Download png, svg
AI explanation
With fewer executive administrative assistants in South Carolina, there was a decline in the demand for professional phone-answering voices. This led to a surplus of eloquent Southern accents, which inadvertently sparked a wave of recruitment by Brazilian language schools. As more South Carolinians honed their Portuguese pronunciation, they started tuning in to Brazilian soap operas for language practice. This unexpected viewership surge drove up ad revenues for Petrobras, causing their stock price to soar. But alas, the natural ebb and flow of the telenovela market had its way, and as the fickle viewers moved on to Scandinavian dramas, Petrobras found itself in an ad revenue slump, leading to the eventual decrease in stock price. Remember, it's all fun and games in the wacky world of faux causation!Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of an office scene in South Carolina with a minimalist and futuristic look. Inside the office, there are only a few executive administrative assistants remaining, depicted in sleek, cyber-inspired attire. They are in the midst of working, with digital paperwork floating around them. The dwindling number of paper clips is symbolized by a small pile of them on a high-tech desk. In contrast, show a chaotic but visually striking scene in Brazil, with a surplus of paper clips causing a slippery mess for Petrobras. The imagery should convey the struggle and mess caused by the excess paper clips, with a digital, cyber art style. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' stock price (PBR.A). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Realistic a funny image you would see on reddit Scalar art Symbolism Data cyber art
ChatGPT: Data cyber art
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' stock price (PBR.A), in the following situation: As the number of executive administrative assistants decreased in South Carolina, there was a sharp decline in paper clip usage. This led to a surplus of paper clips in Brazil, causing a slippery situation for Petrobras. With their stock price slipping, they were really struggling to hold it all together.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a South Carolina office, the number of executive administrative assistants dwindled, leading to fewer paper clips being used. Meanwhile in Brazil, a surplus of paper clips caused a slippery mess for Petrobras. As their stock price slipped, they struggled to hold it all together.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Data cyber art ] and depicting this scene: In a South Carolina office, the number of executive administrative assistants dwindled, leading to fewer paper clips being used. Meanwhile in Brazil, a surplus of paper clips caused a slippery mess for Petrobras. As their stock price slipped, they struggled to hold it all together. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of an office scene in South Carolina with a minimalist and futuristic look. Inside the office, there are only a few executive administrative assistants remaining, depicted in sleek, cyber-inspired attire. They are in the midst of working, with digital paperwork floating around them. The dwindling number of paper clips is symbolized by a small pile of them on a high-tech desk. In contrast, show a chaotic but visually striking scene in Brazil, with a surplus of paper clips causing a slippery mess for Petrobras. The imagery should convey the struggle and mess caused by the excess paper clips, with a digital, cyber art style.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in The number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina caused Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' stock price (PBR.A) to decrease.
AI academic paper
Behind the Scenes: The Executive Administrative Assistants of South Carolina and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' Stock Performance The Journal of Administrative and Financial Analysis Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' stock price (PBR.A). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.
Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9800282 and p < 0.01 for 2010 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Behind the Scenes: The Executive Administrative Assistants of South Carolina and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' Stock Performance
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the rather peculiar relationship between the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and the stock price of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A). Our team, armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), conducted a comprehensive analysis from 2010 to 2022. To our surprise and amusement, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9800282 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a strong, statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors. We cannot help but wonder, could the secret to Petrobras' stock success lie in the bustling world of executive administrative support? Join us as we uncover this unanticipated link and ponder the implications of this unlikely correlation.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' stock price (PBR.A). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Behind the Scenes: The Executive Administrative Assistants of South Carolina and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' Stock Performance
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the rather peculiar relationship between the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and the stock price of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A). Our team, armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), conducted a comprehensive analysis from 2010 to 2022. To our surprise and amusement, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9800282 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a strong, statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors. We cannot help but wonder, could the secret to Petrobras' stock success lie in the bustling world of executive administrative support? Join us as we uncover this unanticipated link and ponder the implications of this unlikely correlation.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of finance has always been a place of intrigue and mystery, where every fluctuation in stock prices has been meticulously analyzed and scrutinized for any possible explanation. However, in the midst of this serious business, we often overlook the seemingly mundane aspects that may hold the key to unlocking the enigmatic movements of the market. Enter the world of executive administrative assistants, the unsung heroes who keep things ticking behind the scenes.
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A), a prominent player in the energy sector, has long been a subject of interest for investors and analysts. Its stock performance, like a rollercoaster ride, has left many bewildered and intrigued. On the other hand, the state of South Carolina, known for its charm and hospitality, may not immediately bring to mind the world of high finance. However, this is where our tale takes an unexpected turn.
Uniting these seemingly disparate elements, we embark on a journey to uncover the connection between the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and the stock performance of Petrobras. It is a tale where the meticulous data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) met the whimsical world of statistical analysis, resulting in a finding that is as surprising as it is entertaining.
The aim of this paper is not only to present the empirical evidence of an unforeseen correlation but also to indulge in some lighthearted contemplation. The relationship we uncovered, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9800282 and a p-value less than 0.01, has sparked intrigue and amusement among our team. We simply could not resist the temptation to unravel the underlying mechanisms and explore the potential implications of this unlikely association.
So, dear reader, buckle up as we venture into the uncharted territory of executive administrative assistants and their improbable influence on the stock market. Let us unravel this peculiar phenomenon with a blend of critical analysis and a sprinkle of wry amusement. After all, in the realm of research, no stone must be left unturned, and no humorous observation left unshared. Let the investigation commence!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' stock price (PBR.A). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Behind the Scenes: The Executive Administrative Assistants of South Carolina and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' Stock Performance
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the rather peculiar relationship between the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and the stock price of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A). Our team, armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), conducted a comprehensive analysis from 2010 to 2022. To our surprise and amusement, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9800282 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a strong, statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors. We cannot help but wonder, could the secret to Petrobras' stock success lie in the bustling world of executive administrative support? Join us as we uncover this unanticipated link and ponder the implications of this unlikely correlation.
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of finance has always been a place of intrigue and mystery, where every fluctuation in stock prices has been meticulously analyzed and scrutinized for any possible explanation. However, in the midst of this serious business, we often overlook the seemingly mundane aspects that may hold the key to unlocking the enigmatic movements of the market. Enter the world of executive administrative assistants, the unsung heroes who keep things ticking behind the scenes.
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A), a prominent player in the energy sector, has long been a subject of interest for investors and analysts. Its stock performance, like a rollercoaster ride, has left many bewildered and intrigued. On the other hand, the state of South Carolina, known for its charm and hospitality, may not immediately bring to mind the world of high finance. However, this is where our tale takes an unexpected turn.
Uniting these seemingly disparate elements, we embark on a journey to uncover the connection between the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and the stock performance of Petrobras. It is a tale where the meticulous data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) met the whimsical world of statistical analysis, resulting in a finding that is as surprising as it is entertaining.
The aim of this paper is not only to present the empirical evidence of an unforeseen correlation but also to indulge in some lighthearted contemplation. The relationship we uncovered, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9800282 and a p-value less than 0.01, has sparked intrigue and amusement among our team. We simply could not resist the temptation to unravel the underlying mechanisms and explore the potential implications of this unlikely association.
So, dear reader, buckle up as we venture into the uncharted territory of executive administrative assistants and their improbable influence on the stock market. Let us unravel this peculiar phenomenon with a blend of critical analysis and a sprinkle of wry amusement. After all, in the realm of research, no stone must be left unturned, and no humorous observation left unshared. Let the investigation commence!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Several studies have attempted to explore the intriguing interplay between seemingly unrelated factors in the financial world. Smith et al. (2015) analyzed the impact of labor force demographics on stock performance, while Doe and Jones (2019) delved into the influence of company culture on market trends. However, our research takes a delightful detour into uncharted territory by investigating the bizarre connection between the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and the stock performance of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A).
Turning to the realm of non-fiction, "The Wealth of Nations" by Adam Smith and "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offer profound insights into economic structures and unexpected correlations, albeit without the whimsical touch of our study. On the fictional side, the likes of "The Devil Wears Prada" by Lauren Weisberger and "The Assistant" by Bernard Malamud playfully fictionalize the lives of assistants, although their relevance to stock prices remains elusive.
In a serendipitous turn of events, a social media post by @StockSensei457 proclaimed, "Behind every successful stock, there's a team of administrative gems keeping things shipshape! #WallStreetWonders." This sentiment, albeit expressed in the informal vernacular of social media, captures the essence of our peculiar inquiry.
While our literature review may not be replete with conventional scholarly references, it certainly mirrors the spirit of our unconventional research. Stay tuned as we dive into the empirical findings and inject a dose of levity into the rigid world of academic discourse.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' stock price (PBR.A). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2010 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Behind the Scenes: The Executive Administrative Assistants of South Carolina and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' Stock Performance
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the rather peculiar relationship between the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and the stock price of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A). Our team, armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), conducted a comprehensive analysis from 2010 to 2022. To our surprise and amusement, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9800282 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a strong, statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors. We cannot help but wonder, could the secret to Petrobras' stock success lie in the bustling world of executive administrative support? Join us as we uncover this unanticipated link and ponder the implications of this unlikely correlation.
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of finance has always been a place of intrigue and mystery, where every fluctuation in stock prices has been meticulously analyzed and scrutinized for any possible explanation. However, in the midst of this serious business, we often overlook the seemingly mundane aspects that may hold the key to unlocking the enigmatic movements of the market. Enter the world of executive administrative assistants, the unsung heroes who keep things ticking behind the scenes.
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A), a prominent player in the energy sector, has long been a subject of interest for investors and analysts. Its stock performance, like a rollercoaster ride, has left many bewildered and intrigued. On the other hand, the state of South Carolina, known for its charm and hospitality, may not immediately bring to mind the world of high finance. However, this is where our tale takes an unexpected turn.
Uniting these seemingly disparate elements, we embark on a journey to uncover the connection between the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and the stock performance of Petrobras. It is a tale where the meticulous data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) met the whimsical world of statistical analysis, resulting in a finding that is as surprising as it is entertaining.
The aim of this paper is not only to present the empirical evidence of an unforeseen correlation but also to indulge in some lighthearted contemplation. The relationship we uncovered, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9800282 and a p-value less than 0.01, has sparked intrigue and amusement among our team. We simply could not resist the temptation to unravel the underlying mechanisms and explore the potential implications of this unlikely association.
So, dear reader, buckle up as we venture into the uncharted territory of executive administrative assistants and their improbable influence on the stock market. Let us unravel this peculiar phenomenon with a blend of critical analysis and a sprinkle of wry amusement. After all, in the realm of research, no stone must be left unturned, and no humorous observation left unshared. Let the investigation commence!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To embark on this unusual research endeavor, our team employed a blend of quantitative, qualitative, and somewhat whimsical methods. We began by sourcing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), utilizing a range of statistical and econometric techniques to explore the relationship between the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and the stock price of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A) from 2010 to 2022.
To quantify the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina, we harnessed the power of online job portals, state employment databases, and a touch of investigative flair. In the spirit of thoroughness, we cross-referenced this data with industry reports and insider information to ensure the accuracy of our findings. The whimsy of this task could not be overstated; there is something uniquely captivating about unraveling the world of administrative professionals, hidden in the midst of stock market dynamics.
In parallel, we collected daily stock price data of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A) from reliable financial databases, tracing its journey through the unpredictable terrain of financial markets. We then turned to the art of regression analysis, wielding the power of mathematical models to tease out any potential connections between the fluctuations in PBR.A stock prices and the ebb and flow of executive administrative assistance in the gentle state of South Carolina.
Our statistical toolbox overflowed with techniques such as correlation analysis, time-series modeling, and perhaps a dash of serendipity, as we sought to unravel the intricate dance between seemingly unrelated variables. The joy of discovery as we uncovered that tantalizing correlation coefficient of 0.9800282 and a p-value less than 0.01 was matched only by the amusement of contemplating the implications of this rather unexpected linkage.
In essence, we combined the analytical rigor of econometrics with a whimsical spirit of inquiry. While the methods may have been lighthearted and the journey laced with the unexpected, our commitment to empirical integrity and scholarly investigation held firm. With enthusiasm, curiosity, and perhaps the occasional raised eyebrow, we ventured forth into this unorthodox yet undeniably fascinating field of study.
As we mused on the peculiarity of our findings, a question lingered in the air: could these executive administrative assistants hold the key to unlocking the enigma of Petrobras' stock performance? This study is as much a testament to the unexpected nature of research as it is a celebration of the unanticipated pathways of discovery. Join us as we venture further into this captivating realm, where the whimsical world of administrative support intertwines with the fabric of financial markets.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' stock price (PBR.A). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .
For the time period 2010 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9800282, r-squared of 0.9604553, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Behind the Scenes: The Executive Administrative Assistants of South Carolina and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' Stock Performance
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the rather peculiar relationship between the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and the stock price of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A). Our team, armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), conducted a comprehensive analysis from 2010 to 2022. To our surprise and amusement, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9800282 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a strong, statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors. We cannot help but wonder, could the secret to Petrobras' stock success lie in the bustling world of executive administrative support? Join us as we uncover this unanticipated link and ponder the implications of this unlikely correlation.
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of finance has always been a place of intrigue and mystery, where every fluctuation in stock prices has been meticulously analyzed and scrutinized for any possible explanation. However, in the midst of this serious business, we often overlook the seemingly mundane aspects that may hold the key to unlocking the enigmatic movements of the market. Enter the world of executive administrative assistants, the unsung heroes who keep things ticking behind the scenes.
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A), a prominent player in the energy sector, has long been a subject of interest for investors and analysts. Its stock performance, like a rollercoaster ride, has left many bewildered and intrigued. On the other hand, the state of South Carolina, known for its charm and hospitality, may not immediately bring to mind the world of high finance. However, this is where our tale takes an unexpected turn.
Uniting these seemingly disparate elements, we embark on a journey to uncover the connection between the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and the stock performance of Petrobras. It is a tale where the meticulous data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) met the whimsical world of statistical analysis, resulting in a finding that is as surprising as it is entertaining.
The aim of this paper is not only to present the empirical evidence of an unforeseen correlation but also to indulge in some lighthearted contemplation. The relationship we uncovered, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9800282 and a p-value less than 0.01, has sparked intrigue and amusement among our team. We simply could not resist the temptation to unravel the underlying mechanisms and explore the potential implications of this unlikely association.
So, dear reader, buckle up as we venture into the uncharted territory of executive administrative assistants and their improbable influence on the stock market. Let us unravel this peculiar phenomenon with a blend of critical analysis and a sprinkle of wry amusement. After all, in the realm of research, no stone must be left unturned, and no humorous observation left unshared. Let the investigation commence!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation between the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and the stock price of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A) from 2010 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9800282 suggests a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated factors. This finding was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9604553, indicating that a whopping 96.05% of the variability in PBR.A stock price can be explained by the number of executive administrative assistants in the Palmetto State. To add to the excitement, the p-value was less than 0.01, underscoring the statistical significance of this unexpected association. It seems that the world of finance can indeed be full of surprises, much like a game of stock market roulette, but with executive administrative assistants as the unexpected lucky charm.
Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the robust correlation between the aforementioned variables. The plot showcases a clear, upward trend, reminiscent of a thrilling rollercoaster ride in the world of statistical analysis. As the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina increases, the stock price of Petrobras seems to climb along with it, leading us to wonder if these unsung heroes of the workplace are secretly pulling the strings of the financial market.
While we must approach these results with the requisite skepticism and academic rigor, it would be remiss not to appreciate the blend of curiosity and whimsy that emerged from this peculiar study. The surprising relationship between these two unrelated entities invites us to ponder unforeseen influences that may shape the ever-fluctuating world of stock prices. Perhaps there is a lesson to be learned from this unanticipated correlation – that sometimes, in the complex web of financial markets, the most unexpected factors may hold the key to unraveling the mysteries of stock performance.
Our team finds great amusement in the discovery of this unlikely connection, and we hope this study sparks similar delight and contemplation among our esteemed colleagues and readers. After all, in the realm of research and analysis, even the most unusual pairings can provide valuable insights and unexpected moments of humor. So, shall we embrace the merry dance of numerical relationships and improbable correlations, and revel in the playful surprises hidden within the world of data analysis? We certainly think so!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' stock price (PBR.A). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
Behind the Scenes: The Executive Administrative Assistants of South Carolina and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' Stock Performance
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the rather peculiar relationship between the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and the stock price of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A). Our team, armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), conducted a comprehensive analysis from 2010 to 2022. To our surprise and amusement, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9800282 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a strong, statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors. We cannot help but wonder, could the secret to Petrobras' stock success lie in the bustling world of executive administrative support? Join us as we uncover this unanticipated link and ponder the implications of this unlikely correlation.
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Several studies have attempted to explore the intriguing interplay between seemingly unrelated factors in the financial world. Smith et al. (2015) analyzed the impact of labor force demographics on stock performance, while Doe and Jones (2019) delved into the influence of company culture on market trends. However, our research takes a delightful detour into uncharted territory by investigating the bizarre connection between the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and the stock performance of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A).
Turning to the realm of non-fiction, "The Wealth of Nations" by Adam Smith and "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner offer profound insights into economic structures and unexpected correlations, albeit without the whimsical touch of our study. On the fictional side, the likes of "The Devil Wears Prada" by Lauren Weisberger and "The Assistant" by Bernard Malamud playfully fictionalize the lives of assistants, although their relevance to stock prices remains elusive.
In a serendipitous turn of events, a social media post by @StockSensei457 proclaimed, "Behind every successful stock, there's a team of administrative gems keeping things shipshape! #WallStreetWonders." This sentiment, albeit expressed in the informal vernacular of social media, captures the essence of our peculiar inquiry.
While our literature review may not be replete with conventional scholarly references, it certainly mirrors the spirit of our unconventional research. Stay tuned as we dive into the empirical findings and inject a dose of levity into the rigid world of academic discourse.
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation between the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and the stock price of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A) from 2010 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9800282 suggests a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated factors. This finding was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9604553, indicating that a whopping 96.05% of the variability in PBR.A stock price can be explained by the number of executive administrative assistants in the Palmetto State. To add to the excitement, the p-value was less than 0.01, underscoring the statistical significance of this unexpected association. It seems that the world of finance can indeed be full of surprises, much like a game of stock market roulette, but with executive administrative assistants as the unexpected lucky charm.
Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the robust correlation between the aforementioned variables. The plot showcases a clear, upward trend, reminiscent of a thrilling rollercoaster ride in the world of statistical analysis. As the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina increases, the stock price of Petrobras seems to climb along with it, leading us to wonder if these unsung heroes of the workplace are secretly pulling the strings of the financial market.
While we must approach these results with the requisite skepticism and academic rigor, it would be remiss not to appreciate the blend of curiosity and whimsy that emerged from this peculiar study. The surprising relationship between these two unrelated entities invites us to ponder unforeseen influences that may shape the ever-fluctuating world of stock prices. Perhaps there is a lesson to be learned from this unanticipated correlation – that sometimes, in the complex web of financial markets, the most unexpected factors may hold the key to unraveling the mysteries of stock performance.
Our team finds great amusement in the discovery of this unlikely connection, and we hope this study sparks similar delight and contemplation among our esteemed colleagues and readers. After all, in the realm of research and analysis, even the most unusual pairings can provide valuable insights and unexpected moments of humor. So, shall we embrace the merry dance of numerical relationships and improbable correlations, and revel in the playful surprises hidden within the world of data analysis? We certainly think so!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The illuminating results of our study have left us both astonished and bemused. Who would have thought that the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina could wield such a significant influence on the stock price of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A)? As Adam Smith contemplated the invisible hand guiding market forces, could it be that behind this invisible hand, there are a multitude of administrative hands deftly maneuvering the stock price rollercoaster?
Our findings not only support the prior research by Smith et al. (2015) and Doe and Jones (2019), but they also add an unexpected twist to the ongoing saga of investigating obscure correlations. It seems that the influence of labor force demographics on stock performance is not confined to conventional observations, for the administrative gems of South Carolina have quietly emerged as unsung heroes in the realm of market dynamics.
Returning to the serendipitous social media post by @StockSensei457, it appears there may be more truth to the witticism than meets the eye. Could it be that behind every successful stock, there is indeed a team of administrative marvels keeping things shipshape, as suggested by the jocular tweet? Our study seems to endorse this notion, albeit in a significantly more rigorous and statistically robust manner.
In light of the substantial correlation coefficient of 0.9800282 and the r-squared value of 0.9604553, it becomes evident that the bustling world of administrative support in South Carolina is not to be underestimated when it comes to its impact on Petrobras' stock price. This revelation beckons us to rethink the classic adage "behind every great man, there's a great woman" by amending it to "behind every thriving stock, there's a bustling team of executive administrative assistants."
While acknowledging the humorous appeal of our findings, we extend a cautionary note that our study does not imply a cause-and-effect relationship between the number of executive administrative assistants and Petrobras' stock performance. Rather, it sheds light on a fascinating and unexpected statistical association that provokes further contemplation and inquiry.
With a wink to the whimsical universe of statistical analysis, we invite our esteemed colleagues and readers to join us in embracing the delightful intersection of numerical relationships and improbable correlations. Who knows what other delightful surprises and comic revelations await us in the uncharted territories of finance and economics? We eagerly anticipate the unfolding of these intellectual capers and remain ever attentive to the unlikely influences that shape the enigmatic world of stock performance.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' stock price (PBR.A). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Behind the Scenes: The Executive Administrative Assistants of South Carolina and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' Stock Performance
[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we delve into the rather peculiar relationship between the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and the stock price of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A). Our team, armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), conducted a comprehensive analysis from 2010 to 2022. To our surprise and amusement, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9800282 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a strong, statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors. We cannot help but wonder, could the secret to Petrobras' stock success lie in the bustling world of executive administrative support? Join us as we uncover this unanticipated link and ponder the implications of this unlikely correlation.
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of finance has always been a place of intrigue and mystery, where every fluctuation in stock prices has been meticulously analyzed and scrutinized for any possible explanation. However, in the midst of this serious business, we often overlook the seemingly mundane aspects that may hold the key to unlocking the enigmatic movements of the market. Enter the world of executive administrative assistants, the unsung heroes who keep things ticking behind the scenes.
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A), a prominent player in the energy sector, has long been a subject of interest for investors and analysts. Its stock performance, like a rollercoaster ride, has left many bewildered and intrigued. On the other hand, the state of South Carolina, known for its charm and hospitality, may not immediately bring to mind the world of high finance. However, this is where our tale takes an unexpected turn.
Uniting these seemingly disparate elements, we embark on a journey to uncover the connection between the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and the stock performance of Petrobras. It is a tale where the meticulous data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) met the whimsical world of statistical analysis, resulting in a finding that is as surprising as it is entertaining.
The aim of this paper is not only to present the empirical evidence of an unforeseen correlation but also to indulge in some lighthearted contemplation. The relationship we uncovered, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9800282 and a p-value less than 0.01, has sparked intrigue and amusement among our team. We simply could not resist the temptation to unravel the underlying mechanisms and explore the potential implications of this unlikely association.
So, dear reader, buckle up as we venture into the uncharted territory of executive administrative assistants and their improbable influence on the stock market. Let us unravel this peculiar phenomenon with a blend of critical analysis and a sprinkle of wry amusement. After all, in the realm of research, no stone must be left unturned, and no humorous observation left unshared. Let the investigation commence!
[[RESULTS]]
Our analysis revealed a remarkable correlation between the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and the stock price of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A) from 2010 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9800282 suggests a strong positive relationship between these two seemingly unrelated factors. This finding was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.9604553, indicating that a whopping 96.05% of the variability in PBR.A stock price can be explained by the number of executive administrative assistants in the Palmetto State. To add to the excitement, the p-value was less than 0.01, underscoring the statistical significance of this unexpected association. It seems that the world of finance can indeed be full of surprises, much like a game of stock market roulette, but with executive administrative assistants as the unexpected lucky charm.
Figure 1 depicts a scatterplot that vividly illustrates the robust correlation between the aforementioned variables. The plot showcases a clear, upward trend, reminiscent of a thrilling rollercoaster ride in the world of statistical analysis. As the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina increases, the stock price of Petrobras seems to climb along with it, leading us to wonder if these unsung heroes of the workplace are secretly pulling the strings of the financial market.
While we must approach these results with the requisite skepticism and academic rigor, it would be remiss not to appreciate the blend of curiosity and whimsy that emerged from this peculiar study. The surprising relationship between these two unrelated entities invites us to ponder unforeseen influences that may shape the ever-fluctuating world of stock prices. Perhaps there is a lesson to be learned from this unanticipated correlation – that sometimes, in the complex web of financial markets, the most unexpected factors may hold the key to unraveling the mysteries of stock performance.
Our team finds great amusement in the discovery of this unlikely connection, and we hope this study sparks similar delight and contemplation among our esteemed colleagues and readers. After all, in the realm of research and analysis, even the most unusual pairings can provide valuable insights and unexpected moments of humor. So, shall we embrace the merry dance of numerical relationships and improbable correlations, and revel in the playful surprises hidden within the world of data analysis? We certainly think so!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In conclusion, our study has unearthed a rather unexpected association between the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and the stock performance of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A). With a correlation coefficient of 0.9800282 and a p-value less than 0.01, it's safe to say that the relationship is as strong as a double espresso. The mere thought of these administrative superheroes silently influencing the stock market brings a whole new meaning to the phrase "behind the scenes."
While the findings of our research may defy conventional wisdom, they also serve as a delightful reminder that the world of finance is not always as serious as a heart attack. It seems that even in the domain of stock prices and market fluctuations, there's room for a splash of quirkiness and a dash of whimsy. After all, who would have thought that the bustling world of administrative support could hold the secret to stock market success? It's almost as if we've stumbled upon a hidden treasure map in a filing cabinet.
We've thoroughly enjoyed uncovering this unlikely correlation and pondering the whimsical implications it holds. It's a peculiar journey that has left us with a sense of wonder and a generous portion of amusement. However, like a good joke, all good things must come to an end, and we assert that no further research is needed in this area. Let's leave this quirky connection between administrative assistants and stock prices to tickle our funny bones and baffle our minds as we forge ahead into the uncharted territories of financial analysis. After all, sometimes the most surprising revelations are the ones we stumble upon in the most unexpected places.
In the words of the great Bard, "All the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players, but behind every successful stock, there may just be a team of administrative marvels orchestrating the show."
And with that, we bid adieu to this unlikely partnership, leaving it to tantalize the imaginations of future researchers and traders alike.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Behind the Scenes: The Executive Administrative Assistants of South Carolina and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' Stock Performance. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Journal of Administrative and Financial Analysis
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Behind the Scenes: The Executive Administrative Assistants of South Carolina and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' Stock Performance. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The Society for Administrative Professionals and International Business Performance Analysis
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Behind the Scenes: The Executive Administrative Assistants of South Carolina and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' Stock Performance with an abstract of In this research paper, we delve into the rather peculiar relationship between the number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina and the stock price of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A). Our team, armed with data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), conducted a comprehensive analysis from 2010 to 2022. To our surprise and amusement, we discovered a correlation coefficient of 0.9800282 and a p-value less than 0.01, indicating a strong, statistically significant relationship between these seemingly unrelated factors. We cannot help but wonder, could the secret to Petrobras' stock success lie in the bustling world of executive administrative support? Join us as we uncover this unanticipated link and ponder the implications of this unlikely correlation.
ChatGPT:
executive administrative assistants, South Carolina, Petrobras stock performance, correlation coefficient, p-value, relationship analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics data, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, unanticipated correlation, implications of correlation
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
The number of executive administrative assistants in South CarolinaDetailed data title: BLS estimate of executive secretaries and executive administrative assistants in South Carolina
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' stock price (PBR.A)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras (PBR.A) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
See what else correlates with Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' stock price (PBR.A)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.9604553 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 96% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' stock price (PBR.A)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina) over the 13 years from 2010 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.6E-9. 0.0000000046001152071744110000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.98 in 4.6E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 217,385,860 random variables You don't actually need 217 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 12 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 12 because we have two variables measured over a period of 13 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.93, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
The number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina (Laborers) | 10360 | 8540 | 7320 | 5840 | 5240 | 4380 | 4070 | 4100 | 3990 | 4370 | 5200 | 4660 | 5130 |
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' stock price (PBR.A) (Stock price) | 43.5 | 33.65 | 23.99 | 19.68 | 14.24 | 7.21 | 3.39 | 9.31 | 9.99 | 11.79 | 15.06 | 11.27 | 10.18 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is. - Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves.
Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([10360,8540,7320,5840,5240,4380,4070,4100,3990,4370,5200,4660,5130,])
array_2 = np.array([43.5,33.65,23.99,19.68,14.24,7.21,3.39,9.31,9.99,11.79,15.06,11.27,10.18,])
array_1_name = "The number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina"
array_2_name = "Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' stock price (PBR.A)"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only The number of executive administrative assistants in South Carolina
- Line chart for only Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' stock price (PBR.A)
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: Behind the Scenes: The Executive Administrative Assistants of South Carolina and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. - Petrobras' Stock Performance
Your rating skills are top-notch!
Correlation ID: 2818 · Black Variable ID: 18596 · Red Variable ID: 1643