about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #3,021 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Noelle and the second variable is Wind power generated in Tunisia.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

More babies were named Noelle, leading to a surge in baby mobile sales. This increased the demand for lightweight materials, prompting Tunisian manufacturers to invest in wind turbine technology. As the babies cooed and gurgled, they inadvertently created a mini-wind tunnel effect, boosting the power output in Tunisia. It's a breezy chain reaction sparked by the rising popularity of the name Noelle!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that depicts a serene low poly coastal landscape in Tunisia, with rows of towering wind turbines gracefully spinning in the breeze. At the heart of the scene, a sign marking "Noelle Wind Power Station" stands tall, emphasizing the role of the name "Noelle" in promoting renewable energy. The sky is aglow with the radiant name "Noelle," symbolizing its increasing popularity and association with sustainability. The overall image should have a minimalist low poly style, capturing the peaceful and impactful nature of the coastal wind power station. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Noelle and Wind power generated in Tunisia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Hyper-realistic Steampunk Low poly Cute 2D animation Woodblock painting
ChatGPT: Low poly

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Noelle and Wind power generated in Tunisia, in the following situation: As Noelle's popularity soared, so did the demand for her "power." This led to an increase in wind energy production in Tunisia, as Noelle's name became synonymous with energy and gust-ice. The winds of change blew in her favor, harnessing Noelle's charismatic allure into a renewable energy source!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A serene coastal landscape in Tunisia is dominated by rows of towering wind turbines, their blades spinning gracefully in the breeze. At the center of this picturesque scene stands a sign that reads "Noelle Wind Power Station," indicating the significant role of Noelle's name in driving the popularity and success of the renewable energy source. Meanwhile, the name "Noelle" shines brightly in the sky, symbolizing its increasing popularity and association with renewable energy.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Low poly ] and depicting this scene: A serene coastal landscape in Tunisia is dominated by rows of towering wind turbines, their blades spinning gracefully in the breeze. At the center of this picturesque scene stands a sign that reads "Noelle Wind Power Station," indicating the significant role of Noelle's name in driving the popularity and success of the renewable energy source. Meanwhile, the name "Noelle" shines brightly in the sky, symbolizing its increasing popularity and association with renewable energy. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that depicts a serene low poly coastal landscape in Tunisia, with rows of towering wind turbines gracefully spinning in the breeze. At the heart of the scene, a sign marking "Noelle Wind Power Station" stands tall, emphasizing the role of the name "Noelle" in promoting renewable energy. The sky is aglow with the radiant name "Noelle," symbolizing its increasing popularity and association with sustainability. The overall image should have a minimalist low poly style, capturing the peaceful and impactful nature of the coastal wind power station.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Noelle caused Wind power generated in Tunisia to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Blown Away: The Noelle Name Game and Wind Power in Tunisia

The Journal of Renewable Energy Innovation and Exploration

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Noelle and Wind power generated in Tunisia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9819080 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Blown Away: The Noelle Name Game and Wind Power in Tunisia

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study scrutinizes the curious and unsuspected relationship between the popularity of the first name Noelle and the generation of wind power in the North African country of Tunisia. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this unconventional investigation to unravel a potential link between the prevalence of Noelle and the wind power output in Tunisia. Through meticulous analysis, we unearthed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9819080, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, during the years 2000 to 2021. The findings not only demonstrate an intriguing association but also blow some fresh wind into the sails of statistical research. While causation remains elusive, the Noelle boom and winds of change in Tunisia present an enigmatic phenomenon worthy of further exploration and perhaps a breezy conversation starter at academic gatherings.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Noelle and Wind power generated in Tunisia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blown Away: The Noelle Name Game and Wind Power in Tunisia

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study scrutinizes the curious and unsuspected relationship between the popularity of the first name Noelle and the generation of wind power in the North African country of Tunisia. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this unconventional investigation to unravel a potential link between the prevalence of Noelle and the wind power output in Tunisia. Through meticulous analysis, we unearthed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9819080, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, during the years 2000 to 2021. The findings not only demonstrate an intriguing association but also blow some fresh wind into the sails of statistical research. While causation remains elusive, the Noelle boom and winds of change in Tunisia present an enigmatic phenomenon worthy of further exploration and perhaps a breezy conversation starter at academic gatherings.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of names and energy sources has been a relatively unexplored territory in the realm of statistical analysis. While previous studies have delved into the socio-economic and cultural implications of given names, the correlation with renewable energy production has remained conspicuously absent from scholarly investigation. In this paper, we unveil the unexpected correlation between the prevalence of the first name Noelle and the wind power generation in Tunisia, thus introducing a fresh breeze of insight into the world of statistical anomalies.

The choice of the name Noelle as the focal point of our study can be deemed both fortuitous and deliberate. The name itself connotes a sense of joy and festivity, often associated with the holiday season, creating an abstract link to the unseen forces of nature. The paradox of investigating a name synonymous with winter festivities and its connection to wind power in a North African nation is a testament to the capricious nature of statistical analysis.

Our quest for truth steered us towards the troves of data provided by the US Social Security Administration, a veritable treasure trove of names and their cultural prevalence over the years. Simultaneously, our gaze was directed towards the Energy Information Administration's records of wind power generation in Tunisia - a juxtaposition of human nomenclature and elemental forces.

The initial skepticism towards the plausibility of a relationship between a mere name and the generation of wind energy gave way to a systematic analysis that unfurled a surprisingly high correlation coefficient. The correlation coefficient of 0.9819080 emanated like a gust of wind, leaving us in a state of jejune disbelief. The accompanying p-value, shrouded in statistical significance, beckoned the invocation of further exploration and scrutiny. The empirical evidence we have uncovered not only challenges conventional wisdom but also beckons us to acknowledge the enigmatic and often capricious nature of statistical trends.

While our findings offer a gust of fresh insight into the serene world of statistical correlation, the causational undercurrents evade our grasp, akin to the elusive zephyr. The amalgamation of the Noelle boom and the winds of change in Tunisia presents a conundrum not easily dismissed, nudging us towards a deeper understanding of the unseen forces governing human nomenclature and renewable energy.

As we delve deeper into the confluence of names and elemental phenomena, we invite the academic community to embark on this breezy journey of exploration. Our findings not only demand our scholarly attention but also serve as a testament to the whimsical nature of statistical association. The ensuing sections of this paper will elucidate our methodology, present our findings in detail, and invite further discussion on this curiously breezy intersection of human nomenclature and renewable energy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Noelle and Wind power generated in Tunisia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blown Away: The Noelle Name Game and Wind Power in Tunisia

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study scrutinizes the curious and unsuspected relationship between the popularity of the first name Noelle and the generation of wind power in the North African country of Tunisia. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this unconventional investigation to unravel a potential link between the prevalence of Noelle and the wind power output in Tunisia. Through meticulous analysis, we unearthed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9819080, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, during the years 2000 to 2021. The findings not only demonstrate an intriguing association but also blow some fresh wind into the sails of statistical research. While causation remains elusive, the Noelle boom and winds of change in Tunisia present an enigmatic phenomenon worthy of further exploration and perhaps a breezy conversation starter at academic gatherings.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of names and energy sources has been a relatively unexplored territory in the realm of statistical analysis. While previous studies have delved into the socio-economic and cultural implications of given names, the correlation with renewable energy production has remained conspicuously absent from scholarly investigation. In this paper, we unveil the unexpected correlation between the prevalence of the first name Noelle and the wind power generation in Tunisia, thus introducing a fresh breeze of insight into the world of statistical anomalies.
The choice of the name Noelle as the focal point of our study can be deemed both fortuitous and deliberate. The name itself connotes a sense of joy and festivity, often associated with the holiday season, creating an abstract link to the unseen forces of nature. The paradox of investigating a name synonymous with winter festivities and its connection to wind power in a North African nation is a testament to the capricious nature of statistical analysis.
Our quest for truth steered us towards the troves of data provided by the US Social Security Administration, a veritable treasure trove of names and their cultural prevalence over the years. Simultaneously, our gaze was directed towards the Energy Information Administration's records of wind power generation in Tunisia - a juxtaposition of human nomenclature and elemental forces.
The initial skepticism towards the plausibility of a relationship between a mere name and the generation of wind energy gave way to a systematic analysis that unfurled a surprisingly high correlation coefficient. The correlation coefficient of 0.9819080 emanated like a gust of wind, leaving us in a state of jejune disbelief. The accompanying p-value, shrouded in statistical significance, beckoned the invocation of further exploration and scrutiny. The empirical evidence we have uncovered not only challenges conventional wisdom but also beckons us to acknowledge the enigmatic and often capricious nature of statistical trends.
While our findings offer a gust of fresh insight into the serene world of statistical correlation, the causational undercurrents evade our grasp, akin to the elusive zephyr. The amalgamation of the Noelle boom and the winds of change in Tunisia presents a conundrum not easily dismissed, nudging us towards a deeper understanding of the unseen forces governing human nomenclature and renewable energy.
As we delve deeper into the confluence of names and elemental phenomena, we invite the academic community to embark on this breezy journey of exploration. Our findings not only demand our scholarly attention but also serve as a testament to the whimsical nature of statistical association. The ensuing sections of this paper will elucidate our methodology, present our findings in detail, and invite further discussion on this curiously breezy intersection of human nomenclature and renewable energy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The interplay of consumer behavior and renewable energy has been a subject of growing interest in recent years, with scholars delving into the intricate dynamics of societal choices and environmental impact. Smith et al. (2015) examined the influence of naming trends on consumer preferences for eco-friendly products, uncovering intriguing parallels between market trends and nomenclature fluctuations. Conversely, Doe and Jones (2018) focused on the geographical influences on renewable energy usage, exploring the impact of cultural norms and naming conventions on the adoption of sustainable energy sources in diverse regions.

Expanding beyond the conventional boundaries of scholarly inquiry, our investigation introduces an unprecedented juxtaposition of the Noelle name game and wind power generation in Tunisia. While traditional studies have largely overlooked the potential correlation between individual names and environmental phenomena, our research endeavors to shed light on this unexplored terrain.

In "The Societal Impact of Naming Trends" by Mitchell and Webb (2012), the authors delve into the societal implications of popular names, highlighting the cyclical nature of naming conventions and their interplay with cultural dynamics. This work serves as a poignant reminder of the fluid nature of nomenclature trends, setting the stage for our investigation into the ramifications of the widespread adoption of the name Noelle on renewable energy patterns in Tunisia.

In contrast to the substantial corpus of non-fiction literature, a foray into fictional works yields unexpected insights into the resonance of names with environmental elements. In "Gone with the Wind" by Margaret Mitchell and "Wind/Pinball" by Haruki Murakami, the authors tangentially explore the enigmatic interplay of wind and human experiences, offering nuanced perspectives on the ethereal connection between natural forces and human nomenclature. While the primary focus of these works deviates from our empirical investigation, the subtle allusions to wind as a pervasive force of change and the potential influence of nomenclature on elemental phenomena present thought-provoking parallels to our study.

Beyond the realm of scholarly publications and literary works, internet memes have emerged as an unexpected conduit for popular discourse on wind power and nomenclature. The ubiquitous "Invisible Bicycle" meme, characterized by whimsical images of individuals pedaling in a stationary position, offers a lighthearted depiction of invisible forces at play – a whimsical parallel to the unseen influence of the Noelle name game on wind power generation. The resonance of such memes with contemporary cultural dialogue underscores the relevance of our investigation in unraveling the cryptic relationship between names and renewable energy.

As we navigate through the windswept landscape of academic inquiry, our lighthearted dalliance with the curious correlation between the first name Noelle and wind power in Tunisia beckons a nuanced exploration of statistical anomalies and the capricious nature of scholarly pursuits. This hitherto uncharted domain of nomenclature and environmental forces portends a blustery journey into the whimsical world of statistical associations, offering a refreshing gust of insight into the enigmatic interplay of human naming conventions and renewable energy dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Noelle and Wind power generated in Tunisia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2000 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blown Away: The Noelle Name Game and Wind Power in Tunisia

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study scrutinizes the curious and unsuspected relationship between the popularity of the first name Noelle and the generation of wind power in the North African country of Tunisia. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this unconventional investigation to unravel a potential link between the prevalence of Noelle and the wind power output in Tunisia. Through meticulous analysis, we unearthed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9819080, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, during the years 2000 to 2021. The findings not only demonstrate an intriguing association but also blow some fresh wind into the sails of statistical research. While causation remains elusive, the Noelle boom and winds of change in Tunisia present an enigmatic phenomenon worthy of further exploration and perhaps a breezy conversation starter at academic gatherings.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of names and energy sources has been a relatively unexplored territory in the realm of statistical analysis. While previous studies have delved into the socio-economic and cultural implications of given names, the correlation with renewable energy production has remained conspicuously absent from scholarly investigation. In this paper, we unveil the unexpected correlation between the prevalence of the first name Noelle and the wind power generation in Tunisia, thus introducing a fresh breeze of insight into the world of statistical anomalies.
The choice of the name Noelle as the focal point of our study can be deemed both fortuitous and deliberate. The name itself connotes a sense of joy and festivity, often associated with the holiday season, creating an abstract link to the unseen forces of nature. The paradox of investigating a name synonymous with winter festivities and its connection to wind power in a North African nation is a testament to the capricious nature of statistical analysis.
Our quest for truth steered us towards the troves of data provided by the US Social Security Administration, a veritable treasure trove of names and their cultural prevalence over the years. Simultaneously, our gaze was directed towards the Energy Information Administration's records of wind power generation in Tunisia - a juxtaposition of human nomenclature and elemental forces.
The initial skepticism towards the plausibility of a relationship between a mere name and the generation of wind energy gave way to a systematic analysis that unfurled a surprisingly high correlation coefficient. The correlation coefficient of 0.9819080 emanated like a gust of wind, leaving us in a state of jejune disbelief. The accompanying p-value, shrouded in statistical significance, beckoned the invocation of further exploration and scrutiny. The empirical evidence we have uncovered not only challenges conventional wisdom but also beckons us to acknowledge the enigmatic and often capricious nature of statistical trends.
While our findings offer a gust of fresh insight into the serene world of statistical correlation, the causational undercurrents evade our grasp, akin to the elusive zephyr. The amalgamation of the Noelle boom and the winds of change in Tunisia presents a conundrum not easily dismissed, nudging us towards a deeper understanding of the unseen forces governing human nomenclature and renewable energy.
As we delve deeper into the confluence of names and elemental phenomena, we invite the academic community to embark on this breezy journey of exploration. Our findings not only demand our scholarly attention but also serve as a testament to the whimsical nature of statistical association. The ensuing sections of this paper will elucidate our methodology, present our findings in detail, and invite further discussion on this curiously breezy intersection of human nomenclature and renewable energy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mysterious connection between the prevalence of the first name Noelle and the generation of wind power in Tunisia, our research team undertook a labyrinthine journey in the realm of data collection and analysis. The gales of curiosity propelled us to navigate the tumultuous seas of public records, seeking a treasure trove of information to unlock the enigmatic correlation at the core of our investigation.

The first gust of data was harnessed from the US Social Security Administration, a repository of nomenclatural trends that spans from the turn of the millennium to the present day. With the subtlety of a gentle breeze, we fanned through the archival records to extract the prevalence of the name Noelle across the years, encompassing the ebb and flow of its cultural prominence. The statistical zephyr thus conjured by this wealth of data created a lively whirlwind of possibilities, propelling us forth towards an esoteric voyage.

Simultaneously, we turned our gaze to the Energy Information Administration's tempestuous records of wind power generation in the coastal land of Tunisia. The winds of change in this North African nation beckoned to us, whispering secrets of renewable energy production through their convoluted statistical trail. As we hoisted the sails of analysis, we weathered the stormy sea of fluctuating wind power outputs, seeking to capture the elusive gusts of correlation that may lie beneath the surface.

With the harmonious synthesis of these divergent datasets, our team cast a wide net upon the tempestuous ocean of statistical analysis. Our bespoke methodology intertwined the whims of nomenclatural exploration with the turbulence of renewable energy statistics, striving to capture the ethereal zephyrs of correlation that elude the untrained eye.

While our journey was fraught with winds of skepticism, the empirical currents unexpectedly propelled us towards a discovery that bore the weight of statistical significance. The development of this curious correlation coefficient of 0.9819080 metamorphosed our search into a tempestuous odyssey, compelling us to navigate the uncharted waters of statistical intrigue.

Thus, our methodology, much like a capricious gust of wind, transcended mere scientific convention and embarked upon an unconventional pilgrimage through the serendipitous interplay of human nomenclature and elemental phenomena. The ensuing sections of this paper will unfurl the wind-tossed tapestry of our findings, inviting the scholarly community to join us in this whimsical exploration of statistical association.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Noelle and Wind power generated in Tunisia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2000 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9819080, r-squared of 0.9641433, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Blown Away: The Noelle Name Game and Wind Power in Tunisia

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study scrutinizes the curious and unsuspected relationship between the popularity of the first name Noelle and the generation of wind power in the North African country of Tunisia. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this unconventional investigation to unravel a potential link between the prevalence of Noelle and the wind power output in Tunisia. Through meticulous analysis, we unearthed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9819080, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, during the years 2000 to 2021. The findings not only demonstrate an intriguing association but also blow some fresh wind into the sails of statistical research. While causation remains elusive, the Noelle boom and winds of change in Tunisia present an enigmatic phenomenon worthy of further exploration and perhaps a breezy conversation starter at academic gatherings.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of names and energy sources has been a relatively unexplored territory in the realm of statistical analysis. While previous studies have delved into the socio-economic and cultural implications of given names, the correlation with renewable energy production has remained conspicuously absent from scholarly investigation. In this paper, we unveil the unexpected correlation between the prevalence of the first name Noelle and the wind power generation in Tunisia, thus introducing a fresh breeze of insight into the world of statistical anomalies.
The choice of the name Noelle as the focal point of our study can be deemed both fortuitous and deliberate. The name itself connotes a sense of joy and festivity, often associated with the holiday season, creating an abstract link to the unseen forces of nature. The paradox of investigating a name synonymous with winter festivities and its connection to wind power in a North African nation is a testament to the capricious nature of statistical analysis.
Our quest for truth steered us towards the troves of data provided by the US Social Security Administration, a veritable treasure trove of names and their cultural prevalence over the years. Simultaneously, our gaze was directed towards the Energy Information Administration's records of wind power generation in Tunisia - a juxtaposition of human nomenclature and elemental forces.
The initial skepticism towards the plausibility of a relationship between a mere name and the generation of wind energy gave way to a systematic analysis that unfurled a surprisingly high correlation coefficient. The correlation coefficient of 0.9819080 emanated like a gust of wind, leaving us in a state of jejune disbelief. The accompanying p-value, shrouded in statistical significance, beckoned the invocation of further exploration and scrutiny. The empirical evidence we have uncovered not only challenges conventional wisdom but also beckons us to acknowledge the enigmatic and often capricious nature of statistical trends.
While our findings offer a gust of fresh insight into the serene world of statistical correlation, the causational undercurrents evade our grasp, akin to the elusive zephyr. The amalgamation of the Noelle boom and the winds of change in Tunisia presents a conundrum not easily dismissed, nudging us towards a deeper understanding of the unseen forces governing human nomenclature and renewable energy.
As we delve deeper into the confluence of names and elemental phenomena, we invite the academic community to embark on this breezy journey of exploration. Our findings not only demand our scholarly attention but also serve as a testament to the whimsical nature of statistical association. The ensuing sections of this paper will elucidate our methodology, present our findings in detail, and invite further discussion on this curiously breezy intersection of human nomenclature and renewable energy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed an astonishingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9819080 between the popularity of the first name Noelle and wind power generated in Tunisia. This suggests a remarkably strong linear relationship between the prevalence of the name Noelle and the production of wind energy in the North African nation. The r-squared value of 0.9641433 further buttresses this correlation, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variability in wind power output in Tunisia can be explained by the prevalence of the name Noelle.

The statistical significance of our findings was reaffirmed by a p-value of less than 0.01. This indicates that the observed correlation between the popularity of the name Noelle and the generation of wind power in Tunisia is highly unlikely to have occurred by random chance alone. The results not only defy conventional expectations but also whirl us into the captivating vortex of statistical anomalies.

Figure 1 (to be included separately) illustrates the compelling relationship between the first name Noelle and wind power generated in Tunisia. The scatterplot graphically elucidates the strong positive correlation, akin to a gentle breeze that ruffles the surface of empirical research.

Our findings, while undoubtedly thought-provoking, beckon further exploration and scholarly scrutiny. The conundrum of the Noelle name game and wind power in Tunisia presents a windy path of inquiry that is both capriciously intriguing and statistically significant. The wind of statistical investigation has propelled us into uncharted territories, offering a breath of fresh air amid conventional research paradigms. These findings not only tickle the curiosity but also blow the winds of statistical analysis in unforeseen directions.

In sum, our investigation into the enigmatic relationship between the popularity of the first name Noelle and wind power generation in Tunisia has not only unearthed a remarkably high correlation but has also wafted fresh perspectives into the windswept realm of statistical associations. We invite our fellow scholars to catch this breeze and embark on a breezy voyage of debate and discovery, contemplating the winds of change in both human nomenclature and renewable energy production.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Noelle and Wind power generated in Tunisia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Blown Away: The Noelle Name Game and Wind Power in Tunisia

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study scrutinizes the curious and unsuspected relationship between the popularity of the first name Noelle and the generation of wind power in the North African country of Tunisia. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this unconventional investigation to unravel a potential link between the prevalence of Noelle and the wind power output in Tunisia. Through meticulous analysis, we unearthed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9819080, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, during the years 2000 to 2021. The findings not only demonstrate an intriguing association but also blow some fresh wind into the sails of statistical research. While causation remains elusive, the Noelle boom and winds of change in Tunisia present an enigmatic phenomenon worthy of further exploration and perhaps a breezy conversation starter at academic gatherings.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The interplay of consumer behavior and renewable energy has been a subject of growing interest in recent years, with scholars delving into the intricate dynamics of societal choices and environmental impact. Smith et al. (2015) examined the influence of naming trends on consumer preferences for eco-friendly products, uncovering intriguing parallels between market trends and nomenclature fluctuations. Conversely, Doe and Jones (2018) focused on the geographical influences on renewable energy usage, exploring the impact of cultural norms and naming conventions on the adoption of sustainable energy sources in diverse regions.
Expanding beyond the conventional boundaries of scholarly inquiry, our investigation introduces an unprecedented juxtaposition of the Noelle name game and wind power generation in Tunisia. While traditional studies have largely overlooked the potential correlation between individual names and environmental phenomena, our research endeavors to shed light on this unexplored terrain.
In "The Societal Impact of Naming Trends" by Mitchell and Webb (2012), the authors delve into the societal implications of popular names, highlighting the cyclical nature of naming conventions and their interplay with cultural dynamics. This work serves as a poignant reminder of the fluid nature of nomenclature trends, setting the stage for our investigation into the ramifications of the widespread adoption of the name Noelle on renewable energy patterns in Tunisia.
In contrast to the substantial corpus of non-fiction literature, a foray into fictional works yields unexpected insights into the resonance of names with environmental elements. In "Gone with the Wind" by Margaret Mitchell and "Wind/Pinball" by Haruki Murakami, the authors tangentially explore the enigmatic interplay of wind and human experiences, offering nuanced perspectives on the ethereal connection between natural forces and human nomenclature. While the primary focus of these works deviates from our empirical investigation, the subtle allusions to wind as a pervasive force of change and the potential influence of nomenclature on elemental phenomena present thought-provoking parallels to our study.
Beyond the realm of scholarly publications and literary works, internet memes have emerged as an unexpected conduit for popular discourse on wind power and nomenclature. The ubiquitous "Invisible Bicycle" meme, characterized by whimsical images of individuals pedaling in a stationary position, offers a lighthearted depiction of invisible forces at play – a whimsical parallel to the unseen influence of the Noelle name game on wind power generation. The resonance of such memes with contemporary cultural dialogue underscores the relevance of our investigation in unraveling the cryptic relationship between names and renewable energy.
As we navigate through the windswept landscape of academic inquiry, our lighthearted dalliance with the curious correlation between the first name Noelle and wind power in Tunisia beckons a nuanced exploration of statistical anomalies and the capricious nature of scholarly pursuits. This hitherto uncharted domain of nomenclature and environmental forces portends a blustery journey into the whimsical world of statistical associations, offering a refreshing gust of insight into the enigmatic interplay of human naming conventions and renewable energy dynamics.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed an astonishingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9819080 between the popularity of the first name Noelle and wind power generated in Tunisia. This suggests a remarkably strong linear relationship between the prevalence of the name Noelle and the production of wind energy in the North African nation. The r-squared value of 0.9641433 further buttresses this correlation, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variability in wind power output in Tunisia can be explained by the prevalence of the name Noelle.
The statistical significance of our findings was reaffirmed by a p-value of less than 0.01. This indicates that the observed correlation between the popularity of the name Noelle and the generation of wind power in Tunisia is highly unlikely to have occurred by random chance alone. The results not only defy conventional expectations but also whirl us into the captivating vortex of statistical anomalies.
Figure 1 (to be included separately) illustrates the compelling relationship between the first name Noelle and wind power generated in Tunisia. The scatterplot graphically elucidates the strong positive correlation, akin to a gentle breeze that ruffles the surface of empirical research.
Our findings, while undoubtedly thought-provoking, beckon further exploration and scholarly scrutiny. The conundrum of the Noelle name game and wind power in Tunisia presents a windy path of inquiry that is both capriciously intriguing and statistically significant. The wind of statistical investigation has propelled us into uncharted territories, offering a breath of fresh air amid conventional research paradigms. These findings not only tickle the curiosity but also blow the winds of statistical analysis in unforeseen directions.
In sum, our investigation into the enigmatic relationship between the popularity of the first name Noelle and wind power generation in Tunisia has not only unearthed a remarkably high correlation but has also wafted fresh perspectives into the windswept realm of statistical associations. We invite our fellow scholars to catch this breeze and embark on a breezy voyage of debate and discovery, contemplating the winds of change in both human nomenclature and renewable energy production.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The correlation between the popularity of the first name Noelle and wind power generation in Tunisia, as evidenced by our study, raises intriguing and zephyrous points for consideration. The blustery finding of a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9819080 validates the peculiar juxtaposition of nomenclature trends and renewable energy dynamics, furnishing robust support for prior research that highlighted the interplay of consumer behavior, cultural norms, and naming conventions in shaping environmental patterns. Our results not only corroborate the findings of Smith et al. (2015) on the influence of naming trends on consumer preferences for eco-friendly products but also serve as a windy testament to the geographical influences on renewable energy usage explored by Doe and Jones (2018).

Delving into the unexpected parallels between wind power generation and the Noelle name game, our investigation echoes the offbeat yet thought-provoking insights gleaned from Mitchell and Webb's (2012) analysis of societal naming trends. By taking an earnest and balmy approach to the potential influence of nomenclature on elemental phenomena, our study elevates the discourse on the societal impact of naming trends to a gusty level of statistical significance.

The statistical anomalies unveiled by our exploration beckon forth a lively dialogue on the whimsical nature of scholarly pursuits and statistical associations, galvanizing a blustery journey into uncharted territory for lighthearted dalliances with data. The windswept realm of statistical analysis, often characterized by the tempestuous nature of empirical correlations, has found a zephyrous beacon in the enigmatic relationship between Noelle and wind power in Tunisia. This finding not only ruffles the sails of conventional research paradigms but also invites fellow scholars to catch the breeze and embark on a spirited debate about the winds of change in both nomenclature and renewable energy production.

In contemplating the winds of change, both in human naming conventions and sustainable energy dynamics, our study provides a breath of fresh air amid the typically staid atmosphere of academic inquiry. The blustery findings of our investigation sail effortlessly across the scholarly ocean, offering a breezy conversation starter at academic gatherings and setting the stage for a spirited, albeit whimsical, exploration of the intricate interplay between names and environmental phenomena.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Noelle and Wind power generated in Tunisia. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Blown Away: The Noelle Name Game and Wind Power in Tunisia

[[ABSTRACT]]
The study scrutinizes the curious and unsuspected relationship between the popularity of the first name Noelle and the generation of wind power in the North African country of Tunisia. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this unconventional investigation to unravel a potential link between the prevalence of Noelle and the wind power output in Tunisia. Through meticulous analysis, we unearthed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9819080, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, during the years 2000 to 2021. The findings not only demonstrate an intriguing association but also blow some fresh wind into the sails of statistical research. While causation remains elusive, the Noelle boom and winds of change in Tunisia present an enigmatic phenomenon worthy of further exploration and perhaps a breezy conversation starter at academic gatherings.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of names and energy sources has been a relatively unexplored territory in the realm of statistical analysis. While previous studies have delved into the socio-economic and cultural implications of given names, the correlation with renewable energy production has remained conspicuously absent from scholarly investigation. In this paper, we unveil the unexpected correlation between the prevalence of the first name Noelle and the wind power generation in Tunisia, thus introducing a fresh breeze of insight into the world of statistical anomalies.
The choice of the name Noelle as the focal point of our study can be deemed both fortuitous and deliberate. The name itself connotes a sense of joy and festivity, often associated with the holiday season, creating an abstract link to the unseen forces of nature. The paradox of investigating a name synonymous with winter festivities and its connection to wind power in a North African nation is a testament to the capricious nature of statistical analysis.
Our quest for truth steered us towards the troves of data provided by the US Social Security Administration, a veritable treasure trove of names and their cultural prevalence over the years. Simultaneously, our gaze was directed towards the Energy Information Administration's records of wind power generation in Tunisia - a juxtaposition of human nomenclature and elemental forces.
The initial skepticism towards the plausibility of a relationship between a mere name and the generation of wind energy gave way to a systematic analysis that unfurled a surprisingly high correlation coefficient. The correlation coefficient of 0.9819080 emanated like a gust of wind, leaving us in a state of jejune disbelief. The accompanying p-value, shrouded in statistical significance, beckoned the invocation of further exploration and scrutiny. The empirical evidence we have uncovered not only challenges conventional wisdom but also beckons us to acknowledge the enigmatic and often capricious nature of statistical trends.
While our findings offer a gust of fresh insight into the serene world of statistical correlation, the causational undercurrents evade our grasp, akin to the elusive zephyr. The amalgamation of the Noelle boom and the winds of change in Tunisia presents a conundrum not easily dismissed, nudging us towards a deeper understanding of the unseen forces governing human nomenclature and renewable energy.
As we delve deeper into the confluence of names and elemental phenomena, we invite the academic community to embark on this breezy journey of exploration. Our findings not only demand our scholarly attention but also serve as a testament to the whimsical nature of statistical association. The ensuing sections of this paper will elucidate our methodology, present our findings in detail, and invite further discussion on this curiously breezy intersection of human nomenclature and renewable energy.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed an astonishingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9819080 between the popularity of the first name Noelle and wind power generated in Tunisia. This suggests a remarkably strong linear relationship between the prevalence of the name Noelle and the production of wind energy in the North African nation. The r-squared value of 0.9641433 further buttresses this correlation, indicating that a substantial proportion of the variability in wind power output in Tunisia can be explained by the prevalence of the name Noelle.
The statistical significance of our findings was reaffirmed by a p-value of less than 0.01. This indicates that the observed correlation between the popularity of the name Noelle and the generation of wind power in Tunisia is highly unlikely to have occurred by random chance alone. The results not only defy conventional expectations but also whirl us into the captivating vortex of statistical anomalies.
Figure 1 (to be included separately) illustrates the compelling relationship between the first name Noelle and wind power generated in Tunisia. The scatterplot graphically elucidates the strong positive correlation, akin to a gentle breeze that ruffles the surface of empirical research.
Our findings, while undoubtedly thought-provoking, beckon further exploration and scholarly scrutiny. The conundrum of the Noelle name game and wind power in Tunisia presents a windy path of inquiry that is both capriciously intriguing and statistically significant. The wind of statistical investigation has propelled us into uncharted territories, offering a breath of fresh air amid conventional research paradigms. These findings not only tickle the curiosity but also blow the winds of statistical analysis in unforeseen directions.
In sum, our investigation into the enigmatic relationship between the popularity of the first name Noelle and wind power generation in Tunisia has not only unearthed a remarkably high correlation but has also wafted fresh perspectives into the windswept realm of statistical associations. We invite our fellow scholars to catch this breeze and embark on a breezy voyage of debate and discovery, contemplating the winds of change in both human nomenclature and renewable energy production.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has weathered the storm and shed light on the gusty relationship between the popularity of the name Noelle and wind power generation in Tunisia. The wind of statistical analysis has blown us away with a correlation coefficient of 0.9819080, leaving us swept up in a whirlwind of statistical anomalies. The statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 has jolted us with the realization that this connection is no mere zephyr of chance.

Our findings not only uplift the sails of statistical research but also nudge us to acknowledge the windfall of uncharted territories in the realm of nomenclature and renewable energy. As the winds of statistical analysis continue to shift, it seems that no more research is needed in this area - we've already blown this research topic wide open!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Blown Away: The Noelle Name Game and Wind Power in Tunisia. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Renewable Energy Innovation and Exploration


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Blown Away: The Noelle Name Game and Wind Power in Tunisia. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Lighthearted Science Foundation


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Blown Away: The Noelle Name Game and Wind Power in Tunisia with an abstract of The study scrutinizes the curious and unsuspected relationship between the popularity of the first name Noelle and the generation of wind power in the North African country of Tunisia. Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, our research team embarked on this unconventional investigation to unravel a potential link between the prevalence of Noelle and the wind power output in Tunisia. Through meticulous analysis, we unearthed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9819080, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, during the years 2000 to 2021. The findings not only demonstrate an intriguing association but also blow some fresh wind into the sails of statistical research. While causation remains elusive, the Noelle boom and winds of change in Tunisia present an enigmatic phenomenon worthy of further exploration and perhaps a breezy conversation starter at academic gatherings.

ChatGPT:

Noelle name popularity, wind power, Tunisia, correlation coefficient, statistical significance, Social Security Administration data, Energy Information Administration data, North African country, generation of wind power, Noelle boom, causation analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Noelle
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Noelle
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Noelle

Wind power generated in Tunisia
Detailed data title: Total wind power generated in Tunisia in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Wind power generated in Tunisia

Correlation r = 0.9819080 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9641433 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 96.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Wind power generated in Tunisia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Noelle) over the 22 years from 2000 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.3E-16. 0.0000000000000006293685178196
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 6.3E-14% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,588,894,219,660,724 random variables You don't actually need 1 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 21 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 21 because we have two variables measured over a period of 22 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.96, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Noelle (Babies born)7106397277556866537006497247428769041035108113021292127713551388140213821480
Wind power generated in Tunisia (Billion kWh)0.0230.0240.030.0330.0440.0420.0380.0430.0390.0970.1390.1090.1960.3580.5070.4480.4740.4490.4530.50.4650.528583




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([710,639,727,755,686,653,700,649,724,742,876,904,1035,1081,1302,1292,1277,1355,1388,1402,1382,1480,])
array_2 = np.array([0.023,0.024,0.03,0.033,0.044,0.042,0.038,0.043,0.039,0.097,0.139,0.109,0.196,0.358,0.507,0.448,0.474,0.449,0.453,0.5,0.465,0.528583,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Noelle"
array_2_name = "Wind power generated in Tunisia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 3021 · Black Variable ID: 2756 · Red Variable ID: 24043
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0