about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,147 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of cartographers in Arkansas and the second variable is Google searches for 'Britney Spears'.  The chart goes from 2008 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the map-making population in Arkansas dwindled, there was a corresponding decline in the state's ability to chart Britney Spears' success. Without enough cartographers to map out her iconic pop journey, it seems Britney's search popularity hit a bit of a geographic low. It appears the correlation between Arkansas cartographers and Britney's Google searches truly was... the plot to her own downfall.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] Create an image where a map of Arkansas is depicted. Initially, the map is detailed and features numerous cartographers marked on it. However, as the map progresses, the level of detail diminishes, and the number of cartographers decreases, symbolizing the decline in accurate maps. Meanwhile, people are shown using their smartphones to search for 'Britney Spears' on Google, reflecting the shift in focus from maps to seeking direction from the pop star. The image should capture the comical contrast between the dwindling accuracy of the map and the increasing reliance on Britney Spears for inspiration and guidance. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for 'Britney Spears'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A scene from Skyrim Hyper-realistic a funny image you would see on reddit Glitch art Realistic
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for 'Britney Spears', in the following situation: Because as the number of cartographers in Arkansas decreases, so does the availability of accurate maps, leading to a decrease in the ability to navigate. This lack of direction causes people to feel lost, and some of them turn to searching for guidance and inspiration from Britney Spears, whose song lyrics are full of references to finding one's way and overcoming challenges. So, as the maps disappear, so does the need to search for Britney Spears.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Imagine a map of Arkansas with fewer and fewer cartographers marked on it, symbolizing the decrease in accurate maps available. As the map becomes less detailed and harder to navigate, people are shown searching 'Britney Spears' on Google for inspiration and guidance, reflecting the shift in focus from maps to seeking direction from the pop star.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a map of Arkansas with fewer and fewer cartographers marked on it, symbolizing the decrease in accurate maps available. As the map becomes less detailed and harder to navigate, people are shown searching 'Britney Spears' on Google for inspiration and guidance, reflecting the shift in focus from maps to seeking direction from the pop star. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] Create an image where a map of Arkansas is depicted. Initially, the map is detailed and features numerous cartographers marked on it. However, as the map progresses, the level of detail diminishes, and the number of cartographers decreases, symbolizing the decline in accurate maps. Meanwhile, people are shown using their smartphones to search for 'Britney Spears' on Google, reflecting the shift in focus from maps to seeking direction from the pop star. The image should capture the comical contrast between the dwindling accuracy of the map and the increasing reliance on Britney Spears for inspiration and guidance.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of cartographers in Arkansas caused Britney Spears (Google searches for 'Britney Spears') to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Cartographers in Arkansas and the Curious Case of Britney Spears

The Journal of Geographical Oddities and Pop Culture Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for 'Britney Spears'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8434623 and p < 0.01 for 2008 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Cartographers in Arkansas and the Curious Case of Britney Spears

[[ABSTRACT]]
Geographers have long been fascinated by the intersection of human behavior and spatial patterns, and our study delves into the intriguing connection between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for the pop icon, Britney Spears. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends from 2008 to 2022, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8434623 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a potential relationship between the spatial distribution of cartographers and public interest in the 'Queen of Pop'. This paper not only offers an unprecedented insight into the whimsical world of cartography and pop culture, but also highlights the need for further studies to unravel the enigmatic ties that bind these seemingly disparate phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for 'Britney Spears'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cartographers in Arkansas and the Curious Case of Britney Spears

[[ABSTRACT]]
Geographers have long been fascinated by the intersection of human behavior and spatial patterns, and our study delves into the intriguing connection between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for the pop icon, Britney Spears. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends from 2008 to 2022, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8434623 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a potential relationship between the spatial distribution of cartographers and public interest in the 'Queen of Pop'. This paper not only offers an unprecedented insight into the whimsical world of cartography and pop culture, but also highlights the need for further studies to unravel the enigmatic ties that bind these seemingly disparate phenomena.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

In the labyrinth of academic research, one often finds oneself spiraling down uncharted paths, stumbling upon unexpected correlations and peculiar patterns. Our journey takes us to the beguiling realm where the land of cartography and the kingdom of pop culture intersect - an intersection that seems as improbable as a blizzard in the Sahara.

Geographers, equipped with their trusty maps and insatiable curiosity, have long sought to unravel the mysteries of spatial relationships. Our particular foray into this domain leads us to the state of Arkansas, where we chance upon a cohort of cartographers diligently plotting the lay of the land. Little did they know that their endeavors might hold the key to unraveling the enigma of the 'Britney Spears' phenomenon, a puzzle as confounding as a Rubik's Cube in the hands of a toddler.

In this paper, we endeavor to shed light on the correlation between the number of cartographers in the quaint state of Arkansas and the frequency of Google searches for the 'Toxic' songstress. With data in hand and statistical tools at our disposal, we delved into the realm of spatial patterns and public intrigue. What emerged from this scholarly adventure was a correlation coefficient as remarkable as a unicorn sighting - 0.8434623, accompanied by a significance level so pronounced, it might as well have winked at us and said, "P < 0.01, folks!"

Our findings not only underscore the curious connection between cartographers and the sway of pop culture, but also illuminate the whimsical tapestry of human behavior that weaves together seemingly unrelated phenomena. Perhaps, in this voyage of scholarly discovery, we are reminded that even the most improbable associations can hold the delicate threads of insights waiting to be unraveled.

Hold on to your compasses and your love for '90s pop hits as we embark on this scholarly escapade through the mystifying meeting point of mapping and melodies!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for 'Britney Spears'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cartographers in Arkansas and the Curious Case of Britney Spears

[[ABSTRACT]]
Geographers have long been fascinated by the intersection of human behavior and spatial patterns, and our study delves into the intriguing connection between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for the pop icon, Britney Spears. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends from 2008 to 2022, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8434623 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a potential relationship between the spatial distribution of cartographers and public interest in the 'Queen of Pop'. This paper not only offers an unprecedented insight into the whimsical world of cartography and pop culture, but also highlights the need for further studies to unravel the enigmatic ties that bind these seemingly disparate phenomena.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the labyrinth of academic research, one often finds oneself spiraling down uncharted paths, stumbling upon unexpected correlations and peculiar patterns. Our journey takes us to the beguiling realm where the land of cartography and the kingdom of pop culture intersect - an intersection that seems as improbable as a blizzard in the Sahara.
Geographers, equipped with their trusty maps and insatiable curiosity, have long sought to unravel the mysteries of spatial relationships. Our particular foray into this domain leads us to the state of Arkansas, where we chance upon a cohort of cartographers diligently plotting the lay of the land. Little did they know that their endeavors might hold the key to unraveling the enigma of the 'Britney Spears' phenomenon, a puzzle as confounding as a Rubik's Cube in the hands of a toddler.
In this paper, we endeavor to shed light on the correlation between the number of cartographers in the quaint state of Arkansas and the frequency of Google searches for the 'Toxic' songstress. With data in hand and statistical tools at our disposal, we delved into the realm of spatial patterns and public intrigue. What emerged from this scholarly adventure was a correlation coefficient as remarkable as a unicorn sighting - 0.8434623, accompanied by a significance level so pronounced, it might as well have winked at us and said, "P < 0.01, folks!"
Our findings not only underscore the curious connection between cartographers and the sway of pop culture, but also illuminate the whimsical tapestry of human behavior that weaves together seemingly unrelated phenomena. Perhaps, in this voyage of scholarly discovery, we are reminded that even the most improbable associations can hold the delicate threads of insights waiting to be unraveled.
Hold on to your compasses and your love for '90s pop hits as we embark on this scholarly escapade through the mystifying meeting point of mapping and melodies!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between cartography and popular culture is a topic that has not received extensive attention in scholarly literature, yet our curiosity was piqued by the enigmatic connection between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for the pop sensation, Britney Spears. As we navigate through existing research on spatial patterns and cultural phenomena, we find ourselves in a landscape that is as varied and convoluted as the career of Ms. Spears herself.

In "Geospatial Analysis of the Impact of Cartographers on Public Interest in Popular Icons" by Smith et al., the authors delve into the intriguing realm of spatial analytics, attempting to draw connections between professions and public intrigue. While the study primarily focuses on the impact of cartographers on the interest in various popular icons, the findings offer a tantalizing glimpse into the potential influence of mapmakers on the fascination with celebrities.

Moving from the realm of academia to more practical applications, the work of Doe and Jones in their book "Mapping 101: An Introduction to Cartography" provides a comprehensive overview of cartographic methods and their relevance to modern society. While the authors do not explicitly address the correlation between cartographers and Google searches for Britney Spears, the principles and techniques outlined in the book form the foundation of our understanding of cartography's potential impact on popular culture.

Shifting gears to explore related non-fiction literature, "Maphead: Charting the Wide, Weird World of Geography Wonks" by Ken Jennings offers a lighthearted yet informative exploration of the world of cartography and geographic curiosity. Although Jennings' work does not directly touch upon the correlation between cartographers in Arkansas and Britney Spears searches, the spirit of geographical inquisitiveness pervading the book mirrors our own insatiable curiosity about this peculiar phenomenon.

In the realm of fiction, "The Map of Love" by Ahdaf Soueif and "Maps for Lost Lovers" by Nadeem Aslam present narratives intertwining themes of love, loss, and, in a tangential sense, geographic representations. While these literary works do not directly address the connection between cartographers and pop culture, their evocative portrayal of human emotions and relationships serves as a poignant reminder of the intricate interplay between personal narratives and geographical landscapes.

In our pursuit of understanding the cartographer-Britney Spears correlation, we also turned to popular culture references for inspiration and insight. Through careful analysis of episodes from "Dora the Explorer," we attempted to glean subtle nuances of geography and spatial cognition. However, our findings primarily led us to conclude that Swiper the Fox's penchant for thievery is as persistent as the curiosity driving our own scholarly pursuits.

As we navigate this body of literature, we are confronted with a peculiar blend of serious inquiry and whimsical curiosity, a juxtaposition mirrored in the surprising correlation we have uncovered. Our quest to unravel the mystery of the cartographer-Britney Spears connection continues, buoyed by the humorous twists and turns encountered in our scholarly escapade.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for 'Britney Spears'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2008 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cartographers in Arkansas and the Curious Case of Britney Spears

[[ABSTRACT]]
Geographers have long been fascinated by the intersection of human behavior and spatial patterns, and our study delves into the intriguing connection between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for the pop icon, Britney Spears. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends from 2008 to 2022, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8434623 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a potential relationship between the spatial distribution of cartographers and public interest in the 'Queen of Pop'. This paper not only offers an unprecedented insight into the whimsical world of cartography and pop culture, but also highlights the need for further studies to unravel the enigmatic ties that bind these seemingly disparate phenomena.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the labyrinth of academic research, one often finds oneself spiraling down uncharted paths, stumbling upon unexpected correlations and peculiar patterns. Our journey takes us to the beguiling realm where the land of cartography and the kingdom of pop culture intersect - an intersection that seems as improbable as a blizzard in the Sahara.
Geographers, equipped with their trusty maps and insatiable curiosity, have long sought to unravel the mysteries of spatial relationships. Our particular foray into this domain leads us to the state of Arkansas, where we chance upon a cohort of cartographers diligently plotting the lay of the land. Little did they know that their endeavors might hold the key to unraveling the enigma of the 'Britney Spears' phenomenon, a puzzle as confounding as a Rubik's Cube in the hands of a toddler.
In this paper, we endeavor to shed light on the correlation between the number of cartographers in the quaint state of Arkansas and the frequency of Google searches for the 'Toxic' songstress. With data in hand and statistical tools at our disposal, we delved into the realm of spatial patterns and public intrigue. What emerged from this scholarly adventure was a correlation coefficient as remarkable as a unicorn sighting - 0.8434623, accompanied by a significance level so pronounced, it might as well have winked at us and said, "P < 0.01, folks!"
Our findings not only underscore the curious connection between cartographers and the sway of pop culture, but also illuminate the whimsical tapestry of human behavior that weaves together seemingly unrelated phenomena. Perhaps, in this voyage of scholarly discovery, we are reminded that even the most improbable associations can hold the delicate threads of insights waiting to be unraveled.
Hold on to your compasses and your love for '90s pop hits as we embark on this scholarly escapade through the mystifying meeting point of mapping and melodies!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic connection between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for Britney Spears, our research team navigated through a maze of data sources, blending statistical tools with a hint of whimsy. We embarked on this scholarly escapade armed with data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends, spanning the years 2008 to 2022, akin to intrepid explorers charting uncharted territories.

The first phase of our methodology involved trawling through the Bureau of Labor Statistics' treasure trove of employment data to meticulously track the number of cartographers in the charming state of Arkansas. With a sense of adventure akin to an explorer setting sail, we traversed through labor market reports and employment surveys, uncovering the spatial distribution of these map-makers with the tenacity of a seeker hunting for buried treasure. We then adorned our metaphorical cartographic hats, plotting these numbers onto our figurative maps with the precision of a well-calibrated compass.

Simultaneously, we delved into the vast sea of Google searches through the lens of Google Trends, aiming to capture the ebbs and flows of public interest in the illustrious figure of Britney Spears. Like digital cartographers charting the tides of the virtual realm, we meticulously tracked the frequency and geographical variations of searches related to the pop icon, capturing the ever-shifting contours of her online presence with the fervor of a fan collecting concert memorabilia.

With our data in hand, we harnessed the power of correlation analysis, deploying statistical tools akin to compasses guiding us through this scholarly odyssey. Our journey through these statistical thickets involved calculating correlation coefficients, whose findings emerged with a significance level as unmistakable as a neon sign in the desert. As we navigated this statistical terrain, we also conducted various sensitivity analyses to ensure the robustness and reliability of our findings, as thorough as an archeologist painstakingly preserving ancient artifacts.

Our intersection of data from the land of cartography and the kingdom of pop culture allowed us to uncover an unexpected correlation coefficient of 0.8434623, echoing through the academic halls like a resounding applause. This revelation, akin to a surprising twist in a pop ballad, opened the door to a new realm of inquiry, inspiring further investigations into the curious connections that bind these seemingly disparate phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for 'Britney Spears'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Google Trends .

For the time period 2008 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8434623, r-squared of 0.7114287, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Cartographers in Arkansas and the Curious Case of Britney Spears

[[ABSTRACT]]
Geographers have long been fascinated by the intersection of human behavior and spatial patterns, and our study delves into the intriguing connection between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for the pop icon, Britney Spears. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends from 2008 to 2022, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8434623 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a potential relationship between the spatial distribution of cartographers and public interest in the 'Queen of Pop'. This paper not only offers an unprecedented insight into the whimsical world of cartography and pop culture, but also highlights the need for further studies to unravel the enigmatic ties that bind these seemingly disparate phenomena.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the labyrinth of academic research, one often finds oneself spiraling down uncharted paths, stumbling upon unexpected correlations and peculiar patterns. Our journey takes us to the beguiling realm where the land of cartography and the kingdom of pop culture intersect - an intersection that seems as improbable as a blizzard in the Sahara.
Geographers, equipped with their trusty maps and insatiable curiosity, have long sought to unravel the mysteries of spatial relationships. Our particular foray into this domain leads us to the state of Arkansas, where we chance upon a cohort of cartographers diligently plotting the lay of the land. Little did they know that their endeavors might hold the key to unraveling the enigma of the 'Britney Spears' phenomenon, a puzzle as confounding as a Rubik's Cube in the hands of a toddler.
In this paper, we endeavor to shed light on the correlation between the number of cartographers in the quaint state of Arkansas and the frequency of Google searches for the 'Toxic' songstress. With data in hand and statistical tools at our disposal, we delved into the realm of spatial patterns and public intrigue. What emerged from this scholarly adventure was a correlation coefficient as remarkable as a unicorn sighting - 0.8434623, accompanied by a significance level so pronounced, it might as well have winked at us and said, "P < 0.01, folks!"
Our findings not only underscore the curious connection between cartographers and the sway of pop culture, but also illuminate the whimsical tapestry of human behavior that weaves together seemingly unrelated phenomena. Perhaps, in this voyage of scholarly discovery, we are reminded that even the most improbable associations can hold the delicate threads of insights waiting to be unraveled.
Hold on to your compasses and your love for '90s pop hits as we embark on this scholarly escapade through the mystifying meeting point of mapping and melodies!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

We uncovered a remarkable correlation between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for the one and only Britney Spears, known for her chart-topping hits and iconic performances. Our rigorous statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8434623, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.7114287 further emphasizes the robustness of this connection, implying that approximately 71% of the variability in Google searches for Britney Spears can be explained by the number of cartographers in Arkansas. With a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings suggest that this correlation is not just a random occurrence, but a bona fide relationship worthy of closer scrutiny.

Figure 1 displays a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the striking correlation between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and the frequency of Google searches for Britney Spears. The data points coalesce in a manner reminiscent of a well-orchestrated symphony, with each dot harmoniously contributing to the overarching trend. The figure speaks volumes about the surprising connection we stumbled upon during this scholarly escapade, much like discovering a hidden track on a beloved album.

Our results raise intriguing questions about the underlying mechanisms that tie cartography and pop culture together, prompting us to ponder whether the distribution of cartographers somehow influences public interest in this iconic pop sensation. While some may view this correlation as improbable as finding a needle in a haystack, our findings beckon us to embrace the unexpected and acknowledge that the wondrous tapestry of human behavior knows no bounds.

In sum, this correlation prompts us to consider the possibility of a spatially-driven influence on the public's intrigue with the 'Oops!...I Did It Again' songstress, leaving us with a curious case that begs for further investigation. As we delve deeper into this captivating conundrum, we are reminded that the world of research is as unpredictable as a surprise plot twist, offering unexpected revelations at every turn.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for 'Britney Spears'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Cartographers in Arkansas and the Curious Case of Britney Spears

[[ABSTRACT]]
Geographers have long been fascinated by the intersection of human behavior and spatial patterns, and our study delves into the intriguing connection between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for the pop icon, Britney Spears. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends from 2008 to 2022, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8434623 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a potential relationship between the spatial distribution of cartographers and public interest in the 'Queen of Pop'. This paper not only offers an unprecedented insight into the whimsical world of cartography and pop culture, but also highlights the need for further studies to unravel the enigmatic ties that bind these seemingly disparate phenomena.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between cartography and popular culture is a topic that has not received extensive attention in scholarly literature, yet our curiosity was piqued by the enigmatic connection between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for the pop sensation, Britney Spears. As we navigate through existing research on spatial patterns and cultural phenomena, we find ourselves in a landscape that is as varied and convoluted as the career of Ms. Spears herself.
In "Geospatial Analysis of the Impact of Cartographers on Public Interest in Popular Icons" by Smith et al., the authors delve into the intriguing realm of spatial analytics, attempting to draw connections between professions and public intrigue. While the study primarily focuses on the impact of cartographers on the interest in various popular icons, the findings offer a tantalizing glimpse into the potential influence of mapmakers on the fascination with celebrities.
Moving from the realm of academia to more practical applications, the work of Doe and Jones in their book "Mapping 101: An Introduction to Cartography" provides a comprehensive overview of cartographic methods and their relevance to modern society. While the authors do not explicitly address the correlation between cartographers and Google searches for Britney Spears, the principles and techniques outlined in the book form the foundation of our understanding of cartography's potential impact on popular culture.
Shifting gears to explore related non-fiction literature, "Maphead: Charting the Wide, Weird World of Geography Wonks" by Ken Jennings offers a lighthearted yet informative exploration of the world of cartography and geographic curiosity. Although Jennings' work does not directly touch upon the correlation between cartographers in Arkansas and Britney Spears searches, the spirit of geographical inquisitiveness pervading the book mirrors our own insatiable curiosity about this peculiar phenomenon.
In the realm of fiction, "The Map of Love" by Ahdaf Soueif and "Maps for Lost Lovers" by Nadeem Aslam present narratives intertwining themes of love, loss, and, in a tangential sense, geographic representations. While these literary works do not directly address the connection between cartographers and pop culture, their evocative portrayal of human emotions and relationships serves as a poignant reminder of the intricate interplay between personal narratives and geographical landscapes.
In our pursuit of understanding the cartographer-Britney Spears correlation, we also turned to popular culture references for inspiration and insight. Through careful analysis of episodes from "Dora the Explorer," we attempted to glean subtle nuances of geography and spatial cognition. However, our findings primarily led us to conclude that Swiper the Fox's penchant for thievery is as persistent as the curiosity driving our own scholarly pursuits.
As we navigate this body of literature, we are confronted with a peculiar blend of serious inquiry and whimsical curiosity, a juxtaposition mirrored in the surprising correlation we have uncovered. Our quest to unravel the mystery of the cartographer-Britney Spears connection continues, buoyed by the humorous twists and turns encountered in our scholarly escapade.

[[RESULTS]]
We uncovered a remarkable correlation between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for the one and only Britney Spears, known for her chart-topping hits and iconic performances. Our rigorous statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8434623, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.7114287 further emphasizes the robustness of this connection, implying that approximately 71% of the variability in Google searches for Britney Spears can be explained by the number of cartographers in Arkansas. With a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings suggest that this correlation is not just a random occurrence, but a bona fide relationship worthy of closer scrutiny.
Figure 1 displays a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the striking correlation between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and the frequency of Google searches for Britney Spears. The data points coalesce in a manner reminiscent of a well-orchestrated symphony, with each dot harmoniously contributing to the overarching trend. The figure speaks volumes about the surprising connection we stumbled upon during this scholarly escapade, much like discovering a hidden track on a beloved album.
Our results raise intriguing questions about the underlying mechanisms that tie cartography and pop culture together, prompting us to ponder whether the distribution of cartographers somehow influences public interest in this iconic pop sensation. While some may view this correlation as improbable as finding a needle in a haystack, our findings beckon us to embrace the unexpected and acknowledge that the wondrous tapestry of human behavior knows no bounds.
In sum, this correlation prompts us to consider the possibility of a spatially-driven influence on the public's intrigue with the 'Oops!...I Did It Again' songstress, leaving us with a curious case that begs for further investigation. As we delve deeper into this captivating conundrum, we are reminded that the world of research is as unpredictable as a surprise plot twist, offering unexpected revelations at every turn.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The ramifications of our findings resonate with the spirit of unexpected synergies, akin to stumbling upon a rare Pokémon while traversing uncharted territories. Our discovery of a substantial correlation between cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for Britney Spears appears as enigmatic as an unsolved riddle, prompting us to ponder the hidden forces at play in the whimsical world of spatial patterns and pop culture phenomena.

Returning to the lighthearted but resilient literature review, Smith et al.'s pioneering foray into the impact of cartographers on public interest in popular icons reverberates with newfound significance in light of our own revelations. What was once a speculative notion has now been substantiated by our robust correlation coefficient, lending credence to the tantalizing glimpses offered by Smith et al.'s exploratory work. It appears that the influence of mapmakers on the fascination with celebrities may not just be the stuff of whimsy, but a tangible force shaping public intrigue.

In a similarly fortuitous turn, our unexpected correlation breathes life into the curious blend of serious inquiry and whimsical curiosity that characterized our pursuit, mirroring the perplexing confluence of cartography and Britney Spears in this study. The humorous twists and turns encountered in our scholarly escapade now present themselves as integral components of the puzzle, underscoring the need for scholarly pursuits that embrace the unexpected with open arms.

As we ponder the potential spatially-driven influence on the public's fascination with the 'Queen of Pop,' it becomes increasingly apparent that our findings not only prompt further investigation but also underscore the multifaceted nature of human behavior. The melodic harmony depicted in our scatterplot, reminiscent of a well-orchestrated symphony, hints at the intricate interplay between geographic patterns and cultural intrigue, much like the symbiotic relationship between melody and rhythm in Ms. Spears' hit songs.

In summary, our research unearths a curious case that challenges traditional boundaries and beckons the scholarly community to expand the horizons of inquiry. As we navigate this captivating conundrum, we are reminded that the world of research is akin to a treasure trove brimming with unexpected revelations, waiting to be unearthed amidst the serendipitous melodies of statistical harmonies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for 'Britney Spears'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Cartographers in Arkansas and the Curious Case of Britney Spears

[[ABSTRACT]]
Geographers have long been fascinated by the intersection of human behavior and spatial patterns, and our study delves into the intriguing connection between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for the pop icon, Britney Spears. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends from 2008 to 2022, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8434623 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a potential relationship between the spatial distribution of cartographers and public interest in the 'Queen of Pop'. This paper not only offers an unprecedented insight into the whimsical world of cartography and pop culture, but also highlights the need for further studies to unravel the enigmatic ties that bind these seemingly disparate phenomena.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the labyrinth of academic research, one often finds oneself spiraling down uncharted paths, stumbling upon unexpected correlations and peculiar patterns. Our journey takes us to the beguiling realm where the land of cartography and the kingdom of pop culture intersect - an intersection that seems as improbable as a blizzard in the Sahara.
Geographers, equipped with their trusty maps and insatiable curiosity, have long sought to unravel the mysteries of spatial relationships. Our particular foray into this domain leads us to the state of Arkansas, where we chance upon a cohort of cartographers diligently plotting the lay of the land. Little did they know that their endeavors might hold the key to unraveling the enigma of the 'Britney Spears' phenomenon, a puzzle as confounding as a Rubik's Cube in the hands of a toddler.
In this paper, we endeavor to shed light on the correlation between the number of cartographers in the quaint state of Arkansas and the frequency of Google searches for the 'Toxic' songstress. With data in hand and statistical tools at our disposal, we delved into the realm of spatial patterns and public intrigue. What emerged from this scholarly adventure was a correlation coefficient as remarkable as a unicorn sighting - 0.8434623, accompanied by a significance level so pronounced, it might as well have winked at us and said, "P < 0.01, folks!"
Our findings not only underscore the curious connection between cartographers and the sway of pop culture, but also illuminate the whimsical tapestry of human behavior that weaves together seemingly unrelated phenomena. Perhaps, in this voyage of scholarly discovery, we are reminded that even the most improbable associations can hold the delicate threads of insights waiting to be unraveled.
Hold on to your compasses and your love for '90s pop hits as we embark on this scholarly escapade through the mystifying meeting point of mapping and melodies!

[[RESULTS]]
We uncovered a remarkable correlation between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for the one and only Britney Spears, known for her chart-topping hits and iconic performances. Our rigorous statistical analysis revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8434623, indicating a strong positive relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. The r-squared value of 0.7114287 further emphasizes the robustness of this connection, implying that approximately 71% of the variability in Google searches for Britney Spears can be explained by the number of cartographers in Arkansas. With a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings suggest that this correlation is not just a random occurrence, but a bona fide relationship worthy of closer scrutiny.
Figure 1 displays a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the striking correlation between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and the frequency of Google searches for Britney Spears. The data points coalesce in a manner reminiscent of a well-orchestrated symphony, with each dot harmoniously contributing to the overarching trend. The figure speaks volumes about the surprising connection we stumbled upon during this scholarly escapade, much like discovering a hidden track on a beloved album.
Our results raise intriguing questions about the underlying mechanisms that tie cartography and pop culture together, prompting us to ponder whether the distribution of cartographers somehow influences public interest in this iconic pop sensation. While some may view this correlation as improbable as finding a needle in a haystack, our findings beckon us to embrace the unexpected and acknowledge that the wondrous tapestry of human behavior knows no bounds.
In sum, this correlation prompts us to consider the possibility of a spatially-driven influence on the public's intrigue with the 'Oops!...I Did It Again' songstress, leaving us with a curious case that begs for further investigation. As we delve deeper into this captivating conundrum, we are reminded that the world of research is as unpredictable as a surprise plot twist, offering unexpected revelations at every turn.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the delightful dance of data and deductions, our scholarly sojourn through the peculiar pairing of cartographers in Arkansas and the allure of Britney Spears has unraveled a correlation as captivating as a catchy chorus. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8434623 and the significant p-value of less than 0.01 have us pondering the potential influence of the map-making maestros on the public's fascination with the 'Baby One More Time' songstress. These findings highlight the whimsical interconnectedness of seemingly disparate phenomena, proving that sometimes the unlikely duets hold the most intrigue. Despite the temptation to delve deeper into this wondrously perplexing puzzle, we assert that the enigma of cartographers and Britney Spears has been sufficiently illuminated, and further research in this delightfully quirky domain may be as unnecessary as a GPS in a room full of cartographers. It seems the curious case of cartographers and Britney Spears warrants no further exploration; we bid adieu to this whimsical whirlwind of scholarly whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Cartographers in Arkansas and the Curious Case of Britney Spears. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Geographical Oddities and Pop Culture Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Cartographers in Arkansas and the Curious Case of Britney Spears. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Geographical Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Cartographers in Arkansas and the Curious Case of Britney Spears with an abstract of Geographers have long been fascinated by the intersection of human behavior and spatial patterns, and our study delves into the intriguing connection between the number of cartographers in Arkansas and Google searches for the pop icon, Britney Spears. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and Google Trends from 2008 to 2022, our research team uncovered a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.8434623 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our findings suggest a potential relationship between the spatial distribution of cartographers and public interest in the 'Queen of Pop'. This paper not only offers an unprecedented insight into the whimsical world of cartography and pop culture, but also highlights the need for further studies to unravel the enigmatic ties that bind these seemingly disparate phenomena.

ChatGPT:

cartographers, Arkansas, Britney Spears, spatial patterns, human behavior, google searches, correlation coefficient, spatial distribution, pop culture

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of cartographers in Arkansas
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of cartographers and photogrammetrists in Arkansas
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of cartographers in Arkansas

Google searches for 'Britney Spears'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'Britney Spears' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'Britney Spears'

Correlation r = 0.8434623 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7114287 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 71.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'Britney Spears') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of cartographers in Arkansas) over the 15 years from 2008 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.8E-5. 0.0000778180531705237600000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.84 in 0.0078% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 12,850 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.58, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
The number of cartographers in Arkansas (Laborers)120130601009090406060707070606050
Google searches for 'Britney Spears' (Rel. search volume)54.754524.666736.520.16672113.583311.333312.16678.758.166677.258.517.583310.4167




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([120,130,60,100,90,90,40,60,60,70,70,70,60,60,50,])
array_2 = np.array([54.75,45,24.6667,36.5,20.1667,21,13.5833,11.3333,12.1667,8.75,8.16667,7.25,8.5,17.5833,10.4167,])
array_1_name = "The number of cartographers in Arkansas"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'Britney Spears'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 3147 · Black Variable ID: 5111 · Red Variable ID: 1418
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0