Download png, svg
AI explanation
As more people earned Master's degrees in Legal professions and studies, they became experts in finding loopholes and crafting foolproof immigration strategies. It's like they put the Norwegian immigration laws on trial and won every time. Plus, maybe they started offering a two-for-one deal - immigrate to Norway and get legal advice in the process!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [High-tech] Prompt: In a bustling library, the graduates are proudly holding their Master's degrees in Legal professions and studies, with their graduation gowns billowing behind them as they stand in a row. On the other side of the room, a person sits at a computer with a determined look, typing "how to immigrate to Norway" into Google search. The air is filled with a sense of ambition and possibility as these newly-minted experts explore the next chapter of their careers. The scene is bathed in a modern, high-tech lighting, with sleek and minimalist furnishings that echo the theme of progress and advancement. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Master's degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Charcoal Charcoal High-tech Minimalism Magic realism
ChatGPT: High-tech
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Master's degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway', in the following situation: Because as the number of Master's degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies increases, more people become experts in finding loopholes in immigration laws, leading to a surge in Google searches for "how to immigrate to Norway" as they seek out new opportunities to practice their skills in a different jurisdiction.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling library, a group of graduates proudly hold their Master's degrees in Legal professions and studies, their graduation gowns billowing behind them as they stand in a row. On the other side of the room, a person sits at a computer with a determined look, typing "how to immigrate to Norway" into Google search. The air is filled with a sense of ambition and possibility as these newly-minted experts explore the next chapter of their careers.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling library, a group of graduates proudly hold their Master's degrees in Legal professions and studies, their graduation gowns billowing behind them as they stand in a row. On the other side of the room, a person sits at a computer with a determined look, typing "how to immigrate to Norway" into Google search. The air is filled with a sense of ambition and possibility as these newly-minted experts explore the next chapter of their careers. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [High-tech] Prompt: In a bustling library, the graduates are proudly holding their Master's degrees in Legal professions and studies, with their graduation gowns billowing behind them as they stand in a row. On the other side of the room, a person sits at a computer with a determined look, typing "how to immigrate to Norway" into Google search. The air is filled with a sense of ambition and possibility as these newly-minted experts explore the next chapter of their careers. The scene is bathed in a modern, high-tech lighting, with sleek and minimalist furnishings that echo the theme of progress and advancement.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in Master's degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies positively influenced how to immigrate to norway (Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway').
AI academic paper
From Juris Doctor to Fjords: A Correlation Between Legal Education and Aspiring Norwegians The Journal of Legal and Nordic Studies Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title seem clever.
Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9188127 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
From Juris Doctor to Fjords: A Correlation Between Legal Education and Aspiring Norwegians
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected link between Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies and individuals' utilization of online resources to explore immigration opportunities in Norway. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9188127 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2021. The findings imply that as legal education pursuits increase, there is a proportional rise in individuals seeking information on how to immigrate to the land of breathtaking fjords and possibly legal precedents with a Scandinavian twist. This unexpected correlation raises intriguing questions about the relationship between legal aspirations and yearning for northern adventures, shedding light on the interplay of career interests and wanderlust.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Juris Doctor to Fjords: A Correlation Between Legal Education and Aspiring Norwegians
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected link between Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies and individuals' utilization of online resources to explore immigration opportunities in Norway. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9188127 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2021. The findings imply that as legal education pursuits increase, there is a proportional rise in individuals seeking information on how to immigrate to the land of breathtaking fjords and possibly legal precedents with a Scandinavian twist. This unexpected correlation raises intriguing questions about the relationship between legal aspirations and yearning for northern adventures, shedding light on the interplay of career interests and wanderlust.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the vast world of academia, one can stumble upon correlations that are as surprising as a physicist's inexplicable fascination with fishing. The intersection of legal education and the quest for fjords has long been an uncharted territory, akin to uncovering the elusive connection between dark matter and dad jokes. However, as researchers, it is our duty to scrutinize these unconventional associations, even if it leads us down a rabbit hole more twisty than a post-modern novel.
The relationship between the legal profession and aspirations to relocate to Norway is a peculiar one, with as many perplexities as a quantum particle's wavering disposition. While one may expect the legal realm to be entangled with lofty proclamations and weighty tomes, the allure of Scandinavian migration seems to insert a whimsical subplot into this narrative. It's as if the statutes and the fjords have birthed an alliance as enigmatic as a statistical outlier in a dataset.
Through the lens of research and statistics, we find ourselves embarking on a voyage more intriguing than a botanist's pursuit of the world's rarest fern. In this expedition, we aim to unravel the enigma that lies within the pursuit of legal knowledge and the yearning for northern escapades that may seem as improbable as a quantum particle jumping between parallel universes. Our odyssey is guided by the hypothesis that an increase in Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies is positively associated with an augmented interest in immigrating to the Nordic utopia, as if the scales of justice are being balanced on snow-capped peaks.
Our pursuit of understanding this improbable liaison leads us to pore over data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, employing the precision of a chemist titrating a volatile concoction. Our findings, as we shall reveal, hold implications as profound as an economist's discovery of a hidden factor in the dynamics of supply and demand. Join us in this scholarly escapade as we delve into the correlation coefficient of 0.9188127 and the significance level of p < 0.01 that unveiled this unforeseen bond. Let us embark on this scholarly journey, where the legal mind meets the yearning for Norwegian fjords, in an academic quest as puzzling as a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Juris Doctor to Fjords: A Correlation Between Legal Education and Aspiring Norwegians
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected link between Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies and individuals' utilization of online resources to explore immigration opportunities in Norway. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9188127 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2021. The findings imply that as legal education pursuits increase, there is a proportional rise in individuals seeking information on how to immigrate to the land of breathtaking fjords and possibly legal precedents with a Scandinavian twist. This unexpected correlation raises intriguing questions about the relationship between legal aspirations and yearning for northern adventures, shedding light on the interplay of career interests and wanderlust.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the vast world of academia, one can stumble upon correlations that are as surprising as a physicist's inexplicable fascination with fishing. The intersection of legal education and the quest for fjords has long been an uncharted territory, akin to uncovering the elusive connection between dark matter and dad jokes. However, as researchers, it is our duty to scrutinize these unconventional associations, even if it leads us down a rabbit hole more twisty than a post-modern novel.
The relationship between the legal profession and aspirations to relocate to Norway is a peculiar one, with as many perplexities as a quantum particle's wavering disposition. While one may expect the legal realm to be entangled with lofty proclamations and weighty tomes, the allure of Scandinavian migration seems to insert a whimsical subplot into this narrative. It's as if the statutes and the fjords have birthed an alliance as enigmatic as a statistical outlier in a dataset.
Through the lens of research and statistics, we find ourselves embarking on a voyage more intriguing than a botanist's pursuit of the world's rarest fern. In this expedition, we aim to unravel the enigma that lies within the pursuit of legal knowledge and the yearning for northern escapades that may seem as improbable as a quantum particle jumping between parallel universes. Our odyssey is guided by the hypothesis that an increase in Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies is positively associated with an augmented interest in immigrating to the Nordic utopia, as if the scales of justice are being balanced on snow-capped peaks.
Our pursuit of understanding this improbable liaison leads us to pore over data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, employing the precision of a chemist titrating a volatile concoction. Our findings, as we shall reveal, hold implications as profound as an economist's discovery of a hidden factor in the dynamics of supply and demand. Join us in this scholarly escapade as we delve into the correlation coefficient of 0.9188127 and the significance level of p < 0.01 that unveiled this unforeseen bond. Let us embark on this scholarly journey, where the legal mind meets the yearning for Norwegian fjords, in an academic quest as puzzling as a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The curious correlation between Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies and the burgeoning interest in immigrating to Norway has elicited a plethora of speculations and scholarly inquiries. Smith and Doe (2018) documented the rise in enrollment in legal education programs over the past decade, coinciding with an upsurge in searches for information regarding Norwegian immigration procedures. Their analysis provides a robust foundation for examining this intriguing relationship, prompting further exploration into the intersection of jurisprudential pursuits and an affinity for Nordic relocation.
Jones (2016) contributes to this discourse by emphasizing the shifting trends in legal career aspirations and the aspirational yearning for a life amidst Norwegian fjords. Their work illuminates the complex interplay between professional ambitions in the legal realm and the allure of a Scandinavian lifestyle, paving the way for investigating the unexpected confluence of legal expertise and Northern desires.
In "The Legal Odyssey to Nordic Shores" by Anderson et al. (2020), the authors delve into the narratives of legal professionals who have embarked on the pursuit of Norwegian residency, unraveling anecdotes that underscore the irrefutable magnetism of Norwegian landscapes and the legal mind. As the authors weave tales of legal practitioners finding their way to Norway, this work underscores the intricate rapport between legal acumen and the magnetic pull of fjords, akin to a legal thriller set against a backdrop of aurora-lit skies.
Now, turning to broader literature on migration and legal studies, "Immigration and the Legal Mind" by Summers (2015) offers insights into the psychological underpinnings of individuals considering migration amidst their legal pursuits. While not explicitly focused on Norway, Summers' exploration sheds light on the nuanced motivations that underpin the synergy between legal education and the contemplation of international relocation, reminding us that the allure of fjords may hold universal appeal irrespective of legal specialization.
While the literature on this specific correlation is still emerging, fiction works such as "The Case of the Elusive Fjord" by A. Novel (2019) and "Law and Fjord-er: Scales of Justice in the Land of the Midnight Sun" by B. Writer (2017) infuse a touch of whimsy into the realm of legal narratives intertwined with Scandinavian aspirations, offering a creative lens through which to contemplate this connection. As if the legal minds and the fjords have become entangled in a plot as convoluted as a Nordic noir mystery, these works remind us of the delightfully peculiar intersection between legal sagas and Northern yearnings.
In the realm of popular culture, the meme "Scandinavian Legal Eagle" has garnered traction online, humorously juxtaposing legal jargon with whimsical references to Nordic landscapes and immigration queries. As the meme culture imparts a dose of levity to this scholarly pursuit, it underscores the widespread fascination with the juxtaposition of legal pursuits and the allure of Northern migration, akin to a meme as unexpected as a display of cosmic legal humor.
This juxtaposition of legal education pursuits and yearnings for newfound horizons presents a prism of curiosity for future investigations, reminding us that scholarly pursuits, like life itself, can unveil unexpected twists and turns, much like a Nordic saga brimming with serendipitous encounters.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends . You used data from 2012 to 2021
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Juris Doctor to Fjords: A Correlation Between Legal Education and Aspiring Norwegians
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected link between Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies and individuals' utilization of online resources to explore immigration opportunities in Norway. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9188127 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2021. The findings imply that as legal education pursuits increase, there is a proportional rise in individuals seeking information on how to immigrate to the land of breathtaking fjords and possibly legal precedents with a Scandinavian twist. This unexpected correlation raises intriguing questions about the relationship between legal aspirations and yearning for northern adventures, shedding light on the interplay of career interests and wanderlust.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
In the vast world of academia, one can stumble upon correlations that are as surprising as a physicist's inexplicable fascination with fishing. The intersection of legal education and the quest for fjords has long been an uncharted territory, akin to uncovering the elusive connection between dark matter and dad jokes. However, as researchers, it is our duty to scrutinize these unconventional associations, even if it leads us down a rabbit hole more twisty than a post-modern novel.
The relationship between the legal profession and aspirations to relocate to Norway is a peculiar one, with as many perplexities as a quantum particle's wavering disposition. While one may expect the legal realm to be entangled with lofty proclamations and weighty tomes, the allure of Scandinavian migration seems to insert a whimsical subplot into this narrative. It's as if the statutes and the fjords have birthed an alliance as enigmatic as a statistical outlier in a dataset.
Through the lens of research and statistics, we find ourselves embarking on a voyage more intriguing than a botanist's pursuit of the world's rarest fern. In this expedition, we aim to unravel the enigma that lies within the pursuit of legal knowledge and the yearning for northern escapades that may seem as improbable as a quantum particle jumping between parallel universes. Our odyssey is guided by the hypothesis that an increase in Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies is positively associated with an augmented interest in immigrating to the Nordic utopia, as if the scales of justice are being balanced on snow-capped peaks.
Our pursuit of understanding this improbable liaison leads us to pore over data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, employing the precision of a chemist titrating a volatile concoction. Our findings, as we shall reveal, hold implications as profound as an economist's discovery of a hidden factor in the dynamics of supply and demand. Join us in this scholarly escapade as we delve into the correlation coefficient of 0.9188127 and the significance level of p < 0.01 that unveiled this unforeseen bond. Let us embark on this scholarly journey, where the legal mind meets the yearning for Norwegian fjords, in an academic quest as puzzling as a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[METHODOLOGY]
To unravel the entwined tapestry of legal pursuits and Scandinavian dreams, our research team devised a methodology as intricate as a molecular biologist's quest to decode the genome of a tardigrade. First, we embarked on a cybernetic expedition, scouring the vast expanses of the internet, much like a sailor on an uncharted sea, to acquire data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends for the years 2012 to 2021. The use of these sources not only provided a wide-ranging dataset but also injected a touch of verisimilitude into our study, akin to infusing a lab experiment with the hum of a jazz quartet.
Our initial step involved the extraction of data on the number of Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies, measured with the precision of a watchmaker crafting the cogs of time. This was juxtaposed with data on the frequency of Google searches for "how to immigrate to Norway," as though we were aligning particle accelerators to explore the outer bounds of physics. The process of merging these disparate yet tantalizing variables was akin to the choreography of a ballet, where each step and pirouette led us closer to unraveling the enigmatic correlation hidden within.
Next, employing statistical techniques as robust as a medieval fortress and as elegant as a Shakespearean sonnet, we calculated the correlation coefficient between these two sets of data. Our statistical arsenal included the Pearson correlation coefficient, which we wielded as deftly as Newton's laws of motion guide the trajectory of celestial bodies. With a significance level of p < 0.01, our findings emerged from the figurative mist of uncertainty like a treasure charted from the depths of the ocean.
The culmination of our methodology embraced the holistic spirit of a Renaissance painting, where we contextualized our findings within the broader socio-cultural landscape. This multidisciplinary perspective added layers to our research akin to the intricate patina of an antique watch, bringing forth a rich narrative deserving of scholarly exploration.
In this pursuit, we anchored our study with the precision of a cartographer plotting constellations, and with the unwavering curiosity of a seeker on a quest for an elusive grail, to unravel this unexpected linkage between legal education and the allure of Norwegian horizons.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends .
For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9188127, r-squared of 0.8442167, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Juris Doctor to Fjords: A Correlation Between Legal Education and Aspiring Norwegians
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected link between Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies and individuals' utilization of online resources to explore immigration opportunities in Norway. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9188127 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2021. The findings imply that as legal education pursuits increase, there is a proportional rise in individuals seeking information on how to immigrate to the land of breathtaking fjords and possibly legal precedents with a Scandinavian twist. This unexpected correlation raises intriguing questions about the relationship between legal aspirations and yearning for northern adventures, shedding light on the interplay of career interests and wanderlust.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
In the vast world of academia, one can stumble upon correlations that are as surprising as a physicist's inexplicable fascination with fishing. The intersection of legal education and the quest for fjords has long been an uncharted territory, akin to uncovering the elusive connection between dark matter and dad jokes. However, as researchers, it is our duty to scrutinize these unconventional associations, even if it leads us down a rabbit hole more twisty than a post-modern novel.
The relationship between the legal profession and aspirations to relocate to Norway is a peculiar one, with as many perplexities as a quantum particle's wavering disposition. While one may expect the legal realm to be entangled with lofty proclamations and weighty tomes, the allure of Scandinavian migration seems to insert a whimsical subplot into this narrative. It's as if the statutes and the fjords have birthed an alliance as enigmatic as a statistical outlier in a dataset.
Through the lens of research and statistics, we find ourselves embarking on a voyage more intriguing than a botanist's pursuit of the world's rarest fern. In this expedition, we aim to unravel the enigma that lies within the pursuit of legal knowledge and the yearning for northern escapades that may seem as improbable as a quantum particle jumping between parallel universes. Our odyssey is guided by the hypothesis that an increase in Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies is positively associated with an augmented interest in immigrating to the Nordic utopia, as if the scales of justice are being balanced on snow-capped peaks.
Our pursuit of understanding this improbable liaison leads us to pore over data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, employing the precision of a chemist titrating a volatile concoction. Our findings, as we shall reveal, hold implications as profound as an economist's discovery of a hidden factor in the dynamics of supply and demand. Join us in this scholarly escapade as we delve into the correlation coefficient of 0.9188127 and the significance level of p < 0.01 that unveiled this unforeseen bond. Let us embark on this scholarly journey, where the legal mind meets the yearning for Norwegian fjords, in an academic quest as puzzling as a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis conducted on the Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies and the Google search queries for 'how to immigrate to Norway' revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9188127. The relationship exhibited a strong positive correlation, suggesting that as the number of Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies increased, there was a corresponding surge in Google searches on immigration to Norway. This correlation coefficient was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8442167, further affirming the robustness of the association between the two variables.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) presents a clear depiction of the positive relationship between the pursuit of legal education and the yearning for Norwegian exploration. The graph aligns with our findings, illustrating a trend as clear as an meticulously prepared lab report. It visually encapsulates the synchrony between legal education and the attraction to the allure of Norway, much like a perfectly harmonized chemical reaction.
The observed p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforced the significance of the correlation, as if the data were as resounding as a groundbreaking theorem in the intellectual domain.
These results hint at an unexpected intertwining of legal education pursuits and the desire to venture into the scenic fjords of Norway, culminating in an academic revelation as surprising as an economist's sudden realization of a hidden gem in the market trends.
These findings serve as a testament to the somewhat whimsical interplay between legal aspirations and the allure of Norwegian immigration, presenting an academic mystery as captivating as a gripping novel awaiting its denouement.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
From Juris Doctor to Fjords: A Correlation Between Legal Education and Aspiring Norwegians
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected link between Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies and individuals' utilization of online resources to explore immigration opportunities in Norway. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9188127 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2021. The findings imply that as legal education pursuits increase, there is a proportional rise in individuals seeking information on how to immigrate to the land of breathtaking fjords and possibly legal precedents with a Scandinavian twist. This unexpected correlation raises intriguing questions about the relationship between legal aspirations and yearning for northern adventures, shedding light on the interplay of career interests and wanderlust.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The curious correlation between Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies and the burgeoning interest in immigrating to Norway has elicited a plethora of speculations and scholarly inquiries. Smith and Doe (2018) documented the rise in enrollment in legal education programs over the past decade, coinciding with an upsurge in searches for information regarding Norwegian immigration procedures. Their analysis provides a robust foundation for examining this intriguing relationship, prompting further exploration into the intersection of jurisprudential pursuits and an affinity for Nordic relocation.
Jones (2016) contributes to this discourse by emphasizing the shifting trends in legal career aspirations and the aspirational yearning for a life amidst Norwegian fjords. Their work illuminates the complex interplay between professional ambitions in the legal realm and the allure of a Scandinavian lifestyle, paving the way for investigating the unexpected confluence of legal expertise and Northern desires.
In "The Legal Odyssey to Nordic Shores" by Anderson et al. (2020), the authors delve into the narratives of legal professionals who have embarked on the pursuit of Norwegian residency, unraveling anecdotes that underscore the irrefutable magnetism of Norwegian landscapes and the legal mind. As the authors weave tales of legal practitioners finding their way to Norway, this work underscores the intricate rapport between legal acumen and the magnetic pull of fjords, akin to a legal thriller set against a backdrop of aurora-lit skies.
Now, turning to broader literature on migration and legal studies, "Immigration and the Legal Mind" by Summers (2015) offers insights into the psychological underpinnings of individuals considering migration amidst their legal pursuits. While not explicitly focused on Norway, Summers' exploration sheds light on the nuanced motivations that underpin the synergy between legal education and the contemplation of international relocation, reminding us that the allure of fjords may hold universal appeal irrespective of legal specialization.
While the literature on this specific correlation is still emerging, fiction works such as "The Case of the Elusive Fjord" by A. Novel (2019) and "Law and Fjord-er: Scales of Justice in the Land of the Midnight Sun" by B. Writer (2017) infuse a touch of whimsy into the realm of legal narratives intertwined with Scandinavian aspirations, offering a creative lens through which to contemplate this connection. As if the legal minds and the fjords have become entangled in a plot as convoluted as a Nordic noir mystery, these works remind us of the delightfully peculiar intersection between legal sagas and Northern yearnings.
In the realm of popular culture, the meme "Scandinavian Legal Eagle" has garnered traction online, humorously juxtaposing legal jargon with whimsical references to Nordic landscapes and immigration queries. As the meme culture imparts a dose of levity to this scholarly pursuit, it underscores the widespread fascination with the juxtaposition of legal pursuits and the allure of Northern migration, akin to a meme as unexpected as a display of cosmic legal humor.
This juxtaposition of legal education pursuits and yearnings for newfound horizons presents a prism of curiosity for future investigations, reminding us that scholarly pursuits, like life itself, can unveil unexpected twists and turns, much like a Nordic saga brimming with serendipitous encounters.
[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis conducted on the Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies and the Google search queries for 'how to immigrate to Norway' revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9188127. The relationship exhibited a strong positive correlation, suggesting that as the number of Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies increased, there was a corresponding surge in Google searches on immigration to Norway. This correlation coefficient was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8442167, further affirming the robustness of the association between the two variables.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) presents a clear depiction of the positive relationship between the pursuit of legal education and the yearning for Norwegian exploration. The graph aligns with our findings, illustrating a trend as clear as an meticulously prepared lab report. It visually encapsulates the synchrony between legal education and the attraction to the allure of Norway, much like a perfectly harmonized chemical reaction.
The observed p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforced the significance of the correlation, as if the data were as resounding as a groundbreaking theorem in the intellectual domain.
These results hint at an unexpected intertwining of legal education pursuits and the desire to venture into the scenic fjords of Norway, culminating in an academic revelation as surprising as an economist's sudden realization of a hidden gem in the market trends.
These findings serve as a testament to the somewhat whimsical interplay between legal aspirations and the allure of Norwegian immigration, presenting an academic mystery as captivating as a gripping novel awaiting its denouement.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The results of our study illuminate an unanticipated and compelling relationship between legal education and the aspiration for Nordic migration, akin to a riveting legal drama with a dash of Scandinavian intrigue. Our findings not only echo the prior research suggesting a link between legal pursuits and the allure of Norwegian landscapes but also robustly establish the statistical significance of this correlation, as if the data were as compelling as a case-closing argument. The unexpected synchrony between legal expertise and Nordic yearning opens a Pandora's box of inquiries, much like an enigmatic riddle awaiting a deft legal solution.
The literature review, with its diverse strands ranging from scholarly inquiries to popular memes, provides a rich tapestry of evidence that lays the groundwork for our findings. It evokes the curious fusion of legal sagas and Norwegian aspirations, imprinting upon our study the charm of an intellectual treasure hunt amidst the fjords of interdisciplinary exploration. While some voices in the literature may have seemed whimsical, we have underscored their serious importance and pursued this research earnestly, much like embarking on a truth-seeking legal quest.
The high correlation coefficient speaks volumes about the resonance between legal education pursuits and the magnetic pull of Norwegian dreams, resembling a symphony of statistical harmony. The robust r-squared value further bolsters the weight of this connection, akin to a veritable legal precedent firmly established in the annals of statistical jurisprudence.
Our findings carry implications that extend beyond statistical fascination, offering glimpses into the whimsical dance between professional aspirations and wanderlust, much like a choreography of academic intrigue. At the crux of this surprising correlation lies a story as whimsical as a tale spun by a legal bard amidst the fjords. These results have imbued our study with the aura of an intellectual journey as captivating as a gripping legal thriller, inviting future researchers to unravel the enigmatic connection between legal pursuits and the allure of Norwegian fjords.
In the absence of this unexpected correlation, our study would merely be a dry exposition of data, much like a legal document bereft of the Nordic whimsy that now imbues it. As researchers, it is our duty to explore and appreciate the unexpected connections, much like a legal mind uncovering hidden facets of a complex case. Our study, in the true spirit of scientific inquiry, has brought to light a most unexpected correlation that is as compelling as a legal narrative unfolding against the backdrop of the ethereal Northern lights.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
From Juris Doctor to Fjords: A Correlation Between Legal Education and Aspiring Norwegians
[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the unexpected link between Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies and individuals' utilization of online resources to explore immigration opportunities in Norway. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9188127 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2021. The findings imply that as legal education pursuits increase, there is a proportional rise in individuals seeking information on how to immigrate to the land of breathtaking fjords and possibly legal precedents with a Scandinavian twist. This unexpected correlation raises intriguing questions about the relationship between legal aspirations and yearning for northern adventures, shedding light on the interplay of career interests and wanderlust.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
In the vast world of academia, one can stumble upon correlations that are as surprising as a physicist's inexplicable fascination with fishing. The intersection of legal education and the quest for fjords has long been an uncharted territory, akin to uncovering the elusive connection between dark matter and dad jokes. However, as researchers, it is our duty to scrutinize these unconventional associations, even if it leads us down a rabbit hole more twisty than a post-modern novel.
The relationship between the legal profession and aspirations to relocate to Norway is a peculiar one, with as many perplexities as a quantum particle's wavering disposition. While one may expect the legal realm to be entangled with lofty proclamations and weighty tomes, the allure of Scandinavian migration seems to insert a whimsical subplot into this narrative. It's as if the statutes and the fjords have birthed an alliance as enigmatic as a statistical outlier in a dataset.
Through the lens of research and statistics, we find ourselves embarking on a voyage more intriguing than a botanist's pursuit of the world's rarest fern. In this expedition, we aim to unravel the enigma that lies within the pursuit of legal knowledge and the yearning for northern escapades that may seem as improbable as a quantum particle jumping between parallel universes. Our odyssey is guided by the hypothesis that an increase in Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies is positively associated with an augmented interest in immigrating to the Nordic utopia, as if the scales of justice are being balanced on snow-capped peaks.
Our pursuit of understanding this improbable liaison leads us to pore over data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, employing the precision of a chemist titrating a volatile concoction. Our findings, as we shall reveal, hold implications as profound as an economist's discovery of a hidden factor in the dynamics of supply and demand. Join us in this scholarly escapade as we delve into the correlation coefficient of 0.9188127 and the significance level of p < 0.01 that unveiled this unforeseen bond. Let us embark on this scholarly journey, where the legal mind meets the yearning for Norwegian fjords, in an academic quest as puzzling as a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.
[[RESULTS]]
The correlation analysis conducted on the Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies and the Google search queries for 'how to immigrate to Norway' revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9188127. The relationship exhibited a strong positive correlation, suggesting that as the number of Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies increased, there was a corresponding surge in Google searches on immigration to Norway. This correlation coefficient was accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8442167, further affirming the robustness of the association between the two variables.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) presents a clear depiction of the positive relationship between the pursuit of legal education and the yearning for Norwegian exploration. The graph aligns with our findings, illustrating a trend as clear as an meticulously prepared lab report. It visually encapsulates the synchrony between legal education and the attraction to the allure of Norway, much like a perfectly harmonized chemical reaction.
The observed p-value of less than 0.01 further reinforced the significance of the correlation, as if the data were as resounding as a groundbreaking theorem in the intellectual domain.
These results hint at an unexpected intertwining of legal education pursuits and the desire to venture into the scenic fjords of Norway, culminating in an academic revelation as surprising as an economist's sudden realization of a hidden gem in the market trends.
These findings serve as a testament to the somewhat whimsical interplay between legal aspirations and the allure of Norwegian immigration, presenting an academic mystery as captivating as a gripping novel awaiting its denouement.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our expedition into the peculiar correlation between Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies and the Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Norway' has unraveled a connection as unexpected as a chemist discovering a new element in a remote corner of the periodic table. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9188127, accompanied by an r-squared value of 0.8442167, implies a compelling relationship with a certainty as striking as a physicist's certainty in the laws of thermodynamics. The visual representation of this correlation in the scatterplot (Fig. 1) is as clear as day, painting a picture as coherent as a perfectly balanced chemical equation.
Unveiling this unanticipated bond between legal education pursuits and a fascination with Nordic adventures sheds light on an enigma as intriguing as a cryptic crossword puzzle. The interplay of legal aspirations and the allure of Norwegian migration serves as a testament to the whimsical twists and turns that can emerge in the academic realm, akin to stumbling upon a hilarious joke in the footnotes of a weighty tome.
With these findings in mind, we assert that no additional research is needed in this particular area, as the correlation we have unearthed is as solid as a well-constructed statistical model. In the end, this research leaves us with the whimsical realization that even in the seemingly serious world of legal education and immigration aspirations, there may be elements of surprise and humor waiting to be discovered, much like a punchline hidden in a complex legal clause.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Juris Doctor to Fjords: A Correlation Between Legal Education and Aspiring Norwegians. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Legal and Nordic Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Juris Doctor to Fjords: A Correlation Between Legal Education and Aspiring Norwegians. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Transnational Legal Studies
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Juris Doctor to Fjords: A Correlation Between Legal Education and Aspiring Norwegians with an abstract of This study delves into the unexpected link between Master's degrees awarded in legal professions and studies and individuals' utilization of online resources to explore immigration opportunities in Norway. Utilizing data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Google Trends, our research team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9188127 with a significance level of p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2012 to 2021. The findings imply that as legal education pursuits increase, there is a proportional rise in individuals seeking information on how to immigrate to the land of breathtaking fjords and possibly legal precedents with a Scandinavian twist. This unexpected correlation raises intriguing questions about the relationship between legal aspirations and yearning for northern adventures, shedding light on the interplay of career interests and wanderlust.
ChatGPT:
Juris Doctor, legal education, immigration to Norway, Google Trends, Master's degrees, National Center for Education Statistics, Scandinavian immigration, legal professions, career aspirations, wanderlust, correlation coefficients, online resources
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Master's degrees awarded in Legal professions and studiesDetailed data title: Master's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions in Legal professions and studies
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Master's degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies
Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)
See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.8442167 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 84.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Master's degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00017. 0.0001721784996873846000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 0.017% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 5,808 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.69, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | |
Master's degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies (Degrees awarded) | 6614 | 7013 | 7654 | 7924 | 8181 | 8674 | 9203 | 9487 | 10024 | 7038 |
Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway' (Rel. search volume) | 5.66667 | 6.16667 | 6.08333 | 5.83333 | 6.75 | 6.91667 | 7.41667 | 7.08333 | 8.41667 | 5.91667 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([6614,7013,7654,7924,8181,8674,9203,9487,10024,7038,])
array_2 = np.array([5.66667,6.16667,6.08333,5.83333,6.75,6.91667,7.41667,7.08333,8.41667,5.91667,])
array_1_name = "Master's degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Master's degrees awarded in Legal professions and studies
- Line chart for only Google searches for 'how to immigrate to norway'
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: From Juris Doctor to Fjords: A Correlation Between Legal Education and Aspiring Norwegians
Your rating skills are legendary!
Correlation ID: 2836 · Black Variable ID: 1327 · Red Variable ID: 1351