about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,904 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and the second variable is Professor salaries in the US.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the paper goods industry in Kentucky dwindled, there was a surprising ripple effect on the academic world. With fewer machine operators, there was a decrease in the production of paper, leading to a shortage. This paper shortage then drove up the prices of academic resources, such as journals and textbooks. As universities faced higher costs, they had to make budget cuts, including the salaries of professors. Who knew that the path to higher pay for professors was... paper thin.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: "Incorporate elements of cybernetic art while visualizing the transition of former paper goods workers to professors at a bustling college campus. Capture the stark contrast between a quiet, vacant factory in Kentucky and the vibrant energy of the campus. Emphasize the futuristic integration of human and technological aspects as the transition unfolds. Highlight the workers' enthusiastic embrace of their new roles against a backdrop of cybernetic and technological elements interacting with the traditional campus setting." The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and Professor salaries in the US. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Surrealism Cybernetic art Symbolism Magic realism Cyber folk
ChatGPT: Cybernetic art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and Professor salaries in the US, in the following situation: Professor salaries in the US increased as the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky decreased. This is because as the demand for toilet paper and paper towels plummeted in Kentucky, those workers sought higher education and became professors, driving up their salaries.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Kentucky, the once bustling paper goods machine factory has slowed down. The number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders has dwindled, as fewer workers are needed due to decreased demand for toilet paper and paper towels. At the same time, across the US, professors are experiencing a boom in salaries. In this visual scene, we see former paper goods workers transitioning into a vibrant college campus, taking on new roles as professors. The campus is bustling with energy as they passionately share their newfound knowledge. The contrast is stark - the quiet, vacant factory in Kentucky against the lively campus, symbolizing the shift of workers to higher education.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cybernetic art ] and depicting this scene: In Kentucky, the once bustling paper goods machine factory has slowed down. The number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders has dwindled, as fewer workers are needed due to decreased demand for toilet paper and paper towels. At the same time, across the US, professors are experiencing a boom in salaries. In this visual scene, we see former paper goods workers transitioning into a vibrant college campus, taking on new roles as professors. The campus is bustling with energy as they passionately share their newfound knowledge. The contrast is stark - the quiet, vacant factory in Kentucky against the lively campus, symbolizing the shift of workers to higher education. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: "Incorporate elements of cybernetic art while visualizing the transition of former paper goods workers to professors at a bustling college campus. Capture the stark contrast between a quiet, vacant factory in Kentucky and the vibrant energy of the campus. Emphasize the futuristic integration of human and technological aspects as the transition unfolds. Highlight the workers' enthusiastic embrace of their new roles against a backdrop of cybernetic and technological elements interacting with the traditional campus setting."

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky caused Professor salaries in the US to decrease. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Wall Street Wages and Paper Trades: Unraveling the Roll Between Paper Goods Machine Setters in Kentucky and Professor Salaries Across the US

The Journal of Quirky Economic Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and Professor salaries in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and National Center for Education Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9476108 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Wall Street Wages and Paper Trades: Unraveling the Roll Between Paper Goods Machine Setters in Kentucky and Professor Salaries Across the US"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the improbable connection between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in the bluegrass state of Kentucky and the enigmatic yet glamorous world of professor salaries in the United States. Employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics, we tirelessly worked on unrolling the complexities of this relationship.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9476108 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning from 2009 to 2021, suggesting a surprisingly strong link between these seemingly unrelated occupations. It seems that behind the scenes, the paper goods industry and academia share a bond that's tearable to resist! For each significant interaction, one might say there's a "sheet" amount of evidence to support this intriguing association.

Furthermore, our study sheds light on the oft-overlooked impact of paper goods machine setters, who, much like the unnoticed glue that holds together reams of paper, play an integral role in shaping the labor landscape. As the old saying goes, "When it comes to labor trends, don't just brush it off—take note and 'reem' in the data!"

Ultimately, our research not only underscores the unexpected interconnectedness between these vocations but also invites further examination into the fabric of seemingly incongruous professional domains. After all, as researchers, it's our duty to unravel the paper trail, even if it leads to unexpected puns!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and Professor salaries in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Wall Street Wages and Paper Trades: Unraveling the Roll Between Paper Goods Machine Setters in Kentucky and Professor Salaries Across the US"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the improbable connection between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in the bluegrass state of Kentucky and the enigmatic yet glamorous world of professor salaries in the United States. Employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics, we tirelessly worked on unrolling the complexities of this relationship.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9476108 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning from 2009 to 2021, suggesting a surprisingly strong link between these seemingly unrelated occupations. It seems that behind the scenes, the paper goods industry and academia share a bond that's tearable to resist! For each significant interaction, one might say there's a "sheet" amount of evidence to support this intriguing association.

Furthermore, our study sheds light on the oft-overlooked impact of paper goods machine setters, who, much like the unnoticed glue that holds together reams of paper, play an integral role in shaping the labor landscape. As the old saying goes, "When it comes to labor trends, don't just brush it off—take note and 'reem' in the data!"

Ultimately, our research not only underscores the unexpected interconnectedness between these vocations but also invites further examination into the fabric of seemingly incongruous professional domains. After all, as researchers, it's our duty to unravel the paper trail, even if it leads to unexpected puns!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The correlation between different occupations and salaries has long been a topic of interest in labor economics. In this study, we explore the unexpected link between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and professor salaries across the United States. This connection, while seemingly unrelated on the surface, has proven to be more than just pulp fiction.

It appears that there is a certain "thickness" to the relationship between the number of paper goods machine setters in Kentucky and the salaries of professors nationwide. Our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.9476108 (p < 0.01) over the period from 2009 to 2021, indicating a strikingly strong connection between these seemingly disparate roles. It seems that when it comes to labor trends, the paper trail leads to unexpected places, much like when you accidentally unravel an entire roll of toilet paper in one go.

The paper goods industry often flies under the radar, much like a paper airplane in a room full of books. However, our research has uncovered the significant impact of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders, who act as the unsung heroes behind the scenes, much like the invisible force holding together a well-crafted origami masterpiece. One might even say that they "fold" into the fabric of the labor market.

Furthermore, the discernible link between these occupations invites further exploration and scrutiny. Just as an unfurled scroll reveals its intricate contents, we are called to unravel the intertwined nature of these seemingly unrelated professional realms. And who better to do this than a team of researchers willing to "roll" up their sleeves and face the challenge head-on?

In the world of labor economics, it's essential to uncover unexpected connections and consider the hidden influences shaping labor dynamics. As the saying goes, "A good researcher is like a skilled paper goods machine tender, carefully aligning each piece to create meaningful insights."

Stay tuned as we untangle the intertwined web of paper goods and professor salaries, and perhaps discover more unexpected puns along the way!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and Professor salaries in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Wall Street Wages and Paper Trades: Unraveling the Roll Between Paper Goods Machine Setters in Kentucky and Professor Salaries Across the US"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the improbable connection between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in the bluegrass state of Kentucky and the enigmatic yet glamorous world of professor salaries in the United States. Employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics, we tirelessly worked on unrolling the complexities of this relationship.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9476108 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning from 2009 to 2021, suggesting a surprisingly strong link between these seemingly unrelated occupations. It seems that behind the scenes, the paper goods industry and academia share a bond that's tearable to resist! For each significant interaction, one might say there's a "sheet" amount of evidence to support this intriguing association.

Furthermore, our study sheds light on the oft-overlooked impact of paper goods machine setters, who, much like the unnoticed glue that holds together reams of paper, play an integral role in shaping the labor landscape. As the old saying goes, "When it comes to labor trends, don't just brush it off—take note and 'reem' in the data!"

Ultimately, our research not only underscores the unexpected interconnectedness between these vocations but also invites further examination into the fabric of seemingly incongruous professional domains. After all, as researchers, it's our duty to unravel the paper trail, even if it leads to unexpected puns!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The correlation between different occupations and salaries has long been a topic of interest in labor economics. In this study, we explore the unexpected link between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and professor salaries across the United States. This connection, while seemingly unrelated on the surface, has proven to be more than just pulp fiction.
It appears that there is a certain "thickness" to the relationship between the number of paper goods machine setters in Kentucky and the salaries of professors nationwide. Our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.9476108 (p < 0.01) over the period from 2009 to 2021, indicating a strikingly strong connection between these seemingly disparate roles. It seems that when it comes to labor trends, the paper trail leads to unexpected places, much like when you accidentally unravel an entire roll of toilet paper in one go.
The paper goods industry often flies under the radar, much like a paper airplane in a room full of books. However, our research has uncovered the significant impact of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders, who act as the unsung heroes behind the scenes, much like the invisible force holding together a well-crafted origami masterpiece. One might even say that they "fold" into the fabric of the labor market.
Furthermore, the discernible link between these occupations invites further exploration and scrutiny. Just as an unfurled scroll reveals its intricate contents, we are called to unravel the intertwined nature of these seemingly unrelated professional realms. And who better to do this than a team of researchers willing to "roll" up their sleeves and face the challenge head-on?
In the world of labor economics, it's essential to uncover unexpected connections and consider the hidden influences shaping labor dynamics. As the saying goes, "A good researcher is like a skilled paper goods machine tender, carefully aligning each piece to create meaningful insights."
Stay tuned as we untangle the intertwined web of paper goods and professor salaries, and perhaps discover more unexpected puns along the way!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between seemingly unrelated occupations and their influence on each other has long captivated the minds of labor economists and scholars alike. As expected, a slew of academic studies such as Smith and Doe's "Economic Forces at Play" and Jones' "Labor Interdependencies" have shed light on these connections. However, the unexpected association between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and professor salaries across the United States is truly a revelation that has the potential to "unroll" more than just paper goods.

In "Economic Forces at Play," Smith and Doe delve into the interconnectedness of various industries, highlighting how factors in one sector can have ripple effects in others. This is quite fitting, as our study unravels the interconnected relationship between the paper goods industry and academia, demonstrating how one occupation can crease its influence on another.

Furthermore, Jones' "Labor Interdependencies" offers valuable insights into the intricate web of occupations and their impact on the labor landscape. Our study adds a quirky twist to this concept by unraveling the unexpected bond between paper goods machine setters in the Bluegrass State and professor salaries nationwide. It seems that the labor market is a lot like a folded piece of origami paper - you never know what surprising shape it might take!

As we move beyond the world of traditional labor economics literature, it is essential to consider the influence of non-fiction reads on our understanding of labor dynamics. Works such as "Nickel and Dimed" by Barbara Ehrenreich and "The Working Poor" by David K. Shipler provide a poignant look at the struggles of low-wage workers, highlighting the importance of understanding the underappreciated roles in various industries. Speaking of underappreciated roles, have you heard the one about the paper goods machine setter who always got overlooked? He was a real un-cutter-stood worker!

In exploring the intersection between seemingly unrelated occupations, one cannot overlook the impact of fiction literature on shaping our understanding of professional domains. The classic novel "The Paper Magician" by Charlie N. Holmberg may not directly address the nexus between paper goods machine setters and professor salaries, but it certainly adds a whimsical touch to our exploration. After all, who wouldn't want to dive into a world where paper has magical properties, much like the surprising influence of paper goods machine setters on professor salaries?

Moving away from traditional literature, it is vital to acknowledge the unexpected sources of insight that have shaped our understanding of labor dynamics. While conducting this research, we couldn't help but draw inspiration from popular cartoons and children's shows. Take, for example, "SpongeBob SquarePants," which showcases the diverse range of occupations in Bikini Bottom. It's as if the creators of the show were trying to tell us that even the most unassuming professions, such as "manually inflating a balloon at a sporting event," can have an impact, much like the role of paper goods machine setters in the labor market. And speaking of SpongeBob, did you hear about the Sponge who got a job at the paper goods factory? His boss told him he had to shape up or ship out, but all he wanted to do was absorb all the knowledge!

In unpacking the interplay between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and professor salaries across the United States, it's essential to embrace unexpected sources of insight. As we roll out the findings of our study, it becomes clear that even the quirkiest connections can yield valuable insights, and perhaps a few unexpected puns along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and Professor salaries in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and National Center for Education Statistics . You used data from 2009 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Wall Street Wages and Paper Trades: Unraveling the Roll Between Paper Goods Machine Setters in Kentucky and Professor Salaries Across the US"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the improbable connection between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in the bluegrass state of Kentucky and the enigmatic yet glamorous world of professor salaries in the United States. Employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics, we tirelessly worked on unrolling the complexities of this relationship.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9476108 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning from 2009 to 2021, suggesting a surprisingly strong link between these seemingly unrelated occupations. It seems that behind the scenes, the paper goods industry and academia share a bond that's tearable to resist! For each significant interaction, one might say there's a "sheet" amount of evidence to support this intriguing association.

Furthermore, our study sheds light on the oft-overlooked impact of paper goods machine setters, who, much like the unnoticed glue that holds together reams of paper, play an integral role in shaping the labor landscape. As the old saying goes, "When it comes to labor trends, don't just brush it off—take note and 'reem' in the data!"

Ultimately, our research not only underscores the unexpected interconnectedness between these vocations but also invites further examination into the fabric of seemingly incongruous professional domains. After all, as researchers, it's our duty to unravel the paper trail, even if it leads to unexpected puns!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The correlation between different occupations and salaries has long been a topic of interest in labor economics. In this study, we explore the unexpected link between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and professor salaries across the United States. This connection, while seemingly unrelated on the surface, has proven to be more than just pulp fiction.
It appears that there is a certain "thickness" to the relationship between the number of paper goods machine setters in Kentucky and the salaries of professors nationwide. Our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.9476108 (p < 0.01) over the period from 2009 to 2021, indicating a strikingly strong connection between these seemingly disparate roles. It seems that when it comes to labor trends, the paper trail leads to unexpected places, much like when you accidentally unravel an entire roll of toilet paper in one go.
The paper goods industry often flies under the radar, much like a paper airplane in a room full of books. However, our research has uncovered the significant impact of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders, who act as the unsung heroes behind the scenes, much like the invisible force holding together a well-crafted origami masterpiece. One might even say that they "fold" into the fabric of the labor market.
Furthermore, the discernible link between these occupations invites further exploration and scrutiny. Just as an unfurled scroll reveals its intricate contents, we are called to unravel the intertwined nature of these seemingly unrelated professional realms. And who better to do this than a team of researchers willing to "roll" up their sleeves and face the challenge head-on?
In the world of labor economics, it's essential to uncover unexpected connections and consider the hidden influences shaping labor dynamics. As the saying goes, "A good researcher is like a skilled paper goods machine tender, carefully aligning each piece to create meaningful insights."
Stay tuned as we untangle the intertwined web of paper goods and professor salaries, and perhaps discover more unexpected puns along the way!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To decipher the enigmatic link between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and professor salaries across the United States, our research team meticulously embarked on a journey of data collection and analysis. In a bid to uncover this unlikely connection, we employed a delightfully convoluted methodological approach that would make even the most seasoned statistician raise an eyebrow or perhaps crack a wry smile.

First, we scoured the vast expanse of the internet, navigating through the digital underbrush like intrepid explorers in search of the elusive treasure trove of labor statistics. We traversed the virtual realm, pausing every so often to ponder the peculiarities of our task, akin to intrepid adventurers seeking buried treasure, albeit with more computer screens and less swashbuckling.

After what seemed like an eternity lost in the labyrinth of cyberspace, we emerged with a wealth of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics. These reputable sources provided us with the raw materials necessary to unfurl the tapestry of connections between paper goods machine setters and professor salaries, much like unrolling a spool of parchment to reveal the secrets hidden within.

Next, we harnessed the power of statistical software and employed a series of robust econometric models to untangle the complex web of relationships inherent in our data. This involved performing intricate regression analyses, correlation tests, and other statistical acrobatics to discern the hidden patterns lurking beneath the surface, not unlike a magician revealing the secrets of a seemingly impossible trick.

With our statistical arsenal at the ready, we meticulously examined the data spanning from 2009 to 2021, meticulously sifting through the numbers like archeologists delicately brushing off ancient artifacts in search of revelations from the past. Our aim was to tease out the nuances of the connection between paper goods machine setters in Kentucky and professor salaries across the United States, much like untangling a particularly stubborn knot in a ball of yarn.

But, of course, no research endeavor would be complete without a touch of whimsy. In keeping with our commitment to uncovering unexpected connections, we injected our methodology with a dash of lightheartedness and a penchant for puns, much like sprinkling confetti at a solemn affair. After all, what's a research project without the occasional dad joke or a playful nod to the whimsical nature of inquiry?

In essence, our methodology combined the rigor of statistical analysis with a touch of levity, all in the service of peeling back the layers of mystery shrouding the tenuous link between paper goods machine setters in Kentucky and the salaries of professors nationwide. Much like skilled artisans weaving together disparate threads to create a cohesive tapestry, we painstakingly threaded our way through the data, mindful of the delicate balance between earnest inquiry and occasional mirth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and Professor salaries in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and National Center for Education Statistics .

For the time period 2009 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9476108, r-squared of 0.8979662, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Wall Street Wages and Paper Trades: Unraveling the Roll Between Paper Goods Machine Setters in Kentucky and Professor Salaries Across the US"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the improbable connection between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in the bluegrass state of Kentucky and the enigmatic yet glamorous world of professor salaries in the United States. Employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics, we tirelessly worked on unrolling the complexities of this relationship.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9476108 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning from 2009 to 2021, suggesting a surprisingly strong link between these seemingly unrelated occupations. It seems that behind the scenes, the paper goods industry and academia share a bond that's tearable to resist! For each significant interaction, one might say there's a "sheet" amount of evidence to support this intriguing association.

Furthermore, our study sheds light on the oft-overlooked impact of paper goods machine setters, who, much like the unnoticed glue that holds together reams of paper, play an integral role in shaping the labor landscape. As the old saying goes, "When it comes to labor trends, don't just brush it off—take note and 'reem' in the data!"

Ultimately, our research not only underscores the unexpected interconnectedness between these vocations but also invites further examination into the fabric of seemingly incongruous professional domains. After all, as researchers, it's our duty to unravel the paper trail, even if it leads to unexpected puns!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The correlation between different occupations and salaries has long been a topic of interest in labor economics. In this study, we explore the unexpected link between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and professor salaries across the United States. This connection, while seemingly unrelated on the surface, has proven to be more than just pulp fiction.
It appears that there is a certain "thickness" to the relationship between the number of paper goods machine setters in Kentucky and the salaries of professors nationwide. Our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.9476108 (p < 0.01) over the period from 2009 to 2021, indicating a strikingly strong connection between these seemingly disparate roles. It seems that when it comes to labor trends, the paper trail leads to unexpected places, much like when you accidentally unravel an entire roll of toilet paper in one go.
The paper goods industry often flies under the radar, much like a paper airplane in a room full of books. However, our research has uncovered the significant impact of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders, who act as the unsung heroes behind the scenes, much like the invisible force holding together a well-crafted origami masterpiece. One might even say that they "fold" into the fabric of the labor market.
Furthermore, the discernible link between these occupations invites further exploration and scrutiny. Just as an unfurled scroll reveals its intricate contents, we are called to unravel the intertwined nature of these seemingly unrelated professional realms. And who better to do this than a team of researchers willing to "roll" up their sleeves and face the challenge head-on?
In the world of labor economics, it's essential to uncover unexpected connections and consider the hidden influences shaping labor dynamics. As the saying goes, "A good researcher is like a skilled paper goods machine tender, carefully aligning each piece to create meaningful insights."
Stay tuned as we untangle the intertwined web of paper goods and professor salaries, and perhaps discover more unexpected puns along the way!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The correlation analysis conducted on the data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics revealed a remarkably strong relationship between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and the salaries of professors in the United States. The correlation coefficient of 0.9476108 (p < 0.01) over the period from 2009 to 2021 suggests a compelling association, akin to the bond between a sharp pencil and a well-crafted paper airplane – unexpected, yet undeniably present.

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the robust correlation between these seemingly disparate occupations. It is clear from the figure that the relationship between the number of paper goods machine setters in Kentucky and professor salaries across the U.S. is as visually striking as discovering a perfectly folded origami masterpiece amidst a sea of crumpled sheets of paper – a surprising and delightful sight.

Our findings not only highlight the statistical significance of this connection but also bring attention to the often overlooked role of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in shaping labor dynamics. Much like the hidden adhesive that keeps a stack of sticky notes together, these workers play a crucial but unassuming part in the economic fabric, holding the paper industry together with quiet fortitude.

It is evident that behind the seemingly mundane task of setting, operating, and tending to paper goods machinery lies a profound influence on the broader labor market. One might say that just as a well-crafted paper airplane can soar to unexpected heights, the impact of these unsung professionals transcends the surface and influences the broader economic landscape.

In the world of economics and labor dynamics, it is imperative to uncover and acknowledge the unexpected links that shape our professional realms. As researchers, we are duty-bound to untangle the web of seemingly disparate occupations and unfold the unexpected connections, even if it results in an excess of paper-related puns.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and Professor salaries in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Wall Street Wages and Paper Trades: Unraveling the Roll Between Paper Goods Machine Setters in Kentucky and Professor Salaries Across the US"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the improbable connection between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in the bluegrass state of Kentucky and the enigmatic yet glamorous world of professor salaries in the United States. Employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics, we tirelessly worked on unrolling the complexities of this relationship.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9476108 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning from 2009 to 2021, suggesting a surprisingly strong link between these seemingly unrelated occupations. It seems that behind the scenes, the paper goods industry and academia share a bond that's tearable to resist! For each significant interaction, one might say there's a "sheet" amount of evidence to support this intriguing association.

Furthermore, our study sheds light on the oft-overlooked impact of paper goods machine setters, who, much like the unnoticed glue that holds together reams of paper, play an integral role in shaping the labor landscape. As the old saying goes, "When it comes to labor trends, don't just brush it off—take note and 'reem' in the data!"

Ultimately, our research not only underscores the unexpected interconnectedness between these vocations but also invites further examination into the fabric of seemingly incongruous professional domains. After all, as researchers, it's our duty to unravel the paper trail, even if it leads to unexpected puns!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between seemingly unrelated occupations and their influence on each other has long captivated the minds of labor economists and scholars alike. As expected, a slew of academic studies such as Smith and Doe's "Economic Forces at Play" and Jones' "Labor Interdependencies" have shed light on these connections. However, the unexpected association between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and professor salaries across the United States is truly a revelation that has the potential to "unroll" more than just paper goods.
In "Economic Forces at Play," Smith and Doe delve into the interconnectedness of various industries, highlighting how factors in one sector can have ripple effects in others. This is quite fitting, as our study unravels the interconnected relationship between the paper goods industry and academia, demonstrating how one occupation can crease its influence on another.
Furthermore, Jones' "Labor Interdependencies" offers valuable insights into the intricate web of occupations and their impact on the labor landscape. Our study adds a quirky twist to this concept by unraveling the unexpected bond between paper goods machine setters in the Bluegrass State and professor salaries nationwide. It seems that the labor market is a lot like a folded piece of origami paper - you never know what surprising shape it might take!
As we move beyond the world of traditional labor economics literature, it is essential to consider the influence of non-fiction reads on our understanding of labor dynamics. Works such as "Nickel and Dimed" by Barbara Ehrenreich and "The Working Poor" by David K. Shipler provide a poignant look at the struggles of low-wage workers, highlighting the importance of understanding the underappreciated roles in various industries. Speaking of underappreciated roles, have you heard the one about the paper goods machine setter who always got overlooked? He was a real un-cutter-stood worker!
In exploring the intersection between seemingly unrelated occupations, one cannot overlook the impact of fiction literature on shaping our understanding of professional domains. The classic novel "The Paper Magician" by Charlie N. Holmberg may not directly address the nexus between paper goods machine setters and professor salaries, but it certainly adds a whimsical touch to our exploration. After all, who wouldn't want to dive into a world where paper has magical properties, much like the surprising influence of paper goods machine setters on professor salaries?
Moving away from traditional literature, it is vital to acknowledge the unexpected sources of insight that have shaped our understanding of labor dynamics. While conducting this research, we couldn't help but draw inspiration from popular cartoons and children's shows. Take, for example, "SpongeBob SquarePants," which showcases the diverse range of occupations in Bikini Bottom. It's as if the creators of the show were trying to tell us that even the most unassuming professions, such as "manually inflating a balloon at a sporting event," can have an impact, much like the role of paper goods machine setters in the labor market. And speaking of SpongeBob, did you hear about the Sponge who got a job at the paper goods factory? His boss told him he had to shape up or ship out, but all he wanted to do was absorb all the knowledge!
In unpacking the interplay between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and professor salaries across the United States, it's essential to embrace unexpected sources of insight. As we roll out the findings of our study, it becomes clear that even the quirkiest connections can yield valuable insights, and perhaps a few unexpected puns along the way.

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis conducted on the data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics revealed a remarkably strong relationship between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and the salaries of professors in the United States. The correlation coefficient of 0.9476108 (p < 0.01) over the period from 2009 to 2021 suggests a compelling association, akin to the bond between a sharp pencil and a well-crafted paper airplane – unexpected, yet undeniably present.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the robust correlation between these seemingly disparate occupations. It is clear from the figure that the relationship between the number of paper goods machine setters in Kentucky and professor salaries across the U.S. is as visually striking as discovering a perfectly folded origami masterpiece amidst a sea of crumpled sheets of paper – a surprising and delightful sight.
Our findings not only highlight the statistical significance of this connection but also bring attention to the often overlooked role of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in shaping labor dynamics. Much like the hidden adhesive that keeps a stack of sticky notes together, these workers play a crucial but unassuming part in the economic fabric, holding the paper industry together with quiet fortitude.
It is evident that behind the seemingly mundane task of setting, operating, and tending to paper goods machinery lies a profound influence on the broader labor market. One might say that just as a well-crafted paper airplane can soar to unexpected heights, the impact of these unsung professionals transcends the surface and influences the broader economic landscape.
In the world of economics and labor dynamics, it is imperative to uncover and acknowledge the unexpected links that shape our professional realms. As researchers, we are duty-bound to untangle the web of seemingly disparate occupations and unfold the unexpected connections, even if it results in an excess of paper-related puns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study support and expand upon the existing literature that has long explored the interconnected nature of different occupations in shaping the labor landscape. The strong correlation coefficient of 0.9476108 (p < 0.01) between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and professor salaries across the United States echoes the revelations brought forth by Smith and Doe's "Economic Forces at Play" and Jones' "Labor Interdependencies." Much like a well-folded paper airplane, our study has taken flight to demonstrate the unexpectedly profound association between these seemingly unrelated vocations.

Our results provide empirical evidence to underscore the significant influence of the paper goods industry on the realm of academia. This unexpected link, much like a well-crafted origami creation, has unfolded a new dimension in our understanding of labor dynamics. It seems that the unassuming paper goods machine setters in Kentucky serve as the underappreciated adhesive that holds together the fabric of not just the paper industry, but also the broader labor market. It's as if they've been metaphorically creasing and folding the labor landscape all along!

The robust correlation highlighted in our study reinforces the idea that seemingly incongruous occupations can have a substantial impact on each other. This revelation echoes the insights of Barbara Ehrenreich's "Nickel and Dimed" and David K. Shipler's "The Working Poor," which provide a poignant look at the underappreciated roles in various industries. Speaking of underappreciated, did you hear about the professor who finally agreed to a pay raise? He decided not to "paper" over the offer and "unrolled" his acceptance!

Furthermore, our study joins the ranks of unexpected sources of insight that have shaped our understanding of labor dynamics such as popular cartoons and children's shows. Just as "SpongeBob SquarePants" showcases the diverse range of occupations in Bikini Bottom, our research sheds light on the diverse influences at play in the labor market, even if it leads to an "absorb-ing" amount of paper-related puns!

The visual representation of our results in the scatterplot highlights the striking correlation between these unlikely bedfellows, much like discovering a well-folded origami masterpiece amidst a sea of crumpled sheets of paper. Indeed, the seemingly mundane task of setting, operating, and tending to paper goods machinery has proven to have a profound influence on the broader economic landscape, much like finding a hidden message in a crumpled piece of paper.

In essence, our study underscores the imperative to recognize and comprehend the unexpected links that shape our professional realms. As researchers, it's our duty to untangle the web of seemingly disparate occupations and unfold the unexpected connections, even if it results in an excess of paper-related puns. After all, can you really have too many puns when it comes to unraveling the ties that bind our labor market?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and Professor salaries in the US. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Wall Street Wages and Paper Trades: Unraveling the Roll Between Paper Goods Machine Setters in Kentucky and Professor Salaries Across the US"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the improbable connection between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in the bluegrass state of Kentucky and the enigmatic yet glamorous world of professor salaries in the United States. Employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics, we tirelessly worked on unrolling the complexities of this relationship.

Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9476108 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning from 2009 to 2021, suggesting a surprisingly strong link between these seemingly unrelated occupations. It seems that behind the scenes, the paper goods industry and academia share a bond that's tearable to resist! For each significant interaction, one might say there's a "sheet" amount of evidence to support this intriguing association.

Furthermore, our study sheds light on the oft-overlooked impact of paper goods machine setters, who, much like the unnoticed glue that holds together reams of paper, play an integral role in shaping the labor landscape. As the old saying goes, "When it comes to labor trends, don't just brush it off—take note and 'reem' in the data!"

Ultimately, our research not only underscores the unexpected interconnectedness between these vocations but also invites further examination into the fabric of seemingly incongruous professional domains. After all, as researchers, it's our duty to unravel the paper trail, even if it leads to unexpected puns!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The correlation between different occupations and salaries has long been a topic of interest in labor economics. In this study, we explore the unexpected link between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and professor salaries across the United States. This connection, while seemingly unrelated on the surface, has proven to be more than just pulp fiction.
It appears that there is a certain "thickness" to the relationship between the number of paper goods machine setters in Kentucky and the salaries of professors nationwide. Our analysis reveals a correlation coefficient of 0.9476108 (p < 0.01) over the period from 2009 to 2021, indicating a strikingly strong connection between these seemingly disparate roles. It seems that when it comes to labor trends, the paper trail leads to unexpected places, much like when you accidentally unravel an entire roll of toilet paper in one go.
The paper goods industry often flies under the radar, much like a paper airplane in a room full of books. However, our research has uncovered the significant impact of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders, who act as the unsung heroes behind the scenes, much like the invisible force holding together a well-crafted origami masterpiece. One might even say that they "fold" into the fabric of the labor market.
Furthermore, the discernible link between these occupations invites further exploration and scrutiny. Just as an unfurled scroll reveals its intricate contents, we are called to unravel the intertwined nature of these seemingly unrelated professional realms. And who better to do this than a team of researchers willing to "roll" up their sleeves and face the challenge head-on?
In the world of labor economics, it's essential to uncover unexpected connections and consider the hidden influences shaping labor dynamics. As the saying goes, "A good researcher is like a skilled paper goods machine tender, carefully aligning each piece to create meaningful insights."
Stay tuned as we untangle the intertwined web of paper goods and professor salaries, and perhaps discover more unexpected puns along the way!

[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis conducted on the data collected from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics revealed a remarkably strong relationship between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and the salaries of professors in the United States. The correlation coefficient of 0.9476108 (p < 0.01) over the period from 2009 to 2021 suggests a compelling association, akin to the bond between a sharp pencil and a well-crafted paper airplane – unexpected, yet undeniably present.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually illustrates the robust correlation between these seemingly disparate occupations. It is clear from the figure that the relationship between the number of paper goods machine setters in Kentucky and professor salaries across the U.S. is as visually striking as discovering a perfectly folded origami masterpiece amidst a sea of crumpled sheets of paper – a surprising and delightful sight.
Our findings not only highlight the statistical significance of this connection but also bring attention to the often overlooked role of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in shaping labor dynamics. Much like the hidden adhesive that keeps a stack of sticky notes together, these workers play a crucial but unassuming part in the economic fabric, holding the paper industry together with quiet fortitude.
It is evident that behind the seemingly mundane task of setting, operating, and tending to paper goods machinery lies a profound influence on the broader labor market. One might say that just as a well-crafted paper airplane can soar to unexpected heights, the impact of these unsung professionals transcends the surface and influences the broader economic landscape.
In the world of economics and labor dynamics, it is imperative to uncover and acknowledge the unexpected links that shape our professional realms. As researchers, we are duty-bound to untangle the web of seemingly disparate occupations and unfold the unexpected connections, even if it results in an excess of paper-related puns.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unraveled a surprisingly strong correlation between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky and professor salaries across the United States. This unexpected bond between these seemingly unrelated occupations is as undeniable as the adhesive strength of a well-placed sticky note – it simply sticks. One might even say that the connection between the paper goods industry and academia is not just a "tissue" of lies, but a substantial finding in the labor landscape.

Our study underscores the significant impact of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders, who, much like the quiet heroes of a library, hold the labor market together with their understated influence. It is clear that these professionals 'cut' through the economic landscape much like a well-sharpened pencil 'cuts' through a blank sheet of paper – with precision and impact.

Importantly, our findings highlight the need to consider the role of seemingly overlooked occupations in shaping broader labor dynamics. As researchers, we are 'bound' to uncover these unexpected connections, even if it means 'papering' over the usual scholarly seriousness with some light-hearted puns.

In closing, our research urges further exploration into the intricate web of interconnections between various vocations. However, it also signals that in the case of paper goods machine setters and professor salaries, we might have 'rolled' up all the evidence needed. It seems that the paper trail has led us to a conclusion as clear as a freshly printed page – no more research is needed in this area.

And that, my dear colleagues, is a wrap!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Wall Street Wages and Paper Trades: Unraveling the Roll Between Paper Goods Machine Setters in Kentucky and Professor Salaries Across the US. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Economic Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Wall Street Wages and Paper Trades: Unraveling the Roll Between Paper Goods Machine Setters in Kentucky and Professor Salaries Across the US. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Interdisciplinary Labor Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Wall Street Wages and Paper Trades: Unraveling the Roll Between Paper Goods Machine Setters in Kentucky and Professor Salaries Across the US with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the improbable connection between the number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in the bluegrass state of Kentucky and the enigmatic yet glamorous world of professor salaries in the United States. Employing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the National Center for Education Statistics, we tirelessly worked on unrolling the complexities of this relationship.
Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9476108 (p < 0.01) for the period spanning from 2009 to 2021, suggesting a surprisingly strong link between these seemingly unrelated occupations. It seems that behind the scenes, the paper goods industry and academia share a bond that's tearable to resist! For each significant interaction, one might say there's a "sheet" amount of evidence to support this intriguing association.
Furthermore, our study sheds light on the oft-overlooked impact of paper goods machine setters, who, much like the unnoticed glue that holds together reams of paper, play an integral role in shaping the labor landscape. As the old saying goes, "When it comes to labor trends, don't just brush it off—take note and 'reem' in the data!"
Ultimately, our research not only underscores the unexpected interconnectedness between these vocations but also invites further examination into the fabric of seemingly incongruous professional domains. After all, as researchers, it's our duty to unravel the paper trail, even if it leads to unexpected puns!

ChatGPT:

Wall Street, wages, paper trades, paper goods machine setters, Kentucky, professor salaries, United States, Bureau of Labor Statistics, National Center for Education Statistics, correlation coefficient, labor trends, academia, paper goods industry, labor landscape, vocational interconnectedness, professional domains, research, puns

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky

Professor salaries in the US
Detailed data title: Average salary of full-time instructional faculty on 9-month contracts in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by academic rank of Professor
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Professor salaries in the US

Correlation r = 0.9476108 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8979662 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 89.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Professor salaries in the US) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky) over the 13 years from 2009 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.7E-7. 0.0000008692007537366746000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 8.7E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,150,482 random variables You don't actually need 1 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.83, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
The number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky (Laborers)1680128012901320139018802140235026402560229019501070
Professor salaries in the US (Salary)134915133892132719131745132028134443136755138492138746138826139640136906130262




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1680,1280,1290,1320,1390,1880,2140,2350,2640,2560,2290,1950,1070,])
array_2 = np.array([134915,133892,132719,131745,132028,134443,136755,138492,138746,138826,139640,136906,130262,])
array_1_name = "The number of paper goods machine setters, operators, and tenders in Kentucky"
array_2_name = "Professor salaries in the US"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 2904 · Black Variable ID: 8582 · Red Variable ID: 1201
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0