about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,967 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and the second variable is Google searches for 'i have a headache'.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The reason for this correlation is that the GMO corn in North Dakota has been engineered to be extra "corny," leading to an uptick in the production of corny jokes. As a result, people can't help but groan and roll their eyes, which in turn leads to an increase in headaches. It seems the problem is ear-resistible!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generating prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] of a serene cornfield in North Dakota, with the golden sun casting warm, vibrant hues across the landscape. The tall stalks of genetically modified corn stand tall and sway gently in the breeze. In the midst of the field, a group of people sit on the ground, surrounded by the towering cornstalks. They furrow their brows as they stare intently at their smartphones, searching 'i have a headache' on Google. The frequencies emitted by the GMO corn seem to stir a sense of discomfort, leading to a surge in headache-related searches. The scene captures the contrast between the natural beauty of the cornfield and the technological intrusion of the smartphones, alluding to the unintended consequences of genetic modification. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image Cyberpunk An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Whimsical illustration A photo-realistic image
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Google searches for 'i have a headache', in the following situation: Because GMO corn in North Dakota emits a frequency that resonates with the human brain, causing an increase in Google searches for 'i have a headache'.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sunny cornfield in North Dakota, the tall stalks of genetically modified corn sway gently in the breeze. Amidst the golden hues, a group of people sit on their phones, furrowing their brows as they search 'i have a headache' on Google. The frequencies emitted by the GMO corn seem to stir a sense of discomfort, leading to the surge in headache-related searches.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In a sunny cornfield in North Dakota, the tall stalks of genetically modified corn sway gently in the breeze. Amidst the golden hues, a group of people sit on their phones, furrowing their brows as they search 'i have a headache' on Google. The frequencies emitted by the GMO corn seem to stir a sense of discomfort, leading to the surge in headache-related searches. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generating prompt: [ A photo-realistic image ] of a serene cornfield in North Dakota, with the golden sun casting warm, vibrant hues across the landscape. The tall stalks of genetically modified corn stand tall and sway gently in the breeze. In the midst of the field, a group of people sit on the ground, surrounded by the towering cornstalks. They furrow their brows as they stare intently at their smartphones, searching 'i have a headache' on Google. The frequencies emitted by the GMO corn seem to stir a sense of discomfort, leading to a surge in headache-related searches. The scene captures the contrast between the natural beauty of the cornfield and the technological intrusion of the smartphones, alluding to the unintended consequences of genetic modification.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota caused i have a headache (Google searches for 'i have a headache') to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Corn's Modified Genes and Google Searches: A Rhyme-y Investigation into I Have a Headache

The Journal of Agricultural Innovation and Information Technology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9010044 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Corn's Modified Genes and Google Searches: A Rhyme-y Investigation into "I Have a Headache"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i have a headache." Our study aims to shed light on whether GMOs have any unexpected effects on human health, or if they're just corn-y.

Using USDA data on corn production and Google Trends for search patterns, we found a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9010044 between GMO corn cultivation and people seeking headache relief online. It seems the corn and the complaints are quite the match, begging the question: is this just a corn-incidence, or is there a kernel of truth in this connection?

Furthermore, our analysis revealed that the p-value is less than 0.01, suggesting a high level of confidence in the relationship between GMO corn and headaches commonly sought out on the internet. Looks like the data is ripe for an ear-opening revelation, but let's not stalk our claims too quickly - we'll need to husk around for any lurking confounders before jumping to conclusions.

In conclusion, our findings imply a striking linkage between genetically modified corn and the online quest for headache remedies. The tale of this correlation might be as old as corn itself, but the plot thickens with every kernel of data we pop. Whether it's the GMO or just the MO of the internet-searching populace, this study shows that when it comes to headaches, it may not always be a mere grain of truth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Corn's Modified Genes and Google Searches: A Rhyme-y Investigation into "I Have a Headache"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i have a headache." Our study aims to shed light on whether GMOs have any unexpected effects on human health, or if they're just corn-y.

Using USDA data on corn production and Google Trends for search patterns, we found a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9010044 between GMO corn cultivation and people seeking headache relief online. It seems the corn and the complaints are quite the match, begging the question: is this just a corn-incidence, or is there a kernel of truth in this connection?

Furthermore, our analysis revealed that the p-value is less than 0.01, suggesting a high level of confidence in the relationship between GMO corn and headaches commonly sought out on the internet. Looks like the data is ripe for an ear-opening revelation, but let's not stalk our claims too quickly - we'll need to husk around for any lurking confounders before jumping to conclusions.

In conclusion, our findings imply a striking linkage between genetically modified corn and the online quest for headache remedies. The tale of this correlation might be as old as corn itself, but the plot thickens with every kernel of data we pop. Whether it's the GMO or just the MO of the internet-searching populace, this study shows that when it comes to headaches, it may not always be a mere grain of truth.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Introduction

Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) have become a staple of modern agriculture, with crops like corn undergoing significant genetic modifications to enhance traits such as pest resistance and yield. However, the widespread adoption of GMOs has also given rise to public concerns regarding their potential impacts on human health. In recent years, the search for answers to questions around GMO safety has led us to rather unexpected places - even to the realm of internet search behavior. It seems we're not just cob-fused about the effects of GMOs, but also getting a headache over them.

The aim of this study is to analyze the curious relationship between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i have a headache." We seek to examine whether there exists a statistically significant correlation between the use of GMO corn and the occurrence of headaches, or if this is just a kernel of an idea. Yes, it's a-maize-ing how we've found ourselves pondering such a corny correlation, but we're committed to getting to the root of this matter.

As we embark on this research journey, we are reminded of the words of F. Scott Fitzgerald: "The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function." In the spirit of this wisdom, we're prepared to navigate the kernels of truth and husk out any misconceptions in our pursuit of understanding the potential interplay between GMO corn and the metaphorical thorn in our side - headaches.

Our investigation adopts a quantitative approach, leveraging USDA data on corn production and Google Trends to discern patterns in search behavior. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we endeavor to sift through the data kernels and determine whether there exists a bona fide connection between GMO corn and the quest for headache relief online. After all, we wouldn't want to jump to conclusions and end up with a corn-y research paper - that would just be a-maize-ing.

With the stage set for our investigation into this curious conundrum, we proceed to unravel the mystery and separate the wheat from the chaff in the realm of GMO corn and headaches. After all, in the world of research, a little humor may just be the ear-resistible seasoning we need to make our findings pop.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Corn's Modified Genes and Google Searches: A Rhyme-y Investigation into "I Have a Headache"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i have a headache." Our study aims to shed light on whether GMOs have any unexpected effects on human health, or if they're just corn-y.

Using USDA data on corn production and Google Trends for search patterns, we found a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9010044 between GMO corn cultivation and people seeking headache relief online. It seems the corn and the complaints are quite the match, begging the question: is this just a corn-incidence, or is there a kernel of truth in this connection?

Furthermore, our analysis revealed that the p-value is less than 0.01, suggesting a high level of confidence in the relationship between GMO corn and headaches commonly sought out on the internet. Looks like the data is ripe for an ear-opening revelation, but let's not stalk our claims too quickly - we'll need to husk around for any lurking confounders before jumping to conclusions.

In conclusion, our findings imply a striking linkage between genetically modified corn and the online quest for headache remedies. The tale of this correlation might be as old as corn itself, but the plot thickens with every kernel of data we pop. Whether it's the GMO or just the MO of the internet-searching populace, this study shows that when it comes to headaches, it may not always be a mere grain of truth.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) have become a staple of modern agriculture, with crops like corn undergoing significant genetic modifications to enhance traits such as pest resistance and yield. However, the widespread adoption of GMOs has also given rise to public concerns regarding their potential impacts on human health. In recent years, the search for answers to questions around GMO safety has led us to rather unexpected places - even to the realm of internet search behavior. It seems we're not just cob-fused about the effects of GMOs, but also getting a headache over them.
The aim of this study is to analyze the curious relationship between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i have a headache." We seek to examine whether there exists a statistically significant correlation between the use of GMO corn and the occurrence of headaches, or if this is just a kernel of an idea. Yes, it's a-maize-ing how we've found ourselves pondering such a corny correlation, but we're committed to getting to the root of this matter.
As we embark on this research journey, we are reminded of the words of F. Scott Fitzgerald: "The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function." In the spirit of this wisdom, we're prepared to navigate the kernels of truth and husk out any misconceptions in our pursuit of understanding the potential interplay between GMO corn and the metaphorical thorn in our side - headaches.
Our investigation adopts a quantitative approach, leveraging USDA data on corn production and Google Trends to discern patterns in search behavior. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we endeavor to sift through the data kernels and determine whether there exists a bona fide connection between GMO corn and the quest for headache relief online. After all, we wouldn't want to jump to conclusions and end up with a corn-y research paper - that would just be a-maize-ing.
With the stage set for our investigation into this curious conundrum, we proceed to unravel the mystery and separate the wheat from the chaff in the realm of GMO corn and headaches. After all, in the world of research, a little humor may just be the ear-resistible seasoning we need to make our findings pop.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their study, Smith and colleagues (2020) investigated the impact of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) on human health, focusing specifically on the cultivation of GMO corn in various regions of the United States. While their research primarily delved into physiological responses to GMO consumption, their findings also hinted at potential correlations with online health-related searches. Similarly, Doe et al. (2018) explored the potential effects of GMO corn cultivation on public health, highlighting the need for comprehensive analysis beyond traditional health indicators.

With the growing interest in the potential health implications of GMOs, the literature has witnessed a curious intersection with unexpected inquiries into online search behavior. This unconventional avenue of exploration prompts a corn-ucopia of questions regarding the relationship between GMO corn and virtual quests for headache relief. It seems that as researchers, we need to keep our ears to the ground and our eyes on the cornfield to uncover the potential kernels of truth in this peculiar correlation.

In "GMOs and You: Navigating the Maze of Corn Science" by Dr. Maize (2019), the author delves into the intricate world of genetically modified corn, outlining the extensive modifications that have transformed the agricultural landscape. The book not only provides insights into the scientific intricacies of GMOs but also touches upon the societal debates and public perceptions surrounding these modified crops. It's a-maize-ing to think that amidst all this complexity, our investigation leads us to the realm of Google searches and headache inquiries.

On a more whimsical note, "Corn Chronicles: Tales from the Field" by A. Kernel (2015) offers a charming narrative of corn farming and the enchanting tales of the crop's journey from seed to harvest. While the book may not directly tackle the GMO debate, its whimsical storytelling serves as a reminder to maintain a sense of wonder and curiosity as we delve into our own investigation. After all, the road to discovery may just be paved with a-dorn-able tales of corn and its unexpected interactions with human health.

Turning to the world of fiction, "The Maze Runner" by James Dashner (2009) presents a gripping narrative set amidst a mysterious maze. While the book's plot may seem unrelated to our research on GMOs and headaches, the metaphorical significance of navigating complex mazes certainly resonates with the challenges of disentangling potential correlations in our study. As we venture deeper into the twists and turns of GMO corn and headache searches, we'll need our own metaphorical maze-running skills to navigate this puzzling connection.

In the whimsical realm of cartoons, "Corn on the Cob and the Curious Case of Headache House" from the beloved children's show "VeggieTales" addresses the peculiar challenges faced by anthropomorphic corn characters. While the show's lighthearted nature may appear far removed from the rigor of academic research, it reminds us that sometimes, unexpected connections can yield important insights. Who knows, perhaps a whimsical tune or two from "VeggieTales" may serve as the background melody to our own investigation into the curiously intertwined worlds of corn and headaches.

So, amidst the pages of scholarly research, non-fiction explorations, fiction escapades, and animated tales, we find ourselves embarking on a research journey that transcends traditional boundaries. As we unravel the potential link between genetically modified corn and online queries for headache remedies, we're prepared to encounter a-maize-ing revelations and corn-y puns along the way. After all, in the pursuit of knowledge, a little humor may just be the seasoning we need to make our findings pop.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2005 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Corn's Modified Genes and Google Searches: A Rhyme-y Investigation into "I Have a Headache"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i have a headache." Our study aims to shed light on whether GMOs have any unexpected effects on human health, or if they're just corn-y.

Using USDA data on corn production and Google Trends for search patterns, we found a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9010044 between GMO corn cultivation and people seeking headache relief online. It seems the corn and the complaints are quite the match, begging the question: is this just a corn-incidence, or is there a kernel of truth in this connection?

Furthermore, our analysis revealed that the p-value is less than 0.01, suggesting a high level of confidence in the relationship between GMO corn and headaches commonly sought out on the internet. Looks like the data is ripe for an ear-opening revelation, but let's not stalk our claims too quickly - we'll need to husk around for any lurking confounders before jumping to conclusions.

In conclusion, our findings imply a striking linkage between genetically modified corn and the online quest for headache remedies. The tale of this correlation might be as old as corn itself, but the plot thickens with every kernel of data we pop. Whether it's the GMO or just the MO of the internet-searching populace, this study shows that when it comes to headaches, it may not always be a mere grain of truth.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Introduction
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) have become a staple of modern agriculture, with crops like corn undergoing significant genetic modifications to enhance traits such as pest resistance and yield. However, the widespread adoption of GMOs has also given rise to public concerns regarding their potential impacts on human health. In recent years, the search for answers to questions around GMO safety has led us to rather unexpected places - even to the realm of internet search behavior. It seems we're not just cob-fused about the effects of GMOs, but also getting a headache over them.
The aim of this study is to analyze the curious relationship between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i have a headache." We seek to examine whether there exists a statistically significant correlation between the use of GMO corn and the occurrence of headaches, or if this is just a kernel of an idea. Yes, it's a-maize-ing how we've found ourselves pondering such a corny correlation, but we're committed to getting to the root of this matter.
As we embark on this research journey, we are reminded of the words of F. Scott Fitzgerald: "The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function." In the spirit of this wisdom, we're prepared to navigate the kernels of truth and husk out any misconceptions in our pursuit of understanding the potential interplay between GMO corn and the metaphorical thorn in our side - headaches.
Our investigation adopts a quantitative approach, leveraging USDA data on corn production and Google Trends to discern patterns in search behavior. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we endeavor to sift through the data kernels and determine whether there exists a bona fide connection between GMO corn and the quest for headache relief online. After all, we wouldn't want to jump to conclusions and end up with a corn-y research paper - that would just be a-maize-ing.
With the stage set for our investigation into this curious conundrum, we proceed to unravel the mystery and separate the wheat from the chaff in the realm of GMO corn and headaches. After all, in the world of research, a little humor may just be the ear-resistible seasoning we need to make our findings pop.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Sampling and Data Collection
Our research team embarked on a cornucopia of data collection endeavors to unearth the potential connection between GMO corn cultivation in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for 'i have a headache'. Our primary data sources included the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for comprehensive information on corn production, and Google Trends for insights into the online search behavior of individuals seeking headache relief. To ensure a robust and representative sample, we gathered data spanning from 2005 to 2023, covering a significant timeframe to capture any potential trends and fluctuations in both GMO corn cultivation and headache-related online searches.

To adhere to rigorous research standards, our data collection process involved sifting through countless rows of data, much like one might sift through a metaphorical haystack in search of a kernel of truth. It was a process that required a keen eye for detail and a patient disposition, much like a farmer tending to their fields. After all, when it comes to research, it's always better to be corn-ate in our pursuit of accurate and reliable data.

Statistical Analysis
The collected data underwent a comprehensive statistical analysis to discern any noteworthy patterns or correlations. Our statistical methodology encompassed the use of correlation analysis to examine the relationship between GMO corn cultivation and the frequency of online searches for headache-related queries. In addition, we employed time series analysis to explore potential temporal trends in both GMO corn production and headache-related search behavior. Our choice of statistical methods was driven by the need to peel back the layers of data and reveal any underlying connections, much like peeling a particularly stubborn cob of corn.

To ensure our analysis was as a-maize-ing as possible, we calculated correlation coefficients and p-values, taking into account potential confounding variables such as seasonal variations, changes in internet usage patterns, and other external factors that could potentially kernel our findings. After all, in the world of research, it's crucial to husk for lurking variables that could skew our results and pop our statistical bubble.

In honor of completeness and thoroughness, we also conducted sensitivity analyses to assess the robustness of our findings under varying statistical assumptions. This involved exploring different parameters and model specifications to ensure that our results held up under different analytical conditions. We were committed to leaving no cob unturned in our pursuit of statistical rigor, after all - when it comes to research, it's always better to have a-maize-ing sensitivity than to be caught out in a statistical storm without an umbrella.

Ethical Considerations
As with any research endeavor, ethical considerations were paramount in our methodology. We ensured the privacy and confidentiality of all data sources, upholding the highest standards of data protection and anonymization. This was not just a matter of research ethics, but also a testament to our commitment to handling data with the utmost care and respect. After all, in the field of research, it's important to always do the kernel thing, even when the stakes are high.

In addition, our research methodology adhered to transparent and reproducible practices, ensuring that our analytical processes and data transformation steps were clearly documented and easily replicable. This was in line with the principles of scientific rigour and integrity - after all, in the pursuit of knowledge, it's vital to plant the seeds of transparency and reproducibility to yield fruitful and credible research outcomes.

----
Note: For the purpose of comedy and to maintain a light-hearted tone, the research methods and procedures described in the response are fictional and not based on actual scientific practices.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2005 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.9010044, r-squared of 0.8118090, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Corn's Modified Genes and Google Searches: A Rhyme-y Investigation into "I Have a Headache"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i have a headache." Our study aims to shed light on whether GMOs have any unexpected effects on human health, or if they're just corn-y.

Using USDA data on corn production and Google Trends for search patterns, we found a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9010044 between GMO corn cultivation and people seeking headache relief online. It seems the corn and the complaints are quite the match, begging the question: is this just a corn-incidence, or is there a kernel of truth in this connection?

Furthermore, our analysis revealed that the p-value is less than 0.01, suggesting a high level of confidence in the relationship between GMO corn and headaches commonly sought out on the internet. Looks like the data is ripe for an ear-opening revelation, but let's not stalk our claims too quickly - we'll need to husk around for any lurking confounders before jumping to conclusions.

In conclusion, our findings imply a striking linkage between genetically modified corn and the online quest for headache remedies. The tale of this correlation might be as old as corn itself, but the plot thickens with every kernel of data we pop. Whether it's the GMO or just the MO of the internet-searching populace, this study shows that when it comes to headaches, it may not always be a mere grain of truth.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Introduction
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) have become a staple of modern agriculture, with crops like corn undergoing significant genetic modifications to enhance traits such as pest resistance and yield. However, the widespread adoption of GMOs has also given rise to public concerns regarding their potential impacts on human health. In recent years, the search for answers to questions around GMO safety has led us to rather unexpected places - even to the realm of internet search behavior. It seems we're not just cob-fused about the effects of GMOs, but also getting a headache over them.
The aim of this study is to analyze the curious relationship between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i have a headache." We seek to examine whether there exists a statistically significant correlation between the use of GMO corn and the occurrence of headaches, or if this is just a kernel of an idea. Yes, it's a-maize-ing how we've found ourselves pondering such a corny correlation, but we're committed to getting to the root of this matter.
As we embark on this research journey, we are reminded of the words of F. Scott Fitzgerald: "The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function." In the spirit of this wisdom, we're prepared to navigate the kernels of truth and husk out any misconceptions in our pursuit of understanding the potential interplay between GMO corn and the metaphorical thorn in our side - headaches.
Our investigation adopts a quantitative approach, leveraging USDA data on corn production and Google Trends to discern patterns in search behavior. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we endeavor to sift through the data kernels and determine whether there exists a bona fide connection between GMO corn and the quest for headache relief online. After all, we wouldn't want to jump to conclusions and end up with a corn-y research paper - that would just be a-maize-ing.
With the stage set for our investigation into this curious conundrum, we proceed to unravel the mystery and separate the wheat from the chaff in the realm of GMO corn and headaches. After all, in the world of research, a little humor may just be the ear-resistible seasoning we need to make our findings pop.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i have a headache." The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.9010044, demonstrating a strong positive relationship between these two variables. This finding suggests that as GMO corn cultivation increased, so did the frequency of online queries related to headaches. It's as if the corn was whispering into people's ears, "I have a headache," leading them to seek solace on the internet.

In addition, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was determined to be 0.8118090, indicating that approximately 81% of the variation in headache-related searches can be explained by the variation in GMO corn cultivation. It's as if the corn was holding up a sign that said, "Get your headache here," and people were responding accordingly. Talk about a-maize-ing marketing tactics!

The p-value associated with the correlation was found to be less than 0.01, signifying a high level of confidence in the statistical significance of the relationship between GMO corn cultivation and Google searches for headache-related phrases. This result indicates that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation due to random chance alone is very low. It seems the connection between GMO corn and headaches isn't just a "kernel" of truth; it's statistically robust.

The findings are visually represented in Figure 1, which displays a scatterplot illustrating the positive correlation between GMO corn cultivation and the frequency of "i have a headache" searches. Each data point in the plot serves as a reminder that, much like the corn itself, this correlation is not something to be "stalked" carelessly. We must be diligent in peeling back the husks of uncertainty and potential confounders before jumping to conclusions.

This study, therefore, provides compelling evidence of a noteworthy association between the use of GMOs in corn cultivation and the prevalence of online searches for headache remedies. The data seem to suggest that when it comes to GMO corn and headaches, there's more than just a "grain" of truth to the connection. It appears that this research has really "ear-marked" a significant finding in the field of agricultural and internet health trends.

Overall, the results of this investigation supply a compelling case for further exploration into the potential impact of GMO corn on human health and online search behavior. The correlation observed here may prompt additional studies to explore the underlying mechanisms driving this intriguing relationship. After all, when it comes to GMOs and headaches, there's always room for more "ear-resistible" discoveries.

In conclusion, this study highlights a distinctive linkage between GMO corn cultivation and the online pursuit of headache remedies. The findings invite further exploration and analysis to uncover the root causes of this correlation. So, buckle up - it's quite the "corn-undrum"!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Corn's Modified Genes and Google Searches: A Rhyme-y Investigation into "I Have a Headache"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i have a headache." Our study aims to shed light on whether GMOs have any unexpected effects on human health, or if they're just corn-y.

Using USDA data on corn production and Google Trends for search patterns, we found a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9010044 between GMO corn cultivation and people seeking headache relief online. It seems the corn and the complaints are quite the match, begging the question: is this just a corn-incidence, or is there a kernel of truth in this connection?

Furthermore, our analysis revealed that the p-value is less than 0.01, suggesting a high level of confidence in the relationship between GMO corn and headaches commonly sought out on the internet. Looks like the data is ripe for an ear-opening revelation, but let's not stalk our claims too quickly - we'll need to husk around for any lurking confounders before jumping to conclusions.

In conclusion, our findings imply a striking linkage between genetically modified corn and the online quest for headache remedies. The tale of this correlation might be as old as corn itself, but the plot thickens with every kernel of data we pop. Whether it's the GMO or just the MO of the internet-searching populace, this study shows that when it comes to headaches, it may not always be a mere grain of truth.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study, Smith and colleagues (2020) investigated the impact of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) on human health, focusing specifically on the cultivation of GMO corn in various regions of the United States. While their research primarily delved into physiological responses to GMO consumption, their findings also hinted at potential correlations with online health-related searches. Similarly, Doe et al. (2018) explored the potential effects of GMO corn cultivation on public health, highlighting the need for comprehensive analysis beyond traditional health indicators.
With the growing interest in the potential health implications of GMOs, the literature has witnessed a curious intersection with unexpected inquiries into online search behavior. This unconventional avenue of exploration prompts a corn-ucopia of questions regarding the relationship between GMO corn and virtual quests for headache relief. It seems that as researchers, we need to keep our ears to the ground and our eyes on the cornfield to uncover the potential kernels of truth in this peculiar correlation.
In "GMOs and You: Navigating the Maze of Corn Science" by Dr. Maize (2019), the author delves into the intricate world of genetically modified corn, outlining the extensive modifications that have transformed the agricultural landscape. The book not only provides insights into the scientific intricacies of GMOs but also touches upon the societal debates and public perceptions surrounding these modified crops. It's a-maize-ing to think that amidst all this complexity, our investigation leads us to the realm of Google searches and headache inquiries.
On a more whimsical note, "Corn Chronicles: Tales from the Field" by A. Kernel (2015) offers a charming narrative of corn farming and the enchanting tales of the crop's journey from seed to harvest. While the book may not directly tackle the GMO debate, its whimsical storytelling serves as a reminder to maintain a sense of wonder and curiosity as we delve into our own investigation. After all, the road to discovery may just be paved with a-dorn-able tales of corn and its unexpected interactions with human health.
Turning to the world of fiction, "The Maze Runner" by James Dashner (2009) presents a gripping narrative set amidst a mysterious maze. While the book's plot may seem unrelated to our research on GMOs and headaches, the metaphorical significance of navigating complex mazes certainly resonates with the challenges of disentangling potential correlations in our study. As we venture deeper into the twists and turns of GMO corn and headache searches, we'll need our own metaphorical maze-running skills to navigate this puzzling connection.
In the whimsical realm of cartoons, "Corn on the Cob and the Curious Case of Headache House" from the beloved children's show "VeggieTales" addresses the peculiar challenges faced by anthropomorphic corn characters. While the show's lighthearted nature may appear far removed from the rigor of academic research, it reminds us that sometimes, unexpected connections can yield important insights. Who knows, perhaps a whimsical tune or two from "VeggieTales" may serve as the background melody to our own investigation into the curiously intertwined worlds of corn and headaches.
So, amidst the pages of scholarly research, non-fiction explorations, fiction escapades, and animated tales, we find ourselves embarking on a research journey that transcends traditional boundaries. As we unravel the potential link between genetically modified corn and online queries for headache remedies, we're prepared to encounter a-maize-ing revelations and corn-y puns along the way. After all, in the pursuit of knowledge, a little humor may just be the seasoning we need to make our findings pop.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i have a headache." The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.9010044, demonstrating a strong positive relationship between these two variables. This finding suggests that as GMO corn cultivation increased, so did the frequency of online queries related to headaches. It's as if the corn was whispering into people's ears, "I have a headache," leading them to seek solace on the internet.
In addition, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was determined to be 0.8118090, indicating that approximately 81% of the variation in headache-related searches can be explained by the variation in GMO corn cultivation. It's as if the corn was holding up a sign that said, "Get your headache here," and people were responding accordingly. Talk about a-maize-ing marketing tactics!
The p-value associated with the correlation was found to be less than 0.01, signifying a high level of confidence in the statistical significance of the relationship between GMO corn cultivation and Google searches for headache-related phrases. This result indicates that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation due to random chance alone is very low. It seems the connection between GMO corn and headaches isn't just a "kernel" of truth; it's statistically robust.
The findings are visually represented in Figure 1, which displays a scatterplot illustrating the positive correlation between GMO corn cultivation and the frequency of "i have a headache" searches. Each data point in the plot serves as a reminder that, much like the corn itself, this correlation is not something to be "stalked" carelessly. We must be diligent in peeling back the husks of uncertainty and potential confounders before jumping to conclusions.
This study, therefore, provides compelling evidence of a noteworthy association between the use of GMOs in corn cultivation and the prevalence of online searches for headache remedies. The data seem to suggest that when it comes to GMO corn and headaches, there's more than just a "grain" of truth to the connection. It appears that this research has really "ear-marked" a significant finding in the field of agricultural and internet health trends.
Overall, the results of this investigation supply a compelling case for further exploration into the potential impact of GMO corn on human health and online search behavior. The correlation observed here may prompt additional studies to explore the underlying mechanisms driving this intriguing relationship. After all, when it comes to GMOs and headaches, there's always room for more "ear-resistible" discoveries.
In conclusion, this study highlights a distinctive linkage between GMO corn cultivation and the online pursuit of headache remedies. The findings invite further exploration and analysis to uncover the root causes of this correlation. So, buckle up - it's quite the "corn-undrum"!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation into the potential association between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn within North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for "i have a headache" has yielded intriguing findings. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9010044 between these variables suggests a notable relationship that piques both scientific curiosity and public interest. It appears that the proverbial "ear" of corn may indeed have whispered something significant into the virtual ears of the internet-searching populace.

Building upon the whimsical thread woven through the literature review, it's a-maize-ing to see how the findings from Smith and colleagues (2020), along with the insights from Doe et al. (2018), have been supported by our own investigation. The correlation coefficient of 0.9010044 aligns with the earlier indications of potential linkages between GMO corn cultivation and online health-related inquiries. This cornnection, if you will, not only reaffirms the importance of exploring unconventional avenues in GMO research but also brings a kernel of truth to the unexpected relationship between corn and headaches.

As we navigate the "maze" of data analysis, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) further reinforces the substantial impact of GMO corn cultivation on headache-related searches, explaining approximately 81% of the variation in these online inquiries. The statistical robustness of our findings, as underscored by the p-value of less than 0.01, lends support to the idea that the correlation observed is likely not just a chance encounter in the cornfield. It's as if the results are saying, "Don't dismiss the corn-incidence too hastily; there's something worth shucking here."

Moreover, the visual representation in Figure 1 serves as a visual "ear-con" to the observed correlation, reminding us of the need to approach the interpretation of our findings with caution. Much like a kernel of corn, this correlation demands careful "husking" to uncover any lurking confounders and to avoid jumping to hasty conclusions. It seems that our journey through the "cornfield" of research has led us to a more substantive understanding of the potential impact of GMO corn on public health preferences and, dare I say, internet search behavior.

In the amusing spirit of A. Kernel's "Corn Chronicles" and the whimsical tunes from "VeggieTales," our investigation has indeed been a reminder that unexpected connections can yield significant insights. The intersection of GMOs and internet inquiries reflects the multifaceted nature of contemporary research, encompassing both scientific rigor and a delightful sense of curiosity. Who knew that an investigation into corn and headaches would yield such intriguing findings? It seems that in the "corn-undrum" of science, there's always room for a-maize-ing discoveries and the occasional dad joke.

In the light of our findings, it becomes paramount to recognize the need for further research to unpack the underlying mechanisms driving this peculiar correlation. From genetic pathways of corn hybrids to the psychological factors influencing internet search behavior, there's a cornucopia of avenues for deeper exploration. This correlation, much like the ear of corn itself, may hold many layers of complexity that warrant comprehensive investigation.

So, as researchers, let's embrace the unexpected, the whimsical, and the corn-y as we maneuver through the scientific "cornfield." Our investigation has certainly offered an intriguing perspective on the potential interplay between GMO corn and headache-related queries. As we continue our pursuit of knowledge, let's keep our senses peeled for the a-maize-ing revelations that may yet sprout from this peculiar connection. After all, as the saying goes, "When life gives you GMO corn and headaches, make cornbread and a dad joke."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Google searches for 'i have a headache'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Corn's Modified Genes and Google Searches: A Rhyme-y Investigation into "I Have a Headache"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i have a headache." Our study aims to shed light on whether GMOs have any unexpected effects on human health, or if they're just corn-y.

Using USDA data on corn production and Google Trends for search patterns, we found a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9010044 between GMO corn cultivation and people seeking headache relief online. It seems the corn and the complaints are quite the match, begging the question: is this just a corn-incidence, or is there a kernel of truth in this connection?

Furthermore, our analysis revealed that the p-value is less than 0.01, suggesting a high level of confidence in the relationship between GMO corn and headaches commonly sought out on the internet. Looks like the data is ripe for an ear-opening revelation, but let's not stalk our claims too quickly - we'll need to husk around for any lurking confounders before jumping to conclusions.

In conclusion, our findings imply a striking linkage between genetically modified corn and the online quest for headache remedies. The tale of this correlation might be as old as corn itself, but the plot thickens with every kernel of data we pop. Whether it's the GMO or just the MO of the internet-searching populace, this study shows that when it comes to headaches, it may not always be a mere grain of truth.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Introduction
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) have become a staple of modern agriculture, with crops like corn undergoing significant genetic modifications to enhance traits such as pest resistance and yield. However, the widespread adoption of GMOs has also given rise to public concerns regarding their potential impacts on human health. In recent years, the search for answers to questions around GMO safety has led us to rather unexpected places - even to the realm of internet search behavior. It seems we're not just cob-fused about the effects of GMOs, but also getting a headache over them.
The aim of this study is to analyze the curious relationship between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i have a headache." We seek to examine whether there exists a statistically significant correlation between the use of GMO corn and the occurrence of headaches, or if this is just a kernel of an idea. Yes, it's a-maize-ing how we've found ourselves pondering such a corny correlation, but we're committed to getting to the root of this matter.
As we embark on this research journey, we are reminded of the words of F. Scott Fitzgerald: "The test of a first-rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposed ideas in the mind at the same time, and still retain the ability to function." In the spirit of this wisdom, we're prepared to navigate the kernels of truth and husk out any misconceptions in our pursuit of understanding the potential interplay between GMO corn and the metaphorical thorn in our side - headaches.
Our investigation adopts a quantitative approach, leveraging USDA data on corn production and Google Trends to discern patterns in search behavior. Through rigorous statistical analysis, we endeavor to sift through the data kernels and determine whether there exists a bona fide connection between GMO corn and the quest for headache relief online. After all, we wouldn't want to jump to conclusions and end up with a corn-y research paper - that would just be a-maize-ing.
With the stage set for our investigation into this curious conundrum, we proceed to unravel the mystery and separate the wheat from the chaff in the realm of GMO corn and headaches. After all, in the world of research, a little humor may just be the ear-resistible seasoning we need to make our findings pop.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a striking correlation between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i have a headache." The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.9010044, demonstrating a strong positive relationship between these two variables. This finding suggests that as GMO corn cultivation increased, so did the frequency of online queries related to headaches. It's as if the corn was whispering into people's ears, "I have a headache," leading them to seek solace on the internet.
In addition, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was determined to be 0.8118090, indicating that approximately 81% of the variation in headache-related searches can be explained by the variation in GMO corn cultivation. It's as if the corn was holding up a sign that said, "Get your headache here," and people were responding accordingly. Talk about a-maize-ing marketing tactics!
The p-value associated with the correlation was found to be less than 0.01, signifying a high level of confidence in the statistical significance of the relationship between GMO corn cultivation and Google searches for headache-related phrases. This result indicates that the likelihood of observing such a strong correlation due to random chance alone is very low. It seems the connection between GMO corn and headaches isn't just a "kernel" of truth; it's statistically robust.
The findings are visually represented in Figure 1, which displays a scatterplot illustrating the positive correlation between GMO corn cultivation and the frequency of "i have a headache" searches. Each data point in the plot serves as a reminder that, much like the corn itself, this correlation is not something to be "stalked" carelessly. We must be diligent in peeling back the husks of uncertainty and potential confounders before jumping to conclusions.
This study, therefore, provides compelling evidence of a noteworthy association between the use of GMOs in corn cultivation and the prevalence of online searches for headache remedies. The data seem to suggest that when it comes to GMO corn and headaches, there's more than just a "grain" of truth to the connection. It appears that this research has really "ear-marked" a significant finding in the field of agricultural and internet health trends.
Overall, the results of this investigation supply a compelling case for further exploration into the potential impact of GMO corn on human health and online search behavior. The correlation observed here may prompt additional studies to explore the underlying mechanisms driving this intriguing relationship. After all, when it comes to GMOs and headaches, there's always room for more "ear-resistible" discoveries.
In conclusion, this study highlights a distinctive linkage between GMO corn cultivation and the online pursuit of headache remedies. The findings invite further exploration and analysis to uncover the root causes of this correlation. So, buckle up - it's quite the "corn-undrum"!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has illuminated a compelling correlation between the cultivation of GMO corn in North Dakota and the prevalence of Google searches for headache-related queries. It seems that as GMO corn production swells, so does the online hunt for relief from cranial discomfort. It's as if the corn is sending out "ear-resistible" signals, drawing people into the realm of internet medicine like a magnet-ear-ic field. *Cue the groans from dads everywhere*.

The statistical metrics, including the correlation coefficient, the coefficient of determination, and the p-value, all speak to the robustness and significance of this relationship. The "a-maize-ing" marketing analogy may be corny, but it's fitting for a connection so striking.

Our findings raise intriguing questions about the potential impact of GMOs on human health and online behavior. As we peel back the layers of this "corn-undrum," it becomes clear that there's more to this correlation than meets the eye. After all, when it comes to GMOs and headaches, we can't simply "cob" over the implications.

As tempting as it may be to pop more corny jokes, it's evident that no more research is needed in this area. Case closed, let's not "husk" around anymore.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Corn's Modified Genes and Google Searches: A Rhyme-y Investigation into I Have a Headache. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Innovation and Information Technology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Corn's Modified Genes and Google Searches: A Rhyme-y Investigation into I Have a Headache. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Agricultural Advancement and Online Humor Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Corn's Modified Genes and Google Searches: A Rhyme-y Investigation into I Have a Headache with an abstract of This paper investigates the relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in North Dakota and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i have a headache." Our study aims to shed light on whether GMOs have any unexpected effects on human health, or if they're just corn-y.
Using USDA data on corn production and Google Trends for search patterns, we found a staggering correlation coefficient of 0.9010044 between GMO corn cultivation and people seeking headache relief online. It seems the corn and the complaints are quite the match, begging the question: is this just a corn-incidence, or is there a kernel of truth in this connection?
Furthermore, our analysis revealed that the p-value is less than 0.01, suggesting a high level of confidence in the relationship between GMO corn and headaches commonly sought out on the internet. Looks like the data is ripe for an ear-opening revelation, but let's not stalk our claims too quickly - we'll need to husk around for any lurking confounders before jumping to conclusions.
In conclusion, our findings imply a striking linkage between genetically modified corn and the online quest for headache remedies. The tale of this correlation might be as old as corn itself, but the plot thickens with every kernel of data we pop. Whether it's the GMO or just the MO of the internet-searching populace, this study shows that when it comes to headaches, it may not always be a mere grain of truth.

ChatGPT:

GMO corn, genetically modified organisms, corn cultivation, GMOs and human health, Google search patterns, headache relief online, correlation between GMO corn and headaches, USDA data on corn production, Google Trends, p-value less than 0.01, GMO corn and internet search, lurking confounders, linkage between GMO corn and headaches, genetically modified corn and online quest for headache remedies.

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in North Dakota genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota

Google searches for 'i have a headache'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'i have a headache' (Worldwide), with quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'i have a headache'

Correlation r = 0.9010044 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8118090 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 81.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'i have a headache') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota) over the 19 years from 2005 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.4E-7. 0.0000001427362450804924900000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.9 in 1.4E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 7,005,929 random variables You don't actually need 7 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.76, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota (GMO corn %)15202231413739436968706667697875777485
Google searches for 'i have a headache' (Rel. search volume)5.083335.916675.166679.2515.166720.2527.416733.416736.833339.583339.54245.333350.333354.8333818077.583376.7778




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([15,20,22,31,41,37,39,43,69,68,70,66,67,69,78,75,77,74,85,])
array_2 = np.array([5.08333,5.91667,5.16667,9.25,15.1667,20.25,27.4167,33.4167,36.8333,39.5833,39.5,42,45.3333,50.3333,54.8333,81,80,77.5833,76.7778,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'i have a headache'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 2967 · Black Variable ID: 747 · Red Variable ID: 1524
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0