Download png, svg
AI explanation
As the air became cleaner, people in Salt Lake City felt an increased sense of well-being and decided to move away from the city. This led to a decrease in local business activity, ultimately impacting Citigroup's stock price. It's a classic case of 'cleaner air, less citi-folk, lower Citi stock'.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [A photo-realistic image] In a city setting, the streets of Salt Lake City, Utah are filled with a hazy smog as people walk by. In the center, a group of individuals is gathered around a stock ticker display. Their expressions are concerned as they look at the red-flashing Citigroup stock price (C). Above the stock ticker, amidst the polluted air, a thought bubble filled with hot air floats, symbolizing the realization that investing in Citigroup may just be a load of hot air. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's stock price (C). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Voxel art a funny image macro Woodblock painting Low poly A photo-realistic image
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's stock price (C), in the following situation: Because with cleaner air, people are able to think more clearly and make better financial decisions, causing them to realize that investing in Citigroup is just a load of hot air.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Salt Lake City, Utah, the sky is hazy with air pollution as people walk through the city streets. Among them, a group of individuals gathers around a stock ticker display, their brows furrowed in thought. The Citigroup stock price (C) flashes in red, and in the midst of the polluted air, a thought bubble filled with hot air floats above the stock ticker, symbolizing the realization that investing in Citigroup may just be a load of hot air.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In Salt Lake City, Utah, the sky is hazy with air pollution as people walk through the city streets. Among them, a group of individuals gathers around a stock ticker display, their brows furrowed in thought. The Citigroup stock price (C) flashes in red, and in the midst of the polluted air, a thought bubble filled with hot air floats above the stock ticker, symbolizing the realization that investing in Citigroup may just be a load of hot air. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [A photo-realistic image] In a city setting, the streets of Salt Lake City, Utah are filled with a hazy smog as people walk by. In the center, a group of individuals is gathered around a stock ticker display. Their expressions are concerned as they look at the red-flashing Citigroup stock price (C). Above the stock ticker, amidst the polluted air, a thought bubble filled with hot air floats, symbolizing the realization that investing in Citigroup may just be a load of hot air.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah caused Citigroup's stock price (C) to decrease. Make it feel plausible.
AI academic paper
The Smoggy Bottom Line: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's Stock Price The Journal of Environmental Economics and Corporate Profits Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's stock price (C). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7633482 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2023.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Smoggy Bottom Line: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's Stock Price
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Salt Lake City, Utah and the stock price of Citigroup (C). By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7633482 and p < 0.01 for the period of 2002 to 2023. Our findings indicate a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, shedding light on the impact of air quality on financial markets. This research offers a breath of fresh air in the bustling world of economic analysis and shows that even the most unexpected factors can influence stock prices – sometimes, the market truly is just a haze of surprises.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's stock price (C). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Smoggy Bottom Line: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's Stock Price
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Salt Lake City, Utah and the stock price of Citigroup (C). By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7633482 and p < 0.01 for the period of 2002 to 2023. Our findings indicate a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, shedding light on the impact of air quality on financial markets. This research offers a breath of fresh air in the bustling world of economic analysis and shows that even the most unexpected factors can influence stock prices – sometimes, the market truly is just a haze of surprises.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
Introduction
The interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena has always captured the attention of scientists and researchers. From the relationship between coffee consumption and productivity to the correlation between the length of a person's ring finger and their assertiveness, the world is ripe with unexpected connections. In this paper, we delve into a most curious investigation – the association between air pollution levels in Salt Lake City, Utah and the stock price of Citigroup (C).
As we all know, Utah's capital city, Salt Lake City, is renowned for its stunning natural beauty, surrounded by the majestic peaks of the Wasatch Range. However, lurking beneath this scenic panorama is a perennial environmental concern – air pollution. The city's unique geographic features, such as its bowl-like topography, contribute to the entrapment of pollutants, often leading to hazy days and "inversion seasons" that leave residents holding their breath – both literally and figuratively.
On the financial front, Citigroup, a leading global bank, stands as a towering pillar in the world of stock trading. Known for weathering turbulent economic times and navigating the unpredictable waters of the market, the bank's stock price has withstood its fair share of storms.
But what happens when the smoky haze of air pollution collides with the bustling world of finance? Can the gaseous clouds hovering above Salt Lake City exert an unseen gravitational pull on the stock prices of Citigroup?
To answer these burning questions, we embarked on a grand data-driven voyage, armed with statistical tools and economic wisdom. Our findings promise to shed light on this unconventional relationship and offer a revealing glimpse into the mesh of environmental factors and financial markets. Hold your breath, for this research will take you on an exhilarating ride through the swirling mists of curiosity and knowledge.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's stock price (C). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Smoggy Bottom Line: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's Stock Price
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Salt Lake City, Utah and the stock price of Citigroup (C). By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7633482 and p < 0.01 for the period of 2002 to 2023. Our findings indicate a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, shedding light on the impact of air quality on financial markets. This research offers a breath of fresh air in the bustling world of economic analysis and shows that even the most unexpected factors can influence stock prices – sometimes, the market truly is just a haze of surprises.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena has always captured the attention of scientists and researchers. From the relationship between coffee consumption and productivity to the correlation between the length of a person's ring finger and their assertiveness, the world is ripe with unexpected connections. In this paper, we delve into a most curious investigation – the association between air pollution levels in Salt Lake City, Utah and the stock price of Citigroup (C).
As we all know, Utah's capital city, Salt Lake City, is renowned for its stunning natural beauty, surrounded by the majestic peaks of the Wasatch Range. However, lurking beneath this scenic panorama is a perennial environmental concern – air pollution. The city's unique geographic features, such as its bowl-like topography, contribute to the entrapment of pollutants, often leading to hazy days and "inversion seasons" that leave residents holding their breath – both literally and figuratively.
On the financial front, Citigroup, a leading global bank, stands as a towering pillar in the world of stock trading. Known for weathering turbulent economic times and navigating the unpredictable waters of the market, the bank's stock price has withstood its fair share of storms.
But what happens when the smoky haze of air pollution collides with the bustling world of finance? Can the gaseous clouds hovering above Salt Lake City exert an unseen gravitational pull on the stock prices of Citigroup?
To answer these burning questions, we embarked on a grand data-driven voyage, armed with statistical tools and economic wisdom. Our findings promise to shed light on this unconventional relationship and offer a revealing glimpse into the mesh of environmental factors and financial markets. Hold your breath, for this research will take you on an exhilarating ride through the swirling mists of curiosity and knowledge.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The study of unexpected correlations has been a fascinating pursuit for researchers across various disciplines. In their investigation of seemingly unrelated variables, Smith and Doe (2015) unearthed surprising connections between consumer behavior and lunar phases. Similarly, Jones et al. (2018) delved into the uncharted territory of weather patterns and workplace productivity, highlighting the intricate dance between atmospheric conditions and employee efficiency.
Moving into the realm of finance, numerous studies have explored the impact of environmental factors on stock prices. In "Environmental Impacts and Financial Markets" by Greenberg and Thompson (2017), the authors delve into the influence of climate-related events on the financial sector, but remarkably, they overlook the potential impact of specific localized air pollution on individual stock prices, leaving a gap that our current investigation seeks to fill.
In the non-fiction literary domain, books such as "The Economics of Clean Air" by Jaffe and Stavins (1994) and "Polluted and Dangerous: America's Worst Man-Made Environmental Disasters" by Dunn and Jansson (2008), provide valuable insights into the scientific, economic, and ethical dimensions of air pollution. However, these works miss the mark when it comes to examining the whimsical dance between air quality in Salt Lake City and the fluctuation of Citigroup's stock price.
In the realm of fiction, novels like "Smoke and Mirrors" by Fictional Author A. B. Cognito and "Toxic Assets" by Imaginary Writer X. Y. Zany seem to hint at a mysterious connection between environmental hazards and financial intrigue. While purely works of imagination, these books capture the spirit of our current inquiry – drawing attention to the unexpected interplay of pollution and profits.
On a more cinematic note, movies like "Pollution Predicament" and "The Stockbroker's Smoggy Secret" – fictional titles, of course – likely do not exist, but if they did, they would surely add a dramatic flair to our exploration of the enigmatic ties between Salt Lake City's smog and Citigroup's stock price. If we could only step into the realm of celluloid and experience the drama and suspense of air pollution impacting financial markets firsthand, what a spectacle it would be!
As we immerse ourselves in this unconventional and slightly absurd endeavor, it becomes abundantly clear that the intersection of air pollution and stock prices is nothing short of a whimsical enigma, begging to be unraveled. Indeed, the journey ahead promises to be as alluring as it is absurd.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's stock price (C). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2023
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Smoggy Bottom Line: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's Stock Price
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Salt Lake City, Utah and the stock price of Citigroup (C). By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7633482 and p < 0.01 for the period of 2002 to 2023. Our findings indicate a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, shedding light on the impact of air quality on financial markets. This research offers a breath of fresh air in the bustling world of economic analysis and shows that even the most unexpected factors can influence stock prices – sometimes, the market truly is just a haze of surprises.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
The interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena has always captured the attention of scientists and researchers. From the relationship between coffee consumption and productivity to the correlation between the length of a person's ring finger and their assertiveness, the world is ripe with unexpected connections. In this paper, we delve into a most curious investigation – the association between air pollution levels in Salt Lake City, Utah and the stock price of Citigroup (C).
As we all know, Utah's capital city, Salt Lake City, is renowned for its stunning natural beauty, surrounded by the majestic peaks of the Wasatch Range. However, lurking beneath this scenic panorama is a perennial environmental concern – air pollution. The city's unique geographic features, such as its bowl-like topography, contribute to the entrapment of pollutants, often leading to hazy days and "inversion seasons" that leave residents holding their breath – both literally and figuratively.
On the financial front, Citigroup, a leading global bank, stands as a towering pillar in the world of stock trading. Known for weathering turbulent economic times and navigating the unpredictable waters of the market, the bank's stock price has withstood its fair share of storms.
But what happens when the smoky haze of air pollution collides with the bustling world of finance? Can the gaseous clouds hovering above Salt Lake City exert an unseen gravitational pull on the stock prices of Citigroup?
To answer these burning questions, we embarked on a grand data-driven voyage, armed with statistical tools and economic wisdom. Our findings promise to shed light on this unconventional relationship and offer a revealing glimpse into the mesh of environmental factors and financial markets. Hold your breath, for this research will take you on an exhilarating ride through the swirling mists of curiosity and knowledge.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
METHODOLOGY
Data Collection:
To unravel the mysterious dance between air pollution and Citigroup's stock price, we engaged in a quest for data that would unveil their intertwined fate. Our team scoured the vast realms of the internet, navigating through digital forests and valleys, in search of the elusive numbers and trends that would unravel this enigmatic relationship. The primary sources of our treasure trove were the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). We collected data spanning from the year 2002 to 2023, casting our net wide to capture the ebb and flow of both air quality and stock market fluctuations.
Air Pollution Measurement:
In our quest to quantify the presence of air pollutants, we transitioned from seekers of numbers to warriors of gauges. We harnessed the power of cutting-edge air quality monitoring stations and gazed into the depths of their sensor-laden eyes to capture the atmospheric turmoil. With bated breath, we gathered data on various pollutants, including particulate matter, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and ozone levels, woven together in a tapestry of environmental indicators that reflected the city's atmospheric health. Our measurements stood as silent sentinels, tirelessly recording the invisible ballet of chemical interactions in Salt Lake City's air.
Stock Price Analysis:
Meanwhile, in the sprawling maze of the financial world, we embarked on a different kind of odyssey. Armed with economic models and statistical weapons, we delved deep into the labyrinthine realm of stock market data. With each tick and tock of the clock, we charted the fluctuations in Citigroup's stock price, observing its rises and falls, its peaks and valleys, and uncovering the patterns woven into the fabric of the market. We navigated through the tumultuous sea of financial indices, stock market simulations, and the ever-oscillating digits that echoed the pulse of Citigroup's stock.
Statistical Analysis:
With our data in hand, we donned the cloak of statistical sorcery to unravel the complex interplay between these two disparate realms. We summoned the spirits of correlation coefficients and p-values, allowing them to cast their statistical spells upon our data. Our cauldron of numbers bubbled with significance, revealing a correlation coefficient of 0.7633482 and p < 0.01, a result that shimmered like an unexpected gem in the caverns of economic analysis. We performed regression analysis, time series modeling, and various other statistical incantations to illuminate the relationship between air pollution levels in Salt Lake City and Citigroup's stock price, dispelling the shadows of uncertainty and revealing the hidden threads that bound these seemingly unrelated variables.
In the end, our methodology wove together the strands of environmental monitoring, financial analysis, and statistical wizardry, culminating in a tapestry of evidence that illuminates the unexpected correlation between air pollution in Salt Lake City and Citigroup's stock price.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's stock price (C). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .
For the time period 2002 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.7633482, r-squared of 0.5827005, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Smoggy Bottom Line: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's Stock Price
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Salt Lake City, Utah and the stock price of Citigroup (C). By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7633482 and p < 0.01 for the period of 2002 to 2023. Our findings indicate a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, shedding light on the impact of air quality on financial markets. This research offers a breath of fresh air in the bustling world of economic analysis and shows that even the most unexpected factors can influence stock prices – sometimes, the market truly is just a haze of surprises.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
The interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena has always captured the attention of scientists and researchers. From the relationship between coffee consumption and productivity to the correlation between the length of a person's ring finger and their assertiveness, the world is ripe with unexpected connections. In this paper, we delve into a most curious investigation – the association between air pollution levels in Salt Lake City, Utah and the stock price of Citigroup (C).
As we all know, Utah's capital city, Salt Lake City, is renowned for its stunning natural beauty, surrounded by the majestic peaks of the Wasatch Range. However, lurking beneath this scenic panorama is a perennial environmental concern – air pollution. The city's unique geographic features, such as its bowl-like topography, contribute to the entrapment of pollutants, often leading to hazy days and "inversion seasons" that leave residents holding their breath – both literally and figuratively.
On the financial front, Citigroup, a leading global bank, stands as a towering pillar in the world of stock trading. Known for weathering turbulent economic times and navigating the unpredictable waters of the market, the bank's stock price has withstood its fair share of storms.
But what happens when the smoky haze of air pollution collides with the bustling world of finance? Can the gaseous clouds hovering above Salt Lake City exert an unseen gravitational pull on the stock prices of Citigroup?
To answer these burning questions, we embarked on a grand data-driven voyage, armed with statistical tools and economic wisdom. Our findings promise to shed light on this unconventional relationship and offer a revealing glimpse into the mesh of environmental factors and financial markets. Hold your breath, for this research will take you on an exhilarating ride through the swirling mists of curiosity and knowledge.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between air pollution levels in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's stock price (C). The correlation coefficient of 0.7633482 and r-squared of 0.5827005 indicated a robust relationship between these unlikely bedfellows. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our results met the standard threshold for statistical significance, suggesting that the observed correlation was not a mere fluke.
As depicted in Fig. 1, the scatterplot clearly illustrates the upward trend between air pollution levels and Citigroup's stock price. It's almost as if the smog in Salt Lake City is whispering stock market secrets to astute investors. Who knew that pollution could be a breath of fresh investment insight?
The findings of this study have implications that reach far beyond the picturesque valleys of Utah. By highlighting the influence of air quality on stock prices, our research adds a dimension to the understanding of market trends. It reminds us that, in the high-stakes world of finance, even the air we breathe can have an impact on the bottom line. After all, it seems that where there's smog, there's profit – a most unexpected and punny twist in the world of economic analysis.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's stock price (C). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
The Smoggy Bottom Line: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's Stock Price
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Salt Lake City, Utah and the stock price of Citigroup (C). By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7633482 and p < 0.01 for the period of 2002 to 2023. Our findings indicate a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, shedding light on the impact of air quality on financial markets. This research offers a breath of fresh air in the bustling world of economic analysis and shows that even the most unexpected factors can influence stock prices – sometimes, the market truly is just a haze of surprises.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The study of unexpected correlations has been a fascinating pursuit for researchers across various disciplines. In their investigation of seemingly unrelated variables, Smith and Doe (2015) unearthed surprising connections between consumer behavior and lunar phases. Similarly, Jones et al. (2018) delved into the uncharted territory of weather patterns and workplace productivity, highlighting the intricate dance between atmospheric conditions and employee efficiency.
Moving into the realm of finance, numerous studies have explored the impact of environmental factors on stock prices. In "Environmental Impacts and Financial Markets" by Greenberg and Thompson (2017), the authors delve into the influence of climate-related events on the financial sector, but remarkably, they overlook the potential impact of specific localized air pollution on individual stock prices, leaving a gap that our current investigation seeks to fill.
In the non-fiction literary domain, books such as "The Economics of Clean Air" by Jaffe and Stavins (1994) and "Polluted and Dangerous: America's Worst Man-Made Environmental Disasters" by Dunn and Jansson (2008), provide valuable insights into the scientific, economic, and ethical dimensions of air pollution. However, these works miss the mark when it comes to examining the whimsical dance between air quality in Salt Lake City and the fluctuation of Citigroup's stock price.
In the realm of fiction, novels like "Smoke and Mirrors" by Fictional Author A. B. Cognito and "Toxic Assets" by Imaginary Writer X. Y. Zany seem to hint at a mysterious connection between environmental hazards and financial intrigue. While purely works of imagination, these books capture the spirit of our current inquiry – drawing attention to the unexpected interplay of pollution and profits.
On a more cinematic note, movies like "Pollution Predicament" and "The Stockbroker's Smoggy Secret" – fictional titles, of course – likely do not exist, but if they did, they would surely add a dramatic flair to our exploration of the enigmatic ties between Salt Lake City's smog and Citigroup's stock price. If we could only step into the realm of celluloid and experience the drama and suspense of air pollution impacting financial markets firsthand, what a spectacle it would be!
As we immerse ourselves in this unconventional and slightly absurd endeavor, it becomes abundantly clear that the intersection of air pollution and stock prices is nothing short of a whimsical enigma, begging to be unraveled. Indeed, the journey ahead promises to be as alluring as it is absurd.
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between air pollution levels in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's stock price (C). The correlation coefficient of 0.7633482 and r-squared of 0.5827005 indicated a robust relationship between these unlikely bedfellows. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our results met the standard threshold for statistical significance, suggesting that the observed correlation was not a mere fluke.
As depicted in Fig. 1, the scatterplot clearly illustrates the upward trend between air pollution levels and Citigroup's stock price. It's almost as if the smog in Salt Lake City is whispering stock market secrets to astute investors. Who knew that pollution could be a breath of fresh investment insight?
The findings of this study have implications that reach far beyond the picturesque valleys of Utah. By highlighting the influence of air quality on stock prices, our research adds a dimension to the understanding of market trends. It reminds us that, in the high-stakes world of finance, even the air we breathe can have an impact on the bottom line. After all, it seems that where there's smog, there's profit – a most unexpected and punny twist in the world of economic analysis.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
The results of this investigation into the relationship between air pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's stock price (C) have certainly left us breathless with excitement. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.7633482, supported by a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, provides compelling evidence in support of the initial hypothesis. It appears that the smog in Salt Lake City has not only clouded the skies but also woven itself into the fabric of financial markets, influencing Citigroup's stock price in a most unexpected way.
Our findings resonate with the amusingly unexpected correlations brought to light in previous research. Just as Smith and Doe marveled at the impact of lunar phases on consumer behavior and Jones et al. uncovered the influence of weather patterns on workplace productivity, we too find ourselves marveling at the unlikely dance between pollution and profit. Who could have imagined that the murky haze hanging overhead could hold sway over the stock market, spinning an invisible web of influence on Citigroup's stock price?
This study also echoes the gap in the research highlighted by Greenberg and Thompson (2017), who, despite delving into the impacts of climate-related events on the financial sector, overlooked the potential influence of localized air pollution on individual stock prices. Our findings fill this void, painting a clear picture of the tangible connection between Salt Lake City's air quality and Citigroup's stock price. It seems that as we look to the skies for investment insight, it's not just the economic clouds that hold sway over the market – perhaps the literal clouds, or rather, smog, have a role to play as well.
As we ponder the implications of our results, it becomes apparent that the whimsical dance between air pollution and stock prices is not only amusing but holds practical relevance. Our findings serve as a reminder that in the dynamic world of finance, even the most unexpected factors can cast a shadow over market trends – in this case, quite literally. The smoggy bottom line of this study is clear: air quality in Salt Lake City is more than just a matter of environmental concern; it also has tangible influence on the financial realm, making it a significant factor for investors to consider. The haze of uncertainty surrounding the economy may just have a very literal source in the skies above.
Reflecting on the unexpected twists and turns of this exploration, it seems that the whimsical enigma of air pollution's influence on stock prices is, indeed, a breath of fresh investment insight. Who knew that the smog in Salt Lake City could whisper stock market secrets, proving that where there's smog, there's profit? This unexpected and punny twist in the world of economic analysis certainly lends some levity to the serious business of market research.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's stock price (C). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Smoggy Bottom Line: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's Stock Price
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we explore the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Salt Lake City, Utah and the stock price of Citigroup (C). By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7633482 and p < 0.01 for the period of 2002 to 2023. Our findings indicate a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, shedding light on the impact of air quality on financial markets. This research offers a breath of fresh air in the bustling world of economic analysis and shows that even the most unexpected factors can influence stock prices – sometimes, the market truly is just a haze of surprises.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
The interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated phenomena has always captured the attention of scientists and researchers. From the relationship between coffee consumption and productivity to the correlation between the length of a person's ring finger and their assertiveness, the world is ripe with unexpected connections. In this paper, we delve into a most curious investigation – the association between air pollution levels in Salt Lake City, Utah and the stock price of Citigroup (C).
As we all know, Utah's capital city, Salt Lake City, is renowned for its stunning natural beauty, surrounded by the majestic peaks of the Wasatch Range. However, lurking beneath this scenic panorama is a perennial environmental concern – air pollution. The city's unique geographic features, such as its bowl-like topography, contribute to the entrapment of pollutants, often leading to hazy days and "inversion seasons" that leave residents holding their breath – both literally and figuratively.
On the financial front, Citigroup, a leading global bank, stands as a towering pillar in the world of stock trading. Known for weathering turbulent economic times and navigating the unpredictable waters of the market, the bank's stock price has withstood its fair share of storms.
But what happens when the smoky haze of air pollution collides with the bustling world of finance? Can the gaseous clouds hovering above Salt Lake City exert an unseen gravitational pull on the stock prices of Citigroup?
To answer these burning questions, we embarked on a grand data-driven voyage, armed with statistical tools and economic wisdom. Our findings promise to shed light on this unconventional relationship and offer a revealing glimpse into the mesh of environmental factors and financial markets. Hold your breath, for this research will take you on an exhilarating ride through the swirling mists of curiosity and knowledge.
[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between air pollution levels in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's stock price (C). The correlation coefficient of 0.7633482 and r-squared of 0.5827005 indicated a robust relationship between these unlikely bedfellows. With a p-value of less than 0.01, our results met the standard threshold for statistical significance, suggesting that the observed correlation was not a mere fluke.
As depicted in Fig. 1, the scatterplot clearly illustrates the upward trend between air pollution levels and Citigroup's stock price. It's almost as if the smog in Salt Lake City is whispering stock market secrets to astute investors. Who knew that pollution could be a breath of fresh investment insight?
The findings of this study have implications that reach far beyond the picturesque valleys of Utah. By highlighting the influence of air quality on stock prices, our research adds a dimension to the understanding of market trends. It reminds us that, in the high-stakes world of finance, even the air we breathe can have an impact on the bottom line. After all, it seems that where there's smog, there's profit – a most unexpected and punny twist in the world of economic analysis.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our study has unveiled a seemingly ethereal yet undeniably tangible connection between the atmospheric murk of Salt Lake City and the fortunes of our beloved Citigroup (C). As the data reflect, the correlation between air pollution levels and Citigroup's stock price is as strong as the resolve of Utahns enduring inversion seasons.
It's truly a breath of fresh air to witness the impact of air quality on financial markets—a notion that was previously obscured by the haze of conventional economic wisdom. One can't help but wonder if there's a new type of "Gross Domestic Smogduct" that we should be considering in our economic models. Perhaps future investment strategies should include an "Eco-valuation" component, weighing not just financial performance but also the lungs of the local populace.
Let's not forget the potential for a "Pollution Premium" in stock prices - after all, smog might just be the new black gold in the trading world. Who knew that gas masks could be the next haute couture accessory on Wall Street?
However, as much fun as it has been to delve into this unconventional relationship, it seems that we've sucked all the air out of this particular research balloon. Further studies on the connection between air pollution and stock prices may risk being a mere exercise in "hot air" - a contribution that may just end up being a "smog screen" in the world of economic inquiry. Therefore, we assert that no more research is needed in this area.
In the end, this study leaves us with a lingering question: if "C" stands for both Citigroup and the chemical symbol for carbon, could it be that the key to understanding stock market fluctuations lies in the very air we breathe? It's a thought to ponder, especially the next time you're contemplating a stock trade while gazing at a smoggy skyline.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Smoggy Bottom Line: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Environmental Economics and Corporate Profits
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Smoggy Bottom Line: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Center for Environmental and Financial Analysis
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Smoggy Bottom Line: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's Stock Price with an abstract of In this study, we explore the intriguing connection between air pollution levels in Salt Lake City, Utah and the stock price of Citigroup (C). By utilizing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7633482 and p < 0.01 for the period of 2002 to 2023. Our findings indicate a statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables, shedding light on the impact of air quality on financial markets. This research offers a breath of fresh air in the bustling world of economic analysis and shows that even the most unexpected factors can influence stock prices – sometimes, the market truly is just a haze of surprises.
ChatGPT:
air pollution, Salt Lake City, Utah, Citigroup, stock price, correlation, Environmental Protection Agency, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, air quality, financial markets, economic analysis, stock prices
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Air pollution in Salt Lake City, UtahDetailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Salt Lake City, UT
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah
Citigroup's stock price (C)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Citigroup (C) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
See what else correlates with Citigroup's stock price (C)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.5827005 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 58.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Citigroup's stock price (C)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah) over the 22 years from 2002 through 2023.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.6E-5. 0.0000358538293178323500000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.76 in 0.0036% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 27,891 random variables You don't actually need 27 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 21 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 21 because we have two variables measured over a period of 22 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.5, 0.9 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | |
Air pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah (Bad air quality days) | 18.0822 | 10.6849 | 15.0273 | 16.4384 | 14.7945 | 17.2603 | 9.01639 | 10.137 | 6.57534 | 8.21918 | 4.64481 | 13.6986 | 6.30137 | 7.39726 | 7.65027 | 13.1507 | 11.7808 | 4.65753 | 5.7377 | 13.1507 | 6.0274 | 5.83942 |
Citigroup's stock price (C) (Stock price) | 500.2 | 357 | 490.5 | 490 | 490 | 556.6 | 297.3 | 68.7 | 33.6 | 47.8 | 27.13 | 40.91 | 52.03 | 54.36 | 50.75 | 60.68 | 75.09 | 50.68 | 80.13 | 61.59 | 61.18 | 45.75 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([18.0822,10.6849,15.0273,16.4384,14.7945,17.2603,9.01639,10.137,6.57534,8.21918,4.64481,13.6986,6.30137,7.39726,7.65027,13.1507,11.7808,4.65753,5.7377,13.1507,6.0274,5.83942,])
array_2 = np.array([500.2,357,490.5,490,490,556.6,297.3,68.7,33.6,47.8,27.13,40.91,52.03,54.36,50.75,60.68,75.09,50.68,80.13,61.59,61.18,45.75,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah"
array_2_name = "Citigroup's stock price (C)"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Air pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah
- Line chart for only Citigroup's stock price (C)
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: The Smoggy Bottom Line: Investigating the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Salt Lake City, Utah and Citigroup's Stock Price
Your rating is stellar!
Correlation ID: 3075 · Black Variable ID: 21196 · Red Variable ID: 1657