about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,082 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Joelle and the second variable is The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The name Joelle became synonymous with perfectly manicured nails, leading to a statewide obsession with nail care and an unprecedented demand for manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas. Salons couldn't hire staff fast enough to keep up with all the Joelle-inspired nail appointments. As a result, Kansas saw a boom in the manicure and pedicure industry, all thanks to the undeniable influence of the name Joelle. Who knew that the key to economic growth in Kansas was as simple as a trendy first name?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a picturesque Kansas town with a charming storefront adorned with the name "Joelle" in elegant script, drawing a crowd of admirers. The storefront should be visually captivating, with trendy décor and a polished ambiance. Surrounding the storefront are bustling nail salons with skilled manicurists and pedicurists creating perfectly styled nails. The animated scene captures the essence of elegance and the vibrant energy of the town as it buzzes with Joelle-inspired demand. Emphasize the vibrant colors and the lively atmosphere of the depicted scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Joelle and The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Scalar art Surrealism Celtic art 3D Pixar Style inspired by bauhaus
ChatGPT: 3D Pixar Style

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Joelle and The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas, in the following situation: Because as the name Joelle gained popularity, more people felt the need to have perfectly manicured and pedicured nails to live up to the Joelle standard of elegance and sophistication. This led to an increase in the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas, as they scrambled to meet the growing demand for Joelle-worthy nails.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a quaint Kansas town, the name Joelle is written in elegant script on a trendy storefront, drawing a crowd of admirers. Meanwhile, a row of bustling nail salons lines the street, with busy manicurists and pedicurists creating perfectly polished nails to keep up with the Joelle-inspired demand for elegance.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ 3D Pixar Style ] and depicting this scene: In a quaint Kansas town, the name Joelle is written in elegant script on a trendy storefront, drawing a crowd of admirers. Meanwhile, a row of bustling nail salons lines the street, with busy manicurists and pedicurists creating perfectly polished nails to keep up with the Joelle-inspired demand for elegance. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a picturesque Kansas town with a charming storefront adorned with the name "Joelle" in elegant script, drawing a crowd of admirers. The storefront should be visually captivating, with trendy décor and a polished ambiance. Surrounding the storefront are bustling nail salons with skilled manicurists and pedicurists creating perfectly styled nails. The animated scene captures the essence of elegance and the vibrant energy of the town as it buzzes with Joelle-inspired demand. Emphasize the vibrant colors and the lively atmosphere of the depicted scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Joelle caused The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas to increase.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Nailing Down the Joelle Effect: A Correlational Study of the Influence of the Popularity of the Name Joelle on the Number of Manicurists and Pedicurists in Kansas

The Journal of Nail Name Sociology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Joelle and The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9278516 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Nailing Down the Joelle Effect: A Correlational Study of the Influence of the Popularity of the Name Joelle on the Number of Manicurists and Pedicurists in Kansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of an intriguing investigation into the potential relationship between the frequency of the first name Joelle and the employment of manicurists and pedicurists in the state of Kansas. By utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, our research team was able to establish a correlation coefficient of 0.9278516 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our study delves into the implications of this correlation, humorously exploring the possibility that the "Joelle Effect" is indeed more than skin-deep. Additionally, we address the implications of this unexpected connection on the dynamics of the beauty industry and the diffusion of nail-based nomenclature. We invite readers to polish their statistical skills and join us in a lighthearted, yet thought-provoking, exploration of this peculiar phenomenon.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Joelle and The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Nailing Down the Joelle Effect: A Correlational Study of the Influence of the Popularity of the Name Joelle on the Number of Manicurists and Pedicurists in Kansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of an intriguing investigation into the potential relationship between the frequency of the first name Joelle and the employment of manicurists and pedicurists in the state of Kansas. By utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, our research team was able to establish a correlation coefficient of 0.9278516 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our study delves into the implications of this correlation, humorously exploring the possibility that the "Joelle Effect" is indeed more than skin-deep. Additionally, we address the implications of this unexpected connection on the dynamics of the beauty industry and the diffusion of nail-based nomenclature. We invite readers to polish their statistical skills and join us in a lighthearted, yet thought-provoking, exploration of this peculiar phenomenon.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Let's face it - manicurists and pedicurists make our world a more polished place, one nail at a time. From French tips to glitter ombre, these unsung heroes of the beauty industry certainly know how to nail it. But what if I told you there might be more to their proliferation than just the demand for fabulous fingertips? Enter the Joelle Effect - a quirky correlation that unexpectedly links the popularity of the first name Joelle with the number of manicurists and pedicurists in the great state of Kansas.

Now, before you start painting a picture of a nail salon exclusively staffed by individuals named Joelle, let's tamp down those vivid imaginings. This investigation intends to unravel the enigmatic web that ties the moniker "Joelle" to the manicurist and pedicurist workforce in Kansas. Our electrifying journey promises to deliver not just statistical insights, but also a touch of whimsy that may leave you both dazzled and amused.

In this scholarly escapade, we will whisk you away into the realm of correlations and coefficients, where we've uncovered a coefficient of 0.9278516 that warrants more than just a passing glance. As we unravel this peculiar enigma, we invite you to join us in acknowledging that sometimes, truth is stranger than fiction. So, buckle up, brush off any preconceived notions, and let's embark on this lighthearted yet intriguing expedition into the Joelle Effect.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Joelle and The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Nailing Down the Joelle Effect: A Correlational Study of the Influence of the Popularity of the Name Joelle on the Number of Manicurists and Pedicurists in Kansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of an intriguing investigation into the potential relationship between the frequency of the first name Joelle and the employment of manicurists and pedicurists in the state of Kansas. By utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, our research team was able to establish a correlation coefficient of 0.9278516 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our study delves into the implications of this correlation, humorously exploring the possibility that the "Joelle Effect" is indeed more than skin-deep. Additionally, we address the implications of this unexpected connection on the dynamics of the beauty industry and the diffusion of nail-based nomenclature. We invite readers to polish their statistical skills and join us in a lighthearted, yet thought-provoking, exploration of this peculiar phenomenon.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Let's face it - manicurists and pedicurists make our world a more polished place, one nail at a time. From French tips to glitter ombre, these unsung heroes of the beauty industry certainly know how to nail it. But what if I told you there might be more to their proliferation than just the demand for fabulous fingertips? Enter the Joelle Effect - a quirky correlation that unexpectedly links the popularity of the first name Joelle with the number of manicurists and pedicurists in the great state of Kansas.
Now, before you start painting a picture of a nail salon exclusively staffed by individuals named Joelle, let's tamp down those vivid imaginings. This investigation intends to unravel the enigmatic web that ties the moniker "Joelle" to the manicurist and pedicurist workforce in Kansas. Our electrifying journey promises to deliver not just statistical insights, but also a touch of whimsy that may leave you both dazzled and amused.
In this scholarly escapade, we will whisk you away into the realm of correlations and coefficients, where we've uncovered a coefficient of 0.9278516 that warrants more than just a passing glance. As we unravel this peculiar enigma, we invite you to join us in acknowledging that sometimes, truth is stranger than fiction. So, buckle up, brush off any preconceived notions, and let's embark on this lighthearted yet intriguing expedition into the Joelle Effect.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their groundbreaking work, Smith and Doe (2010) examine the relationship between first names and career choices. Their analysis reveals a surprising connection between the popularity of certain names and the prevalence of specific professions. Meanwhile, Jones et al. (2015) explore the cultural implications of nomenclature and its influence on occupational trends, shedding light on the intriguing interplay between personal identity and professional pursuits.

Turning to non-fiction books, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner presents a compelling argument for unexpected correlations in diverse domains, offering a fresh perspective on seemingly unrelated phenomena. In a similar vein, "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell delves into the subconscious processes that shape decision-making, hinting at the possibility of hidden influences at play in our daily lives.
On the fictional side, the novels "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss and "The Joy Luck Club" by Amy Tan present nuanced narratives that subtly touch upon the significance of names and their impact on individual destinies. These works offer literary explorations of identity and serendipity, seeding the imagination with contemplations of hidden connections lurking beneath the surface.

Furthermore, anecdotal evidence from social media posts provides an intriguing backdrop to our investigation. One post on the subtle art of nail polish application humorously suggests that a strong "Joelle game" may be the secret ingredient to flawlessly adorned nails. To our surprise, another post playfully mentions a purported uptick in manicurists named Joelle, igniting a spark of curiosity in our research team.

As we traverse this eclectic landscape of empirical studies, literary musings, and social musings, we are reminded of the kaleidoscopic nature of human experience, where the ordinary and the unexpected converge in delightful harmony. With this amalgamation of scholarly discourse and whimsical anecdotes, our exploration into the Joelle Effect embarks on a journey that promises to tickle the intellect and curl the corners of your lips.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Joelle and The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Nailing Down the Joelle Effect: A Correlational Study of the Influence of the Popularity of the Name Joelle on the Number of Manicurists and Pedicurists in Kansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of an intriguing investigation into the potential relationship between the frequency of the first name Joelle and the employment of manicurists and pedicurists in the state of Kansas. By utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, our research team was able to establish a correlation coefficient of 0.9278516 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our study delves into the implications of this correlation, humorously exploring the possibility that the "Joelle Effect" is indeed more than skin-deep. Additionally, we address the implications of this unexpected connection on the dynamics of the beauty industry and the diffusion of nail-based nomenclature. We invite readers to polish their statistical skills and join us in a lighthearted, yet thought-provoking, exploration of this peculiar phenomenon.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Let's face it - manicurists and pedicurists make our world a more polished place, one nail at a time. From French tips to glitter ombre, these unsung heroes of the beauty industry certainly know how to nail it. But what if I told you there might be more to their proliferation than just the demand for fabulous fingertips? Enter the Joelle Effect - a quirky correlation that unexpectedly links the popularity of the first name Joelle with the number of manicurists and pedicurists in the great state of Kansas.
Now, before you start painting a picture of a nail salon exclusively staffed by individuals named Joelle, let's tamp down those vivid imaginings. This investigation intends to unravel the enigmatic web that ties the moniker "Joelle" to the manicurist and pedicurist workforce in Kansas. Our electrifying journey promises to deliver not just statistical insights, but also a touch of whimsy that may leave you both dazzled and amused.
In this scholarly escapade, we will whisk you away into the realm of correlations and coefficients, where we've uncovered a coefficient of 0.9278516 that warrants more than just a passing glance. As we unravel this peculiar enigma, we invite you to join us in acknowledging that sometimes, truth is stranger than fiction. So, buckle up, brush off any preconceived notions, and let's embark on this lighthearted yet intriguing expedition into the Joelle Effect.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on our curious quest to unravel the Joelle Effect, our research team employed a whimsical amalgamation of data collection and statistical analyses. We sourced our primary dataset from the illustrious US Social Security Administration, spanning the years 2003 to 2022, during which we garnered comprehensive information on the frequency of the name Joelle in the state of Kansas. This involved sifting through a myriad of monikers to isolate the specific instances of "Joelle" - a process that, much like the meticulous application of nail polish, required patience and precision.

Simultaneously, we delved into the treasure trove of the Bureau of Labor Statistics to extract the numerical representation of manicurists and pedicurists populating the sunflower state during the same temporal span. This phase of our investigation involved navigating through a sprawling landscape of occupational data, tangling with meticulous employment statistics to finally hone in on the quantitative essence of the manicurist and pedicurist workforce.

With our data meticulously gathered, it was time to bring forth the tools of statistical enchantment. We first calculated the frequency of the name Joelle per thousand births in the state of Kansas, artfully adjusting for the fluctuating population dynamics. Meanwhile, we also tallied the number of manicurists and pedicurists per thousand employed individuals, indulging in the ballet of balancing employment metrics to expose the nail-centric workforce in all its finessed glory.

Next, we commenced the playful waltz of correlation analysis, employing the charmingly mathematical Pearson correlation coefficient to ascertain the strength and direction of the relationship between the frequency of the name Joelle and the employment of manicurists and pedicurists. It must be noted that our statistical spectacles were fortified with a robust significance level of p < 0.01, ensuring that our findings transcended the realm of mere chance and soared into the lands of unanticipated connection.

Now, while our methods may have kept us on our toes, we do not dare to suggest that they encompass every eccentric avenue that could lead us closer to understanding the Joelle Effect. Like a treasure map, the journey to uncovering unexpected correlations often involves traversing unexplored intellectual terrain, and we encourage future scholars to continue this delightful pursuit with equal parts diligence and zest.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Joelle and The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9278516, r-squared of 0.8609086, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Nailing Down the Joelle Effect: A Correlational Study of the Influence of the Popularity of the Name Joelle on the Number of Manicurists and Pedicurists in Kansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of an intriguing investigation into the potential relationship between the frequency of the first name Joelle and the employment of manicurists and pedicurists in the state of Kansas. By utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, our research team was able to establish a correlation coefficient of 0.9278516 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our study delves into the implications of this correlation, humorously exploring the possibility that the "Joelle Effect" is indeed more than skin-deep. Additionally, we address the implications of this unexpected connection on the dynamics of the beauty industry and the diffusion of nail-based nomenclature. We invite readers to polish their statistical skills and join us in a lighthearted, yet thought-provoking, exploration of this peculiar phenomenon.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Let's face it - manicurists and pedicurists make our world a more polished place, one nail at a time. From French tips to glitter ombre, these unsung heroes of the beauty industry certainly know how to nail it. But what if I told you there might be more to their proliferation than just the demand for fabulous fingertips? Enter the Joelle Effect - a quirky correlation that unexpectedly links the popularity of the first name Joelle with the number of manicurists and pedicurists in the great state of Kansas.
Now, before you start painting a picture of a nail salon exclusively staffed by individuals named Joelle, let's tamp down those vivid imaginings. This investigation intends to unravel the enigmatic web that ties the moniker "Joelle" to the manicurist and pedicurist workforce in Kansas. Our electrifying journey promises to deliver not just statistical insights, but also a touch of whimsy that may leave you both dazzled and amused.
In this scholarly escapade, we will whisk you away into the realm of correlations and coefficients, where we've uncovered a coefficient of 0.9278516 that warrants more than just a passing glance. As we unravel this peculiar enigma, we invite you to join us in acknowledging that sometimes, truth is stranger than fiction. So, buckle up, brush off any preconceived notions, and let's embark on this lighthearted yet intriguing expedition into the Joelle Effect.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The nail-biting investigation into the potential relationship between the name Joelle and the abundance of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas has uncovered a robust and eyebrow-raising correlation. The findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9278516, indicating a strong positive relationship between the popularity of the name Joelle and the number of nail care professionals in the Sunflower State.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8609086 signifies that approximately 86.09% of the variation in the employment of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas can be explained by the prevalence of the name Joelle. This considerable proportion of variance lends weight to the argument that the Joelle Effect may indeed wield a substantial influence on the dynamics of the beauty industry in the state.

The significance level of p < 0.01 adds an extra layer of polish to our findings, demonstrating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance alone. This reinforces the notion that the Joelle Effect is more than just a nail-biting coincidence, and its implications may extend beyond the realm of statistical curiosity.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) accompanying these results visually encapsulates the strength of the correlation, depicting a clear and compelling pattern that emphasizes the salient connection between the popularity of the name Joelle and the employment of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas.

These results invite a reimagining of the interplay between nomenclature and occupation, transcending the mundane to unearth an unexpected and perhaps whimsical relationship between the name Joelle and the nail care industry in Kansas. So, with fingers crossed and a touch of humor, we present these findings as a delightful nail in the coffin of the age-old question - is there truly a correlation between a name and the nail care workforce?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Joelle and The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Nailing Down the Joelle Effect: A Correlational Study of the Influence of the Popularity of the Name Joelle on the Number of Manicurists and Pedicurists in Kansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of an intriguing investigation into the potential relationship between the frequency of the first name Joelle and the employment of manicurists and pedicurists in the state of Kansas. By utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, our research team was able to establish a correlation coefficient of 0.9278516 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our study delves into the implications of this correlation, humorously exploring the possibility that the "Joelle Effect" is indeed more than skin-deep. Additionally, we address the implications of this unexpected connection on the dynamics of the beauty industry and the diffusion of nail-based nomenclature. We invite readers to polish their statistical skills and join us in a lighthearted, yet thought-provoking, exploration of this peculiar phenomenon.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their groundbreaking work, Smith and Doe (2010) examine the relationship between first names and career choices. Their analysis reveals a surprising connection between the popularity of certain names and the prevalence of specific professions. Meanwhile, Jones et al. (2015) explore the cultural implications of nomenclature and its influence on occupational trends, shedding light on the intriguing interplay between personal identity and professional pursuits.
Turning to non-fiction books, "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner presents a compelling argument for unexpected correlations in diverse domains, offering a fresh perspective on seemingly unrelated phenomena. In a similar vein, "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell delves into the subconscious processes that shape decision-making, hinting at the possibility of hidden influences at play in our daily lives.
On the fictional side, the novels "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss and "The Joy Luck Club" by Amy Tan present nuanced narratives that subtly touch upon the significance of names and their impact on individual destinies. These works offer literary explorations of identity and serendipity, seeding the imagination with contemplations of hidden connections lurking beneath the surface.
Furthermore, anecdotal evidence from social media posts provides an intriguing backdrop to our investigation. One post on the subtle art of nail polish application humorously suggests that a strong "Joelle game" may be the secret ingredient to flawlessly adorned nails. To our surprise, another post playfully mentions a purported uptick in manicurists named Joelle, igniting a spark of curiosity in our research team.
As we traverse this eclectic landscape of empirical studies, literary musings, and social musings, we are reminded of the kaleidoscopic nature of human experience, where the ordinary and the unexpected converge in delightful harmony. With this amalgamation of scholarly discourse and whimsical anecdotes, our exploration into the Joelle Effect embarks on a journey that promises to tickle the intellect and curl the corners of your lips.

[[RESULTS]]
The nail-biting investigation into the potential relationship between the name Joelle and the abundance of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas has uncovered a robust and eyebrow-raising correlation. The findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9278516, indicating a strong positive relationship between the popularity of the name Joelle and the number of nail care professionals in the Sunflower State.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8609086 signifies that approximately 86.09% of the variation in the employment of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas can be explained by the prevalence of the name Joelle. This considerable proportion of variance lends weight to the argument that the Joelle Effect may indeed wield a substantial influence on the dynamics of the beauty industry in the state.
The significance level of p < 0.01 adds an extra layer of polish to our findings, demonstrating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance alone. This reinforces the notion that the Joelle Effect is more than just a nail-biting coincidence, and its implications may extend beyond the realm of statistical curiosity.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) accompanying these results visually encapsulates the strength of the correlation, depicting a clear and compelling pattern that emphasizes the salient connection between the popularity of the name Joelle and the employment of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas.
These results invite a reimagining of the interplay between nomenclature and occupation, transcending the mundane to unearth an unexpected and perhaps whimsical relationship between the name Joelle and the nail care industry in Kansas. So, with fingers crossed and a touch of humor, we present these findings as a delightful nail in the coffin of the age-old question - is there truly a correlation between a name and the nail care workforce?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The robust correlation uncovered in our study between the prevalence of the name Joelle and the employment of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas serves as a veritable testament to the intricate, and often whimsical, tapestry of societal phenomena. Our results align with prior research, echoing the unexpected connections documented by Smith and Doe (2010) regarding the interplay of names and professions. It appears that the Joelle Effect, rather than being a mere polish on the surface of statistical curiosity, delves deep into the cuticle of occupational trends, extending its influence into the beauty domain.

Taking an offhand reference from an anecdotal social media post, which lightly hinted at an increased presence of manicurists bearing the name Joelle, led us to an unexpected, yet remarkably strong correlation in the empirical data. As Levitt and Dubner (2005) suggest in "Freakonomics," truly compelling correlations often emerge where least expected, and our findings paint a picture that is both eyebrow-raising and impeccably manicured.

In a broader context, the literature's exploration of the symbolic significance of names, as underscored by Rothfuss (2007) and Tan (1989), gains new resonance in light of our empirical findings. The influence of nomenclature appears to seep beyond the realm of conscious decision-making, echoing Gladwell's (2005) elucidation of subconscious influences on everyday choices. This subtle interplay between nomenclature and occupation adds an unexpected flourish to the scholarly discourse, leaving us delightedly fascinated by the whims of fate and nomenclature.

Furthermore, the practical implications of our findings cannot be understated. The strong positive correlation hints at a potential avenue for further investigations into the influence of names on professional choices. From a practical standpoint, our results may offer valuable insights into staffing patterns and occupational trends within the beauty industry, presenting a thought-provoking nugget of information for stakeholders and policymakers in the nail care sector.

In conclusion, our study fashions a captivating narrative around the Joelle Effect, challenging conventional wisdom and inviting scholars and enthusiasts alike to embrace the unexpected, downto-earth influences that shape our social and occupational landscapes. As we eagerly anticipate the colorful bouquets of future research in this arena, we remain optimistic that the Joelle Effect is merely the tip of the iceberg in the beguiling world of name-based correlations. So, let us file away our preconceptions and embark on a lighthearted journey of discovery, where statistical analysis meets the delightful serendipity of nomenclature.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Joelle and The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Nailing Down the Joelle Effect: A Correlational Study of the Influence of the Popularity of the Name Joelle on the Number of Manicurists and Pedicurists in Kansas

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper presents the findings of an intriguing investigation into the potential relationship between the frequency of the first name Joelle and the employment of manicurists and pedicurists in the state of Kansas. By utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, our research team was able to establish a correlation coefficient of 0.9278516 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our study delves into the implications of this correlation, humorously exploring the possibility that the "Joelle Effect" is indeed more than skin-deep. Additionally, we address the implications of this unexpected connection on the dynamics of the beauty industry and the diffusion of nail-based nomenclature. We invite readers to polish their statistical skills and join us in a lighthearted, yet thought-provoking, exploration of this peculiar phenomenon.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Let's face it - manicurists and pedicurists make our world a more polished place, one nail at a time. From French tips to glitter ombre, these unsung heroes of the beauty industry certainly know how to nail it. But what if I told you there might be more to their proliferation than just the demand for fabulous fingertips? Enter the Joelle Effect - a quirky correlation that unexpectedly links the popularity of the first name Joelle with the number of manicurists and pedicurists in the great state of Kansas.
Now, before you start painting a picture of a nail salon exclusively staffed by individuals named Joelle, let's tamp down those vivid imaginings. This investigation intends to unravel the enigmatic web that ties the moniker "Joelle" to the manicurist and pedicurist workforce in Kansas. Our electrifying journey promises to deliver not just statistical insights, but also a touch of whimsy that may leave you both dazzled and amused.
In this scholarly escapade, we will whisk you away into the realm of correlations and coefficients, where we've uncovered a coefficient of 0.9278516 that warrants more than just a passing glance. As we unravel this peculiar enigma, we invite you to join us in acknowledging that sometimes, truth is stranger than fiction. So, buckle up, brush off any preconceived notions, and let's embark on this lighthearted yet intriguing expedition into the Joelle Effect.

[[RESULTS]]
The nail-biting investigation into the potential relationship between the name Joelle and the abundance of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas has uncovered a robust and eyebrow-raising correlation. The findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.9278516, indicating a strong positive relationship between the popularity of the name Joelle and the number of nail care professionals in the Sunflower State.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8609086 signifies that approximately 86.09% of the variation in the employment of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas can be explained by the prevalence of the name Joelle. This considerable proportion of variance lends weight to the argument that the Joelle Effect may indeed wield a substantial influence on the dynamics of the beauty industry in the state.
The significance level of p < 0.01 adds an extra layer of polish to our findings, demonstrating that the observed correlation is highly unlikely to have occurred by chance alone. This reinforces the notion that the Joelle Effect is more than just a nail-biting coincidence, and its implications may extend beyond the realm of statistical curiosity.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) accompanying these results visually encapsulates the strength of the correlation, depicting a clear and compelling pattern that emphasizes the salient connection between the popularity of the name Joelle and the employment of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas.
These results invite a reimagining of the interplay between nomenclature and occupation, transcending the mundane to unearth an unexpected and perhaps whimsical relationship between the name Joelle and the nail care industry in Kansas. So, with fingers crossed and a touch of humor, we present these findings as a delightful nail in the coffin of the age-old question - is there truly a correlation between a name and the nail care workforce?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation presents a compelling case for the existence of what we playfully dubbed the "Joelle Effect." The robust correlation between the prevalence of the name Joelle and the number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas suggests that there may be more than meets the eye in the beauty industry – perhaps a little more than just "nailing it."

While some may dismiss our findings as mere statistical quirkiness, we are confident that the correlation coefficient of 0.9278516 speaks volumes about the potential impact of names in shaping occupational landscapes. It seems that in Kansas, the "Joelle" phenomenon extends beyond the realm of personal identity and ventures into the colorful world of nail care.

The implications of this correlation may be more than skin-deep, raising questions about the influence of nomenclature on career choices. Perhaps a name like "Joelle" could be synonymous with a penchant for precision, artistry, or just really, really good nail maintenance. As the saying goes, "a rose by any other name would smell as sweet," but what about a manicurist or pedicurist by the name of Joelle?

So, as we wrap up this whimsically intriguing journey into the Joelle Effect, we invite readers to ponder the potential broader significance of seemingly quirky correlations. Our findings may have tickled your funny bone and left you with a newfound appreciation for the peculiar interplay of names and occupations in a quirky way.

In closing, we assert that no further research is needed in this particular area. It's time to give this nail-biting investigation a proper manicure and put the "Joelle Effect" to bed. After all, it's vital to know when to draw the line – or perhaps paint it with an impeccable layer of nail polish.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Nailing Down the Joelle Effect: A Correlational Study of the Influence of the Popularity of the Name Joelle on the Number of Manicurists and Pedicurists in Kansas. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Nail Name Sociology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Nailing Down the Joelle Effect: A Correlational Study of the Influence of the Popularity of the Name Joelle on the Number of Manicurists and Pedicurists in Kansas. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for the Advancement of Ethnolinguistic Anthropology and Cultural Psychology (SAEACP)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Nailing Down the Joelle Effect: A Correlational Study of the Influence of the Popularity of the Name Joelle on the Number of Manicurists and Pedicurists in Kansas with an abstract of This paper presents the findings of an intriguing investigation into the potential relationship between the frequency of the first name Joelle and the employment of manicurists and pedicurists in the state of Kansas. By utilizing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics spanning the years 2003 to 2022, our research team was able to establish a correlation coefficient of 0.9278516 with a significance level of p < 0.01. Our study delves into the implications of this correlation, humorously exploring the possibility that the "Joelle Effect" is indeed more than skin-deep. Additionally, we address the implications of this unexpected connection on the dynamics of the beauty industry and the diffusion of nail-based nomenclature. We invite readers to polish their statistical skills and join us in a lighthearted, yet thought-provoking, exploration of this peculiar phenomenon.

ChatGPT:

"Joelle Effect," "correlation study," "popularity of name Joelle," "manicurists employment," "pedicurists employment," "Kansas," "US Social Security Administration data," "Bureau of Labor Statistics data," "correlation coefficient," "beauty industry dynamics," "nail-based nomenclature," "statistical analysis," "name frequency," "employment trends," "Kansas beauty industry," "implications of correlation," "nail salon industry," "correlational study," "manicure and pedicure employment," "name popularity impact," "statistical significance"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Joelle
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Joelle
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Joelle

The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas

Correlation r = 0.9278516 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8609086 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 86.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Joelle) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.9E-9. 0.0000000038641193812562866000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 3.9E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 258,791,176 random variables You don't actually need 258 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.82, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Joelle (Babies born)269273231252278275244237241243243269260387456439433380405376
The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas (Laborers)23025025018017017014017013014080110280820980830670500600920




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([269,273,231,252,278,275,244,237,241,243,243,269,260,387,456,439,433,380,405,376,])
array_2 = np.array([230,250,250,180,170,170,140,170,130,140,80,110,280,820,980,830,670,500,600,920,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Joelle"
array_2_name = "The number of manicurists and pedicurists in Kansas"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 3082 · Black Variable ID: 3454 · Red Variable ID: 8250
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0