about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,186 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in New Hampshire and the second variable is Biomass power generated in Chad.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2019, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The increased hand dexterity from all the cutting and trimming in New Hampshire led to more efficient wood processing, somehow creating a ripple effect that boosted the biomass power generation in Chad. It's like New Hampshire became the unexpected hand model for a sustainable energy ad campaign in Chad.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image depicting a group of cutters and trimmers in New Hampshire, surrounded by a mountain of wood shavings while magical flying carpets swoop in to carry the shavings across the ocean to Chad. In Chad, the shavings are deposited into a large biomass power plant, fueling the generation of energy. The image should be styled like a cover of a Discovery magazine, focusing on the fantastical nature of the scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in New Hampshire and Biomass power generated in Chad. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Woodblock painting A Discovery magazine cover image Cyberpunk Low poly a Polaroid photo
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in New Hampshire and Biomass power generated in Chad, in the following situation: As the number of cutters and trimmers in New Hampshire increases, it leads to a rise in the amount of wood being trimmed, which in turn causes an influx of excess wood shavings. These shavings are then sent off on magical flying carpets to Chad where they are used as fuel for biomass power generation.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In New Hampshire, the number of cutters and trimmers is growing, filling the air with the sound of buzzing saws. As more wood is trimmed, the excess shavings create an impressive mountain of wood shavings. Suddenly, magical flying carpets swoop in, carrying the shavings away across the ocean to Chad. There, the shavings are carefully deposited into a large biomass power plant, where they fuel the generation of energy.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In New Hampshire, the number of cutters and trimmers is growing, filling the air with the sound of buzzing saws. As more wood is trimmed, the excess shavings create an impressive mountain of wood shavings. Suddenly, magical flying carpets swoop in, carrying the shavings away across the ocean to Chad. There, the shavings are carefully deposited into a large biomass power plant, where they fuel the generation of energy. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image depicting a group of cutters and trimmers in New Hampshire, surrounded by a mountain of wood shavings while magical flying carpets swoop in to carry the shavings across the ocean to Chad. In Chad, the shavings are deposited into a large biomass power plant, fueling the generation of energy. The image should be styled like a cover of a Discovery magazine, focusing on the fantastical nature of the scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in New Hampshire caused Biomass power generated in Chad to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Trimming the Fat: The Cutting Edge Connection Between Hand Tools in New Hampshire and Biomass Power Generation in Chad

Journal of Transcontinental Tool Technology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in New Hampshire and Biomass power generated in Chad. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9045340 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2019.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Trimming the Fat: The Cutting Edge Connection Between Hand Tools in New Hampshire and Biomass Power Generation in Chad

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the intriguing link between the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in New Hampshire, and biomass power generated in Chad. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this unexpected connection to uncover some surprising results. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9045340, with p < 0.01, for the years 2012 to 2019.

The results of our analysis not only shed light on the interplay between seemingly disparate variables, but also provide fodder for some light-hearted banter. After all, who would have thought that the humble hand tool could hold sway over power generation in a distant land? It seems that the saying "cutting through red tape" has taken on a whole new, global significance!

Our research not only offers valuable insights into this unconventional relationship, but also emphasizes the importance of considering unexpected factors in statistical analyses. The findings presented herein lay the groundwork for further exploration into the intertwined nature of seemingly unrelated phenomena. And remember, when it comes to statistical correlations, one should always tread carefully - after all, the devil is in the data!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in New Hampshire and Biomass power generated in Chad. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Trimming the Fat: The Cutting Edge Connection Between Hand Tools in New Hampshire and Biomass Power Generation in Chad

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the intriguing link between the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in New Hampshire, and biomass power generated in Chad. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this unexpected connection to uncover some surprising results. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9045340, with p < 0.01, for the years 2012 to 2019.

The results of our analysis not only shed light on the interplay between seemingly disparate variables, but also provide fodder for some light-hearted banter. After all, who would have thought that the humble hand tool could hold sway over power generation in a distant land? It seems that the saying "cutting through red tape" has taken on a whole new, global significance!

Our research not only offers valuable insights into this unconventional relationship, but also emphasizes the importance of considering unexpected factors in statistical analyses. The findings presented herein lay the groundwork for further exploration into the intertwined nature of seemingly unrelated phenomena. And remember, when it comes to statistical correlations, one should always tread carefully - after all, the devil is in the data!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

As human beings, we are always seeking connections and patterns, whether it be in the complex web of human interactions, the mysteries of the cosmos, or even the linkage between seemingly unrelated variables. Our study delves into one such unexpected correlation between the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in the quaint state of New Hampshire, and the generation of biomass power in the picturesque landscapes of Chad. It may seem like a stretch, but as researchers, it's our job to trim the excess and uncover the underlying patterns, much like a conscientious gardener pruning a wayward hedge.

The statistical relationship between these two variables has long eluded conventional wisdom, and our investigation aims to shed light on this curious link, or as we like to call it, the "cutting edge connection" (pun fully intended). As we embarked on this research journey, we couldn't help but ponder: "What do hand tools in the Granite State have to do with biomass power in the African savanna? Perhaps it's a case of 'trimming the fat' from our assumptions about correlated phenomena!"

Our endeavor into this unexpected association, much like a wilderness explorer with a trusty machete, aims to carve through the underbrush of uncertainty and uncover the hidden path of statistical significance. After all, in the world of statistics, it's not just about crunching numbers; it's also about cutting through the noise to reveal the signal.

So, join us in this adventure as we explore the uncharted territory of unlikely statistical relationships and indulge in a few puns along the way. After all, when it comes to statistical correlations, we firmly believe it's important to maintain a sharp wit - much like a well-honed blade in the hands of a skilled craftsman.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in New Hampshire and Biomass power generated in Chad. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Trimming the Fat: The Cutting Edge Connection Between Hand Tools in New Hampshire and Biomass Power Generation in Chad

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the intriguing link between the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in New Hampshire, and biomass power generated in Chad. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this unexpected connection to uncover some surprising results. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9045340, with p < 0.01, for the years 2012 to 2019.

The results of our analysis not only shed light on the interplay between seemingly disparate variables, but also provide fodder for some light-hearted banter. After all, who would have thought that the humble hand tool could hold sway over power generation in a distant land? It seems that the saying "cutting through red tape" has taken on a whole new, global significance!

Our research not only offers valuable insights into this unconventional relationship, but also emphasizes the importance of considering unexpected factors in statistical analyses. The findings presented herein lay the groundwork for further exploration into the intertwined nature of seemingly unrelated phenomena. And remember, when it comes to statistical correlations, one should always tread carefully - after all, the devil is in the data!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As human beings, we are always seeking connections and patterns, whether it be in the complex web of human interactions, the mysteries of the cosmos, or even the linkage between seemingly unrelated variables. Our study delves into one such unexpected correlation between the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in the quaint state of New Hampshire, and the generation of biomass power in the picturesque landscapes of Chad. It may seem like a stretch, but as researchers, it's our job to trim the excess and uncover the underlying patterns, much like a conscientious gardener pruning a wayward hedge.
The statistical relationship between these two variables has long eluded conventional wisdom, and our investigation aims to shed light on this curious link, or as we like to call it, the "cutting edge connection" (pun fully intended). As we embarked on this research journey, we couldn't help but ponder: "What do hand tools in the Granite State have to do with biomass power in the African savanna? Perhaps it's a case of 'trimming the fat' from our assumptions about correlated phenomena!"
Our endeavor into this unexpected association, much like a wilderness explorer with a trusty machete, aims to carve through the underbrush of uncertainty and uncover the hidden path of statistical significance. After all, in the world of statistics, it's not just about crunching numbers; it's also about cutting through the noise to reveal the signal.
So, join us in this adventure as we explore the uncharted territory of unlikely statistical relationships and indulge in a few puns along the way. After all, when it comes to statistical correlations, we firmly believe it's important to maintain a sharp wit - much like a well-honed blade in the hands of a skilled craftsman.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previous studies have provided valuable insights into the utilization of hand tools in various contexts and the generation of biomass power. In "The Art of Pruning," the authors find that the efficiency of hand trimmers directly impacts the health and maintenance of garden flora. Similarly, in "Chainsaws: A History," Doe explores the evolution of cutting tools and their impact on forestry practices, shedding light on the role of manual and mechanical cutting methods in biomass production. These serious works set the stage for our investigation into the unexpected link between the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in New Hampshire, and biomass power generation in Chad.

However, as our research delved deeper into this unanticipated correlation, we couldn't help but notice the overlap with fiction literature – specifically, in "The Lawnmower Man" by Stephen King, where a man's affinity for cutting grass takes a supernatural turn. While our findings may not involve the supernatural, the idea of unexpected consequences stemming from seemingly mundane activities certainly rings true. We can't help but wonder if there's a "cutting edge" parallel between the protagonist's passion for landscape maintenance and the intricate web of biomass power generation in Chad.

Moving beyond literature, even board games enter the fray when we consider popular titles such as "Carcassonne," which involves strategically placing tiles to construct cities and roads. This game, albeit indirectly, touches upon the notion of constructing and shaping landscapes, much like the interconnected nature of biomass power generation and the use of hand tools. Our correlation coefficient may not seem as straightforward as winning points in a game, but the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables certainly adds a playful twist to our research.

In "The Silence of the Lambs" by Thomas Harris, the protagonist, Clarice Starling, seeks to understand her nemesis by examining his behavioral patterns and connections. Similarly, we aim to decipher the underlying patterns between hand tools in New Hampshire and biomass power generation in Chad. And just as Clarice relied on astute observation and analysis, our statistical investigation demands keen insight and an eye for unexpected correlations.

As we traverse the landscape of statistical analyses, it's essential to maintain a sharp wit – much like a well-honed blade in the hands of a skilled craftsman. After all, who knew that studying hand tools and power generation could be such a cutting-edge adventure?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in New Hampshire and Biomass power generated in Chad. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2012 to 2019

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Trimming the Fat: The Cutting Edge Connection Between Hand Tools in New Hampshire and Biomass Power Generation in Chad

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the intriguing link between the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in New Hampshire, and biomass power generated in Chad. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this unexpected connection to uncover some surprising results. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9045340, with p < 0.01, for the years 2012 to 2019.

The results of our analysis not only shed light on the interplay between seemingly disparate variables, but also provide fodder for some light-hearted banter. After all, who would have thought that the humble hand tool could hold sway over power generation in a distant land? It seems that the saying "cutting through red tape" has taken on a whole new, global significance!

Our research not only offers valuable insights into this unconventional relationship, but also emphasizes the importance of considering unexpected factors in statistical analyses. The findings presented herein lay the groundwork for further exploration into the intertwined nature of seemingly unrelated phenomena. And remember, when it comes to statistical correlations, one should always tread carefully - after all, the devil is in the data!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As human beings, we are always seeking connections and patterns, whether it be in the complex web of human interactions, the mysteries of the cosmos, or even the linkage between seemingly unrelated variables. Our study delves into one such unexpected correlation between the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in the quaint state of New Hampshire, and the generation of biomass power in the picturesque landscapes of Chad. It may seem like a stretch, but as researchers, it's our job to trim the excess and uncover the underlying patterns, much like a conscientious gardener pruning a wayward hedge.
The statistical relationship between these two variables has long eluded conventional wisdom, and our investigation aims to shed light on this curious link, or as we like to call it, the "cutting edge connection" (pun fully intended). As we embarked on this research journey, we couldn't help but ponder: "What do hand tools in the Granite State have to do with biomass power in the African savanna? Perhaps it's a case of 'trimming the fat' from our assumptions about correlated phenomena!"
Our endeavor into this unexpected association, much like a wilderness explorer with a trusty machete, aims to carve through the underbrush of uncertainty and uncover the hidden path of statistical significance. After all, in the world of statistics, it's not just about crunching numbers; it's also about cutting through the noise to reveal the signal.
So, join us in this adventure as we explore the uncharted territory of unlikely statistical relationships and indulge in a few puns along the way. After all, when it comes to statistical correlations, we firmly believe it's important to maintain a sharp wit - much like a well-honed blade in the hands of a skilled craftsman.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unearth the tantalizing connection between the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in New Hampshire, and the biomass power generated in Chad, our research team employed a multifaceted approach that was as meticulous as the finest woodworking and as nimble as a well-manicured hedge trimmer. We meticulously gathered data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, examining records spanning from 2012 to 2019. The data was then carefully scrutinized, much like the precision required to craft the ideal statistical model.

We began by quantifying the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in New Hampshire, utilizing data points from each year within our specified timeframe. Our team ensured that the data was as sharp as a newly honed blade, precluding any blunt instruments from creeping into our analysis. As the saying goes, "the sharpest tool in the shed is the one that's been properly calibrated!"

Likewise, in assessing the biomass power generation in Chad, we meticulously combed through the figures provided by the Energy Information Administration. Our method aimed to ensure that the data was not only reliable but also seamlessly integrated into our statistical framework, much like the gears of a finely tuned machine.

One of the challenges our team encountered was the "cutting" of extraneous data points and outliers, which had the potential to skew our results like a blunt blade veering off course. We employed a rigorous process to identify and discard such anomalies, ensuring that our subsequent analysis was as precise as a skilled carpenter measuring twice and cutting once.

Having meticulously curated our datasets, we turned our attention to the statistical analysis, opting for a comprehensive approach that would lay bare the intricate relationship between the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in New Hampshire, and the biomass power generated in Chad. Our team employed both correlation analysis and regression modeling, seeking to slice through the layers of complexity and reveal the underlying patterns with the finesse of a master chef effortlessly filleting a fish.

We calculated the correlation coefficient and performed hypothesis testing to ascertain the strength and significance of the relationship between the two variables. Our approach was driven by the firm belief that statistical analysis should be as sharp as a well-honed chisel, chipping away at uncertainty with precision and rigor.

In addition to the traditional statistical techniques, we also explored alternative models and sensitivity analyses to ensure the robustness of our findings, much like a craftsman testing different blades to find the perfect fit for a particular task. Our methodological approach aimed to cut through the noise, leaving us with a clear understanding of the nuanced interplay between hand tools in New Hampshire and biomass power generation in Chad.

Ultimately, our methodology was crafted with a keen eye for detail and a penchant for precision, endeavoring to carve out a deeper understanding of this unexpected and captivating statistical relationship. As the old adage goes, "When it comes to statistical analysis, it's important to have the right tools for the job, and perhaps a few sharp puns too!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in New Hampshire and Biomass power generated in Chad. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2012 to 2019, you found a correlation 0.9045340, r-squared of 0.8181818, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Trimming the Fat: The Cutting Edge Connection Between Hand Tools in New Hampshire and Biomass Power Generation in Chad

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the intriguing link between the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in New Hampshire, and biomass power generated in Chad. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this unexpected connection to uncover some surprising results. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9045340, with p < 0.01, for the years 2012 to 2019.

The results of our analysis not only shed light on the interplay between seemingly disparate variables, but also provide fodder for some light-hearted banter. After all, who would have thought that the humble hand tool could hold sway over power generation in a distant land? It seems that the saying "cutting through red tape" has taken on a whole new, global significance!

Our research not only offers valuable insights into this unconventional relationship, but also emphasizes the importance of considering unexpected factors in statistical analyses. The findings presented herein lay the groundwork for further exploration into the intertwined nature of seemingly unrelated phenomena. And remember, when it comes to statistical correlations, one should always tread carefully - after all, the devil is in the data!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As human beings, we are always seeking connections and patterns, whether it be in the complex web of human interactions, the mysteries of the cosmos, or even the linkage between seemingly unrelated variables. Our study delves into one such unexpected correlation between the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in the quaint state of New Hampshire, and the generation of biomass power in the picturesque landscapes of Chad. It may seem like a stretch, but as researchers, it's our job to trim the excess and uncover the underlying patterns, much like a conscientious gardener pruning a wayward hedge.
The statistical relationship between these two variables has long eluded conventional wisdom, and our investigation aims to shed light on this curious link, or as we like to call it, the "cutting edge connection" (pun fully intended). As we embarked on this research journey, we couldn't help but ponder: "What do hand tools in the Granite State have to do with biomass power in the African savanna? Perhaps it's a case of 'trimming the fat' from our assumptions about correlated phenomena!"
Our endeavor into this unexpected association, much like a wilderness explorer with a trusty machete, aims to carve through the underbrush of uncertainty and uncover the hidden path of statistical significance. After all, in the world of statistics, it's not just about crunching numbers; it's also about cutting through the noise to reveal the signal.
So, join us in this adventure as we explore the uncharted territory of unlikely statistical relationships and indulge in a few puns along the way. After all, when it comes to statistical correlations, we firmly believe it's important to maintain a sharp wit - much like a well-honed blade in the hands of a skilled craftsman.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the relationship between the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in New Hampshire and biomass power generated in Chad yielded a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9045340, with an r-squared of 0.8181818, and a p-value less than 0.01. This indicates a strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that the humble hand tool holds more power than we ever imagined - quite literally!

Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot visualizing this unexpected connection, illustrating the remarkable coherence between the two variables. It seems that the phrase "cutting-edge technology" has taken on a whole new meaning – who would have thought that a simple hand tool could have such a far-reaching impact on power generation?

Our findings highlight the importance of considering unconventional factors in statistical analyses. It appears that in the realm of statistical relationships, one should always keep an open mind and be prepared for some surprising twists and turns – just like navigating a labyrinth with a pair of hedge trimmers!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in New Hampshire and Biomass power generated in Chad. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Trimming the Fat: The Cutting Edge Connection Between Hand Tools in New Hampshire and Biomass Power Generation in Chad

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the intriguing link between the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in New Hampshire, and biomass power generated in Chad. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this unexpected connection to uncover some surprising results. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9045340, with p < 0.01, for the years 2012 to 2019.

The results of our analysis not only shed light on the interplay between seemingly disparate variables, but also provide fodder for some light-hearted banter. After all, who would have thought that the humble hand tool could hold sway over power generation in a distant land? It seems that the saying "cutting through red tape" has taken on a whole new, global significance!

Our research not only offers valuable insights into this unconventional relationship, but also emphasizes the importance of considering unexpected factors in statistical analyses. The findings presented herein lay the groundwork for further exploration into the intertwined nature of seemingly unrelated phenomena. And remember, when it comes to statistical correlations, one should always tread carefully - after all, the devil is in the data!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous studies have provided valuable insights into the utilization of hand tools in various contexts and the generation of biomass power. In "The Art of Pruning," the authors find that the efficiency of hand trimmers directly impacts the health and maintenance of garden flora. Similarly, in "Chainsaws: A History," Doe explores the evolution of cutting tools and their impact on forestry practices, shedding light on the role of manual and mechanical cutting methods in biomass production. These serious works set the stage for our investigation into the unexpected link between the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in New Hampshire, and biomass power generation in Chad.
However, as our research delved deeper into this unanticipated correlation, we couldn't help but notice the overlap with fiction literature – specifically, in "The Lawnmower Man" by Stephen King, where a man's affinity for cutting grass takes a supernatural turn. While our findings may not involve the supernatural, the idea of unexpected consequences stemming from seemingly mundane activities certainly rings true. We can't help but wonder if there's a "cutting edge" parallel between the protagonist's passion for landscape maintenance and the intricate web of biomass power generation in Chad.
Moving beyond literature, even board games enter the fray when we consider popular titles such as "Carcassonne," which involves strategically placing tiles to construct cities and roads. This game, albeit indirectly, touches upon the notion of constructing and shaping landscapes, much like the interconnected nature of biomass power generation and the use of hand tools. Our correlation coefficient may not seem as straightforward as winning points in a game, but the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated variables certainly adds a playful twist to our research.
In "The Silence of the Lambs" by Thomas Harris, the protagonist, Clarice Starling, seeks to understand her nemesis by examining his behavioral patterns and connections. Similarly, we aim to decipher the underlying patterns between hand tools in New Hampshire and biomass power generation in Chad. And just as Clarice relied on astute observation and analysis, our statistical investigation demands keen insight and an eye for unexpected correlations.
As we traverse the landscape of statistical analyses, it's essential to maintain a sharp wit – much like a well-honed blade in the hands of a skilled craftsman. After all, who knew that studying hand tools and power generation could be such a cutting-edge adventure?

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in New Hampshire and biomass power generated in Chad yielded a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9045340, with an r-squared of 0.8181818, and a p-value less than 0.01. This indicates a strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that the humble hand tool holds more power than we ever imagined - quite literally!
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot visualizing this unexpected connection, illustrating the remarkable coherence between the two variables. It seems that the phrase "cutting-edge technology" has taken on a whole new meaning – who would have thought that a simple hand tool could have such a far-reaching impact on power generation?
Our findings highlight the importance of considering unconventional factors in statistical analyses. It appears that in the realm of statistical relationships, one should always keep an open mind and be prepared for some surprising twists and turns – just like navigating a labyrinth with a pair of hedge trimmers!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation into the connection between the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in New Hampshire, and biomass power generated in Chad, has yielded some intriguing results. The strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9045340, with a p-value of less than 0.01, underscores the robustness of the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that the grip of hand tools extends far beyond the physical and into the realm of global power dynamics – quite a sharp turn of events, wouldn't you say?

Our findings are consistent with prior literature that has emphasized the impact of hand tools on various domains. Much like the meticulous pruning of garden flora in "The Art of Pruning," our results suggest that the use of hand tools does indeed have a ripple effect across geographical and industrial boundaries. As Doe's exploration of cutting tools in "Chainsaws: A History" illuminated their role in biomass production, we have now uncovered a tangible connection between the prevalence of hand tools in New Hampshire and the generation of biomass power in Chad.

The unexpected overlap with fictional literature, such as Stephen King's "The Lawnmower Man," where the protagonist's affinity for cutting grass takes an otherworldly turn, resonates with our findings. While we did not encounter supernatural elements in our statistical analysis, the revelation of this unanticipated correlation certainly adds a whimsical twist to our research. It seems that the power of statistical relationships can be as surprising as a plot twist in a novel – who knew that a seemingly mundane hand tool could hold such captivating sway over global energy dynamics?

As we navigate the landscape of statistical analyses, it is essential to approach our findings with a well-honed sense of humor – after all, the significance of statistical relationships often lies in the unexpected. Our correlation coefficient may not be as direct as a strategic move in "Carcassonne," but it certainly underscores the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. In the spirit of "The Silence of the Lambs," our endeavor to decipher the patterns between hand tools and power generation in Chad has been akin to astute observation and analysis, albeit with a lighthearted twist.

Overall, our research not only amplifies the importance of considering unconventional factors in statistical analyses but also underscores the global reach of seemingly mundane tools. It seems that the old adage "having the right tools for the job" extends far beyond the immediate task at hand and into the intricate web of global energy dynamics. The humble hand tool, it appears, wields a power that cuts through geographical and industrial contexts like a well-sharpened blade - truly a cutting-edge revelation in the world of statistical relationships!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in New Hampshire and Biomass power generated in Chad. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Trimming the Fat: The Cutting Edge Connection Between Hand Tools in New Hampshire and Biomass Power Generation in Chad

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the intriguing link between the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in New Hampshire, and biomass power generated in Chad. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this unexpected connection to uncover some surprising results. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9045340, with p < 0.01, for the years 2012 to 2019.

The results of our analysis not only shed light on the interplay between seemingly disparate variables, but also provide fodder for some light-hearted banter. After all, who would have thought that the humble hand tool could hold sway over power generation in a distant land? It seems that the saying "cutting through red tape" has taken on a whole new, global significance!

Our research not only offers valuable insights into this unconventional relationship, but also emphasizes the importance of considering unexpected factors in statistical analyses. The findings presented herein lay the groundwork for further exploration into the intertwined nature of seemingly unrelated phenomena. And remember, when it comes to statistical correlations, one should always tread carefully - after all, the devil is in the data!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As human beings, we are always seeking connections and patterns, whether it be in the complex web of human interactions, the mysteries of the cosmos, or even the linkage between seemingly unrelated variables. Our study delves into one such unexpected correlation between the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in the quaint state of New Hampshire, and the generation of biomass power in the picturesque landscapes of Chad. It may seem like a stretch, but as researchers, it's our job to trim the excess and uncover the underlying patterns, much like a conscientious gardener pruning a wayward hedge.
The statistical relationship between these two variables has long eluded conventional wisdom, and our investigation aims to shed light on this curious link, or as we like to call it, the "cutting edge connection" (pun fully intended). As we embarked on this research journey, we couldn't help but ponder: "What do hand tools in the Granite State have to do with biomass power in the African savanna? Perhaps it's a case of 'trimming the fat' from our assumptions about correlated phenomena!"
Our endeavor into this unexpected association, much like a wilderness explorer with a trusty machete, aims to carve through the underbrush of uncertainty and uncover the hidden path of statistical significance. After all, in the world of statistics, it's not just about crunching numbers; it's also about cutting through the noise to reveal the signal.
So, join us in this adventure as we explore the uncharted territory of unlikely statistical relationships and indulge in a few puns along the way. After all, when it comes to statistical correlations, we firmly believe it's important to maintain a sharp wit - much like a well-honed blade in the hands of a skilled craftsman.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the relationship between the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in New Hampshire and biomass power generated in Chad yielded a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9045340, with an r-squared of 0.8181818, and a p-value less than 0.01. This indicates a strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that the humble hand tool holds more power than we ever imagined - quite literally!
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot visualizing this unexpected connection, illustrating the remarkable coherence between the two variables. It seems that the phrase "cutting-edge technology" has taken on a whole new meaning – who would have thought that a simple hand tool could have such a far-reaching impact on power generation?
Our findings highlight the importance of considering unconventional factors in statistical analyses. It appears that in the realm of statistical relationships, one should always keep an open mind and be prepared for some surprising twists and turns – just like navigating a labyrinth with a pair of hedge trimmers!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has uncovered a robust correlation between the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in New Hampshire, and biomass power generated in Chad. The strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9045340, with a p-value less than 0.01, suggests a strong positive association between these seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that even in the world of statistics, the concept of "cutting corners" takes on a whole new meaning – who knew hand tools could shape statistical landscapes as well as hedges!

Our findings not only challenge conventional assumptions but also open the door to a myriad of pun-filled discussions. After all, when it comes to unexpected statistical relationships, one should always be armed with a sharp wit – much like a well-honed blade in the hands of a skilled craftsman.

So, what does a hand tool in New Hampshire have to do with biomass power in Chad? It seems that sometimes the data likes to "trim the fat" from our expectations and present us with unexpected insights, much like a diligent gardener sculpting a topiary. Our research emphasizes the importance of embracing unconventional factors in statistical analyses and always being ready for some curveballs – after all, in statistics, it's not just about crunching numbers; it's also about trimming through the noise to reveal the signal!

In light of these findings, we firmly believe that no more research is needed in this area. The statistical, and dare I say, "humerus" connection between hand tools and power generation has been aptly pruned and presented for all to see. It seems that the correlation between these variables is as clear as a well-manicured lawn – no more cutting, trimming, or pruning required here!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Trimming the Fat: The Cutting Edge Connection Between Hand Tools in New Hampshire and Biomass Power Generation in Chad. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Transcontinental Tool Technology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Trimming the Fat: The Cutting Edge Connection Between Hand Tools in New Hampshire and Biomass Power Generation in Chad. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The International Consortium for Sustainable Energy Solutions and Rural Development


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Trimming the Fat: The Cutting Edge Connection Between Hand Tools in New Hampshire and Biomass Power Generation in Chad with an abstract of In this paper, we investigate the intriguing link between the number of cutters and trimmers, hand, in New Hampshire, and biomass power generated in Chad. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we delved into this unexpected connection to uncover some surprising results. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9045340, with p < 0.01, for the years 2012 to 2019.
The results of our analysis not only shed light on the interplay between seemingly disparate variables, but also provide fodder for some light-hearted banter. After all, who would have thought that the humble hand tool could hold sway over power generation in a distant land? It seems that the saying "cutting through red tape" has taken on a whole new, global significance!
Our research not only offers valuable insights into this unconventional relationship, but also emphasizes the importance of considering unexpected factors in statistical analyses. The findings presented herein lay the groundwork for further exploration into the intertwined nature of seemingly unrelated phenomena. And remember, when it comes to statistical correlations, one should always tread carefully - after all, the devil is in the data!

ChatGPT:

"hand tools biomass power generation correlation," "New Hampshire biomass power connection," "Bureau of Labor Statistics hand tools," "Energy Information Administration biomass power," "unusual statistical correlations," "interconnected phenomena in statistics," "unconventional relationship in statistical analysis," "unexpected factors in statistical analyses," "correlation coefficient in statistical analysis"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in New Hampshire
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of cutters and trimmers, hand in New Hampshire
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in New Hampshire

Biomass power generated in Chad
Detailed data title: Total biomass power generated in Chad in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Biomass power generated in Chad

Correlation r = 0.9045340 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8181818 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Biomass power generated in Chad) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in New Hampshire) over the 8 years from 2012 through 2019.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00202. 0.0020223677405427254000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.202% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 494 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.55, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019
The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in New Hampshire (Laborers)50604040605013090
Biomass power generated in Chad (Billion kWh)0.0090.0090.0090.0090.0090.0090.010.01




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.
  5. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([50,60,40,40,60,50,130,90,])
array_2 = np.array([0.009,0.009,0.009,0.009,0.009,0.009,0.01,0.01,])
array_1_name = "The number of cutters and trimmers, hand in New Hampshire"
array_2_name = "Biomass power generated in Chad"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 3186 · Black Variable ID: 11484 · Red Variable ID: 23583
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0