about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,148 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and the second variable is Liquefied petroleum gas used in Belarus.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky dwindled, there was a noticeable dip in the demand for nail polish. This led to a surplus of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) in Belarus, as there were fewer colorful nails requiring drying. Turns out, it was a case of 'nail art' affecting global gas art!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] Generate an image of a bustling nail salon in Kentucky where manicurists and pedicurists are meticulously painting intricate nail designs for their clients. As they work, a comical scene unfolds where the demand for their services leads to an increase in the use of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG). The vibrant nail designs catch fire in a dazzling display, and it causes a ripple effect that creates a need for more LPG in far-off Belarus. The image should capture the chaos and humor of the situation, with a colorful and vibrant aesthetic that reflects the flamboyant nail designs and the unexpected turn of events with the LPG. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Belarus. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Low poly Steampunk a funny image you would see on reddit A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Voxel art
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Belarus, in the following situation: As the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky increases, so does the demand for Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Belarus. This is because the nail artists are creating such hot trends that they are literally setting the nail polish on fire, hence the need for more LPG in Belarus!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling salon in Kentucky, a group of manicurists and pedicurists work diligently, painting intricate nail designs for their clients. As they work, the demand for their services grows, leading to an increase in the use of Liquefied Petroleum Gas. The vibrant nail designs catch fire in a dazzling display, creating a need for more LPG in far-off Belarus.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling salon in Kentucky, a group of manicurists and pedicurists work diligently, painting intricate nail designs for their clients. As they work, the demand for their services grows, leading to an increase in the use of Liquefied Petroleum Gas. The vibrant nail designs catch fire in a dazzling display, creating a need for more LPG in far-off Belarus. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] Generate an image of a bustling nail salon in Kentucky where manicurists and pedicurists are meticulously painting intricate nail designs for their clients. As they work, a comical scene unfolds where the demand for their services leads to an increase in the use of Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG). The vibrant nail designs catch fire in a dazzling display, and it causes a ripple effect that creates a need for more LPG in far-off Belarus. The image should capture the chaos and humor of the situation, with a colorful and vibrant aesthetic that reflects the flamboyant nail designs and the unexpected turn of events with the LPG.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky caused Liquefied petroleum gas used in Belarus to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Polishing Connections: The Surprising Link Between Manicurists and Pedicurists in Kentucky and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Belarus

The Journal of Transcontinental Cosmetology and Green Energy Usage

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Belarus. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7854890 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Polishing Connections: The Surprising Link Between Manicurists and Pedicurists in Kentucky and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Belarus"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the perplexing relationship between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in the Bluegrass State of Kentucky and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in the distant land of Belarus. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.7854890 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were calculated for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2021. The findings of this research both tantalize and confound, raising questions about the potential unforeseen connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This unconventional correlation challenges conventional wisdom and beckons further investigation into the whimsical and whimsical world of unintended consequences.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Belarus. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Polishing Connections: The Surprising Link Between Manicurists and Pedicurists in Kentucky and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Belarus"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the perplexing relationship between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in the Bluegrass State of Kentucky and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in the distant land of Belarus. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.7854890 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were calculated for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2021. The findings of this research both tantalize and confound, raising questions about the potential unforeseen connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This unconventional correlation challenges conventional wisdom and beckons further investigation into the whimsical and whimsical world of unintended consequences.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the grand tapestry of the universe, where the threads of causality weave an intricate and often perplexing pattern, lie the enigmatic connections between disparate phenomena. Some connections are intuitive and easily explicable, like the correlation between ice cream sales and sunburns. But others, like the relationship between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Belarus, offer a more confounding puzzle.

As we embark on this scholarly journey, we find ourselves at the intersection of beauty services and energy consumption, a junction that might seem as incongruous as a rare isotope attending a ball at the molecular level. Yet, armed with the tools of statistical analysis and a healthy dose of curiosity, we delve into the realm of numerical data to illuminate this intriguing correlation.

The notion of analyzing the employment of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky, a state renowned for its horse racing and bourbon, alongside the consumption of LPG in Belarus, a land rich in history and potatoes, may seem like a departure from traditional research pursuits. However, as practitioners of empirical inquiry, we are duty-bound to explore the unexpected and the quirky, for it is often in these uncharted territories that the most captivating discoveries await.

With tongue firmly in cheek and minds brimming with statistical rigor, we embark upon an odyssey of correlation and causation, seeking to unveil the underlying dynamics of this whimsical connection. It is our fervent hope that this endeavor will not only yield insights into the peculiar interplay of seemingly unrelated variables but also inject a dash of levity and delight into the often sober realm of academic discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Belarus. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Polishing Connections: The Surprising Link Between Manicurists and Pedicurists in Kentucky and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Belarus"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the perplexing relationship between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in the Bluegrass State of Kentucky and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in the distant land of Belarus. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.7854890 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were calculated for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2021. The findings of this research both tantalize and confound, raising questions about the potential unforeseen connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This unconventional correlation challenges conventional wisdom and beckons further investigation into the whimsical and whimsical world of unintended consequences.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the grand tapestry of the universe, where the threads of causality weave an intricate and often perplexing pattern, lie the enigmatic connections between disparate phenomena. Some connections are intuitive and easily explicable, like the correlation between ice cream sales and sunburns. But others, like the relationship between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Belarus, offer a more confounding puzzle.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, we find ourselves at the intersection of beauty services and energy consumption, a junction that might seem as incongruous as a rare isotope attending a ball at the molecular level. Yet, armed with the tools of statistical analysis and a healthy dose of curiosity, we delve into the realm of numerical data to illuminate this intriguing correlation.
The notion of analyzing the employment of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky, a state renowned for its horse racing and bourbon, alongside the consumption of LPG in Belarus, a land rich in history and potatoes, may seem like a departure from traditional research pursuits. However, as practitioners of empirical inquiry, we are duty-bound to explore the unexpected and the quirky, for it is often in these uncharted territories that the most captivating discoveries await.
With tongue firmly in cheek and minds brimming with statistical rigor, we embark upon an odyssey of correlation and causation, seeking to unveil the underlying dynamics of this whimsical connection. It is our fervent hope that this endeavor will not only yield insights into the peculiar interplay of seemingly unrelated variables but also inject a dash of levity and delight into the often sober realm of academic discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The examination of the curious relationship between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Belarus has elicited a variety of responses from the academic community. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of beauty service employment trends in the United States, uncovering intriguing patterns in the spatial distribution of manicurists and pedicurists. Their work laid the groundwork for further investigations into the potential ramifications of such employment patterns on international energy consumption.

Doe and Jones (2018) expanded upon this foundation by delving into the historical background of LPG usage in Eastern European countries. Their meticulous examination of energy consumption dynamics shed light on the complexities of LPG demand in Belarus and its neighboring regions. This study provided valuable context for the unexpected correlation discovered in the present research, prompting contemplation of the broader societal implications of beauty services and energy usage.

Turning to non-fiction publications, "The Economics of Beauty: An Analysis of Market Forces in Cosmetology" by White (2019) offers a thought-provoking exploration of the economic forces at play within the beauty industry. While White's work primarily focuses on domestic market dynamics, its insights into the labor market and consumer behavior are relevant to the examination of manicurist and pedicurist employment in the unique context of Kentucky. Additionally, "Gasoline and Glamour: Unraveling the Conundrum of Unlikely Correlations" by Gray (2017) presents a compelling analysis of unexpected confluences in economic data, providing a theoretical framework for interpreting the surprising link between beauty services and energy consumption.

In the realm of fiction, the works of Gabriel García Márquez, particularly "One Hundred Years of Solitude" and "Love in the Time of Cholera," evoke a sense of interconnectedness and serendipitous occurrences that resonate with the inexplicable correlation under scrutiny. While obviously not directly related to the subject at hand, the themes of interwoven destinies and the whims of fate permeate these literary works, inviting contemplation of the enigmatic connections that permeate our world.

Furthermore, recent social media discourse has offered intriguing anecdotes that may shed light on the unconventional correlation being investigated. A user on a popular platform expressed astonishment at the simultaneous increase in nail salon openings in Kentucky and LPG shipments to Belarus, humorously musing about a potential "manicure-induced energy boom." While lighthearted in nature, such observations underscore the public's fascination with the unexpected intersections of seemingly unrelated phenomena, illustrating the broader cultural relevance of this research inquiry.

As the examination of this singular correlation unfolds, it becomes apparent that the intersections of beauty services and energy consumption yield a rich tapestry of comedic potential and intellectual stimulation. The obscure connections between manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and LPG usage in Belarus beckon the scholarly community to delve into the whimsical and oftentimes comical nuances of causality, reminding us that in the labyrinthine landscape of data analysis, surprises lurk around every statistical corner.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Belarus. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2003 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Polishing Connections: The Surprising Link Between Manicurists and Pedicurists in Kentucky and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Belarus"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the perplexing relationship between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in the Bluegrass State of Kentucky and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in the distant land of Belarus. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.7854890 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were calculated for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2021. The findings of this research both tantalize and confound, raising questions about the potential unforeseen connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This unconventional correlation challenges conventional wisdom and beckons further investigation into the whimsical and whimsical world of unintended consequences.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the grand tapestry of the universe, where the threads of causality weave an intricate and often perplexing pattern, lie the enigmatic connections between disparate phenomena. Some connections are intuitive and easily explicable, like the correlation between ice cream sales and sunburns. But others, like the relationship between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Belarus, offer a more confounding puzzle.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, we find ourselves at the intersection of beauty services and energy consumption, a junction that might seem as incongruous as a rare isotope attending a ball at the molecular level. Yet, armed with the tools of statistical analysis and a healthy dose of curiosity, we delve into the realm of numerical data to illuminate this intriguing correlation.
The notion of analyzing the employment of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky, a state renowned for its horse racing and bourbon, alongside the consumption of LPG in Belarus, a land rich in history and potatoes, may seem like a departure from traditional research pursuits. However, as practitioners of empirical inquiry, we are duty-bound to explore the unexpected and the quirky, for it is often in these uncharted territories that the most captivating discoveries await.
With tongue firmly in cheek and minds brimming with statistical rigor, we embark upon an odyssey of correlation and causation, seeking to unveil the underlying dynamics of this whimsical connection. It is our fervent hope that this endeavor will not only yield insights into the peculiar interplay of seemingly unrelated variables but also inject a dash of levity and delight into the often sober realm of academic discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this study harnessed the power of data collection and statistical analysis to unravel the mysterious relationship between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Belarus. The data utilized in this research endeavor were sourced primarily from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, spanning the period from 2003 to 2021.

To capture the essence of quirky correlations, a multi-faceted approach was adopted. Firstly, the employment statistics of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky were gathered to decode the fluctuations in the grooming industry, which often left one pondering whether these professionals were truly “nailing” their job. These data were then matched with the LPG consumption figures in Belarus, which revealed surprising parallels that made one contemplate if there was, indeed, a "polished" connection between the two.

The process of data collection was akin to picking the finest ingredients for an intriguing scientific recipe. To ensure a comprehensive dataset, information regarding the geographic distribution of manicure and pedicure services in Kentucky, as well as the volume of LPG consumption in different regions of Belarus, was meticulously compiled. This meticulous process of information gathering was analogized to the meticulous filing of nails, each data point representing a unique pointer in the grand tapestry of statistical analysis.

Upon assembling the requisite data, rigorous statistical techniques were employed to uncover any underlying relationships. Correlation analysis, with its propensity to reveal surprising connections, became the instrument of choice in this investigation. The correlation coefficient was calculated meticulously, akin to a meticulous manicure, to ascertain the strength and direction of the relationship between the variables under consideration. The p-value, that harbinger of statistical significance, was also calculated with exacting precision, akin to a skilled pedicurist expertly assessing the vitality of the skin.

Of course, no study is without its limitations, and this offbeat research adventure is no exception. The potential influence of unobserved variables, such as cultural factors and economic trends, could not be entirely mitigated. Nevertheless, the endeavor to unravel the delightful connection between the grooming industry in Kentucky and the consumption of LPG in Belarus holds promise not only for academic inquiry but also for injecting a quintessential sprinkle of merriment into the domain of research.

Thus, armed with data, statistical tools, and a zest for uncovering whimsical correlations, the research team set out on an exploratory journey into the realm of manicurists, pedicurists, and liquefied petroleum gas, poised to unveil the quirky ties that bind these seemingly unrelated variables.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Belarus. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2003 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.7854890, r-squared of 0.6169930, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Polishing Connections: The Surprising Link Between Manicurists and Pedicurists in Kentucky and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Belarus"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the perplexing relationship between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in the Bluegrass State of Kentucky and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in the distant land of Belarus. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.7854890 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were calculated for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2021. The findings of this research both tantalize and confound, raising questions about the potential unforeseen connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This unconventional correlation challenges conventional wisdom and beckons further investigation into the whimsical and whimsical world of unintended consequences.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the grand tapestry of the universe, where the threads of causality weave an intricate and often perplexing pattern, lie the enigmatic connections between disparate phenomena. Some connections are intuitive and easily explicable, like the correlation between ice cream sales and sunburns. But others, like the relationship between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Belarus, offer a more confounding puzzle.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, we find ourselves at the intersection of beauty services and energy consumption, a junction that might seem as incongruous as a rare isotope attending a ball at the molecular level. Yet, armed with the tools of statistical analysis and a healthy dose of curiosity, we delve into the realm of numerical data to illuminate this intriguing correlation.
The notion of analyzing the employment of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky, a state renowned for its horse racing and bourbon, alongside the consumption of LPG in Belarus, a land rich in history and potatoes, may seem like a departure from traditional research pursuits. However, as practitioners of empirical inquiry, we are duty-bound to explore the unexpected and the quirky, for it is often in these uncharted territories that the most captivating discoveries await.
With tongue firmly in cheek and minds brimming with statistical rigor, we embark upon an odyssey of correlation and causation, seeking to unveil the underlying dynamics of this whimsical connection. It is our fervent hope that this endeavor will not only yield insights into the peculiar interplay of seemingly unrelated variables but also inject a dash of levity and delight into the often sober realm of academic discourse.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis unveiled a surprising and robust correlation between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Belarus for the period from 2003 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.7854890 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation suggests that as the number of manicurists and pedicurists in the Bluegrass State increased, so did the consumption of LPG in the distant land of Belarus.

The observed relationship was further bolstered by an r-squared value of 0.6169930, demonstrating that approximately 61.7% of the variation in LPG consumption in Belarus can be explained by changes in the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky. It appears that the vibrant nail care industry in Kentucky may have unforeseen implications for energy consumption in a land known for its potatoes and rich history.

Furthermore, the statistical significance of the correlation was confirmed by a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the likelihood of this relationship occurring purely by chance is exceedingly low. It seems that the bond between manicurists, pedicurists, and LPG consumption is not a mere statistical fluke but a genuine phenomenon deserving of scholarly attention.

To visually capture the essence of this remarkable correlation, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) was constructed, depicting the striking positive relationship between the number of beauty professionals in Kentucky and LPG consumption in Belarus. The scatterplot unmistakably illustrates the strong association between these variables and serves as a visual testament to the unexpected interplay between beauty services and energy dynamics.

In conclusion, the astonishing correlation between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and LPG consumption in Belarus challenges conventional wisdom and beckons further exploration into the peculiar and capricious interconnections within the fabric of our world. This unlikely pairing of variables not only highlights the whimsicality of empirical inquiry but also underscores the endless potential for delightful discoveries in the unlikeliest of places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Belarus. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Polishing Connections: The Surprising Link Between Manicurists and Pedicurists in Kentucky and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Belarus"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the perplexing relationship between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in the Bluegrass State of Kentucky and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in the distant land of Belarus. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.7854890 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were calculated for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2021. The findings of this research both tantalize and confound, raising questions about the potential unforeseen connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This unconventional correlation challenges conventional wisdom and beckons further investigation into the whimsical and whimsical world of unintended consequences.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The examination of the curious relationship between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Belarus has elicited a variety of responses from the academic community. Smith et al. (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of beauty service employment trends in the United States, uncovering intriguing patterns in the spatial distribution of manicurists and pedicurists. Their work laid the groundwork for further investigations into the potential ramifications of such employment patterns on international energy consumption.
Doe and Jones (2018) expanded upon this foundation by delving into the historical background of LPG usage in Eastern European countries. Their meticulous examination of energy consumption dynamics shed light on the complexities of LPG demand in Belarus and its neighboring regions. This study provided valuable context for the unexpected correlation discovered in the present research, prompting contemplation of the broader societal implications of beauty services and energy usage.
Turning to non-fiction publications, "The Economics of Beauty: An Analysis of Market Forces in Cosmetology" by White (2019) offers a thought-provoking exploration of the economic forces at play within the beauty industry. While White's work primarily focuses on domestic market dynamics, its insights into the labor market and consumer behavior are relevant to the examination of manicurist and pedicurist employment in the unique context of Kentucky. Additionally, "Gasoline and Glamour: Unraveling the Conundrum of Unlikely Correlations" by Gray (2017) presents a compelling analysis of unexpected confluences in economic data, providing a theoretical framework for interpreting the surprising link between beauty services and energy consumption.
In the realm of fiction, the works of Gabriel García Márquez, particularly "One Hundred Years of Solitude" and "Love in the Time of Cholera," evoke a sense of interconnectedness and serendipitous occurrences that resonate with the inexplicable correlation under scrutiny. While obviously not directly related to the subject at hand, the themes of interwoven destinies and the whims of fate permeate these literary works, inviting contemplation of the enigmatic connections that permeate our world.
Furthermore, recent social media discourse has offered intriguing anecdotes that may shed light on the unconventional correlation being investigated. A user on a popular platform expressed astonishment at the simultaneous increase in nail salon openings in Kentucky and LPG shipments to Belarus, humorously musing about a potential "manicure-induced energy boom." While lighthearted in nature, such observations underscore the public's fascination with the unexpected intersections of seemingly unrelated phenomena, illustrating the broader cultural relevance of this research inquiry.
As the examination of this singular correlation unfolds, it becomes apparent that the intersections of beauty services and energy consumption yield a rich tapestry of comedic potential and intellectual stimulation. The obscure connections between manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and LPG usage in Belarus beckon the scholarly community to delve into the whimsical and oftentimes comical nuances of causality, reminding us that in the labyrinthine landscape of data analysis, surprises lurk around every statistical corner.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis unveiled a surprising and robust correlation between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Belarus for the period from 2003 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.7854890 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation suggests that as the number of manicurists and pedicurists in the Bluegrass State increased, so did the consumption of LPG in the distant land of Belarus.
The observed relationship was further bolstered by an r-squared value of 0.6169930, demonstrating that approximately 61.7% of the variation in LPG consumption in Belarus can be explained by changes in the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky. It appears that the vibrant nail care industry in Kentucky may have unforeseen implications for energy consumption in a land known for its potatoes and rich history.
Furthermore, the statistical significance of the correlation was confirmed by a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the likelihood of this relationship occurring purely by chance is exceedingly low. It seems that the bond between manicurists, pedicurists, and LPG consumption is not a mere statistical fluke but a genuine phenomenon deserving of scholarly attention.
To visually capture the essence of this remarkable correlation, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) was constructed, depicting the striking positive relationship between the number of beauty professionals in Kentucky and LPG consumption in Belarus. The scatterplot unmistakably illustrates the strong association between these variables and serves as a visual testament to the unexpected interplay between beauty services and energy dynamics.
In conclusion, the astonishing correlation between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and LPG consumption in Belarus challenges conventional wisdom and beckons further exploration into the peculiar and capricious interconnections within the fabric of our world. This unlikely pairing of variables not only highlights the whimsicality of empirical inquiry but also underscores the endless potential for delightful discoveries in the unlikeliest of places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study offer a fascinating glimpse into the mysterious world of statistical relationships, where the unexpected convergence of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky with liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) consumption in Belarus tantalizes the imagination and defies conventional logic. Our results support prior research that has hinted at the complex web of connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena, such as the spatial distribution of beauty service professionals and energy consumption dynamics. Building upon the foundation laid by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018), who delved into the spatial distribution of manicurists and pedicurists and the historical context of LPG usage in Belarus, our study verifies and amplifies the previously hinted connections, providing empirical evidence for these enigmatic correlations.

The inconspicuous thread tying the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky to LPG consumption in Belarus, as depicted in our results, may seem counterintuitive at first glance. However, the statistical robustness of the correlation coefficient and the convincing r-squared value substantiate the magnitude and explanatory power of this inexplicable association. These statistical parameters lend empirical weight to the notion that the vibrant nail care industry in Kentucky exerts an unforeseen influence on the energy consumption patterns of a nation renowned for its agricultural prowess and historical heritage. This unexpected correlation invites speculation on the potential mechanisms underlying the interplay of beauty service employment trends and energy dynamics, presenting a fruitful avenue for further exploration.

The whimsical and often comical nature of this connection echoes the theoretical insights of Gray (2017), who eloquently expounded upon unexpected confluences in economic data, ultimately laying a theoretical groundwork for interpreting the unlikely link between beauty services and energy consumption. Moreover, the public's humorous musings about the "manicure-induced energy boom," as encountered in social media discourse, lend a lighthearted whimsy to the serious academic inquiry at hand, reinforcing the cultural reverberations of this surprising correlation.

As we navigate the labyrinthine landscape of empirical inquiry, the serendipitous unveiling of unexpected relationships serves as a reminder that both the comic and cosmic intertwine in the pursuit of knowledge. The unfurling quest to uncover the hidden tapestry of causality offers a rich terrain for intellectual stimulation and wry amusement, exemplifying the delightful discoveries that lurk within the subtle nuances of quantitative analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Belarus. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Polishing Connections: The Surprising Link Between Manicurists and Pedicurists in Kentucky and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Belarus"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study examines the perplexing relationship between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in the Bluegrass State of Kentucky and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in the distant land of Belarus. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.7854890 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were calculated for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2021. The findings of this research both tantalize and confound, raising questions about the potential unforeseen connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This unconventional correlation challenges conventional wisdom and beckons further investigation into the whimsical and whimsical world of unintended consequences.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the grand tapestry of the universe, where the threads of causality weave an intricate and often perplexing pattern, lie the enigmatic connections between disparate phenomena. Some connections are intuitive and easily explicable, like the correlation between ice cream sales and sunburns. But others, like the relationship between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Belarus, offer a more confounding puzzle.
As we embark on this scholarly journey, we find ourselves at the intersection of beauty services and energy consumption, a junction that might seem as incongruous as a rare isotope attending a ball at the molecular level. Yet, armed with the tools of statistical analysis and a healthy dose of curiosity, we delve into the realm of numerical data to illuminate this intriguing correlation.
The notion of analyzing the employment of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky, a state renowned for its horse racing and bourbon, alongside the consumption of LPG in Belarus, a land rich in history and potatoes, may seem like a departure from traditional research pursuits. However, as practitioners of empirical inquiry, we are duty-bound to explore the unexpected and the quirky, for it is often in these uncharted territories that the most captivating discoveries await.
With tongue firmly in cheek and minds brimming with statistical rigor, we embark upon an odyssey of correlation and causation, seeking to unveil the underlying dynamics of this whimsical connection. It is our fervent hope that this endeavor will not only yield insights into the peculiar interplay of seemingly unrelated variables but also inject a dash of levity and delight into the often sober realm of academic discourse.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis unveiled a surprising and robust correlation between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Belarus for the period from 2003 to 2021. The correlation coefficient of 0.7854890 indicates a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This correlation suggests that as the number of manicurists and pedicurists in the Bluegrass State increased, so did the consumption of LPG in the distant land of Belarus.
The observed relationship was further bolstered by an r-squared value of 0.6169930, demonstrating that approximately 61.7% of the variation in LPG consumption in Belarus can be explained by changes in the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky. It appears that the vibrant nail care industry in Kentucky may have unforeseen implications for energy consumption in a land known for its potatoes and rich history.
Furthermore, the statistical significance of the correlation was confirmed by a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the likelihood of this relationship occurring purely by chance is exceedingly low. It seems that the bond between manicurists, pedicurists, and LPG consumption is not a mere statistical fluke but a genuine phenomenon deserving of scholarly attention.
To visually capture the essence of this remarkable correlation, a scatterplot (Fig. 1) was constructed, depicting the striking positive relationship between the number of beauty professionals in Kentucky and LPG consumption in Belarus. The scatterplot unmistakably illustrates the strong association between these variables and serves as a visual testament to the unexpected interplay between beauty services and energy dynamics.
In conclusion, the astonishing correlation between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and LPG consumption in Belarus challenges conventional wisdom and beckons further exploration into the peculiar and capricious interconnections within the fabric of our world. This unlikely pairing of variables not only highlights the whimsicality of empirical inquiry but also underscores the endless potential for delightful discoveries in the unlikeliest of places.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the confounding relationship between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Belarus has illuminated a quirky and unexpected correlation. Despite the geographical and occupational disparity between these variables, our rigorous statistical analysis has revealed a robust and statistically significant link, proving once and for all that statistical oddities can be nail-bitingly fascinating. The positive correlation coefficient of 0.7854890 and the r-squared value of 0.6169930 unequivocally demonstrate that the vibrant nail care industry in the Bluegrass State exerts a palpable influence on LPG consumption in a land known for its history and potatoes. This unlikely duo of variables has shattered the expectations of conventional research pursuits, urging us to embrace the delightful unpredictability of the scientific realm.

Our study, like an eccentric chemistry experiment, has underscored the endlessly surprising nature of empirical inquiry, reminding us that the most captivating discoveries often arise from the most peculiar pairings. As we bid adieu to this whimsical exploration, we are compelled to acknowledge the whimsical and capricious nature of the world of statistics and data. The correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables stands as a testament to the boundless potential for whimsy and wonder in the often staid domain of scholarly research. Therefore, with a twinkle in our eyes and a chuckle in our hearts, we assert that further investigation into the connection between manicurists, pedicurists, and LPG consumption in Belarus is unnecessary – for in the world of statistical amusement, this correlation stands ever so beautifully and unequivocally established.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Polishing Connections: The Surprising Link Between Manicurists and Pedicurists in Kentucky and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Belarus. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Transcontinental Cosmetology and Green Energy Usage


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Polishing Connections: The Surprising Link Between Manicurists and Pedicurists in Kentucky and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Belarus. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Transnational Nailcare Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Polishing Connections: The Surprising Link Between Manicurists and Pedicurists in Kentucky and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Consumption in Belarus with an abstract of This study examines the perplexing relationship between the number of manicurists and pedicurists in the Bluegrass State of Kentucky and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in the distant land of Belarus. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, a correlation coefficient of 0.7854890 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 were calculated for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2021. The findings of this research both tantalize and confound, raising questions about the potential unforeseen connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. This unconventional correlation challenges conventional wisdom and beckons further investigation into the whimsical and whimsical world of unintended consequences.

ChatGPT:

manicurists, pedicurists, Kentucky, liquefied petroleum gas consumption, Belarus, correlation coefficient, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Energy Information Administration, unconventional correlation, unintended consequences

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky

Liquefied petroleum gas used in Belarus
Detailed data title: Volume of liquefied petroleum gas used consumed in Belarus in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Liquefied petroleum gas used in Belarus

Correlation r = 0.7854890 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6169930 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 61.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Liquefied petroleum gas used in Belarus) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky) over the 19 years from 2003 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.7E-5. 0.0000674796736954460000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.79 in 0.0067% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 14,819 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.52, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky (Laborers)24016016012030029034019022020018020014013060807030150
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Belarus (Million Barrels/Day)7.529397.776887.804128.16438.770269.152638.074647.552217.805857.454236.700116.01793554.608224.417534.258634.290414.29041




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([240,160,160,120,300,290,340,190,220,200,180,200,140,130,60,80,70,30,150,])
array_2 = np.array([7.52939,7.77688,7.80412,8.1643,8.77026,9.15263,8.07464,7.55221,7.80585,7.45423,6.70011,6.01793,5,5,4.60822,4.41753,4.25863,4.29041,4.29041,])
array_1_name = "The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kentucky"
array_2_name = "Liquefied petroleum gas used in Belarus"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 3148 · Black Variable ID: 8495 · Red Variable ID: 24188
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0