about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,222 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Associates degrees awarded in Physical sciences and the second variable is The number of statisticians in Michigan.  The chart goes from 2011 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of Associates degrees in Physical sciences rose, it created a positive feedback loop for statisticians in Michigan. These graduates were so adept at handling data, they were the missing piece to solving the statistical conundrums in the state. It's like they say, when it comes to number crunching, the influence of these physical science grads was exponential!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: ![Cute 2D animation of physical science graduates and statisticians](https://dalle-3-images.s3.amazonaws.com/8c18c2e3ffbe3f13e574e9d5e30854eb) Description: In the dimly lit laboratory, a group of adorable 2D animated physical science graduates are wearing graduation gowns and holding their newly awarded Associate's degrees. They stand in a circle, their cute, determined expressions radiating determination as they concentrate. Their combined energy creates a shimmering, glowing portal. Through it, adorable statisticians from all over Michigan start appearing, drawn by the mysterious call of the League of Statisticians. The room fills with the sound of excited chatter as the newly arrived statisticians are welcomed into the secret society. The scene is heartwarming and filled with a sense of wonder and inclusion. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Associates degrees awarded in Physical sciences and The number of statisticians in Michigan. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Pop art Steampunk Macabre Cute 2D animation a meme
ChatGPT: Cute 2D animation

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Associates degrees awarded in Physical sciences and The number of statisticians in Michigan, in the following situation: As more physical scientists graduated with their Associate's degrees, they formed a secret society called the "League of Statisticians" and used their newfound knowledge of physics to manipulate probability and summon more statisticians to join their ranks in Michigan.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a dimly lit laboratory, a group of physical science graduates, wearing graduation gowns and holding their newly awarded Associate's degrees, stand in a circle, their hands joined. With determined expressions, they concentrate as their combined energy creates a shimmering portal. Through it, statisticians from all over Michigan start appearing, drawn by the mysterious call of the League of Statisticians. The room fills with the sound of excited chatter as the newly arrived statisticians are welcomed into the secret society.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cute 2D animation ] and depicting this scene: In a dimly lit laboratory, a group of physical science graduates, wearing graduation gowns and holding their newly awarded Associate's degrees, stand in a circle, their hands joined. With determined expressions, they concentrate as their combined energy creates a shimmering portal. Through it, statisticians from all over Michigan start appearing, drawn by the mysterious call of the League of Statisticians. The room fills with the sound of excited chatter as the newly arrived statisticians are welcomed into the secret society. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: ![Cute 2D animation of physical science graduates and statisticians](https://dalle-3-images.s3.amazonaws.com/8c18c2e3ffbe3f13e574e9d5e30854eb) Description: In the dimly lit laboratory, a group of adorable 2D animated physical science graduates are wearing graduation gowns and holding their newly awarded Associate's degrees. They stand in a circle, their cute, determined expressions radiating determination as they concentrate. Their combined energy creates a shimmering, glowing portal. Through it, adorable statisticians from all over Michigan start appearing, drawn by the mysterious call of the League of Statisticians. The room fills with the sound of excited chatter as the newly arrived statisticians are welcomed into the secret society. The scene is heartwarming and filled with a sense of wonder and inclusion.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Associates degrees awarded in Physical sciences caused The number of statisticians in Michigan to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Degrees of Data: Exploring the Statistical Relationship Between Physical Sciences Associates Degrees and Statisticians in Michigan

The Journal of Statistical Connections

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Physical sciences and The number of statisticians in Michigan. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8576431 and p < 0.01 for 2011 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Degrees of Data: Exploring the Statistical Relationship Between Physical Sciences Associates Degrees and Statisticians in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the fascinating connection between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Physical sciences and the abundance of statisticians in the great state of Michigan. With a keen eye for numerical analysis and a dash of statistical humor, we sought to unveil the nuanced interplay between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. After meticulously combing through data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8576431 and a significant p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021. It seems that as the number of Physical sciences degrees awarded rose, so did the population of statisticians in Michigan - a correlation that's as clear as 20/20 vision.

But before you start picturing a sunny statistical utopia, it's important to note that correlation does not imply causation - or, as we like to say in the stats world, "just because two variables move together, doesn't mean one causes the other... unless they're conjoined twins!" Our findings not only shed light on this quirky relationship, but also invite further exploration into the underlying factors driving this statistical camaraderie. So, whether you're pondering the statistical significance of Physical sciences degrees or musing about Michigan's mathematicians, remember: keep your data correlated and your jokes perfectly linear!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Physical sciences and The number of statisticians in Michigan. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Degrees of Data: Exploring the Statistical Relationship Between Physical Sciences Associates Degrees and Statisticians in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the fascinating connection between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Physical sciences and the abundance of statisticians in the great state of Michigan. With a keen eye for numerical analysis and a dash of statistical humor, we sought to unveil the nuanced interplay between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. After meticulously combing through data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8576431 and a significant p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021. It seems that as the number of Physical sciences degrees awarded rose, so did the population of statisticians in Michigan - a correlation that's as clear as 20/20 vision.

But before you start picturing a sunny statistical utopia, it's important to note that correlation does not imply causation - or, as we like to say in the stats world, "just because two variables move together, doesn't mean one causes the other... unless they're conjoined twins!" Our findings not only shed light on this quirky relationship, but also invite further exploration into the underlying factors driving this statistical camaraderie. So, whether you're pondering the statistical significance of Physical sciences degrees or musing about Michigan's mathematicians, remember: keep your data correlated and your jokes perfectly linear!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of statistics is no stranger to uncovering hidden connections, but the link between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Physical sciences and the abundance of statisticians in Michigan may seem like an unlikely match made in numerical heaven. As we embark on this statistical adventure, we are reminded of the wise words of Sir Arthur Eddington: "Not only is the universe stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine." And indeed, the statistical landscape we are about to explore may just prove to be as unexpected as a black hole in a data set. But fear not, fellow researchers and statistical enthusiasts, for in the midst of numbers and equations, we shall not lose sight of the humor and wit that make our journey all the more enjoyable.

First, let us pause for a moment to appreciate the beauty of statistics - a field where "mean" is not just a mathematical concept, but also a reminder to be kind, and where "outliers" are not just data points, but individuals who dare to defy the norm. Embracing the spirit of levity that characterizes our statistical inquiry, we will undoubtedly encounter some unexpected findings along the way. After all, as esteemed statistician Ronald Fisher once quipped, "To call in the statistician after the experiment is done may be no more than asking him to perform a post-mortem examination: he may be able to say what the experiment died of."

Now, returning to the matter at hand, the relationship between the number of Physical sciences degrees awarded and the population of statisticians in Michigan presents an intriguing puzzle, one that may hold the key to understanding the dynamics of educational and occupational trends. Before we dive headfirst into the sea of data, let us take a moment to appreciate the subtle irony that lies in our investigation – the quest to make sense of complexity through the elegant simplicity of numbers. As we embark on this statistical escapade, let us heed the words of the great Robert Heinlein: "It's a scientific fact that your body will not absorb cholesterol if you take it from another person's plate. Discovering this, we also found out that statistics are as easy to fudge as any other."

Armed with mathematical rigor and a healthy dose of humor, we are poised to unravel the mysteries that await us in the correlation between Physical sciences degrees and the community of statisticians in Michigan. So, as we set sail on this statistical odyssey, remember to always keep a keen eye on the data - and perhaps a dad joke or two close at hand!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Physical sciences and The number of statisticians in Michigan. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Degrees of Data: Exploring the Statistical Relationship Between Physical Sciences Associates Degrees and Statisticians in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the fascinating connection between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Physical sciences and the abundance of statisticians in the great state of Michigan. With a keen eye for numerical analysis and a dash of statistical humor, we sought to unveil the nuanced interplay between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. After meticulously combing through data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8576431 and a significant p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021. It seems that as the number of Physical sciences degrees awarded rose, so did the population of statisticians in Michigan - a correlation that's as clear as 20/20 vision.

But before you start picturing a sunny statistical utopia, it's important to note that correlation does not imply causation - or, as we like to say in the stats world, "just because two variables move together, doesn't mean one causes the other... unless they're conjoined twins!" Our findings not only shed light on this quirky relationship, but also invite further exploration into the underlying factors driving this statistical camaraderie. So, whether you're pondering the statistical significance of Physical sciences degrees or musing about Michigan's mathematicians, remember: keep your data correlated and your jokes perfectly linear!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of statistics is no stranger to uncovering hidden connections, but the link between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Physical sciences and the abundance of statisticians in Michigan may seem like an unlikely match made in numerical heaven. As we embark on this statistical adventure, we are reminded of the wise words of Sir Arthur Eddington: "Not only is the universe stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine." And indeed, the statistical landscape we are about to explore may just prove to be as unexpected as a black hole in a data set. But fear not, fellow researchers and statistical enthusiasts, for in the midst of numbers and equations, we shall not lose sight of the humor and wit that make our journey all the more enjoyable.
First, let us pause for a moment to appreciate the beauty of statistics - a field where "mean" is not just a mathematical concept, but also a reminder to be kind, and where "outliers" are not just data points, but individuals who dare to defy the norm. Embracing the spirit of levity that characterizes our statistical inquiry, we will undoubtedly encounter some unexpected findings along the way. After all, as esteemed statistician Ronald Fisher once quipped, "To call in the statistician after the experiment is done may be no more than asking him to perform a post-mortem examination: he may be able to say what the experiment died of."
Now, returning to the matter at hand, the relationship between the number of Physical sciences degrees awarded and the population of statisticians in Michigan presents an intriguing puzzle, one that may hold the key to understanding the dynamics of educational and occupational trends. Before we dive headfirst into the sea of data, let us take a moment to appreciate the subtle irony that lies in our investigation – the quest to make sense of complexity through the elegant simplicity of numbers. As we embark on this statistical escapade, let us heed the words of the great Robert Heinlein: "It's a scientific fact that your body will not absorb cholesterol if you take it from another person's plate. Discovering this, we also found out that statistics are as easy to fudge as any other."
Armed with mathematical rigor and a healthy dose of humor, we are poised to unravel the mysteries that await us in the correlation between Physical sciences degrees and the community of statisticians in Michigan. So, as we set sail on this statistical odyssey, remember to always keep a keen eye on the data - and perhaps a dad joke or two close at hand!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find a positive correlation between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Physical sciences and the abundance of statisticians in Michigan. This study contributes to the growing body of literature exploring the interplay between educational trends and occupational dynamics, shedding light on the potential link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.

But before we dive into the statistical nitty-gritty, let's take a moment to appreciate the punny side of science. Why did the statistician break up with the mathematician? Because they found someone who could graph better! Now, back to the serious stuff.

In "Doe et al.," the authors delve into the implications of educational attainment in the physical sciences on the labor market, highlighting the potential influence of such degrees on career pathways in quantitative fields. This study prompts us to ponder the age-old question: why did the statistician go to art school? To study the significance of abstract data visualization!

An exploration of this nature prompts us to consider the broader context of statistical analysis and its diverse applications. So, what do you get when you cross a statistician with a magician? A probability distribution!

Now, turning our attention to the literature that informs our understanding of the physical sciences, we encounter real non-fiction books such as "The Fabric of the Cosmos" by Brian Greene and "A Brief History of Time" by Stephen Hawking, which delve into the mysteries of the universe and the fundamental principles of physics. And speaking of fundamental principles, remember that one about never trusting an atom? They make up everything!

Adding a touch of fiction to our literary landscape, we can draw parallels to "The Martian" by Andy Weir and "Contact" by Carl Sagan, which offer imaginative portrayals of scientific exploration and discovery. And just like these fictional adventures, our statistical inquiry may uncover unexpected twists and turns that rival the plot of a best-selling novel.

In between our scholarly pursuits, let's not forget the whimsical world of children's television shows, where "Bill Nye the Science Guy" and "The Magic School Bus" stimulate young minds to embrace the wonders of science. After all, statistical analysis is not just about numbers; it's also about nurturing a spirit of curiosity and wonder. And why did the statistics teacher only drink flat soda? She lost her fizz!

As we navigate through the scholarly literature, popular science books, and cultural references that intersect with our investigation, let us approach our statistical analysis with the gravity of esteemed researchers and the levity of a well-timed dad joke. After all, in the world of statistics, a little humor goes a long way in making sense of the numbers. So, with our metaphorical lab coats donned and our statistical tools at the ready, let the exploration of this peculiar correlation commence!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Physical sciences and The number of statisticians in Michigan. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2011 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Degrees of Data: Exploring the Statistical Relationship Between Physical Sciences Associates Degrees and Statisticians in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the fascinating connection between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Physical sciences and the abundance of statisticians in the great state of Michigan. With a keen eye for numerical analysis and a dash of statistical humor, we sought to unveil the nuanced interplay between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. After meticulously combing through data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8576431 and a significant p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021. It seems that as the number of Physical sciences degrees awarded rose, so did the population of statisticians in Michigan - a correlation that's as clear as 20/20 vision.

But before you start picturing a sunny statistical utopia, it's important to note that correlation does not imply causation - or, as we like to say in the stats world, "just because two variables move together, doesn't mean one causes the other... unless they're conjoined twins!" Our findings not only shed light on this quirky relationship, but also invite further exploration into the underlying factors driving this statistical camaraderie. So, whether you're pondering the statistical significance of Physical sciences degrees or musing about Michigan's mathematicians, remember: keep your data correlated and your jokes perfectly linear!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of statistics is no stranger to uncovering hidden connections, but the link between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Physical sciences and the abundance of statisticians in Michigan may seem like an unlikely match made in numerical heaven. As we embark on this statistical adventure, we are reminded of the wise words of Sir Arthur Eddington: "Not only is the universe stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine." And indeed, the statistical landscape we are about to explore may just prove to be as unexpected as a black hole in a data set. But fear not, fellow researchers and statistical enthusiasts, for in the midst of numbers and equations, we shall not lose sight of the humor and wit that make our journey all the more enjoyable.
First, let us pause for a moment to appreciate the beauty of statistics - a field where "mean" is not just a mathematical concept, but also a reminder to be kind, and where "outliers" are not just data points, but individuals who dare to defy the norm. Embracing the spirit of levity that characterizes our statistical inquiry, we will undoubtedly encounter some unexpected findings along the way. After all, as esteemed statistician Ronald Fisher once quipped, "To call in the statistician after the experiment is done may be no more than asking him to perform a post-mortem examination: he may be able to say what the experiment died of."
Now, returning to the matter at hand, the relationship between the number of Physical sciences degrees awarded and the population of statisticians in Michigan presents an intriguing puzzle, one that may hold the key to understanding the dynamics of educational and occupational trends. Before we dive headfirst into the sea of data, let us take a moment to appreciate the subtle irony that lies in our investigation – the quest to make sense of complexity through the elegant simplicity of numbers. As we embark on this statistical escapade, let us heed the words of the great Robert Heinlein: "It's a scientific fact that your body will not absorb cholesterol if you take it from another person's plate. Discovering this, we also found out that statistics are as easy to fudge as any other."
Armed with mathematical rigor and a healthy dose of humor, we are poised to unravel the mysteries that await us in the correlation between Physical sciences degrees and the community of statisticians in Michigan. So, as we set sail on this statistical odyssey, remember to always keep a keen eye on the data - and perhaps a dad joke or two close at hand!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unearth the statistical relationship between the number of Associates degrees awarded in Physical sciences and the population of statisticians in the delightful state of Michigan, our research team embarked on a journey akin to traversing a multidimensional space-time continuum. We harnessed the power of data collection from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, akin to wielding the infinity stones to uncover the elusive statistical equilibrium.

First, we set our sights on the collection of data pertaining to the number of Associate degrees awarded in Physical sciences in Michigan from 2011 to 2021. As the data flowed in like a particle in quantum entanglement, we meticulously curated and sorted it, ensuring that each data point was as pristine as a perfectly controlled experiment.

We then navigated through the cyber expanse to gather information on the population of statisticians in Michigan during the same period. The urge to compare these two distinct phenomena was as compelling as a magnetic force pulling our statistical compass towards uncharted territories.

Making use of the nuanced art of statistical inference, we employed advanced computational algorithms to analyze the collected data. Our statistical models shimmered with the elegance of a well-crafted equation, as we leveraged the interplay of correlation coefficients and significance levels to unravel the hidden connections.

Utilizing time series analysis techniques, we danced through the data points with the agility of a particle in Brownian motion, capturing the temporal dynamics of both physical sciences degrees and the cohort of statisticians in Michigan. This approach allowed us not only to observe the general trends over time, but also to capture any subtle fluctuations that may have occurred.

In a bid to ensure the robustness of our findings, we conducted sensitivity analyses and checked for potential confounding variables with the thoroughness of a detective investigating a case. We scrutinized our statistical models, ensuring that they were as resilient as a spacecraft navigating the asteroid belt of data uncertainties.

We then employed a host of statistical tests, ranging from t-tests to chi-square tests, to not only uncover any relationships but also to confirm the strength and direction of these connections. As we delved deeper into our data, we embraced the statistical uncertainty with the same composure as a scientist handling a bubbling beaker in a lab experiment.

In the spirit of embracing the unexpected, we also conducted a series of robustness checks using alternative statistical methodologies, including bootstrapping and Monte Carlo simulations. This allowed us to transcend the limitations of traditional statistical approaches and venture into a realm where statistical significance met the whimsy of chance.

To honor the spirit of statistical discovery, we continuously validated our results with the same fervor as a scientist replicating a groundbreaking experiment. Our statistical journey was not merely about uncovering relationships but also about celebrating the harmonious melody that emerges when data and analysis dance in perfect unison. And as we traversed the statistical landscape, we couldn't help but muse: "Why did the statistician become a weary gardener? Because he became tired of the arbitrary nature of his root-vegetable experiments!"

Lastly, to ensure transparency and reproducibility, we made all our data sources, statistical codes, and analytical methods available for scrutiny, akin to laying bare the inner workings of a statistical symphony. This not only reinforced the credibility of our findings but also invited fellow researchers to partake in the statistical revelry.

In summary, our methodology was as meticulous as a skilled artisan carving a masterpiece, with each statistical puzzle piece aligned to reveal the larger picture. Our statistical odyssey was not just an exploration of numbers and relationships but a celebration of the boundless wonders that unfold when science, data, and a touch of humor converge. So, as we charted this statistical voyage, we couldn't help but ponder: "Why was the statistical hypothesis so hesitant? It always had a standard error about whether to reject the null, but in the end, it always found its confidence interval!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Physical sciences and The number of statisticians in Michigan. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2011 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8576431, r-squared of 0.7355518, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Degrees of Data: Exploring the Statistical Relationship Between Physical Sciences Associates Degrees and Statisticians in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the fascinating connection between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Physical sciences and the abundance of statisticians in the great state of Michigan. With a keen eye for numerical analysis and a dash of statistical humor, we sought to unveil the nuanced interplay between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. After meticulously combing through data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8576431 and a significant p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021. It seems that as the number of Physical sciences degrees awarded rose, so did the population of statisticians in Michigan - a correlation that's as clear as 20/20 vision.

But before you start picturing a sunny statistical utopia, it's important to note that correlation does not imply causation - or, as we like to say in the stats world, "just because two variables move together, doesn't mean one causes the other... unless they're conjoined twins!" Our findings not only shed light on this quirky relationship, but also invite further exploration into the underlying factors driving this statistical camaraderie. So, whether you're pondering the statistical significance of Physical sciences degrees or musing about Michigan's mathematicians, remember: keep your data correlated and your jokes perfectly linear!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of statistics is no stranger to uncovering hidden connections, but the link between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Physical sciences and the abundance of statisticians in Michigan may seem like an unlikely match made in numerical heaven. As we embark on this statistical adventure, we are reminded of the wise words of Sir Arthur Eddington: "Not only is the universe stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine." And indeed, the statistical landscape we are about to explore may just prove to be as unexpected as a black hole in a data set. But fear not, fellow researchers and statistical enthusiasts, for in the midst of numbers and equations, we shall not lose sight of the humor and wit that make our journey all the more enjoyable.
First, let us pause for a moment to appreciate the beauty of statistics - a field where "mean" is not just a mathematical concept, but also a reminder to be kind, and where "outliers" are not just data points, but individuals who dare to defy the norm. Embracing the spirit of levity that characterizes our statistical inquiry, we will undoubtedly encounter some unexpected findings along the way. After all, as esteemed statistician Ronald Fisher once quipped, "To call in the statistician after the experiment is done may be no more than asking him to perform a post-mortem examination: he may be able to say what the experiment died of."
Now, returning to the matter at hand, the relationship between the number of Physical sciences degrees awarded and the population of statisticians in Michigan presents an intriguing puzzle, one that may hold the key to understanding the dynamics of educational and occupational trends. Before we dive headfirst into the sea of data, let us take a moment to appreciate the subtle irony that lies in our investigation – the quest to make sense of complexity through the elegant simplicity of numbers. As we embark on this statistical escapade, let us heed the words of the great Robert Heinlein: "It's a scientific fact that your body will not absorb cholesterol if you take it from another person's plate. Discovering this, we also found out that statistics are as easy to fudge as any other."
Armed with mathematical rigor and a healthy dose of humor, we are poised to unravel the mysteries that await us in the correlation between Physical sciences degrees and the community of statisticians in Michigan. So, as we set sail on this statistical odyssey, remember to always keep a keen eye on the data - and perhaps a dad joke or two close at hand!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between the number of Physical sciences Associate degrees awarded and the population of statisticians in Michigan revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8576431. This strong positive correlation defies the stereotypical perception of statisticians as dispassionate number crunchers, as it seems they have quite an affinity for the physical sciences. Perhaps they are just trying to add some "dimension" to their field!

The r-squared value of 0.7355518 indicates that a substantial portion of the variability in the number of statisticians in Michigan can be explained by the number of Physical sciences Associate degrees awarded. It's almost as if statisticians in Michigan are saying, "Hey, we can't resist the allure of physical sciences - we're drawn to those significant digits!"

The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this relationship. The evidence is as clear as a perfectly normal distribution - there is indeed a compelling association between the two variables.

Upon visual inspection, the scatterplot (see Fig. 1) illustrates the compelling linear relationship between Physical sciences Associate degrees awarded and the number of statisticians in Michigan. It's as if the data points are charting a course for a statistically significant journey, navigating the seas of science and statistics together.

Our findings provide valuable insight into the coalescence of educational and occupational trends. The statistics seem to suggest that as the number of Physical sciences degrees awarded rose, so did the population of statisticians in Michigan. It's as if a statistical symbiosis is at play, with each variable influencing the other in a harmonious numerical dance.

However, as with any statistical analysis, it's crucial to remember that correlation does not imply causation. The association we uncovered should not lead us to jump to conclusions about causality. As the wise statisticians say, "Correlation is not causation - unless you're determining the impact of caffeine on statistical productivity. Then we're brewing up some strong causation!"

In conclusion, our study has elucidated a compelling statistical relationship between the number of Physical sciences Associate degrees awarded and the population of statisticians in Michigan. These findings not only highlight the interconnectedness of educational and occupational domains but also showcase the quirky, yet captivating, side of statistical analysis. So, whether you're crunching numbers or decoding data, remember to keep a keen eye on those correlations and... maybe throw in a dad joke or two for good measure!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Physical sciences and The number of statisticians in Michigan. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Degrees of Data: Exploring the Statistical Relationship Between Physical Sciences Associates Degrees and Statisticians in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the fascinating connection between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Physical sciences and the abundance of statisticians in the great state of Michigan. With a keen eye for numerical analysis and a dash of statistical humor, we sought to unveil the nuanced interplay between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. After meticulously combing through data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8576431 and a significant p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021. It seems that as the number of Physical sciences degrees awarded rose, so did the population of statisticians in Michigan - a correlation that's as clear as 20/20 vision.

But before you start picturing a sunny statistical utopia, it's important to note that correlation does not imply causation - or, as we like to say in the stats world, "just because two variables move together, doesn't mean one causes the other... unless they're conjoined twins!" Our findings not only shed light on this quirky relationship, but also invite further exploration into the underlying factors driving this statistical camaraderie. So, whether you're pondering the statistical significance of Physical sciences degrees or musing about Michigan's mathematicians, remember: keep your data correlated and your jokes perfectly linear!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find a positive correlation between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Physical sciences and the abundance of statisticians in Michigan. This study contributes to the growing body of literature exploring the interplay between educational trends and occupational dynamics, shedding light on the potential link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena.
But before we dive into the statistical nitty-gritty, let's take a moment to appreciate the punny side of science. Why did the statistician break up with the mathematician? Because they found someone who could graph better! Now, back to the serious stuff.
In "Doe et al.," the authors delve into the implications of educational attainment in the physical sciences on the labor market, highlighting the potential influence of such degrees on career pathways in quantitative fields. This study prompts us to ponder the age-old question: why did the statistician go to art school? To study the significance of abstract data visualization!
An exploration of this nature prompts us to consider the broader context of statistical analysis and its diverse applications. So, what do you get when you cross a statistician with a magician? A probability distribution!
Now, turning our attention to the literature that informs our understanding of the physical sciences, we encounter real non-fiction books such as "The Fabric of the Cosmos" by Brian Greene and "A Brief History of Time" by Stephen Hawking, which delve into the mysteries of the universe and the fundamental principles of physics. And speaking of fundamental principles, remember that one about never trusting an atom? They make up everything!
Adding a touch of fiction to our literary landscape, we can draw parallels to "The Martian" by Andy Weir and "Contact" by Carl Sagan, which offer imaginative portrayals of scientific exploration and discovery. And just like these fictional adventures, our statistical inquiry may uncover unexpected twists and turns that rival the plot of a best-selling novel.
In between our scholarly pursuits, let's not forget the whimsical world of children's television shows, where "Bill Nye the Science Guy" and "The Magic School Bus" stimulate young minds to embrace the wonders of science. After all, statistical analysis is not just about numbers; it's also about nurturing a spirit of curiosity and wonder. And why did the statistics teacher only drink flat soda? She lost her fizz!
As we navigate through the scholarly literature, popular science books, and cultural references that intersect with our investigation, let us approach our statistical analysis with the gravity of esteemed researchers and the levity of a well-timed dad joke. After all, in the world of statistics, a little humor goes a long way in making sense of the numbers. So, with our metaphorical lab coats donned and our statistical tools at the ready, let the exploration of this peculiar correlation commence!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of Physical sciences Associate degrees awarded and the population of statisticians in Michigan revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8576431. This strong positive correlation defies the stereotypical perception of statisticians as dispassionate number crunchers, as it seems they have quite an affinity for the physical sciences. Perhaps they are just trying to add some "dimension" to their field!
The r-squared value of 0.7355518 indicates that a substantial portion of the variability in the number of statisticians in Michigan can be explained by the number of Physical sciences Associate degrees awarded. It's almost as if statisticians in Michigan are saying, "Hey, we can't resist the allure of physical sciences - we're drawn to those significant digits!"
The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this relationship. The evidence is as clear as a perfectly normal distribution - there is indeed a compelling association between the two variables.
Upon visual inspection, the scatterplot (see Fig. 1) illustrates the compelling linear relationship between Physical sciences Associate degrees awarded and the number of statisticians in Michigan. It's as if the data points are charting a course for a statistically significant journey, navigating the seas of science and statistics together.
Our findings provide valuable insight into the coalescence of educational and occupational trends. The statistics seem to suggest that as the number of Physical sciences degrees awarded rose, so did the population of statisticians in Michigan. It's as if a statistical symbiosis is at play, with each variable influencing the other in a harmonious numerical dance.
However, as with any statistical analysis, it's crucial to remember that correlation does not imply causation. The association we uncovered should not lead us to jump to conclusions about causality. As the wise statisticians say, "Correlation is not causation - unless you're determining the impact of caffeine on statistical productivity. Then we're brewing up some strong causation!"
In conclusion, our study has elucidated a compelling statistical relationship between the number of Physical sciences Associate degrees awarded and the population of statisticians in Michigan. These findings not only highlight the interconnectedness of educational and occupational domains but also showcase the quirky, yet captivating, side of statistical analysis. So, whether you're crunching numbers or decoding data, remember to keep a keen eye on those correlations and... maybe throw in a dad joke or two for good measure!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have unearthed a compelling correlation between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Physical sciences and the population of statisticians in Michigan, seemingly encapsulating a true "statistical romance" between these seemingly unrelated domains. With a correlation coefficient of 0.8576431 and a p-value less than 0.01, the statistical significance of this connection cannot be understated. It seems that as the number of Physical sciences degrees awarded rose, so did the population of statisticians in Michigan - a relationship as inseparable as an eager researcher and their trusty calculator.

Building upon prior research by Smith et al., our results reinforce the notion of a positive association between these variables, affirming the enduring connection between educational pursuits in Physical sciences and the burgeoning population of statisticians. It appears that as the Physical sciences embrace the intricacies of the universe, statisticians are there to craft the numerical narratives that bring these phenomena to life. It's a partnership as harmonious as a data symphony, where each variable plays a distinct but complementary tune.

But let's not jump to conclusions quicker than a speeding t-test. As the statistical wiseacre might say, "just because these variables move together doesn't mean one can predict the other's moves in a square dance!" It's crucial to exercise caution in inferring causality based solely on correlation. After all, we wouldn't want to erroneously intimate that an uptick in Physical sciences degrees directly leads to a surge in statisticians. That would be as illogical as a one-tailed hypothesis test at a two-tailed party!

Our results not only corroborate the previous literature but also underscore the complex interplay between educational pursuits and occupational trends. The vibrant correlation we have unraveled opens the door to a myriad of intriguing questions: Are aspiring statisticians drawn to the allure of the physical sciences? Or does the rising popularity of Physical sciences degrees precipitate an increased demand for statisticians? It's a statistical mystery that warrants further inquiry, akin to a compelling plot twist in a science-themed whodunit.

As with any statistical investigation, our study is not without its limitations. The data offer a snapshot of a specific timeframe and geographical location, leaving room for broader exploration across different regions and temporal periods. Moreover, while our analysis illuminates a captivating correlation, untangling the nuanced mechanisms underlying this connection warrants a more nuanced and probing approach - one that transcends mere numbers and delves into the qualitative dimensions of educational and occupational choices.

In light of our tantalizing findings, it's evident that the relationship between Physical sciences degrees and the population of statisticians is more than just a statistical fling – it's a captivating narrative of numerical intertwining that begs for further elucidation. So, whether you're pondering the statistical significance of Physical sciences degrees or decoding the whimsical dance of data, remember to keep your analysis rigorous and your jokes statistically significant!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Associates degrees awarded in Physical sciences and The number of statisticians in Michigan. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Degrees of Data: Exploring the Statistical Relationship Between Physical Sciences Associates Degrees and Statisticians in Michigan"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delved into the fascinating connection between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Physical sciences and the abundance of statisticians in the great state of Michigan. With a keen eye for numerical analysis and a dash of statistical humor, we sought to unveil the nuanced interplay between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. After meticulously combing through data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8576431 and a significant p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021. It seems that as the number of Physical sciences degrees awarded rose, so did the population of statisticians in Michigan - a correlation that's as clear as 20/20 vision.

But before you start picturing a sunny statistical utopia, it's important to note that correlation does not imply causation - or, as we like to say in the stats world, "just because two variables move together, doesn't mean one causes the other... unless they're conjoined twins!" Our findings not only shed light on this quirky relationship, but also invite further exploration into the underlying factors driving this statistical camaraderie. So, whether you're pondering the statistical significance of Physical sciences degrees or musing about Michigan's mathematicians, remember: keep your data correlated and your jokes perfectly linear!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of statistics is no stranger to uncovering hidden connections, but the link between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Physical sciences and the abundance of statisticians in Michigan may seem like an unlikely match made in numerical heaven. As we embark on this statistical adventure, we are reminded of the wise words of Sir Arthur Eddington: "Not only is the universe stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine." And indeed, the statistical landscape we are about to explore may just prove to be as unexpected as a black hole in a data set. But fear not, fellow researchers and statistical enthusiasts, for in the midst of numbers and equations, we shall not lose sight of the humor and wit that make our journey all the more enjoyable.
First, let us pause for a moment to appreciate the beauty of statistics - a field where "mean" is not just a mathematical concept, but also a reminder to be kind, and where "outliers" are not just data points, but individuals who dare to defy the norm. Embracing the spirit of levity that characterizes our statistical inquiry, we will undoubtedly encounter some unexpected findings along the way. After all, as esteemed statistician Ronald Fisher once quipped, "To call in the statistician after the experiment is done may be no more than asking him to perform a post-mortem examination: he may be able to say what the experiment died of."
Now, returning to the matter at hand, the relationship between the number of Physical sciences degrees awarded and the population of statisticians in Michigan presents an intriguing puzzle, one that may hold the key to understanding the dynamics of educational and occupational trends. Before we dive headfirst into the sea of data, let us take a moment to appreciate the subtle irony that lies in our investigation – the quest to make sense of complexity through the elegant simplicity of numbers. As we embark on this statistical escapade, let us heed the words of the great Robert Heinlein: "It's a scientific fact that your body will not absorb cholesterol if you take it from another person's plate. Discovering this, we also found out that statistics are as easy to fudge as any other."
Armed with mathematical rigor and a healthy dose of humor, we are poised to unravel the mysteries that await us in the correlation between Physical sciences degrees and the community of statisticians in Michigan. So, as we set sail on this statistical odyssey, remember to always keep a keen eye on the data - and perhaps a dad joke or two close at hand!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of Physical sciences Associate degrees awarded and the population of statisticians in Michigan revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8576431. This strong positive correlation defies the stereotypical perception of statisticians as dispassionate number crunchers, as it seems they have quite an affinity for the physical sciences. Perhaps they are just trying to add some "dimension" to their field!
The r-squared value of 0.7355518 indicates that a substantial portion of the variability in the number of statisticians in Michigan can be explained by the number of Physical sciences Associate degrees awarded. It's almost as if statisticians in Michigan are saying, "Hey, we can't resist the allure of physical sciences - we're drawn to those significant digits!"
The p-value of less than 0.01 further solidifies the statistical significance of this relationship. The evidence is as clear as a perfectly normal distribution - there is indeed a compelling association between the two variables.
Upon visual inspection, the scatterplot (see Fig. 1) illustrates the compelling linear relationship between Physical sciences Associate degrees awarded and the number of statisticians in Michigan. It's as if the data points are charting a course for a statistically significant journey, navigating the seas of science and statistics together.
Our findings provide valuable insight into the coalescence of educational and occupational trends. The statistics seem to suggest that as the number of Physical sciences degrees awarded rose, so did the population of statisticians in Michigan. It's as if a statistical symbiosis is at play, with each variable influencing the other in a harmonious numerical dance.
However, as with any statistical analysis, it's crucial to remember that correlation does not imply causation. The association we uncovered should not lead us to jump to conclusions about causality. As the wise statisticians say, "Correlation is not causation - unless you're determining the impact of caffeine on statistical productivity. Then we're brewing up some strong causation!"
In conclusion, our study has elucidated a compelling statistical relationship between the number of Physical sciences Associate degrees awarded and the population of statisticians in Michigan. These findings not only highlight the interconnectedness of educational and occupational domains but also showcase the quirky, yet captivating, side of statistical analysis. So, whether you're crunching numbers or decoding data, remember to keep a keen eye on those correlations and... maybe throw in a dad joke or two for good measure!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the connection between the number of Physical sciences Associate degrees awarded and the population of statisticians in Michigan has certainly brought some statistical surprises to light. The striking correlation coefficient of 0.8576431 has painted a clear picture of the bond between these variables. It seems these statisticians are just "adding up" to the love for physical sciences - who knew they had such an "integral" role in the field?

The substantial r-squared value of 0.7355518 indicates that a significant portion of statisticians in Michigan can be explained by the number of Physical sciences Associate degrees awarded. It's almost as if these variables are saying, "We're statistically significant in each other's lives!" And with a p-value of less than 0.01, the evidence is as convincing as a well-constructed statistical argument - there is indeed a compelling association between the two.

However, we must tread carefully in interpreting these findings. As valuable as this statistical relationship may be, the age-old adage stands true - correlation does not imply causation. We must resist the temptation to assume that Physical sciences degrees are directly responsible for the burgeoning population of statisticians in Michigan. As we statisticians like to say, "Just because we're calculating probabilities doesn't mean we can predict the future - unless we're talking about the likelihood of a good lunch break!"

In light of these findings, it is evident that no further research in this area is needed. Our analysis has shed light on the statistical kinship between Physical sciences Associate degrees and the community of statisticians in Michigan. It's as if these variables were destined to be statistically linked, akin to a perfectly matched pair of data points. So, as we close this chapter on this statistical saga, let's remember to keep our data correlated and our jokes statistically significant!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Degrees of Data: Exploring the Statistical Relationship Between Physical Sciences Associates Degrees and Statisticians in Michigan. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Statistical Connections


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Degrees of Data: Exploring the Statistical Relationship Between Physical Sciences Associates Degrees and Statisticians in Michigan. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Interdisciplinary Data Analysis and Education


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Degrees of Data: Exploring the Statistical Relationship Between Physical Sciences Associates Degrees and Statisticians in Michigan with an abstract of In this study, we delved into the fascinating connection between the number of Associate degrees awarded in Physical sciences and the abundance of statisticians in the great state of Michigan. With a keen eye for numerical analysis and a dash of statistical humor, we sought to unveil the nuanced interplay between these seemingly unrelated phenomena. After meticulously combing through data from the National Center for Education Statistics and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we unearthed a correlation coefficient of 0.8576431 and a significant p-value less than 0.01 for the period from 2011 to 2021. It seems that as the number of Physical sciences degrees awarded rose, so did the population of statisticians in Michigan - a correlation that's as clear as 20/20 vision.
But before you start picturing a sunny statistical utopia, it's important to note that correlation does not imply causation - or, as we like to say in the stats world, "just because two variables move together, doesn't mean one causes the other... unless they're conjoined twins!" Our findings not only shed light on this quirky relationship, but also invite further exploration into the underlying factors driving this statistical camaraderie. So, whether you're pondering the statistical significance of Physical sciences degrees or musing about Michigan's mathematicians, remember: keep your data correlated and your jokes perfectly linear!

ChatGPT:

Physical sciences degrees, statisticians in Michigan, correlation between degrees and statisticians, National Center for Education Statistics, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation coefficient, p-value, causation vs correlation, statistical significance, Michigan mathematicians

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Associates degrees awarded in Physical sciences
Detailed data title: Associate's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions with a field of study of Physical sciences
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Associates degrees awarded in Physical sciences

The number of statisticians in Michigan
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of statisticians in Michigan
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of statisticians in Michigan

Correlation r = 0.8576431 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7355518 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 73.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of statisticians in Michigan) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Associates degrees awarded in Physical sciences) over the 11 years from 2011 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00074. 0.0007356359925267876000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.86 in 0.074% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,359 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.53, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Associates degrees awarded in Physical sciences (Degrees awarded)31483652408345185040552858386692706667626424
The number of statisticians in Michigan (Statisticians)470440410490500660580780670790580




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3148,3652,4083,4518,5040,5528,5838,6692,7066,6762,6424,])
array_2 = np.array([470,440,410,490,500,660,580,780,670,790,580,])
array_1_name = "Associates degrees awarded in Physical sciences"
array_2_name = "The number of statisticians in Michigan"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 3222 · Black Variable ID: 1250 · Red Variable ID: 9600
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0