about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,922 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Jacqueline and the second variable is Arson in Washington.  The chart goes from 1985 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Fewer Jacquelines meant fewer Jakes, leading to a decrease in fire-related incidents in Washington. Looks like the name Jacqueline was just too hot to handle!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a tranquil Washington neighborhood with an eerie, cyber folk twist. A row of quaint, pastel-colored houses line the street, their roofs adorned with whimsical, neon cyberpunk motifs. Wisps of digital smoke seem to weave through the air, forming intricate patterns reminiscent of circuitry. The mailboxes display the gradually fading name "Jacqueline," illuminated by a soft, otherworldly glow. In the background, figures resembling ethereal cyber folk loom in the shadows, their presence hinting at a subdued, yet palpable air of mystery. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Jacqueline and Arson in Washington. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A Discovery magazine cover image Cyber folk Cyber folk Cyberpunk Cutsy graphics
ChatGPT: Cyber folk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Jacqueline and Arson in Washington, in the following situation: Because as the popularity of the name Jacqueline decreased, so did the number of amateur detectives attempting to solve mysterious crimes in Washington. With fewer people meddling in police investigations, the arsonists found it harder to execute their fiery plans, leading to a decrease in arson incidents.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a quiet Washington neighborhood, the name "Jacqueline" appeared less frequently on mailbox labels as the years passed. Meanwhile, the streets seemed less populated with amateur detectives trying to crack mysterious cases. As a result, the number of arson incidents in the area dwindled, as the once overly curious onlookers no longer stirred the embers of potential threats.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyber folk ] and depicting this scene: In a quiet Washington neighborhood, the name "Jacqueline" appeared less frequently on mailbox labels as the years passed. Meanwhile, the streets seemed less populated with amateur detectives trying to crack mysterious cases. As a result, the number of arson incidents in the area dwindled, as the once overly curious onlookers no longer stirred the embers of potential threats. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a tranquil Washington neighborhood with an eerie, cyber folk twist. A row of quaint, pastel-colored houses line the street, their roofs adorned with whimsical, neon cyberpunk motifs. Wisps of digital smoke seem to weave through the air, forming intricate patterns reminiscent of circuitry. The mailboxes display the gradually fading name "Jacqueline," illuminated by a soft, otherworldly glow. In the background, figures resembling ethereal cyber folk loom in the shadows, their presence hinting at a subdued, yet palpable air of mystery.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Popularity of the first name Jacqueline caused Arson in Washington to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Heat Wave: Exploring the Fiery Connection Between the Name Jacqueline and Arson in Washington

Journal of Fire Behavior and Personality Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jacqueline and Arson in Washington. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9455972 and p < 0.01 for 1985 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Heat Wave: Exploring the Fiery Connection Between the Name "Jacqueline" and Arson in Washington

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to investigate the correlation between the popularity of the first name Jacqueline and the occurrence of arson in the state of Washington. This research delves into the burning question of whether there is a significant relationship between the two, aiming to set the findings ablaze in the academic community. As researchers, we were fired up to uncover any potential links and not to be "burned out" until we had exhaustively examined the data.

Using data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we painstakingly analyzed records spanning from 1985 to 2022 to ignite insights into the potential association. Our findings illuminated a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9455972 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the relationship between the popularity of the name Jacqueline and the incidence of arson in Washington is indeed hot, hot, hot!

As we were knee-deep in data analysis, we couldn't help but appreciate the fiery nature of our research topic. But let's not jump to conclusions - we ember-k you to approach our findings with caution, as correlation does not prove causation. While the findings may spark interest, further research is needed to fully understand the "spark" behind this connection.

In conclusion, our research offers a scorching revelation of the potential link between the name "Jacqueline" and arson in Washington, igniting a flame of curiosity in the academic community. Our findings set the stage for future studies to fan the flames of understanding and explore the underlying factors contributing to this fiery phenomenon.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jacqueline and Arson in Washington. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Heat Wave: Exploring the Fiery Connection Between the Name "Jacqueline" and Arson in Washington

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to investigate the correlation between the popularity of the first name Jacqueline and the occurrence of arson in the state of Washington. This research delves into the burning question of whether there is a significant relationship between the two, aiming to set the findings ablaze in the academic community. As researchers, we were fired up to uncover any potential links and not to be "burned out" until we had exhaustively examined the data.

Using data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we painstakingly analyzed records spanning from 1985 to 2022 to ignite insights into the potential association. Our findings illuminated a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9455972 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the relationship between the popularity of the name Jacqueline and the incidence of arson in Washington is indeed hot, hot, hot!

As we were knee-deep in data analysis, we couldn't help but appreciate the fiery nature of our research topic. But let's not jump to conclusions - we ember-k you to approach our findings with caution, as correlation does not prove causation. While the findings may spark interest, further research is needed to fully understand the "spark" behind this connection.

In conclusion, our research offers a scorching revelation of the potential link between the name "Jacqueline" and arson in Washington, igniting a flame of curiosity in the academic community. Our findings set the stage for future studies to fan the flames of understanding and explore the underlying factors contributing to this fiery phenomenon.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The study of human behavior and its myriad influences can often lead researchers down unexpected paths. In the case of this research, we found ourselves delving into the unique and enigmatic correlation between the popularity of the first name Jacqueline and the occurrence of arson in the state of Washington. It's a fiery topic, to say the least!

As we set out on this investigation, we couldn't help but feel the heat of the burning curiosity surrounding this unusual connection. The fervent desire to uncover any potential links not only fueled our research but also provided ample opportunity for "hot" puns and playful wordplay. After all, what's a study on arson without a little spark of humor?

The purpose of this study was not to "fan the flames" of superstition or to ignite unnecessary alarm. Instead, we sought to approach the subject with the utmost rigor and statistical scrutiny. We were determined not to be "burned out" until we had thoroughly examined the data and stoked the flames of empirical evidence.

Delving into the records from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we were pleasantly surprised by the "fireworks" of insights that awaited us. The data from 1985 to 2022 offered a glowing opportunity to shed light on the potential association between the two variables.

It's important to note that our approach was not to "fire off" hasty conclusions, but rather to methodically analyze the data and kindle a thoughtful discussion in the academic community. At the end of the day, we believe that research should be both illuminating and engaging - not just a "flash in the pan."

As we unveil the scorching findings of this investigation, we invite our esteemed readers to approach the results with an open mind and perhaps a fire extinguisher in hand. Remember, when it comes to research, it's essential to keep a cool head while navigating the sizzling complexities of human phenomena.

In the following sections, we will elucidate our methodology, present the blistering results, and kindle a lively conversation about the potential implications of this unexpected, yet incendiary, correlation. So, grab your marshmallows and fire up your intellectual curiosity; it's about to get toasty in here!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jacqueline and Arson in Washington. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Heat Wave: Exploring the Fiery Connection Between the Name "Jacqueline" and Arson in Washington

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to investigate the correlation between the popularity of the first name Jacqueline and the occurrence of arson in the state of Washington. This research delves into the burning question of whether there is a significant relationship between the two, aiming to set the findings ablaze in the academic community. As researchers, we were fired up to uncover any potential links and not to be "burned out" until we had exhaustively examined the data.

Using data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we painstakingly analyzed records spanning from 1985 to 2022 to ignite insights into the potential association. Our findings illuminated a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9455972 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the relationship between the popularity of the name Jacqueline and the incidence of arson in Washington is indeed hot, hot, hot!

As we were knee-deep in data analysis, we couldn't help but appreciate the fiery nature of our research topic. But let's not jump to conclusions - we ember-k you to approach our findings with caution, as correlation does not prove causation. While the findings may spark interest, further research is needed to fully understand the "spark" behind this connection.

In conclusion, our research offers a scorching revelation of the potential link between the name "Jacqueline" and arson in Washington, igniting a flame of curiosity in the academic community. Our findings set the stage for future studies to fan the flames of understanding and explore the underlying factors contributing to this fiery phenomenon.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The study of human behavior and its myriad influences can often lead researchers down unexpected paths. In the case of this research, we found ourselves delving into the unique and enigmatic correlation between the popularity of the first name Jacqueline and the occurrence of arson in the state of Washington. It's a fiery topic, to say the least!
As we set out on this investigation, we couldn't help but feel the heat of the burning curiosity surrounding this unusual connection. The fervent desire to uncover any potential links not only fueled our research but also provided ample opportunity for "hot" puns and playful wordplay. After all, what's a study on arson without a little spark of humor?
The purpose of this study was not to "fan the flames" of superstition or to ignite unnecessary alarm. Instead, we sought to approach the subject with the utmost rigor and statistical scrutiny. We were determined not to be "burned out" until we had thoroughly examined the data and stoked the flames of empirical evidence.
Delving into the records from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we were pleasantly surprised by the "fireworks" of insights that awaited us. The data from 1985 to 2022 offered a glowing opportunity to shed light on the potential association between the two variables.
It's important to note that our approach was not to "fire off" hasty conclusions, but rather to methodically analyze the data and kindle a thoughtful discussion in the academic community. At the end of the day, we believe that research should be both illuminating and engaging - not just a "flash in the pan."
As we unveil the scorching findings of this investigation, we invite our esteemed readers to approach the results with an open mind and perhaps a fire extinguisher in hand. Remember, when it comes to research, it's essential to keep a cool head while navigating the sizzling complexities of human phenomena.
In the following sections, we will elucidate our methodology, present the blistering results, and kindle a lively conversation about the potential implications of this unexpected, yet incendiary, correlation. So, grab your marshmallows and fire up your intellectual curiosity; it's about to get toasty in here!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The correlation between unusual factors and unexpected phenomena has long fascinated researchers in a variety of fields. In "Smith et al.'s study on Unconventional Correlations," the authors delve into the intriguing world of unlikely connections, highlighting the need for careful examination before jumping to conclusions. Despite the serious tone of the literature, we found ourselves unable to resist the urge to "burn" through the conventional and explore the unorthodox.

Our investigation led us to peruse works such as "The Name Book" by Dorothy Astoria, which provides extensive insights into the cultural and social significance of given names. We then delved into "The Arsonist" by Sue Miller, an enthralling novel that provided an unexpected source of inspiration for our inquiries. As we traversed between the realm of fact and fiction, we couldn't help but chuckle at the thought of an arsonist named Jacqueline, setting fires in Washington with a mischievous grin and a catchy theme song.

As we sought to approach our research with the utmost seriousness, we couldn't ignore the absurdity of our quest and the need to infuse it with a bit of lightheartedness. It was then, in a moment of unabashed curiosity, that we stumbled upon a trove of unexpected sources – including, quite surprisingly, a series of comically lengthy CVS receipts that seemed to offer cryptic clues and grocery store wisdom about the incendiary nature of names.

In "Doe's Illuminating Insights on Unconventional Data Sources," the authors highlight the need for researchers to maintain a critical eye, even in the face of the most unconventional information. We took this advice to heart as we navigated through the sea of data, veering from solemn contemplation to outright silliness.

Transitioning from the realm of humor and the unexpected, we were reminded of a classic dad joke that managed to insert itself into the scholarly dialogue. Why did the researcher bring a pencil to the arson investigation? In case they needed to draw any conclusions! This jest, while delightfully punny, also served as a reminder that amidst the serious pursuit of knowledge, there's always room for a bit of levity.

In our pursuit of knowledge, we were also charmed by "Jones' Musings on the Eccentricities of Human Behavior," where the authors muse about the unpredictable nature of humankind and the peculiarities that define us. Perhaps it is these very eccentricities that led us to embark on this fiery quest to understand the connection between a name and the flickering flames of arson in Washington.

As we return from the whimsical journey through the literature, we find ourselves back at the intersection of fact and folly, ready to present the scorching findings of our investigation. But first, let's not "fuel" any more suspense; the findings await in the next section, and they're sure to set the metaphorical research world ablaze!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jacqueline and Arson in Washington. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services . You used data from 1985 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Heat Wave: Exploring the Fiery Connection Between the Name "Jacqueline" and Arson in Washington

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to investigate the correlation between the popularity of the first name Jacqueline and the occurrence of arson in the state of Washington. This research delves into the burning question of whether there is a significant relationship between the two, aiming to set the findings ablaze in the academic community. As researchers, we were fired up to uncover any potential links and not to be "burned out" until we had exhaustively examined the data.

Using data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we painstakingly analyzed records spanning from 1985 to 2022 to ignite insights into the potential association. Our findings illuminated a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9455972 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the relationship between the popularity of the name Jacqueline and the incidence of arson in Washington is indeed hot, hot, hot!

As we were knee-deep in data analysis, we couldn't help but appreciate the fiery nature of our research topic. But let's not jump to conclusions - we ember-k you to approach our findings with caution, as correlation does not prove causation. While the findings may spark interest, further research is needed to fully understand the "spark" behind this connection.

In conclusion, our research offers a scorching revelation of the potential link between the name "Jacqueline" and arson in Washington, igniting a flame of curiosity in the academic community. Our findings set the stage for future studies to fan the flames of understanding and explore the underlying factors contributing to this fiery phenomenon.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The study of human behavior and its myriad influences can often lead researchers down unexpected paths. In the case of this research, we found ourselves delving into the unique and enigmatic correlation between the popularity of the first name Jacqueline and the occurrence of arson in the state of Washington. It's a fiery topic, to say the least!
As we set out on this investigation, we couldn't help but feel the heat of the burning curiosity surrounding this unusual connection. The fervent desire to uncover any potential links not only fueled our research but also provided ample opportunity for "hot" puns and playful wordplay. After all, what's a study on arson without a little spark of humor?
The purpose of this study was not to "fan the flames" of superstition or to ignite unnecessary alarm. Instead, we sought to approach the subject with the utmost rigor and statistical scrutiny. We were determined not to be "burned out" until we had thoroughly examined the data and stoked the flames of empirical evidence.
Delving into the records from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we were pleasantly surprised by the "fireworks" of insights that awaited us. The data from 1985 to 2022 offered a glowing opportunity to shed light on the potential association between the two variables.
It's important to note that our approach was not to "fire off" hasty conclusions, but rather to methodically analyze the data and kindle a thoughtful discussion in the academic community. At the end of the day, we believe that research should be both illuminating and engaging - not just a "flash in the pan."
As we unveil the scorching findings of this investigation, we invite our esteemed readers to approach the results with an open mind and perhaps a fire extinguisher in hand. Remember, when it comes to research, it's essential to keep a cool head while navigating the sizzling complexities of human phenomena.
In the following sections, we will elucidate our methodology, present the blistering results, and kindle a lively conversation about the potential implications of this unexpected, yet incendiary, correlation. So, grab your marshmallows and fire up your intellectual curiosity; it's about to get toasty in here!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the burning question of the potential correlation between the popularity of the first name Jacqueline and the occurrence of arson in the state of Washington, our research team embarked on a fiery adventure in data collection and analysis. Our methodology, akin to a well-tempered forge, was designed to diligently sift through the data and culminate in findings that are not just "smoke and mirrors."

First and foremost, we scoured through the troves of data available from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services. We dived into the depths of these datasets, ensuring that our approach left no stone unturned and no ember unexamined. After all, we didn't want our findings to go up in smoke due to incomplete data!

With the raw data in hand, we stoked the flames of statistical analysis using a method that could withstand the hottest of scrutiny. Employing a complex blend of regression analysis, time series models, and fiery algorithms, we sought to uncover any sparks of correlation between the popularity of the name Jacqueline and instances of arson in the Evergreen State.

In the spirit of comprehensive investigation, we unleashed the power of machine learning to scorch through the data and reveal any underlying patterns or associations. This approach, akin to a well-tended bonfire, allowed us to cast a wide net and capture any flicker of connection between the variables under examination.

As we fanned the flames of analysis, we meticulously controlled for confounding variables, ensuring that our findings were not merely a flash in the pan. Factors such as population density, socioeconomic status, and even the prevalence of firework displays were carefully considered and incorporated into our inferno of statistical models.

Furthermore, we adopted a multidisciplinary approach, engaging in spirited discussions with experts in fields ranging from psychology to demography. Their invaluable insights added fuel to our scholarly fire, enriching the depth and scope of our investigation.

Finally, we utilized advanced visualization techniques to ignite a captivating portrayal of the data, allowing readers to witness the sizzle of the correlations and the flicker of trends emerge as if they were witnessing a grand firework display. These visual representations served as beacons of understanding, guiding our audience through the fiery labyrinth of our findings.

With our comprehensive methodology burning bright, we kindle the flames of anticipation for the scorching results that follow. Stay tuned as we present the fervent findings of our investigation and "spark" a spirited conversation in the academic community. Thank you for igniting your interest in our incendiary research!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jacqueline and Arson in Washington. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services .

For the time period 1985 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9455972, r-squared of 0.8941541, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Heat Wave: Exploring the Fiery Connection Between the Name "Jacqueline" and Arson in Washington

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to investigate the correlation between the popularity of the first name Jacqueline and the occurrence of arson in the state of Washington. This research delves into the burning question of whether there is a significant relationship between the two, aiming to set the findings ablaze in the academic community. As researchers, we were fired up to uncover any potential links and not to be "burned out" until we had exhaustively examined the data.

Using data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we painstakingly analyzed records spanning from 1985 to 2022 to ignite insights into the potential association. Our findings illuminated a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9455972 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the relationship between the popularity of the name Jacqueline and the incidence of arson in Washington is indeed hot, hot, hot!

As we were knee-deep in data analysis, we couldn't help but appreciate the fiery nature of our research topic. But let's not jump to conclusions - we ember-k you to approach our findings with caution, as correlation does not prove causation. While the findings may spark interest, further research is needed to fully understand the "spark" behind this connection.

In conclusion, our research offers a scorching revelation of the potential link between the name "Jacqueline" and arson in Washington, igniting a flame of curiosity in the academic community. Our findings set the stage for future studies to fan the flames of understanding and explore the underlying factors contributing to this fiery phenomenon.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The study of human behavior and its myriad influences can often lead researchers down unexpected paths. In the case of this research, we found ourselves delving into the unique and enigmatic correlation between the popularity of the first name Jacqueline and the occurrence of arson in the state of Washington. It's a fiery topic, to say the least!
As we set out on this investigation, we couldn't help but feel the heat of the burning curiosity surrounding this unusual connection. The fervent desire to uncover any potential links not only fueled our research but also provided ample opportunity for "hot" puns and playful wordplay. After all, what's a study on arson without a little spark of humor?
The purpose of this study was not to "fan the flames" of superstition or to ignite unnecessary alarm. Instead, we sought to approach the subject with the utmost rigor and statistical scrutiny. We were determined not to be "burned out" until we had thoroughly examined the data and stoked the flames of empirical evidence.
Delving into the records from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we were pleasantly surprised by the "fireworks" of insights that awaited us. The data from 1985 to 2022 offered a glowing opportunity to shed light on the potential association between the two variables.
It's important to note that our approach was not to "fire off" hasty conclusions, but rather to methodically analyze the data and kindle a thoughtful discussion in the academic community. At the end of the day, we believe that research should be both illuminating and engaging - not just a "flash in the pan."
As we unveil the scorching findings of this investigation, we invite our esteemed readers to approach the results with an open mind and perhaps a fire extinguisher in hand. Remember, when it comes to research, it's essential to keep a cool head while navigating the sizzling complexities of human phenomena.
In the following sections, we will elucidate our methodology, present the blistering results, and kindle a lively conversation about the potential implications of this unexpected, yet incendiary, correlation. So, grab your marshmallows and fire up your intellectual curiosity; it's about to get toasty in here!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis of the relationship between the popularity of the first name Jacqueline and the incidence of arson in Washington yielded scorching results. The correlation coefficient of 0.9455972 highlighted a remarkably strong positive association, with an r-squared value of 0.8941541 indicating that approximately 89.41% of the variation in arson can be explained by the popularity of the name Jacqueline. These findings certainly "heat up" the debate on whether there is a meaningful link between the two variables.

Now, let's "set the data on fire" with a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a statistically significant relationship between the variables. With a result this hot, it's no wonder we're all fired up about these findings.

Additionally, our statistical analysis unveiled a noticeable trend in our scatterplot (Fig. 1) that further illuminated the strong positive relationship between the two variables. The plot showcases a steep incline, akin to the rise in temperature during a summertime barbecue – a fitting visual representation of the "fiery" connection between the popularity of the name Jacqueline and arson in Washington.

It's important to "put out any misunderstandings" by reminding readers that correlation does not imply causation. While our findings suggest a striking association, it's critical to approach them with caution and not jump to conclusions. This is like the age-old advice for avoiding a burn – "look, but don't touch" until further research can fully illuminate the "spark" behind this connection.

In conclusion, our scorching results provide compelling evidence of the unexpected correlation between the name "Jacqueline" and arson in Washington. This research ignites a flame of curiosity and calls for further investigation to unravel the underlying factors behind this blazing phenomenon. After all, it's not every day that a study sets the academic world ablaze with such an unexpected, yet fascinating, correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jacqueline and Arson in Washington. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Heat Wave: Exploring the Fiery Connection Between the Name "Jacqueline" and Arson in Washington

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to investigate the correlation between the popularity of the first name Jacqueline and the occurrence of arson in the state of Washington. This research delves into the burning question of whether there is a significant relationship between the two, aiming to set the findings ablaze in the academic community. As researchers, we were fired up to uncover any potential links and not to be "burned out" until we had exhaustively examined the data.

Using data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we painstakingly analyzed records spanning from 1985 to 2022 to ignite insights into the potential association. Our findings illuminated a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9455972 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the relationship between the popularity of the name Jacqueline and the incidence of arson in Washington is indeed hot, hot, hot!

As we were knee-deep in data analysis, we couldn't help but appreciate the fiery nature of our research topic. But let's not jump to conclusions - we ember-k you to approach our findings with caution, as correlation does not prove causation. While the findings may spark interest, further research is needed to fully understand the "spark" behind this connection.

In conclusion, our research offers a scorching revelation of the potential link between the name "Jacqueline" and arson in Washington, igniting a flame of curiosity in the academic community. Our findings set the stage for future studies to fan the flames of understanding and explore the underlying factors contributing to this fiery phenomenon.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The correlation between unusual factors and unexpected phenomena has long fascinated researchers in a variety of fields. In "Smith et al.'s study on Unconventional Correlations," the authors delve into the intriguing world of unlikely connections, highlighting the need for careful examination before jumping to conclusions. Despite the serious tone of the literature, we found ourselves unable to resist the urge to "burn" through the conventional and explore the unorthodox.
Our investigation led us to peruse works such as "The Name Book" by Dorothy Astoria, which provides extensive insights into the cultural and social significance of given names. We then delved into "The Arsonist" by Sue Miller, an enthralling novel that provided an unexpected source of inspiration for our inquiries. As we traversed between the realm of fact and fiction, we couldn't help but chuckle at the thought of an arsonist named Jacqueline, setting fires in Washington with a mischievous grin and a catchy theme song.
As we sought to approach our research with the utmost seriousness, we couldn't ignore the absurdity of our quest and the need to infuse it with a bit of lightheartedness. It was then, in a moment of unabashed curiosity, that we stumbled upon a trove of unexpected sources – including, quite surprisingly, a series of comically lengthy CVS receipts that seemed to offer cryptic clues and grocery store wisdom about the incendiary nature of names.
In "Doe's Illuminating Insights on Unconventional Data Sources," the authors highlight the need for researchers to maintain a critical eye, even in the face of the most unconventional information. We took this advice to heart as we navigated through the sea of data, veering from solemn contemplation to outright silliness.
Transitioning from the realm of humor and the unexpected, we were reminded of a classic dad joke that managed to insert itself into the scholarly dialogue. Why did the researcher bring a pencil to the arson investigation? In case they needed to draw any conclusions! This jest, while delightfully punny, also served as a reminder that amidst the serious pursuit of knowledge, there's always room for a bit of levity.
In our pursuit of knowledge, we were also charmed by "Jones' Musings on the Eccentricities of Human Behavior," where the authors muse about the unpredictable nature of humankind and the peculiarities that define us. Perhaps it is these very eccentricities that led us to embark on this fiery quest to understand the connection between a name and the flickering flames of arson in Washington.
As we return from the whimsical journey through the literature, we find ourselves back at the intersection of fact and folly, ready to present the scorching findings of our investigation. But first, let's not "fuel" any more suspense; the findings await in the next section, and they're sure to set the metaphorical research world ablaze!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between the popularity of the first name Jacqueline and the incidence of arson in Washington yielded scorching results. The correlation coefficient of 0.9455972 highlighted a remarkably strong positive association, with an r-squared value of 0.8941541 indicating that approximately 89.41% of the variation in arson can be explained by the popularity of the name Jacqueline. These findings certainly "heat up" the debate on whether there is a meaningful link between the two variables.
Now, let's "set the data on fire" with a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a statistically significant relationship between the variables. With a result this hot, it's no wonder we're all fired up about these findings.
Additionally, our statistical analysis unveiled a noticeable trend in our scatterplot (Fig. 1) that further illuminated the strong positive relationship between the two variables. The plot showcases a steep incline, akin to the rise in temperature during a summertime barbecue – a fitting visual representation of the "fiery" connection between the popularity of the name Jacqueline and arson in Washington.
It's important to "put out any misunderstandings" by reminding readers that correlation does not imply causation. While our findings suggest a striking association, it's critical to approach them with caution and not jump to conclusions. This is like the age-old advice for avoiding a burn – "look, but don't touch" until further research can fully illuminate the "spark" behind this connection.
In conclusion, our scorching results provide compelling evidence of the unexpected correlation between the name "Jacqueline" and arson in Washington. This research ignites a flame of curiosity and calls for further investigation to unravel the underlying factors behind this blazing phenomenon. After all, it's not every day that a study sets the academic world ablaze with such an unexpected, yet fascinating, correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our scorching findings have set the stage for a fiery discussion on the unexpected correlation between the name "Jacqueline" and the incidence of arson in the state of Washington. These results have certainly stoked the flames of curiosity, igniting a burning desire to unravel the underlying factors contributing to this striking relationship.

The strong positive association between the popularity of the name Jacqueline and the incidence of arson in Washington, as evidenced by the correlation coefficient of 0.9455972 and a p-value of less than 0.01, is nothing short of a "firework" in the realm of unusual correlations. This revelation is akin to finding a "match" in the haystack of unexpected research connections – it's both illuminating and surprising at the same time.

Our results find support in prior research, such as "Smith et al.'s study on Unconventional Correlations," which emphasized the need for in-depth examination of unlikely connections. While the correlation between a name and arson may initially seem improbable, our findings have burned through any skepticism, offering empirical evidence to support this fiery relationship.

Drawing inspiration from "The Name Book" by Dorothy Astoria and "The Arsonist" by Sue Miller, our investigation sought to bridge the realms of cultural significance and criminal behavior, and we were not disappointed. As we "fanned the flames" of exploration, it's clear that the quirkiness and unexpected sources we encountered in our literature review played a pivotal role in uncovering this scorching connection.

In our analysis, the scatterplot (Fig. 1) served as a visual representation of the sizzling relationship between the popularity of the name Jacqueline and arson in Washington. The steep incline mirrored the rise in temperature during a summer barbecue, providing a fitting depiction of the "heated" association between the two variables.

It's crucial to approach our scorching findings with caution, as correlation does not prove causation. As we navigate through the embers of this unexpected correlation, it's essential to resist the temptation to hastily draw conclusions, much like bringing a pencil to an arson investigation – in case we need to "sketchy" out any misconceptions.

In the lighthearted spirit of our literature review, let's not "fan the flames" of speculation any further without conducting diligent follow-up research to truly understand the "spark" behind this unexpected relationship. This cautionary approach aligns with the sage advice – "don't play with fire" – as we proceed to unravel the enigmatic link between the name "Jacqueline" and arson in Washington.

As our research blazes a trail of inquiry into the unexpected, yet riveting, correlation between a name and criminal behavior, we usher in a new era of exploration into the complexities of human behavior. Our findings not only ignite a flame of curiosity in the academic community but also inspire further investigations to "put out" misconceptions and shed light on the potentially incendiary nature of names.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Jacqueline and Arson in Washington. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Heat Wave: Exploring the Fiery Connection Between the Name "Jacqueline" and Arson in Washington

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we set out to investigate the correlation between the popularity of the first name Jacqueline and the occurrence of arson in the state of Washington. This research delves into the burning question of whether there is a significant relationship between the two, aiming to set the findings ablaze in the academic community. As researchers, we were fired up to uncover any potential links and not to be "burned out" until we had exhaustively examined the data.

Using data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we painstakingly analyzed records spanning from 1985 to 2022 to ignite insights into the potential association. Our findings illuminated a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9455972 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the relationship between the popularity of the name Jacqueline and the incidence of arson in Washington is indeed hot, hot, hot!

As we were knee-deep in data analysis, we couldn't help but appreciate the fiery nature of our research topic. But let's not jump to conclusions - we ember-k you to approach our findings with caution, as correlation does not prove causation. While the findings may spark interest, further research is needed to fully understand the "spark" behind this connection.

In conclusion, our research offers a scorching revelation of the potential link between the name "Jacqueline" and arson in Washington, igniting a flame of curiosity in the academic community. Our findings set the stage for future studies to fan the flames of understanding and explore the underlying factors contributing to this fiery phenomenon.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The study of human behavior and its myriad influences can often lead researchers down unexpected paths. In the case of this research, we found ourselves delving into the unique and enigmatic correlation between the popularity of the first name Jacqueline and the occurrence of arson in the state of Washington. It's a fiery topic, to say the least!
As we set out on this investigation, we couldn't help but feel the heat of the burning curiosity surrounding this unusual connection. The fervent desire to uncover any potential links not only fueled our research but also provided ample opportunity for "hot" puns and playful wordplay. After all, what's a study on arson without a little spark of humor?
The purpose of this study was not to "fan the flames" of superstition or to ignite unnecessary alarm. Instead, we sought to approach the subject with the utmost rigor and statistical scrutiny. We were determined not to be "burned out" until we had thoroughly examined the data and stoked the flames of empirical evidence.
Delving into the records from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we were pleasantly surprised by the "fireworks" of insights that awaited us. The data from 1985 to 2022 offered a glowing opportunity to shed light on the potential association between the two variables.
It's important to note that our approach was not to "fire off" hasty conclusions, but rather to methodically analyze the data and kindle a thoughtful discussion in the academic community. At the end of the day, we believe that research should be both illuminating and engaging - not just a "flash in the pan."
As we unveil the scorching findings of this investigation, we invite our esteemed readers to approach the results with an open mind and perhaps a fire extinguisher in hand. Remember, when it comes to research, it's essential to keep a cool head while navigating the sizzling complexities of human phenomena.
In the following sections, we will elucidate our methodology, present the blistering results, and kindle a lively conversation about the potential implications of this unexpected, yet incendiary, correlation. So, grab your marshmallows and fire up your intellectual curiosity; it's about to get toasty in here!

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis of the relationship between the popularity of the first name Jacqueline and the incidence of arson in Washington yielded scorching results. The correlation coefficient of 0.9455972 highlighted a remarkably strong positive association, with an r-squared value of 0.8941541 indicating that approximately 89.41% of the variation in arson can be explained by the popularity of the name Jacqueline. These findings certainly "heat up" the debate on whether there is a meaningful link between the two variables.
Now, let's "set the data on fire" with a p-value of less than 0.01, signifying a statistically significant relationship between the variables. With a result this hot, it's no wonder we're all fired up about these findings.
Additionally, our statistical analysis unveiled a noticeable trend in our scatterplot (Fig. 1) that further illuminated the strong positive relationship between the two variables. The plot showcases a steep incline, akin to the rise in temperature during a summertime barbecue – a fitting visual representation of the "fiery" connection between the popularity of the name Jacqueline and arson in Washington.
It's important to "put out any misunderstandings" by reminding readers that correlation does not imply causation. While our findings suggest a striking association, it's critical to approach them with caution and not jump to conclusions. This is like the age-old advice for avoiding a burn – "look, but don't touch" until further research can fully illuminate the "spark" behind this connection.
In conclusion, our scorching results provide compelling evidence of the unexpected correlation between the name "Jacqueline" and arson in Washington. This research ignites a flame of curiosity and calls for further investigation to unravel the underlying factors behind this blazing phenomenon. After all, it's not every day that a study sets the academic world ablaze with such an unexpected, yet fascinating, correlation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has uncorked a bottle of fiery fascination, shedding light on the unexpectedly robust correlation between the popularity of the first name Jacqueline and the incidence of arson in Washington. This incendiary connection has certainly sparked both curiosity and amusement in the academic community. It seems the name "Jacqueline" isn't just "hot" in terms of popularity!

Just as a wood stove can warm a house or burn it down, our findings hint at a sizzling relationship between the name and arson. However, as we tread carefully through the embers of data analysis, it's important to keep a cool head and remember that correlation does not equal causation. After all, we wouldn't want to "fan the flames" of unwarranted assumptions.

These results have offered a toast-worthy opportunity to delve into a truly "hot" topic, but it's time to extinguish any lingering doubts. With such scorching statistical evidence, it's clear that further research may only serve to "overcook" this already well-done finding. It's like trying to reheat a burnt marshmallow - sometimes, it's best to enjoy it as is!

Regarding the potential connection between the name "Jacqueline" and arson in Washington, we dare say that our research has provided a "smoking" hot revelation, and it's high time to turn down the heat on this line of inquiry. The match has been lit and the spark has been seen, so let's not "fuel the fire" any further. It's like a dad joke at a barbecue - it's best to leave the guests wanting s'more and not force another one!

Therefore, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. It's time to douse the flames of speculation and move on to explore cooler, less "heated" research avenues. After all, there are plenty of other sizzling topics waiting for our scholarly attention!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Heat Wave: Exploring the Fiery Connection Between the Name Jacqueline and Arson in Washington. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Fire Behavior and Personality Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Heat Wave: Exploring the Fiery Connection Between the Name Jacqueline and Arson in Washington. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Quirky Phenomena Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Heat Wave: Exploring the Fiery Connection Between the Name Jacqueline and Arson in Washington with an abstract of In this study, we set out to investigate the correlation between the popularity of the first name Jacqueline and the occurrence of arson in the state of Washington. This research delves into the burning question of whether there is a significant relationship between the two, aiming to set the findings ablaze in the academic community. As researchers, we were fired up to uncover any potential links and not to be "burned out" until we had exhaustively examined the data.
Using data from the US Social Security Administration and FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, we painstakingly analyzed records spanning from 1985 to 2022 to ignite insights into the potential association. Our findings illuminated a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9455972 and a p-value of less than 0.01, indicating that the relationship between the popularity of the name Jacqueline and the incidence of arson in Washington is indeed hot, hot, hot!
As we were knee-deep in data analysis, we couldn't help but appreciate the fiery nature of our research topic. But let's not jump to conclusions - we ember-k you to approach our findings with caution, as correlation does not prove causation. While the findings may spark interest, further research is needed to fully understand the "spark" behind this connection.
In conclusion, our research offers a scorching revelation of the potential link between the name "Jacqueline" and arson in Washington, igniting a flame of curiosity in the academic community. Our findings set the stage for future studies to fan the flames of understanding and explore the underlying factors contributing to this fiery phenomenon.

ChatGPT:

"Jacqueline name popularity," "arson in Washington," "correlation coefficient," "FBI Criminal Justice Information Services," "US Social Security Administration data," "name and arson correlation," "causation vs correlation," "name trends and crime statistics," "research on name and crime correlation," "impact of name on criminal behavior."

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Jacqueline
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Jacqueline
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Jacqueline

Arson in Washington
Detailed data title: The arson rate per 100,000 residents in Washington
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Arson in Washington

Correlation r = 0.9455972 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8941541 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 89.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Arson in Washington) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Jacqueline) over the 38 years from 1985 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.9E-19. 0.0000000000000000003871315759
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 3.9E-17% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,583,101,101,157,168,640 random variables You don't actually need 2 quintillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 37 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 37 because we have two variables measured over a period of 38 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.9, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
19851986198719881989199019911992199319941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Jacqueline (Babies born)52795071565955765484526850054706453552024805487942933506391150494312375834083075286128672629226919671808156013201336130912321134927941816695659624
Arson in Washington (Arson rate)40.841.547.840.137.23740.5463745.139.63635.138.334.336.334.534.234.934.432.533.229.424.623.620.319.318.516.116.717.715.515.114.712.917.620.819.6




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([5279,5071,5659,5576,5484,5268,5005,4706,4535,5202,4805,4879,4293,3506,3911,5049,4312,3758,3408,3075,2861,2867,2629,2269,1967,1808,1560,1320,1336,1309,1232,1134,927,941,816,695,659,624,])
array_2 = np.array([40.8,41.5,47.8,40.1,37.2,37,40.5,46,37,45.1,39.6,36,35.1,38.3,34.3,36.3,34.5,34.2,34.9,34.4,32.5,33.2,29.4,24.6,23.6,20.3,19.3,18.5,16.1,16.7,17.7,15.5,15.1,14.7,12.9,17.6,20.8,19.6,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Jacqueline"
array_2_name = "Arson in Washington"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Bravo! Your evaluation rocks!


Correlation ID: 2922 · Black Variable ID: 2126 · Red Variable ID: 20074
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0