about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,847 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and the second variable is Eni S.p.A.'s stock price (E).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the corn grew bigger and stronger, it started whispering stock tips to unsuspecting passersby, causing a surge in Eni S.p.A.'s stock price. Or perhaps the corn was just really good at photosynthesizing money for the company.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a sprawling cornfield in Iowa, with rows of tall, green genetically modified corn plants stretching as far as the eye can see. The corn plants contain bright yellow cobs, each bearing kernels in the unmistakable shape of dollar signs. In the background, a stock market ticker tape featuring Eni S.p.A.'s logo shows a steady climb in the stock price, reflecting the influence of the lucrative corn. The scene should be portrayed in a futuristic style, with a blend of advanced technology and agricultural elements. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Eni S.p.A.'s stock price (E). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a meme Magic realism Futuristic Minimalism Photorealism
ChatGPT: Futuristic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Eni S.p.A.'s stock price (E), in the following situation: Changes in GMO use in corn grown in Iowa caused Eni S.p.A.'s stock price to increase because the genetically modified corn produced kernels in the shape of dollar signs, subliminally influencing investors to buy more stock.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a sprawling cornfield in Iowa, rows of tall, green genetically modified corn plants stretch as far as the eye can see. Among the emerald leaves, bright yellow cobs can be seen, each bearing kernels in the unmistakable shape of dollar signs. Nearby, a stock market ticker tape featuring Eni S.p.A.'s logo shows a steady climb in the stock price, reflecting the influence of the lucrative corn.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: In a sprawling cornfield in Iowa, rows of tall, green genetically modified corn plants stretch as far as the eye can see. Among the emerald leaves, bright yellow cobs can be seen, each bearing kernels in the unmistakable shape of dollar signs. Nearby, a stock market ticker tape featuring Eni S.p.A.'s logo shows a steady climb in the stock price, reflecting the influence of the lucrative corn. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a sprawling cornfield in Iowa, with rows of tall, green genetically modified corn plants stretching as far as the eye can see. The corn plants contain bright yellow cobs, each bearing kernels in the unmistakable shape of dollar signs. In the background, a stock market ticker tape featuring Eni S.p.A.'s logo shows a steady climb in the stock price, reflecting the influence of the lucrative corn. The scene should be portrayed in a futuristic style, with a blend of advanced technology and agricultural elements.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in Iowa caused Eni S.p.A.'s stock price (E) to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Stalk-ing the Market: The Kernel Connection Between GMO Corn and Eni S.p.A.'s Stock Price

The Journal of Agronomic Finance and Market Analysis

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Eni S.p.A.'s stock price (E). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.7973432 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk-ing the Market: The Kernel Connection Between GMO Corn and Eni S.p.A.'s Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to examine the potential connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn in the cornfields of Iowa and its impact on the stock price of Eni S.p.A. We utilized data sources from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct our analysis, covering the time span from 2002 to 2023. By employing rigorous statistical methods, we identified a significantly robust correlation coefficient of 0.7973432, with p < 0.01, suggesting a strong potential relationship between GMO corn production and the stock performance of Eni S.p.A. Our findings offer a kernel of insight into the potential interplay between agronomic practices and market dynamics, shedding light on the inexorable connection between the agri-business sector and the financial world. This research contributes to the burgeoning field of agricultural economics and finance, offering a cornucopia of food for thought for investors and policymakers alike.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Eni S.p.A.'s stock price (E). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk-ing the Market: The Kernel Connection Between GMO Corn and Eni S.p.A.'s Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to examine the potential connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn in the cornfields of Iowa and its impact on the stock price of Eni S.p.A. We utilized data sources from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct our analysis, covering the time span from 2002 to 2023. By employing rigorous statistical methods, we identified a significantly robust correlation coefficient of 0.7973432, with p < 0.01, suggesting a strong potential relationship between GMO corn production and the stock performance of Eni S.p.A. Our findings offer a kernel of insight into the potential interplay between agronomic practices and market dynamics, shedding light on the inexorable connection between the agri-business sector and the financial world. This research contributes to the burgeoning field of agricultural economics and finance, offering a cornucopia of food for thought for investors and policymakers alike.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

When it comes to the intersection of agriculture and finance, the market is ripe with potential connections waiting to be unearthed. One such relationship that has garnered increasing attention in recent years is the influence of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn on the stock price of Eni S.p.A., an Italian multinational oil and gas company. It seems that the seeds of curiosity have germinated, prompting us to delve deeper into this captivating conundrum.

Given the widespread adoption of GMO technology in agricultural practices, particularly in the cornfields of Iowa, the potential spillover effects into the financial domain have become a-MAIZE-ing to ponder. As we embark on this research journey, we aim to peel back the layers of complexity surrounding this topic and cobble together a kernel of understanding regarding the nuanced relationship between GMO corn production and Eni S.p.A.'s stock performance.

Our study extends beyond mere agronomic analyses and ventures into the domain of market dynamics, where the volatility of stock prices can rival the tempestuous nature of a summer storm sweeping through the heartland. By harnessing the power of statistical methods and empirical data, we intend to sift through the husks of uncertainty to reveal the kernels of truth that lie at the crux of this correlation.

However, we must tread carefully through the corn maze of empirical research, mindful of the various confounding variables and potential stalks of bias that may sway our findings. Nevertheless, armed with robust data sources from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics, we aim to shed light on the intricate web of interactions between the agricultural sector and the ebbs and flows of financial markets.

As we venture forth into this cornucopia of interdisciplinary investigation, our findings could potentially offer a "kernal" of insight into the interplay between agronomic practices and market fervor. It is our hope that this research not only cultivates intellectual curiosity but also sows the seeds of knowledge that may ultimately benefit investors and policymakers navigating the labyrinthine landscape of agri-business and finance.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Eni S.p.A.'s stock price (E). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk-ing the Market: The Kernel Connection Between GMO Corn and Eni S.p.A.'s Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to examine the potential connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn in the cornfields of Iowa and its impact on the stock price of Eni S.p.A. We utilized data sources from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct our analysis, covering the time span from 2002 to 2023. By employing rigorous statistical methods, we identified a significantly robust correlation coefficient of 0.7973432, with p < 0.01, suggesting a strong potential relationship between GMO corn production and the stock performance of Eni S.p.A. Our findings offer a kernel of insight into the potential interplay between agronomic practices and market dynamics, shedding light on the inexorable connection between the agri-business sector and the financial world. This research contributes to the burgeoning field of agricultural economics and finance, offering a cornucopia of food for thought for investors and policymakers alike.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
When it comes to the intersection of agriculture and finance, the market is ripe with potential connections waiting to be unearthed. One such relationship that has garnered increasing attention in recent years is the influence of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn on the stock price of Eni S.p.A., an Italian multinational oil and gas company. It seems that the seeds of curiosity have germinated, prompting us to delve deeper into this captivating conundrum.
Given the widespread adoption of GMO technology in agricultural practices, particularly in the cornfields of Iowa, the potential spillover effects into the financial domain have become a-MAIZE-ing to ponder. As we embark on this research journey, we aim to peel back the layers of complexity surrounding this topic and cobble together a kernel of understanding regarding the nuanced relationship between GMO corn production and Eni S.p.A.'s stock performance.
Our study extends beyond mere agronomic analyses and ventures into the domain of market dynamics, where the volatility of stock prices can rival the tempestuous nature of a summer storm sweeping through the heartland. By harnessing the power of statistical methods and empirical data, we intend to sift through the husks of uncertainty to reveal the kernels of truth that lie at the crux of this correlation.
However, we must tread carefully through the corn maze of empirical research, mindful of the various confounding variables and potential stalks of bias that may sway our findings. Nevertheless, armed with robust data sources from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics, we aim to shed light on the intricate web of interactions between the agricultural sector and the ebbs and flows of financial markets.
As we venture forth into this cornucopia of interdisciplinary investigation, our findings could potentially offer a "kernal" of insight into the interplay between agronomic practices and market fervor. It is our hope that this research not only cultivates intellectual curiosity but also sows the seeds of knowledge that may ultimately benefit investors and policymakers navigating the labyrinthine landscape of agri-business and finance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find that the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn has significant implications for agricultural production. This insight sets the stage for our investigation into the potential link between GMO corn production in Iowa and the stock price of Eni S.p.A., a topic that has not been widely explored in the existing literature. As we navigate this unexplored terrain, it is essential to consider the broader implications of our findings and how they may germinate in the fields of agri-business and finance.

Expanding our view to incorporate diverse perspectives, "Doe et al." suggest a nuanced interconnection between agricultural practices and market dynamics, hinting at the complex interplay between supply and demand forces. Such musings prompt us to ponder the stock market's insatiable appetite for new variables, much like corn's insatiable thirst for sunlight and water. The parallels between agriculture and finance start to sound stalkingly familiar, don't they?

Transitioning to a broader perspective, "Jones et al." offer to shed light on the broader economic implications of GMO crop cultivation. Their work serves as a cornucopia of information, sparking kernels of insight into the multifaceted impact of biotechnology on various sectors, including energy, agriculture, and finance. Who knew the humble corn kernel could have such far-reaching influence?

Turning to non-fiction works, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "Food, Inc." by Peter Pringle provide a bushel of thought-provoking insights into the agricultural and food industries, offering a tantalizing glimpse into the complex world of GMOs and their ripple effects. These texts serve as a reminder that beneath the seemingly mundane exterior of a cornfield lies a veritable cornucopia of intrigue and interconnections.

From the realm of fiction, "Maze Runner" by James Dashner and "Corn Dogs" by Debra Hyde offer a whimsical take on the labyrinthine nature of our investigation, reminding us that navigating the maze of agricultural and financial dynamics is akin to traversing the twists and turns of a gripping novel. It seems that the unpredictability of markets and the wily nature of corn have more in common than meets the eye.

Bringing a touch of internet culture into the mix, the "Success Kid" meme presents a fitting analogy to our research endeavor, encapsulating the "kernal" of success we hope to unearth in our exploration of the GMO corn-Eni S.p.A. stock price relationship. Just as the determined toddler clenches his fist in victory, we too aim to emerge triumphant from the labyrinth of market data and agricultural nuances, armed with valuable insights that transcend the boundaries of disciplines.

With these diverse perspectives in mind, we set out to embark on our empirical journey, aiming to shuck the husks of uncertainty and reveal the kernels of truth that lie at the crux of the correlation between GMO corn production and Eni S.p.A.'s stock performance. As we press on, let us keep our ears to the ground, listening for the faint whispers of correlation amidst the rustling of corn stalks and the ebbs and flows of market forces.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Eni S.p.A.'s stock price (E). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk-ing the Market: The Kernel Connection Between GMO Corn and Eni S.p.A.'s Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to examine the potential connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn in the cornfields of Iowa and its impact on the stock price of Eni S.p.A. We utilized data sources from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct our analysis, covering the time span from 2002 to 2023. By employing rigorous statistical methods, we identified a significantly robust correlation coefficient of 0.7973432, with p < 0.01, suggesting a strong potential relationship between GMO corn production and the stock performance of Eni S.p.A. Our findings offer a kernel of insight into the potential interplay between agronomic practices and market dynamics, shedding light on the inexorable connection between the agri-business sector and the financial world. This research contributes to the burgeoning field of agricultural economics and finance, offering a cornucopia of food for thought for investors and policymakers alike.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
When it comes to the intersection of agriculture and finance, the market is ripe with potential connections waiting to be unearthed. One such relationship that has garnered increasing attention in recent years is the influence of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn on the stock price of Eni S.p.A., an Italian multinational oil and gas company. It seems that the seeds of curiosity have germinated, prompting us to delve deeper into this captivating conundrum.
Given the widespread adoption of GMO technology in agricultural practices, particularly in the cornfields of Iowa, the potential spillover effects into the financial domain have become a-MAIZE-ing to ponder. As we embark on this research journey, we aim to peel back the layers of complexity surrounding this topic and cobble together a kernel of understanding regarding the nuanced relationship between GMO corn production and Eni S.p.A.'s stock performance.
Our study extends beyond mere agronomic analyses and ventures into the domain of market dynamics, where the volatility of stock prices can rival the tempestuous nature of a summer storm sweeping through the heartland. By harnessing the power of statistical methods and empirical data, we intend to sift through the husks of uncertainty to reveal the kernels of truth that lie at the crux of this correlation.
However, we must tread carefully through the corn maze of empirical research, mindful of the various confounding variables and potential stalks of bias that may sway our findings. Nevertheless, armed with robust data sources from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics, we aim to shed light on the intricate web of interactions between the agricultural sector and the ebbs and flows of financial markets.
As we venture forth into this cornucopia of interdisciplinary investigation, our findings could potentially offer a "kernal" of insight into the interplay between agronomic practices and market fervor. It is our hope that this research not only cultivates intellectual curiosity but also sows the seeds of knowledge that may ultimately benefit investors and policymakers navigating the labyrinthine landscape of agri-business and finance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To reap a bountiful harvest of insights into the potential relationship between the use of GMO corn in Iowa and the stock price of Eni S.p.A., our research team employed a comprehensive and meticulously designed methodology. We gathered a bushel of data from vast digital cornfields, courtesy of reputable sources such as the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). The dataset spanned the years 2002 through 2023, ensuring a thorough examination of annual fluctuations in both GMO corn production and Eni S.p.A.'s stock performance.

Our first step involved shucking away irrelevant data and cultivating a homogenous dataset ripe for analysis. We carefully sieved through the information, discarding any kernels of data that did not meet our stringent criteria for reliability and relevance. With the removal of any metaphorical chaff, we were left with a clean and uniform dataset ready for the next stages of statistical cultivation.

Following the dataset culling, we engaged in a robust econometric modeling process to navigate the corn maze of potential correlations between GMO corn production and Eni S.p.A.'s stock price. We applied a novel approach inspired by the growth patterns of cornstalks – a growth curve modeling technique that allowed us to capture the trajectory of both agricultural and market variables over time.

To guard against the potential tassels of spurious correlation, we implemented advanced time-series analysis methods akin to fortifying a silo against the unpredictable whims of the weather. This included autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models to capture the interplay of past stock prices and lagged GMO corn production, akin to the intricate dance between planting and harvest seasons.

A key aspect of our methodology involved addressing the potential endogeneity between GMO corn production and Eni S.p.A.'s stock price. Just as a well-designed irrigation system ensures the even growth of crops, we utilized instrumental variable estimation techniques to mitigate any potential bidirectional causality, thus inoculating our findings against the pernicious weeds of spurious relationships.

Furthermore, we employed a variety of robustness checks akin to surveying a field for signs of pest infestation, ensuring the validity and credibility of our findings. Sensitivity analyses and Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to examine the resilience of our results against varying assumptions, akin to weathering the impact of unpredictable climate phenomena.

In collaborating with our statistical experts and agricultural finance aficionados, we sought to weed out any lurking biases and confounding factors that could muddle the clarity of our findings. Through a process of rigorous peer review and analytical cross-pollination, we cultivated a research methodology designed to yield a bumper crop of empirical insights into the potential connection between GMO corn production and Eni S.p.A.'s stock performance.

With this meticulously curated methodological approach, we endeavor to not only enrich the academic discourse but also harvest a bounty of practical implications for stakeholders navigating the ever-green landscape of agri-business and finance. With our work primed for statistical harvest, we are eager to offer a bushel of findings that may sow the seeds of informed decision-making in the agricultural and financial spheres.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Eni S.p.A.'s stock price (E). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.7973432, r-squared of 0.6357561, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk-ing the Market: The Kernel Connection Between GMO Corn and Eni S.p.A.'s Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to examine the potential connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn in the cornfields of Iowa and its impact on the stock price of Eni S.p.A. We utilized data sources from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct our analysis, covering the time span from 2002 to 2023. By employing rigorous statistical methods, we identified a significantly robust correlation coefficient of 0.7973432, with p < 0.01, suggesting a strong potential relationship between GMO corn production and the stock performance of Eni S.p.A. Our findings offer a kernel of insight into the potential interplay between agronomic practices and market dynamics, shedding light on the inexorable connection between the agri-business sector and the financial world. This research contributes to the burgeoning field of agricultural economics and finance, offering a cornucopia of food for thought for investors and policymakers alike.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
When it comes to the intersection of agriculture and finance, the market is ripe with potential connections waiting to be unearthed. One such relationship that has garnered increasing attention in recent years is the influence of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn on the stock price of Eni S.p.A., an Italian multinational oil and gas company. It seems that the seeds of curiosity have germinated, prompting us to delve deeper into this captivating conundrum.
Given the widespread adoption of GMO technology in agricultural practices, particularly in the cornfields of Iowa, the potential spillover effects into the financial domain have become a-MAIZE-ing to ponder. As we embark on this research journey, we aim to peel back the layers of complexity surrounding this topic and cobble together a kernel of understanding regarding the nuanced relationship between GMO corn production and Eni S.p.A.'s stock performance.
Our study extends beyond mere agronomic analyses and ventures into the domain of market dynamics, where the volatility of stock prices can rival the tempestuous nature of a summer storm sweeping through the heartland. By harnessing the power of statistical methods and empirical data, we intend to sift through the husks of uncertainty to reveal the kernels of truth that lie at the crux of this correlation.
However, we must tread carefully through the corn maze of empirical research, mindful of the various confounding variables and potential stalks of bias that may sway our findings. Nevertheless, armed with robust data sources from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics, we aim to shed light on the intricate web of interactions between the agricultural sector and the ebbs and flows of financial markets.
As we venture forth into this cornucopia of interdisciplinary investigation, our findings could potentially offer a "kernal" of insight into the interplay between agronomic practices and market fervor. It is our hope that this research not only cultivates intellectual curiosity but also sows the seeds of knowledge that may ultimately benefit investors and policymakers navigating the labyrinthine landscape of agri-business and finance.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our research revealed a notably robust correlation between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn in Iowa and the stock price of Eni S.p.A. From 2002 to 2023, our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7973432, an r-squared of 0.6357561, and a p-value less than 0.01, implying a statistically significant relationship.

Fig. 1 illustrates this corn-nection, depicting a scatterplot demonstrating the strong positive association between GMO corn production and Eni S.p.A.'s stock price. It's quite a-maize-ing to witness how these two seemingly unrelated entities are kernel-ly linked in their fluctuations.

In statistical terms, this correlation coefficient indicates a strong linear relationship between the two variables. This finding suggests that the impact of GMO corn production in Iowa truly stalks the movement of Eni S.p.A.'s stock price. It seems that when it comes to market dynamics, the growth of GMO corn crops in Iowa is truly ear-resistible to investors pondering their stock portfolio.

Our findings provide fertile ground for discussion and further research into the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and financial markets. This research not only peels back the layers of statistical nuance but also cobbles together a kernel of understanding regarding the impact of GMO corn on stock price performance.

Overall, our results highlight the striking correlation between the growth of GMO corn and the fluctuations in Eni S.p.A.'s stock price, offering food for thought for investors and policymakers alike. These findings may ultimately serve as a compass for navigating the labyrinthine landscape of agri-business and finance, providing a seed of knowledge for those seeking to cultivate their understanding of these interconnected domains.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Eni S.p.A.'s stock price (E). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Stalk-ing the Market: The Kernel Connection Between GMO Corn and Eni S.p.A.'s Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to examine the potential connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn in the cornfields of Iowa and its impact on the stock price of Eni S.p.A. We utilized data sources from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct our analysis, covering the time span from 2002 to 2023. By employing rigorous statistical methods, we identified a significantly robust correlation coefficient of 0.7973432, with p < 0.01, suggesting a strong potential relationship between GMO corn production and the stock performance of Eni S.p.A. Our findings offer a kernel of insight into the potential interplay between agronomic practices and market dynamics, shedding light on the inexorable connection between the agri-business sector and the financial world. This research contributes to the burgeoning field of agricultural economics and finance, offering a cornucopia of food for thought for investors and policymakers alike.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn has significant implications for agricultural production. This insight sets the stage for our investigation into the potential link between GMO corn production in Iowa and the stock price of Eni S.p.A., a topic that has not been widely explored in the existing literature. As we navigate this unexplored terrain, it is essential to consider the broader implications of our findings and how they may germinate in the fields of agri-business and finance.
Expanding our view to incorporate diverse perspectives, "Doe et al." suggest a nuanced interconnection between agricultural practices and market dynamics, hinting at the complex interplay between supply and demand forces. Such musings prompt us to ponder the stock market's insatiable appetite for new variables, much like corn's insatiable thirst for sunlight and water. The parallels between agriculture and finance start to sound stalkingly familiar, don't they?
Transitioning to a broader perspective, "Jones et al." offer to shed light on the broader economic implications of GMO crop cultivation. Their work serves as a cornucopia of information, sparking kernels of insight into the multifaceted impact of biotechnology on various sectors, including energy, agriculture, and finance. Who knew the humble corn kernel could have such far-reaching influence?
Turning to non-fiction works, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "Food, Inc." by Peter Pringle provide a bushel of thought-provoking insights into the agricultural and food industries, offering a tantalizing glimpse into the complex world of GMOs and their ripple effects. These texts serve as a reminder that beneath the seemingly mundane exterior of a cornfield lies a veritable cornucopia of intrigue and interconnections.
From the realm of fiction, "Maze Runner" by James Dashner and "Corn Dogs" by Debra Hyde offer a whimsical take on the labyrinthine nature of our investigation, reminding us that navigating the maze of agricultural and financial dynamics is akin to traversing the twists and turns of a gripping novel. It seems that the unpredictability of markets and the wily nature of corn have more in common than meets the eye.
Bringing a touch of internet culture into the mix, the "Success Kid" meme presents a fitting analogy to our research endeavor, encapsulating the "kernal" of success we hope to unearth in our exploration of the GMO corn-Eni S.p.A. stock price relationship. Just as the determined toddler clenches his fist in victory, we too aim to emerge triumphant from the labyrinth of market data and agricultural nuances, armed with valuable insights that transcend the boundaries of disciplines.
With these diverse perspectives in mind, we set out to embark on our empirical journey, aiming to shuck the husks of uncertainty and reveal the kernels of truth that lie at the crux of the correlation between GMO corn production and Eni S.p.A.'s stock performance. As we press on, let us keep our ears to the ground, listening for the faint whispers of correlation amidst the rustling of corn stalks and the ebbs and flows of market forces.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our research revealed a notably robust correlation between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn in Iowa and the stock price of Eni S.p.A. From 2002 to 2023, our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7973432, an r-squared of 0.6357561, and a p-value less than 0.01, implying a statistically significant relationship.
Fig. 1 illustrates this corn-nection, depicting a scatterplot demonstrating the strong positive association between GMO corn production and Eni S.p.A.'s stock price. It's quite a-maize-ing to witness how these two seemingly unrelated entities are kernel-ly linked in their fluctuations.
In statistical terms, this correlation coefficient indicates a strong linear relationship between the two variables. This finding suggests that the impact of GMO corn production in Iowa truly stalks the movement of Eni S.p.A.'s stock price. It seems that when it comes to market dynamics, the growth of GMO corn crops in Iowa is truly ear-resistible to investors pondering their stock portfolio.
Our findings provide fertile ground for discussion and further research into the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and financial markets. This research not only peels back the layers of statistical nuance but also cobbles together a kernel of understanding regarding the impact of GMO corn on stock price performance.
Overall, our results highlight the striking correlation between the growth of GMO corn and the fluctuations in Eni S.p.A.'s stock price, offering food for thought for investors and policymakers alike. These findings may ultimately serve as a compass for navigating the labyrinthine landscape of agri-business and finance, providing a seed of knowledge for those seeking to cultivate their understanding of these interconnected domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study sheds light on the potential connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Iowa and the stock price of Eni S.p.A. Our analysis supports the previous research by "Smith et al.," who highlighted the significant implications of GMOs on agricultural production. It seems that the growth of GMO corn indeed kernels the movement of Eni S.p.A.'s stock price, in a relationship as tightly bound as the cob to the kernels.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.7973432, with a p-value less than 0.01, provides compelling evidence of a strong linear relationship between the two variables. This finding suggests that the impact of GMO corn production in Iowa truly stalks the movement of Eni S.p.A.'s stock price. It appears that the stock market is as attracted to GMO corn as a moth to a flame, or perhaps in this case, a corn borer to a stalk. It's truly a-maize-ing how these seemingly divergent entities are inextricably kernel-ly linked in their fluctuations, cornfounding as it may seem.

The parallels between agriculture and finance have ripened into fortuitous findings, offering investors a bounty of food for thought. Just as the cornfield requires meticulous tending and monitoring, so too does the investment portfolio demand careful attention to the growth of GMO corn and its piquant effect on stock performance.

Our research serves as a reminder that beneath the seemingly mundane exterior of a cornfield lies a veritable cornucopia of intrigue and interconnections. The intricate web of relationships between GMO corn production and stock price movements presents a maze of data to navigate, reminiscent of the twists and turns of a gripping novel. It's akin to trying to solve a perplexing corn maze without a map – a task as challenging as predicting market fluctuations in the absence of pertinent information.

And just as the determined toddler clenches his fist in victory, we too aim to emerge triumphant from the labyrinth of market data and agricultural nuances, armed with valuable insights that transcend the boundaries of disciplines. The core finding of our study suggests that the kernel of GMO corn production has a significant impact on the stock performance of Eni S.p.A., providing a fertile ground for future empirical and theoretical investigations.

In summary, our research has harvested a compelling correlation between the growth of GMO corn in Iowa and the fluctuations in Eni S.p.A.'s stock price. This finding not only peels back the layers of statistical nuance but also cobbles together a kernel of understanding regarding the impact of GMO corn on stock price performance. It seems that when it comes to market dynamics, the growth of GMO corn crops in Iowa is truly ear-resistible to investors pondering their stock portfolio. Our findings may ultimately serve as a compass for navigating the labyrinthine landscape of agri-business and finance, providing a seed of knowledge for those seeking to cultivate their understanding of these interconnected domains.

In conclusion, the conflation of GMO corn production and stock price movements is not merely a corny coincidence, but rather a matter worthy of further exploration and investment.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Iowa and Eni S.p.A.'s stock price (E). Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk-ing the Market: The Kernel Connection Between GMO Corn and Eni S.p.A.'s Stock Price"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to examine the potential connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn in the cornfields of Iowa and its impact on the stock price of Eni S.p.A. We utilized data sources from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct our analysis, covering the time span from 2002 to 2023. By employing rigorous statistical methods, we identified a significantly robust correlation coefficient of 0.7973432, with p < 0.01, suggesting a strong potential relationship between GMO corn production and the stock performance of Eni S.p.A. Our findings offer a kernel of insight into the potential interplay between agronomic practices and market dynamics, shedding light on the inexorable connection between the agri-business sector and the financial world. This research contributes to the burgeoning field of agricultural economics and finance, offering a cornucopia of food for thought for investors and policymakers alike.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
When it comes to the intersection of agriculture and finance, the market is ripe with potential connections waiting to be unearthed. One such relationship that has garnered increasing attention in recent years is the influence of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn on the stock price of Eni S.p.A., an Italian multinational oil and gas company. It seems that the seeds of curiosity have germinated, prompting us to delve deeper into this captivating conundrum.
Given the widespread adoption of GMO technology in agricultural practices, particularly in the cornfields of Iowa, the potential spillover effects into the financial domain have become a-MAIZE-ing to ponder. As we embark on this research journey, we aim to peel back the layers of complexity surrounding this topic and cobble together a kernel of understanding regarding the nuanced relationship between GMO corn production and Eni S.p.A.'s stock performance.
Our study extends beyond mere agronomic analyses and ventures into the domain of market dynamics, where the volatility of stock prices can rival the tempestuous nature of a summer storm sweeping through the heartland. By harnessing the power of statistical methods and empirical data, we intend to sift through the husks of uncertainty to reveal the kernels of truth that lie at the crux of this correlation.
However, we must tread carefully through the corn maze of empirical research, mindful of the various confounding variables and potential stalks of bias that may sway our findings. Nevertheless, armed with robust data sources from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics, we aim to shed light on the intricate web of interactions between the agricultural sector and the ebbs and flows of financial markets.
As we venture forth into this cornucopia of interdisciplinary investigation, our findings could potentially offer a "kernal" of insight into the interplay between agronomic practices and market fervor. It is our hope that this research not only cultivates intellectual curiosity but also sows the seeds of knowledge that may ultimately benefit investors and policymakers navigating the labyrinthine landscape of agri-business and finance.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our research revealed a notably robust correlation between the utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn in Iowa and the stock price of Eni S.p.A. From 2002 to 2023, our analysis uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.7973432, an r-squared of 0.6357561, and a p-value less than 0.01, implying a statistically significant relationship.
Fig. 1 illustrates this corn-nection, depicting a scatterplot demonstrating the strong positive association between GMO corn production and Eni S.p.A.'s stock price. It's quite a-maize-ing to witness how these two seemingly unrelated entities are kernel-ly linked in their fluctuations.
In statistical terms, this correlation coefficient indicates a strong linear relationship between the two variables. This finding suggests that the impact of GMO corn production in Iowa truly stalks the movement of Eni S.p.A.'s stock price. It seems that when it comes to market dynamics, the growth of GMO corn crops in Iowa is truly ear-resistible to investors pondering their stock portfolio.
Our findings provide fertile ground for discussion and further research into the intricate interplay between agricultural practices and financial markets. This research not only peels back the layers of statistical nuance but also cobbles together a kernel of understanding regarding the impact of GMO corn on stock price performance.
Overall, our results highlight the striking correlation between the growth of GMO corn and the fluctuations in Eni S.p.A.'s stock price, offering food for thought for investors and policymakers alike. These findings may ultimately serve as a compass for navigating the labyrinthine landscape of agri-business and finance, providing a seed of knowledge for those seeking to cultivate their understanding of these interconnected domains.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unearthed a stalk-ing correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Iowa's cornfields and Eni S.p.A.'s stock price. The statistically robust correlation coefficient of 0.7973432 pricks the curiosity, suggesting a maize-ing connection that cannot be simply brushed aside. Our findings, rooted in rigorous statistical analysis, illustrate how the growth of GMO corn in Iowa ear-resistibly influences the market dynamics of Eni S.p.A.'s stock price.

It's clear that this unlikely kernel connection between GMO corn and stock price volatility offers a corn-ucopia of implications for investors and policymakers. The strong correlation observed in our analysis demonstrates the potential for GMO corn production to cobble together a significant impact on the financial markets, a notion that should not be husked aside.

Furthermore, our research sprouts new insights into the intricate web of interactions between agricultural practices and market fervor. As we navigate this enigmatic labyrinth of correlation, we have sown the seeds of knowledge that may ultimately benefit those seeking to cultivate their understanding of these interconnected domains, much like a diligent farmer tending to his crop.

In light of our findings, we confidently assert that no further research is needed in this field. The cob has been cracked open, and the seeds of correlation have been sown. It is time to reap the harvest of knowledge and move on to more a-peeling research avenues.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Stalk-ing the Market: The Kernel Connection Between GMO Corn and Eni S.p.A.'s Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agronomic Finance and Market Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Stalk-ing the Market: The Kernel Connection Between GMO Corn and Eni S.p.A.'s Stock Price. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Agricultural and Financial Research (IAFR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Stalk-ing the Market: The Kernel Connection Between GMO Corn and Eni S.p.A.'s Stock Price with an abstract of This paper aims to examine the potential connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in the cultivation of corn in the cornfields of Iowa and its impact on the stock price of Eni S.p.A. We utilized data sources from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to conduct our analysis, covering the time span from 2002 to 2023. By employing rigorous statistical methods, we identified a significantly robust correlation coefficient of 0.7973432, with p < 0.01, suggesting a strong potential relationship between GMO corn production and the stock performance of Eni S.p.A. Our findings offer a kernel of insight into the potential interplay between agronomic practices and market dynamics, shedding light on the inexorable connection between the agri-business sector and the financial world. This research contributes to the burgeoning field of agricultural economics and finance, offering a cornucopia of food for thought for investors and policymakers alike.

ChatGPT:

GMO corn, Eni S.p.A. stock price, corn cultivation, Iowa, USDA data, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, statistical methods, correlation coefficient, agronomic practices, market dynamics, agri-business sector, financial world, agricultural economics, finance, investors, policymakers

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Iowa
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Iowa that is genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Iowa

Eni S.p.A.'s stock price (E)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Eni S.p.A. (E) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Eni S.p.A.'s stock price (E)

Correlation r = 0.7973432 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6357561 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 63.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Eni S.p.A.'s stock price (E)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Iowa) over the 22 years from 2002 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.9E-6. 0.0000088627118509671350000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.8 in 0.00089% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 112,832 random variables You don't actually need 112 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 21 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 21 because we have two variables measured over a period of 22 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.57, 0.91 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
GMO use in corn grown in Iowa (GMO corn %)781014141915151416151488987789811
Eni S.p.A.'s stock price (E) (Stock price)25.3232.4938.5649.657.1467.6673.2247.5551.9243.8642.7250.0247.723529.3932.8133.1930.9231.2621.128.0629.12




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7,8,10,14,14,19,15,15,14,16,15,14,8,8,9,8,7,7,8,9,8,11,])
array_2 = np.array([25.32,32.49,38.56,49.6,57.14,67.66,73.22,47.55,51.92,43.86,42.72,50.02,47.72,35,29.39,32.81,33.19,30.92,31.26,21.1,28.06,29.12,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Iowa"
array_2_name = "Eni S.p.A.'s stock price (E)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 2847 · Black Variable ID: 727 · Red Variable ID: 1721
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0