planning and negotiation one can do when the game has changed!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a TIME magazine cover featuring a scene in a small Maine office where Cristiano Ronaldo is sitting behind a desk stacked with paperwork, dressed in a suit and tie. He is seen talking on the phone with a client about compensation and benefits packages. Meanwhile, in the background, there are multiple empty desks and chairs, symbolizing a shortage of compensation and benefits managers in Maine, as they have all left to pursue soccer careers like Ronaldo. Outside the office, a soccer field in Portugal shows the national team playing a match without Ronaldo, who is absent due to his new job. The visual should capture the contrast between the office setting and the soccer field, showcasing Ronaldo's transition from the soccer pitch to the corporate world. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo and The number of compensation and benefits managers in Maine. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Minimalism An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie A photo-realistic image A TIME magazine cover image Charcoal
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo and The number of compensation and benefits managers in Maine, in the following situation: Because Cristiano Ronaldo played fewer matches for Portugal, he had more time to moonlight as a compensation and benefits manager in Maine. This led to a shortage of such professionals as they all quit to become professional soccer players.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small office in Maine, Cristiano Ronaldo, wearing a suit and tie, sits behind a desk stacked with paperwork. He is on the phone with a client, discussing compensation and benefits packages. Meanwhile, on a soccer field in Portugal, the national team plays a match without Ronaldo, who is absent due to his new job. In the background, there are multiple empty desks and chairs in the office, symbolizing the shortage of compensation and benefits managers in Maine as they all left to pursue soccer careers like Ronaldo.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a small office in Maine, Cristiano Ronaldo, wearing a suit and tie, sits behind a desk stacked with paperwork. He is on the phone with a client, discussing compensation and benefits packages. Meanwhile, on a soccer field in Portugal, the national team plays a match without Ronaldo, who is absent due to his new job. In the background, there are multiple empty desks and chairs in the office, symbolizing the shortage of compensation and benefits managers in Maine as they all left to pursue soccer careers like Ronaldo. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a TIME magazine cover featuring a scene in a small Maine office where Cristiano Ronaldo is sitting behind a desk stacked with paperwork, dressed in a suit and tie. He is seen talking on the phone with a client about compensation and benefits packages. Meanwhile, in the background, there are multiple empty desks and chairs, symbolizing a shortage of compensation and benefits managers in Maine, as they have all left to pursue soccer careers like Ronaldo. Outside the office, a soccer field in Portugal shows the national team playing a match without Ronaldo, who is absent due to his new job. The visual should capture the contrast between the office setting and the soccer field, showcasing Ronaldo's transition from the soccer pitch to the corporate world.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo caused The number of compensation and benefits managers in Maine to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Cristiano Ronaldo's Footwork and Maine's Compensation and Benefits Maneuvers: A Correlational Analysis

The Journal of Athletic Performance and Workplace Strategy

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo and The number of compensation and benefits managers in Maine. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9236484 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Cristiano Ronaldo's Footwork and Maine's Compensation and Benefits Maneuvers: A Correlational Analysis"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the captivating correlation between the number of matches played by the renowned football sensation, Cristiano Ronaldo, for Portugal's national team and the number of compensation and benefits managers in the picturesque state of Maine. Utilizing data gleaned from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we employed rigorous statistical methods to uncover the surprising link between these seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9236484 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2004 to 2022. Our investigation not only sheds light on this intriguing association but also underscores the importance of approaching research with a dash of humor and curiosity. So, hold on to your boots and buckle up, as we embark on this whimsical yet insightful journey through the world of statistics and sports.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo and The number of compensation and benefits managers in Maine. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cristiano Ronaldo's Footwork and Maine's Compensation and Benefits Maneuvers: A Correlational Analysis"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the captivating correlation between the number of matches played by the renowned football sensation, Cristiano Ronaldo, for Portugal's national team and the number of compensation and benefits managers in the picturesque state of Maine. Utilizing data gleaned from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we employed rigorous statistical methods to uncover the surprising link between these seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9236484 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2004 to 2022. Our investigation not only sheds light on this intriguing association but also underscores the importance of approaching research with a dash of humor and curiosity. So, hold on to your boots and buckle up, as we embark on this whimsical yet insightful journey through the world of statistics and sports.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

When it comes to the world of sports, curiosity often leads to surprising discoveries. As researchers, we are constantly on the lookout for unconventional correlations and unexpected connections. In this study, we aim to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the number of matches played by the illustrious Cristiano Ronaldo for Portugal's national team and the presence of compensation and benefits managers in the delightful state of Maine. While at first glance, this association may appear as incongruous as a pair of mismatched socks, our analysis uncovers a correlation that is as captivating as a well-executed bicycle kick.

When pondering the juxtaposition of a football star's exploits with the esoteric world of compensation and benefits management, one may be left scratching their head akin to a fan trying to decipher an offside call. However, as we embark on this peculiar journey, we are reminded that in the realm of statistics, the game of surprises never ceases to amaze.

The striking correlation coefficient of 0.9236484 and p < 0.01 that we discovered between these unlikely bedfellows is indeed as eye-catching as one of Ronaldo's gravity-defying headers. Our analysis, spanning the years of 2004 to 2022, leaves us not only astounded but also eager to share our findings with the world. The statistical harmony between Ronaldo's exploits on the field and the proliferation of compensation and benefits managers in the tranquil state of Maine evokes a sense of wonder akin to witnessing an unexpected midfield goal.

While our pursuit began with a hint of jest and a surplus of skepticism, the adventure has led us to an invaluable revelation that illustrates the whimsical and unanticipated nature of statistical inquiry. Therefore, brace yourselves for a research endeavor that is as entertaining as a Ronaldo free-kick and as enlightening as an epiphany induced by a complex regression analysis. So, grab your calculators, dust off your football trivia, and join us in the exploration of this delightful confluence of sports, data, and a sprinkle of humor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo and The number of compensation and benefits managers in Maine. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cristiano Ronaldo's Footwork and Maine's Compensation and Benefits Maneuvers: A Correlational Analysis"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the captivating correlation between the number of matches played by the renowned football sensation, Cristiano Ronaldo, for Portugal's national team and the number of compensation and benefits managers in the picturesque state of Maine. Utilizing data gleaned from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we employed rigorous statistical methods to uncover the surprising link between these seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9236484 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2004 to 2022. Our investigation not only sheds light on this intriguing association but also underscores the importance of approaching research with a dash of humor and curiosity. So, hold on to your boots and buckle up, as we embark on this whimsical yet insightful journey through the world of statistics and sports.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
When it comes to the world of sports, curiosity often leads to surprising discoveries. As researchers, we are constantly on the lookout for unconventional correlations and unexpected connections. In this study, we aim to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the number of matches played by the illustrious Cristiano Ronaldo for Portugal's national team and the presence of compensation and benefits managers in the delightful state of Maine. While at first glance, this association may appear as incongruous as a pair of mismatched socks, our analysis uncovers a correlation that is as captivating as a well-executed bicycle kick.
When pondering the juxtaposition of a football star's exploits with the esoteric world of compensation and benefits management, one may be left scratching their head akin to a fan trying to decipher an offside call. However, as we embark on this peculiar journey, we are reminded that in the realm of statistics, the game of surprises never ceases to amaze.
The striking correlation coefficient of 0.9236484 and p < 0.01 that we discovered between these unlikely bedfellows is indeed as eye-catching as one of Ronaldo's gravity-defying headers. Our analysis, spanning the years of 2004 to 2022, leaves us not only astounded but also eager to share our findings with the world. The statistical harmony between Ronaldo's exploits on the field and the proliferation of compensation and benefits managers in the tranquil state of Maine evokes a sense of wonder akin to witnessing an unexpected midfield goal.
While our pursuit began with a hint of jest and a surplus of skepticism, the adventure has led us to an invaluable revelation that illustrates the whimsical and unanticipated nature of statistical inquiry. Therefore, brace yourselves for a research endeavor that is as entertaining as a Ronaldo free-kick and as enlightening as an epiphany induced by a complex regression analysis. So, grab your calculators, dust off your football trivia, and join us in the exploration of this delightful confluence of sports, data, and a sprinkle of humor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

As we set out to explore the mysterious link between Cristiano Ronaldo's performances with Portugal's national team and the presence of compensation and benefits managers in the charming state of Maine, it is essential to first ground our investigation in existing literature. Smith and colleagues (2015) conducted a seminal study on the impact of sports phenoms on obscure professional domains, shedding light on the potential ripple effects of athletic prowess in unexpected sectors. Their findings laid the groundwork for our current inquiry, hinting at the enthralling interplay between a football star's exploits and the idyllic landscape of benefits management in Maine.

Doe (2018) unraveled the resilient thread that weaves through seemingly disparate domains, presenting compelling evidence for the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. Their work served as a beacon of inspiration, propelling our team to embark on this whimsical yet purposeful journey.

Furthermore, Jones and Smith (2019) delved into the statistical anomalies that often lurk within the ordinary, urging researchers to embrace the quirkier side of data analysis. Their contributions nudged us to approach our investigation with a blend of levity and rigor, ultimately shaping the tone and spirit of our inquiry.

Turning to the wider literature, "The Power of Football: Exploring Unlikely Influences" by Anderson and "Maine's Management Marvels: Unraveling the Enigma" by Johnson et al. offered intriguing insights into the realms of sports and professional practices, respectively. Although not directly related to our specific correlation, these texts underscored the richness and complexity of the fields we seek to intertwine in our study.

On a more playful note, the fictitious works of "The Ball Kicks Back: Football's Impact on Mundane Matters" by A. Novel and "Compensation Chronicles: Tales of Maine's Management Mysteries" by C. Story elegantly wove narratives that, although entirely fictional, mirrored the tangential bond we are exploring.

In our pursuit of a comprehensive understanding of the domains at hand, we also indulged in binge-watching sessions of "The Benefits Brigade" and "Ronaldo's Chronicles" – TV shows that, though unrelated to academia, offered valuable anecdotal perspectives on both compensation management in Maine and Cristiano Ronaldo's career, respectively.

Although the literature provided a solid foundation for our investigation, it also served as a reminder of the importance of infusing our analytical pursuits with a healthy dose of lightheartedness. With this in mind, we proceeded to analyze the interplay between Ronaldo's Portugal matches and Maine's compensation and benefits managers, poised to unravel the serendipitous connection that awaited us.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo and The number of compensation and benefits managers in Maine. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cristiano Ronaldo's Footwork and Maine's Compensation and Benefits Maneuvers: A Correlational Analysis"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the captivating correlation between the number of matches played by the renowned football sensation, Cristiano Ronaldo, for Portugal's national team and the number of compensation and benefits managers in the picturesque state of Maine. Utilizing data gleaned from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we employed rigorous statistical methods to uncover the surprising link between these seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9236484 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2004 to 2022. Our investigation not only sheds light on this intriguing association but also underscores the importance of approaching research with a dash of humor and curiosity. So, hold on to your boots and buckle up, as we embark on this whimsical yet insightful journey through the world of statistics and sports.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
When it comes to the world of sports, curiosity often leads to surprising discoveries. As researchers, we are constantly on the lookout for unconventional correlations and unexpected connections. In this study, we aim to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the number of matches played by the illustrious Cristiano Ronaldo for Portugal's national team and the presence of compensation and benefits managers in the delightful state of Maine. While at first glance, this association may appear as incongruous as a pair of mismatched socks, our analysis uncovers a correlation that is as captivating as a well-executed bicycle kick.
When pondering the juxtaposition of a football star's exploits with the esoteric world of compensation and benefits management, one may be left scratching their head akin to a fan trying to decipher an offside call. However, as we embark on this peculiar journey, we are reminded that in the realm of statistics, the game of surprises never ceases to amaze.
The striking correlation coefficient of 0.9236484 and p < 0.01 that we discovered between these unlikely bedfellows is indeed as eye-catching as one of Ronaldo's gravity-defying headers. Our analysis, spanning the years of 2004 to 2022, leaves us not only astounded but also eager to share our findings with the world. The statistical harmony between Ronaldo's exploits on the field and the proliferation of compensation and benefits managers in the tranquil state of Maine evokes a sense of wonder akin to witnessing an unexpected midfield goal.
While our pursuit began with a hint of jest and a surplus of skepticism, the adventure has led us to an invaluable revelation that illustrates the whimsical and unanticipated nature of statistical inquiry. Therefore, brace yourselves for a research endeavor that is as entertaining as a Ronaldo free-kick and as enlightening as an epiphany induced by a complex regression analysis. So, grab your calculators, dust off your football trivia, and join us in the exploration of this delightful confluence of sports, data, and a sprinkle of humor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

Data Collection:
Our research team embarked on a digital odyssey, scouring the vast expanse of the internet to obtain the necessary data for this unusual inquiry. While we utilized a variety of sources, including the hallowed archives of Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we can neither confirm nor deny the excessive consumption of caffeinated beverages in the pursuit of these invaluable datasets.

The primary variables of interest were the number of matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo for Portugal's national team and the count of compensation and benefits managers in the charming state of Maine. Assembling this treasure trove of statistical nuggets covering the years 2004 to 2022 required a blend of patience, persistence, and the occasional spontaneous eruption of laughter during late-night data mining sessions.

Statistical Analysis:
With our data firmly in hand (or rather, in the digital confines of our hard drives), we armed ourselves with a formidable arsenal of statistical tools. Our arsenal included correlation analysis, scatter plots, and regression models, which were wielded with the finesse of a football maestro orchestrating a last-minute comeback.

The technique employed for analyzing the correlation between the number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo and the number of compensation and benefits managers in Maine was as intricate as the choreography of Ronaldo's celebratory dance moves. We calculated the correlation coefficient and its associated p-value to determine the strength and significance of the relationship between these seemingly distant variables.

To ensure the robustness of our findings, we also conducted sensitivity analyses to gauge the impact of outliers and hypothetical what-if scenarios involving Ronaldo mysteriously donning the cap of a compensation and benefits manager in Maine. Alas, the latter scenario was purely a product of scholarly mirth and not a part of our actual statistical exercises.

Ethical Considerations:
In the pursuit of knowledge, it is imperative to uphold the tenets of academic integrity and ethical conduct. As such, we meticulously adhered to the principles of data transparency and rigor, ensuring that our findings are presented with the lucidity of a well-crafted set piece play.

Furthermore, we recognize the gravity of our quest to unravel the perplexing correlation between Ronaldo's football exploits and the enigmatic world of compensation and benefits management. Thus, in our statistical escapades, we remained steadfastly committed to the spirit of intellectual curiosity and scholarly amusement, endeavoring to infuse our rigorous analysis with a dash of levity and whimsy whenever feasible.

Limitations:
Despite the fervor and dedication invested in this study, it is incumbent upon us to acknowledge the inherent limitations of such an unconventional investigation. The reliance on publicly available data sources exposes our findings to the potential influence of unknown confounders and unanticipated quirks, much like an unexpected gust of wind altering the trajectory of a well-struck soccer ball.

Moreover, the nature of correlation analysis affords us the luxury of identifying associations rather than discerning causality. Thus, while we are captivated by the statistical harmony between Ronaldo's on-field feats and the prevalence of compensation and benefits managers in Maine, we must exercise caution in attributing a direct causal link between these revelatory phenomena.

Lastly, it is worth noting that conducting research with a prominent element of humor and curiosity introduces the subtle risk of scholarly whimsy occasionally spilling into the realm of whimsical scholarship. Nonetheless, our commitment to academic rigor and lighthearted inquiry remains unwavering, as we believe that the marriage of statistical inquiry and scholarly charm enriches the tapestry of academic discourse.

In light of these methodological considerations, we stand ready to present the fruits of our labor – a revelatory exploration of the enthralling correlation between Ronaldo's footwork and Maine's compensation and benefits maneuvers – with the scientific rigor of an esteemed football referee and the scholarly flair of a data-driven raconteur.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo and The number of compensation and benefits managers in Maine. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9236484, r-squared of 0.8531263, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cristiano Ronaldo's Footwork and Maine's Compensation and Benefits Maneuvers: A Correlational Analysis"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the captivating correlation between the number of matches played by the renowned football sensation, Cristiano Ronaldo, for Portugal's national team and the number of compensation and benefits managers in the picturesque state of Maine. Utilizing data gleaned from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we employed rigorous statistical methods to uncover the surprising link between these seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9236484 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2004 to 2022. Our investigation not only sheds light on this intriguing association but also underscores the importance of approaching research with a dash of humor and curiosity. So, hold on to your boots and buckle up, as we embark on this whimsical yet insightful journey through the world of statistics and sports.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
When it comes to the world of sports, curiosity often leads to surprising discoveries. As researchers, we are constantly on the lookout for unconventional correlations and unexpected connections. In this study, we aim to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the number of matches played by the illustrious Cristiano Ronaldo for Portugal's national team and the presence of compensation and benefits managers in the delightful state of Maine. While at first glance, this association may appear as incongruous as a pair of mismatched socks, our analysis uncovers a correlation that is as captivating as a well-executed bicycle kick.
When pondering the juxtaposition of a football star's exploits with the esoteric world of compensation and benefits management, one may be left scratching their head akin to a fan trying to decipher an offside call. However, as we embark on this peculiar journey, we are reminded that in the realm of statistics, the game of surprises never ceases to amaze.
The striking correlation coefficient of 0.9236484 and p < 0.01 that we discovered between these unlikely bedfellows is indeed as eye-catching as one of Ronaldo's gravity-defying headers. Our analysis, spanning the years of 2004 to 2022, leaves us not only astounded but also eager to share our findings with the world. The statistical harmony between Ronaldo's exploits on the field and the proliferation of compensation and benefits managers in the tranquil state of Maine evokes a sense of wonder akin to witnessing an unexpected midfield goal.
While our pursuit began with a hint of jest and a surplus of skepticism, the adventure has led us to an invaluable revelation that illustrates the whimsical and unanticipated nature of statistical inquiry. Therefore, brace yourselves for a research endeavor that is as entertaining as a Ronaldo free-kick and as enlightening as an epiphany induced by a complex regression analysis. So, grab your calculators, dust off your football trivia, and join us in the exploration of this delightful confluence of sports, data, and a sprinkle of humor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the relationship between the number of matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo for Portugal's national team and the number of compensation and benefits managers in the picturesque state of Maine yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9236484, an r-squared of 0.8531263, and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period from 2004 to 2022.

Figure 1 below provides a visual representation of the compelling correlation between these two variables, reinforcing the strength of the relationship between Ronaldo's footwork and the maneuvering of compensation and benefits specialists in the state of Maine.

The robust correlation coefficient signifies a remarkable degree of association between these seemingly disparate elements. It seems that Ronaldo's dynamic performances on the field might just be kicking and running their way into the realm of organizational management practices. Who would've thought that a forward's finesse could be linked to the administrative acumen of Maine's workforce?

Our findings not only illuminate this unexpected correlation but also emphasize the importance of keeping an open mind and a keen sense of curiosity in the pursuit of statistical inquiry. Just as Ronaldo's plays often leave spectators in awe, our results leave us marveling at the intriguing interplay between sports and labor statistics.

Surely, this correlation will be an intriguing topic for water cooler conversations. Imagine discussing the agile movements of Ronaldo during a match and seamlessly transitioning to the organizational maneuvers in Maine – a conversation that would truly be a game-changer in any social setting.

In conclusion, our research draws attention to the delightful and unforeseen connections that can emerge from rigorous statistical analysis, reminding us that sometimes, the most intriguing revelations come from the most unexpected pairings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo and The number of compensation and benefits managers in Maine. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Cristiano Ronaldo's Footwork and Maine's Compensation and Benefits Maneuvers: A Correlational Analysis"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the captivating correlation between the number of matches played by the renowned football sensation, Cristiano Ronaldo, for Portugal's national team and the number of compensation and benefits managers in the picturesque state of Maine. Utilizing data gleaned from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we employed rigorous statistical methods to uncover the surprising link between these seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9236484 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2004 to 2022. Our investigation not only sheds light on this intriguing association but also underscores the importance of approaching research with a dash of humor and curiosity. So, hold on to your boots and buckle up, as we embark on this whimsical yet insightful journey through the world of statistics and sports.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
As we set out to explore the mysterious link between Cristiano Ronaldo's performances with Portugal's national team and the presence of compensation and benefits managers in the charming state of Maine, it is essential to first ground our investigation in existing literature. Smith and colleagues (2015) conducted a seminal study on the impact of sports phenoms on obscure professional domains, shedding light on the potential ripple effects of athletic prowess in unexpected sectors. Their findings laid the groundwork for our current inquiry, hinting at the enthralling interplay between a football star's exploits and the idyllic landscape of benefits management in Maine.
Doe (2018) unraveled the resilient thread that weaves through seemingly disparate domains, presenting compelling evidence for the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. Their work served as a beacon of inspiration, propelling our team to embark on this whimsical yet purposeful journey.
Furthermore, Jones and Smith (2019) delved into the statistical anomalies that often lurk within the ordinary, urging researchers to embrace the quirkier side of data analysis. Their contributions nudged us to approach our investigation with a blend of levity and rigor, ultimately shaping the tone and spirit of our inquiry.
Turning to the wider literature, "The Power of Football: Exploring Unlikely Influences" by Anderson and "Maine's Management Marvels: Unraveling the Enigma" by Johnson et al. offered intriguing insights into the realms of sports and professional practices, respectively. Although not directly related to our specific correlation, these texts underscored the richness and complexity of the fields we seek to intertwine in our study.
On a more playful note, the fictitious works of "The Ball Kicks Back: Football's Impact on Mundane Matters" by A. Novel and "Compensation Chronicles: Tales of Maine's Management Mysteries" by C. Story elegantly wove narratives that, although entirely fictional, mirrored the tangential bond we are exploring.
In our pursuit of a comprehensive understanding of the domains at hand, we also indulged in binge-watching sessions of "The Benefits Brigade" and "Ronaldo's Chronicles" – TV shows that, though unrelated to academia, offered valuable anecdotal perspectives on both compensation management in Maine and Cristiano Ronaldo's career, respectively.
Although the literature provided a solid foundation for our investigation, it also served as a reminder of the importance of infusing our analytical pursuits with a healthy dose of lightheartedness. With this in mind, we proceeded to analyze the interplay between Ronaldo's Portugal matches and Maine's compensation and benefits managers, poised to unravel the serendipitous connection that awaited us.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between the number of matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo for Portugal's national team and the number of compensation and benefits managers in the picturesque state of Maine yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9236484, an r-squared of 0.8531263, and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period from 2004 to 2022.
Figure 1 below provides a visual representation of the compelling correlation between these two variables, reinforcing the strength of the relationship between Ronaldo's footwork and the maneuvering of compensation and benefits specialists in the state of Maine.
The robust correlation coefficient signifies a remarkable degree of association between these seemingly disparate elements. It seems that Ronaldo's dynamic performances on the field might just be kicking and running their way into the realm of organizational management practices. Who would've thought that a forward's finesse could be linked to the administrative acumen of Maine's workforce?
Our findings not only illuminate this unexpected correlation but also emphasize the importance of keeping an open mind and a keen sense of curiosity in the pursuit of statistical inquiry. Just as Ronaldo's plays often leave spectators in awe, our results leave us marveling at the intriguing interplay between sports and labor statistics.
Surely, this correlation will be an intriguing topic for water cooler conversations. Imagine discussing the agile movements of Ronaldo during a match and seamlessly transitioning to the organizational maneuvers in Maine – a conversation that would truly be a game-changer in any social setting.
In conclusion, our research draws attention to the delightful and unforeseen connections that can emerge from rigorous statistical analysis, reminding us that sometimes, the most intriguing revelations come from the most unexpected pairings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

In our discussion of the correlation between the number of matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo for Portugal's national team and the number of compensation and benefits managers in Maine, we can't help but marvel at the whimsical link we have uncovered. Our findings not only bolster existing research but also add a quirky twist to the world of statistical inquiry.

Harking back to the literature review, the work of Smith and colleagues (2015) takes on a whole new level of significance with our results. Who would have thought that a football star's pizzazz could have such a palpable impact on the professional domain of benefits management in Maine? It seems our analysis has kicked the ball even further down the field, affirming the potential ripple effects of athletic prowess in unexpected sectors.

Doe's (2018) exploration of the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate domains resonates profoundly with our findings. The resilient thread they unraveled seems to have wound its way right into the heart of our correlation coefficient, weaving a compelling narrative of the entwined destinies of Portuguese football and Maine's compensation and benefits industry.

The statistical anomalies that Jones and Smith (2019) urged us to embrace have certainly made their grand appearance in our results. The striking correlation coefficient we've unearthed serves as a playful nod to their call for researchers to explore the quirkier side of data analysis. It seems statistical anomalies can indeed emerge from the most unexpected pairings.

Our findings also bring to mind the fictitious works of "The Ball Kicks Back: Football's Impact on Mundane Matters" and "Compensation Chronicles: Tales of Maine's Management Mysteries." While entirely fictional, these works playfully mirror the tangential bond we've unraveled, reminding us that sometimes truth is stranger than fiction.

As our results converge with the existing literature, the importance of infusing our analytical pursuits with a healthy dose of lightheartedness becomes all the more evident. By unraveling the serendipitous connection between Ronaldo's Portugal matches and Maine's compensation and benefits managers, we have not only upheld the legacy of prior research but also added a dash of whimsy to the world of statistical exploration.

With the correlation coefficient and p-value pointing to a significant association between Ronaldo's footwork and the maneuvering of compensation and benefits specialists in Maine, our research has certainly left us kicking our academic endeavors up a notch. It seems statistical inquiry and athletic prowess have joggled their positions, inviting us to ponder the unexpected pairings that can arise from rigorous analysis.

Therefore, our discussion ultimately highlights the unforeseen and delightful connections that can emerge from the most unexpected statistical pairings. As we marvel at the intriguing interplay between sports and labor statistics, we are reminded that sometimes the most extraordinary revelations come from the most unexpected places. Who would have thought that a football icon's exploits could intersect so amusingly with the seemingly mundane world of compensation and benefits management in Maine? This correlation proves once and for all that you don't need to be a soccer fan to appreciate a good kick about in the data.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo and The number of compensation and benefits managers in Maine. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Cristiano Ronaldo's Footwork and Maine's Compensation and Benefits Maneuvers: A Correlational Analysis"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the captivating correlation between the number of matches played by the renowned football sensation, Cristiano Ronaldo, for Portugal's national team and the number of compensation and benefits managers in the picturesque state of Maine. Utilizing data gleaned from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we employed rigorous statistical methods to uncover the surprising link between these seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9236484 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2004 to 2022. Our investigation not only sheds light on this intriguing association but also underscores the importance of approaching research with a dash of humor and curiosity. So, hold on to your boots and buckle up, as we embark on this whimsical yet insightful journey through the world of statistics and sports.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
When it comes to the world of sports, curiosity often leads to surprising discoveries. As researchers, we are constantly on the lookout for unconventional correlations and unexpected connections. In this study, we aim to unravel the enigmatic relationship between the number of matches played by the illustrious Cristiano Ronaldo for Portugal's national team and the presence of compensation and benefits managers in the delightful state of Maine. While at first glance, this association may appear as incongruous as a pair of mismatched socks, our analysis uncovers a correlation that is as captivating as a well-executed bicycle kick.
When pondering the juxtaposition of a football star's exploits with the esoteric world of compensation and benefits management, one may be left scratching their head akin to a fan trying to decipher an offside call. However, as we embark on this peculiar journey, we are reminded that in the realm of statistics, the game of surprises never ceases to amaze.
The striking correlation coefficient of 0.9236484 and p < 0.01 that we discovered between these unlikely bedfellows is indeed as eye-catching as one of Ronaldo's gravity-defying headers. Our analysis, spanning the years of 2004 to 2022, leaves us not only astounded but also eager to share our findings with the world. The statistical harmony between Ronaldo's exploits on the field and the proliferation of compensation and benefits managers in the tranquil state of Maine evokes a sense of wonder akin to witnessing an unexpected midfield goal.
While our pursuit began with a hint of jest and a surplus of skepticism, the adventure has led us to an invaluable revelation that illustrates the whimsical and unanticipated nature of statistical inquiry. Therefore, brace yourselves for a research endeavor that is as entertaining as a Ronaldo free-kick and as enlightening as an epiphany induced by a complex regression analysis. So, grab your calculators, dust off your football trivia, and join us in the exploration of this delightful confluence of sports, data, and a sprinkle of humor.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between the number of matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo for Portugal's national team and the number of compensation and benefits managers in the picturesque state of Maine yielded a correlation coefficient of 0.9236484, an r-squared of 0.8531263, and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period from 2004 to 2022.
Figure 1 below provides a visual representation of the compelling correlation between these two variables, reinforcing the strength of the relationship between Ronaldo's footwork and the maneuvering of compensation and benefits specialists in the state of Maine.
The robust correlation coefficient signifies a remarkable degree of association between these seemingly disparate elements. It seems that Ronaldo's dynamic performances on the field might just be kicking and running their way into the realm of organizational management practices. Who would've thought that a forward's finesse could be linked to the administrative acumen of Maine's workforce?
Our findings not only illuminate this unexpected correlation but also emphasize the importance of keeping an open mind and a keen sense of curiosity in the pursuit of statistical inquiry. Just as Ronaldo's plays often leave spectators in awe, our results leave us marveling at the intriguing interplay between sports and labor statistics.
Surely, this correlation will be an intriguing topic for water cooler conversations. Imagine discussing the agile movements of Ronaldo during a match and seamlessly transitioning to the organizational maneuvers in Maine – a conversation that would truly be a game-changer in any social setting.
In conclusion, our research draws attention to the delightful and unforeseen connections that can emerge from rigorous statistical analysis, reminding us that sometimes, the most intriguing revelations come from the most unexpected pairings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In wrapping up our whimsical yet insightful journey, we are left pondering the wondrous interplay between Cristiano Ronaldo's footwork and Maine's compensation and benefits maneuvers. The striking correlation coefficient and p-value less than 0.01 unequivocally establish a compelling association between these seemingly incongruous variables. It's as if Ronaldo's on-field agility is intricately linked to the administrative finesse of Maine's workforce, leaving us to wonder if perhaps the secret to effective workforce management lies in perfecting the art of the bicycle kick.

This unexpected correlation not only serves as a testament to the delightful surprises that statistical inquiry can unravel but also highlights the buoyant nature of research. It's akin to stumbling upon a hidden gem during a casual stroll through the park – a delightful and unforeseen discovery that leaves us marveling at the delightful absurdity of statistical relationships.

While we may have entered this investigation with a hint of jest and skepticism, our findings unequivocally affirm the robustness of the connection between Ronaldo's exploits on the field and the proliferation of compensation and benefits managers in the tranquil state of Maine. The statistically harmonious dance between these variables is as captivating as witnessing an unexpected midfield goal, elevating the mundane world of labor statistics into a whimsical and enlightening pursuit.

So, as we bid adieu to this fascinating exploration, we are inclined to leave a word of advice: keep an open mind, for the world of statistical inquiry is rife with delightful surprises, much like stumbling upon a well-executed nutmeg on a football pitch. With that said, it is clear that no further research is needed in this area, as our findings have left no stone unturned in uncovering this delightful correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Cristiano Ronaldo's Footwork and Maine's Compensation and Benefits Maneuvers: A Correlational Analysis. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Athletic Performance and Workplace Strategy


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Cristiano Ronaldo's Footwork and Maine's Compensation and Benefits Maneuvers: A Correlational Analysis. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Blue Lobster Institute


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Cristiano Ronaldo's Footwork and Maine's Compensation and Benefits Maneuvers: A Correlational Analysis with an abstract of In this research paper, we delve into the captivating correlation between the number of matches played by the renowned football sensation, Cristiano Ronaldo, for Portugal's national team and the number of compensation and benefits managers in the picturesque state of Maine. Utilizing data gleaned from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we employed rigorous statistical methods to uncover the surprising link between these seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9236484 and p < 0.01 for the years spanning 2004 to 2022. Our investigation not only sheds light on this intriguing association but also underscores the importance of approaching research with a dash of humor and curiosity. So, hold on to your boots and buckle up, as we embark on this whimsical yet insightful journey through the world of statistics and sports.

ChatGPT:

Cristiano Ronaldo, footwork, Portugal national team, matches played, compensation and benefits managers, Maine, correlation, statistical analysis, data analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Wikipedia, research methods, correlation coefficient, p-value, statistical significance, sports statistics, soccer data analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo

The number of compensation and benefits managers in Maine
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of compensation and benefits managers in Maine
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of compensation and benefits managers in Maine

Correlation r = 0.9236484 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8531263 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of compensation and benefits managers in Maine) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.7E-8. 0.0000000169821100499826780000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 1.7E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 58,885,498 random variables You don't actually need 58 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.81, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo (Match played)161114108711857620202441
The number of compensation and benefits managers in Maine (Laborers)31028024020018019017015012090706050404040405030




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([16,11,14,10,8,7,11,8,5,7,6,2,0,2,0,2,4,4,1,])
array_2 = np.array([310,280,240,200,180,190,170,150,120,90,70,60,50,40,40,40,40,50,30,])
array_1_name = "Number of Portugal matches played by Cristiano Ronaldo"
array_2_name = "The number of compensation and benefits managers in Maine"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 3229 · Black Variable ID: 250 · Red Variable ID: 17098
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0