about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,854 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn and the second variable is Air pollution in Springfield, Missouri.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2007, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The corn stalks were feeling a bit husky and kept letting out ear-piercing emissions, leading to a maize of air pollution in Springfield.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a TIME magazine cover with a bustling kitchen in Springfield, Missouri as the scene. In the background, towering GMO cornstalks loom, and the streets are filled with the tempting aroma of freshly baked treats made from abundant corn syrup. Eager bakers are shown whipping up batches of cookies, cakes, and pastries, while the constant hum of ovens fills the air, causing a thick haze of air pollution to hang over the city. The image should capture the vibrancy of the kitchen, the looming cornstalks, and the allure of the baked goods. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn and Air pollution in Springfield, Missouri. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Celtic art a funny image you would see on reddit A TIME magazine cover image Data cyber art
ChatGPT: A TIME magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn and Air pollution in Springfield, Missouri, in the following situation: Because the GMO corn started producing so much extra corn syrup, the citizens of Springfield, Missouri couldn't resist the temptation of making an excessive amount of corn syrup-based treats. This led to an increase in baking, which in turn led to an increase in the use of ovens and ultimately air pollution. So really, it's all about the dough – or rather, the corn syrup dough!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling kitchen in Springfield, Missouri, a field of towering GMO cornstalks looms in the background. The streets are filled with the tempting aroma of freshly baked treats made from the abundant corn syrup, as eager bakers whip up batches of cookies, cakes, and pastries. The constant hum of ovens fills the air, causing a thick haze of air pollution to hang over the city.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A TIME magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling kitchen in Springfield, Missouri, a field of towering GMO cornstalks looms in the background. The streets are filled with the tempting aroma of freshly baked treats made from the abundant corn syrup, as eager bakers whip up batches of cookies, cakes, and pastries. The constant hum of ovens fills the air, causing a thick haze of air pollution to hang over the city. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a TIME magazine cover with a bustling kitchen in Springfield, Missouri as the scene. In the background, towering GMO cornstalks loom, and the streets are filled with the tempting aroma of freshly baked treats made from abundant corn syrup. Eager bakers are shown whipping up batches of cookies, cakes, and pastries, while the constant hum of ovens fills the air, causing a thick haze of air pollution to hang over the city. The image should capture the vibrancy of the kitchen, the looming cornstalks, and the allure of the baked goods.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn caused Air pollution in Springfield, Missouri to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.05)
Maizey Air: The GMO-Gas Connection in Springfield, Missouri

Journal of Agroecological Biophysics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Air pollution in Springfield, Missouri. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Environmental Protection Agency to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7937720 and p < 0.05 for 2000 to 2007.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Maizey Air: The GMO-Gas Connection in Springfield, Missouri"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the potentially corny relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and levels of air pollution in Springfield, Missouri. Leveraging data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), we performed a rigorous statistical analysis to examine the correlation between GMO corn cultivation and air quality in this quintessentially Midwestern city. Our findings reveal a tight cob-nectedness, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7937720 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years spanning from 2000 to 2007. These results suggest that, much like kernels popping in a hot pan, the use of GMOs in corn may be contributing to the atmospheric conditions in Springfield. Our study sheds light on this ear-resistible link and underscores the importance of further probing the agricultural impact on urban air pollution.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Air pollution in Springfield, Missouri. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Maizey Air: The GMO-Gas Connection in Springfield, Missouri"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the potentially corny relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and levels of air pollution in Springfield, Missouri. Leveraging data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), we performed a rigorous statistical analysis to examine the correlation between GMO corn cultivation and air quality in this quintessentially Midwestern city. Our findings reveal a tight cob-nectedness, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7937720 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years spanning from 2000 to 2007. These results suggest that, much like kernels popping in a hot pan, the use of GMOs in corn may be contributing to the atmospheric conditions in Springfield. Our study sheds light on this ear-resistible link and underscores the importance of further probing the agricultural impact on urban air pollution.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
INTRODUCTION

The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a hot topic, sparking debates that are as heated as a thousand kernels in a popcorn maker. One area of interest is the potential impact of GMO corn cultivation on air quality, particularly in urban settings where the air is as bustling as a farmer's market on a Saturday morning. In this paper, we delve into the heart of the heartland to investigate the relationship between GMO corn and air pollution in Springfield, Missouri.

Springfield, with its rolling acres of farmland and bustling urban life, serves as an ideal backdrop for our study. It's a place where you're just as likely to come across a tractor on the street as you are a taco truck. With its inherent charm and sprinkling of cornfields, Springfield provides the perfect setting to explore the intersection of agricultural practices and atmospheric conditions.

As our investigation unfolds, we'll navigate through the corn maze of data, pitting statistics against starchy speculation to uncover whether the use of GMOs in corn production has indeed left its imprint on the city's air quality. We'll sift through the kernels of information, separating the corn from the chaff, and attempt to crack the mystery behind the potential impact of GM crops on the air we breathe.

So buckle up, grab a cob of corn, and join us as we venture into the cornfields of science and air pollution. Our findings promise to be as intriguing as a corncob gun at a county fair, and perhaps as surprising as finding a GMO-free taco stand in a sea of genetically modified corn.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Air pollution in Springfield, Missouri. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Maizey Air: The GMO-Gas Connection in Springfield, Missouri"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the potentially corny relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and levels of air pollution in Springfield, Missouri. Leveraging data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), we performed a rigorous statistical analysis to examine the correlation between GMO corn cultivation and air quality in this quintessentially Midwestern city. Our findings reveal a tight cob-nectedness, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7937720 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years spanning from 2000 to 2007. These results suggest that, much like kernels popping in a hot pan, the use of GMOs in corn may be contributing to the atmospheric conditions in Springfield. Our study sheds light on this ear-resistible link and underscores the importance of further probing the agricultural impact on urban air pollution.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a hot topic, sparking debates that are as heated as a thousand kernels in a popcorn maker. One area of interest is the potential impact of GMO corn cultivation on air quality, particularly in urban settings where the air is as bustling as a farmer's market on a Saturday morning. In this paper, we delve into the heart of the heartland to investigate the relationship between GMO corn and air pollution in Springfield, Missouri.
Springfield, with its rolling acres of farmland and bustling urban life, serves as an ideal backdrop for our study. It's a place where you're just as likely to come across a tractor on the street as you are a taco truck. With its inherent charm and sprinkling of cornfields, Springfield provides the perfect setting to explore the intersection of agricultural practices and atmospheric conditions.
As our investigation unfolds, we'll navigate through the corn maze of data, pitting statistics against starchy speculation to uncover whether the use of GMOs in corn production has indeed left its imprint on the city's air quality. We'll sift through the kernels of information, separating the corn from the chaff, and attempt to crack the mystery behind the potential impact of GM crops on the air we breathe.
So buckle up, grab a cob of corn, and join us as we venture into the cornfields of science and air pollution. Our findings promise to be as intriguing as a corncob gun at a county fair, and perhaps as surprising as finding a GMO-free taco stand in a sea of genetically modified corn.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The potential relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and air pollution in Springfield, Missouri has garnered the attention of researchers in recent years. The investigation into this corn-undrum has been as intricate as unraveling a spool of maize silk, with multifaceted implications for both agricultural practices and urban environmental quality. Smith (2015) conducted a comprehensive study examining the impact of GMO corn cultivation on atmospheric composition, highlighting the need for a closer examination of the emissions associated with corn production.

Expanding on the agricultural influence, Doe (2018) expounded on the potential dispersion of GMO-related particulate matter originating from cornfields and its subsequent contribution to urban air pollution. In a similar vein, Jones (2019) explored the interplay between genetically engineered traits in corn and their interaction with atmospheric pollutants, positing intriguing correlations between GMO emissions and air quality shifts.

Drawing from this scholarly foundation, it is essential to consider the broader implications of GMO cultivation and air pollution. Delving into non-fiction works, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan presents a cornucopia of insights into the multifaceted impacts of corn production on our environment and food systems. "The Nature of Corn" by Richard L. Ford provides an in-depth exploration of the biological and ecological intricacies of this starchy staple, shedding light on the potential interactions between GMO corn and environmental factors.

In the realm of fiction, the works of John Grisham, with titles like "The Brethren" and "The Runaway Jury," may not immediately seem relevant to this research topic. However, as we navigate through the labyrinth of literature, we must consider the unpredictable ways in which seemingly unrelated stories can intersect. Akin to unruly cornstalks in a field, these narratives may offer unexpected parallels to the interconnectedness of agricultural practices and urban environmental dynamics.

Venturing further into the realm of unconventional research, this review encompasses an eclectic analysis of diverse sources, spanning from scholarly articles to whimsical musings found in the margins of old cookbooks and even obscure references gleaned from the cryptic engravings of ancient maize artifacts. It's worth noting, as an aside, that an exhaustive investigation into the potential impact of GMO corn on air pollution led to the unexpected discovery that CVS receipts, unrolled end to end, are approximately as long as the combined height of 37 cornstalks – a corn-founding revelation indeed.

As we navigate this scholarly cornucopia, the authors invite readers to embark on a riveting journey through the fields of research, where kernels of wisdom are harvested among the rows of erudition. In the next section, we present the methodology employed to husk and shuck the data, peeling back the layers of inquiry to reveal the cob-nectedness between genetically modified corn and atmospheric conditions in Springfield, Missouri.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Air pollution in Springfield, Missouri. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Environmental Protection Agency . You used data from 2000 to 2007

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Maizey Air: The GMO-Gas Connection in Springfield, Missouri"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the potentially corny relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and levels of air pollution in Springfield, Missouri. Leveraging data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), we performed a rigorous statistical analysis to examine the correlation between GMO corn cultivation and air quality in this quintessentially Midwestern city. Our findings reveal a tight cob-nectedness, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7937720 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years spanning from 2000 to 2007. These results suggest that, much like kernels popping in a hot pan, the use of GMOs in corn may be contributing to the atmospheric conditions in Springfield. Our study sheds light on this ear-resistible link and underscores the importance of further probing the agricultural impact on urban air pollution.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a hot topic, sparking debates that are as heated as a thousand kernels in a popcorn maker. One area of interest is the potential impact of GMO corn cultivation on air quality, particularly in urban settings where the air is as bustling as a farmer's market on a Saturday morning. In this paper, we delve into the heart of the heartland to investigate the relationship between GMO corn and air pollution in Springfield, Missouri.
Springfield, with its rolling acres of farmland and bustling urban life, serves as an ideal backdrop for our study. It's a place where you're just as likely to come across a tractor on the street as you are a taco truck. With its inherent charm and sprinkling of cornfields, Springfield provides the perfect setting to explore the intersection of agricultural practices and atmospheric conditions.
As our investigation unfolds, we'll navigate through the corn maze of data, pitting statistics against starchy speculation to uncover whether the use of GMOs in corn production has indeed left its imprint on the city's air quality. We'll sift through the kernels of information, separating the corn from the chaff, and attempt to crack the mystery behind the potential impact of GM crops on the air we breathe.
So buckle up, grab a cob of corn, and join us as we venture into the cornfields of science and air pollution. Our findings promise to be as intriguing as a corncob gun at a county fair, and perhaps as surprising as finding a GMO-free taco stand in a sea of genetically modified corn.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

To unearth the potential link between GMO corn and air pollution in Springfield, Missouri, we employed a methodology as intricate as untangling a kernel-laden strand of corn silk. Leveraging data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), we donned our metaphorical farmer's hats and set out to harvest information from the years 2000 to 2007 – a period reminiscent of the heyday of cornfields and likely a few gas emissions in Springfield.

Our first task was to gather data on GMO corn cultivation in Springfield. We scoured the USDA's digital fields, navigating through the virtual stalks of online databases to glean information on the extent of GMO corn cultivation. Much like segregating corn from the cob, we carefully extracted relevant data and scrutinized cultivation trends, paying particular attention to the adoption rate of GMO corn varieties.

Next, we turned our attention to the atmospheric realm, delving into data from the EPA like intrepid explorers venturing into uncharted air currents. We wrestled with wind patterns and pollution measurements, seeking to capture the ethereal evidence of any relationship between GMO corn use and air quality in Springfield. The resulting data, much like a ripe ear of corn ready for harvest, was ripe for statistical analysis.

With our data in hand, we somersaulted into the world of statistical analysis, employing sophisticated techniques like a well-oiled combine harvester in a cornfield. We crafted scatter plots and cultivated correlation coefficients, seeking to unveil the cob-nectedness between GMO corn cultivation and air pollution in Springfield. Our statistical arsenal included Pearson's correlation coefficient, and we applied it with the precision of a farm-to-table chef plating a dish.

In addition to quantitative analysis, we complemented our statistical foray with qualitative insights – interviewing experts in the fields of agriculture and atmospheric science. Their perspectives added layers to our investigation, much like the silken layers of a corncob adding texture and flavor to a dish.

Lastly, we performed sensitivity analyses to ensure the robustness of our findings, akin to inspecting the resilience of a corn stalk against the onslaught of a summer storm. Our methodology stood firm, ready to weather any uncertainty much like a resilient maize plant in a field.

In summary, our methodology was as intricate as the maze of a cornfield, navigating through data fields and statistical pathways to unveil the potential connection between GMO corn and air pollution in Springfield. With a blend of quantitative rigor and qualitative insights, our approach sought to shed light on this seemingly ear-resistible linkage.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Air pollution in Springfield, Missouri. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Environmental Protection Agency .

For the time period 2000 to 2007, you found a correlation 0.7937720, r-squared of 0.6300740, and p < 0.05.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Maizey Air: The GMO-Gas Connection in Springfield, Missouri"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the potentially corny relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and levels of air pollution in Springfield, Missouri. Leveraging data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), we performed a rigorous statistical analysis to examine the correlation between GMO corn cultivation and air quality in this quintessentially Midwestern city. Our findings reveal a tight cob-nectedness, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7937720 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years spanning from 2000 to 2007. These results suggest that, much like kernels popping in a hot pan, the use of GMOs in corn may be contributing to the atmospheric conditions in Springfield. Our study sheds light on this ear-resistible link and underscores the importance of further probing the agricultural impact on urban air pollution.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
INTRODUCTION
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a hot topic, sparking debates that are as heated as a thousand kernels in a popcorn maker. One area of interest is the potential impact of GMO corn cultivation on air quality, particularly in urban settings where the air is as bustling as a farmer's market on a Saturday morning. In this paper, we delve into the heart of the heartland to investigate the relationship between GMO corn and air pollution in Springfield, Missouri.
Springfield, with its rolling acres of farmland and bustling urban life, serves as an ideal backdrop for our study. It's a place where you're just as likely to come across a tractor on the street as you are a taco truck. With its inherent charm and sprinkling of cornfields, Springfield provides the perfect setting to explore the intersection of agricultural practices and atmospheric conditions.
As our investigation unfolds, we'll navigate through the corn maze of data, pitting statistics against starchy speculation to uncover whether the use of GMOs in corn production has indeed left its imprint on the city's air quality. We'll sift through the kernels of information, separating the corn from the chaff, and attempt to crack the mystery behind the potential impact of GM crops on the air we breathe.
So buckle up, grab a cob of corn, and join us as we venture into the cornfields of science and air pollution. Our findings promise to be as intriguing as a corncob gun at a county fair, and perhaps as surprising as finding a GMO-free taco stand in a sea of genetically modified corn.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

RESULTS

The statistical analysis revealed a corn-nection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and levels of air pollution in Springfield, Missouri from 2000 to 2007. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.7937720, indicating a strong positive relationship between the extent of GMO corn cultivation and air pollution levels in the city. In addition, the r-squared value of 0.6300740 suggests that approximately 63% of the variation in air pollution can be explained by the variation in GMO corn use. This relationship was found to be statistically significant, with a p-value of less than 0.05, providing evidence that the observed association is unlikely to have occurred by chance.

Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating the unmistakable positive correlation between the variables. The upward trend in the data points resembles the trajectory of a popcorn kernel ascending from the depths of a hot pan, revealing a compelling narrative of the potential influence of GMO corn on the atmospheric conditions in Springfield.

These findings purport that the use of GMOs in corn production may not only be contributing to the city's agricultural landscape but also leaving its mark on the air quality, much like a wayward kernel of corn in a field of hay. The implications of this research are as striking as the realization that one has mistakenly bitten into a raw corn kernel, and they call for further exploration into the interplay between agricultural practices and urban air pollution.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Air pollution in Springfield, Missouri. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Maizey Air: The GMO-Gas Connection in Springfield, Missouri"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the potentially corny relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and levels of air pollution in Springfield, Missouri. Leveraging data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), we performed a rigorous statistical analysis to examine the correlation between GMO corn cultivation and air quality in this quintessentially Midwestern city. Our findings reveal a tight cob-nectedness, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7937720 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years spanning from 2000 to 2007. These results suggest that, much like kernels popping in a hot pan, the use of GMOs in corn may be contributing to the atmospheric conditions in Springfield. Our study sheds light on this ear-resistible link and underscores the importance of further probing the agricultural impact on urban air pollution.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The potential relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and air pollution in Springfield, Missouri has garnered the attention of researchers in recent years. The investigation into this corn-undrum has been as intricate as unraveling a spool of maize silk, with multifaceted implications for both agricultural practices and urban environmental quality. Smith (2015) conducted a comprehensive study examining the impact of GMO corn cultivation on atmospheric composition, highlighting the need for a closer examination of the emissions associated with corn production.
Expanding on the agricultural influence, Doe (2018) expounded on the potential dispersion of GMO-related particulate matter originating from cornfields and its subsequent contribution to urban air pollution. In a similar vein, Jones (2019) explored the interplay between genetically engineered traits in corn and their interaction with atmospheric pollutants, positing intriguing correlations between GMO emissions and air quality shifts.
Drawing from this scholarly foundation, it is essential to consider the broader implications of GMO cultivation and air pollution. Delving into non-fiction works, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan presents a cornucopia of insights into the multifaceted impacts of corn production on our environment and food systems. "The Nature of Corn" by Richard L. Ford provides an in-depth exploration of the biological and ecological intricacies of this starchy staple, shedding light on the potential interactions between GMO corn and environmental factors.
In the realm of fiction, the works of John Grisham, with titles like "The Brethren" and "The Runaway Jury," may not immediately seem relevant to this research topic. However, as we navigate through the labyrinth of literature, we must consider the unpredictable ways in which seemingly unrelated stories can intersect. Akin to unruly cornstalks in a field, these narratives may offer unexpected parallels to the interconnectedness of agricultural practices and urban environmental dynamics.
Venturing further into the realm of unconventional research, this review encompasses an eclectic analysis of diverse sources, spanning from scholarly articles to whimsical musings found in the margins of old cookbooks and even obscure references gleaned from the cryptic engravings of ancient maize artifacts. It's worth noting, as an aside, that an exhaustive investigation into the potential impact of GMO corn on air pollution led to the unexpected discovery that CVS receipts, unrolled end to end, are approximately as long as the combined height of 37 cornstalks – a corn-founding revelation indeed.
As we navigate this scholarly cornucopia, the authors invite readers to embark on a riveting journey through the fields of research, where kernels of wisdom are harvested among the rows of erudition. In the next section, we present the methodology employed to husk and shuck the data, peeling back the layers of inquiry to reveal the cob-nectedness between genetically modified corn and atmospheric conditions in Springfield, Missouri.

[[RESULTS]]
RESULTS
The statistical analysis revealed a corn-nection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and levels of air pollution in Springfield, Missouri from 2000 to 2007. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.7937720, indicating a strong positive relationship between the extent of GMO corn cultivation and air pollution levels in the city. In addition, the r-squared value of 0.6300740 suggests that approximately 63% of the variation in air pollution can be explained by the variation in GMO corn use. This relationship was found to be statistically significant, with a p-value of less than 0.05, providing evidence that the observed association is unlikely to have occurred by chance.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating the unmistakable positive correlation between the variables. The upward trend in the data points resembles the trajectory of a popcorn kernel ascending from the depths of a hot pan, revealing a compelling narrative of the potential influence of GMO corn on the atmospheric conditions in Springfield.
These findings purport that the use of GMOs in corn production may not only be contributing to the city's agricultural landscape but also leaving its mark on the air quality, much like a wayward kernel of corn in a field of hay. The implications of this research are as striking as the realization that one has mistakenly bitten into a raw corn kernel, and they call for further exploration into the interplay between agricultural practices and urban air pollution.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of this study substantiate the findings of previous research, reaffirming the ear-resistible link between GMO corn cultivation and air pollution in Springfield, Missouri. Building upon the intriguing works by Smith (2015), Doe (2018), and Jones (2019), our research provides empirical evidence supporting their propositions regarding the influence of GMO-related particulate matter on urban atmospheric conditions. It is fascinating to consider the interconnectedness of these seemingly disparate elements—genetically engineered corn and the quality of the air we breathe, much like characters in a Grisham novel unexpectedly intersecting in the courtroom.

Delving into the nuances of GMO cultivation and its potential impact on air pollution, it is essential to recognize the multifaceted nature of this corn-undrum. The r-squared value of 0.6300740 suggests that approximately 63% of the variation in air pollution can be explained by variations in GMO corn use, underscoring the substantial impact of agricultural practices on urban environmental dynamics. This cob-nectedness, resembling the unearthing of ancient maize artifacts in the cryptic engravings of literature, points to the need for further probing into the agriculture-air pollution interface.

The scatterplot, akin to a visual representation of kernels of wisdom scattered among the rows of data, vividly portrays the unmistakable positive correlation between GMO corn cultivation and air pollution levels. The upward trend of the data points traces a narrative as compelling as the unfolding of "The Omnivore's Dilemma," shedding light on the potential influence of GMO corn on the atmospheric conditions in Springfield. This correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7937720 and a p-value of less than 0.05, reinforces the notion that the observed association is unlikely to have occurred by chance, much like the serendipitous discovery of a maize artifact in an unexpected historical site.

Therefore, our findings not only corroborate the existing body of research but also introduce a kernel of empirical evidence to the scholarly cornucopia, accentuating the need for continued exploration of the impact of GMO corn production on urban air quality. As we unravel the spool of maize silk in our quest for understanding, it becomes evident that the implications of this research stretch as far and wide as a cornfield in the heartland, offering a ripe opportunity for further cultivation of knowledge in this intriguing domain.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn and Air pollution in Springfield, Missouri. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Maizey Air: The GMO-Gas Connection in Springfield, Missouri"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we investigate the potentially corny relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and levels of air pollution in Springfield, Missouri. Leveraging data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), we performed a rigorous statistical analysis to examine the correlation between GMO corn cultivation and air quality in this quintessentially Midwestern city. Our findings reveal a tight cob-nectedness, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7937720 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years spanning from 2000 to 2007. These results suggest that, much like kernels popping in a hot pan, the use of GMOs in corn may be contributing to the atmospheric conditions in Springfield. Our study sheds light on this ear-resistible link and underscores the importance of further probing the agricultural impact on urban air pollution.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
INTRODUCTION
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agriculture has been a hot topic, sparking debates that are as heated as a thousand kernels in a popcorn maker. One area of interest is the potential impact of GMO corn cultivation on air quality, particularly in urban settings where the air is as bustling as a farmer's market on a Saturday morning. In this paper, we delve into the heart of the heartland to investigate the relationship between GMO corn and air pollution in Springfield, Missouri.
Springfield, with its rolling acres of farmland and bustling urban life, serves as an ideal backdrop for our study. It's a place where you're just as likely to come across a tractor on the street as you are a taco truck. With its inherent charm and sprinkling of cornfields, Springfield provides the perfect setting to explore the intersection of agricultural practices and atmospheric conditions.
As our investigation unfolds, we'll navigate through the corn maze of data, pitting statistics against starchy speculation to uncover whether the use of GMOs in corn production has indeed left its imprint on the city's air quality. We'll sift through the kernels of information, separating the corn from the chaff, and attempt to crack the mystery behind the potential impact of GM crops on the air we breathe.
So buckle up, grab a cob of corn, and join us as we venture into the cornfields of science and air pollution. Our findings promise to be as intriguing as a corncob gun at a county fair, and perhaps as surprising as finding a GMO-free taco stand in a sea of genetically modified corn.

[[RESULTS]]
RESULTS
The statistical analysis revealed a corn-nection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and levels of air pollution in Springfield, Missouri from 2000 to 2007. The correlation coefficient was found to be 0.7937720, indicating a strong positive relationship between the extent of GMO corn cultivation and air pollution levels in the city. In addition, the r-squared value of 0.6300740 suggests that approximately 63% of the variation in air pollution can be explained by the variation in GMO corn use. This relationship was found to be statistically significant, with a p-value of less than 0.05, providing evidence that the observed association is unlikely to have occurred by chance.
Fig. 1 depicts the scatterplot illustrating the unmistakable positive correlation between the variables. The upward trend in the data points resembles the trajectory of a popcorn kernel ascending from the depths of a hot pan, revealing a compelling narrative of the potential influence of GMO corn on the atmospheric conditions in Springfield.
These findings purport that the use of GMOs in corn production may not only be contributing to the city's agricultural landscape but also leaving its mark on the air quality, much like a wayward kernel of corn in a field of hay. The implications of this research are as striking as the realization that one has mistakenly bitten into a raw corn kernel, and they call for further exploration into the interplay between agricultural practices and urban air pollution.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study unearths a compelling connection between GMO corn cultivation and air pollution in Springfield, Missouri, akin to stumbling upon a needle in a corn stack. The statistical analysis illuminates a tight cob-nectedness, with a correlation coefficient that speaks volumes about the potential impact of GMOs on the city's atmospheric conditions. Our findings resonate as strongly as the pop of each kernel in a hot pan, underscoring the need for further investigation into the agricultural influences on urban air quality.

It is evident that the use of GMOs in corn production may not only shape the city's agricultural landscape but also leave a discernible imprint on the air we breathe, much like the subtle aroma of corn on a summer breeze. While we acknowledge the corn-plexities of this relationship, our results call for a closer examination of the interplay between agricultural practices and urban environmental dynamics. However, given the undeniable correlation uncovered in this study, it may be corn-ceded that further research in this area is as unnecessary as a second helping of corn on the cob at a barbecue.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Maizey Air: The GMO-Gas Connection in Springfield, Missouri. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

Journal of Agroecological Biophysics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Maizey Air: The GMO-Gas Connection in Springfield, Missouri. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Genetically Engineered Crop Research and Environmental Sustainability (CGECRES)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Maizey Air: The GMO-Gas Connection in Springfield, Missouri with an abstract of In this study, we investigate the potentially corny relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and levels of air pollution in Springfield, Missouri. Leveraging data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), we performed a rigorous statistical analysis to examine the correlation between GMO corn cultivation and air quality in this quintessentially Midwestern city. Our findings reveal a tight cob-nectedness, with a correlation coefficient of 0.7937720 and a p-value less than 0.05 for the years spanning from 2000 to 2007. These results suggest that, much like kernels popping in a hot pan, the use of GMOs in corn may be contributing to the atmospheric conditions in Springfield. Our study sheds light on this ear-resistible link and underscores the importance of further probing the agricultural impact on urban air pollution.

ChatGPT:

genetically modified organisms, GMO, corn production, air pollution, Springfield Missouri, United States Department of Agriculture, USDA, Environmental Protection Agency, EPA, statistical analysis, correlation, air quality, corn cultivation, correlation coefficient, p-value, atmospheric conditions, urban air pollution, agricultural impact

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in United States genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn

Air pollution in Springfield, Missouri
Detailed data title: Percentage of days 'unhealthy' or worse air quality in Springfield, MO
Source: Environmental Protection Agency
See what else correlates with Air pollution in Springfield, Missouri

Correlation r = 0.7937720 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6300740 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 63% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Air pollution in Springfield, Missouri) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn) over the 8 years from 2000 through 2007.

p < 0.05, which statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.019. 0.0186755750011380760000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.79 in 1.9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 54 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 7 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 7 because we have two variables measured over a period of 8 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.2, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20002001200220032004200520062007
GMO use in corn (GMO corn %)1124691528
Air pollution in Springfield, Missouri (Bad air quality days)00.27397300000.2739730.547945




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Very low n: There are not many data points included in this analysis. Even if the p-value is high, we should be suspicious of using so few datapoints in a correlation.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([1,1,2,4,6,9,15,28,])
array_2 = np.array([0,0.273973,0,0,0,0,0.273973,0.547945,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn"
array_2_name = "Air pollution in Springfield, Missouri"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for being the explorer we needed!


Correlation ID: 2854 · Black Variable ID: 752 · Red Variable ID: 21299
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0