about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,846 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and the second variable is Pirate attacks globally.  The chart goes from 2009 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Because without GMOs, corn grows smaller and less robust, leading to a decrease in popcorn production worldwide. With less popcorn available, pirates have less to snack on during long voyages, leading to a decrease in pirate attacks globally.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate a visual of a vast Indiana cornfield under a bright sun, with genetically modified corn stalks swaying in the breeze. The corn is large and healthy, bearing robust ears bursting with golden kernels. In the foreground, a group of pirates are depicted on a swaying ship, looking longingly at a dwindling supply of popcorn. The pirates appear restless, with their map of potential targets nearby and untouched. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Pirate attacks globally. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a meme Steampunk Cute 2D animation Brutalism Magic realism
ChatGPT: Brutalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Pirate attacks globally, in the following situation: Because without GMOs, corn grows smaller and less robust, leading to a decrease in popcorn production worldwide. With less popcorn available, pirates have less to snack on during long voyages, leading to a decrease in pirate attacks globally.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast Indiana cornfield, tall stalks of genetically modified corn sway in the breeze under the bright sun. The corn is large and healthy, with robust ears bursting with golden kernels. Nearby, a group of pirates on a swaying ship look longingly at a dwindling supply of popcorn. With snack options running low, the pirates grow restless, their map of potential targets remaining untouched.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Brutalism ] and depicting this scene: In a vast Indiana cornfield, tall stalks of genetically modified corn sway in the breeze under the bright sun. The corn is large and healthy, with robust ears bursting with golden kernels. Nearby, a group of pirates on a swaying ship look longingly at a dwindling supply of popcorn. With snack options running low, the pirates grow restless, their map of potential targets remaining untouched. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate a visual of a vast Indiana cornfield under a bright sun, with genetically modified corn stalks swaying in the breeze. The corn is large and healthy, bearing robust ears bursting with golden kernels. In the foreground, a group of pirates are depicted on a swaying ship, looking longingly at a dwindling supply of popcorn. The pirates appear restless, with their map of potential targets nearby and untouched.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide humerus responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else. Your responses should be able to be used as the title for a funny post, or the top comment on a thread explaining the connection.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in corn grown in Indiana caused Pirate attacks globally to decrease. Make it hilarious and short: 3-4 sentences. Do not start with 'well' or 'you see' or similar statements. Do not restate the variables; lead with the answer (what comes after 'because...')

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Unraveling the Kernel of Truth: Investigating the Correlation Between GMO Corn Production in Indiana and Global Pirate Attacks

The Journal of Agricultural Anomalies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Pirate attacks globally. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from USDA and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9323975 and p < 0.01 for 2009 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Unraveling the Kernel of Truth: Investigating the Correlation Between GMO Corn Production in Indiana and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ahoy, mateys! This paper sets sail to investigate the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Indiana and the occurrence of pirate attacks on the high seas. We embrace the challenge of explaining how these seemingly disparate elements could be connected, or "corn-nected," if you will. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, we reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9323975 and p < 0.01 during the period from 2009 to 2022. It seems that the Buccaneers and Biogenetics share more in common than meets the "aye." This research promises to shuck the public's expectations and cob-vince skeptics of the value in investigating such obscure associations. Even though the biotech industry may have grown alongside global piracy, we can assure you that these findings are far from mere "corn-spiracy theories"!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Pirate attacks globally. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unraveling the Kernel of Truth: Investigating the Correlation Between GMO Corn Production in Indiana and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ahoy, mateys! This paper sets sail to investigate the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Indiana and the occurrence of pirate attacks on the high seas. We embrace the challenge of explaining how these seemingly disparate elements could be connected, or "corn-nected," if you will. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, we reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9323975 and p < 0.01 during the period from 2009 to 2022. It seems that the Buccaneers and Biogenetics share more in common than meets the "aye." This research promises to shuck the public's expectations and cob-vince skeptics of the value in investigating such obscure associations. Even though the biotech industry may have grown alongside global piracy, we can assure you that these findings are far from mere "corn-spiracy theories"!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Avast, ye landlubbers and scholars alike! We are about to embark on a curious scientific journey that delves into the unexpected relationship between GMO corn production in the heartland of Indiana and the swashbuckling exploits of pirates across the globe. While some may see this as an unlikely pairing, we must remind ourselves that in science, as in life, truth can be stranger than fiction – or should we say, "arr than fiction"? It's quite the conundrum, isn't it? How could the cultivation of genetically modified corn in the fields of Indiana possibly be connected to the daring escapades of pirates on the high seas? But fear not, for we are armed not with cutlasses, but with data, statistics, and a hearty sense of humor.

The notion of drawing a link between such disparate phenomena may seem as unlikely as walking the plank, but as researchers, we are eager to sail uncharted waters and explore the unlikeliest of connections. As the old saying goes, "What do you get when you cross a pirate with a statistician? Aarrrrithmetic!" You'll find that our approach to uncovering this corn-y mystery is as serious as it is whimsical – after all, scientific inquiry should be a-maize-ing, shouldn't it?

The synergy between genetically modified organisms and pirate attacks may appear as elusive as buried treasure, but rest assured, there's no funny business here – well, except for the occasional ill-timed pun. Nevertheless, we aim to conduct a rigorous analysis that adheres to the principles of sound statistical research. As we set sail on this unorthodox scientific voyage, we invite you to join us in unraveling the kernel of truth behind this unconventional correlation – or should we say, "corn-elation"? Oh, the puns are a-plentiful, but so are the scientific insights we aim to glean from this investigation.

We believe that this research represents an opportunity to challenge preconceived notions and break free from the shackles of conventional thinking. As the saying goes, "Why don't pirates shower before they walk the plank? Because they'll just wash up on the shore later." Jokes aside, we assure you that our rigorous methodology and commitment to academic excellence will guide us through the choppy seas of academic inquiry and emerge with findings that are as robust as they are riveting. So, batten down the hatches and prepare for an academic odyssey like no other – one that promises to entertain, enlighten, and perhaps even "corn-fuse" a few along the way. Onward, toward new horizons of knowledge – just watch out for the occasional pirate pun along the way!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Pirate attacks globally. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then devolve ever further, and mention something completely ridiculous, like you conducted literature review by reading CVS receipts.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unraveling the Kernel of Truth: Investigating the Correlation Between GMO Corn Production in Indiana and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ahoy, mateys! This paper sets sail to investigate the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Indiana and the occurrence of pirate attacks on the high seas. We embrace the challenge of explaining how these seemingly disparate elements could be connected, or "corn-nected," if you will. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, we reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9323975 and p < 0.01 during the period from 2009 to 2022. It seems that the Buccaneers and Biogenetics share more in common than meets the "aye." This research promises to shuck the public's expectations and cob-vince skeptics of the value in investigating such obscure associations. Even though the biotech industry may have grown alongside global piracy, we can assure you that these findings are far from mere "corn-spiracy theories"!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Avast, ye landlubbers and scholars alike! We are about to embark on a curious scientific journey that delves into the unexpected relationship between GMO corn production in the heartland of Indiana and the swashbuckling exploits of pirates across the globe. While some may see this as an unlikely pairing, we must remind ourselves that in science, as in life, truth can be stranger than fiction – or should we say, "arr than fiction"? It's quite the conundrum, isn't it? How could the cultivation of genetically modified corn in the fields of Indiana possibly be connected to the daring escapades of pirates on the high seas? But fear not, for we are armed not with cutlasses, but with data, statistics, and a hearty sense of humor.
The notion of drawing a link between such disparate phenomena may seem as unlikely as walking the plank, but as researchers, we are eager to sail uncharted waters and explore the unlikeliest of connections. As the old saying goes, "What do you get when you cross a pirate with a statistician? Aarrrrithmetic!" You'll find that our approach to uncovering this corn-y mystery is as serious as it is whimsical – after all, scientific inquiry should be a-maize-ing, shouldn't it?
The synergy between genetically modified organisms and pirate attacks may appear as elusive as buried treasure, but rest assured, there's no funny business here – well, except for the occasional ill-timed pun. Nevertheless, we aim to conduct a rigorous analysis that adheres to the principles of sound statistical research. As we set sail on this unorthodox scientific voyage, we invite you to join us in unraveling the kernel of truth behind this unconventional correlation – or should we say, "corn-elation"? Oh, the puns are a-plentiful, but so are the scientific insights we aim to glean from this investigation.
We believe that this research represents an opportunity to challenge preconceived notions and break free from the shackles of conventional thinking. As the saying goes, "Why don't pirates shower before they walk the plank? Because they'll just wash up on the shore later." Jokes aside, we assure you that our rigorous methodology and commitment to academic excellence will guide us through the choppy seas of academic inquiry and emerge with findings that are as robust as they are riveting. So, batten down the hatches and prepare for an academic odyssey like no other – one that promises to entertain, enlighten, and perhaps even "corn-fuse" a few along the way. Onward, toward new horizons of knowledge – just watch out for the occasional pirate pun along the way!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Agricultural Biotechnology and the Global Food Supply" by Smith, the authors find that the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has been a contentious issue, with concerns ranging from environmental impact to human health implications. However, amidst these debates, the widespread use of GMOs in corn cultivation has steadily increased, particularly in regions such as the state of Indiana. The application of biotechnology in agriculture has undeniably altered the landscape of crop production, offering potential benefits such as increased yield and pest resistance. Yet, as we delve into the connection between GMO corn production in Indiana and global pirate attacks, we must navigate through uncharted scholarly waters, hoping to uncover a bounty of insights that stretch far beyond the proverbial "sea" of expectations.

In "The Economics of Global Maritime Piracy" by Doe, the focus is on the economic impact of piracy on maritime trade and shipping routes. The authors detail the significant disruptions caused by pirate attacks, affecting not only the shipping industry but also international commerce. This analysis sheds light on the tangible consequences of piracy, presenting a compelling case for studying the factors that may influence the frequency and distribution of such maritime incidents. As we venture into our investigation, we are reminded that pirates may be known for their loot, but it's the correlation coefficients and p-values that truly hold the key to unlocking this enigmatic connection.

Moving beyond scholarly works to explore relevant non-fiction publications, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan offers a comprehensive examination of modern agricultural practices and their implications for the food supply chain. While Pollan's focus may not explicitly extend to maritime activities, his exploration of corn as a ubiquitous ingredient in a myriad of products serves as a reminder of the pervasiveness of this crop and its ties to various aspects of global trade and commerce. It's almost as if corn is the silent first mate on a seafaring vessel, quietly influencing the course of events from fields to far-off shores.

On the fictional front, the swashbuckling tales of the "Pirates of the Caribbean" series by Tim Powers beckon readers to embark on high-seas adventures filled with intrigue and clandestine maneuvers. While these literary works may not offer empirical data, they certainly contribute to the cultural fascination with piracy, reminding us that the allure of the open sea and the mystique of pirates continue to capture the imagination of audiences worldwide. As we navigate through the literary seas, we can't help but wonder if there's a buried statistical treasure waiting to be unearthed amidst the narratives of scalawags and scallywags.

Diverging from traditional sources, a thorough investigation of the possibly esoteric relationship between GMO corn production in Indiana and global pirate attacks also led to a rather unorthodox source – a peculiar correlation observed while scrutinizing grocery receipts from a local market. While the findings from this unconventional data collection method may raise eyebrows, they also offer a whimsical reminder that the quest for knowledge often leads researchers to unexpected territories, much like a ship caught in a whimsical whirlpool of data and dad jokes.

As we traverse the diverse seas of literature and lore, we not only encounter academic treatises and economic analyses but also venture into the realms of fiction and the unexpected. With a healthy dose of humor and an unwavering commitment to scholarly inquiry, we set our compass toward a clearer understanding of the "corn-nection" between GMO corn production in Indiana and global pirate attacks, fully prepared to weather the occasional storm of statistical silliness and the swells of scholarly whimsy. Onward, we march – or should we say, sail?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Pirate attacks globally. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista . You used data from 2009 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unraveling the Kernel of Truth: Investigating the Correlation Between GMO Corn Production in Indiana and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ahoy, mateys! This paper sets sail to investigate the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Indiana and the occurrence of pirate attacks on the high seas. We embrace the challenge of explaining how these seemingly disparate elements could be connected, or "corn-nected," if you will. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, we reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9323975 and p < 0.01 during the period from 2009 to 2022. It seems that the Buccaneers and Biogenetics share more in common than meets the "aye." This research promises to shuck the public's expectations and cob-vince skeptics of the value in investigating such obscure associations. Even though the biotech industry may have grown alongside global piracy, we can assure you that these findings are far from mere "corn-spiracy theories"!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Avast, ye landlubbers and scholars alike! We are about to embark on a curious scientific journey that delves into the unexpected relationship between GMO corn production in the heartland of Indiana and the swashbuckling exploits of pirates across the globe. While some may see this as an unlikely pairing, we must remind ourselves that in science, as in life, truth can be stranger than fiction – or should we say, "arr than fiction"? It's quite the conundrum, isn't it? How could the cultivation of genetically modified corn in the fields of Indiana possibly be connected to the daring escapades of pirates on the high seas? But fear not, for we are armed not with cutlasses, but with data, statistics, and a hearty sense of humor.
The notion of drawing a link between such disparate phenomena may seem as unlikely as walking the plank, but as researchers, we are eager to sail uncharted waters and explore the unlikeliest of connections. As the old saying goes, "What do you get when you cross a pirate with a statistician? Aarrrrithmetic!" You'll find that our approach to uncovering this corn-y mystery is as serious as it is whimsical – after all, scientific inquiry should be a-maize-ing, shouldn't it?
The synergy between genetically modified organisms and pirate attacks may appear as elusive as buried treasure, but rest assured, there's no funny business here – well, except for the occasional ill-timed pun. Nevertheless, we aim to conduct a rigorous analysis that adheres to the principles of sound statistical research. As we set sail on this unorthodox scientific voyage, we invite you to join us in unraveling the kernel of truth behind this unconventional correlation – or should we say, "corn-elation"? Oh, the puns are a-plentiful, but so are the scientific insights we aim to glean from this investigation.
We believe that this research represents an opportunity to challenge preconceived notions and break free from the shackles of conventional thinking. As the saying goes, "Why don't pirates shower before they walk the plank? Because they'll just wash up on the shore later." Jokes aside, we assure you that our rigorous methodology and commitment to academic excellence will guide us through the choppy seas of academic inquiry and emerge with findings that are as robust as they are riveting. So, batten down the hatches and prepare for an academic odyssey like no other – one that promises to entertain, enlighten, and perhaps even "corn-fuse" a few along the way. Onward, toward new horizons of knowledge – just watch out for the occasional pirate pun along the way!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To dig deep into the corn-y connection between GMO corn production in Indiana and global pirate attacks, our research team adopted a mixed-methods approach that blended quantitative and qualitative analysis. We navigated through an extensive dataset, utilizing data sources such as the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Statista, and some treasure maps borrowed from the archives of the Pirate Museum of the Caribbean – just kidding, we wish we had access to such thrilling artifacts to enhance our investigation!

Our quantitative analysis began with a comprehensive exploration of GMO corn production in Indiana from 2009 to 2022, utilizing data from the USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service. We also plundered – uh, acquired data on global pirate attacks during the same period, aiming to map the spatial and temporal distribution of these maritime misadventures. To ensure the robustness of our findings, we employed a series of statistical tests that were as reliable as a trusty first mate. Testing for correlation, we examined the association between the prevalence of GMO corn in Indiana and the frequency of pirate attacks across international waters. The statistical significance of these associations was evaluated using a two-tailed test, and we made use of a p-value that was lower than the odds of finding buried treasure in your neighbor's backyard – that's a p < 0.01 for those of you keeping score at home!

Our qualitative analysis delved into the historical, economic, and environmental contexts surrounding both GMO corn production and pirate activity. We drew upon historical records, maritime archives, and firsthand accounts from seasoned sailors to glean insights into the societal, economic, and possibly even cultural factors that might underpin any hidden relationship – much like the treasures stowed away in a pirate's chest. We incorporated these qualitative narratives into our interpretation of the quantitative findings, creating a narrative that unfolded like the plot of a gripping swashbuckling adventure – but with far more statistical references and fewer eye patches.

In addition to our primary analysis, we conducted a rigorous sensitivity analysis to ensure that our findings were as sturdy as a seaworthy vessel navigating storm-tossed waves. This involved testing the robustness of our results to different time periods, alternate sampling techniques, and various methodological assumptions. We subjected our data to scrutiny that was stricter than a pirate captain inspecting a potential recruit for the crew, aiming to confirm that our findings were not merely fleeting mirages amid the statistical sands but were anchored in solid empirical evidence – and a few terrible pirate puns for good measure.

Throughout this process, we maintained a steadfast commitment to transparent and reproducible research practices, ensuring that our methodology and analytical processes were as clear as a cloudless sky on the open seas. Our approach combined the precision of a seasoned navigator with the meticulousness of a scholar in pursuit of truth, no matter how subtly "corn-y" it might appear. With this methodology as our compass, we set sail on a scientific voyage that aimed to steer clear of the treacherous waters of speculation and navigate toward the shores of empirical certainty – or as close to certainty as one can attain in the mercurial sea of research. Aye, the methodology be so solid, it'd even make a pirate blush – well, unless he's just sunburned from a long day of pillaging.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Pirate attacks globally. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista .

For the time period 2009 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9323975, r-squared of 0.8693650, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Unraveling the Kernel of Truth: Investigating the Correlation Between GMO Corn Production in Indiana and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ahoy, mateys! This paper sets sail to investigate the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Indiana and the occurrence of pirate attacks on the high seas. We embrace the challenge of explaining how these seemingly disparate elements could be connected, or "corn-nected," if you will. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, we reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9323975 and p < 0.01 during the period from 2009 to 2022. It seems that the Buccaneers and Biogenetics share more in common than meets the "aye." This research promises to shuck the public's expectations and cob-vince skeptics of the value in investigating such obscure associations. Even though the biotech industry may have grown alongside global piracy, we can assure you that these findings are far from mere "corn-spiracy theories"!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Avast, ye landlubbers and scholars alike! We are about to embark on a curious scientific journey that delves into the unexpected relationship between GMO corn production in the heartland of Indiana and the swashbuckling exploits of pirates across the globe. While some may see this as an unlikely pairing, we must remind ourselves that in science, as in life, truth can be stranger than fiction – or should we say, "arr than fiction"? It's quite the conundrum, isn't it? How could the cultivation of genetically modified corn in the fields of Indiana possibly be connected to the daring escapades of pirates on the high seas? But fear not, for we are armed not with cutlasses, but with data, statistics, and a hearty sense of humor.
The notion of drawing a link between such disparate phenomena may seem as unlikely as walking the plank, but as researchers, we are eager to sail uncharted waters and explore the unlikeliest of connections. As the old saying goes, "What do you get when you cross a pirate with a statistician? Aarrrrithmetic!" You'll find that our approach to uncovering this corn-y mystery is as serious as it is whimsical – after all, scientific inquiry should be a-maize-ing, shouldn't it?
The synergy between genetically modified organisms and pirate attacks may appear as elusive as buried treasure, but rest assured, there's no funny business here – well, except for the occasional ill-timed pun. Nevertheless, we aim to conduct a rigorous analysis that adheres to the principles of sound statistical research. As we set sail on this unorthodox scientific voyage, we invite you to join us in unraveling the kernel of truth behind this unconventional correlation – or should we say, "corn-elation"? Oh, the puns are a-plentiful, but so are the scientific insights we aim to glean from this investigation.
We believe that this research represents an opportunity to challenge preconceived notions and break free from the shackles of conventional thinking. As the saying goes, "Why don't pirates shower before they walk the plank? Because they'll just wash up on the shore later." Jokes aside, we assure you that our rigorous methodology and commitment to academic excellence will guide us through the choppy seas of academic inquiry and emerge with findings that are as robust as they are riveting. So, batten down the hatches and prepare for an academic odyssey like no other – one that promises to entertain, enlighten, and perhaps even "corn-fuse" a few along the way. Onward, toward new horizons of knowledge – just watch out for the occasional pirate pun along the way!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation have unveiled a striking correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Indiana and the occurrence of pirate attacks on a global scale. The correlation coefficient of 0.9323975 and a robust r-squared value of 0.8693650 suggest a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding is as surprising as discovering a treasure chest full of statistical significance buried at the bottom of the scientific ocean.

Our analysis of the data from 2009 to 2022 has shown a statistically significant association (p < 0.01) between the two variables. It appears that the rise in GMO corn production in Indiana coincided with an increase in pirate attacks worldwide. One might say that the pirates were feeling quite "corn-fused" during this period, facing an unexpected surge in the availability of genetically modified corn as they navigated the high seas.

Fig. 1 displays the scatterplot that visually captures the strong correlation between the use of GMOs in corn production in Indiana and global pirate attacks. This visual representation illustrates the connection between these variables with such clarity that it's almost as though the data itself is saying, "Aye, aye, Captain! There be a significant relationship here!"

The results of this study demonstrate that the perceived disconnect between GMO corn production and pirate activity may be, in fact, connected by more than just the letters "C-O-R-N." As for the pirates, we hope they're not feeling too "ARR-ogant" about their impact on global statistical trends! These findings signal the importance of considering unconventional variables when examining complex phenomena, proving that even the most unexpected pairings can yield a bounty of insight.

This research unveils a relationship that is not only statistically significant, but also ripe for further exploration, and we encourage future investigations to set sail toward unraveling the mysteries of the "corn-nection" between GMOs and global pirate activity. With a bit of statistical savvy and a dash of humor, we have unearthed a correlation that's as captivating as a pirate's treasure map.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Pirate attacks globally. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Unraveling the Kernel of Truth: Investigating the Correlation Between GMO Corn Production in Indiana and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ahoy, mateys! This paper sets sail to investigate the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Indiana and the occurrence of pirate attacks on the high seas. We embrace the challenge of explaining how these seemingly disparate elements could be connected, or "corn-nected," if you will. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, we reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9323975 and p < 0.01 during the period from 2009 to 2022. It seems that the Buccaneers and Biogenetics share more in common than meets the "aye." This research promises to shuck the public's expectations and cob-vince skeptics of the value in investigating such obscure associations. Even though the biotech industry may have grown alongside global piracy, we can assure you that these findings are far from mere "corn-spiracy theories"!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Agricultural Biotechnology and the Global Food Supply" by Smith, the authors find that the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has been a contentious issue, with concerns ranging from environmental impact to human health implications. However, amidst these debates, the widespread use of GMOs in corn cultivation has steadily increased, particularly in regions such as the state of Indiana. The application of biotechnology in agriculture has undeniably altered the landscape of crop production, offering potential benefits such as increased yield and pest resistance. Yet, as we delve into the connection between GMO corn production in Indiana and global pirate attacks, we must navigate through uncharted scholarly waters, hoping to uncover a bounty of insights that stretch far beyond the proverbial "sea" of expectations.
In "The Economics of Global Maritime Piracy" by Doe, the focus is on the economic impact of piracy on maritime trade and shipping routes. The authors detail the significant disruptions caused by pirate attacks, affecting not only the shipping industry but also international commerce. This analysis sheds light on the tangible consequences of piracy, presenting a compelling case for studying the factors that may influence the frequency and distribution of such maritime incidents. As we venture into our investigation, we are reminded that pirates may be known for their loot, but it's the correlation coefficients and p-values that truly hold the key to unlocking this enigmatic connection.
Moving beyond scholarly works to explore relevant non-fiction publications, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan offers a comprehensive examination of modern agricultural practices and their implications for the food supply chain. While Pollan's focus may not explicitly extend to maritime activities, his exploration of corn as a ubiquitous ingredient in a myriad of products serves as a reminder of the pervasiveness of this crop and its ties to various aspects of global trade and commerce. It's almost as if corn is the silent first mate on a seafaring vessel, quietly influencing the course of events from fields to far-off shores.
On the fictional front, the swashbuckling tales of the "Pirates of the Caribbean" series by Tim Powers beckon readers to embark on high-seas adventures filled with intrigue and clandestine maneuvers. While these literary works may not offer empirical data, they certainly contribute to the cultural fascination with piracy, reminding us that the allure of the open sea and the mystique of pirates continue to capture the imagination of audiences worldwide. As we navigate through the literary seas, we can't help but wonder if there's a buried statistical treasure waiting to be unearthed amidst the narratives of scalawags and scallywags.
Diverging from traditional sources, a thorough investigation of the possibly esoteric relationship between GMO corn production in Indiana and global pirate attacks also led to a rather unorthodox source – a peculiar correlation observed while scrutinizing grocery receipts from a local market. While the findings from this unconventional data collection method may raise eyebrows, they also offer a whimsical reminder that the quest for knowledge often leads researchers to unexpected territories, much like a ship caught in a whimsical whirlpool of data and dad jokes.
As we traverse the diverse seas of literature and lore, we not only encounter academic treatises and economic analyses but also venture into the realms of fiction and the unexpected. With a healthy dose of humor and an unwavering commitment to scholarly inquiry, we set our compass toward a clearer understanding of the "corn-nection" between GMO corn production in Indiana and global pirate attacks, fully prepared to weather the occasional storm of statistical silliness and the swells of scholarly whimsy. Onward, we march – or should we say, sail?

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation have unveiled a striking correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Indiana and the occurrence of pirate attacks on a global scale. The correlation coefficient of 0.9323975 and a robust r-squared value of 0.8693650 suggest a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding is as surprising as discovering a treasure chest full of statistical significance buried at the bottom of the scientific ocean.
Our analysis of the data from 2009 to 2022 has shown a statistically significant association (p < 0.01) between the two variables. It appears that the rise in GMO corn production in Indiana coincided with an increase in pirate attacks worldwide. One might say that the pirates were feeling quite "corn-fused" during this period, facing an unexpected surge in the availability of genetically modified corn as they navigated the high seas.
Fig. 1 displays the scatterplot that visually captures the strong correlation between the use of GMOs in corn production in Indiana and global pirate attacks. This visual representation illustrates the connection between these variables with such clarity that it's almost as though the data itself is saying, "Aye, aye, Captain! There be a significant relationship here!"
The results of this study demonstrate that the perceived disconnect between GMO corn production and pirate activity may be, in fact, connected by more than just the letters "C-O-R-N." As for the pirates, we hope they're not feeling too "ARR-ogant" about their impact on global statistical trends! These findings signal the importance of considering unconventional variables when examining complex phenomena, proving that even the most unexpected pairings can yield a bounty of insight.
This research unveils a relationship that is not only statistically significant, but also ripe for further exploration, and we encourage future investigations to set sail toward unraveling the mysteries of the "corn-nection" between GMOs and global pirate activity. With a bit of statistical savvy and a dash of humor, we have unearthed a correlation that's as captivating as a pirate's treasure map.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The crooked path of scientific inquiry has led us to unveil a relationship as unexpected as finding a corn cob in the bilge: the mesmerizing link between GMO corn production in Indiana and global pirate attacks. Our results not only support the prior research but also plant the seed for further exploration in this uncharted statistical ocean. It's clear as day that the pirates and the genetically modified corn are involved in a complex dance, a 'kernels' of truth awaiting to be embraced.

Our findings align with previous studies on the contentious landscape of GMO adoption, echoing concerns about environmental impact and health implications. While some may have dismissed the notion of a connection between biogenetics and buccaneers as mere "corn-spiracy theories," our robust correlation coefficient and p-value below 0.01 underscore the significance of this relationship. It appears that the pirates somehow found themselves entangled in the "stalk" market of genetically modified corn, narrating a tale of unexpected "CORN-nections" that stretch beyond the horizon.

Navigating the scholarly seas with the spirit of adventurous inquiry, we steered our ship through non-fiction and fictional accounts, inspired by the tales of scalawags and the subtle influence of corn on diverse aspects of global trade. These explorations whispered not just of statistical significance but also of the enduring allure of the open sea and the enigmatic world of pirates. It's as if we had stumbled upon a treasure map leading to statistical "booty," uncovering insights that are as captivating as a pirate's storytelling.

Embracing the statistically significant ripples of our findings, we can't help but marvel at the unexpected twists and turns of this research voyage. The robust correlation coefficient and the visually compelling scatterplot serve as testament to the "sail" and "sake" of scientific inquiry, reminding us that even the most unlikely correlations can yield the 'pearls' of statistical insight. It's almost as though the data itself is shouting, "Aye, aye, Captain! There be a significant relationship here!"

In conclusion, our results support the "captivating" idea that GMO corn production in Indiana may indeed have an influence on the occurrence of pirate attacks globally. This unearths a thrilling tale of statistical discovery, urging future investigations to set sail toward unraveling the mysteries of the "corn-nection." As we leave the harbor of this discussion, we are reminded that science and statistical inquiry hold the potential to reveal treasure troves of knowledge, often in the most unexpected "corn-ers."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Indiana and Pirate attacks globally. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Unraveling the Kernel of Truth: Investigating the Correlation Between GMO Corn Production in Indiana and Global Pirate Attacks

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ahoy, mateys! This paper sets sail to investigate the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Indiana and the occurrence of pirate attacks on the high seas. We embrace the challenge of explaining how these seemingly disparate elements could be connected, or "corn-nected," if you will. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, we reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9323975 and p < 0.01 during the period from 2009 to 2022. It seems that the Buccaneers and Biogenetics share more in common than meets the "aye." This research promises to shuck the public's expectations and cob-vince skeptics of the value in investigating such obscure associations. Even though the biotech industry may have grown alongside global piracy, we can assure you that these findings are far from mere "corn-spiracy theories"!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Avast, ye landlubbers and scholars alike! We are about to embark on a curious scientific journey that delves into the unexpected relationship between GMO corn production in the heartland of Indiana and the swashbuckling exploits of pirates across the globe. While some may see this as an unlikely pairing, we must remind ourselves that in science, as in life, truth can be stranger than fiction – or should we say, "arr than fiction"? It's quite the conundrum, isn't it? How could the cultivation of genetically modified corn in the fields of Indiana possibly be connected to the daring escapades of pirates on the high seas? But fear not, for we are armed not with cutlasses, but with data, statistics, and a hearty sense of humor.
The notion of drawing a link between such disparate phenomena may seem as unlikely as walking the plank, but as researchers, we are eager to sail uncharted waters and explore the unlikeliest of connections. As the old saying goes, "What do you get when you cross a pirate with a statistician? Aarrrrithmetic!" You'll find that our approach to uncovering this corn-y mystery is as serious as it is whimsical – after all, scientific inquiry should be a-maize-ing, shouldn't it?
The synergy between genetically modified organisms and pirate attacks may appear as elusive as buried treasure, but rest assured, there's no funny business here – well, except for the occasional ill-timed pun. Nevertheless, we aim to conduct a rigorous analysis that adheres to the principles of sound statistical research. As we set sail on this unorthodox scientific voyage, we invite you to join us in unraveling the kernel of truth behind this unconventional correlation – or should we say, "corn-elation"? Oh, the puns are a-plentiful, but so are the scientific insights we aim to glean from this investigation.
We believe that this research represents an opportunity to challenge preconceived notions and break free from the shackles of conventional thinking. As the saying goes, "Why don't pirates shower before they walk the plank? Because they'll just wash up on the shore later." Jokes aside, we assure you that our rigorous methodology and commitment to academic excellence will guide us through the choppy seas of academic inquiry and emerge with findings that are as robust as they are riveting. So, batten down the hatches and prepare for an academic odyssey like no other – one that promises to entertain, enlighten, and perhaps even "corn-fuse" a few along the way. Onward, toward new horizons of knowledge – just watch out for the occasional pirate pun along the way!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation have unveiled a striking correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Indiana and the occurrence of pirate attacks on a global scale. The correlation coefficient of 0.9323975 and a robust r-squared value of 0.8693650 suggest a strong relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. This finding is as surprising as discovering a treasure chest full of statistical significance buried at the bottom of the scientific ocean.
Our analysis of the data from 2009 to 2022 has shown a statistically significant association (p < 0.01) between the two variables. It appears that the rise in GMO corn production in Indiana coincided with an increase in pirate attacks worldwide. One might say that the pirates were feeling quite "corn-fused" during this period, facing an unexpected surge in the availability of genetically modified corn as they navigated the high seas.
Fig. 1 displays the scatterplot that visually captures the strong correlation between the use of GMOs in corn production in Indiana and global pirate attacks. This visual representation illustrates the connection between these variables with such clarity that it's almost as though the data itself is saying, "Aye, aye, Captain! There be a significant relationship here!"
The results of this study demonstrate that the perceived disconnect between GMO corn production and pirate activity may be, in fact, connected by more than just the letters "C-O-R-N." As for the pirates, we hope they're not feeling too "ARR-ogant" about their impact on global statistical trends! These findings signal the importance of considering unconventional variables when examining complex phenomena, proving that even the most unexpected pairings can yield a bounty of insight.
This research unveils a relationship that is not only statistically significant, but also ripe for further exploration, and we encourage future investigations to set sail toward unraveling the mysteries of the "corn-nection" between GMOs and global pirate activity. With a bit of statistical savvy and a dash of humor, we have unearthed a correlation that's as captivating as a pirate's treasure map.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our voyage into the uncharted waters of statistical inquiry has confirmed a robust and significant correlation between the use of GMOs in corn production in Indiana and global pirate attacks. The magnitude of this relationship is as clear as a pirate's "aye" to a treasure chest. While some may find this link as improbable as a pirate saying "Ahoy, statistician!", our findings undeniably point to a compelling association with a wealth of significance.

It's safe to say that the pirates couldn't help but feel "corn-fused" as the availability of genetically modified corn surged while they navigated the high seas. Perhaps they found themselves pondering the question of "GMO or not to GMO," just as Hamlet contemplated the sea of troubles. These results prove that even the most unexpected pairings can yield a bounty of insights, much like stumbling upon a chest full of treasure in the midst of statistical inquiry.

Our findings emphasize the importance of considering unconventional variables in research, and they urge future investigations to set sail toward unraveling the mysteries of the "corn-nection" between GMOs and global pirate activity. While we've had a whale of a time unearthing these insights, we must concur that no further research is needed in this area. After all, we've already uncovered more "corn-nections" than a farm has rows of maize.

As they say, "Why did the pirate go into statistics? Because it arrrrrr-guably the most interesting field of study!"

No more research is needed in this area, mates.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Unraveling the Kernel of Truth: Investigating the Correlation Between GMO Corn Production in Indiana and Global Pirate Attacks. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Anomalies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Unraveling the Kernel of Truth: Investigating the Correlation Between GMO Corn Production in Indiana and Global Pirate Attacks. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for the Advancement of Agricultural Anomalies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Unraveling the Kernel of Truth: Investigating the Correlation Between GMO Corn Production in Indiana and Global Pirate Attacks with an abstract of Ahoy, mateys! This paper sets sail to investigate the peculiar relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Indiana and the occurrence of pirate attacks on the high seas. We embrace the challenge of explaining how these seemingly disparate elements could be connected, or "corn-nected," if you will. Utilizing data from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Statista, we reveal a surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9323975 and p < 0.01 during the period from 2009 to 2022. It seems that the Buccaneers and Biogenetics share more in common than meets the "aye." This research promises to shuck the public's expectations and cob-vince skeptics of the value in investigating such obscure associations. Even though the biotech industry may have grown alongside global piracy, we can assure you that these findings are far from mere "corn-spiracy theories"!

ChatGPT:

"GMO corn production Indiana pirate attacks correlation", "USDA GMO corn data", "biotechnology industry global piracy correlation", "Statista GMO corn production statistics", "agricultural biotechnology piracy correlation", "GMO corn impact global piracy", "genetically modified organisms agriculture piracy connection"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Indiana
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Indiana that is genetically modified to be herbicide-tolerant (HT), but not insect-resistant (Bt)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Indiana

Pirate attacks globally
Detailed data title: Global Pirate Attack Count
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Pirate attacks globally

Correlation r = 0.9323975 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8693650 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 86.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Pirate attacks globally) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Indiana) over the 14 years from 2009 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.2E-6. 0.0000011898943472072365000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.93 in 0.00012% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 840,411 random variables You don't actually need 840 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 13 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 13 because we have two variables measured over a period of 14 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.8, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in corn grown in Indiana (GMO corn %)1720221510889979977
Pirate attacks globally (Number of Attacks)410445439297264245246191180201162195132115




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([17,20,22,15,10,8,8,9,9,7,9,9,7,7,])
array_2 = np.array([410,445,439,297,264,245,246,191,180,201,162,195,132,115,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Indiana"
array_2_name = "Pirate attacks globally"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 2846 · Black Variable ID: 726 · Red Variable ID: 488
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0