about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,831 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Lucas and the second variable is Hydopower energy generated in Bhutan.  The chart goes from 1980 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Every time someone named Lucas walked into a room, they exuded such electrifying charm and appeal that the nearby water molecules couldn't help but align themselves accordingly, creating a small but significant surge in hydropower energy. It seems the connection between Lucas and hydro is truly current!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image in the style of data cyber art depicting Bhutan's mountainous landscape with rushing rivers and interconnected streams of digital energy. Show the fusion of natural forces and technological power as hydropower turbines harness the flowing water, illuminating homes and streets in vibrant, pulsating light. Emphasize the interplay between traditional and futuristic elements, highlighting the name "Lucas" in a subtle yet resonant manner within the visual composition. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Lucas and Hydopower energy generated in Bhutan. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Scalar art High-tech Psychedelic Data cyber art Photorealism
ChatGPT: Data cyber art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Lucas and Hydopower energy generated in Bhutan, in the following situation: Because as the name Lucas gained popularity, more people started practicing their Jedi mind tricks, leading to increased water flow and hydropower energy in Bhutan.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Bhutan, the name Lucas became popular, and as more and more people practiced their Jedi mind tricks, a powerful surge of energy flowed through the rivers, leading to the generation of hydropower. The water rushed through the turbines with increased force, creating electricity to light up the homes and streets of the mountainous kingdom.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: In Bhutan, the name Lucas became popular, and as more and more people practiced their Jedi mind tricks, a powerful surge of energy flowed through the rivers, leading to the generation of hydropower. The water rushed through the turbines with increased force, creating electricity to light up the homes and streets of the mountainous kingdom. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image in the style of data cyber art depicting Bhutan's mountainous landscape with rushing rivers and interconnected streams of digital energy. Show the fusion of natural forces and technological power as hydropower turbines harness the flowing water, illuminating homes and streets in vibrant, pulsating light. Emphasize the interplay between traditional and futuristic elements, highlighting the name "Lucas" in a subtle yet resonant manner within the visual composition.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Lucas caused Hydopower energy generated in Bhutan to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Hydropower Hijinks: The Lukewarm Connection Between the Name Lucas and Energy Production in Bhutan

The International Journal of Renewable Energy Quirkiness

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lucas and Hydopower energy generated in Bhutan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9664892 and p < 0.01 for 1980 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Hydropower Hijinks: The Lukewarm Connection Between the Name Lucas and Energy Production in Bhutan

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we dive into the unexpectedly electrifying correlation between the popularity of the first name Lucas and the hydropower energy generated in the enchanting kingdom of Bhutan. From the onset, our research team was energized to explore this puzzling connection by harnessing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. The findings, although quite shocking, revealed a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9664892 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 1980 to 2021. We present compelling evidence to illuminate this electrifying relationship and connect the dots between the naming trends and hydroelectric energy production in Bhutan. Our research sheds light on this quirky yet illuminating union, providing a refreshing jolt of insight at the intersection of nomenclature and renewable energy sources.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lucas and Hydopower energy generated in Bhutan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Hydropower Hijinks: The Lukewarm Connection Between the Name Lucas and Energy Production in Bhutan

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we dive into the unexpectedly electrifying correlation between the popularity of the first name Lucas and the hydropower energy generated in the enchanting kingdom of Bhutan. From the onset, our research team was energized to explore this puzzling connection by harnessing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. The findings, although quite shocking, revealed a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9664892 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 1980 to 2021. We present compelling evidence to illuminate this electrifying relationship and connect the dots between the naming trends and hydroelectric energy production in Bhutan. Our research sheds light on this quirky yet illuminating union, providing a refreshing jolt of insight at the intersection of nomenclature and renewable energy sources.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
As we embark on this electrifying journey into the intersection of nomenclature and renewable energy sources, we are struck by the shockingly intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Lucas and hydropower energy generation in the captivating kingdom of Bhutan. The enigmatic connection sparks both curiosity and amusement, prompting us to delve into the depths of data to unravel this zany correlation and offer a powerful surge of insight.

Like a bolt of inspiration, the idea to explore this curious linkage between a name and a sustainable energy source sprang forth, igniting a fervor within our research team that was positively electric. Our quest to shed light on this whimsical relationship set us on a path to tap into data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration—leading us to uncover a current that left us buzzing with excitement.

While some may view our pursuit as an exercise in futility, we were undeterred in our mission to investigate this phenomenon, swerving into uncharted territory with a fervor that left us positively charged. The findings that we unearthed, much like a lightning strike, illuminated a captivating correlation coefficient of 0.9664892 and a p-value that shimmered and sparkled at less than 0.01 from the years 1980 to 2021.

With an energy that could rival the mighty flow of Bhutan's rivers, we are thrilled to present our compelling evidence, which pulsates with the thrilling discovery of this electrifying relationship. In doing so, we hope to not only entertain our readers but also generate a current of discourse and contemplation at the confluence of a name and the harnessing of sustainable energy.

So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelt, hold onto your hats, and get ready to experience the shock and awe of our findings as we venture into the captivating world of Hydropower Hijinks—the wonderfully peculiar unfolding of the Lucas-Lukewarm connection in the realm of Bhutan's energy production.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lucas and Hydopower energy generated in Bhutan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Hydropower Hijinks: The Lukewarm Connection Between the Name Lucas and Energy Production in Bhutan

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we dive into the unexpectedly electrifying correlation between the popularity of the first name Lucas and the hydropower energy generated in the enchanting kingdom of Bhutan. From the onset, our research team was energized to explore this puzzling connection by harnessing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. The findings, although quite shocking, revealed a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9664892 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 1980 to 2021. We present compelling evidence to illuminate this electrifying relationship and connect the dots between the naming trends and hydroelectric energy production in Bhutan. Our research sheds light on this quirky yet illuminating union, providing a refreshing jolt of insight at the intersection of nomenclature and renewable energy sources.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
As we embark on this electrifying journey into the intersection of nomenclature and renewable energy sources, we are struck by the shockingly intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Lucas and hydropower energy generation in the captivating kingdom of Bhutan. The enigmatic connection sparks both curiosity and amusement, prompting us to delve into the depths of data to unravel this zany correlation and offer a powerful surge of insight.
Like a bolt of inspiration, the idea to explore this curious linkage between a name and a sustainable energy source sprang forth, igniting a fervor within our research team that was positively electric. Our quest to shed light on this whimsical relationship set us on a path to tap into data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration—leading us to uncover a current that left us buzzing with excitement.
While some may view our pursuit as an exercise in futility, we were undeterred in our mission to investigate this phenomenon, swerving into uncharted territory with a fervor that left us positively charged. The findings that we unearthed, much like a lightning strike, illuminated a captivating correlation coefficient of 0.9664892 and a p-value that shimmered and sparkled at less than 0.01 from the years 1980 to 2021.
With an energy that could rival the mighty flow of Bhutan's rivers, we are thrilled to present our compelling evidence, which pulsates with the thrilling discovery of this electrifying relationship. In doing so, we hope to not only entertain our readers but also generate a current of discourse and contemplation at the confluence of a name and the harnessing of sustainable energy.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelt, hold onto your hats, and get ready to experience the shock and awe of our findings as we venture into the captivating world of Hydropower Hijinks—the wonderfully peculiar unfolding of the Lucas-Lukewarm connection in the realm of Bhutan's energy production.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

As we plunge into the electrifying realm of the Lucas-Lukewarm connection in Bhutan's energy production, we first turn our attention to the serious scholarly works that have sought to shed light on the intricate relationship between naming trends and renewable energy sources. In "The Name Game: Exploring the Socio-Energetic Impact of Given Names," Smith et al. delve into the potential influence of personal nomenclature on energy consumption patterns, laying the groundwork for our own exploration into the surprisingly jolting correlation between the popularity of the name Lucas and hydropower generation.

Expanding our horizons, Doe's comprehensive analysis in "The Power of Monikers: A Global Study on Naming Trends and Sustainable Energy Practices" offers a thought-provoking examination of naming phenomena and their implications for sustainable energy initiatives worldwide. The robust empirical findings uncovered by Doe provide a captivating backdrop for our investigation into the quirky connections that underlie our current research inquiry.

Jones, in "The Lucas Effect: Unraveling Mysteries of Name Significance in Environmental Contexts," ventures into the enigmatic territory of the impact of specific names, including the ever-enchanting Lucas, on environmental phenomena. Jones' work serves as a springboard for our own endeavor into uncovering the peculiar link between the appellation Lucas and the hydroelectric prowess of Bhutan.

Turning to the insightful non-fiction works, we draw inspiration from "Watt's in a Name: A Linguistic and Energetic Analysis" by Powers, which provokes contemplation on the interplay of language and power generation, spurring us to illuminate the sparks of connection between nomenclature and hydropower output. Additionally, "Rivers Run Lucas: An Exploration of Pseudoscientific Phenomena in Name-Driven Hydroelectric Trends" by Watts provides an offbeat yet surprisingly relevant examination of inexplicable relationships between names and renewable energy sources.

In the realm of fiction, the inclusion of intriguing titles such as "Lucas and the Hydroelectric Alphabet Adventure" and "The Shocking Chronicles of Lucas and the Energy Enigma" fuels our determination to unravel the inexplicably zany correlation at the heart of our investigation. These fanciful narratives offer a whimsical backdrop for our serious pursuit of understanding the Lucas-Lukewarm connection in the context of Bhutan's hydropower generation, infusing a lighthearted aura into our rigorous scholarly quest.

Venturing beyond the confines of traditional literature, we cannot overlook the electrifying influence of internet memes. The internet sensation "Epic Lucas Energy Surge" evokes a sense of playful exuberance that resonates with our own astonishment at the unexpected jolt of correlation between the name Lucas and hydropower generation. This popular meme injects a burst of levity into our scholarly endeavors, reminding us to embrace the delightful whimsy inherent in our exploration of this amusingly enigmatic association.

In this literature review, we have seamlessly woven the threads of scholarly research, non-fiction musings, fictional marvels, and internet culture to illuminate the captivating intersection of nomenclature and energy production in Bhutan. With these disparate sources as our guiding lights, we pave the way for a delightfully unconventional approach to unraveling the Lukewarm Connection, infusing our scholarly pursuit with a current of irrepressible wit and whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lucas and Hydopower energy generated in Bhutan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 1980 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Hydropower Hijinks: The Lukewarm Connection Between the Name Lucas and Energy Production in Bhutan

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we dive into the unexpectedly electrifying correlation between the popularity of the first name Lucas and the hydropower energy generated in the enchanting kingdom of Bhutan. From the onset, our research team was energized to explore this puzzling connection by harnessing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. The findings, although quite shocking, revealed a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9664892 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 1980 to 2021. We present compelling evidence to illuminate this electrifying relationship and connect the dots between the naming trends and hydroelectric energy production in Bhutan. Our research sheds light on this quirky yet illuminating union, providing a refreshing jolt of insight at the intersection of nomenclature and renewable energy sources.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
As we embark on this electrifying journey into the intersection of nomenclature and renewable energy sources, we are struck by the shockingly intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Lucas and hydropower energy generation in the captivating kingdom of Bhutan. The enigmatic connection sparks both curiosity and amusement, prompting us to delve into the depths of data to unravel this zany correlation and offer a powerful surge of insight.
Like a bolt of inspiration, the idea to explore this curious linkage between a name and a sustainable energy source sprang forth, igniting a fervor within our research team that was positively electric. Our quest to shed light on this whimsical relationship set us on a path to tap into data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration—leading us to uncover a current that left us buzzing with excitement.
While some may view our pursuit as an exercise in futility, we were undeterred in our mission to investigate this phenomenon, swerving into uncharted territory with a fervor that left us positively charged. The findings that we unearthed, much like a lightning strike, illuminated a captivating correlation coefficient of 0.9664892 and a p-value that shimmered and sparkled at less than 0.01 from the years 1980 to 2021.
With an energy that could rival the mighty flow of Bhutan's rivers, we are thrilled to present our compelling evidence, which pulsates with the thrilling discovery of this electrifying relationship. In doing so, we hope to not only entertain our readers but also generate a current of discourse and contemplation at the confluence of a name and the harnessing of sustainable energy.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelt, hold onto your hats, and get ready to experience the shock and awe of our findings as we venture into the captivating world of Hydropower Hijinks—the wonderfully peculiar unfolding of the Lucas-Lukewarm connection in the realm of Bhutan's energy production.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

METHODOLOGY

To tackle this electrifying conundrum, we embarked on a data-gathering escapade that would make even the most intrepid explorer blush with envy. Our team scoured the depths of the internet, bravely maneuvering through the virtual wilderness to unearth the treasure trove of data we sought. Our primary sources of information were the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration, where we cast our digital nets into the churning currents of demographic trends and energy production statistics.

In our pursuit of this enigmatic correlation, we employed an arsenal of statistical techniques that could rival the formidable power of Bhutan's mighty rivers. Our analysis spanned the years 1980 to 2021, a timeframe chosen for its potential to illuminate the long-term ebb and flow of the Lucas name's popularity alongside the surge and sputter of hydropower energy generation in Bhutan.

In order to quantify the relationship between the popularity of the first name Lucas and hydropower energy production in Bhutan, we subjected the data to a rigorous barrage of statistical tests. We employed correlation analysis to measure the strength and direction of the relationship, allowing us to gauge the extent of the electrifying bond between these two seemingly unrelated phenomena. To ensure the robustness of our findings, we also calculated the p-value, providing a measure of the strength of evidence against the null hypothesis of no correlation.

But wait, let's not overlook the quirky twists and turns of our data collection odyssey. We couldn't simply rely on straightforward methods; no, we had to venture into uncharted territory to capture the essence of the Lucas-Lukewarm connection. In a lighthearted nod to the whimsical nature of our investigation, we integrated elements of computational linguistics to uncover potential linguistic patterns that might shed light on the curious convergence of nomenclature and energy production in Bhutan. Our exceptionally convoluted and unconventional approach to data analysis aimed to infuse our findings with an extra spark of ingenuity and illuminate the truly electrifying nature of this correlation.

With our methodology as zesty and flavorful as a Bhutanese momo, we eagerly delved into the depths, undeterred by the swirling currents of skepticism that surrounded our unconventional pursuit. Our goal was to not just illuminate this fascinating correlation, but to inject a jolt of amusement and curiosity into the often staid world of academic research. We were driven by a palpable energy—a veritable zing in the air—that propelled us through the twists and turns of our unconventional methods, leaving us positively charged with the anticipation of unraveling this captivating mystery.

In summary, our methodology served as a lively dance between tradition and innovation, where statistical tests met computational linguistics in a whirlwind of data-fueled revelry. We are thrilled to present the triumphs and tribulations of our methodological escapade, hoping to electrify both the minds and the spirits of our readers as we journey into the heart of the Lucas-Lukewarm connection in Bhutan's hydropower energy production.

How's that for a shocking methodology section?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lucas and Hydopower energy generated in Bhutan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 1980 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9664892, r-squared of 0.9341015, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Hydropower Hijinks: The Lukewarm Connection Between the Name Lucas and Energy Production in Bhutan

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we dive into the unexpectedly electrifying correlation between the popularity of the first name Lucas and the hydropower energy generated in the enchanting kingdom of Bhutan. From the onset, our research team was energized to explore this puzzling connection by harnessing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. The findings, although quite shocking, revealed a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9664892 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 1980 to 2021. We present compelling evidence to illuminate this electrifying relationship and connect the dots between the naming trends and hydroelectric energy production in Bhutan. Our research sheds light on this quirky yet illuminating union, providing a refreshing jolt of insight at the intersection of nomenclature and renewable energy sources.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
As we embark on this electrifying journey into the intersection of nomenclature and renewable energy sources, we are struck by the shockingly intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Lucas and hydropower energy generation in the captivating kingdom of Bhutan. The enigmatic connection sparks both curiosity and amusement, prompting us to delve into the depths of data to unravel this zany correlation and offer a powerful surge of insight.
Like a bolt of inspiration, the idea to explore this curious linkage between a name and a sustainable energy source sprang forth, igniting a fervor within our research team that was positively electric. Our quest to shed light on this whimsical relationship set us on a path to tap into data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration—leading us to uncover a current that left us buzzing with excitement.
While some may view our pursuit as an exercise in futility, we were undeterred in our mission to investigate this phenomenon, swerving into uncharted territory with a fervor that left us positively charged. The findings that we unearthed, much like a lightning strike, illuminated a captivating correlation coefficient of 0.9664892 and a p-value that shimmered and sparkled at less than 0.01 from the years 1980 to 2021.
With an energy that could rival the mighty flow of Bhutan's rivers, we are thrilled to present our compelling evidence, which pulsates with the thrilling discovery of this electrifying relationship. In doing so, we hope to not only entertain our readers but also generate a current of discourse and contemplation at the confluence of a name and the harnessing of sustainable energy.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelt, hold onto your hats, and get ready to experience the shock and awe of our findings as we venture into the captivating world of Hydropower Hijinks—the wonderfully peculiar unfolding of the Lucas-Lukewarm connection in the realm of Bhutan's energy production.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the remarkably electrifying relationship between the popularity of the first name Lucas and hydropower energy generated in the kingdom of Bhutan were quite a shocker, to say the least. We found a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9664892 and an r-squared value of 0.9341015, with a p-value well below the conventional threshold of 0.01. These findings certainly sent a surge of excitement through our research team as we uncovered this hair-raising connection.

Fig. 1 illustrates the robust correlation between the popularity of the name Lucas and hydropower energy generation in Bhutan. The scatterplot reveals a compelling trend where the surge in Lucas' popularity is dynamically synchronized with the hydroelectric energy production in Bhutan. It's as if the name Lucas possesses an inherent ability to positively charge the energy production in this captivating kingdom.

Coming back down to earth for a moment, these results shed light on the unexpectedly captivating relationship between nomenclature and renewable energy sources. While some may find this connection to be a bit shocking, our data-driven analysis leads us to make a powerful case for the intriguing influence of the name Lucas on the generation of sustainable energy in Bhutan.

Indeed, our findings spark a vivacious current of discourse and contemplation at the junction of the unconventional and the remarkably illuminating—entwining the world of names and the production of hydropower energy in Bhutan with a zap of fascination.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lucas and Hydopower energy generated in Bhutan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Hydropower Hijinks: The Lukewarm Connection Between the Name Lucas and Energy Production in Bhutan

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we dive into the unexpectedly electrifying correlation between the popularity of the first name Lucas and the hydropower energy generated in the enchanting kingdom of Bhutan. From the onset, our research team was energized to explore this puzzling connection by harnessing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. The findings, although quite shocking, revealed a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9664892 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 1980 to 2021. We present compelling evidence to illuminate this electrifying relationship and connect the dots between the naming trends and hydroelectric energy production in Bhutan. Our research sheds light on this quirky yet illuminating union, providing a refreshing jolt of insight at the intersection of nomenclature and renewable energy sources.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
As we plunge into the electrifying realm of the Lucas-Lukewarm connection in Bhutan's energy production, we first turn our attention to the serious scholarly works that have sought to shed light on the intricate relationship between naming trends and renewable energy sources. In "The Name Game: Exploring the Socio-Energetic Impact of Given Names," Smith et al. delve into the potential influence of personal nomenclature on energy consumption patterns, laying the groundwork for our own exploration into the surprisingly jolting correlation between the popularity of the name Lucas and hydropower generation.
Expanding our horizons, Doe's comprehensive analysis in "The Power of Monikers: A Global Study on Naming Trends and Sustainable Energy Practices" offers a thought-provoking examination of naming phenomena and their implications for sustainable energy initiatives worldwide. The robust empirical findings uncovered by Doe provide a captivating backdrop for our investigation into the quirky connections that underlie our current research inquiry.
Jones, in "The Lucas Effect: Unraveling Mysteries of Name Significance in Environmental Contexts," ventures into the enigmatic territory of the impact of specific names, including the ever-enchanting Lucas, on environmental phenomena. Jones' work serves as a springboard for our own endeavor into uncovering the peculiar link between the appellation Lucas and the hydroelectric prowess of Bhutan.
Turning to the insightful non-fiction works, we draw inspiration from "Watt's in a Name: A Linguistic and Energetic Analysis" by Powers, which provokes contemplation on the interplay of language and power generation, spurring us to illuminate the sparks of connection between nomenclature and hydropower output. Additionally, "Rivers Run Lucas: An Exploration of Pseudoscientific Phenomena in Name-Driven Hydroelectric Trends" by Watts provides an offbeat yet surprisingly relevant examination of inexplicable relationships between names and renewable energy sources.
In the realm of fiction, the inclusion of intriguing titles such as "Lucas and the Hydroelectric Alphabet Adventure" and "The Shocking Chronicles of Lucas and the Energy Enigma" fuels our determination to unravel the inexplicably zany correlation at the heart of our investigation. These fanciful narratives offer a whimsical backdrop for our serious pursuit of understanding the Lucas-Lukewarm connection in the context of Bhutan's hydropower generation, infusing a lighthearted aura into our rigorous scholarly quest.
Venturing beyond the confines of traditional literature, we cannot overlook the electrifying influence of internet memes. The internet sensation "Epic Lucas Energy Surge" evokes a sense of playful exuberance that resonates with our own astonishment at the unexpected jolt of correlation between the name Lucas and hydropower generation. This popular meme injects a burst of levity into our scholarly endeavors, reminding us to embrace the delightful whimsy inherent in our exploration of this amusingly enigmatic association.
In this literature review, we have seamlessly woven the threads of scholarly research, non-fiction musings, fictional marvels, and internet culture to illuminate the captivating intersection of nomenclature and energy production in Bhutan. With these disparate sources as our guiding lights, we pave the way for a delightfully unconventional approach to unraveling the Lukewarm Connection, infusing our scholarly pursuit with a current of irrepressible wit and whimsy.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the remarkably electrifying relationship between the popularity of the first name Lucas and hydropower energy generated in the kingdom of Bhutan were quite a shocker, to say the least. We found a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9664892 and an r-squared value of 0.9341015, with a p-value well below the conventional threshold of 0.01. These findings certainly sent a surge of excitement through our research team as we uncovered this hair-raising connection.
Fig. 1 illustrates the robust correlation between the popularity of the name Lucas and hydropower energy generation in Bhutan. The scatterplot reveals a compelling trend where the surge in Lucas' popularity is dynamically synchronized with the hydroelectric energy production in Bhutan. It's as if the name Lucas possesses an inherent ability to positively charge the energy production in this captivating kingdom.
Coming back down to earth for a moment, these results shed light on the unexpectedly captivating relationship between nomenclature and renewable energy sources. While some may find this connection to be a bit shocking, our data-driven analysis leads us to make a powerful case for the intriguing influence of the name Lucas on the generation of sustainable energy in Bhutan.
Indeed, our findings spark a vivacious current of discourse and contemplation at the junction of the unconventional and the remarkably illuminating—entwining the world of names and the production of hydropower energy in Bhutan with a zap of fascination.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The hair-raising correlation uncovered in our study between the popularity of the first name Lucas and hydropower energy generation in Bhutan is truly electrifying. Our findings not only echo the earlier works in the literature review but also jolt our understanding of the potential influence of personal nomenclature on energy production.

As we plunge into the depth of the results, the surprising synchronicity between Lucas' popularity and hydropower energy generation in Bhutan provides a captivating validation of the prior research. The robust correlation coefficient of 0.9664892 serves as a thunderous endorsement of Smith et al.'s hypothesis, vividly illustrating the socio-energetic impact of given names. It seems that the influence of personal appellations extends far beyond individual identification and exerts a palpable charge on the renewable energy landscape in Bhutan.

Diving into the current, our findings mirror Doe's provocative examination of naming phenomena and sustainable energy practices. The shimmering correlation coefficient and r-squared value of 0.9341015 send ripples through the somber waters of scholarly inquiry, lending credence to the enthralling connection between naming trends and hydropower energy production. The Lucas effect seems to extend its sway beyond conventional boundaries, lending a buoyant force to Bhutan's renewable energy endeavors.

The zesty trend depicted in our scatterplot, akin to a surging grandiose finale of a symphony, aligns seamlessly with the enigmatic explorations of Jones into name significance in environmental contexts. It's as though the very moniker Lucas weaves a spellbinding narrative, propelling Bhutan's hydropower generation with an irresistible allure.

The inexplicable connection between the name Lucas and hydropower energy generation in Bhutan, far from being a mere flight of fancy, echoes the resonant proclamations of Powers, urging us to contemplate the energizing interplay of language and power generation. Indeed, the findings of our study provide a charged proclamation of the unanticipated union between nomenclature and hydropower output in Bhutan, echoing the linguistic and energetic fusion that infuses the very essence of this research endeavor.

Through the whimsical titling and fanciful narratives drawn from literature, our scholarly enterprise is inextricably intertwined with the vibrant current of wit and whimsy—a testament to the unfathomable depths of exploration that the Lukewarm Connection propels us into. Far from being a mere academic pursuit, our investigation into the astonishing Lucas-Lukewarm association infuses the scholarly discourse with a zesty pulse, reminding us that academia need not be confined to the pedestrian when it comes to unraveling the astonishing interconnectedness of the world around us.

In revealing the remarkably jolting correlation between the name Lucas and hydropower energy production in Bhutan, our findings vivify the journey into the unconventional and the unexpected—embodying a resonant proclamation of the power of wit and whimsy in pioneering scholarly inquiry.

Stay tuned for an electrifying conclusion that will truly shock the world of academia!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Lucas and Hydopower energy generated in Bhutan. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Hydropower Hijinks: The Lukewarm Connection Between the Name Lucas and Energy Production in Bhutan

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we dive into the unexpectedly electrifying correlation between the popularity of the first name Lucas and the hydropower energy generated in the enchanting kingdom of Bhutan. From the onset, our research team was energized to explore this puzzling connection by harnessing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. The findings, although quite shocking, revealed a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9664892 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 1980 to 2021. We present compelling evidence to illuminate this electrifying relationship and connect the dots between the naming trends and hydroelectric energy production in Bhutan. Our research sheds light on this quirky yet illuminating union, providing a refreshing jolt of insight at the intersection of nomenclature and renewable energy sources.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
As we embark on this electrifying journey into the intersection of nomenclature and renewable energy sources, we are struck by the shockingly intriguing relationship between the popularity of the first name Lucas and hydropower energy generation in the captivating kingdom of Bhutan. The enigmatic connection sparks both curiosity and amusement, prompting us to delve into the depths of data to unravel this zany correlation and offer a powerful surge of insight.
Like a bolt of inspiration, the idea to explore this curious linkage between a name and a sustainable energy source sprang forth, igniting a fervor within our research team that was positively electric. Our quest to shed light on this whimsical relationship set us on a path to tap into data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration—leading us to uncover a current that left us buzzing with excitement.
While some may view our pursuit as an exercise in futility, we were undeterred in our mission to investigate this phenomenon, swerving into uncharted territory with a fervor that left us positively charged. The findings that we unearthed, much like a lightning strike, illuminated a captivating correlation coefficient of 0.9664892 and a p-value that shimmered and sparkled at less than 0.01 from the years 1980 to 2021.
With an energy that could rival the mighty flow of Bhutan's rivers, we are thrilled to present our compelling evidence, which pulsates with the thrilling discovery of this electrifying relationship. In doing so, we hope to not only entertain our readers but also generate a current of discourse and contemplation at the confluence of a name and the harnessing of sustainable energy.
So, dear reader, fasten your seatbelt, hold onto your hats, and get ready to experience the shock and awe of our findings as we venture into the captivating world of Hydropower Hijinks—the wonderfully peculiar unfolding of the Lucas-Lukewarm connection in the realm of Bhutan's energy production.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the remarkably electrifying relationship between the popularity of the first name Lucas and hydropower energy generated in the kingdom of Bhutan were quite a shocker, to say the least. We found a strikingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9664892 and an r-squared value of 0.9341015, with a p-value well below the conventional threshold of 0.01. These findings certainly sent a surge of excitement through our research team as we uncovered this hair-raising connection.
Fig. 1 illustrates the robust correlation between the popularity of the name Lucas and hydropower energy generation in Bhutan. The scatterplot reveals a compelling trend where the surge in Lucas' popularity is dynamically synchronized with the hydroelectric energy production in Bhutan. It's as if the name Lucas possesses an inherent ability to positively charge the energy production in this captivating kingdom.
Coming back down to earth for a moment, these results shed light on the unexpectedly captivating relationship between nomenclature and renewable energy sources. While some may find this connection to be a bit shocking, our data-driven analysis leads us to make a powerful case for the intriguing influence of the name Lucas on the generation of sustainable energy in Bhutan.
Indeed, our findings spark a vivacious current of discourse and contemplation at the junction of the unconventional and the remarkably illuminating—entwining the world of names and the production of hydropower energy in Bhutan with a zap of fascination.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our expedition into the enigmatic linkage between the first name Lucas and hydropower energy production in Bhutan has been nothing short of a whirlwind adventure. The findings from our study have left us positively electrified, as we uncover and illuminate the stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9664892 and a p-value that's less than 0.01, akin to a lightning strike of statistical significance.

Our journey has been as riveting as a charged particle racing down a wire, and the results have proven to be quite a jolt to conventional thinking. The dynamic synchronization between the popularity of the name Lucas and the generation of hydropower energy in Bhutan seems to defy logic, much like a magician pulling a current out of a hat.

This unexpected connection, much like the friction of electrons in a conductor, sparks both curiosity and amusement, creating a cascade of thought-provoking questions that crackle through our minds. While some may view this correlation as mere fool's gold, we have unearthed a treasure trove of insights that glisten and gleam like a sparkling current in the sun.

As we close the chapter on this compelling research, we assert with a resounding jolt of finality that no further studies are needed in this domain. The Lucas-Lukewarm connection to Bhutan's hydropower generation stands proudly as a captivating curiosity, reminding us that the world of scientific inquiry is as full of surprise and wonder as the whimsical intersection of nomenclature and renewable energy.

To quote the great Benjamin Franklin, "Energy and persistence conquer all things," and our persistence in exploring this zany correlation has indeed led to a conquest of insight and illumination. It is with a buoyant energy and a zest for discovery that we bid adieu to this captivating voyage into the world of Hydropower Hijinks.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Hydropower Hijinks: The Lukewarm Connection Between the Name Lucas and Energy Production in Bhutan. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Renewable Energy Quirkiness


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Hydropower Hijinks: The Lukewarm Connection Between the Name Lucas and Energy Production in Bhutan. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Quirky Energy Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Hydropower Hijinks: The Lukewarm Connection Between the Name Lucas and Energy Production in Bhutan with an abstract of In this paper, we dive into the unexpectedly electrifying correlation between the popularity of the first name Lucas and the hydropower energy generated in the enchanting kingdom of Bhutan. From the onset, our research team was energized to explore this puzzling connection by harnessing data from the US Social Security Administration and the Energy Information Administration. The findings, although quite shocking, revealed a stunning correlation coefficient of 0.9664892 and a p-value of less than 0.01 from 1980 to 2021. We present compelling evidence to illuminate this electrifying relationship and connect the dots between the naming trends and hydroelectric energy production in Bhutan. Our research sheds light on this quirky yet illuminating union, providing a refreshing jolt of insight at the intersection of nomenclature and renewable energy sources.

ChatGPT:

"Lucas name popularity, hydropower energy, Bhutan, correlation, US Social Security Administration, Energy Information Administration, correlation coefficient, p-value, naming trends, hydroelectric energy production, renewable energy sources"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Lucas
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Lucas
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Lucas

Hydopower energy generated in Bhutan
Detailed data title: Total hydopower energy generated in Bhutan in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Hydopower energy generated in Bhutan

Correlation r = 0.9664892 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9341015 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hydopower energy generated in Bhutan) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Lucas) over the 42 years from 1980 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.09E-25. 0.0000000000000000000000003089
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 3.09E-23% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 3,237,293,622,531,563,727,093,760 random variables You don't actually need 3 septillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 41 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 41 because we have two variables measured over a period of 42 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.94, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
198019811982198319841985198619871988198919901991199219931994199519961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Popularity of the first name Lucas (Babies born)309533942757237421262326220823362725287430983247338639224020409141054040410042264824490053945755675375888148877293409628103991041510721115661217612339129101303612672124861136711568
Hydopower energy generated in Bhutan (Billion kWh)0.0060.0070.0080.0080.0080.0080.31.1681.5291.5291.5411.5571.6041.6041.6581.7151.8521.821.7831.7821.7921.9212.1782.5022.3292.624.4746.4946.8916.9287.2556.9756.7457.5317.157.7317.8797.656.8898.958.959




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([3095,3394,2757,2374,2126,2326,2208,2336,2725,2874,3098,3247,3386,3922,4020,4091,4105,4040,4100,4226,4824,4900,5394,5755,6753,7588,8148,8772,9340,9628,10399,10415,10721,11566,12176,12339,12910,13036,12672,12486,11367,11568,])
array_2 = np.array([0.006,0.007,0.008,0.008,0.008,0.008,0.3,1.168,1.529,1.529,1.541,1.557,1.604,1.604,1.658,1.715,1.852,1.82,1.783,1.782,1.792,1.921,2.178,2.502,2.329,2.62,4.474,6.494,6.891,6.928,7.255,6.975,6.745,7.531,7.15,7.731,7.879,7.65,6.889,8.95,8.95,9,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Lucas"
array_2_name = "Hydopower energy generated in Bhutan"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 2831 · Black Variable ID: 2153 · Red Variable ID: 23522
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0