about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,065 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and the second variable is Liquefied petroleum gas used in Montenegro.  The chart goes from 2006 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the winning team celebrated, their exuberant cheers unknowingly caused tiny seismic vibrations. These vibrations traveled through the Earth's crust, ultimately leading to a slight increase in the geological activity in Montenegro. This, in turn, somehow stimulated the production and usage of LPG. Or perhaps the goals were just so incendiary that they sparked a nationwide LPG usage frenzy as fans attempted to reenact the fiery passion on the soccer field!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image depicting a scene reminiscent of Skyrim, featuring a victorious soccer team celebrating with fireworks and creating a surge in demand for propane in Montenegro. The image should capture the night sky illuminated by pyrotechnics and the glow of fiery victory parties across the country, highlighting the increased usage of liquefied petroleum gas. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Montenegro. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Realistic Macabre a Polaroid photo A scene from Skyrim Cubism
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Montenegro, in the following situation: Liquefied petroleum gas used in Montenegro increased because as the number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final increased, so did the celebratory pyrotechnics and subsequent demand for propane to power the victory party flame effects. The more goals, the more flames - it's simple sports science.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final, the winning team scored a record five goals, triggering a surge of celebratory pyrotechnics. As the fireworks illuminated the night sky, the demand for propane surged in Montenegro, where the increased usage of liquefied petroleum gas was evident in the bright flames lighting up victory parties across the country.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: In the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final, the winning team scored a record five goals, triggering a surge of celebratory pyrotechnics. As the fireworks illuminated the night sky, the demand for propane surged in Montenegro, where the increased usage of liquefied petroleum gas was evident in the bright flames lighting up victory parties across the country. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image depicting a scene reminiscent of Skyrim, featuring a victorious soccer team celebrating with fireworks and creating a surge in demand for propane in Montenegro. The image should capture the night sky illuminated by pyrotechnics and the glow of fiery victory parties across the country, highlighting the increased usage of liquefied petroleum gas.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final positively influenced Liquefied petroleum gas used in Montenegro.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Goalie's Gas: Exploring the Relationship Between NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final Scores and LPG Consumption in Montenegro

The Journal of Sports Science and Social Sciences

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Montenegro. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from NCAA and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.6564342 and p < 0.01 for 2006 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Goalie's Gas: Exploring the Relationship Between NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final Scores and LPG Consumption in Montenegro

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the curious connection between the number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Montenegro. Utilizing data from the NCAA and Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this seemingly improbable link. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.6564342 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2006 to 2021. Our research challenges conventional wisdom and encourages a fresh perspective on the potential interplay between sports outcomes and energy usage. Through a lighthearted yet rigorous analysis, we aim to infuse scholarly discourse with a touch of whimsy and offer a novel perspective on the seemingly unrelated domains of sports and energy consumption. So, put on your academia-jersey, and let's kick off this investigation with a goal-scoring and gas-sensing twist!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Montenegro. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Goalie's Gas: Exploring the Relationship Between NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final Scores and LPG Consumption in Montenegro

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the curious connection between the number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Montenegro. Utilizing data from the NCAA and Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this seemingly improbable link. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.6564342 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2006 to 2021. Our research challenges conventional wisdom and encourages a fresh perspective on the potential interplay between sports outcomes and energy usage. Through a lighthearted yet rigorous analysis, we aim to infuse scholarly discourse with a touch of whimsy and offer a novel perspective on the seemingly unrelated domains of sports and energy consumption. So, put on your academia-jersey, and let's kick off this investigation with a goal-scoring and gas-sensing twist!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

Picture this: a soccer ball soaring through the air, a goalkeeper leaping desperately to make the save, and a group of researchers scratching their heads, pondering the seemingly absurd question – could the number of goals scored in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final actually have an impact on the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Montenegro? Yes, dear readers, we find ourselves delving into the perplexing world of sports and energy, where the improbable becomes the intriguing and the unimaginable becomes the undeniable.

As we embark on this academic endeavor, we are compelled to ask: what could possibly be the connection between the exhilarating goals on the pitch and the humble gas consumption in Montenegro? It's like trying to find the link between a penalty shootout and a barbecue – unexpected, curious, and oddly captivating. But fear not, dear readers, for we are here not only to unravel this enigmatic association but also to infuse a bit of merriment and whimsy into the typically solemn terrain of academic research.

The field of sports and energy may seem like an odd pairing, much like a soccer player wearing cleats to a formal soirée, but our aim is to challenge convention and galvanize scholarly discourse with a fresh perspective. With a dash of levity and a sprinkle of statistical rigor, our research endeavors to bridge the gap between the thrill of athletic competition and the practicalities of energy consumption. So, let's kick off this investigation with a goal-scoring and gas-sensing twist, shall we? Lace up your scholarly boots, dear readers, and get ready to score one for the curious minds!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Montenegro. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading the backs of shampoo bottles.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Goalie's Gas: Exploring the Relationship Between NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final Scores and LPG Consumption in Montenegro

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the curious connection between the number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Montenegro. Utilizing data from the NCAA and Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this seemingly improbable link. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.6564342 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2006 to 2021. Our research challenges conventional wisdom and encourages a fresh perspective on the potential interplay between sports outcomes and energy usage. Through a lighthearted yet rigorous analysis, we aim to infuse scholarly discourse with a touch of whimsy and offer a novel perspective on the seemingly unrelated domains of sports and energy consumption. So, put on your academia-jersey, and let's kick off this investigation with a goal-scoring and gas-sensing twist!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Picture this: a soccer ball soaring through the air, a goalkeeper leaping desperately to make the save, and a group of researchers scratching their heads, pondering the seemingly absurd question – could the number of goals scored in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final actually have an impact on the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Montenegro? Yes, dear readers, we find ourselves delving into the perplexing world of sports and energy, where the improbable becomes the intriguing and the unimaginable becomes the undeniable.
As we embark on this academic endeavor, we are compelled to ask: what could possibly be the connection between the exhilarating goals on the pitch and the humble gas consumption in Montenegro? It's like trying to find the link between a penalty shootout and a barbecue – unexpected, curious, and oddly captivating. But fear not, dear readers, for we are here not only to unravel this enigmatic association but also to infuse a bit of merriment and whimsy into the typically solemn terrain of academic research.
The field of sports and energy may seem like an odd pairing, much like a soccer player wearing cleats to a formal soirée, but our aim is to challenge convention and galvanize scholarly discourse with a fresh perspective. With a dash of levity and a sprinkle of statistical rigor, our research endeavors to bridge the gap between the thrill of athletic competition and the practicalities of energy consumption. So, let's kick off this investigation with a goal-scoring and gas-sensing twist, shall we? Lace up your scholarly boots, dear readers, and get ready to score one for the curious minds!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find a significant positive correlation between the number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and the levels of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) consumption in Montenegro. The study highlights the unexpected interplay between sports outcomes and energy usage, introducing a fascinating dimension to the seemingly unrelated realms of soccer and gas consumption. Building on this peculiar association, "Doe and Jones" emphasize the potential impact of sports victories on consumer behavior, suggesting that celebratory events may lead to increased energy consumption, including, apparently, the use of LPG in Montenegro.

Turning to non-fiction sources, "Soccer and Sustainability" explores the environmental impact of soccer events and the associated energy usage, shedding light on the ripple effects of sports competitions on energy consumption patterns. Similarly, "Energy Economics" delves into the complexities of energy markets and consumption dynamics, offering insights into the multifaceted factors influencing gas usage in various regions. As we venture into the realm of fiction, "The Goal Scorer's Gambit" and "The LPG League" provide fictional narratives that, while unrelated to the actual topic at hand, add a touch of whimsy to our exploration of soccer and gas usage.

Moving beyond the traditional confines of scholarly research, I must confess that I conducted an unconventional literature review, venturing into uncharted territories of knowledge acquisition. This involved perusing the back labels of LPG canisters, where I stumbled upon an unexpected wealth of wisdom and insight. The meticulous examination of shampoo bottles also proved surprisingly illuminating, offering profound reflections on the elusive connection between sports triumphs and energy consumption. This unorthodox approach may raise eyebrows in academic circles, but it has undeniably broadened my perspective and enriched the interdisciplinary tapestry of our inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Montenegro. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from NCAA and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2006 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Goalie's Gas: Exploring the Relationship Between NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final Scores and LPG Consumption in Montenegro

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the curious connection between the number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Montenegro. Utilizing data from the NCAA and Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this seemingly improbable link. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.6564342 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2006 to 2021. Our research challenges conventional wisdom and encourages a fresh perspective on the potential interplay between sports outcomes and energy usage. Through a lighthearted yet rigorous analysis, we aim to infuse scholarly discourse with a touch of whimsy and offer a novel perspective on the seemingly unrelated domains of sports and energy consumption. So, put on your academia-jersey, and let's kick off this investigation with a goal-scoring and gas-sensing twist!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Picture this: a soccer ball soaring through the air, a goalkeeper leaping desperately to make the save, and a group of researchers scratching their heads, pondering the seemingly absurd question – could the number of goals scored in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final actually have an impact on the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Montenegro? Yes, dear readers, we find ourselves delving into the perplexing world of sports and energy, where the improbable becomes the intriguing and the unimaginable becomes the undeniable.
As we embark on this academic endeavor, we are compelled to ask: what could possibly be the connection between the exhilarating goals on the pitch and the humble gas consumption in Montenegro? It's like trying to find the link between a penalty shootout and a barbecue – unexpected, curious, and oddly captivating. But fear not, dear readers, for we are here not only to unravel this enigmatic association but also to infuse a bit of merriment and whimsy into the typically solemn terrain of academic research.
The field of sports and energy may seem like an odd pairing, much like a soccer player wearing cleats to a formal soirée, but our aim is to challenge convention and galvanize scholarly discourse with a fresh perspective. With a dash of levity and a sprinkle of statistical rigor, our research endeavors to bridge the gap between the thrill of athletic competition and the practicalities of energy consumption. So, let's kick off this investigation with a goal-scoring and gas-sensing twist, shall we? Lace up your scholarly boots, dear readers, and get ready to score one for the curious minds!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the tantalizing connection between the number of goals scored in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Montenegro, our research team embarked on a spirited and at times, comically convoluted, methodological journey. Akin to the nimble footwork of a soccer player on the pitch, our data collection and analysis involved deft maneuvering and a hint of whimsy.

Data Collection:
We scoured the vast expanse of the internet, traversing through the virtual penalty box of online databases, to procure the requisite data for our investigation. The primary sources of our data were the NCAA for soccer final scores and the Energy Information Administration for LPG consumption in Montenegro. We meticulously sifted through data spanning from 2006 to 2021, ensuring a robust and extensive dataset, much like a goalkeeper guarding the goalpost with unwavering precision.

Statistical Analysis:
With our data in hand, we unleashed the arsenal of statistical tools at our disposal, crafting an analysis strategy that would make even the most astute soccer tactician nod in approval. Firstly, we computed the correlation coefficient, employing it to unveil the degree of association between the goal-scoring frenzy at the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and LPG consumption in Montenegro. Subsequently, we conducted a rigorous regression analysis to disentangle the intricate interplay between these seemingly disparate variables. Our statistical endeavors were akin to executing a seamless passing sequence on the field, seamlessly transitioning from one analytical play to the next.

Modelling and Predictive Analytics:
In a dash of audacious flair, we delved into the realm of predictive analytics, constructing models that sought to forecast the influence of NCAA soccer final scores on LPG consumption in Montenegro. The artful precision with which we crafted these models was akin to a maestro conducting a symphony, orchestrating variables and coefficients to harmonize in a melodious blend of statistical sophistication.

Sensitivity Analysis:
To ensure the robustness of our findings, we subjected our analysis to a rigorous sensitivity examination, akin to a stringent referee scrutinizing every play for fouls. We probed the potential impact of outliers and variations, fortifying the foundations of our research with a thorough exploration of potential sensitivities.

In the spirit of scholarly inquisitiveness and a touch of whimsy, our methodological approach was designed to pave the way for a playful yet comprehensive exploration of the interplay between goal-scoring theatrics and LPG consumption in the picturesque landscape of Montenegro. With our methodological playbook firmly in hand, we approached this investigation with a lively determination and an unwavering commitment to infuse academic research with a dose of comic relief.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Montenegro. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from NCAA and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2006 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.6564342, r-squared of 0.4309059, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Goalie's Gas: Exploring the Relationship Between NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final Scores and LPG Consumption in Montenegro

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the curious connection between the number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Montenegro. Utilizing data from the NCAA and Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this seemingly improbable link. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.6564342 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2006 to 2021. Our research challenges conventional wisdom and encourages a fresh perspective on the potential interplay between sports outcomes and energy usage. Through a lighthearted yet rigorous analysis, we aim to infuse scholarly discourse with a touch of whimsy and offer a novel perspective on the seemingly unrelated domains of sports and energy consumption. So, put on your academia-jersey, and let's kick off this investigation with a goal-scoring and gas-sensing twist!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
Picture this: a soccer ball soaring through the air, a goalkeeper leaping desperately to make the save, and a group of researchers scratching their heads, pondering the seemingly absurd question – could the number of goals scored in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final actually have an impact on the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Montenegro? Yes, dear readers, we find ourselves delving into the perplexing world of sports and energy, where the improbable becomes the intriguing and the unimaginable becomes the undeniable.
As we embark on this academic endeavor, we are compelled to ask: what could possibly be the connection between the exhilarating goals on the pitch and the humble gas consumption in Montenegro? It's like trying to find the link between a penalty shootout and a barbecue – unexpected, curious, and oddly captivating. But fear not, dear readers, for we are here not only to unravel this enigmatic association but also to infuse a bit of merriment and whimsy into the typically solemn terrain of academic research.
The field of sports and energy may seem like an odd pairing, much like a soccer player wearing cleats to a formal soirée, but our aim is to challenge convention and galvanize scholarly discourse with a fresh perspective. With a dash of levity and a sprinkle of statistical rigor, our research endeavors to bridge the gap between the thrill of athletic competition and the practicalities of energy consumption. So, let's kick off this investigation with a goal-scoring and gas-sensing twist, shall we? Lace up your scholarly boots, dear readers, and get ready to score one for the curious minds!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Upon analyzing the data collected from the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final scores and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Montenegro, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6564342, indicating a relatively strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This finding suggests that as the number of goals scored by the winning team in the championship final increases, there is a tendency for LPG consumption in Montenegro to also rise. It's like witnessing an uptick in soccer excitement leading to a surge in gas usage – a goal-scoring spectacle stimulating the gas meters, if you will.

Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.4309059 indicates that approximately 43% of the variability in LPG consumption in Montenegro can be explained by the number of goals scored in the championship final. This statistically significant association left us pleasantly surprised, akin to a last-minute goal that turns the game on its head.

The p-value of less than 0.01 reinforces the robustness of our findings, suggesting that the observed correlation is not a mere fluke but a meaningful pattern. It's as if the soccer field and the gas stations have been secretly communicating, orchestrating an unforeseen dance of numbers and outcomes.

To visually illustrate this captivating relationship, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that showcases the striking correlation between the number of goals scored in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and LPG consumption in Montenegro. This figure serves as a testament to the unexpected but unmistakable connection between these two seemingly unrelated domains, offering a visual feast for the analytical souls and a splash of humor for the academically inclined.

In conclusion, our results highlight a surprising relationship between the thrill of soccer victories and the utilitarian reality of gas usage in Montenegro. It's as if the cheers of the fans on the pitch echo through the streets, inspiring a surge in gas-fueled activities. This unanticipated correlation encourages further exploration of the interplay between sports outcomes and energy consumption, injecting a dash of amusement into the typically serious discussions of academia. So, as we wrap up this section, let's raise a scholarly toast to the unexpected connections and embrace the whimsy of statistical analyses.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Montenegro. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Goalie's Gas: Exploring the Relationship Between NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final Scores and LPG Consumption in Montenegro

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the curious connection between the number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Montenegro. Utilizing data from the NCAA and Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this seemingly improbable link. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.6564342 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2006 to 2021. Our research challenges conventional wisdom and encourages a fresh perspective on the potential interplay between sports outcomes and energy usage. Through a lighthearted yet rigorous analysis, we aim to infuse scholarly discourse with a touch of whimsy and offer a novel perspective on the seemingly unrelated domains of sports and energy consumption. So, put on your academia-jersey, and let's kick off this investigation with a goal-scoring and gas-sensing twist!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find a significant positive correlation between the number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and the levels of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) consumption in Montenegro. The study highlights the unexpected interplay between sports outcomes and energy usage, introducing a fascinating dimension to the seemingly unrelated realms of soccer and gas consumption. Building on this peculiar association, "Doe and Jones" emphasize the potential impact of sports victories on consumer behavior, suggesting that celebratory events may lead to increased energy consumption, including, apparently, the use of LPG in Montenegro.
Turning to non-fiction sources, "Soccer and Sustainability" explores the environmental impact of soccer events and the associated energy usage, shedding light on the ripple effects of sports competitions on energy consumption patterns. Similarly, "Energy Economics" delves into the complexities of energy markets and consumption dynamics, offering insights into the multifaceted factors influencing gas usage in various regions. As we venture into the realm of fiction, "The Goal Scorer's Gambit" and "The LPG League" provide fictional narratives that, while unrelated to the actual topic at hand, add a touch of whimsy to our exploration of soccer and gas usage.
Moving beyond the traditional confines of scholarly research, I must confess that I conducted an unconventional literature review, venturing into uncharted territories of knowledge acquisition. This involved perusing the back labels of LPG canisters, where I stumbled upon an unexpected wealth of wisdom and insight. The meticulous examination of shampoo bottles also proved surprisingly illuminating, offering profound reflections on the elusive connection between sports triumphs and energy consumption. This unorthodox approach may raise eyebrows in academic circles, but it has undeniably broadened my perspective and enriched the interdisciplinary tapestry of our inquiry.

[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the data collected from the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final scores and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Montenegro, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6564342, indicating a relatively strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This finding suggests that as the number of goals scored by the winning team in the championship final increases, there is a tendency for LPG consumption in Montenegro to also rise. It's like witnessing an uptick in soccer excitement leading to a surge in gas usage – a goal-scoring spectacle stimulating the gas meters, if you will.
Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.4309059 indicates that approximately 43% of the variability in LPG consumption in Montenegro can be explained by the number of goals scored in the championship final. This statistically significant association left us pleasantly surprised, akin to a last-minute goal that turns the game on its head.
The p-value of less than 0.01 reinforces the robustness of our findings, suggesting that the observed correlation is not a mere fluke but a meaningful pattern. It's as if the soccer field and the gas stations have been secretly communicating, orchestrating an unforeseen dance of numbers and outcomes.
To visually illustrate this captivating relationship, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that showcases the striking correlation between the number of goals scored in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and LPG consumption in Montenegro. This figure serves as a testament to the unexpected but unmistakable connection between these two seemingly unrelated domains, offering a visual feast for the analytical souls and a splash of humor for the academically inclined.
In conclusion, our results highlight a surprising relationship between the thrill of soccer victories and the utilitarian reality of gas usage in Montenegro. It's as if the cheers of the fans on the pitch echo through the streets, inspiring a surge in gas-fueled activities. This unanticipated correlation encourages further exploration of the interplay between sports outcomes and energy consumption, injecting a dash of amusement into the typically serious discussions of academia. So, as we wrap up this section, let's raise a scholarly toast to the unexpected connections and embrace the whimsy of statistical analyses.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

In the spirit of scholarly jest, let's delve into the delightful nuances of our findings – a whimsical waltz between soccer glory and gas consumption in Montenegro. The surprising correlation we unveiled conjures a comical image of soccer fans celebrating a thrilling victory while simultaneously igniting a surge in LPG usage across the Montenegrin landscape. It's as though each goal scored in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final fuels not only the team's triumph but also the gas meters of this small European country. Our results confirm and build upon the curious insights put forth by "Smith et al.," infusing this seemingly improbable relationship with a touch of statistical veracity.

Drawing from the wacky wisdom of "Doe and Jones," who hinted at the influence of sports victories on consumer behavior, our study introduces a riotous twist by showcasing how soccer triumphs could inspire a spike in LPG consumption. This correlation may seem as inexplicable as finding a soccer ball in a gas station, but our rigorous analysis unravels the statistical threads connecting these disparate domains.

Extricating ourselves from the zany labyrinth of scholarly citations, let's revisit the unconventional sources we explored in our literature review. While the back labels of LPG canisters and the enigmatic musings of shampoo bottles may have initially raised eyebrows, our findings justify this unconventional research approach by reinforcing the truly unexpected nature of the relationship between soccer finals and gas consumption. The improbable interplay between these realms is akin to discovering a soccer ball masquerading as a propane tank in a comedy of interconnectedness.

In essence, our findings not only validate the prior research that hinted at the whimsical association between sports outcomes and energy usage but also add a layer of statistical rigor to this playfully perplexing connection. Our scatterplot, akin to a visual punchline in the scholarly comedy of errors, showcases the undeniable correlation between goal-scoring fervor and LPG usage, serving as a graphical testament to the improbable romance between sports finals and gas consumption.

As we reflect on the results, it's evident that our study injects a delightful dose of humor into the traditionally austere corridors of academia. The ball's in the court now for future research to further embrace this amusing intersection between soccer glory and gas gauges, offering a pitch-perfect blend of statistical veracity and scholarly whimsy. So, until we pen the next chapter of this eccentric saga, let's savor the playful dance of numbers and outcomes that left us pleasantly surprised and scholarly amused.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Montenegro. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Goalie's Gas: Exploring the Relationship Between NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final Scores and LPG Consumption in Montenegro

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we investigate the curious connection between the number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Montenegro. Utilizing data from the NCAA and Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this seemingly improbable link. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.6564342 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2006 to 2021. Our research challenges conventional wisdom and encourages a fresh perspective on the potential interplay between sports outcomes and energy usage. Through a lighthearted yet rigorous analysis, we aim to infuse scholarly discourse with a touch of whimsy and offer a novel perspective on the seemingly unrelated domains of sports and energy consumption. So, put on your academia-jersey, and let's kick off this investigation with a goal-scoring and gas-sensing twist!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
Picture this: a soccer ball soaring through the air, a goalkeeper leaping desperately to make the save, and a group of researchers scratching their heads, pondering the seemingly absurd question – could the number of goals scored in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final actually have an impact on the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Montenegro? Yes, dear readers, we find ourselves delving into the perplexing world of sports and energy, where the improbable becomes the intriguing and the unimaginable becomes the undeniable.
As we embark on this academic endeavor, we are compelled to ask: what could possibly be the connection between the exhilarating goals on the pitch and the humble gas consumption in Montenegro? It's like trying to find the link between a penalty shootout and a barbecue – unexpected, curious, and oddly captivating. But fear not, dear readers, for we are here not only to unravel this enigmatic association but also to infuse a bit of merriment and whimsy into the typically solemn terrain of academic research.
The field of sports and energy may seem like an odd pairing, much like a soccer player wearing cleats to a formal soirée, but our aim is to challenge convention and galvanize scholarly discourse with a fresh perspective. With a dash of levity and a sprinkle of statistical rigor, our research endeavors to bridge the gap between the thrill of athletic competition and the practicalities of energy consumption. So, let's kick off this investigation with a goal-scoring and gas-sensing twist, shall we? Lace up your scholarly boots, dear readers, and get ready to score one for the curious minds!

[[RESULTS]]
Upon analyzing the data collected from the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final scores and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Montenegro, we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.6564342, indicating a relatively strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. This finding suggests that as the number of goals scored by the winning team in the championship final increases, there is a tendency for LPG consumption in Montenegro to also rise. It's like witnessing an uptick in soccer excitement leading to a surge in gas usage – a goal-scoring spectacle stimulating the gas meters, if you will.
Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.4309059 indicates that approximately 43% of the variability in LPG consumption in Montenegro can be explained by the number of goals scored in the championship final. This statistically significant association left us pleasantly surprised, akin to a last-minute goal that turns the game on its head.
The p-value of less than 0.01 reinforces the robustness of our findings, suggesting that the observed correlation is not a mere fluke but a meaningful pattern. It's as if the soccer field and the gas stations have been secretly communicating, orchestrating an unforeseen dance of numbers and outcomes.
To visually illustrate this captivating relationship, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot that showcases the striking correlation between the number of goals scored in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and LPG consumption in Montenegro. This figure serves as a testament to the unexpected but unmistakable connection between these two seemingly unrelated domains, offering a visual feast for the analytical souls and a splash of humor for the academically inclined.
In conclusion, our results highlight a surprising relationship between the thrill of soccer victories and the utilitarian reality of gas usage in Montenegro. It's as if the cheers of the fans on the pitch echo through the streets, inspiring a surge in gas-fueled activities. This unanticipated correlation encourages further exploration of the interplay between sports outcomes and energy consumption, injecting a dash of amusement into the typically serious discussions of academia. So, as we wrap up this section, let's raise a scholarly toast to the unexpected connections and embrace the whimsy of statistical analyses.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, we have unearthed a connection more striking than a midfielder's perfectly executed bicycle kick. The correlation between the number of goals scored in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and LPG consumption in Montenegro is as puzzling as a defender suddenly dribbling like a forward. Our findings dance like a well-coordinated offensive unit, showcasing a surprising relationship that even the most seasoned soccer fans and energy analysts would find astonishing. It’s like witnessing a hat-trick of statistical significance.

Our statistical analysis has painted a picture more colorful than a fan's face-painted tribute to their favorite team. The correlation coefficient of 0.6564342 and the r-squared value of 0.4309059 highlight a relationship so captivating that even the most stoic statisticians would crack a smile. The p-value of less than 0.01 serves as a delightful exclamation point to our discovery – it's as if the data itself wants to high-five us for unearthing such an unexpected pattern.

To put it simply, the number of goals scored in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final seems to have a tangible impact on LPG consumption in Montenegro. It's a bit like a game-winning goal leading to a surge in gas-powered celebrations across the country. Our results inspire the imagination and encourage further exploration into the unlikely but undeniably delightful intersection of sports outcomes and energy usage.

As we savor the revelation that sports excitement appears to have a palpable influence on gas consumption, we can confidently assert that no more research is needed in this area. Our findings stand as a testament to the joys of scholarly exploration and the unexpected discoveries that await us when we combine the seemingly unrelated realms of sports and energy. So, let's raise our metaphorical foam fingers and celebrate this unlikely but delightful goal-scoring and gas-fueling connection!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Goalie's Gas: Exploring the Relationship Between NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final Scores and LPG Consumption in Montenegro. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sports Science and Social Sciences


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Goalie's Gas: Exploring the Relationship Between NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final Scores and LPG Consumption in Montenegro. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Transnational Liquefied Petroleum Gas Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Goalie's Gas: Exploring the Relationship Between NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final Scores and LPG Consumption in Montenegro with an abstract of In this paper, we investigate the curious connection between the number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Montenegro. Utilizing data from the NCAA and Energy Information Administration, we sought to shed light on this seemingly improbable link. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.6564342 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the period spanning from 2006 to 2021. Our research challenges conventional wisdom and encourages a fresh perspective on the potential interplay between sports outcomes and energy usage. Through a lighthearted yet rigorous analysis, we aim to infuse scholarly discourse with a touch of whimsy and offer a novel perspective on the seemingly unrelated domains of sports and energy consumption. So, put on your academia-jersey, and let's kick off this investigation with a goal-scoring and gas-sensing twist!

ChatGPT:

NCAA Soccer Div II Championship, final scores, LPG consumption, Montenegro, correlation coefficient, Energy Information Administration, sports outcomes, energy usage, sports and energy consumption, NCAA data, scholarly discourse, goal scoring, gas sensing twist

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final
Source: NCAA
See what else correlates with Number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final

Liquefied petroleum gas used in Montenegro
Detailed data title: Volume of liquefied petroleum gas used consumed in Montenegro in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Liquefied petroleum gas used in Montenegro

Correlation r = 0.6564342 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.4309059 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 43.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Liquefied petroleum gas used in Montenegro) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final) over the 16 years from 2006 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0057. 0.0057455503065658520000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.66 in 0.57% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 174 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.24, 0.87 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final (Goals scored)1131311114221201
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Montenegro (Million Barrels/Day)0.5084930.5720550.6972680.5720550.5720550.6038360.5387980.4449320.508493110.5720550.5720550.5720550.5402740.540274




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1,1,3,1,3,1,1,1,1,4,2,2,1,2,0,1,])
array_2 = np.array([0.508493,0.572055,0.697268,0.572055,0.572055,0.603836,0.538798,0.444932,0.508493,1,1,0.572055,0.572055,0.572055,0.540274,0.540274,])
array_1_name = "Number of goals scored by the winning team in the NCAA Soccer Div II Championship Final"
array_2_name = "Liquefied petroleum gas used in Montenegro"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is pure awesomeness!


Correlation ID: 3065 · Black Variable ID: 132 · Red Variable ID: 24707
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0