about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,996 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Dayton and the second variable is The number of genetic counselors in Ohio.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As air quality improved in Dayton, the local population found themselves with a new lease on life. With the prevalent smog no longer stifling their senses, they were able to see things more clearly - including the fact that they didn't need as much genetic counseling as they thought. The cleaner air led to cleaner genetic outcomes, leaving fewer Ohioans in need of professional genetic guidance. In essence, as the pollution dissipated, so did the perceived need for genetic counselors in the state. It's a case of environmental wellness inadvertently leading to a reduction in genetic wellness professionals.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Concept art ] Generate an image showing a serene park in Dayton, Ohio, with lush greenery and picturesque pathways. Capture the clear sky and people engaging in various outdoor activities, such as cycling, walking, or having a picnic, all without wearing masks. Meanwhile, depict a calm office setting in Ohio, with genetic counselors having a relaxed conversation, perhaps surrounded by genetic charts or medical books, reflecting the decreased demand for their services in the state. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Dayton and The number of genetic counselors in Ohio. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Sci-fi fantacy Low poly inspired by bauhaus a meme Concept art
ChatGPT: Concept art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Dayton and The number of genetic counselors in Ohio, in the following situation: Because with less air pollution in Dayton, people no longer needed genetic counseling for their "air genes" and the demand for genetic counselors in Ohio subsequently decreased.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In an airy park in Dayton, Ohio, the lack of smog and clean air is evident as the sky is clear and people can be seen enjoying the outdoors without masks. Meanwhile, in a quiet office building in Ohio, a few genetic counselors are seen having a relaxed conversation, reflecting the decreased demand for their services in the state.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Concept art ] and depicting this scene: In an airy park in Dayton, Ohio, the lack of smog and clean air is evident as the sky is clear and people can be seen enjoying the outdoors without masks. Meanwhile, in a quiet office building in Ohio, a few genetic counselors are seen having a relaxed conversation, reflecting the decreased demand for their services in the state. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Concept art ] Generate an image showing a serene park in Dayton, Ohio, with lush greenery and picturesque pathways. Capture the clear sky and people engaging in various outdoor activities, such as cycling, walking, or having a picnic, all without wearing masks. Meanwhile, depict a calm office setting in Ohio, with genetic counselors having a relaxed conversation, perhaps surrounded by genetic charts or medical books, reflecting the decreased demand for their services in the state.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Dayton caused The number of genetic counselors in Ohio to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Air We Grow: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Genetic Counselor Population in Ohio

Journal of Genetic Environmental Epidemiology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dayton and The number of genetic counselors in Ohio. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9264197 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Air We Grow: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Genetic Counselor Population in Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the convoluted web of connections between air pollution in Dayton and the number of genetic counselors in Ohio. Employing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we scrutinize the correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9264197 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2022, suggesting that the presence of air pollution may be influencing the genetic counselor population in the state. The study sheds light on the unexpected interconnectedness of environmental factors and healthcare professions, ultimately prompting a reevaluation of the environmental determinants of human resources in the field of genetics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dayton and The number of genetic counselors in Ohio. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Air We Grow: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Genetic Counselor Population in Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the convoluted web of connections between air pollution in Dayton and the number of genetic counselors in Ohio. Employing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we scrutinize the correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9264197 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2022, suggesting that the presence of air pollution may be influencing the genetic counselor population in the state. The study sheds light on the unexpected interconnectedness of environmental factors and healthcare professions, ultimately prompting a reevaluation of the environmental determinants of human resources in the field of genetics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
**[[INTRODUCTION]]**

In the realm of research, we often uncover unexpected relationships and connections that leave us scratching our heads in bewilderment or merely gasping for fresh air. And in this particular study, we have ventured into the expansive field of environmental and healthcare dynamics to explore the unique correlation between air pollution in Dayton and the genetic counselor population in Ohio. As we embark on this scientific adventure, we cannot help but acknowledge the "air" of mystery that surrounds these seemingly disparate variables.

Throughout history, the pursuit of knowledge has often led researchers down proverbial rabbit holes, and we find ourselves similarly tumbling into the enigmatic world of air quality and genetic counseling. The prevailing wisdom may assure us that these domains do not typically intersect, but such assumptions must be taken with a grain of salt – preferably iodized, for scientific rigor.

Before we dive headfirst into the dataset, let us take a moment to consider the comical chaos that ensues when we attempt to untangle the web of relationships in the world of scientific inquiry. It is akin to a plot twist in a science fiction movie – an unexpected turn of events that leaves us gripping our calculators in suspense, pondering the seemingly inexplicable connections between the pollutants swirling through the air in Dayton and the number of genetic counselors dotting the landscape of Ohio. It is almost as if the data itself is playing a mischievous game of hide-and-seek, daring us to uncover its clandestine secrets.

The essence of statistical analysis is often like a comedic ballet, with the data pirouetting and leapfrogging across scatterplots and regression models, leaving us frantically scribbling notes and muttering incantations to our trusty software programs. As researchers, we must not shy away from acknowledging the whimsical nature of our endeavors, embracing the unexpected twists and turns that add spice to our scientific pursuits.

So, grab your lab coat, dust off your graphing calculator, and join us as we embark on this riveting journey to unravel the curious relationship between air pollution and genetic counseling, where the statistical results may just astound you more than a magician's sleight of hand.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dayton and The number of genetic counselors in Ohio. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Air We Grow: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Genetic Counselor Population in Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the convoluted web of connections between air pollution in Dayton and the number of genetic counselors in Ohio. Employing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we scrutinize the correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9264197 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2022, suggesting that the presence of air pollution may be influencing the genetic counselor population in the state. The study sheds light on the unexpected interconnectedness of environmental factors and healthcare professions, ultimately prompting a reevaluation of the environmental determinants of human resources in the field of genetics.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of research, we often uncover unexpected relationships and connections that leave us scratching our heads in bewilderment or merely gasping for fresh air. And in this particular study, we have ventured into the expansive field of environmental and healthcare dynamics to explore the unique correlation between air pollution in Dayton and the genetic counselor population in Ohio. As we embark on this scientific adventure, we cannot help but acknowledge the "air" of mystery that surrounds these seemingly disparate variables.
Throughout history, the pursuit of knowledge has often led researchers down proverbial rabbit holes, and we find ourselves similarly tumbling into the enigmatic world of air quality and genetic counseling. The prevailing wisdom may assure us that these domains do not typically intersect, but such assumptions must be taken with a grain of salt – preferably iodized, for scientific rigor.
Before we dive headfirst into the dataset, let us take a moment to consider the comical chaos that ensues when we attempt to untangle the web of relationships in the world of scientific inquiry. It is akin to a plot twist in a science fiction movie – an unexpected turn of events that leaves us gripping our calculators in suspense, pondering the seemingly inexplicable connections between the pollutants swirling through the air in Dayton and the number of genetic counselors dotting the landscape of Ohio. It is almost as if the data itself is playing a mischievous game of hide-and-seek, daring us to uncover its clandestine secrets.
The essence of statistical analysis is often like a comedic ballet, with the data pirouetting and leapfrogging across scatterplots and regression models, leaving us frantically scribbling notes and muttering incantations to our trusty software programs. As researchers, we must not shy away from acknowledging the whimsical nature of our endeavors, embracing the unexpected twists and turns that add spice to our scientific pursuits.
So, grab your lab coat, dust off your graphing calculator, and join us as we embark on this riveting journey to unravel the curious relationship between air pollution and genetic counseling, where the statistical results may just astound you more than a magician's sleight of hand.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In the pursuit of understanding the intricate connection between air pollution in Dayton and the genetic counselor population in Ohio, a plethora of studies have attempted to shed light on this perplexing relationship. Smith et al. (2015) emphasized the impact of environmental factors on healthcare professions, laying the groundwork for our investigation into this uncharted territory. Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the effects of air quality on human resources in the healthcare sector, prompting us to contemplate the poetically bewildering dance between pollutants and genetic counselors.

Turning the pages to non-fiction works related to air quality and healthcare, the Environmental Protection Agency's "State of the Air" report serves as a foundational source of information, unveiling the atmospheric drama that unfolds in Dayton and its potential repercussions on public health. Similarly, "Genetics and You: A Practical Guide" by Dr. Bio Lore provides a comprehensive examination of the genetic counseling landscape, offering invaluable insights that tantalize and mystify researchers much like a riveting whodunit novel.

In the realm of fiction, J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Genes" might not directly address our research question, but it certainly casts a spell of intrigue and curiosity over the unexplored connections between environmental influences and genetic destiny. Meanwhile, Margaret Atwood's "Ozone Swoon" weaves a dystopian narrative of a world engulfed in air pollution, prompting readers to ponder the real-life implications of our investigation in a manner that is as thought-provoking as it is alarmingly wacky.

Expanding our scope to the cinematic world, "The Air Quality and the Furious" offers a thrilling portrayal of air pollution's potential impact on the dynamics of genetic counseling – a high-octane exploration that leaves audiences breathless, both from the adrenaline and the implications of our research. Additionally, "The Good, the Bad, and the Smoggy" presents a lighthearted yet surprisingly poignant reflection on the interplay between air pollution and human health, reminding us that even the most unlikely pairings can yield riveting insights.

As we sift through this eclectic array of literature, we are reminded of the delightful absurdity that often accompanies scientific pursuits, where the line between serious inquiry and whimsical exploration blurs like a pointillist painting viewed through fogged-up glasses. With each turn of the page, we are propelled further into an intellectual romp that leaves us simultaneously scratching our heads and clutching our sides with laughter, adding an element of delightful eccentricity to our scholarly endeavors.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dayton and The number of genetic counselors in Ohio. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2012 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Air We Grow: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Genetic Counselor Population in Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the convoluted web of connections between air pollution in Dayton and the number of genetic counselors in Ohio. Employing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we scrutinize the correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9264197 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2022, suggesting that the presence of air pollution may be influencing the genetic counselor population in the state. The study sheds light on the unexpected interconnectedness of environmental factors and healthcare professions, ultimately prompting a reevaluation of the environmental determinants of human resources in the field of genetics.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the realm of research, we often uncover unexpected relationships and connections that leave us scratching our heads in bewilderment or merely gasping for fresh air. And in this particular study, we have ventured into the expansive field of environmental and healthcare dynamics to explore the unique correlation between air pollution in Dayton and the genetic counselor population in Ohio. As we embark on this scientific adventure, we cannot help but acknowledge the "air" of mystery that surrounds these seemingly disparate variables.
Throughout history, the pursuit of knowledge has often led researchers down proverbial rabbit holes, and we find ourselves similarly tumbling into the enigmatic world of air quality and genetic counseling. The prevailing wisdom may assure us that these domains do not typically intersect, but such assumptions must be taken with a grain of salt – preferably iodized, for scientific rigor.
Before we dive headfirst into the dataset, let us take a moment to consider the comical chaos that ensues when we attempt to untangle the web of relationships in the world of scientific inquiry. It is akin to a plot twist in a science fiction movie – an unexpected turn of events that leaves us gripping our calculators in suspense, pondering the seemingly inexplicable connections between the pollutants swirling through the air in Dayton and the number of genetic counselors dotting the landscape of Ohio. It is almost as if the data itself is playing a mischievous game of hide-and-seek, daring us to uncover its clandestine secrets.
The essence of statistical analysis is often like a comedic ballet, with the data pirouetting and leapfrogging across scatterplots and regression models, leaving us frantically scribbling notes and muttering incantations to our trusty software programs. As researchers, we must not shy away from acknowledging the whimsical nature of our endeavors, embracing the unexpected twists and turns that add spice to our scientific pursuits.
So, grab your lab coat, dust off your graphing calculator, and join us as we embark on this riveting journey to unravel the curious relationship between air pollution and genetic counseling, where the statistical results may just astound you more than a magician's sleight of hand.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To tease out the relationship between the air pollution levels in Dayton and the population of genetic counselors in Ohio, we embarked on a statistical adventure that would make even the most intrepid data scientist break a sweat. Our data collection methods involved scouring the vast expanse of the Internet, with the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics serving as our trusty treasure maps through the labyrinth of numbers and figures.

We employed a range of statistical tools and techniques that could make even the most stoic researcher crack a smile. First, we harnessed the power of linear regression analysis, coaxing the data into revealing its secrets through a series of convoluted calculations. This allowed us to model the relationship between air pollution and the genetic counselor population, all the while marveling at the dance of R-squared values and beta coefficients.

In addition, we conducted a time series analysis to capture the ebb and flow of these variables over the years. This methodology enabled us to chronicle the evolution of air pollution in Dayton and the genetic counselor population in Ohio, as if we were recounting the plot twists in a gripping saga.

Furthermore, we utilized spatial analysis techniques to examine the geographical nuances underlying the relationship between air pollution and the distribution of genetic counselors across the state. By mapping out the spatial patterns, we hoped to unearth any hidden geographic influences that might be at play – a veritable game of cat and mouse with the intricacies of spatial statistics.

The statistical methods employed in this study were as diverse as a DNA sequence, encompassing everything from simple correlations to the intricate multivariate analyses that could bring a tear to the eye of the most weathered statistician.

Armed with these tools and a dose of scientific humor, we delved into the data with the fervor of intrepid explorers, unearthing the unexpected connections and peculiarities that lie at the intersection of air quality and human genetics. And as the dust settled on our statistical escapades, the results left us with more than a few statistical anecdotes to share with our colleagues.

In the immortal words of Marie Curie, "Nothing in life is to be feared, it is only to be understood. Now is the time to understand more, so that we may fear less." With this mantra in mind, we embraced the statistical pandemonium and emerged with a newfound appreciation for the whimsical nature of scientific inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dayton and The number of genetic counselors in Ohio. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2012 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9264197, r-squared of 0.8582535, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Air We Grow: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Genetic Counselor Population in Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the convoluted web of connections between air pollution in Dayton and the number of genetic counselors in Ohio. Employing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we scrutinize the correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9264197 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2022, suggesting that the presence of air pollution may be influencing the genetic counselor population in the state. The study sheds light on the unexpected interconnectedness of environmental factors and healthcare professions, ultimately prompting a reevaluation of the environmental determinants of human resources in the field of genetics.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the realm of research, we often uncover unexpected relationships and connections that leave us scratching our heads in bewilderment or merely gasping for fresh air. And in this particular study, we have ventured into the expansive field of environmental and healthcare dynamics to explore the unique correlation between air pollution in Dayton and the genetic counselor population in Ohio. As we embark on this scientific adventure, we cannot help but acknowledge the "air" of mystery that surrounds these seemingly disparate variables.
Throughout history, the pursuit of knowledge has often led researchers down proverbial rabbit holes, and we find ourselves similarly tumbling into the enigmatic world of air quality and genetic counseling. The prevailing wisdom may assure us that these domains do not typically intersect, but such assumptions must be taken with a grain of salt – preferably iodized, for scientific rigor.
Before we dive headfirst into the dataset, let us take a moment to consider the comical chaos that ensues when we attempt to untangle the web of relationships in the world of scientific inquiry. It is akin to a plot twist in a science fiction movie – an unexpected turn of events that leaves us gripping our calculators in suspense, pondering the seemingly inexplicable connections between the pollutants swirling through the air in Dayton and the number of genetic counselors dotting the landscape of Ohio. It is almost as if the data itself is playing a mischievous game of hide-and-seek, daring us to uncover its clandestine secrets.
The essence of statistical analysis is often like a comedic ballet, with the data pirouetting and leapfrogging across scatterplots and regression models, leaving us frantically scribbling notes and muttering incantations to our trusty software programs. As researchers, we must not shy away from acknowledging the whimsical nature of our endeavors, embracing the unexpected twists and turns that add spice to our scientific pursuits.
So, grab your lab coat, dust off your graphing calculator, and join us as we embark on this riveting journey to unravel the curious relationship between air pollution and genetic counseling, where the statistical results may just astound you more than a magician's sleight of hand.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data revealed a remarkably robust correlation between air pollution in Dayton and the number of genetic counselors in Ohio. Our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9264197, with an r-squared of 0.8582535 and a p-value of less than 0.01. These results suggest a highly significant and positively strong association between the level of air pollution and the genetic counselor workforce in Ohio.

Figure 1 presents a captivating scatterplot that graphically depicts this strong correlation between air pollution in Dayton and the number of genetic counselors in Ohio. The scatterplot, like a mischievous minx, delightfully illustrates the close relationship between these unlikely bedfellows, leaving us in awe of the unexpected union of environmental pollution and genetics professionals.

The strength of this correlation may seem as surprising as finding a moldy cheese sandwich in the lab refrigerator, but the robust statistical evidence leaves little room for doubt about the compelling relationship between these variables. This correlation defies the conventional boundaries of causal relationships, reminding us that in the intricate dance of science, one must always be prepared for a few unexpected steps and the occasional statistical foxtrot.

While our findings may raise more questions than they answer and leave us pondering the whims of fate and statistics, they offer a tantalizing glimpse into the intricacies of the interplay between environmental factors and healthcare professions. It appears that the invisible tendrils of air pollution reach further than we might have anticipated, leaving their mark on the genetic counseling landscape in Ohio. These results herald a new era of understanding, where the winds of change in air quality are intertwined with the genetic fabric of the healthcare workforce.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dayton and The number of genetic counselors in Ohio. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Air We Grow: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Genetic Counselor Population in Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the convoluted web of connections between air pollution in Dayton and the number of genetic counselors in Ohio. Employing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we scrutinize the correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9264197 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2022, suggesting that the presence of air pollution may be influencing the genetic counselor population in the state. The study sheds light on the unexpected interconnectedness of environmental factors and healthcare professions, ultimately prompting a reevaluation of the environmental determinants of human resources in the field of genetics.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In the pursuit of understanding the intricate connection between air pollution in Dayton and the genetic counselor population in Ohio, a plethora of studies have attempted to shed light on this perplexing relationship. Smith et al. (2015) emphasized the impact of environmental factors on healthcare professions, laying the groundwork for our investigation into this uncharted territory. Doe and Jones (2018) delved into the effects of air quality on human resources in the healthcare sector, prompting us to contemplate the poetically bewildering dance between pollutants and genetic counselors.
Turning the pages to non-fiction works related to air quality and healthcare, the Environmental Protection Agency's "State of the Air" report serves as a foundational source of information, unveiling the atmospheric drama that unfolds in Dayton and its potential repercussions on public health. Similarly, "Genetics and You: A Practical Guide" by Dr. Bio Lore provides a comprehensive examination of the genetic counseling landscape, offering invaluable insights that tantalize and mystify researchers much like a riveting whodunit novel.
In the realm of fiction, J.K. Rowling's "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Genes" might not directly address our research question, but it certainly casts a spell of intrigue and curiosity over the unexplored connections between environmental influences and genetic destiny. Meanwhile, Margaret Atwood's "Ozone Swoon" weaves a dystopian narrative of a world engulfed in air pollution, prompting readers to ponder the real-life implications of our investigation in a manner that is as thought-provoking as it is alarmingly wacky.
Expanding our scope to the cinematic world, "The Air Quality and the Furious" offers a thrilling portrayal of air pollution's potential impact on the dynamics of genetic counseling – a high-octane exploration that leaves audiences breathless, both from the adrenaline and the implications of our research. Additionally, "The Good, the Bad, and the Smoggy" presents a lighthearted yet surprisingly poignant reflection on the interplay between air pollution and human health, reminding us that even the most unlikely pairings can yield riveting insights.
As we sift through this eclectic array of literature, we are reminded of the delightful absurdity that often accompanies scientific pursuits, where the line between serious inquiry and whimsical exploration blurs like a pointillist painting viewed through fogged-up glasses. With each turn of the page, we are propelled further into an intellectual romp that leaves us simultaneously scratching our heads and clutching our sides with laughter, adding an element of delightful eccentricity to our scholarly endeavors.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a remarkably robust correlation between air pollution in Dayton and the number of genetic counselors in Ohio. Our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9264197, with an r-squared of 0.8582535 and a p-value of less than 0.01. These results suggest a highly significant and positively strong association between the level of air pollution and the genetic counselor workforce in Ohio.
Figure 1 presents a captivating scatterplot that graphically depicts this strong correlation between air pollution in Dayton and the number of genetic counselors in Ohio. The scatterplot, like a mischievous minx, delightfully illustrates the close relationship between these unlikely bedfellows, leaving us in awe of the unexpected union of environmental pollution and genetics professionals.
The strength of this correlation may seem as surprising as finding a moldy cheese sandwich in the lab refrigerator, but the robust statistical evidence leaves little room for doubt about the compelling relationship between these variables. This correlation defies the conventional boundaries of causal relationships, reminding us that in the intricate dance of science, one must always be prepared for a few unexpected steps and the occasional statistical foxtrot.
While our findings may raise more questions than they answer and leave us pondering the whims of fate and statistics, they offer a tantalizing glimpse into the intricacies of the interplay between environmental factors and healthcare professions. It appears that the invisible tendrils of air pollution reach further than we might have anticipated, leaving their mark on the genetic counseling landscape in Ohio. These results herald a new era of understanding, where the winds of change in air quality are intertwined with the genetic fabric of the healthcare workforce.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study offer a riveting glimpse into the unexpected harmony between air pollution in Dayton and the genetic counselor population in Ohio. As we reflect on the whimsical journey that brought us to these striking findings, it becomes clear that our statistical analysis has uncovered a tale as intriguing as a Sherlock Holmes mystery and as complex as a strand of DNA itself.

Our findings align with previous research, as Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2018) provided early clues to the link between environmental factors and the healthcare workforce. Much like intrepid explorers, they ventured into uncharted territories, paving the way for our own unraveling of this intricate relationship. The narratives woven by these esteemed researchers provided the vital breadcrumbs that ultimately led us to the treasure trove of statistical significance.

While the literature review may have taken us on a delightful detour through whimsical fiction and cinematic adventures, it is apparent that the serious undertones and playful observations truly underscored the enigmatic nature of our investigation. The unexpected link between the atmospheric drama of Dayton and the genetic counseling landscape was brought to life in a cacophony of statistical elegance, much like a captivating symphony that leaves the audience in awe of its mesmerizing harmony.

The presence of a remarkably strong correlation coefficient between air pollution and the genetic counselor workforce mirrors the unlikely yet enchanting union of peanut butter and jelly – a perfect match hidden in plain sight, waiting to be uncovered by the discerning eye of statistical analysis. This correlation may seem as perplexing as a squirrel attempting to solve a Rubik's Cube, but the robust evidence presented by our findings serves as a testament to the unsuspecting bonds that underpin the fabric of our research inquiry.

Indeed, the scatterplot that visually encapsulates this robust correlation between air pollution and genetic counselors beckons the viewer to ponder the enigmatic dance between these variables, akin to a thought-provoking piece of abstract art that leaves the audience captivated by its unexpected beauty. The implications of this correlation extend beyond the traditional boundaries of causality, akin to discovering a genie in a statistical bottle, releasing a whirlwind of contemplation on the potential ramifications within the genetic counseling landscape.

As the scientific community grapples with the implications of our findings, it is evident that the interplay between air pollution and the genetic counselor workforce transcends the ordinary, much like a magician pulling a rabbit out of a statistical hat. Our results offer a tantalizing glimpse into the intricate tapestry of environmental influences on healthcare professions, signaling a paradigm shift in our understanding of the unseen forces that shape the genetic counseling landscape. These unexpected revelations prompt us to embrace the quirkiness of scientific inquiry and remind us that in the enchanting waltz of research, the most unlikely pairings can yield the most captivating insights.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Dayton and The number of genetic counselors in Ohio. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Air We Grow: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Genetic Counselor Population in Ohio"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the convoluted web of connections between air pollution in Dayton and the number of genetic counselors in Ohio. Employing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we scrutinize the correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9264197 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2022, suggesting that the presence of air pollution may be influencing the genetic counselor population in the state. The study sheds light on the unexpected interconnectedness of environmental factors and healthcare professions, ultimately prompting a reevaluation of the environmental determinants of human resources in the field of genetics.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the realm of research, we often uncover unexpected relationships and connections that leave us scratching our heads in bewilderment or merely gasping for fresh air. And in this particular study, we have ventured into the expansive field of environmental and healthcare dynamics to explore the unique correlation between air pollution in Dayton and the genetic counselor population in Ohio. As we embark on this scientific adventure, we cannot help but acknowledge the "air" of mystery that surrounds these seemingly disparate variables.
Throughout history, the pursuit of knowledge has often led researchers down proverbial rabbit holes, and we find ourselves similarly tumbling into the enigmatic world of air quality and genetic counseling. The prevailing wisdom may assure us that these domains do not typically intersect, but such assumptions must be taken with a grain of salt – preferably iodized, for scientific rigor.
Before we dive headfirst into the dataset, let us take a moment to consider the comical chaos that ensues when we attempt to untangle the web of relationships in the world of scientific inquiry. It is akin to a plot twist in a science fiction movie – an unexpected turn of events that leaves us gripping our calculators in suspense, pondering the seemingly inexplicable connections between the pollutants swirling through the air in Dayton and the number of genetic counselors dotting the landscape of Ohio. It is almost as if the data itself is playing a mischievous game of hide-and-seek, daring us to uncover its clandestine secrets.
The essence of statistical analysis is often like a comedic ballet, with the data pirouetting and leapfrogging across scatterplots and regression models, leaving us frantically scribbling notes and muttering incantations to our trusty software programs. As researchers, we must not shy away from acknowledging the whimsical nature of our endeavors, embracing the unexpected twists and turns that add spice to our scientific pursuits.
So, grab your lab coat, dust off your graphing calculator, and join us as we embark on this riveting journey to unravel the curious relationship between air pollution and genetic counseling, where the statistical results may just astound you more than a magician's sleight of hand.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a remarkably robust correlation between air pollution in Dayton and the number of genetic counselors in Ohio. Our findings unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9264197, with an r-squared of 0.8582535 and a p-value of less than 0.01. These results suggest a highly significant and positively strong association between the level of air pollution and the genetic counselor workforce in Ohio.
Figure 1 presents a captivating scatterplot that graphically depicts this strong correlation between air pollution in Dayton and the number of genetic counselors in Ohio. The scatterplot, like a mischievous minx, delightfully illustrates the close relationship between these unlikely bedfellows, leaving us in awe of the unexpected union of environmental pollution and genetics professionals.
The strength of this correlation may seem as surprising as finding a moldy cheese sandwich in the lab refrigerator, but the robust statistical evidence leaves little room for doubt about the compelling relationship between these variables. This correlation defies the conventional boundaries of causal relationships, reminding us that in the intricate dance of science, one must always be prepared for a few unexpected steps and the occasional statistical foxtrot.
While our findings may raise more questions than they answer and leave us pondering the whims of fate and statistics, they offer a tantalizing glimpse into the intricacies of the interplay between environmental factors and healthcare professions. It appears that the invisible tendrils of air pollution reach further than we might have anticipated, leaving their mark on the genetic counseling landscape in Ohio. These results herald a new era of understanding, where the winds of change in air quality are intertwined with the genetic fabric of the healthcare workforce.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unraveled a tantalizing tale of interconnectedness, weaving a narrative that is as surprising as finding a unicorn grazing in a data field. The robust correlation between air pollution in Dayton and the genetic counselor population in Ohio speaks volumes about the quirky ways in which environmental factors can shape the healthcare landscape. It's as if the winds of change are blowing through the genetic counseling profession, leaving us pondering the genetic implications of pollutant particles on the airwaves.

The statistically significant relationship we've uncovered is akin to discovering a hidden treasure in a labyrinth of data – a glimmering gem that leaves us marveling at the serendipitous dance of variables. Our findings highlight the whimsical nature of scientific inquiry, where the most unexpected connections can lead us down a rabbit hole of statistical fascination.

However, despite the temptation to delve deeper into this enigmatic relationship, it seems that our journey through this peculiar scientific landscape has reached its conclusion. The evidence we've unearthed is as clear as a freshly polished microscope slide, leaving little room for ambiguity. Therefore, it is with unwavering confidence that we assert that no further research is needed in this domain. Our study stands as a beacon of statistical merriment, shedding light on the playful nuances of data analysis and the delightful surprises that await those who dare to venture into the labyrinth of scientific inquiry. It's a reminder that in the realm of research, as in life, there is always room for a few statistical plot twists and a touch of whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Air We Grow: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Genetic Counselor Population in Ohio. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Genetic Environmental Epidemiology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Air We Grow: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Genetic Counselor Population in Ohio. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Genetic Environmental Epidemiology Research (CGEER)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Air We Grow: Exploring the Relationship Between Air Pollution in Dayton and the Genetic Counselor Population in Ohio with an abstract of This study delves into the convoluted web of connections between air pollution in Dayton and the number of genetic counselors in Ohio. Employing data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we scrutinize the correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables. Our findings reveal a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9264197 and p < 0.01 for the period from 2012 to 2022, suggesting that the presence of air pollution may be influencing the genetic counselor population in the state. The study sheds light on the unexpected interconnectedness of environmental factors and healthcare professions, ultimately prompting a reevaluation of the environmental determinants of human resources in the field of genetics.

ChatGPT:

Air pollution, genetic counselors, Dayton air pollution, Ohio genetic counselor population, environmental factors, healthcare professions, correlation coefficient, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Environmental Protection Agency data

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Dayton
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with moderate or worse air quality in Dayton, OH
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Dayton

The number of genetic counselors in Ohio
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of genetic counselors in Ohio
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of genetic counselors in Ohio

Correlation r = 0.9264197 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8582535 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of genetic counselors in Ohio) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Dayton) over the 11 years from 2012 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.2E-5. 0.0000418259471858340450000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 0.0042% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 23,909 random variables You don't actually need 23 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.74, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Dayton (Bad air quality days)57.103851.506947.397336.712332.786929.58940.27441.643833.606637.808229.863
The number of genetic counselors in Ohio (Genetic Counselors)18015014014010011013013011012090




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([57.1038,51.5069,47.3973,36.7123,32.7869,29.589,40.274,41.6438,33.6066,37.8082,29.863,])
array_2 = np.array([180,150,140,140,100,110,130,130,110,120,90,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Dayton"
array_2_name = "The number of genetic counselors in Ohio"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 2996 · Black Variable ID: 20525 · Red Variable ID: 19400
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0