about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,806 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in cotton in Texas and the second variable is Google searches for 'i cant even'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

It caused a lot of unpicking and rethreading, leaving people in a real fabric of frustration. The GMO cotton just couldn't be hemmed in, leading to a tangled web of exasperation. It seems like the situation has been sewn up, but these cotton-pickin' GMOs have really spun things out of control. It's a real textile dilemma, leaving everyone in stitches and unable to weave their way out of the confusion!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie, in a vast Texas cotton field, rows of genetically modified cotton plants sway gently in the breeze. The fluffy, soft fibers of the cotton are so incredibly fine that a group of frustrated millennials stand amidst the plants, their exasperated faces turned upward. Meanwhile, in the distance, a giant screen displays a surge in Google searches for "i cant even" as the millennials take to their phones to express their intense frustration with the cotton's softness. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in cotton in Texas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Brutalism Symbolism Steampunk Woodblock painting An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in cotton in Texas and Google searches for 'i cant even', in the following situation: As GMO cotton crops in Texas grew, the fibers became so soft that they caused intense frustration among millennials. They couldn't handle the softness and exclaimed, "I can't even!" leading to a surge in Google searches for the phrase.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast Texas cotton field, rows of genetically modified cotton plants sway gently in the breeze. The fluffy, soft fibers of the cotton are so incredibly fine that a group of frustrated millennials stand amidst the plants, their exasperated faces turned upward as they exclaim, "I can't even!" Meanwhile, in the distance, a giant screen displays a surge in Google searches for "i cant even" as the millennials take to their phones to express their intense frustration with the cotton's softness.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie ] and depicting this scene: In a vast Texas cotton field, rows of genetically modified cotton plants sway gently in the breeze. The fluffy, soft fibers of the cotton are so incredibly fine that a group of frustrated millennials stand amidst the plants, their exasperated faces turned upward as they exclaim, "I can't even!" Meanwhile, in the distance, a giant screen displays a surge in Google searches for "i cant even" as the millennials take to their phones to express their intense frustration with the cotton's softness. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie, in a vast Texas cotton field, rows of genetically modified cotton plants sway gently in the breeze. The fluffy, soft fibers of the cotton are so incredibly fine that a group of frustrated millennials stand amidst the plants, their exasperated faces turned upward. Meanwhile, in the distance, a giant screen displays a surge in Google searches for "i cant even" as the millennials take to their phones to express their intense frustration with the cotton's softness.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in cotton in Texas caused i cant even (Google searches for 'i cant even') to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
From Cotton Picking to Web Browsing: The Can't Even Correlation

The Journal of Quirky Quandaries

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9072241 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
From Cotton Picking to Web Browsing: The "Can't Even" Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unlikely correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i can't even". While it may seem as unrelated as apples and oranges, our research reveals a surprising connection between the two. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9072241, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2022. The results challenge conventional wisdom and prompt us to ponder how cultivating GMO cotton has influenced the collective exasperation of internet users. Join us as we embark on this adventure through the cotton fields of Texas and the vast digital landscape of "can't even" expressions. Let's see if we can "thread" the needle between agricultural innovation and internet culture.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Cotton Picking to Web Browsing: The "Can't Even" Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unlikely correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i can't even". While it may seem as unrelated as apples and oranges, our research reveals a surprising connection between the two. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9072241, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2022. The results challenge conventional wisdom and prompt us to ponder how cultivating GMO cotton has influenced the collective exasperation of internet users. Join us as we embark on this adventure through the cotton fields of Texas and the vast digital landscape of "can't even" expressions. Let's see if we can "thread" the needle between agricultural innovation and internet culture.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Ladies and gentlemen, and esteemed colleagues, welcome to the whimsical world of agricultural and internet intersection! Today, we embark on a riveting journey through the labyrinth of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the often perplexing realm of internet vernacular, seeking to unravel the enigma behind the "Can't Even" correlation.

As our title suggests, we are delving into uncharted territories that may seem as mismatched as socks on a Monday morning, yet rest assured, our findings will leave you astonished, bemused, and quite possibly contemplating a career switch to cotton farming. The evident connection between GMO cotton and the "i can't even" phenomenon will have you questioning the very fabric of our digital society.

While we won't be picking cotton or typing code, we will be navigating through the fields of data, meticulously sifting through the fiber of USDA records and the interconnected web of Google searches. Our mission: to uncover if GMO cotton adoption can truly sow the seeds of frustration among internet denizens, leading them to collectively exclaim, "I can't even!"

So, fasten your seatbelts, adjust your spectacles, and let’s dive into this groundbreaking research, where we thread the needle between agricultural innovation and internet culture. Get ready to be cotton-pickin' amazed!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Cotton Picking to Web Browsing: The "Can't Even" Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unlikely correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i can't even". While it may seem as unrelated as apples and oranges, our research reveals a surprising connection between the two. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9072241, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2022. The results challenge conventional wisdom and prompt us to ponder how cultivating GMO cotton has influenced the collective exasperation of internet users. Join us as we embark on this adventure through the cotton fields of Texas and the vast digital landscape of "can't even" expressions. Let's see if we can "thread" the needle between agricultural innovation and internet culture.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, and esteemed colleagues, welcome to the whimsical world of agricultural and internet intersection! Today, we embark on a riveting journey through the labyrinth of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the often perplexing realm of internet vernacular, seeking to unravel the enigma behind the "Can't Even" correlation.
As our title suggests, we are delving into uncharted territories that may seem as mismatched as socks on a Monday morning, yet rest assured, our findings will leave you astonished, bemused, and quite possibly contemplating a career switch to cotton farming. The evident connection between GMO cotton and the "i can't even" phenomenon will have you questioning the very fabric of our digital society.
While we won't be picking cotton or typing code, we will be navigating through the fields of data, meticulously sifting through the fiber of USDA records and the interconnected web of Google searches. Our mission: to uncover if GMO cotton adoption can truly sow the seeds of frustration among internet denizens, leading them to collectively exclaim, "I can't even!"
So, fasten your seatbelts, adjust your spectacles, and let’s dive into this groundbreaking research, where we thread the needle between agricultural innovation and internet culture. Get ready to be cotton-pickin' amazed!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between GMO cotton cultivation and the prevalence of "i can't even" search queries on Google has been a topic of increasing interest in recent years. Smith et al. (2017) delved into the agricultural aspect, analyzing the impact of GMO adoption on cotton yields and pest resistance. They found significant improvements in crop productivity and related it to the increased use of genetically engineered varieties. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2019) explored internet language trends, examining the evolution of expressions such as "i can't even" in the digital sphere, attributing it to the complexities of modern-day life.

Despite the seemingly disparate nature of these fields, the convergence of plant genetics and internet linguistics has garnered attention from an eclectic array of sources. In "The Cotton Wars" by A. Farmer, a comprehensive examination of the cotton industry sheds light on the historical context and the advent of GMO technologies. Similarly, "Internet Linguistics: A Digital Discourse Analysis" by L. Chatsumpersan offers insights into the intricacies of online communication, including the emergence of popular phrases like "i can't even."

On a more whimsical note, fictional narratives have also touched upon the subject, albeit in a less scholarly manner. In "The Cotton Connection" by A. Novelist, the protagonist stumbles upon a mysterious correlation between their cotton farm's GMO usage and the absurdity of internet memes, leading to unforeseen consequences. Similarly, "The Cyber Chronicles" by S. Storyteller weaves a tale of digital escapades, where characters find themselves embroiled in a web of GMO intrigue and "i can't even" shenanigans.

Speaking of internet culture, the notorious Grumpy Cat meme has long epitomized the sentiment of exasperation, akin to the "i can't even" phenomenon. With furrowed brows and a perpetual scowl, Grumpy Cat has become the face of online discontent, offering a unique perspective on the human inclination to express frustration in a myriad of ways.

As we navigate through this amalgamation of scholarly work, fiction, and internet lore, it becomes apparent that the relationship between GMO cotton adoption and "i can't even" expressions is as convoluted as a tangled ball of yarn. Yet, as we unwind the threads of this peculiar connection, we embroider a narrative that intertwines the agricultural landscape with the digital tapestry of societal exasperation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Cotton Picking to Web Browsing: The "Can't Even" Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unlikely correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i can't even". While it may seem as unrelated as apples and oranges, our research reveals a surprising connection between the two. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9072241, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2022. The results challenge conventional wisdom and prompt us to ponder how cultivating GMO cotton has influenced the collective exasperation of internet users. Join us as we embark on this adventure through the cotton fields of Texas and the vast digital landscape of "can't even" expressions. Let's see if we can "thread" the needle between agricultural innovation and internet culture.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, and esteemed colleagues, welcome to the whimsical world of agricultural and internet intersection! Today, we embark on a riveting journey through the labyrinth of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the often perplexing realm of internet vernacular, seeking to unravel the enigma behind the "Can't Even" correlation.
As our title suggests, we are delving into uncharted territories that may seem as mismatched as socks on a Monday morning, yet rest assured, our findings will leave you astonished, bemused, and quite possibly contemplating a career switch to cotton farming. The evident connection between GMO cotton and the "i can't even" phenomenon will have you questioning the very fabric of our digital society.
While we won't be picking cotton or typing code, we will be navigating through the fields of data, meticulously sifting through the fiber of USDA records and the interconnected web of Google searches. Our mission: to uncover if GMO cotton adoption can truly sow the seeds of frustration among internet denizens, leading them to collectively exclaim, "I can't even!"
So, fasten your seatbelts, adjust your spectacles, and let’s dive into this groundbreaking research, where we thread the needle between agricultural innovation and internet culture. Get ready to be cotton-pickin' amazed!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To begin our cotton-pickin' adventure, we first had to collect and analyze data from the hallowed fields of agricultural statistics and the labyrinthine expanse of internet searches. Our esteemed team of data wranglers scoured through the vast archives of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) to obtain comprehensive records of GMO cotton adoption in the state of Texas from 2004 to 2022. Imagine a digital treasure hunt, except our bounty was not gold or jewels, but rather rows and rows of data on cotton cultivation.

Once we had our hands on this agricultural goldmine, we turned our gaze toward the digital domain, embarking on a quest through the virtual forests of Google Trends. With our minds sharpened like the blades of a John Deere harvester, we meticulously harvested data on the frequency of searches for the phrase "i can't even" from the same period. It was akin to navigating through a jungle of digital memes and language quirks, seeking patterns and correlations as elusive as a needle in a haystack.

With our raw data in hand, we set out to clean and preprocess it, akin to separating the cotton from its seeds, removing any outliers or noise that could potentially taint our analysis. Much like skilled cotton pickers, we carefully sieved through the data, ensuring that only the finest strands of information were retained for our examination.

Next, we implemented the intricate art of statistical analysis, using sophisticated techniques to unearth patterns and connections that were as intricate as a spider's web. We calculated a Pearson correlation coefficient between the adoption of GMOs in cotton cultivation in Texas and the frequency of "i can't even" searches, revealing a surprising and robust correlation of 0.9072241. This coefficient stood as tall as the lofty cotton plants themselves, firmly asserting the unexpected relationship we had uncovered.

Our statistical journey culminated in the application of a hypothesis test, where we scrutinized the p-value with the rigor of a discerning cotton buyer examining the quality of the crop. To our astonishment, the p-value emerged as less than 0.01, signifying a statistically significant relationship between GMO cotton adoption and the exasperated cries of "i can't even" echoing across the digital landscape.

Finally, in the spirit of transparency and integrity, we subjected our analysis to peer review – a process akin to placing our findings under the scrutinizing gaze of the agricultural and digital communities, much like presenting our cotton crop at a county fair for appraisal. With our methodologies thoroughly vetted and validated, we can proudly present our findings to the world, ready to seed a new era of inquiry into the unexpected intersections between agriculture and internet culture.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9072241, r-squared of 0.8230556, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
From Cotton Picking to Web Browsing: The "Can't Even" Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unlikely correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i can't even". While it may seem as unrelated as apples and oranges, our research reveals a surprising connection between the two. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9072241, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2022. The results challenge conventional wisdom and prompt us to ponder how cultivating GMO cotton has influenced the collective exasperation of internet users. Join us as we embark on this adventure through the cotton fields of Texas and the vast digital landscape of "can't even" expressions. Let's see if we can "thread" the needle between agricultural innovation and internet culture.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ladies and gentlemen, and esteemed colleagues, welcome to the whimsical world of agricultural and internet intersection! Today, we embark on a riveting journey through the labyrinth of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the often perplexing realm of internet vernacular, seeking to unravel the enigma behind the "Can't Even" correlation.
As our title suggests, we are delving into uncharted territories that may seem as mismatched as socks on a Monday morning, yet rest assured, our findings will leave you astonished, bemused, and quite possibly contemplating a career switch to cotton farming. The evident connection between GMO cotton and the "i can't even" phenomenon will have you questioning the very fabric of our digital society.
While we won't be picking cotton or typing code, we will be navigating through the fields of data, meticulously sifting through the fiber of USDA records and the interconnected web of Google searches. Our mission: to uncover if GMO cotton adoption can truly sow the seeds of frustration among internet denizens, leading them to collectively exclaim, "I can't even!"
So, fasten your seatbelts, adjust your spectacles, and let’s dive into this groundbreaking research, where we thread the needle between agricultural innovation and internet culture. Get ready to be cotton-pickin' amazed!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our research revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9072241 between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i can't even". This positively bewildering correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8230556 and a p-value of less than 0.01, leaving us scratching our heads as we ponder the quirky interconnectedness of agricultural practices and internet exasperation.

In Figure 1, we present a scatterplot showcasing the unmistakable connection between these seemingly incongruous variables. The data points elegantly dance across the plot, revealing a strong linear relationship that defies logic and challenges traditional thinking. Take a moment to appreciate the irony of how GMO cotton, cultivated amid the vast Texan landscapes, appears to invoke a collective state of exasperation in the digital domain.

Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also open a Pandora's box of contemplation about the subtle influence of agricultural innovations on modern language and expressions. It seems that the threads of GMO cotton cultivation have woven their way into the very fabric of internet culture, resulting in an unexpected tapestry of "can't even" sentiments.

This captivating correlation between GMO cotton and "i can't even" searches invites us to explore the uncharted territories of interdisciplinary connections, reminding us that in the world of research, sometimes the most unexpected pairings lead to the most intriguing discoveries. So, let us embrace this revelation with a sense of wonder and amazement, as we continue to untangle the complex web of human behavior and technological advancements.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
From Cotton Picking to Web Browsing: The "Can't Even" Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unlikely correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i can't even". While it may seem as unrelated as apples and oranges, our research reveals a surprising connection between the two. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9072241, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2022. The results challenge conventional wisdom and prompt us to ponder how cultivating GMO cotton has influenced the collective exasperation of internet users. Join us as we embark on this adventure through the cotton fields of Texas and the vast digital landscape of "can't even" expressions. Let's see if we can "thread" the needle between agricultural innovation and internet culture.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between GMO cotton cultivation and the prevalence of "i can't even" search queries on Google has been a topic of increasing interest in recent years. Smith et al. (2017) delved into the agricultural aspect, analyzing the impact of GMO adoption on cotton yields and pest resistance. They found significant improvements in crop productivity and related it to the increased use of genetically engineered varieties. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2019) explored internet language trends, examining the evolution of expressions such as "i can't even" in the digital sphere, attributing it to the complexities of modern-day life.
Despite the seemingly disparate nature of these fields, the convergence of plant genetics and internet linguistics has garnered attention from an eclectic array of sources. In "The Cotton Wars" by A. Farmer, a comprehensive examination of the cotton industry sheds light on the historical context and the advent of GMO technologies. Similarly, "Internet Linguistics: A Digital Discourse Analysis" by L. Chatsumpersan offers insights into the intricacies of online communication, including the emergence of popular phrases like "i can't even."
On a more whimsical note, fictional narratives have also touched upon the subject, albeit in a less scholarly manner. In "The Cotton Connection" by A. Novelist, the protagonist stumbles upon a mysterious correlation between their cotton farm's GMO usage and the absurdity of internet memes, leading to unforeseen consequences. Similarly, "The Cyber Chronicles" by S. Storyteller weaves a tale of digital escapades, where characters find themselves embroiled in a web of GMO intrigue and "i can't even" shenanigans.
Speaking of internet culture, the notorious Grumpy Cat meme has long epitomized the sentiment of exasperation, akin to the "i can't even" phenomenon. With furrowed brows and a perpetual scowl, Grumpy Cat has become the face of online discontent, offering a unique perspective on the human inclination to express frustration in a myriad of ways.
As we navigate through this amalgamation of scholarly work, fiction, and internet lore, it becomes apparent that the relationship between GMO cotton adoption and "i can't even" expressions is as convoluted as a tangled ball of yarn. Yet, as we unwind the threads of this peculiar connection, we embroider a narrative that intertwines the agricultural landscape with the digital tapestry of societal exasperation.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our research revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9072241 between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i can't even". This positively bewildering correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8230556 and a p-value of less than 0.01, leaving us scratching our heads as we ponder the quirky interconnectedness of agricultural practices and internet exasperation.
In Figure 1, we present a scatterplot showcasing the unmistakable connection between these seemingly incongruous variables. The data points elegantly dance across the plot, revealing a strong linear relationship that defies logic and challenges traditional thinking. Take a moment to appreciate the irony of how GMO cotton, cultivated amid the vast Texan landscapes, appears to invoke a collective state of exasperation in the digital domain.
Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also open a Pandora's box of contemplation about the subtle influence of agricultural innovations on modern language and expressions. It seems that the threads of GMO cotton cultivation have woven their way into the very fabric of internet culture, resulting in an unexpected tapestry of "can't even" sentiments.
This captivating correlation between GMO cotton and "i can't even" searches invites us to explore the uncharted territories of interdisciplinary connections, reminding us that in the world of research, sometimes the most unexpected pairings lead to the most intriguing discoveries. So, let us embrace this revelation with a sense of wonder and amazement, as we continue to untangle the complex web of human behavior and technological advancements.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our research not only confirm but also accentuate the intriguing connection between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i can't even". While this correlation may seem as unlikely as a sheep wearing a tuxedo, it aligns with the prior work that has explored the curious amalgamation of agricultural advancements and digital expressions.

Smith et al. (2017) laid the groundwork by highlighting the substantial improvements in cotton productivity attributed to the adoption of GMOs. It appears that this enhanced agronomic success has inadvertently sown the seeds of a linguistic phenomenon, reflected in the perplexing statistical relationship we have unearthed. Similarly, Doe and Jones (2019) delved into the evolution of online language, shedding light on the emergence of expressions like "i can't even" in the digital sphere. Our findings lend further credence to their observations by providing empirical support for the interconnectedness between these seemingly incongruous domains.

The whimsical narratives presented in "The Cotton Connection" and "The Cyber Chronicles" might appear fanciful at first glance, but their emphasis on the unforeseen repercussions of GMO usage and the digital doldrums foreshadows the very connection we have unveiled. It seems that fiction can sometimes be as prescient as a fortune teller with a crystal ball, offering a playful but poignant reflection of the real-world interplay between agricultural innovation and internet culture.

Looking back at the notorious Grumpy Cat meme and its embodiment of online exasperation, it becomes evident that our research not only corroborates but also extends the narrative of internet discontent. Just as Grumpy Cat's perennial scowl encapsulates the sentiment of frustration, our statistical analysis captures the essence of societal exasperation, intertwined with the evolution of agricultural practices.

In conclusion, our study adds a new chapter to the unconventional saga of GMO cotton and "i can't even" expressions, urging researchers to consider the unexpected interconnectedness of disparate fields. This unorthodox correlation transcends the bounds of traditional academic inquiry, compelling us to unravel the intricacies of human behavior and technological innovations. As we navigate through this labyrinth of interdisciplinary connections, it is imperative to maintain a keen sense of curiosity and humor, for in the enigma of research, the most bewildering discoveries often conceal a nugget of truth. So, let us revel in the bonanza of baffling correlations and embrace the unexpected with open minds and a dash of levity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in cotton in Texas and Google searches for 'i cant even'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
From Cotton Picking to Web Browsing: The "Can't Even" Correlation

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we explore the unlikely correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i can't even". While it may seem as unrelated as apples and oranges, our research reveals a surprising connection between the two. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9072241, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2022. The results challenge conventional wisdom and prompt us to ponder how cultivating GMO cotton has influenced the collective exasperation of internet users. Join us as we embark on this adventure through the cotton fields of Texas and the vast digital landscape of "can't even" expressions. Let's see if we can "thread" the needle between agricultural innovation and internet culture.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen, and esteemed colleagues, welcome to the whimsical world of agricultural and internet intersection! Today, we embark on a riveting journey through the labyrinth of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation and the often perplexing realm of internet vernacular, seeking to unravel the enigma behind the "Can't Even" correlation.
As our title suggests, we are delving into uncharted territories that may seem as mismatched as socks on a Monday morning, yet rest assured, our findings will leave you astonished, bemused, and quite possibly contemplating a career switch to cotton farming. The evident connection between GMO cotton and the "i can't even" phenomenon will have you questioning the very fabric of our digital society.
While we won't be picking cotton or typing code, we will be navigating through the fields of data, meticulously sifting through the fiber of USDA records and the interconnected web of Google searches. Our mission: to uncover if GMO cotton adoption can truly sow the seeds of frustration among internet denizens, leading them to collectively exclaim, "I can't even!"
So, fasten your seatbelts, adjust your spectacles, and let’s dive into this groundbreaking research, where we thread the needle between agricultural innovation and internet culture. Get ready to be cotton-pickin' amazed!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our research revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.9072241 between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i can't even". This positively bewildering correlation was further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8230556 and a p-value of less than 0.01, leaving us scratching our heads as we ponder the quirky interconnectedness of agricultural practices and internet exasperation.
In Figure 1, we present a scatterplot showcasing the unmistakable connection between these seemingly incongruous variables. The data points elegantly dance across the plot, revealing a strong linear relationship that defies logic and challenges traditional thinking. Take a moment to appreciate the irony of how GMO cotton, cultivated amid the vast Texan landscapes, appears to invoke a collective state of exasperation in the digital domain.
Our findings not only raise eyebrows but also open a Pandora's box of contemplation about the subtle influence of agricultural innovations on modern language and expressions. It seems that the threads of GMO cotton cultivation have woven their way into the very fabric of internet culture, resulting in an unexpected tapestry of "can't even" sentiments.
This captivating correlation between GMO cotton and "i can't even" searches invites us to explore the uncharted territories of interdisciplinary connections, reminding us that in the world of research, sometimes the most unexpected pairings lead to the most intriguing discoveries. So, let us embrace this revelation with a sense of wonder and amazement, as we continue to untangle the complex web of human behavior and technological advancements.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our investigation into the correlation between GMO cotton cultivation in Texas and the frequency of "i can't even" Google searches has left us feeling as perplexed as a chicken in a yoga class. Our findings have unveiled an astonishing connection that is as clear as a sunny day in the Lone Star State. It appears that the introduction of genetically modified cotton has not only revolutionized agricultural practices but has also managed to infiltrate the digital sphere, causing a virtual avalanche of exasperation.

As we reflect on the implications of our research, it's hard not to chuckle at the notion of unsuspecting cotton plants triggering a chorus of exasperated sighs and resigned proclamations of "I can't even" across the internet. We are left marveling at the quirkiness of this correlation, akin to discovering that a pineapple and a pizza could become a harmonious pair.

However, despite the amusement elicited by our findings, they present an intriguing conundrum for further contemplation. This unexpected union of agriculture and internet culture challenges us to rethink the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate domains.

Therefore, we confidently declare that no further research is needed in this area, as it's unlikely anything will top the sheer delight and astonishment we experienced in uncovering this compelling correlation. Let's leave this field of study on a high note, as we "can't even" begin to fathom what other mischievous connections lie waiting to be unearthed in the vast expanse of research.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited From Cotton Picking to Web Browsing: The Can't Even Correlation. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Quirky Quandaries


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited From Cotton Picking to Web Browsing: The Can't Even Correlation. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Humorous Sociological Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled From Cotton Picking to Web Browsing: The Can't Even Correlation with an abstract of In this paper, we explore the unlikely correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in cotton cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for the phrase "i can't even". While it may seem as unrelated as apples and oranges, our research reveals a surprising connection between the two. Utilizing data from the USDA and Google Trends, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9072241, with a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, spanning the years 2004 to 2022. The results challenge conventional wisdom and prompt us to ponder how cultivating GMO cotton has influenced the collective exasperation of internet users. Join us as we embark on this adventure through the cotton fields of Texas and the vast digital landscape of "can't even" expressions. Let's see if we can "thread" the needle between agricultural innovation and internet culture.

ChatGPT:

GMO cotton, Genetically modified organisms, Cotton cultivation, Texas, Google searches, "I can't even", Correlation, USDA data, Google Trends, Statistical analysis, Collective exasperation, Internet culture, Agricultural innovation

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in cotton in Texas
Detailed data title: Percent of cotton planted in Texas genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in cotton in Texas

Google searches for 'i cant even'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'i cant even' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'i cant even'

Correlation r = 0.9072241 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8230556 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 82.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'i cant even') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in cotton in Texas) over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.4E-8. 0.0000000840301125801096500000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.91 in 8.4E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 11,900,496 random variables You don't actually need 11 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.77, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in cotton in Texas (GMO cotton %)8141828313551495860747575767788808685
Google searches for 'i cant even' (Rel. search volume)11.83332433.58333234.7537.560.2563.333354.333363.2570.833374.7571.166772.41676355.916764.08336572.0833




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([8,14,18,28,31,35,51,49,58,60,74,75,75,76,77,88,80,86,85,])
array_2 = np.array([11.8333,24,33.5833,32,34.75,37.5,60.25,63.3333,54.3333,63.25,70.8333,74.75,71.1667,72.4167,63,55.9167,64.0833,65,72.0833,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in cotton in Texas"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'i cant even'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 2806 · Black Variable ID: 799 · Red Variable ID: 1525
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0