about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,868 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Air pollution in Allentown and the second variable is Physical album shipment volume in the United States.  The chart goes from 1999 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The cleaner air in Allentown led to an influx of eco-friendly, paper-loving pigeons who had a knack for conducting smooth jazz orchestras. Their melodic tunes were so in demand that people ditched their usual music purchases, opting instead to listen to the pigeon-performed classics, thus decreasing the need for physical album shipments. Who knew the key to reducing physical album shipments lay in the talons of musical, environmentally-conscious pigeons in Allentown?

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image of a futuristic cyber folk town in bright, clear skies where people are jogging and cycling through the streets. Meanwhile, within the United States, show a sleek, tech-filled warehouse with diminishing physical album shipments. The contrast should highlight the collision of traditional and modern lifestyles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Air pollution in Allentown and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie a funny image macro Cyber folk a funny image you would see on reddit Scalar art
ChatGPT: Cyber folk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Air pollution in Allentown and Physical album shipment volume in the United States, in the following situation: Because with the decrease in air pollution in Allentown, people were finally able to go outside without needing a hazmat suit, so they started exercising and getting in shape. As a result, they didn't have time to sit around ordering physical albums online, causing the shipment volume to drop.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Allentown, the sky was clear as people jogged and cycled through the streets, breathing in the fresh air. On the other hand, in the United States, a warehouse sat with fewer physical albums stacked inside, as the shipment volume declined.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyber folk ] and depicting this scene: In Allentown, the sky was clear as people jogged and cycled through the streets, breathing in the fresh air. On the other hand, in the United States, a warehouse sat with fewer physical albums stacked inside, as the shipment volume declined. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image of a futuristic cyber folk town in bright, clear skies where people are jogging and cycling through the streets. Meanwhile, within the United States, show a sleek, tech-filled warehouse with diminishing physical album shipments. The contrast should highlight the collision of traditional and modern lifestyles.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Air pollution in Allentown caused Physical album shipment volume in the United States to decrease.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Breathing in the Hits: A Correlative Analysis of Air Pollution in Allentown and Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States

Journal of Atmospheric Musicology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Allentown and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Environmental Protection Agency and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9102048 and p < 0.01 for 1999 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Breathing in the Hits: A Correlative Analysis of Air Pollution in Allentown and Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between air pollution in Allentown and physical album shipment volume in the United States has long been a source of speculation, prompting us to delve into this musically-inclined façade of environmental economics. Through the use of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we performed a comprehensive correlative analysis spanning from 1999 to 2022. Astonishingly, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9102048 with p < 0.01, indicating a robust connection between air pollution levels and physical album shipments. Our research not only sheds light on the impact of air quality on consumer behavior but also uncovers a harmonious symphony of data that may leave you breathless.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Allentown and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breathing in the Hits: A Correlative Analysis of Air Pollution in Allentown and Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between air pollution in Allentown and physical album shipment volume in the United States has long been a source of speculation, prompting us to delve into this musically-inclined façade of environmental economics. Through the use of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we performed a comprehensive correlative analysis spanning from 1999 to 2022. Astonishingly, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9102048 with p < 0.01, indicating a robust connection between air pollution levels and physical album shipments. Our research not only sheds light on the impact of air quality on consumer behavior but also uncovers a harmonious symphony of data that may leave you breathless.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of environmental economics has long been characterized by a blend of serious, often somber discussions about the impact of pollution on our planet and lighthearted attempts to make light of dire circumstances. The relationship between air pollution and its effects on human health and behavior has been a topic of fervent research and debate. It is against this backdrop that we embark on a whimsical journey into the heart of this matter, specifically examining the unexpected correlation between air pollution in Allentown and the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States.

As researchers, we often find ourselves caught in the crosshairs of stern academic inquiry and the occasional desire to infuse levity into our work. Our investigation began with a curiosity sparked by the piquant aroma of freshly pressed vinyl records wafting through the industrial haze of urban centers. What could possibly link the smog-filled skies of Allentown to the musical preferences of consumers across the United States? While our inquiry may initially appear lighthearted, the implications of our findings are far-reaching, offering a unique glimpse into the intoxicating melody of economics, environment, and culture.

In the pursuit of substantiating this curious alliance, we combed through troves of data, stretching across time and space - from the dusty warehouses of record stores to the digital archives of environmental agencies. Our quest was not in vain, for the results we unearthed paint a vivid picture of an unexpected marriage between two seemingly unrelated realms. An air of intrigue, buoyed by the delightful cacophony of statistics, permeates the atmosphere as we gather to unravel the enigmatic correlation between Allentown's polluted air and the nation's predilection for physical albums.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Allentown and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breathing in the Hits: A Correlative Analysis of Air Pollution in Allentown and Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between air pollution in Allentown and physical album shipment volume in the United States has long been a source of speculation, prompting us to delve into this musically-inclined façade of environmental economics. Through the use of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we performed a comprehensive correlative analysis spanning from 1999 to 2022. Astonishingly, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9102048 with p < 0.01, indicating a robust connection between air pollution levels and physical album shipments. Our research not only sheds light on the impact of air quality on consumer behavior but also uncovers a harmonious symphony of data that may leave you breathless.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of environmental economics has long been characterized by a blend of serious, often somber discussions about the impact of pollution on our planet and lighthearted attempts to make light of dire circumstances. The relationship between air pollution and its effects on human health and behavior has been a topic of fervent research and debate. It is against this backdrop that we embark on a whimsical journey into the heart of this matter, specifically examining the unexpected correlation between air pollution in Allentown and the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States.
As researchers, we often find ourselves caught in the crosshairs of stern academic inquiry and the occasional desire to infuse levity into our work. Our investigation began with a curiosity sparked by the piquant aroma of freshly pressed vinyl records wafting through the industrial haze of urban centers. What could possibly link the smog-filled skies of Allentown to the musical preferences of consumers across the United States? While our inquiry may initially appear lighthearted, the implications of our findings are far-reaching, offering a unique glimpse into the intoxicating melody of economics, environment, and culture.
In the pursuit of substantiating this curious alliance, we combed through troves of data, stretching across time and space - from the dusty warehouses of record stores to the digital archives of environmental agencies. Our quest was not in vain, for the results we unearthed paint a vivid picture of an unexpected marriage between two seemingly unrelated realms. An air of intrigue, buoyed by the delightful cacophony of statistics, permeates the atmosphere as we gather to unravel the enigmatic correlation between Allentown's polluted air and the nation's predilection for physical albums.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "The Effects of Air Pollution on Human Health and Behavior" by Smith et al., the authors find a plethora of detrimental effects associated with air pollution, including respiratory diseases, cardiovascular issues, and decreased cognitive function. This serious literature highlights the dire consequences of air pollution on human well-being, grounding our investigation in the weighty reality of environmental impact.

Doe's "Economic Implications of Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States" delves into the shifting trends of music consumption, offering insights into the challenges and opportunities faced by the music industry in a digital age. The study strives to make sense of a world where streaming reigns supreme and physical formats struggle to maintain their relevance, painting a sobering picture of the market dynamics underpinning our analysis.

Jones' work, "Air Quality and Economic Behavior: A Holistic Approach," broadens the scope to explore the intricate interplay between environmental conditions and consumer behavior. The research elucidates the ways in which air quality can influence economic decisions, uncovering surprising correlations between smog-choked cities and consumer spending patterns. This scholarly exploration serves as a solid foundation for our study, highlighting the potential ramifications of air pollution on economic activities.

In "Vinyl Revival: The Resurgence of Physical Albums in the Digital Age" by Music Enthusiast, the authors provide an in-depth examination of the resurgence of vinyl records in contemporary music culture. This compelling read offers a window into the allure of physical albums, capturing the essence of their enduring appeal amidst the digital deluge. With a healthy dose of nostalgia and reverence for analog audio, this book sets the stage for our exploration of the curious dynamics within the realm of physical album shipments.

On the fictional front, "The Sound of Polluted Silence" by FictionalWriter and "The Smog Symphony" by ImaginaryAuthor offer whimsical narratives that intertwine atmospheric pollution and the world of music, conjuring fantastical tales where environmental hazards and musical harmony converge in unexpected ways. While these literary works exist purely in the realm of imagination, they add a touch of whimsy to our scholarly pursuits, inviting us to consider the surreal potentials of our research findings.

Internet memes such as the "Vinyls vs. Smog" meme and the "Music Lovers Can't Breathe in Allentown" meme have circulated online, drawing attention to the quirky juxtaposition of air quality concerns and musical inclinations. These online jests, while light-hearted, encapsulate the essence of our inquiry, encapsulating the amusing conundrum at the heart of our investigation.

In the pages that follow, we journey through a landscape that marries the serious with the fanciful, where scholarly inquiry meets the enchanting melodies that shape our consumer choices. Prepare to be immersed in a harmonious cacophony of data and whimsy as we unravel the melodic mysteries of air pollution and physical album shipments.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Allentown and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Statista . You used data from 1999 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breathing in the Hits: A Correlative Analysis of Air Pollution in Allentown and Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between air pollution in Allentown and physical album shipment volume in the United States has long been a source of speculation, prompting us to delve into this musically-inclined façade of environmental economics. Through the use of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we performed a comprehensive correlative analysis spanning from 1999 to 2022. Astonishingly, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9102048 with p < 0.01, indicating a robust connection between air pollution levels and physical album shipments. Our research not only sheds light on the impact of air quality on consumer behavior but also uncovers a harmonious symphony of data that may leave you breathless.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of environmental economics has long been characterized by a blend of serious, often somber discussions about the impact of pollution on our planet and lighthearted attempts to make light of dire circumstances. The relationship between air pollution and its effects on human health and behavior has been a topic of fervent research and debate. It is against this backdrop that we embark on a whimsical journey into the heart of this matter, specifically examining the unexpected correlation between air pollution in Allentown and the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States.
As researchers, we often find ourselves caught in the crosshairs of stern academic inquiry and the occasional desire to infuse levity into our work. Our investigation began with a curiosity sparked by the piquant aroma of freshly pressed vinyl records wafting through the industrial haze of urban centers. What could possibly link the smog-filled skies of Allentown to the musical preferences of consumers across the United States? While our inquiry may initially appear lighthearted, the implications of our findings are far-reaching, offering a unique glimpse into the intoxicating melody of economics, environment, and culture.
In the pursuit of substantiating this curious alliance, we combed through troves of data, stretching across time and space - from the dusty warehouses of record stores to the digital archives of environmental agencies. Our quest was not in vain, for the results we unearthed paint a vivid picture of an unexpected marriage between two seemingly unrelated realms. An air of intrigue, buoyed by the delightful cacophony of statistics, permeates the atmosphere as we gather to unravel the enigmatic correlation between Allentown's polluted air and the nation's predilection for physical albums.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the mysterious entanglement between air pollution in Allentown and the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States, our research team delved into the depths of data mining, statistical sorcery, and environmental alchemy. The methodology employed in this study was as intricate as a carefully orchestrated symphony, combining the precision of a maestro with the whimsy of a street musician.

Data Collection: We scoured the internet landscape like intrepid digital explorers, scavenging for morsels of information from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista. We harnessed the power of time, spanning our data collection from the ancient epoch of 1999 to the present day, 2022, to capture the ever-evolving harmony of environmental and musical phenomena. Our approach was akin to panning for gold in a digital river, sifting through layers of data sediment to uncover nuggets of statistical truth.

Air Pollution Metrics: The air pollution levels in Allentown were meticulously parsed from a cacophony of intricate measurements, including ambient air quality monitoring, emissions inventories, and chemical composition analyses. We cast our net wide, capturing data on various pollutants such as carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen dioxide, ozone, and particulate matter - a veritable orchestra of pollutants harmonizing within the atmospheric symphony of Allentown.

Physical Album Shipment Volume: The shipment volume of physical albums in the United States emerged as our musical crescendo, echoing across the vast expanse of consumer preferences. We harnessed the power of sales data, consumption patterns, and musical genre trends to chart the rise and fall of physical album shipments. Our journey through these musical metrics was akin to riding the rollercoaster of consumer demands, with peaks and valleys mirroring the ebb and flow of musical zeitgeist.

Correlative Analysis: Armed with our treasure trove of data, we unleashed the mighty power of statistical analysis to unravel the enigmatic connection between air pollution in Allentown and physical album shipment volume in the United States. Through the arcane arts of regression analysis, correlation coefficients, and hypothesis testing, we sought to distill the symphonic chaos of environmental and musical variables into a harmonious mathematical melody.

Limitations: Like any grand performance, our methodology was not without its limitations. The nuances of human behavior, the capricious winds of musical tastes, and the ever-shifting dynamics of environmental governance cast a shimmering haze over our results. Nonetheless, armed with the metaphorical baton of statistical rigor, we endeavored to conduct a nuanced analysis that would resonate within the hallowed halls of academia.

In summary, our methodology was an audacious blend of empirical rigor and whimsical curiosity, allowing us to unearth the melody hidden within the discordant cacophony of air pollution and physical album shipments.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Allentown and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Environmental Protection Agency and Statista .

For the time period 1999 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9102048, r-squared of 0.8284727, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Breathing in the Hits: A Correlative Analysis of Air Pollution in Allentown and Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between air pollution in Allentown and physical album shipment volume in the United States has long been a source of speculation, prompting us to delve into this musically-inclined façade of environmental economics. Through the use of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we performed a comprehensive correlative analysis spanning from 1999 to 2022. Astonishingly, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9102048 with p < 0.01, indicating a robust connection between air pollution levels and physical album shipments. Our research not only sheds light on the impact of air quality on consumer behavior but also uncovers a harmonious symphony of data that may leave you breathless.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of environmental economics has long been characterized by a blend of serious, often somber discussions about the impact of pollution on our planet and lighthearted attempts to make light of dire circumstances. The relationship between air pollution and its effects on human health and behavior has been a topic of fervent research and debate. It is against this backdrop that we embark on a whimsical journey into the heart of this matter, specifically examining the unexpected correlation between air pollution in Allentown and the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States.
As researchers, we often find ourselves caught in the crosshairs of stern academic inquiry and the occasional desire to infuse levity into our work. Our investigation began with a curiosity sparked by the piquant aroma of freshly pressed vinyl records wafting through the industrial haze of urban centers. What could possibly link the smog-filled skies of Allentown to the musical preferences of consumers across the United States? While our inquiry may initially appear lighthearted, the implications of our findings are far-reaching, offering a unique glimpse into the intoxicating melody of economics, environment, and culture.
In the pursuit of substantiating this curious alliance, we combed through troves of data, stretching across time and space - from the dusty warehouses of record stores to the digital archives of environmental agencies. Our quest was not in vain, for the results we unearthed paint a vivid picture of an unexpected marriage between two seemingly unrelated realms. An air of intrigue, buoyed by the delightful cacophony of statistics, permeates the atmosphere as we gather to unravel the enigmatic correlation between Allentown's polluted air and the nation's predilection for physical albums.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our analysis revealed a significant and robust correlation between air pollution in Allentown and physical album shipment volume in the United States. The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.9102048, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was 0.8284727, signifying that approximately 83% of the variance in physical album shipment volume can be explained by the variance in air pollution levels in Allentown. The statistical significance was also evident, with p < 0.01, further affirming the strength of the relationship uncovered in our analysis.

Figure 1 displays the strikingly clear relationship between the levels of air pollution in Allentown and the volume of physical album shipments in the United States, visually encapsulating the harmony between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The scatterplot graphically illustrates the strong positive correlation, lending credence to the surprising connection we have unveiled.

Our findings not only validate the longstanding speculation surrounding the link between air quality and consumer behavior but also provide a veritable feast for thought in the realms of economics, ecology, and music. While the result may seem as surprising as finding a saxophonist in a symphony of statistics, it underscores the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated aspects of our environment and cultural preferences.

In sum, our research offers a compelling glimpse into a discordant symphony of variables, revealing the sonorous blend of air pollution and physical album shipment volume. The findings, while intriguing, also emphasize the importance of considering environmental factors in the economic decisions of consumers and industries, adding a melodic note to the ongoing discourse in environmental economics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Allentown and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Breathing in the Hits: A Correlative Analysis of Air Pollution in Allentown and Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between air pollution in Allentown and physical album shipment volume in the United States has long been a source of speculation, prompting us to delve into this musically-inclined façade of environmental economics. Through the use of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we performed a comprehensive correlative analysis spanning from 1999 to 2022. Astonishingly, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9102048 with p < 0.01, indicating a robust connection between air pollution levels and physical album shipments. Our research not only sheds light on the impact of air quality on consumer behavior but also uncovers a harmonious symphony of data that may leave you breathless.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "The Effects of Air Pollution on Human Health and Behavior" by Smith et al., the authors find a plethora of detrimental effects associated with air pollution, including respiratory diseases, cardiovascular issues, and decreased cognitive function. This serious literature highlights the dire consequences of air pollution on human well-being, grounding our investigation in the weighty reality of environmental impact.
Doe's "Economic Implications of Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States" delves into the shifting trends of music consumption, offering insights into the challenges and opportunities faced by the music industry in a digital age. The study strives to make sense of a world where streaming reigns supreme and physical formats struggle to maintain their relevance, painting a sobering picture of the market dynamics underpinning our analysis.
Jones' work, "Air Quality and Economic Behavior: A Holistic Approach," broadens the scope to explore the intricate interplay between environmental conditions and consumer behavior. The research elucidates the ways in which air quality can influence economic decisions, uncovering surprising correlations between smog-choked cities and consumer spending patterns. This scholarly exploration serves as a solid foundation for our study, highlighting the potential ramifications of air pollution on economic activities.
In "Vinyl Revival: The Resurgence of Physical Albums in the Digital Age" by Music Enthusiast, the authors provide an in-depth examination of the resurgence of vinyl records in contemporary music culture. This compelling read offers a window into the allure of physical albums, capturing the essence of their enduring appeal amidst the digital deluge. With a healthy dose of nostalgia and reverence for analog audio, this book sets the stage for our exploration of the curious dynamics within the realm of physical album shipments.
On the fictional front, "The Sound of Polluted Silence" by FictionalWriter and "The Smog Symphony" by ImaginaryAuthor offer whimsical narratives that intertwine atmospheric pollution and the world of music, conjuring fantastical tales where environmental hazards and musical harmony converge in unexpected ways. While these literary works exist purely in the realm of imagination, they add a touch of whimsy to our scholarly pursuits, inviting us to consider the surreal potentials of our research findings.
Internet memes such as the "Vinyls vs. Smog" meme and the "Music Lovers Can't Breathe in Allentown" meme have circulated online, drawing attention to the quirky juxtaposition of air quality concerns and musical inclinations. These online jests, while light-hearted, encapsulate the essence of our inquiry, encapsulating the amusing conundrum at the heart of our investigation.
In the pages that follow, we journey through a landscape that marries the serious with the fanciful, where scholarly inquiry meets the enchanting melodies that shape our consumer choices. Prepare to be immersed in a harmonious cacophony of data and whimsy as we unravel the melodic mysteries of air pollution and physical album shipments.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a significant and robust correlation between air pollution in Allentown and physical album shipment volume in the United States. The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.9102048, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was 0.8284727, signifying that approximately 83% of the variance in physical album shipment volume can be explained by the variance in air pollution levels in Allentown. The statistical significance was also evident, with p < 0.01, further affirming the strength of the relationship uncovered in our analysis.
Figure 1 displays the strikingly clear relationship between the levels of air pollution in Allentown and the volume of physical album shipments in the United States, visually encapsulating the harmony between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The scatterplot graphically illustrates the strong positive correlation, lending credence to the surprising connection we have unveiled.
Our findings not only validate the longstanding speculation surrounding the link between air quality and consumer behavior but also provide a veritable feast for thought in the realms of economics, ecology, and music. While the result may seem as surprising as finding a saxophonist in a symphony of statistics, it underscores the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated aspects of our environment and cultural preferences.
In sum, our research offers a compelling glimpse into a discordant symphony of variables, revealing the sonorous blend of air pollution and physical album shipment volume. The findings, while intriguing, also emphasize the importance of considering environmental factors in the economic decisions of consumers and industries, adding a melodic note to the ongoing discourse in environmental economics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study echo the underlying themes and nuances highlighted in the literature review, albeit with a symphonic twist that may have left traditional scholars humming a new tune. Smith et al.'s work on the health and behavioral impacts of air pollution serves as a stark reminder of the serious consequences of compromised air quality, and our study's revelation of a strong correlation between this very air pollution and physical album shipment volume in the United States is a harmonious addition to this somber melody.

Doe's exploration of economic implications within the music industry in the digital age, while grounded in market dynamics, may not have anticipated such a magnificent crescendo to our findings. Our robust correlation coefficient successfully harmonizes with Jones' holistic approach to uncovering the relationship between environmental conditions and consumer behavior, lending our study a compelling rhythm that resonates within the intersection of economics and environmental factors.

The whimsical elements brought forth in the literature review, such as the fictional narratives woven around atmospheric pollution and music, have unexpectedly found a hint of resonance in our serious empirical investigation. As our results echo the melodic mysteries of air pollution and physical album shipments, one might contend that the surreal potentials of these literary works are not entirely fictional. After all, reality can sometimes be stranger than fiction—like finding a trumpet player in a tornado!

Moreover, the lighthearted internet memes that encapsulated the juxtaposition of air quality concerns and musical inclinations have taken on a newfound layer of seriousness, as our findings dance to the beat of a strong statistical significance. This provides a playful reminder that humor, when backed by robust data, can strike a chord of truth in unexpected ways.

In conclusion, the correlation between air pollution in Allentown and physical album shipment volume in the United States is not just a one-hit wonder; it's a chart-topping revelation that underscores the serendipitous symphony of variables in our economic and environmental landscape. Our study injects a dollop of whimsy into the staid world of empirical analysis, reminding us that the world of research can indeed be both serious and delightfully absurd.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Air pollution in Allentown and Physical album shipment volume in the United States. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Breathing in the Hits: A Correlative Analysis of Air Pollution in Allentown and Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
The correlation between air pollution in Allentown and physical album shipment volume in the United States has long been a source of speculation, prompting us to delve into this musically-inclined façade of environmental economics. Through the use of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we performed a comprehensive correlative analysis spanning from 1999 to 2022. Astonishingly, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9102048 with p < 0.01, indicating a robust connection between air pollution levels and physical album shipments. Our research not only sheds light on the impact of air quality on consumer behavior but also uncovers a harmonious symphony of data that may leave you breathless.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of environmental economics has long been characterized by a blend of serious, often somber discussions about the impact of pollution on our planet and lighthearted attempts to make light of dire circumstances. The relationship between air pollution and its effects on human health and behavior has been a topic of fervent research and debate. It is against this backdrop that we embark on a whimsical journey into the heart of this matter, specifically examining the unexpected correlation between air pollution in Allentown and the shipment volume of physical albums in the United States.
As researchers, we often find ourselves caught in the crosshairs of stern academic inquiry and the occasional desire to infuse levity into our work. Our investigation began with a curiosity sparked by the piquant aroma of freshly pressed vinyl records wafting through the industrial haze of urban centers. What could possibly link the smog-filled skies of Allentown to the musical preferences of consumers across the United States? While our inquiry may initially appear lighthearted, the implications of our findings are far-reaching, offering a unique glimpse into the intoxicating melody of economics, environment, and culture.
In the pursuit of substantiating this curious alliance, we combed through troves of data, stretching across time and space - from the dusty warehouses of record stores to the digital archives of environmental agencies. Our quest was not in vain, for the results we unearthed paint a vivid picture of an unexpected marriage between two seemingly unrelated realms. An air of intrigue, buoyed by the delightful cacophony of statistics, permeates the atmosphere as we gather to unravel the enigmatic correlation between Allentown's polluted air and the nation's predilection for physical albums.

[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a significant and robust correlation between air pollution in Allentown and physical album shipment volume in the United States. The correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.9102048, indicating a strong positive relationship between these two variables. Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) was 0.8284727, signifying that approximately 83% of the variance in physical album shipment volume can be explained by the variance in air pollution levels in Allentown. The statistical significance was also evident, with p < 0.01, further affirming the strength of the relationship uncovered in our analysis.
Figure 1 displays the strikingly clear relationship between the levels of air pollution in Allentown and the volume of physical album shipments in the United States, visually encapsulating the harmony between these seemingly disparate phenomena. The scatterplot graphically illustrates the strong positive correlation, lending credence to the surprising connection we have unveiled.
Our findings not only validate the longstanding speculation surrounding the link between air quality and consumer behavior but also provide a veritable feast for thought in the realms of economics, ecology, and music. While the result may seem as surprising as finding a saxophonist in a symphony of statistics, it underscores the interconnectedness of seemingly unrelated aspects of our environment and cultural preferences.
In sum, our research offers a compelling glimpse into a discordant symphony of variables, revealing the sonorous blend of air pollution and physical album shipment volume. The findings, while intriguing, also emphasize the importance of considering environmental factors in the economic decisions of consumers and industries, adding a melodic note to the ongoing discourse in environmental economics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we draw the curtains on our melodious journey through the intertwined realms of air pollution and physical album shipments, it becomes evident that the relationship between the two is not just a one-hit wonder, but a chart-topping sensation. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9102048 with p < 0.01 serves as a resounding crescendo, affirming the harmonious symphony of data that illuminates this peculiar connection. It's as if the smog of Allentown has orchestrated a grand symphony that reverberates through the very fabric of our consumer behaviors.

Our findings not only strike a chord with the ongoing discourse in environmental economics but also underscore the need to consider the aria of air quality in the economic decisions of consumers and industries. As the dust settles on our statistical overture, it is evident that the seemingly discordant notes of pollution and album shipments weave a duet that resonates deeply within the annals of economic and environmental research.

In the spirit of a grand finale, we assert, without treble, that no further research is required in this area. The ballad of air pollution and album shipments has been played, and the applause, though silent, resounds through the corridors of academia. So, let us bid adieu to this curious alliance, knowing that while the connection may seem as unlikely as a jazz rendition of a Beethoven symphony, it speaks to the intertwined melody of environmental factors and consumer preferences—a tune that will echo through the hallowed halls of academic inquiry for years to come.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Breathing in the Hits: A Correlative Analysis of Air Pollution in Allentown and Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Atmospheric Musicology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Breathing in the Hits: A Correlative Analysis of Air Pollution in Allentown and Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for Sonic Atmospheric Research and Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Breathing in the Hits: A Correlative Analysis of Air Pollution in Allentown and Physical Album Shipment Volume in the United States with an abstract of The correlation between air pollution in Allentown and physical album shipment volume in the United States has long been a source of speculation, prompting us to delve into this musically-inclined façade of environmental economics. Through the use of data from the Environmental Protection Agency and Statista, we performed a comprehensive correlative analysis spanning from 1999 to 2022. Astonishingly, our findings revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9102048 with p < 0.01, indicating a robust connection between air pollution levels and physical album shipments. Our research not only sheds light on the impact of air quality on consumer behavior but also uncovers a harmonious symphony of data that may leave you breathless.

ChatGPT:

air pollution, Allentown, physical album shipment, correlation analysis, environmental economics, Environmental Protection Agency, Statista, consumer behavior, air quality, United States, shipment volume, music industry

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Air pollution in Allentown
Detailed data title: Percentage of days with air quality at 'unhealthy for sensitive groups' or worse in Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, PA-NJ
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Allentown

Physical album shipment volume in the United States
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Physical album shipment volume in the United States

Correlation r = 0.9102048 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8284727 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Physical album shipment volume in the United States) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Air pollution in Allentown) over the 24 years from 1999 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.9E-10. 0.0000000006928591759713318000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 6.9E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,443,294,734 random variables You don't actually need 1 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 23 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 23 because we have two variables measured over a period of 24 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.8, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Air pollution in Allentown (Bad air quality days)12.32889.0163913.698612.60278.219188.196729.04114.931518.767125.191260.8219187.397263.835624.644812.739730.8219181.643843.005460.2739731.369861.095890.2732241.095890.547945
Physical album shipment volume in the United States (Units)93890000094250000088190000080330000074600000076700000070540000061970000051110000036840000029290000025300000024080000019820000017220000014280000012290000097600000877000005200000047500000316000004670000033400000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([12.3288,9.01639,13.6986,12.6027,8.21918,8.19672,9.0411,4.93151,8.76712,5.19126,0.821918,7.39726,3.83562,4.64481,2.73973,0.821918,1.64384,3.00546,0.273973,1.36986,1.09589,0.273224,1.09589,0.547945,])
array_2 = np.array([938900000,942500000,881900000,803300000,746000000,767000000,705400000,619700000,511100000,368400000,292900000,253000000,240800000,198200000,172200000,142800000,122900000,97600000,87700000,52000000,47500000,31600000,46700000,33400000,])
array_1_name = "Air pollution in Allentown"
array_2_name = "Physical album shipment volume in the United States"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm genuinely thankful for your rating!


Correlation ID: 2868 · Black Variable ID: 20256 · Red Variable ID: 155
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0