about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,225 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Fossil fuel use in Benin and the second variable is Total number of automotive recalls.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The Fossil fuel use in Benin has been revving up, leading to a surge in emissions. As a result, car manufacturers are feeling the pressure to recall more vehicles due to the smog-related issues. It seems like the situation is going from Benin to worse for the automotive industry. To address the problem, they may need to take a more exhaust-ive approach to vehicle production and maintenance.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a futuristic mechanic's workshop in Benin with high-tech tools and robotic arms performing tune-ups and repairs on cars. The workshop should be bustling with activity, showing cars lined up with their hoods open and mechanics wearing high-tech suits. The air is thick with smoke from exhausts, creating a contrast between the advanced technology and the environmental impact of increased fossil fuel use. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Fossil fuel use in Benin and Total number of automotive recalls. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Surrealism Cute 2D animation Brutalism inspired by bauhaus High-tech
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Fossil fuel use in Benin and Total number of automotive recalls, in the following situation: Because as the use of fossil fuels increased in Benin, more and more vehicles were powered by these fuels, leading to an uptick in automotive recalls. The increase in emissions from burning fossil fuels caused cars to develop a "bad exhaust" attitude, resulting in much needed time in the shop for a "tune-up." Additionally, the fossil fuel fumes may have led the cars to "crack a gasket" or experience "transmission confusion," necessitating recalls to fix these "fuelish" problems.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Benin, as the use of fossil fuels rose, so did the number of automotive recalls. A busy mechanic's workshop with cars lined up for tune-ups and repairs, with smoke from exhausts hanging thick in the air, depicts both the increase in fossil fuel use and the spike in automotive recalls caused by the "fuelish" problems.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In Benin, as the use of fossil fuels rose, so did the number of automotive recalls. A busy mechanic's workshop with cars lined up for tune-ups and repairs, with smoke from exhausts hanging thick in the air, depicts both the increase in fossil fuel use and the spike in automotive recalls caused by the "fuelish" problems. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a futuristic mechanic's workshop in Benin with high-tech tools and robotic arms performing tune-ups and repairs on cars. The workshop should be bustling with activity, showing cars lined up with their hoods open and mechanics wearing high-tech suits. The air is thick with smoke from exhausts, creating a contrast between the advanced technology and the environmental impact of increased fossil fuel use.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Fossil fuel use in Benin caused Total number of automotive recalls to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Fossil Fuel Folly: How Benin's Gasoline Use Fuels Automotive Recalls

The Journal of Ecological Economics and Sustainability

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Benin and Total number of automotive recalls. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9086277 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Fossil Fuel Folly: How Benin's Gasoline Use Fuels Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we rev up our engines and brake down the relationship between fossil fuel use in Benin and the total number of automotive recalls. Our research team has exhaustively examined data from the Energy Information Administration and the US DOT to analyze this burning question. We discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9086277, emphasizing the strong association between Benin's fossil fuel habits and the frequency of automotive recalls. Our findings not only pump the brakes on assumptions but also turbocharge the understanding of how gas guzzling in Benin reverberates through the automotive industry. So buckle up and join us on this wild and whimsical ride through the interplay of fossil fuel consumption and automotive recalls!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Benin and Total number of automotive recalls. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fossil Fuel Folly: How Benin's Gasoline Use Fuels Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we rev up our engines and brake down the relationship between fossil fuel use in Benin and the total number of automotive recalls. Our research team has exhaustively examined data from the Energy Information Administration and the US DOT to analyze this burning question. We discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9086277, emphasizing the strong association between Benin's fossil fuel habits and the frequency of automotive recalls. Our findings not only pump the brakes on assumptions but also turbocharge the understanding of how gas guzzling in Benin reverberates through the automotive industry. So buckle up and join us on this wild and whimsical ride through the interplay of fossil fuel consumption and automotive recalls!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As the old adage goes, "where there's smoke, there's fire." In the case of Benin's fervent consumption of fossil fuels, it seems that where there's gasoline, there's a flurry of automotive recalls. Much like a misfiring engine, this curious relationship between fossil fuel use in Benin and the total number of automotive recalls has sparked our interest and sent us on a wild research ride through the highways and byways of data analysis.

The intersection of fossil fuel consumption and automotive safety recalls may seem like an unlikely detour for academic inquiry, but rest assured, the road ahead is paved with compelling connections and unexpected twists. Just as a car relies on a harmonious combination of fuel, air, and spark to propel it forward, our study aims to uncover the intricate interplay between Benin's gasoline habits and the automotive industry's recall rollercoaster.

While others may see these findings as merely a series of statistical coincidences, we choose to view them as an opportunity for lighthearted exploration and whimsical wonder. So, fasten your seatbelts and adjust your rearview mirrors, because we're about to embark on a journey that's equal parts scholarly scrutiny and humorous hijinks.

In this study, we not only aim to pump the brakes on assumptions but also to rev up the understanding of how gas guzzling in Benin reverberates through the automotive industry, setting off alarms and flashing warning lights that demand attention. So, without further ado, let's buckle up and join us on this delightful and unconventional academic expedition into the world of fossil fuel folly and automotive recalls. Welcome to the intersection of data-driven analysis and a dash of academic amusement!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Benin and Total number of automotive recalls. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fossil Fuel Folly: How Benin's Gasoline Use Fuels Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we rev up our engines and brake down the relationship between fossil fuel use in Benin and the total number of automotive recalls. Our research team has exhaustively examined data from the Energy Information Administration and the US DOT to analyze this burning question. We discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9086277, emphasizing the strong association between Benin's fossil fuel habits and the frequency of automotive recalls. Our findings not only pump the brakes on assumptions but also turbocharge the understanding of how gas guzzling in Benin reverberates through the automotive industry. So buckle up and join us on this wild and whimsical ride through the interplay of fossil fuel consumption and automotive recalls!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the old adage goes, "where there's smoke, there's fire." In the case of Benin's fervent consumption of fossil fuels, it seems that where there's gasoline, there's a flurry of automotive recalls. Much like a misfiring engine, this curious relationship between fossil fuel use in Benin and the total number of automotive recalls has sparked our interest and sent us on a wild research ride through the highways and byways of data analysis.
The intersection of fossil fuel consumption and automotive safety recalls may seem like an unlikely detour for academic inquiry, but rest assured, the road ahead is paved with compelling connections and unexpected twists. Just as a car relies on a harmonious combination of fuel, air, and spark to propel it forward, our study aims to uncover the intricate interplay between Benin's gasoline habits and the automotive industry's recall rollercoaster.
While others may see these findings as merely a series of statistical coincidences, we choose to view them as an opportunity for lighthearted exploration and whimsical wonder. So, fasten your seatbelts and adjust your rearview mirrors, because we're about to embark on a journey that's equal parts scholarly scrutiny and humorous hijinks.
In this study, we not only aim to pump the brakes on assumptions but also to rev up the understanding of how gas guzzling in Benin reverberates through the automotive industry, setting off alarms and flashing warning lights that demand attention. So, without further ado, let's buckle up and join us on this delightful and unconventional academic expedition into the world of fossil fuel folly and automotive recalls. Welcome to the intersection of data-driven analysis and a dash of academic amusement!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The correlation between fossil fuel consumption and automotive safety recalls has been a subject of intense academic scrutiny. Smith et al. (2017) found a moderate positive relationship between gasoline usage in Benin and the frequency of automotive recalls. This study, while insightful, merely scratches the surface of this complex and multifaceted issue. Doe's comprehensive analysis in "Fueling the Fire: The Impact of Gasoline on Automotive Safety" delves deeper into the intricate dynamics at play, shedding light on the potential causal pathways between fossil fuel use and automotive recalls.

In a similar vein, Jones et al. (2015) explored the environmental and economic implications of fossil fuel dependence in "The Fuel Factor: Unraveling the Complexities of Gasoline Consumption." Their findings suggest that the ripple effects of gasoline consumption extend far beyond environmental concerns, with potential consequences for automotive safety standards and regulatory oversight.

Turning to non-fiction literature related to the automotive industry, "Recall Roulette: Navigating Automotive Safety in a Fast-Paced World" by Automotive Analyst et al. provides a comprehensive overview of the challenges and implications of automotive recalls. The book presents a sobering look at the high-stakes game of automotive safety, offering valuable insights into the factors that may contribute to the increasing frequency of recalls in a fossil fuel-driven world.

On a more creative note, the fictional work "Burning Rubber: A Tale of Gasoline and Recall Resilience" by Novelist X weaves a compelling narrative around the intertwined fates of a fuel-dependent society and the automotive industry. While purely speculative, the novel raises thought-provoking questions about the potential hidden forces driving the correlation between fossil fuel usage and automotive recalls.

In a lighthearted intersection of internet culture and automotive safety, the popular meme "Sudden Acceleration Sloth" humorously captures the unexpected twists and turns that can arise in the automotive world. Although seemingly unrelated, this meme serves as a reminder that even in the most serious of contexts, there is always room for a touch of levity and whimsy.

As we navigate through this literature review, it becomes evident that the relationship between fossil fuel use in Benin and the total number of automotive recalls is not merely a matter of statistical analyses and dry academic discourse. It is a landscape adorned with unexpected detours, hidden potholes, and the occasional comedic roadside attraction.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Benin and Total number of automotive recalls. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and US DOT . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fossil Fuel Folly: How Benin's Gasoline Use Fuels Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we rev up our engines and brake down the relationship between fossil fuel use in Benin and the total number of automotive recalls. Our research team has exhaustively examined data from the Energy Information Administration and the US DOT to analyze this burning question. We discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9086277, emphasizing the strong association between Benin's fossil fuel habits and the frequency of automotive recalls. Our findings not only pump the brakes on assumptions but also turbocharge the understanding of how gas guzzling in Benin reverberates through the automotive industry. So buckle up and join us on this wild and whimsical ride through the interplay of fossil fuel consumption and automotive recalls!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As the old adage goes, "where there's smoke, there's fire." In the case of Benin's fervent consumption of fossil fuels, it seems that where there's gasoline, there's a flurry of automotive recalls. Much like a misfiring engine, this curious relationship between fossil fuel use in Benin and the total number of automotive recalls has sparked our interest and sent us on a wild research ride through the highways and byways of data analysis.
The intersection of fossil fuel consumption and automotive safety recalls may seem like an unlikely detour for academic inquiry, but rest assured, the road ahead is paved with compelling connections and unexpected twists. Just as a car relies on a harmonious combination of fuel, air, and spark to propel it forward, our study aims to uncover the intricate interplay between Benin's gasoline habits and the automotive industry's recall rollercoaster.
While others may see these findings as merely a series of statistical coincidences, we choose to view them as an opportunity for lighthearted exploration and whimsical wonder. So, fasten your seatbelts and adjust your rearview mirrors, because we're about to embark on a journey that's equal parts scholarly scrutiny and humorous hijinks.
In this study, we not only aim to pump the brakes on assumptions but also to rev up the understanding of how gas guzzling in Benin reverberates through the automotive industry, setting off alarms and flashing warning lights that demand attention. So, without further ado, let's buckle up and join us on this delightful and unconventional academic expedition into the world of fossil fuel folly and automotive recalls. Welcome to the intersection of data-driven analysis and a dash of academic amusement!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the tangled web of fossil fuel usage in Benin and its impact on automotive recalls, we employed a whimsically diverse array of research methods. First and foremost, we unleashed our crack team of data wranglers to harness and corral information from the vast expanse of the internet. Our trusty steeds, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) and the US Department of Transportation (DOT) databases, served as our primary watering holes for quenching our thirst for data on fossil fuel consumption and the frequency of automotive recalls from 1980 to 2021.

With our data in hand, we revved up our analytical engines and embarked on a thrilling statistical joyride. We employed cutting-edge regression analyses, wielding the power of sophisticated statistical software to zoom through the data and uncover correlations with the precision of a high-performance sports car navigating a winding road. Our models were as meticulously tuned as a Formula 1 car, ensuring that our results were not derailed by confounding variables or spurious relationships.

In addition to the quantitative horsepower under our hood, we indulged in some qualitative explorations. We revved up our brainstorming engines and engaged in scholarly discussions and consultations with experts in the fields of automotive engineering, environmental science, and even a few eccentric petrolheads for a spirited exchange of ideas.

And let's not forget the cherry on top of our methodological sundae: a hearty dose of humor! We sprinkled our methodology with puns, jocular musings, and the occasional witty observation to drive home the point that academic inquiry can be both rigorous and entertaining.

In summary, our methodological approach can be likened to a road trip through uncharted territory — equal parts precision navigation and carefree exploration. Buckle up and brace yourself for a fun-filled ride through the methodology of our research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Benin and Total number of automotive recalls. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and US DOT .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9086277, r-squared of 0.8256043, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Fossil Fuel Folly: How Benin's Gasoline Use Fuels Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we rev up our engines and brake down the relationship between fossil fuel use in Benin and the total number of automotive recalls. Our research team has exhaustively examined data from the Energy Information Administration and the US DOT to analyze this burning question. We discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9086277, emphasizing the strong association between Benin's fossil fuel habits and the frequency of automotive recalls. Our findings not only pump the brakes on assumptions but also turbocharge the understanding of how gas guzzling in Benin reverberates through the automotive industry. So buckle up and join us on this wild and whimsical ride through the interplay of fossil fuel consumption and automotive recalls!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As the old adage goes, "where there's smoke, there's fire." In the case of Benin's fervent consumption of fossil fuels, it seems that where there's gasoline, there's a flurry of automotive recalls. Much like a misfiring engine, this curious relationship between fossil fuel use in Benin and the total number of automotive recalls has sparked our interest and sent us on a wild research ride through the highways and byways of data analysis.
The intersection of fossil fuel consumption and automotive safety recalls may seem like an unlikely detour for academic inquiry, but rest assured, the road ahead is paved with compelling connections and unexpected twists. Just as a car relies on a harmonious combination of fuel, air, and spark to propel it forward, our study aims to uncover the intricate interplay between Benin's gasoline habits and the automotive industry's recall rollercoaster.
While others may see these findings as merely a series of statistical coincidences, we choose to view them as an opportunity for lighthearted exploration and whimsical wonder. So, fasten your seatbelts and adjust your rearview mirrors, because we're about to embark on a journey that's equal parts scholarly scrutiny and humorous hijinks.
In this study, we not only aim to pump the brakes on assumptions but also to rev up the understanding of how gas guzzling in Benin reverberates through the automotive industry, setting off alarms and flashing warning lights that demand attention. So, without further ado, let's buckle up and join us on this delightful and unconventional academic expedition into the world of fossil fuel folly and automotive recalls. Welcome to the intersection of data-driven analysis and a dash of academic amusement!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the relationship between fossil fuel use in Benin and the total number of automotive recalls has taken us on a thrilling and turbocharged journey full of surprising twists and delightful discoveries. Rolling up our sleeves and delving into the data, we found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9086277, indicating a strong positive correlation between these two variables. In addition, the r-squared value of 0.8256043 suggests that a substantial proportion of the variation in automotive recalls can be explained by Benin's fossil fuel consumption. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our results provide robust evidence for the significance of this correlation.

Fig. 1, which we present here, illustrates the strong positive relationship between fossil fuel use in Benin and the total number of automotive recalls. This scatterplot graphically showcases the tight connection between these two variables, leaving little room for doubt regarding the influence of Benin's gasoline habits on the automotive industry's recall rollercoaster.

In sum, our findings not only put the pedal to the metal on assumptions about fossil fuel consumption but also ignite a newfound appreciation for the whimsical and unexpected ways in which these habits reverberate through the automotive industry. So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts as we navigate through the data-driven highways and byways of this delightful and unconventional academic safari into the world of fossil fuel folly and automotive recalls. Welcome to the exhilarating intersection of empirical evidence and a dash of academic amusement!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Benin and Total number of automotive recalls. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Fossil Fuel Folly: How Benin's Gasoline Use Fuels Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we rev up our engines and brake down the relationship between fossil fuel use in Benin and the total number of automotive recalls. Our research team has exhaustively examined data from the Energy Information Administration and the US DOT to analyze this burning question. We discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9086277, emphasizing the strong association between Benin's fossil fuel habits and the frequency of automotive recalls. Our findings not only pump the brakes on assumptions but also turbocharge the understanding of how gas guzzling in Benin reverberates through the automotive industry. So buckle up and join us on this wild and whimsical ride through the interplay of fossil fuel consumption and automotive recalls!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The correlation between fossil fuel consumption and automotive safety recalls has been a subject of intense academic scrutiny. Smith et al. (2017) found a moderate positive relationship between gasoline usage in Benin and the frequency of automotive recalls. This study, while insightful, merely scratches the surface of this complex and multifaceted issue. Doe's comprehensive analysis in "Fueling the Fire: The Impact of Gasoline on Automotive Safety" delves deeper into the intricate dynamics at play, shedding light on the potential causal pathways between fossil fuel use and automotive recalls.
In a similar vein, Jones et al. (2015) explored the environmental and economic implications of fossil fuel dependence in "The Fuel Factor: Unraveling the Complexities of Gasoline Consumption." Their findings suggest that the ripple effects of gasoline consumption extend far beyond environmental concerns, with potential consequences for automotive safety standards and regulatory oversight.
Turning to non-fiction literature related to the automotive industry, "Recall Roulette: Navigating Automotive Safety in a Fast-Paced World" by Automotive Analyst et al. provides a comprehensive overview of the challenges and implications of automotive recalls. The book presents a sobering look at the high-stakes game of automotive safety, offering valuable insights into the factors that may contribute to the increasing frequency of recalls in a fossil fuel-driven world.
On a more creative note, the fictional work "Burning Rubber: A Tale of Gasoline and Recall Resilience" by Novelist X weaves a compelling narrative around the intertwined fates of a fuel-dependent society and the automotive industry. While purely speculative, the novel raises thought-provoking questions about the potential hidden forces driving the correlation between fossil fuel usage and automotive recalls.
In a lighthearted intersection of internet culture and automotive safety, the popular meme "Sudden Acceleration Sloth" humorously captures the unexpected twists and turns that can arise in the automotive world. Although seemingly unrelated, this meme serves as a reminder that even in the most serious of contexts, there is always room for a touch of levity and whimsy.
As we navigate through this literature review, it becomes evident that the relationship between fossil fuel use in Benin and the total number of automotive recalls is not merely a matter of statistical analyses and dry academic discourse. It is a landscape adorned with unexpected detours, hidden potholes, and the occasional comedic roadside attraction.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between fossil fuel use in Benin and the total number of automotive recalls has taken us on a thrilling and turbocharged journey full of surprising twists and delightful discoveries. Rolling up our sleeves and delving into the data, we found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9086277, indicating a strong positive correlation between these two variables. In addition, the r-squared value of 0.8256043 suggests that a substantial proportion of the variation in automotive recalls can be explained by Benin's fossil fuel consumption. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our results provide robust evidence for the significance of this correlation.
Fig. 1, which we present here, illustrates the strong positive relationship between fossil fuel use in Benin and the total number of automotive recalls. This scatterplot graphically showcases the tight connection between these two variables, leaving little room for doubt regarding the influence of Benin's gasoline habits on the automotive industry's recall rollercoaster.
In sum, our findings not only put the pedal to the metal on assumptions about fossil fuel consumption but also ignite a newfound appreciation for the whimsical and unexpected ways in which these habits reverberate through the automotive industry. So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts as we navigate through the data-driven highways and byways of this delightful and unconventional academic safari into the world of fossil fuel folly and automotive recalls. Welcome to the exhilarating intersection of empirical evidence and a dash of academic amusement!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings shed light on the relationship between fossil fuel use in Benin and the total number of automotive recalls, confirming and extending the prior research in this whimsical and unexpected avenue of scholarly pursuit. Much like Novelist X's "Burning Rubber," our study has navigated the intricate paths of gasoline consumption and recall resilience, uncovering a fascinating correlation that fuels our understanding of this unconventional intersection.

First and foremost, our robust correlation coefficient of 0.9086277 turbocharges the existing literature by reaffirming the strong positive relationship between Benin's fuel habits and automotive recalls. This finding echoes the work of Smith et al. (2017) and Doe, elevating their earlier insights from mere scratches on the surface to full-blown tire tracks in the field of automotive research. The interconnectedness of gasoline consumption and automotive safety recalls becomes as clear as a windshield after a thorough wiper fluid spray.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8256043 underscores the substantial proportion of variation in automotive recalls that can be attributed to Benin's fossil fuel consumption, mirroring the magnitude of implications highlighted by Jones et al. (2015). Our study not only revs up the discussion of causal pathways but also fills the tank of knowledge regarding the nuanced environmental and economic impacts expounded upon by these prior works.

In a lighthearted nod to the "Sudden Acceleration Sloth," our results unexpectedly accelerate the understanding of the humorous detours and unpredictable twists within the automotive domain. Although it may seem like a comical meme, the surprising strength of our correlation coefficient and the p-value of less than 0.01 provide concrete evidence for the serious implications of our findings.

In conclusion, our study pumps the brakes on assumptions and accelerates the appreciation for the whimsical and unexpected ways in which Benin's gasoline habits reverberate through the automotive industry. Just like in "Recall Roulette," we've navigated the high-stakes game of automotive safety with a touch of levity and whimsy, showing that even in the most serious of contexts, there's room for joyous academic amusement. So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts as we journey further into the delightful and unconventional realm of fossil fuel folly and automotive recalls! This isn't just about data – it's about the turbocharged thrill of scholarly discovery.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Fossil fuel use in Benin and Total number of automotive recalls. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Fossil Fuel Folly: How Benin's Gasoline Use Fuels Automotive Recalls

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we rev up our engines and brake down the relationship between fossil fuel use in Benin and the total number of automotive recalls. Our research team has exhaustively examined data from the Energy Information Administration and the US DOT to analyze this burning question. We discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9086277, emphasizing the strong association between Benin's fossil fuel habits and the frequency of automotive recalls. Our findings not only pump the brakes on assumptions but also turbocharge the understanding of how gas guzzling in Benin reverberates through the automotive industry. So buckle up and join us on this wild and whimsical ride through the interplay of fossil fuel consumption and automotive recalls!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As the old adage goes, "where there's smoke, there's fire." In the case of Benin's fervent consumption of fossil fuels, it seems that where there's gasoline, there's a flurry of automotive recalls. Much like a misfiring engine, this curious relationship between fossil fuel use in Benin and the total number of automotive recalls has sparked our interest and sent us on a wild research ride through the highways and byways of data analysis.
The intersection of fossil fuel consumption and automotive safety recalls may seem like an unlikely detour for academic inquiry, but rest assured, the road ahead is paved with compelling connections and unexpected twists. Just as a car relies on a harmonious combination of fuel, air, and spark to propel it forward, our study aims to uncover the intricate interplay between Benin's gasoline habits and the automotive industry's recall rollercoaster.
While others may see these findings as merely a series of statistical coincidences, we choose to view them as an opportunity for lighthearted exploration and whimsical wonder. So, fasten your seatbelts and adjust your rearview mirrors, because we're about to embark on a journey that's equal parts scholarly scrutiny and humorous hijinks.
In this study, we not only aim to pump the brakes on assumptions but also to rev up the understanding of how gas guzzling in Benin reverberates through the automotive industry, setting off alarms and flashing warning lights that demand attention. So, without further ado, let's buckle up and join us on this delightful and unconventional academic expedition into the world of fossil fuel folly and automotive recalls. Welcome to the intersection of data-driven analysis and a dash of academic amusement!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between fossil fuel use in Benin and the total number of automotive recalls has taken us on a thrilling and turbocharged journey full of surprising twists and delightful discoveries. Rolling up our sleeves and delving into the data, we found a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9086277, indicating a strong positive correlation between these two variables. In addition, the r-squared value of 0.8256043 suggests that a substantial proportion of the variation in automotive recalls can be explained by Benin's fossil fuel consumption. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our results provide robust evidence for the significance of this correlation.
Fig. 1, which we present here, illustrates the strong positive relationship between fossil fuel use in Benin and the total number of automotive recalls. This scatterplot graphically showcases the tight connection between these two variables, leaving little room for doubt regarding the influence of Benin's gasoline habits on the automotive industry's recall rollercoaster.
In sum, our findings not only put the pedal to the metal on assumptions about fossil fuel consumption but also ignite a newfound appreciation for the whimsical and unexpected ways in which these habits reverberate through the automotive industry. So, dear readers, fasten your seatbelts as we navigate through the data-driven highways and byways of this delightful and unconventional academic safari into the world of fossil fuel folly and automotive recalls. Welcome to the exhilarating intersection of empirical evidence and a dash of academic amusement!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has driven home the point that Benin's fossil fuel folly is no laughing matter when it comes to its impact on the automotive industry. Our findings have revved up the understanding of the intricate relationship between gasoline consumption and the frequency of automotive recalls, shedding light on the unexpected ways in which Benin's gas guzzling reverberates through the automotive world.

As we shift gears towards the finish line, it's clear that this correlation is not just a pit stop on the road to discovery; it's a full-throttle revelation that demands attention. Our study has put the pedal to the metal on assumptions and turbocharged the understanding of this unusual intersection, proving that the connection between fossil fuel use in Benin and automotive recalls is more than just a quirky coincidence – it's a statistical phenomenon with a sense of humor.

So, as we park this research in the proverbial academic garage, it's safe to say that no more research is needed in this area. Our findings have taken us on a wild and whimsical ride through the world of fossil fuel folly and automotive recalls, and it's time to sit back, relax, and enjoy the view from the finish line. After all, in this exhilarating intersection of empirical evidence and academic amusement, the journey has been just as delightful as the destination!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Fossil Fuel Folly: How Benin's Gasoline Use Fuels Automotive Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Economics and Sustainability


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Fossil Fuel Folly: How Benin's Gasoline Use Fuels Automotive Recalls. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Sustainable Energy Solutions and Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Fossil Fuel Folly: How Benin's Gasoline Use Fuels Automotive Recalls with an abstract of In this study, we rev up our engines and brake down the relationship between fossil fuel use in Benin and the total number of automotive recalls. Our research team has exhaustively examined data from the Energy Information Administration and the US DOT to analyze this burning question. We discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9086277, emphasizing the strong association between Benin's fossil fuel habits and the frequency of automotive recalls. Our findings not only pump the brakes on assumptions but also turbocharge the understanding of how gas guzzling in Benin reverberates through the automotive industry. So buckle up and join us on this wild and whimsical ride through the interplay of fossil fuel consumption and automotive recalls!

ChatGPT:

Fossil fuel consumption, Benin, gasoline use, automotive recalls, correlation coefficient, Energy Information Administration, US DOT, gas guzzling, automotive industry, fossil fuel habits, fuel consumption data

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Fossil fuel use in Benin
Detailed data title: Total fossil fuel use in Benin in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Fossil fuel use in Benin

Total number of automotive recalls
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Total number of automotive recalls

Correlation r = 0.9086277 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8256043 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Total number of automotive recalls) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Fossil fuel use in Benin) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.3E-17. 0.0000000000000000929752442730
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 9.3E-15% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 10,755,551,198,808,734 random variables You don't actually need 10 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.84, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Fossil fuel use in Benin (Billion kWh)0.0050.0050.0050.0050.0050.0050.0050.0050.0050.0050.0190.0220.0230.0240.0480.0290.0470.050.0580.0660.077080.060160.057340.073320.07520.099640.1410.203980.212440.119380.107160.094940.045120.086480.224660.304560.250040.30550.185180.193640.219020.233037
Total number of automotive recalls (Recalls)220197174182209227219252241281270281217264288357341318413444621559510600699645613713780570722655661710869971103189710329638831093




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.005,0.005,0.005,0.005,0.005,0.005,0.005,0.005,0.005,0.005,0.019,0.022,0.023,0.024,0.048,0.029,0.047,0.05,0.058,0.066,0.07708,0.06016,0.05734,0.07332,0.0752,0.09964,0.141,0.20398,0.21244,0.11938,0.10716,0.09494,0.04512,0.08648,0.22466,0.30456,0.25004,0.3055,0.18518,0.19364,0.21902,0.233037,])
array_2 = np.array([220,197,174,182,209,227,219,252,241,281,270,281,217,264,288,357,341,318,413,444,621,559,510,600,699,645,613,713,780,570,722,655,661,710,869,971,1031,897,1032,963,883,1093,])
array_1_name = "Fossil fuel use in Benin"
array_2_name = "Total number of automotive recalls"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 3225 · Black Variable ID: 23517 · Red Variable ID: 1116
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0