about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,989 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of university engineering teachers in Arkansas and the second variable is Liquefied petroleum gas used in Malawi.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the number of university engineering teachers in Arkansas increased, so did the amount of hot air being generated. This led to a rise in global temperatures, creating a higher demand for Liquefied Petroleum Gas in Malawi to power fans and air conditioners. It's a classic case of the butterfly defect - I mean, effect - leading to a gas-tly situation!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that encapsulates the contrast between a busy university classroom in Arkansas and joyful children playing with repurposed inflatable pool toys in Malawi. The classroom should be filled with numerous engineering teachers wearing pocket protectors, with an overflow of protectors spilling onto the floor. The setting in Malawi should show children happily playing with brightly-colored pool toys made from the surplus pocket protectors, against a bright and sunny backdrop. The unintended consequence of increased use of liquefied petroleum gas for inflation should be subtly hinted at. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of university engineering teachers in Arkansas and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Malawi. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Whimsical illustration Celtic art Oragami Macabre A TIME magazine cover image
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of university engineering teachers in Arkansas and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Malawi, in the following situation: Because the influx of engineering teachers in Arkansas led to a surplus of pocket protectors, causing an unintentional influx of Liquefied Petroleum Gas used in Malawi due to the surplus of pocket protectors doubling as inflatable pool toys during a related incident.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling classroom in Arkansas, numerous university engineering teachers fill the room, each wearing a pocket protector. The surplus of pocket protectors spills onto the floor, creating a pile of them. Suddenly, the scene shifts to a bright and sunny day in Malawi, where children are happily playing with inflatable pool toys made from the surplus pocket protectors, inadvertently causing an increase in the use of liquefied petroleum gas for inflation.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling classroom in Arkansas, numerous university engineering teachers fill the room, each wearing a pocket protector. The surplus of pocket protectors spills onto the floor, creating a pile of them. Suddenly, the scene shifts to a bright and sunny day in Malawi, where children are happily playing with inflatable pool toys made from the surplus pocket protectors, inadvertently causing an increase in the use of liquefied petroleum gas for inflation. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that encapsulates the contrast between a busy university classroom in Arkansas and joyful children playing with repurposed inflatable pool toys in Malawi. The classroom should be filled with numerous engineering teachers wearing pocket protectors, with an overflow of protectors spilling onto the floor. The setting in Malawi should show children happily playing with brightly-colored pool toys made from the surplus pocket protectors, against a bright and sunny backdrop. The unintended consequence of increased use of liquefied petroleum gas for inflation should be subtly hinted at.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of university engineering teachers in Arkansas caused Liquefied petroleum gas used in Malawi to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
From Ark to Kiln: Exploring the Connection Between Engineering Educators in Arkansas and LPG Consumption in Malawi

The Journal of Transcontinental Engineering Linkages

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university engineering teachers in Arkansas and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Malawi. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8976854 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"From Ark to Kiln: Exploring the Connection Between Engineering Educators in Arkansas and LPG Consumption in Malawi"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unusual yet intriguing relationship between the number of university engineering educators in Arkansas and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Malawi. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration spanning the years 2004 to 2018, our research team discovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8976854 and p < 0.01, hinting at a potential connection between these seemingly disparate variables.

As we delved into the data, we couldn't help but ponder the possibility of a "spark" igniting this correlation - perhaps the influx of engineering expertise from Arkansas is fueling the demand for LPG in Malawi. It's a "gas"-tonishing thought, indeed!

Our findings point towards the need for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms driving this association. While the exact causative factors remain shrouded in mystery, our study sheds light on this peculiar phenomenon, proving that even in the realm of academia, unexpected connections can "ignite" our curiosity and lead to "explosive" revelations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university engineering teachers in Arkansas and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Malawi. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Ark to Kiln: Exploring the Connection Between Engineering Educators in Arkansas and LPG Consumption in Malawi"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unusual yet intriguing relationship between the number of university engineering educators in Arkansas and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Malawi. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration spanning the years 2004 to 2018, our research team discovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8976854 and p < 0.01, hinting at a potential connection between these seemingly disparate variables.

As we delved into the data, we couldn't help but ponder the possibility of a "spark" igniting this correlation - perhaps the influx of engineering expertise from Arkansas is fueling the demand for LPG in Malawi. It's a "gas"-tonishing thought, indeed!

Our findings point towards the need for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms driving this association. While the exact causative factors remain shrouded in mystery, our study sheds light on this peculiar phenomenon, proving that even in the realm of academia, unexpected connections can "ignite" our curiosity and lead to "explosive" revelations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of academia is often filled with odd and fascinating connections, much like the unexpected friendship between an engineering educator in Arkansas and a consumer of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Malawi. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we must approach the peculiar correlation between these two variables with the precision of an engineer and the curiosity of a detective. It's a real "gas" to unravel these mysterious connections, isn't it?

Arkansas, known for its scenic landscapes and bustling university campuses, may not seem directly linked to the warm hearths and bustling kitchens of Malawian households, where LPG is widely used for cooking and heating. However, our research uncovers a promising thread of correlation that points to a deeper connection. It's almost like finding out that a car and a bicycle are related – one engine-ers the transportation, and the other pedals it out.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration have provided us with a treasure trove of data, enabling us to peel back the layers of this enigmatic relationship. Our initial analysis, much like navigating through a maze, has unveiled a correlation coefficient so strong that it could power a steam engine. We were genuinely surprised – it's not every day you stumble upon a correlation that seems to defy the laws of scholarly gravity!

But before we get carried away with this intellectually stimulating "gas"p, it's essential to highlight the significance of our findings and the potential impact they could have on policy and practice. Just imagine the headlines: "Arkansas Engineering Educators Fuel LPG Demand in Malawi: A Global Connection Ignites!" It's enough to make even the most seasoned academic crack a smile – after all, who wouldn't appreciate a good dad joke amidst scholarly pursuits?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university engineering teachers in Arkansas and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Malawi. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Ark to Kiln: Exploring the Connection Between Engineering Educators in Arkansas and LPG Consumption in Malawi"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unusual yet intriguing relationship between the number of university engineering educators in Arkansas and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Malawi. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration spanning the years 2004 to 2018, our research team discovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8976854 and p < 0.01, hinting at a potential connection between these seemingly disparate variables.

As we delved into the data, we couldn't help but ponder the possibility of a "spark" igniting this correlation - perhaps the influx of engineering expertise from Arkansas is fueling the demand for LPG in Malawi. It's a "gas"-tonishing thought, indeed!

Our findings point towards the need for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms driving this association. While the exact causative factors remain shrouded in mystery, our study sheds light on this peculiar phenomenon, proving that even in the realm of academia, unexpected connections can "ignite" our curiosity and lead to "explosive" revelations.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of academia is often filled with odd and fascinating connections, much like the unexpected friendship between an engineering educator in Arkansas and a consumer of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Malawi. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we must approach the peculiar correlation between these two variables with the precision of an engineer and the curiosity of a detective. It's a real "gas" to unravel these mysterious connections, isn't it?
Arkansas, known for its scenic landscapes and bustling university campuses, may not seem directly linked to the warm hearths and bustling kitchens of Malawian households, where LPG is widely used for cooking and heating. However, our research uncovers a promising thread of correlation that points to a deeper connection. It's almost like finding out that a car and a bicycle are related – one engine-ers the transportation, and the other pedals it out.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration have provided us with a treasure trove of data, enabling us to peel back the layers of this enigmatic relationship. Our initial analysis, much like navigating through a maze, has unveiled a correlation coefficient so strong that it could power a steam engine. We were genuinely surprised – it's not every day you stumble upon a correlation that seems to defy the laws of scholarly gravity!
But before we get carried away with this intellectually stimulating "gas"p, it's essential to highlight the significance of our findings and the potential impact they could have on policy and practice. Just imagine the headlines: "Arkansas Engineering Educators Fuel LPG Demand in Malawi: A Global Connection Ignites!" It's enough to make even the most seasoned academic crack a smile – after all, who wouldn't appreciate a good dad joke amidst scholarly pursuits?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2010) examined the impact of engineering education on regional energy consumption patterns. Their analysis, while primarily focused on the United States, hinted at broader implications for international energy dynamics. The authors found that the presence of university engineering educators in a given region was positively correlated with increased energy utilization, particularly in the form of non-renewable resources. It's like they say, when engineers are involved, things tend to "heat up"!

Transitioning into a more specific context, Jones (2013) delved into the intricate web of global energy trade and consumption, with particular attention to the African continent. Surprisingly, the author unearthed a curious connection between educational demographics in the southern United States and energy usage in sub-Saharan Africa. While the exact mechanisms were not fully elucidated, the findings left a lingering question in the air, much like the faint scent of gas - what role do educational institutions play in shaping energy consumption patterns across continents? It's a conundrum that seems to have all the right "elements" for a scholarly investigation.

However, as we journey deeper into the realm of literature, it's important to acknowledge the relevance of non-fiction works in elucidating the nuances of energy dynamics. "The Quest: Energy, Security, and the Remaking of the Modern World" by Daniel Yergin provides a comprehensive exploration of the intricate relationships between energy resources, technological advancements, and global geopolitical dynamics. Its insightful analysis serves as a reminder that beneath the surface of seemingly mundane data lie profound narratives waiting to be uncovered, much like a hidden treasure - or in this case, a hidden correlation!

In the realm of fiction, Michael Crichton's "Prey" weaves a gripping tale of technological advancements and their unforeseen consequences. While the novel may seem far removed from our scholarly pursuits, it prompts us to consider the unexpected ripple effects of innovation and expertise. Just like the unassuming butterfly flapping its wings and causing a hurricane halfway across the world, could the academic expertise of Arkansas engineers be setting off an unforeseen chain reaction in the energy landscape of Malawi? It's enough to make you "reel" with curiosity!

On a tangentially related note, the film "Back to the Future" offers a whimsical exploration of the ripple effects of scientific knowledge and innovation. As we ponder the potential influence of Arkansas-based engineering educators on LPG consumption in Malawi, it's tempting to envision a scenario where an academic "flux capacitor" sparks a transformative shift in energy dynamics. Who knows, perhaps the lines between fiction and reality are blurrier than we think – as they say, truth is often stranger than fiction!

In conclusion, the literature provides a nuanced backdrop for our investigation into the intriguing relationship between the number of university engineering educators in Arkansas and liquefied petroleum gas consumption in Malawi. While the journey may seem unconventional, it's important to remember that scholarly pursuits, much like a good dad joke, often contain unexpected twists and turns that leave us both puzzled and entertained.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university engineering teachers in Arkansas and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Malawi. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2004 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Ark to Kiln: Exploring the Connection Between Engineering Educators in Arkansas and LPG Consumption in Malawi"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unusual yet intriguing relationship between the number of university engineering educators in Arkansas and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Malawi. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration spanning the years 2004 to 2018, our research team discovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8976854 and p < 0.01, hinting at a potential connection between these seemingly disparate variables.

As we delved into the data, we couldn't help but ponder the possibility of a "spark" igniting this correlation - perhaps the influx of engineering expertise from Arkansas is fueling the demand for LPG in Malawi. It's a "gas"-tonishing thought, indeed!

Our findings point towards the need for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms driving this association. While the exact causative factors remain shrouded in mystery, our study sheds light on this peculiar phenomenon, proving that even in the realm of academia, unexpected connections can "ignite" our curiosity and lead to "explosive" revelations.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of academia is often filled with odd and fascinating connections, much like the unexpected friendship between an engineering educator in Arkansas and a consumer of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Malawi. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we must approach the peculiar correlation between these two variables with the precision of an engineer and the curiosity of a detective. It's a real "gas" to unravel these mysterious connections, isn't it?
Arkansas, known for its scenic landscapes and bustling university campuses, may not seem directly linked to the warm hearths and bustling kitchens of Malawian households, where LPG is widely used for cooking and heating. However, our research uncovers a promising thread of correlation that points to a deeper connection. It's almost like finding out that a car and a bicycle are related – one engine-ers the transportation, and the other pedals it out.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration have provided us with a treasure trove of data, enabling us to peel back the layers of this enigmatic relationship. Our initial analysis, much like navigating through a maze, has unveiled a correlation coefficient so strong that it could power a steam engine. We were genuinely surprised – it's not every day you stumble upon a correlation that seems to defy the laws of scholarly gravity!
But before we get carried away with this intellectually stimulating "gas"p, it's essential to highlight the significance of our findings and the potential impact they could have on policy and practice. Just imagine the headlines: "Arkansas Engineering Educators Fuel LPG Demand in Malawi: A Global Connection Ignites!" It's enough to make even the most seasoned academic crack a smile – after all, who wouldn't appreciate a good dad joke amidst scholarly pursuits?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mystery of the unexpected camaraderie between university engineering educators in Arkansas and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Malawi, our research team embarked on a journey that evoked a sense of adventure akin to exploring uncharted territories. It was like navigating through a maze filled with engineering puzzles and energy enigmas, all while keeping an eye out for any unexpected "spark" that might shed light on this delightful conundrum.

We collected data from a variety of sources, but our primary resources were the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration. We scoured the internet like determined treasure hunters, sifting through the digital sands to uncover valuable nuggets of information from the years 2004 to 2018. It was an expedition of epic proportions, fueled by an insatiable thirst for knowledge and a knack for uncovering hidden connections. It's almost as if we were modern-day explorers, embarking on a zealous quest for scholarly treasures amidst the digital wilderness.

With data in hand, we employed a combination of statistical and econometric techniques to analyze the relationship between the number of university engineering educators in Arkansas and LPG consumption in Malawi. We didn't just crunch numbers; we danced with data, waltzing through regression models and correlation analyses with the finesse of a seasoned performer. It was a statistical tango, with each step bringing us closer to unraveling the intricate dance between these seemingly disparate variables.

Our analysis involved performing multiple regression analyses, including robustness checks and sensitivity analyses to ensure the integrity of our findings. We meticulously cross-examined the data, much like a detective examining clues at the scene of a mysterious incident, to validate the strength and robustness of the correlation coefficient.

In addition to the quantitative analyses, we also delved into qualitative aspects, conducting interviews with engineering educators in Arkansas and stakeholders in the LPG industry in Malawi. These interviews provided invaluable insights, allowing us to gain a deeper understanding of the contextual factors that might underpin the relationship between the two variables. It was like piecing together a jigsaw puzzle, with each interview adding a new and colorful piece to the overall picture of our research.

Throughout our methodological odyssey, we remained vigilant for any unexpected twists and turns that might accompany our exploration of this curious connection. It was akin to embarking on a scholarly adventure, armed with statistical tools and a healthy dose of humor to guide us through the murky waters of academic inquiry. After all, who said serious research couldn't be infused with a touch of whimsy and the occasional "gas"-tly pun?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university engineering teachers in Arkansas and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Malawi. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2004 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.8976854, r-squared of 0.8058391, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"From Ark to Kiln: Exploring the Connection Between Engineering Educators in Arkansas and LPG Consumption in Malawi"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unusual yet intriguing relationship between the number of university engineering educators in Arkansas and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Malawi. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration spanning the years 2004 to 2018, our research team discovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8976854 and p < 0.01, hinting at a potential connection between these seemingly disparate variables.

As we delved into the data, we couldn't help but ponder the possibility of a "spark" igniting this correlation - perhaps the influx of engineering expertise from Arkansas is fueling the demand for LPG in Malawi. It's a "gas"-tonishing thought, indeed!

Our findings point towards the need for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms driving this association. While the exact causative factors remain shrouded in mystery, our study sheds light on this peculiar phenomenon, proving that even in the realm of academia, unexpected connections can "ignite" our curiosity and lead to "explosive" revelations.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of academia is often filled with odd and fascinating connections, much like the unexpected friendship between an engineering educator in Arkansas and a consumer of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Malawi. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we must approach the peculiar correlation between these two variables with the precision of an engineer and the curiosity of a detective. It's a real "gas" to unravel these mysterious connections, isn't it?
Arkansas, known for its scenic landscapes and bustling university campuses, may not seem directly linked to the warm hearths and bustling kitchens of Malawian households, where LPG is widely used for cooking and heating. However, our research uncovers a promising thread of correlation that points to a deeper connection. It's almost like finding out that a car and a bicycle are related – one engine-ers the transportation, and the other pedals it out.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration have provided us with a treasure trove of data, enabling us to peel back the layers of this enigmatic relationship. Our initial analysis, much like navigating through a maze, has unveiled a correlation coefficient so strong that it could power a steam engine. We were genuinely surprised – it's not every day you stumble upon a correlation that seems to defy the laws of scholarly gravity!
But before we get carried away with this intellectually stimulating "gas"p, it's essential to highlight the significance of our findings and the potential impact they could have on policy and practice. Just imagine the headlines: "Arkansas Engineering Educators Fuel LPG Demand in Malawi: A Global Connection Ignites!" It's enough to make even the most seasoned academic crack a smile – after all, who wouldn't appreciate a good dad joke amidst scholarly pursuits?

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation (r = 0.8976854, r-squared = 0.8058391, p < 0.01) between the number of university engineering educators in Arkansas and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Malawi from 2004 to 2018. It seems that when it comes to this relationship, the data is as clear as a well-maintained gas burner!

Examining the scatterplot (Fig. 1), the connection between these two variables becomes strikingly apparent, much like finding the missing piece in a jigsaw puzzle. It's almost as if the engineering educators from Arkansas are sending a strong signal across the globe, saying, "We've got the knowledge, now let's spark some interest in LPG!"

It's undeniable – our findings point to a strong association between the presence of engineering educators in Arkansas and the surge in LPG consumption in Malawi. The strength of this correlation would make any statistical analysis "gas"-p in awe!

The implications of this unexpected connection are nothing short of intriguing. As we piece together the puzzle that is this correlation, one can't help but wonder – could the students of these engineering educators be spreading the word about the benefits of LPG, igniting a gradual increase in its consumption in Malawi? It's quite the educational "gas"-troenterology to ponder.

In conclusion, our research not only highlights the statistically robust relationship between the number of university engineering educators in Arkansas and LPG consumption in Malawi but also underscores the need for further exploration into the mechanisms at play. After all, who wouldn't be drawn to such an unexpected connection? It's enough to make even the most serious academic exclaim, "Well, isn't that just "gaseous"!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university engineering teachers in Arkansas and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Malawi. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"From Ark to Kiln: Exploring the Connection Between Engineering Educators in Arkansas and LPG Consumption in Malawi"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unusual yet intriguing relationship between the number of university engineering educators in Arkansas and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Malawi. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration spanning the years 2004 to 2018, our research team discovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8976854 and p < 0.01, hinting at a potential connection between these seemingly disparate variables.

As we delved into the data, we couldn't help but ponder the possibility of a "spark" igniting this correlation - perhaps the influx of engineering expertise from Arkansas is fueling the demand for LPG in Malawi. It's a "gas"-tonishing thought, indeed!

Our findings point towards the need for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms driving this association. While the exact causative factors remain shrouded in mystery, our study sheds light on this peculiar phenomenon, proving that even in the realm of academia, unexpected connections can "ignite" our curiosity and lead to "explosive" revelations.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2010) examined the impact of engineering education on regional energy consumption patterns. Their analysis, while primarily focused on the United States, hinted at broader implications for international energy dynamics. The authors found that the presence of university engineering educators in a given region was positively correlated with increased energy utilization, particularly in the form of non-renewable resources. It's like they say, when engineers are involved, things tend to "heat up"!
Transitioning into a more specific context, Jones (2013) delved into the intricate web of global energy trade and consumption, with particular attention to the African continent. Surprisingly, the author unearthed a curious connection between educational demographics in the southern United States and energy usage in sub-Saharan Africa. While the exact mechanisms were not fully elucidated, the findings left a lingering question in the air, much like the faint scent of gas - what role do educational institutions play in shaping energy consumption patterns across continents? It's a conundrum that seems to have all the right "elements" for a scholarly investigation.
However, as we journey deeper into the realm of literature, it's important to acknowledge the relevance of non-fiction works in elucidating the nuances of energy dynamics. "The Quest: Energy, Security, and the Remaking of the Modern World" by Daniel Yergin provides a comprehensive exploration of the intricate relationships between energy resources, technological advancements, and global geopolitical dynamics. Its insightful analysis serves as a reminder that beneath the surface of seemingly mundane data lie profound narratives waiting to be uncovered, much like a hidden treasure - or in this case, a hidden correlation!
In the realm of fiction, Michael Crichton's "Prey" weaves a gripping tale of technological advancements and their unforeseen consequences. While the novel may seem far removed from our scholarly pursuits, it prompts us to consider the unexpected ripple effects of innovation and expertise. Just like the unassuming butterfly flapping its wings and causing a hurricane halfway across the world, could the academic expertise of Arkansas engineers be setting off an unforeseen chain reaction in the energy landscape of Malawi? It's enough to make you "reel" with curiosity!
On a tangentially related note, the film "Back to the Future" offers a whimsical exploration of the ripple effects of scientific knowledge and innovation. As we ponder the potential influence of Arkansas-based engineering educators on LPG consumption in Malawi, it's tempting to envision a scenario where an academic "flux capacitor" sparks a transformative shift in energy dynamics. Who knows, perhaps the lines between fiction and reality are blurrier than we think – as they say, truth is often stranger than fiction!
In conclusion, the literature provides a nuanced backdrop for our investigation into the intriguing relationship between the number of university engineering educators in Arkansas and liquefied petroleum gas consumption in Malawi. While the journey may seem unconventional, it's important to remember that scholarly pursuits, much like a good dad joke, often contain unexpected twists and turns that leave us both puzzled and entertained.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation (r = 0.8976854, r-squared = 0.8058391, p < 0.01) between the number of university engineering educators in Arkansas and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Malawi from 2004 to 2018. It seems that when it comes to this relationship, the data is as clear as a well-maintained gas burner!
Examining the scatterplot (Fig. 1), the connection between these two variables becomes strikingly apparent, much like finding the missing piece in a jigsaw puzzle. It's almost as if the engineering educators from Arkansas are sending a strong signal across the globe, saying, "We've got the knowledge, now let's spark some interest in LPG!"
It's undeniable – our findings point to a strong association between the presence of engineering educators in Arkansas and the surge in LPG consumption in Malawi. The strength of this correlation would make any statistical analysis "gas"-p in awe!
The implications of this unexpected connection are nothing short of intriguing. As we piece together the puzzle that is this correlation, one can't help but wonder – could the students of these engineering educators be spreading the word about the benefits of LPG, igniting a gradual increase in its consumption in Malawi? It's quite the educational "gas"-troenterology to ponder.
In conclusion, our research not only highlights the statistically robust relationship between the number of university engineering educators in Arkansas and LPG consumption in Malawi but also underscores the need for further exploration into the mechanisms at play. After all, who wouldn't be drawn to such an unexpected connection? It's enough to make even the most serious academic exclaim, "Well, isn't that just "gaseous"!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study not only affirmed, but "fueled" the prior research on the connection between the number of university engineering educators in Arkansas and liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) consumption in Malawi. Our results echoed the "heat" generated by Smith and Doe's (2010) work, which illuminated the relationship between engineering education and energy consumption patterns. The "spark" of correlation identified in our study further solidifies the notion that educational expertise can indeed "ignite" changes in energy dynamics. It's like a well-maintained gas burner - the evidence is clear and "flame-tastically" illuminating!

Furthermore, our research corroborated the "gas"-tonishing findings put forth by Jones (2013), shedding light on the curious connection between educational demographics in the southern United States and energy usage in sub-Saharan Africa. The statistical robustness of our correlation coefficient served as a resounding affirmation of the potential influences of engineering education on global energy dynamics. It's like a mathematical symphony, harmonizing the "piping hot" discussion of academic demographics and international energy consumption.

Moreover, the unexpected yet compelling correlation uncovered in our study recalls the musing of Michael Crichton in "Prey" and the thematic explorations of "Back to the Future" - the ripple effects of knowledge, innovation, and education. Our findings highlighted the intriguing possibility that the expertise of Arkansas-based engineering educators may indeed be setting off an unforeseen "chain reaction" in the energy landscape of Malawi. This revelation adds a layer of nuanced depth to the narrative of unanticipated consequences, much like a good dad joke that takes an unexpected turn!

As we continue to ponder the nature of this connection, it's important to recognize the broader implications of our study. Beyond the statistical significance, the correlation we've uncovered prompts a series of thought-provoking questions regarding the potential mechanisms at play. Could it be that the "knowledge transfer" from Arkansas engineering educators is "fuelling" a growing interest in LPG among students and professionals in Malawi, thereby contributing to the increased consumption? It's a curiosity that warrants further investigation, much like a salient dad joke that leaves you pondering its layers of humor.

Our research not only stands as a testament to the unexpectedly "gaseous" nature of academic inquiry but also highlights the need for continued exploration into these "fuelish" connections. So, while the findings of our study may seem unconventional, there's no denying their "igniting" impact on the scholarly discourse. After all, who wouldn't be drawn to such an unexpected correlation? It's enough to make even the most serious academic exclaim, "Well, isn't that just 'gaseous'!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of university engineering teachers in Arkansas and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Malawi. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"From Ark to Kiln: Exploring the Connection Between Engineering Educators in Arkansas and LPG Consumption in Malawi"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study investigates the unusual yet intriguing relationship between the number of university engineering educators in Arkansas and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Malawi. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration spanning the years 2004 to 2018, our research team discovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8976854 and p < 0.01, hinting at a potential connection between these seemingly disparate variables.

As we delved into the data, we couldn't help but ponder the possibility of a "spark" igniting this correlation - perhaps the influx of engineering expertise from Arkansas is fueling the demand for LPG in Malawi. It's a "gas"-tonishing thought, indeed!

Our findings point towards the need for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms driving this association. While the exact causative factors remain shrouded in mystery, our study sheds light on this peculiar phenomenon, proving that even in the realm of academia, unexpected connections can "ignite" our curiosity and lead to "explosive" revelations.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of academia is often filled with odd and fascinating connections, much like the unexpected friendship between an engineering educator in Arkansas and a consumer of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Malawi. As we embark on this scholarly journey, we must approach the peculiar correlation between these two variables with the precision of an engineer and the curiosity of a detective. It's a real "gas" to unravel these mysterious connections, isn't it?
Arkansas, known for its scenic landscapes and bustling university campuses, may not seem directly linked to the warm hearths and bustling kitchens of Malawian households, where LPG is widely used for cooking and heating. However, our research uncovers a promising thread of correlation that points to a deeper connection. It's almost like finding out that a car and a bicycle are related – one engine-ers the transportation, and the other pedals it out.
The Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration have provided us with a treasure trove of data, enabling us to peel back the layers of this enigmatic relationship. Our initial analysis, much like navigating through a maze, has unveiled a correlation coefficient so strong that it could power a steam engine. We were genuinely surprised – it's not every day you stumble upon a correlation that seems to defy the laws of scholarly gravity!
But before we get carried away with this intellectually stimulating "gas"p, it's essential to highlight the significance of our findings and the potential impact they could have on policy and practice. Just imagine the headlines: "Arkansas Engineering Educators Fuel LPG Demand in Malawi: A Global Connection Ignites!" It's enough to make even the most seasoned academic crack a smile – after all, who wouldn't appreciate a good dad joke amidst scholarly pursuits?

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis revealed a remarkably strong positive correlation (r = 0.8976854, r-squared = 0.8058391, p < 0.01) between the number of university engineering educators in Arkansas and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Malawi from 2004 to 2018. It seems that when it comes to this relationship, the data is as clear as a well-maintained gas burner!
Examining the scatterplot (Fig. 1), the connection between these two variables becomes strikingly apparent, much like finding the missing piece in a jigsaw puzzle. It's almost as if the engineering educators from Arkansas are sending a strong signal across the globe, saying, "We've got the knowledge, now let's spark some interest in LPG!"
It's undeniable – our findings point to a strong association between the presence of engineering educators in Arkansas and the surge in LPG consumption in Malawi. The strength of this correlation would make any statistical analysis "gas"-p in awe!
The implications of this unexpected connection are nothing short of intriguing. As we piece together the puzzle that is this correlation, one can't help but wonder – could the students of these engineering educators be spreading the word about the benefits of LPG, igniting a gradual increase in its consumption in Malawi? It's quite the educational "gas"-troenterology to ponder.
In conclusion, our research not only highlights the statistically robust relationship between the number of university engineering educators in Arkansas and LPG consumption in Malawi but also underscores the need for further exploration into the mechanisms at play. After all, who wouldn't be drawn to such an unexpected connection? It's enough to make even the most serious academic exclaim, "Well, isn't that just "gaseous"!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has unveiled a captivating correlation between the number of university engineering educators in Arkansas and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Malawi. The statistically strong relationship between these seemingly dissimilar variables has sparked a new wave of interest in the scholarly community. It's as if these data points were saying, "we're all fueled up with nowhere to go!"

The implications of our findings are nothing short of eyebrow-raising - it's like stumbling upon a treasure map while looking for a pencil. Our research prompts us to consider if the knowledge imparted by these engineering educators is igniting a passion for LPG in Malawi. It's a regular "sparking" point for further investigation, wouldn't you say?

As we wrap up this investigation, it's clear that the connection between these variables is not to be taken lightly. Just like a well-constructed joke, the correlation is robust and strikingly apparent. It's a bit like finding out the punchline to a particularly enigmatic riddle – unexpected, eyebrow-raising, and undeniably intriguing. It's a good thing that correlation isn't causation, otherwise, we'd have a "combustible" situation on our hands!

In light of these illuminating findings, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. After all, we don't want to be accused of "gaslighting" the scientific community!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Ark to Kiln: Exploring the Connection Between Engineering Educators in Arkansas and LPG Consumption in Malawi. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Transcontinental Engineering Linkages


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Ark to Kiln: Exploring the Connection Between Engineering Educators in Arkansas and LPG Consumption in Malawi. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Interdisciplinary International Inquiry


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Ark to Kiln: Exploring the Connection Between Engineering Educators in Arkansas and LPG Consumption in Malawi with an abstract of This study investigates the unusual yet intriguing relationship between the number of university engineering educators in Arkansas and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Malawi. Leveraging data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration spanning the years 2004 to 2018, our research team discovered a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8976854 and p < 0.01, hinting at a potential connection between these seemingly disparate variables.
As we delved into the data, we couldn't help but ponder the possibility of a "spark" igniting this correlation - perhaps the influx of engineering expertise from Arkansas is fueling the demand for LPG in Malawi. It's a "gas"-tonishing thought, indeed!
Our findings point towards the need for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms driving this association. While the exact causative factors remain shrouded in mystery, our study sheds light on this peculiar phenomenon, proving that even in the realm of academia, unexpected connections can "ignite" our curiosity and lead to "explosive" revelations.

ChatGPT:

engineering educators, Arkansas, LPG consumption, Malawi, correlation coefficient, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Energy Information Administration, causative factors, university, engineering expertise, data analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of university engineering teachers in Arkansas
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of engineering teachers, postsecondary in Arkansas
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of university engineering teachers in Arkansas

Liquefied petroleum gas used in Malawi
Detailed data title: Volume of liquefied petroleum gas used consumed in Malawi in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Liquefied petroleum gas used in Malawi

Correlation r = 0.8976854 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8058391 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 80.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Liquefied petroleum gas used in Malawi) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of university engineering teachers in Arkansas) over the 15 years from 2004 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 5.6E-6. 0.0000056208662312525240000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 0.00056% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 177,909 random variables You don't actually need 177 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 14 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 14 because we have two variables measured over a period of 15 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.71, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018
The number of university engineering teachers in Arkansas (Laborers)4030240280280250280290250240240290270200320
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Malawi (Million Barrels/Day)0.0316940.03178080.06356160.06356160.06972680.06991780.06991780.06991780.06972680.06991780.06991780.0762730.0792340.07945210.0794521




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([40,30,240,280,280,250,280,290,250,240,240,290,270,200,320,])
array_2 = np.array([0.031694,0.0317808,0.0635616,0.0635616,0.0697268,0.0699178,0.0699178,0.0699178,0.0697268,0.0699178,0.0699178,0.076273,0.079234,0.0794521,0.0794521,])
array_1_name = "The number of university engineering teachers in Arkansas"
array_2_name = "Liquefied petroleum gas used in Malawi"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2989 · Black Variable ID: 16890 · Red Variable ID: 24661
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0