about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,124 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and the second variable is Biomass power generated in Sri Lanka.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As bottled water consumption in the US rises, it leads to an influx of discarded plastic bottles. These bottles somehow make their way to Sri Lanka, where they are used as a supplemental fuel source for biomass power generation. Who knew that hydrating in the US could indirectly power homes in Sri Lanka with a splash of plastic power!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] In a sunlit, spacious kitchen in the US, a person with a concerned expression stands near the sink, filling a glass with bottled water from a case of plastic water bottles. The person is surrounded by several stacks of plastic bottles, hinting at the excessive use of single-use plastic in the household. In the distance, through the window, a massive cargo ship is seen setting sail from the US to Sri Lanka, loaded with an overwhelming amount of plastic waste. The ship is a stark reminder of the global plastic pollution issue and the exportation of waste to other countries. Transitioning to Sri Lanka, the scene shifts to a bustling recycling plant, where workers are diligently sorting through the imported plastic waste. The workers are depicted in a state of organized chaos, highlighting the human impact of dealing with the excess plastic waste from other nations. In the background of the Sri Lankan landscape, a powerful biomass power plant looms, towering over the surroundings. Plumes of steam rise from the facility, illustrating its operation fueled by the imported plastic waste. The visual emphasizes the transformation of discarded plastic into energy through advanced recycling processes. The visual depiction captures the interconnectedness of global plastic consumption, waste management, and efforts to repurpose plastic waste for sustainable energy solutions. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Biomass power generated in Sri Lanka. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Hyper-realistic Woodblock painting A photo-realistic image An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' A scene from Skyrim
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Biomass power generated in Sri Lanka, in the following situation: Because as Americans drank more bottled water, they produced more plastic waste, which was then shipped to Sri Lanka for recycling. This increase in imported plastic waste provided a greater biomass resource for power generation in Sri Lanka, leading to the increase in biomass power generation. So you could say the US bottled water consumption really fueled the biomass power in Sri Lanka!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sunny kitchen in the US, a person fills a glass with bottled water while surrounded by plastic bottles. In the distance, a cargo ship sets sail from the US to Sri Lanka with a load of plastic waste. In Sri Lanka, workers at a recycling plant sort the plastic waste, and a powerful biomass power plant looms in the background, fueled by the imported plastic waste.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In a sunny kitchen in the US, a person fills a glass with bottled water while surrounded by plastic bottles. In the distance, a cargo ship sets sail from the US to Sri Lanka with a load of plastic waste. In Sri Lanka, workers at a recycling plant sort the plastic waste, and a powerful biomass power plant looms in the background, fueled by the imported plastic waste. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ A photo-realistic image ] In a sunlit, spacious kitchen in the US, a person with a concerned expression stands near the sink, filling a glass with bottled water from a case of plastic water bottles. The person is surrounded by several stacks of plastic bottles, hinting at the excessive use of single-use plastic in the household. In the distance, through the window, a massive cargo ship is seen setting sail from the US to Sri Lanka, loaded with an overwhelming amount of plastic waste. The ship is a stark reminder of the global plastic pollution issue and the exportation of waste to other countries. Transitioning to Sri Lanka, the scene shifts to a bustling recycling plant, where workers are diligently sorting through the imported plastic waste. The workers are depicted in a state of organized chaos, highlighting the human impact of dealing with the excess plastic waste from other nations. In the background of the Sri Lankan landscape, a powerful biomass power plant looms, towering over the surroundings. Plumes of steam rise from the facility, illustrating its operation fueled by the imported plastic waste. The visual emphasizes the transformation of discarded plastic into energy through advanced recycling processes. The visual depiction captures the interconnectedness of global plastic consumption, waste management, and efforts to repurpose plastic waste for sustainable energy solutions.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in US Bottled Water Consumption per Person caused Biomass power generated in Sri Lanka to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Thirsty for Energy: Unbottling the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Biomass Power Generation in Sri Lanka

The Journal of Ecological Quenching

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Biomass power generated in Sri Lanka. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Statista and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9516067 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Thirsty for Energy: Unbottling the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Biomass Power Generation in Sri Lanka"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to quench the thirst for understanding the potential connection between US bottled water consumption per person and biomass power generated in Sri Lanka. Harnessing data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into the depths of statistical analysis to explore this peculiar relationship. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong positive correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9516067 and p < 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2021.

As we delved into the dataset, we couldn't help but ponder: is the US thirst for bottled water somehow powering the generation of biomass energy in the picturesque island of Sri Lanka? It seems that while one country is hydrating itself, another may be finding energy in an unexpected source. It's almost as if the US is saying, "I'm bottling up my hydration, but I'm also fueling Sri Lanka's power!"

Our findings may shed light on a quirky yet intriguing interaction between seemingly unrelated factors, prompting further investigation into the beverage-energy nexus. After all, who would have thought that something as seemingly innocuous as bottled water consumption could have a "bottle-neck" effect on biomass power generation in Sri Lanka?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Biomass power generated in Sri Lanka. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Thirsty for Energy: Unbottling the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Biomass Power Generation in Sri Lanka"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to quench the thirst for understanding the potential connection between US bottled water consumption per person and biomass power generated in Sri Lanka. Harnessing data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into the depths of statistical analysis to explore this peculiar relationship. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong positive correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9516067 and p < 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2021.

As we delved into the dataset, we couldn't help but ponder: is the US thirst for bottled water somehow powering the generation of biomass energy in the picturesque island of Sri Lanka? It seems that while one country is hydrating itself, another may be finding energy in an unexpected source. It's almost as if the US is saying, "I'm bottling up my hydration, but I'm also fueling Sri Lanka's power!"

Our findings may shed light on a quirky yet intriguing interaction between seemingly unrelated factors, prompting further investigation into the beverage-energy nexus. After all, who would have thought that something as seemingly innocuous as bottled water consumption could have a "bottle-neck" effect on biomass power generation in Sri Lanka?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Bottled water consumption in the United States has been on the rise for decades, with Americans guzzling through an average of 42 gallons per person annually. The industry is certainly not "bottling up" its success, as sales continue to surge. This trend raises the question: could the US's insatiable thirst for bottled water be more than just a quench for hydration, but an unwitting source of energy elsewhere?

In a tale of two liquids, our study explores whether the United States' love affair with bottled water may be having an unforeseen impact on the generation of biomass power in Sri Lanka. It's as if the US is whispering to Sri Lanka, "I've got the bottle, and you've got the biomass - let's make power together!"

As we dive into the data, it's clear that these two phenomena are indeed linked, sparking a curious case of transcontinental synergy. It's almost as if the US and Sri Lanka are engaged in a hydration-energy tango, with one fueling the other in an unexpected exchange. One could almost say that the US is "pouring" its resources into Sri Lanka's energy sector!

This investigation paves the way for a truly fascinating examination of the intersection of consumer behavior and global energy dynamics. It's a reminder that sometimes, the most unexpected connections can arise when we least expect them, much like finding a refreshing bottle of water in the middle of a desert.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Biomass power generated in Sri Lanka. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Thirsty for Energy: Unbottling the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Biomass Power Generation in Sri Lanka"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to quench the thirst for understanding the potential connection between US bottled water consumption per person and biomass power generated in Sri Lanka. Harnessing data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into the depths of statistical analysis to explore this peculiar relationship. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong positive correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9516067 and p < 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2021.

As we delved into the dataset, we couldn't help but ponder: is the US thirst for bottled water somehow powering the generation of biomass energy in the picturesque island of Sri Lanka? It seems that while one country is hydrating itself, another may be finding energy in an unexpected source. It's almost as if the US is saying, "I'm bottling up my hydration, but I'm also fueling Sri Lanka's power!"

Our findings may shed light on a quirky yet intriguing interaction between seemingly unrelated factors, prompting further investigation into the beverage-energy nexus. After all, who would have thought that something as seemingly innocuous as bottled water consumption could have a "bottle-neck" effect on biomass power generation in Sri Lanka?

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Bottled water consumption in the United States has been on the rise for decades, with Americans guzzling through an average of 42 gallons per person annually. The industry is certainly not "bottling up" its success, as sales continue to surge. This trend raises the question: could the US's insatiable thirst for bottled water be more than just a quench for hydration, but an unwitting source of energy elsewhere?
In a tale of two liquids, our study explores whether the United States' love affair with bottled water may be having an unforeseen impact on the generation of biomass power in Sri Lanka. It's as if the US is whispering to Sri Lanka, "I've got the bottle, and you've got the biomass - let's make power together!"
As we dive into the data, it's clear that these two phenomena are indeed linked, sparking a curious case of transcontinental synergy. It's almost as if the US and Sri Lanka are engaged in a hydration-energy tango, with one fueling the other in an unexpected exchange. One could almost say that the US is "pouring" its resources into Sri Lanka's energy sector!
This investigation paves the way for a truly fascinating examination of the intersection of consumer behavior and global energy dynamics. It's a reminder that sometimes, the most unexpected connections can arise when we least expect them, much like finding a refreshing bottle of water in the middle of a desert.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find a positive correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and biomass power generation in Sri Lanka. Based on an exhaustive analysis of statistical trends, the researchers propose that the surge in bottled water consumption in the US has an unintended but remarkable impact on the generation of biomass power in Sri Lanka.

Dad joke: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!

In "Doe's analysis," the authors note a peculiar relationship between the consumption of bottled water in the US and the generation of biomass power in Sri Lanka. The findings suggest a potential connection that defies conventional understanding, sparking intrigue among researchers and industry experts alike.

Dad joke: Did you hear about the mathematician who’s afraid of negative numbers? He’ll stop at nothing to avoid them!

In "Jones' report," the authors establish a significant association between US bottled water consumption and biomass power generated in Sri Lanka. This unexpected correlation prompts further exploration into the underlying mechanisms and potential implications for both the beverage and energy sectors.

Dad joke: I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug.

Our journey through the literature leads us to consider works such as "Bottled Up: The Nature of America's Thirst" and "Powering the Future: Biomass Energy Solutions." These texts provide valuable insights into the cultural and technological aspects of bottled water consumption and biomass power generation, offering a comprehensive backdrop for our investigation.

Turning a whimsical page, we come across "The Thirsty Princess and the Biomass Dragon" and "Bottled Water Adventures in Sri Lanka," fictional narratives that offer imaginative interpretations of the connection between bottled water consumption and biomass power generation.

Dad joke: Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts.

In a lighthearted exploration of childhood influences, our reflective gaze lands on classic cartoons such as "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" and "The Magic School Bus," where environmental themes and sustainable energy sources are playfully integrated into captivating storylines. While not directly related to our research, these beloved shows have undoubtedly shaped the way many of us perceive ecological dynamics and energy generation.

Dad joke: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!

The amalgamation of serious research, literary works, and childhood whimsy forms a unique backdrop as we delve into the intertwined realms of US bottled water consumption and biomass power generation in Sri Lanka.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Biomass power generated in Sri Lanka. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2005 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Thirsty for Energy: Unbottling the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Biomass Power Generation in Sri Lanka"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to quench the thirst for understanding the potential connection between US bottled water consumption per person and biomass power generated in Sri Lanka. Harnessing data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into the depths of statistical analysis to explore this peculiar relationship. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong positive correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9516067 and p < 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2021.

As we delved into the dataset, we couldn't help but ponder: is the US thirst for bottled water somehow powering the generation of biomass energy in the picturesque island of Sri Lanka? It seems that while one country is hydrating itself, another may be finding energy in an unexpected source. It's almost as if the US is saying, "I'm bottling up my hydration, but I'm also fueling Sri Lanka's power!"

Our findings may shed light on a quirky yet intriguing interaction between seemingly unrelated factors, prompting further investigation into the beverage-energy nexus. After all, who would have thought that something as seemingly innocuous as bottled water consumption could have a "bottle-neck" effect on biomass power generation in Sri Lanka?

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Bottled water consumption in the United States has been on the rise for decades, with Americans guzzling through an average of 42 gallons per person annually. The industry is certainly not "bottling up" its success, as sales continue to surge. This trend raises the question: could the US's insatiable thirst for bottled water be more than just a quench for hydration, but an unwitting source of energy elsewhere?
In a tale of two liquids, our study explores whether the United States' love affair with bottled water may be having an unforeseen impact on the generation of biomass power in Sri Lanka. It's as if the US is whispering to Sri Lanka, "I've got the bottle, and you've got the biomass - let's make power together!"
As we dive into the data, it's clear that these two phenomena are indeed linked, sparking a curious case of transcontinental synergy. It's almost as if the US and Sri Lanka are engaged in a hydration-energy tango, with one fueling the other in an unexpected exchange. One could almost say that the US is "pouring" its resources into Sri Lanka's energy sector!
This investigation paves the way for a truly fascinating examination of the intersection of consumer behavior and global energy dynamics. It's a reminder that sometimes, the most unexpected connections can arise when we least expect them, much like finding a refreshing bottle of water in the middle of a desert.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The methodology employed in this study involved gathering data from reputable sources such as Statista and the Energy Information Administration to investigate the relationship between US bottled water consumption per person and biomass power generation in Sri Lanka from 2005 to 2021. The research team navigated through the vast expanse of digital information much like a parched explorer in search of an oasis, albeit one made of data rather than water.

The first step involved wrangling the data from various sources and filtering out the anomalies and inconsistencies, akin to sieving through a murky pond to find the clearest, coolest water. Once the data were cleansed and standardized, the correlation between US bottled water consumption and biomass power generation in Sri Lanka was analyzed using statistical techniques.

The statistical models employed included Pearson correlation analysis and regression analysis. The correlation analysis sought to quantify the degree of linear relationship between the two variables, much like measuring the compatibility between a bottle and its cap. The regression analysis aimed to assess the predictive power of US bottled water consumption on biomass power generation in Sri Lanka, not unlike predicting the fountain of energy that may emanate from the seemingly innocuous flow of bottled water consumption.

The research team used multiple software packages, including but not limited to RStudio and SPSS, to carry out the statistical analyses. The assortment of tools at our disposal was reminiscent of a diligent chef selecting just the right utensils to prepare a complex yet delectable dish, albeit one with numbers instead of ingredients.

Upon conducting the statistical analyses, the results were scrutinized to ensure their validity and robustness. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the stability of the findings, akin to checking if a water bottle cap fits snugly on different bottles of the same brand.

After these rigorous procedures, the findings were ready to be unveiled, akin to finally quenching one's thirst after a long expedition. The results revealed a strong positive correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and biomass power generated in Sri Lanka, indicating a relationship that surpassed mere coincidence.

One could almost say that this research journey had its ups and downs, much like the fluctuations in water levels in a giant bottle. But in the end, the methodology employed helped illuminate the unexpected yet compelling connection between US bottled water consumption and biomass power generation in Sri Lanka, leaving us to ponder the curious ways in which global phenomena interact.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Biomass power generated in Sri Lanka. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Statista and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2005 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9516067, r-squared of 0.9055553, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Thirsty for Energy: Unbottling the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Biomass Power Generation in Sri Lanka"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to quench the thirst for understanding the potential connection between US bottled water consumption per person and biomass power generated in Sri Lanka. Harnessing data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into the depths of statistical analysis to explore this peculiar relationship. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong positive correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9516067 and p < 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2021.

As we delved into the dataset, we couldn't help but ponder: is the US thirst for bottled water somehow powering the generation of biomass energy in the picturesque island of Sri Lanka? It seems that while one country is hydrating itself, another may be finding energy in an unexpected source. It's almost as if the US is saying, "I'm bottling up my hydration, but I'm also fueling Sri Lanka's power!"

Our findings may shed light on a quirky yet intriguing interaction between seemingly unrelated factors, prompting further investigation into the beverage-energy nexus. After all, who would have thought that something as seemingly innocuous as bottled water consumption could have a "bottle-neck" effect on biomass power generation in Sri Lanka?

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Bottled water consumption in the United States has been on the rise for decades, with Americans guzzling through an average of 42 gallons per person annually. The industry is certainly not "bottling up" its success, as sales continue to surge. This trend raises the question: could the US's insatiable thirst for bottled water be more than just a quench for hydration, but an unwitting source of energy elsewhere?
In a tale of two liquids, our study explores whether the United States' love affair with bottled water may be having an unforeseen impact on the generation of biomass power in Sri Lanka. It's as if the US is whispering to Sri Lanka, "I've got the bottle, and you've got the biomass - let's make power together!"
As we dive into the data, it's clear that these two phenomena are indeed linked, sparking a curious case of transcontinental synergy. It's almost as if the US and Sri Lanka are engaged in a hydration-energy tango, with one fueling the other in an unexpected exchange. One could almost say that the US is "pouring" its resources into Sri Lanka's energy sector!
This investigation paves the way for a truly fascinating examination of the intersection of consumer behavior and global energy dynamics. It's a reminder that sometimes, the most unexpected connections can arise when we least expect them, much like finding a refreshing bottle of water in the middle of a desert.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Analysis of the data collected from 2005 to 2021 revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and biomass power generated in Sri Lanka, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9516067. This finding suggests that as US bottled water consumption increased, biomass power generation in Sri Lanka also experienced a corresponding rise. One might say that the US's penchant for bottled water is providing an unexpected "boost" to Sri Lanka's energy sector.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9055553 indicates that approximately 90.56% of the variability in biomass power generation in Sri Lanka can be explained by the variation in US bottled water consumption. It's almost as if the US is whispering to Sri Lanka, "I've got the hydration, and you've got the power - let's make energy together!"

The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, reinforcing the strength of the observed correlation. It seems that the relationship between US bottled water consumption and biomass power generated in Sri Lanka is no mere coincidence - there's a clear, statistically significant connection at play here.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) illustrates the strong positive relationship between US bottled water consumption per person and biomass power generated in Sri Lanka. The data points cluster closely around the upward trend line, depicting the synchronized ebb and flow of these seemingly disparate variables.

In conclusion, our research not only unveiled a robust correlation between US bottled water consumption and biomass power generation in Sri Lanka, but it also sparked a new perspective on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. It's as if the US is saying to Sri Lanka, "I may be bottled up, but I'm also revving up your power grid!" This unexpected linkage may serve as a catalyst for further investigations into the unexplored realms of beverage-energy dynamics. Who would have thought that a refreshing bottle of water could hold the key to unlocking new dimensions of global energy interplay?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Biomass power generated in Sri Lanka. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Thirsty for Energy: Unbottling the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Biomass Power Generation in Sri Lanka"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to quench the thirst for understanding the potential connection between US bottled water consumption per person and biomass power generated in Sri Lanka. Harnessing data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into the depths of statistical analysis to explore this peculiar relationship. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong positive correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9516067 and p < 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2021.

As we delved into the dataset, we couldn't help but ponder: is the US thirst for bottled water somehow powering the generation of biomass energy in the picturesque island of Sri Lanka? It seems that while one country is hydrating itself, another may be finding energy in an unexpected source. It's almost as if the US is saying, "I'm bottling up my hydration, but I'm also fueling Sri Lanka's power!"

Our findings may shed light on a quirky yet intriguing interaction between seemingly unrelated factors, prompting further investigation into the beverage-energy nexus. After all, who would have thought that something as seemingly innocuous as bottled water consumption could have a "bottle-neck" effect on biomass power generation in Sri Lanka?

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find a positive correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and biomass power generation in Sri Lanka. Based on an exhaustive analysis of statistical trends, the researchers propose that the surge in bottled water consumption in the US has an unintended but remarkable impact on the generation of biomass power in Sri Lanka.
Dad joke: Why don't scientists trust atoms? Because they make up everything!
In "Doe's analysis," the authors note a peculiar relationship between the consumption of bottled water in the US and the generation of biomass power in Sri Lanka. The findings suggest a potential connection that defies conventional understanding, sparking intrigue among researchers and industry experts alike.
Dad joke: Did you hear about the mathematician who’s afraid of negative numbers? He’ll stop at nothing to avoid them!
In "Jones' report," the authors establish a significant association between US bottled water consumption and biomass power generated in Sri Lanka. This unexpected correlation prompts further exploration into the underlying mechanisms and potential implications for both the beverage and energy sectors.
Dad joke: I told my wife she should embrace her mistakes. She gave me a hug.
Our journey through the literature leads us to consider works such as "Bottled Up: The Nature of America's Thirst" and "Powering the Future: Biomass Energy Solutions." These texts provide valuable insights into the cultural and technological aspects of bottled water consumption and biomass power generation, offering a comprehensive backdrop for our investigation.
Turning a whimsical page, we come across "The Thirsty Princess and the Biomass Dragon" and "Bottled Water Adventures in Sri Lanka," fictional narratives that offer imaginative interpretations of the connection between bottled water consumption and biomass power generation.
Dad joke: Why don't skeletons fight each other? They don't have the guts.
In a lighthearted exploration of childhood influences, our reflective gaze lands on classic cartoons such as "Captain Planet and the Planeteers" and "The Magic School Bus," where environmental themes and sustainable energy sources are playfully integrated into captivating storylines. While not directly related to our research, these beloved shows have undoubtedly shaped the way many of us perceive ecological dynamics and energy generation.
Dad joke: Why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!
The amalgamation of serious research, literary works, and childhood whimsy forms a unique backdrop as we delve into the intertwined realms of US bottled water consumption and biomass power generation in Sri Lanka.

[[RESULTS]]
Analysis of the data collected from 2005 to 2021 revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and biomass power generated in Sri Lanka, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9516067. This finding suggests that as US bottled water consumption increased, biomass power generation in Sri Lanka also experienced a corresponding rise. One might say that the US's penchant for bottled water is providing an unexpected "boost" to Sri Lanka's energy sector.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9055553 indicates that approximately 90.56% of the variability in biomass power generation in Sri Lanka can be explained by the variation in US bottled water consumption. It's almost as if the US is whispering to Sri Lanka, "I've got the hydration, and you've got the power - let's make energy together!"
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, reinforcing the strength of the observed correlation. It seems that the relationship between US bottled water consumption and biomass power generated in Sri Lanka is no mere coincidence - there's a clear, statistically significant connection at play here.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) illustrates the strong positive relationship between US bottled water consumption per person and biomass power generated in Sri Lanka. The data points cluster closely around the upward trend line, depicting the synchronized ebb and flow of these seemingly disparate variables.
In conclusion, our research not only unveiled a robust correlation between US bottled water consumption and biomass power generation in Sri Lanka, but it also sparked a new perspective on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. It's as if the US is saying to Sri Lanka, "I may be bottled up, but I'm also revving up your power grid!" This unexpected linkage may serve as a catalyst for further investigations into the unexplored realms of beverage-energy dynamics. Who would have thought that a refreshing bottle of water could hold the key to unlocking new dimensions of global energy interplay?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation into the relationship between US bottled water consumption per person and biomass power generation in Sri Lanka has yielded intriguing results that align with prior research. The strong positive correlation we observed supports the findings of previous studies, affirming the unexpected yet substantial link between these seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that the US's thirst for bottled water is echoing across the oceans to fuel biomass power in Sri Lanka, creating a hydrologic "current" that powers sustainable energy generation.

The positive correlation coefficient of 0.9516067 aligns closely with the previous research conducted by Smith et al. and Doe's analysis, indicating a consistent pattern in the dynamics between US bottled water consumption and biomass power generation in Sri Lanka. This alignment reinforces the robustness of the observed relationship, offering further validation to the quirky yet compelling hypothesis that these two factors are indeed interconnected. It's as if the US's love for bottled water is sending a "wave" of energy across the globe!

The strong correlation coefficient also emphasizes the substantial impact of US bottled water consumption on biomass power generated in Sri Lanka, highlighting the intricate interplay between a consumer behavior in one country and energy outcomes in another. It's almost as if the US is symbolically saying to Sri Lanka, "I've got your back - or should I say, your bottle?"

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9055553 indicates that a significant proportion of the variance in biomass power generation in Sri Lanka can be attributed to the variation in US bottled water consumption. This alignment with previous research underscores the reproducibility of the relationship, emphasizing the robustness of this peculiar connection. One might say that the correlation is as solid as an "aquifer"!

The significant p-value further reinforces the strength of the observed correlation, echoing the sentiment expressed by Jones' report that the association between US bottled water consumption and biomass power in Sri Lanka is indeed meaningful and not merely a statistical coincidence. It's as if the relationship is shouting, "Hydrate with purpose and power the world!"

In summary, our findings not only support the prior research on the relationship between US bottled water consumption and biomass power generated in Sri Lanka but also add a refreshing perspective on the intricate global dynamics between consumer habits and sustainable energy generation. The unexpected interconnectedness of these variables invites further exploration and may serve as a source of inspiration for future studies delving into the uncharted waters of beverage-energy interactions. After all, who would have thought that a simple bottle of water could have such a far-reaching impact on the world's energy landscape?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between US Bottled Water Consumption per Person and Biomass power generated in Sri Lanka. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Thirsty for Energy: Unbottling the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Biomass Power Generation in Sri Lanka"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study aimed to quench the thirst for understanding the potential connection between US bottled water consumption per person and biomass power generated in Sri Lanka. Harnessing data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into the depths of statistical analysis to explore this peculiar relationship. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong positive correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9516067 and p < 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2021.

As we delved into the dataset, we couldn't help but ponder: is the US thirst for bottled water somehow powering the generation of biomass energy in the picturesque island of Sri Lanka? It seems that while one country is hydrating itself, another may be finding energy in an unexpected source. It's almost as if the US is saying, "I'm bottling up my hydration, but I'm also fueling Sri Lanka's power!"

Our findings may shed light on a quirky yet intriguing interaction between seemingly unrelated factors, prompting further investigation into the beverage-energy nexus. After all, who would have thought that something as seemingly innocuous as bottled water consumption could have a "bottle-neck" effect on biomass power generation in Sri Lanka?

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Bottled water consumption in the United States has been on the rise for decades, with Americans guzzling through an average of 42 gallons per person annually. The industry is certainly not "bottling up" its success, as sales continue to surge. This trend raises the question: could the US's insatiable thirst for bottled water be more than just a quench for hydration, but an unwitting source of energy elsewhere?
In a tale of two liquids, our study explores whether the United States' love affair with bottled water may be having an unforeseen impact on the generation of biomass power in Sri Lanka. It's as if the US is whispering to Sri Lanka, "I've got the bottle, and you've got the biomass - let's make power together!"
As we dive into the data, it's clear that these two phenomena are indeed linked, sparking a curious case of transcontinental synergy. It's almost as if the US and Sri Lanka are engaged in a hydration-energy tango, with one fueling the other in an unexpected exchange. One could almost say that the US is "pouring" its resources into Sri Lanka's energy sector!
This investigation paves the way for a truly fascinating examination of the intersection of consumer behavior and global energy dynamics. It's a reminder that sometimes, the most unexpected connections can arise when we least expect them, much like finding a refreshing bottle of water in the middle of a desert.

[[RESULTS]]
Analysis of the data collected from 2005 to 2021 revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation between US bottled water consumption per person and biomass power generated in Sri Lanka, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9516067. This finding suggests that as US bottled water consumption increased, biomass power generation in Sri Lanka also experienced a corresponding rise. One might say that the US's penchant for bottled water is providing an unexpected "boost" to Sri Lanka's energy sector.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9055553 indicates that approximately 90.56% of the variability in biomass power generation in Sri Lanka can be explained by the variation in US bottled water consumption. It's almost as if the US is whispering to Sri Lanka, "I've got the hydration, and you've got the power - let's make energy together!"
The p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis, reinforcing the strength of the observed correlation. It seems that the relationship between US bottled water consumption and biomass power generated in Sri Lanka is no mere coincidence - there's a clear, statistically significant connection at play here.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) illustrates the strong positive relationship between US bottled water consumption per person and biomass power generated in Sri Lanka. The data points cluster closely around the upward trend line, depicting the synchronized ebb and flow of these seemingly disparate variables.
In conclusion, our research not only unveiled a robust correlation between US bottled water consumption and biomass power generation in Sri Lanka, but it also sparked a new perspective on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena. It's as if the US is saying to Sri Lanka, "I may be bottled up, but I'm also revving up your power grid!" This unexpected linkage may serve as a catalyst for further investigations into the unexplored realms of beverage-energy dynamics. Who would have thought that a refreshing bottle of water could hold the key to unlocking new dimensions of global energy interplay?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has poured light on the unexpected connection between US bottled water consumption and biomass power generation in Sri Lanka. It seems that as Americans sip on their bottled hydration, they are inadvertently fueling the generation of energy in a far-off island. One might say the US is acting as a kind of "hydro-power" enthusiast for Sri Lanka, without even realizing it!

Our findings suggest that the US's affinity for bottled water is not just about staying hydrated - it's also providing a "spring" of energy for Sri Lanka. This correlation highlights the fascinating interplay between seemingly unrelated factors, akin to stumbling upon a refreshing oasis in the middle of a statistical desert.

One can't help but wonder: is the US's bottled water habit a "fountain" of energy for Sri Lanka? These results certainly suggest so; it's as if the US is saying, "I'm bottling up my refreshing drinks, but I'm also bottling up your energy potential!"

Overall, our study uncovers a dynamic and quirky relationship between US bottled water consumption and biomass power generation in Sri Lanka. It's almost as if the US is unwittingly participating in a transcontinental beverage-energy pas de deux. As we close this chapter, it seems clear that further research in this area may be unnecessary. Our results speak for themselves, leaving little "bottle" room for doubt.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Thirsty for Energy: Unbottling the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Biomass Power Generation in Sri Lanka. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Ecological Quenching


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Thirsty for Energy: Unbottling the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Biomass Power Generation in Sri Lanka. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Global Water and Energy Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Thirsty for Energy: Unbottling the Relationship Between US Bottled Water Consumption and Biomass Power Generation in Sri Lanka with an abstract of This study aimed to quench the thirst for understanding the potential connection between US bottled water consumption per person and biomass power generated in Sri Lanka. Harnessing data from Statista and the Energy Information Administration, our research team delved into the depths of statistical analysis to explore this peculiar relationship. Surprisingly, our findings revealed a strong positive correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9516067 and p < 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2021.
As we delved into the dataset, we couldn't help but ponder: is the US thirst for bottled water somehow powering the generation of biomass energy in the picturesque island of Sri Lanka? It seems that while one country is hydrating itself, another may be finding energy in an unexpected source. It's almost as if the US is saying, "I'm bottling up my hydration, but I'm also fueling Sri Lanka's power!"
Our findings may shed light on a quirky yet intriguing interaction between seemingly unrelated factors, prompting further investigation into the beverage-energy nexus. After all, who would have thought that something as seemingly innocuous as bottled water consumption could have a "bottle-neck" effect on biomass power generation in Sri Lanka?

ChatGPT:

bottled water consumption, biomass power generation, US, Sri Lanka, correlation, statistical analysis, energy consumption, beverage industry, environmental impact, sustainability, beverage consumption, renewable energy

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

US Bottled Water Consumption per Person
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with US Bottled Water Consumption per Person

Biomass power generated in Sri Lanka
Detailed data title: Total biomass power generated in Sri Lanka in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Biomass power generated in Sri Lanka

Correlation r = 0.9516067 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9055553 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 90.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Biomass power generated in Sri Lanka) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., US Bottled Water Consumption per Person) over the 17 years from 2005 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.4E-9. 0.0000000043591808628778090000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 4.4E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 229,400,897 random variables You don't actually need 229 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 16 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 16 because we have two variables measured over a period of 17 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.87, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
US Bottled Water Consumption per Person (Gallons)25.427.62928.527.628.329.230.83234.136.5394242.34445.247
Biomass power generated in Sri Lanka (Billion kWh)0.0020.0020.0010.0080.0230.0330.0320.0220.0260.0410.0570.0720.0670.0870.1180.0980.098781




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([25.4,27.6,29,28.5,27.6,28.3,29.2,30.8,32,34.1,36.5,39,42,42.3,44,45.2,47,])
array_2 = np.array([0.002,0.002,0.001,0.008,0.023,0.033,0.032,0.022,0.026,0.041,0.057,0.072,0.067,0.087,0.118,0.098,0.098781,])
array_1_name = "US Bottled Water Consumption per Person"
array_2_name = "Biomass power generated in Sri Lanka"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 3124 · Black Variable ID: 32 · Red Variable ID: 23998
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0