about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,890 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Orlando and the second variable is The number of maintenance workers, machinery in Florida.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As air pollution in Orlando decreased, it led to a decline in the population of rust particles in the air. With fewer rust particles in the air, the machinery in Florida experienced reduced wear and tear, leading to decreased maintenance requirements. This unexpected connection between Orlando's air quality and Florida's machinery population has certainly rustled up some interest in the world of industrial maintenance.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a serene park in Orlando, where a group of maintenance workers is leisurely lounging under a lush, shady tree. The scene should showcase the clear, fresh air, and in the background, subtly illustrate the well-maintained machinery humming smoothly, indicating the minimal need for maintenance. The focus should be on the workers enjoying the peaceful setting and the unobtrusive presence of the well-functioning machinery, all rendered in photo-realistic detail. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Orlando and The number of maintenance workers, machinery in Florida. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Cutsy graphics A photo-realistic image Macabre A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Art nouveau
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Orlando and The number of maintenance workers, machinery in Florida, in the following situation: Because with cleaner air, there are fewer rust-causing pollutants. With less rust, machinery in Florida doesn't need as much maintenance, so there are fewer maintenance workers needed.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Orlando, the air is clear and fresh with fewer rust-causing pollutants. As a result, the machinery in Florida is well-maintained and needs fewer maintenance workers. The maintenance workers are seen relaxing under a shady tree, enjoying the clean air, while the machinery hums smoothly in the background.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In Orlando, the air is clear and fresh with fewer rust-causing pollutants. As a result, the machinery in Florida is well-maintained and needs fewer maintenance workers. The maintenance workers are seen relaxing under a shady tree, enjoying the clean air, while the machinery hums smoothly in the background. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a serene park in Orlando, where a group of maintenance workers is leisurely lounging under a lush, shady tree. The scene should showcase the clear, fresh air, and in the background, subtly illustrate the well-maintained machinery humming smoothly, indicating the minimal need for maintenance. The focus should be on the workers enjoying the peaceful setting and the unobtrusive presence of the well-functioning machinery, all rendered in photo-realistic detail.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Orlando caused The number of maintenance workers, machinery in Florida to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Air We Breathe: A Maintenance Matter

The Journal of Atmospheric Comedic Research

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and The number of maintenance workers, machinery in Florida. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9171737 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"The Air We Breathe: A Maintenance Matter"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between air pollution and the number of maintenance workers and machinery in the state of Florida has long been a topic of discovery. In this research, data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics was utilized to delve into this complex association. The findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9171737 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a strong statistical relationship. The implications of these results for the maintenance sector as well as air quality management are discussed, shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated factors. This study provides insight into the importance of maintenance and the breath of fresh air it can provide for environmental sustainability.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and The number of maintenance workers, machinery in Florida. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Air We Breathe: A Maintenance Matter"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between air pollution and the number of maintenance workers and machinery in the state of Florida has long been a topic of discovery. In this research, data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics was utilized to delve into this complex association. The findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9171737 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a strong statistical relationship. The implications of these results for the maintenance sector as well as air quality management are discussed, shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated factors. This study provides insight into the importance of maintenance and the breath of fresh air it can provide for environmental sustainability.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The relationship between environmental pollution and the labor force dedicated to its maintenance is a subject of increasing interest and scrutiny. The impact of air pollution on public health and the environment has been well-documented, but the specific link to the number of maintenance workers and machinery is an area that warrants further exploration. The city of Orlando, Florida, known for its enchanting attractions and picturesque landscapes, has been grappling with air pollution concerns in recent years. Concurrently, the state of Florida has seen a gradual increase in the number of maintenance workers and machinery. These seemingly disparate trends have fueled curiosity regarding the potential interplay between air pollution levels and the maintenance sector in the state.

The aim of this study is to systematically investigate the relationship between air pollution in Orlando and the number of maintenance workers and machinery in Florida. Utilizing data from reputable sources such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we seek to uncover any discernible patterns and correlations. The analytical framework adopted in this research reflects a comprehensive approach, incorporating statistical methods and econometric models to rigorously examine the association between the variables of interest.

Throughout this inquiry, we remain cognizant of the multifaceted nature of this relationship, recognizing that various external factors may influence the observed dynamics. Additionally, the implications of these findings hold potential significance for both the maintenance sector and environmental policymakers. By shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly incongruent elements, this study endeavors to contribute to the broader discourse on environmental sustainability and labor dynamics.

Undoubtedly, the scope of this investigation is not without its complexities, and the findings are poised to unravel intricate connections that lie beneath the surface. As we embark on this intriguing journey, we invite the reader to join us in navigating through the labyrinth of statistical analyses and empirical observations, with the promise of uncovering insightful revelations and perhaps even a breath of fresh air amidst the academic rigor.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and The number of maintenance workers, machinery in Florida. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Air We Breathe: A Maintenance Matter"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between air pollution and the number of maintenance workers and machinery in the state of Florida has long been a topic of discovery. In this research, data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics was utilized to delve into this complex association. The findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9171737 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a strong statistical relationship. The implications of these results for the maintenance sector as well as air quality management are discussed, shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated factors. This study provides insight into the importance of maintenance and the breath of fresh air it can provide for environmental sustainability.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between environmental pollution and the labor force dedicated to its maintenance is a subject of increasing interest and scrutiny. The impact of air pollution on public health and the environment has been well-documented, but the specific link to the number of maintenance workers and machinery is an area that warrants further exploration. The city of Orlando, Florida, known for its enchanting attractions and picturesque landscapes, has been grappling with air pollution concerns in recent years. Concurrently, the state of Florida has seen a gradual increase in the number of maintenance workers and machinery. These seemingly disparate trends have fueled curiosity regarding the potential interplay between air pollution levels and the maintenance sector in the state.
The aim of this study is to systematically investigate the relationship between air pollution in Orlando and the number of maintenance workers and machinery in Florida. Utilizing data from reputable sources such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we seek to uncover any discernible patterns and correlations. The analytical framework adopted in this research reflects a comprehensive approach, incorporating statistical methods and econometric models to rigorously examine the association between the variables of interest.
Throughout this inquiry, we remain cognizant of the multifaceted nature of this relationship, recognizing that various external factors may influence the observed dynamics. Additionally, the implications of these findings hold potential significance for both the maintenance sector and environmental policymakers. By shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly incongruent elements, this study endeavors to contribute to the broader discourse on environmental sustainability and labor dynamics.
Undoubtedly, the scope of this investigation is not without its complexities, and the findings are poised to unravel intricate connections that lie beneath the surface. As we embark on this intriguing journey, we invite the reader to join us in navigating through the labyrinth of statistical analyses and empirical observations, with the promise of uncovering insightful revelations and perhaps even a breath of fresh air amidst the academic rigor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Previous studies have explored the relationship between air pollution and various environmental and public health outcomes. Smith et al. (2015) found a positive correlation between air pollution and respiratory diseases in urban populations, highlighting the detrimental effects of poor air quality. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) investigated the impact of air pollution on plant and animal ecosystems, demonstrating the far-reaching consequences of environmental degradation. While these studies offer valuable insights into the effects of air pollution, they do not specifically address the potential connection with the number of maintenance workers and machinery in Florida.

Despite the lack of direct research on the specific relationship under investigation, the literature on environmental management and labor force dynamics provides a foundation for this study. The book "Environmental Policy and Industrial Innovation: Strategies in Europe, the USA, and Japan" by Smith and Brown (2008) delves into the intricate nexus between environmental policies and industrial practices, shedding light on the need for a skilled labor force to address environmental challenges.

In a similar vein, "The Economics of Work and Energy" by Johnson (2012) delves into the economic principles underlying labor allocation in energy-intensive industries, albeit not specifically focusing on maintenance workers in the context of air pollution. Conversely, the fiction novel "Maintenance Mania: A Tale of Troubles and Tools" by Green (2017) offers a fictionalized account of a maintenance worker embroiled in unexpected adventures, providing a lighthearted perspective on the world of maintenance.

In addition to formal literature, informal sources such as social media posts have also drawn attention to the relevance of maintenance workers and air quality. One Twitter post by @CleanAirEnthusiast remarked, "The unsung heroes of air quality - maintenance workers keeping the machinery humming and the air a bit less grungy! #MaintenanceMatters." While anecdotal in nature, such posts reflect a growing recognition of the role of maintenance workers in environmental sustainability efforts.

As we delve deeper into the exploration of the relationship between air pollution in Orlando and the number of maintenance workers and machinery in Florida, these tangential references serve as reminders of the multifaceted nature of this inquiry and the potential for unexpected discoveries in seemingly unlikely places.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and The number of maintenance workers, machinery in Florida. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Air We Breathe: A Maintenance Matter"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between air pollution and the number of maintenance workers and machinery in the state of Florida has long been a topic of discovery. In this research, data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics was utilized to delve into this complex association. The findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9171737 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a strong statistical relationship. The implications of these results for the maintenance sector as well as air quality management are discussed, shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated factors. This study provides insight into the importance of maintenance and the breath of fresh air it can provide for environmental sustainability.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The relationship between environmental pollution and the labor force dedicated to its maintenance is a subject of increasing interest and scrutiny. The impact of air pollution on public health and the environment has been well-documented, but the specific link to the number of maintenance workers and machinery is an area that warrants further exploration. The city of Orlando, Florida, known for its enchanting attractions and picturesque landscapes, has been grappling with air pollution concerns in recent years. Concurrently, the state of Florida has seen a gradual increase in the number of maintenance workers and machinery. These seemingly disparate trends have fueled curiosity regarding the potential interplay between air pollution levels and the maintenance sector in the state.
The aim of this study is to systematically investigate the relationship between air pollution in Orlando and the number of maintenance workers and machinery in Florida. Utilizing data from reputable sources such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we seek to uncover any discernible patterns and correlations. The analytical framework adopted in this research reflects a comprehensive approach, incorporating statistical methods and econometric models to rigorously examine the association between the variables of interest.
Throughout this inquiry, we remain cognizant of the multifaceted nature of this relationship, recognizing that various external factors may influence the observed dynamics. Additionally, the implications of these findings hold potential significance for both the maintenance sector and environmental policymakers. By shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly incongruent elements, this study endeavors to contribute to the broader discourse on environmental sustainability and labor dynamics.
Undoubtedly, the scope of this investigation is not without its complexities, and the findings are poised to unravel intricate connections that lie beneath the surface. As we embark on this intriguing journey, we invite the reader to join us in navigating through the labyrinth of statistical analyses and empirical observations, with the promise of uncovering insightful revelations and perhaps even a breath of fresh air amidst the academic rigor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

The research methodology employed in this study follows a multifaceted approach to investigate the relationship between air pollution in Orlando and the number of maintenance workers and machinery in Florida. Data collected from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) provided the foundation for the comprehensive analysis, spanning the period from 2003 to 2022.

To quantify air pollution levels in Orlando, extensive utilization of air quality monitoring data derived from the EPA's Air Quality System (AQS) was undertaken. This encompassed a spectrum of pollutants, including particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and carbon monoxide. A corollary consideration of meteorological variables, such as temperature, wind speed, and humidity, was integrated to capture the nuanced dynamics of atmospheric conditions. The examination of maintenance workforce and machinery in Florida relied on detailed occupational and employment statistics from the BLS, incorporating diverse industries associated with maintenance activities.

Incorporating a combination of quantitative and qualitative methodologies, the initial phase involved a descriptive analysis to delineate temporal trends and spatial patterns of air pollution in Orlando. Subsequently, econometric modeling techniques, including time-series analysis and regression analysis, were employed to ascertain the statistical association between air pollution and the number of maintenance workers and machinery in Florida. The use of autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models and panel data regressions enabled the identification of potential causal relationships and predictive patterns.

Closer inspection of the data unearthed peculiar fluctuations and anomalies, prompting a deeper dive into the intricacies of the maintenance sector and its nexus with environmental dynamics. This led to the development of a novel "Maintenance-Atmosphere Interaction Framework" (MAIF), which sought to encapsulate the interplay between aerosol deposition on surfaces and the ensuing maintenance activities. The integration of this conceptual framework enriched the analysis, offering a holistic perspective on the reciprocal influence of maintenance efforts and air quality management.

Given the idiosyncratic nature of the data, encountering a few outliers was inevitable. However, rather than casting them aside as statistical nuisances, these outliers were scrutinized as potential sources of unanticipated revelation, akin to stumbling upon a hidden treasure amidst the troves of numerical data. Robustness tests and sensitivity analyses were carried out to corroborate the robustness of the findings and validate the sincerity of the relationships delineated.

The confluence of these methodological endeavors culminated in the comprehensive elucidation of the intricate interdependence between air pollution in Orlando and the maintenance workforce and machinery in Florida. By weaving together the tapestry of statistical inferences and conceptual elucidations, the study offers an empirically grounded narrative of the symbiotic relationship between maintenance labor and environmental quality.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and The number of maintenance workers, machinery in Florida. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9171737, r-squared of 0.8412076, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"The Air We Breathe: A Maintenance Matter"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between air pollution and the number of maintenance workers and machinery in the state of Florida has long been a topic of discovery. In this research, data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics was utilized to delve into this complex association. The findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9171737 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a strong statistical relationship. The implications of these results for the maintenance sector as well as air quality management are discussed, shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated factors. This study provides insight into the importance of maintenance and the breath of fresh air it can provide for environmental sustainability.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The relationship between environmental pollution and the labor force dedicated to its maintenance is a subject of increasing interest and scrutiny. The impact of air pollution on public health and the environment has been well-documented, but the specific link to the number of maintenance workers and machinery is an area that warrants further exploration. The city of Orlando, Florida, known for its enchanting attractions and picturesque landscapes, has been grappling with air pollution concerns in recent years. Concurrently, the state of Florida has seen a gradual increase in the number of maintenance workers and machinery. These seemingly disparate trends have fueled curiosity regarding the potential interplay between air pollution levels and the maintenance sector in the state.
The aim of this study is to systematically investigate the relationship between air pollution in Orlando and the number of maintenance workers and machinery in Florida. Utilizing data from reputable sources such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we seek to uncover any discernible patterns and correlations. The analytical framework adopted in this research reflects a comprehensive approach, incorporating statistical methods and econometric models to rigorously examine the association between the variables of interest.
Throughout this inquiry, we remain cognizant of the multifaceted nature of this relationship, recognizing that various external factors may influence the observed dynamics. Additionally, the implications of these findings hold potential significance for both the maintenance sector and environmental policymakers. By shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly incongruent elements, this study endeavors to contribute to the broader discourse on environmental sustainability and labor dynamics.
Undoubtedly, the scope of this investigation is not without its complexities, and the findings are poised to unravel intricate connections that lie beneath the surface. As we embark on this intriguing journey, we invite the reader to join us in navigating through the labyrinth of statistical analyses and empirical observations, with the promise of uncovering insightful revelations and perhaps even a breath of fresh air amidst the academic rigor.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The data analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9171737 between air pollution in Orlando and the number of maintenance workers and machinery in Florida from 2003 to 2022. This indicates a strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8412076 suggests that approximately 84.12% of the variability in the number of maintenance workers and machinery can be explained by the variations in air pollution levels. The significance level of p < 0.01 further corroborates the robustness of this relationship, providing compelling evidence of its statistical relevance.

Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the pronounced correlation between air pollution and the maintenance workforce and machinery. The data points form a clear upward trend, mirroring the upward trajectory of maintenance resources alongside increasing air pollution levels. The strong coherence depicted in the scatterplot supports the quantitative findings, offering a visual representation of the interconnectedness between these seemingly unrelated factors.

The robustness of the statistical relationship unveiled in this analysis highlights the inherent dynamism between environmental conditions and the labor force dedicated to maintenance activities. The implications of these findings extend beyond their statistical significance, encompassing potential practical and policy considerations. The intricate dance between air quality and the workforce responsible for its upkeep yields an intriguing narrative that reverberates through the realms of both environmental management and labor dynamics.

These results underscore the significance of considering maintenance as a pivotal factor in environmental sustainability. As the proverbial saying goes, "clean air starts with clean maintenance." The symbiotic relationship between these variables invites further exploration and contemplation, carrying implications for a breath of fresh air in the discourse surrounding environmental quality and labor allocation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and The number of maintenance workers, machinery in Florida. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"The Air We Breathe: A Maintenance Matter"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between air pollution and the number of maintenance workers and machinery in the state of Florida has long been a topic of discovery. In this research, data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics was utilized to delve into this complex association. The findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9171737 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a strong statistical relationship. The implications of these results for the maintenance sector as well as air quality management are discussed, shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated factors. This study provides insight into the importance of maintenance and the breath of fresh air it can provide for environmental sustainability.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Previous studies have explored the relationship between air pollution and various environmental and public health outcomes. Smith et al. (2015) found a positive correlation between air pollution and respiratory diseases in urban populations, highlighting the detrimental effects of poor air quality. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) investigated the impact of air pollution on plant and animal ecosystems, demonstrating the far-reaching consequences of environmental degradation. While these studies offer valuable insights into the effects of air pollution, they do not specifically address the potential connection with the number of maintenance workers and machinery in Florida.
Despite the lack of direct research on the specific relationship under investigation, the literature on environmental management and labor force dynamics provides a foundation for this study. The book "Environmental Policy and Industrial Innovation: Strategies in Europe, the USA, and Japan" by Smith and Brown (2008) delves into the intricate nexus between environmental policies and industrial practices, shedding light on the need for a skilled labor force to address environmental challenges.
In a similar vein, "The Economics of Work and Energy" by Johnson (2012) delves into the economic principles underlying labor allocation in energy-intensive industries, albeit not specifically focusing on maintenance workers in the context of air pollution. Conversely, the fiction novel "Maintenance Mania: A Tale of Troubles and Tools" by Green (2017) offers a fictionalized account of a maintenance worker embroiled in unexpected adventures, providing a lighthearted perspective on the world of maintenance.
In addition to formal literature, informal sources such as social media posts have also drawn attention to the relevance of maintenance workers and air quality. One Twitter post by @CleanAirEnthusiast remarked, "The unsung heroes of air quality - maintenance workers keeping the machinery humming and the air a bit less grungy! #MaintenanceMatters." While anecdotal in nature, such posts reflect a growing recognition of the role of maintenance workers in environmental sustainability efforts.
As we delve deeper into the exploration of the relationship between air pollution in Orlando and the number of maintenance workers and machinery in Florida, these tangential references serve as reminders of the multifaceted nature of this inquiry and the potential for unexpected discoveries in seemingly unlikely places.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9171737 between air pollution in Orlando and the number of maintenance workers and machinery in Florida from 2003 to 2022. This indicates a strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8412076 suggests that approximately 84.12% of the variability in the number of maintenance workers and machinery can be explained by the variations in air pollution levels. The significance level of p < 0.01 further corroborates the robustness of this relationship, providing compelling evidence of its statistical relevance.
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the pronounced correlation between air pollution and the maintenance workforce and machinery. The data points form a clear upward trend, mirroring the upward trajectory of maintenance resources alongside increasing air pollution levels. The strong coherence depicted in the scatterplot supports the quantitative findings, offering a visual representation of the interconnectedness between these seemingly unrelated factors.
The robustness of the statistical relationship unveiled in this analysis highlights the inherent dynamism between environmental conditions and the labor force dedicated to maintenance activities. The implications of these findings extend beyond their statistical significance, encompassing potential practical and policy considerations. The intricate dance between air quality and the workforce responsible for its upkeep yields an intriguing narrative that reverberates through the realms of both environmental management and labor dynamics.
These results underscore the significance of considering maintenance as a pivotal factor in environmental sustainability. As the proverbial saying goes, "clean air starts with clean maintenance." The symbiotic relationship between these variables invites further exploration and contemplation, carrying implications for a breath of fresh air in the discourse surrounding environmental quality and labor allocation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study provide compelling evidence of a strong positive correlation between the levels of air pollution in Orlando and the number of maintenance workers and machinery in Florida. The statistical relationship, supported by a high correlation coefficient and a significance level of p < 0.01, reinforces the interconnectedness of environmental conditions and the labor force dedicated to maintenance activities.

The observed correlation aligns with prior research that has emphasized the multifaceted impacts of air pollution on various aspects of the environment and public health. While this investigation did not focus on the respiratory or ecological consequences of poor air quality, it indirectly reinforces the importance of addressing air pollution through the readiness and capacity of the maintenance workforce and machinery.

Drawing upon the tangential references in the literature review, the fictionalized account of a maintenance worker navigating unexpected adventures in "Maintenance Mania: A Tale of Troubles and Tools" by Green (2017) takes on a newfound relevance in light of the study's findings. The challenges and triumphs of the protagonist in maintaining the machinery parallel the essential role of maintenance workers in upholding environmental quality. Indeed, as the plot of this fictional narrative unfolds, it provides subtle insights into the unyielding dedication and impact of maintenance efforts on the air we breathe.

Furthermore, the social media post highlighting the role of maintenance workers as "unsung heroes of air quality" offers a lighthearted yet pertinent perspective. While such anecdotes may initially appear whimsical, the statistical evidence presented in this study underscores the significance of the maintenance workforce in preserving environmental sustainability. Hence, these seemingly frivolous references from the literature review ultimately serve to underscore the relevance and depth of the research findings.

The scatterplot in Fig. 1 visually encapsulates the strong coherence between air pollution and the maintenance workforce and machinery, providing a tangible representation of the statistical relationship. The upward trajectory of maintenance resources alongside increasing air pollution levels mirrors the labor-intensive efforts required to address environmental challenges. The correlation depicted in this visual representation not only bolsters the quantitative results but also serves as a compelling testament to the intricate dance between environmental conditions and the labor force responsible for maintaining them.

In closing, the research findings shed light on the critical role of maintenance in environmental sustainability, accentuating the interconnectedness between seemingly disparate factors. The statistical evidence presented in this study reaffirms the adage that "clean air starts with clean maintenance." As the discourse surrounding environmental quality and labor allocation continues to evolve, the implications of this research call for a deeper appreciation of the symbiotic relationship between maintenance and air quality.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Orlando and The number of maintenance workers, machinery in Florida. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"The Air We Breathe: A Maintenance Matter"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The relationship between air pollution and the number of maintenance workers and machinery in the state of Florida has long been a topic of discovery. In this research, data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics was utilized to delve into this complex association. The findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9171737 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a strong statistical relationship. The implications of these results for the maintenance sector as well as air quality management are discussed, shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated factors. This study provides insight into the importance of maintenance and the breath of fresh air it can provide for environmental sustainability.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The relationship between environmental pollution and the labor force dedicated to its maintenance is a subject of increasing interest and scrutiny. The impact of air pollution on public health and the environment has been well-documented, but the specific link to the number of maintenance workers and machinery is an area that warrants further exploration. The city of Orlando, Florida, known for its enchanting attractions and picturesque landscapes, has been grappling with air pollution concerns in recent years. Concurrently, the state of Florida has seen a gradual increase in the number of maintenance workers and machinery. These seemingly disparate trends have fueled curiosity regarding the potential interplay between air pollution levels and the maintenance sector in the state.
The aim of this study is to systematically investigate the relationship between air pollution in Orlando and the number of maintenance workers and machinery in Florida. Utilizing data from reputable sources such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we seek to uncover any discernible patterns and correlations. The analytical framework adopted in this research reflects a comprehensive approach, incorporating statistical methods and econometric models to rigorously examine the association between the variables of interest.
Throughout this inquiry, we remain cognizant of the multifaceted nature of this relationship, recognizing that various external factors may influence the observed dynamics. Additionally, the implications of these findings hold potential significance for both the maintenance sector and environmental policymakers. By shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly incongruent elements, this study endeavors to contribute to the broader discourse on environmental sustainability and labor dynamics.
Undoubtedly, the scope of this investigation is not without its complexities, and the findings are poised to unravel intricate connections that lie beneath the surface. As we embark on this intriguing journey, we invite the reader to join us in navigating through the labyrinth of statistical analyses and empirical observations, with the promise of uncovering insightful revelations and perhaps even a breath of fresh air amidst the academic rigor.

[[RESULTS]]
The data analysis revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9171737 between air pollution in Orlando and the number of maintenance workers and machinery in Florida from 2003 to 2022. This indicates a strong positive linear relationship between the two variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.8412076 suggests that approximately 84.12% of the variability in the number of maintenance workers and machinery can be explained by the variations in air pollution levels. The significance level of p < 0.01 further corroborates the robustness of this relationship, providing compelling evidence of its statistical relevance.
Fig. 1 displays a scatterplot illustrating the pronounced correlation between air pollution and the maintenance workforce and machinery. The data points form a clear upward trend, mirroring the upward trajectory of maintenance resources alongside increasing air pollution levels. The strong coherence depicted in the scatterplot supports the quantitative findings, offering a visual representation of the interconnectedness between these seemingly unrelated factors.
The robustness of the statistical relationship unveiled in this analysis highlights the inherent dynamism between environmental conditions and the labor force dedicated to maintenance activities. The implications of these findings extend beyond their statistical significance, encompassing potential practical and policy considerations. The intricate dance between air quality and the workforce responsible for its upkeep yields an intriguing narrative that reverberates through the realms of both environmental management and labor dynamics.
These results underscore the significance of considering maintenance as a pivotal factor in environmental sustainability. As the proverbial saying goes, "clean air starts with clean maintenance." The symbiotic relationship between these variables invites further exploration and contemplation, carrying implications for a breath of fresh air in the discourse surrounding environmental quality and labor allocation.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation has disentangled the intricacies of the relationship between air pollution in Orlando and the number of maintenance workers and machinery in Florida, revealing a strikingly high correlation coefficient and a significant statistical association. The empirical evidence presented deftly illustrates the interconnectedness of seemingly incongruent elements, offering a breath of fresh air in the discourse surrounding environmental sustainability and labor dynamics.

These findings underscore the importance of maintenance as a catalyst for environmental stewardship, serving as a subtle reminder that "clean air starts with clean maintenance." It is evident that the intricate dance between air quality and the workforce responsible for its upkeep warrants thoughtful consideration and further study.

While our research has brought these nuances to the forefront, it is crucial to recognize the limitations inherent in our analysis. The complexity of environmental systems and labor dynamics may encompass additional variables and factors that have not been fully captured in our current study. Therefore, future investigations may benefit from a more comprehensive examination, delving into additional dimensions and potential mediating influences to enrich our understanding of this intricate relationship.

In light of the robust statistical evidence presented and the subtle humor skillfully interwoven throughout this inquiry, we assert that no further research in this area is needed. With a nod to the maintenance workers who keep our world turning, we conclude that this study offers a breath of fresh air in the realms of academic inquiry and the occasional whimsy in scholarly undertakings. Thus, we breathe easy, knowing that our work shall stand as a beacon of insight and wit in the annals of research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Air We Breathe: A Maintenance Matter. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Atmospheric Comedic Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Air We Breathe: A Maintenance Matter. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Atmospheric Well-being


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Air We Breathe: A Maintenance Matter with an abstract of The relationship between air pollution and the number of maintenance workers and machinery in the state of Florida has long been a topic of discovery. In this research, data from the Environmental Protection Agency and the Bureau of Labor Statistics was utilized to delve into this complex association. The findings revealed a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9171737 with a significance level of p < 0.01, indicating a strong statistical relationship. The implications of these results for the maintenance sector as well as air quality management are discussed, shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated factors. This study provides insight into the importance of maintenance and the breath of fresh air it can provide for environmental sustainability.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, maintenance workers, machinery, environmental protection agency, bureau of labor statistics, correlation coefficient, statistical relationship, air quality management, environmental sustainability

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Orlando
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Orlando-Kissimmee-Sanford, FL
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Orlando

The number of maintenance workers, machinery in Florida
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of maintenance workers, machinery in Florida
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of maintenance workers, machinery in Florida

Correlation r = 0.9171737 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8412076 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of maintenance workers, machinery in Florida) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Orlando) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.3E-8. 0.0000000128609746870233400000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 1.3E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 77,754,604 random variables You don't actually need 77 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.8, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Orlando (Bad air quality days)4.109593.825145.753426.301374.931511.639340.8219182.191783.287671.912570.8219180.5479450.2739730.2732240.8219180.8219181.64384000
The number of maintenance workers, machinery in Florida (Laborers)65305540693068505610450023802910294033202570215016801460116015301610164010502400




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([4.10959,3.82514,5.75342,6.30137,4.93151,1.63934,0.821918,2.19178,3.28767,1.91257,0.821918,0.547945,0.273973,0.273224,0.821918,0.821918,1.64384,0,0,0,])
array_2 = np.array([6530,5540,6930,6850,5610,4500,2380,2910,2940,3320,2570,2150,1680,1460,1160,1530,1610,1640,1050,2400,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Orlando"
array_2_name = "The number of maintenance workers, machinery in Florida"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is much appreciated!


Correlation ID: 2890 · Black Variable ID: 21011 · Red Variable ID: 6640
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0