about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,802 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and the second variable is Number of Lawyers in the United States.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The GMO corn in North Dakota grew so tall that it actually crossed the legal height limit, leading to a spike in agricultural law cases. As the corn continued to stalk the fields, it created a maze of legal issues, attracting more and more lawyers who were just a-MAIZE-d by the whole situation. The crop of legal professionals couldn't kernel with the demand, ultimately ear-ning their place in the courtroom and contributing to the shocking rise in the number of lawyers in the United States.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a Discovery magazine cover showcasing a vast, lush cornfield in North Dakota. The rows of towering GMO corn stretch into the distance, creating a mesmerizing and intricate pattern. Within the cornfield, there are winding and elaborate corn mazes crafted to provide entertainment. Groups of people are visible within the mazes, seeking assistance as they struggle to find their way out. Additionally, a group of lawyers in sharp suits and determined expressions can be seen arriving at the maze to settle disputes and provide legal guidance to those in need. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Number of Lawyers in the United States. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A TIME magazine cover image A Discovery magazine cover image Celtic art A photo-realistic image Realistic
ChatGPT: A Discovery magazine cover image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Number of Lawyers in the United States, in the following situation: Because GMO corn has caused an increase in corn mazes, lawyers are needed to settle disputes when people get lost and can't find their way out.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast cornfield in North Dakota, rows of towering GMO corn stretch into the distance. Amidst the sea of green, intricate and winding corn mazes have been crafted to provide entertainment for visitors. Lost in the maze, groups of people are seen seeking help as they struggle to find their way out. In the distance, a group of lawyers in sharp suits and determined expressions can be seen arriving at the maze to settle disputes and provide legal guidance to those in need.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A Discovery magazine cover image ] and depicting this scene: In a vast cornfield in North Dakota, rows of towering GMO corn stretch into the distance. Amidst the sea of green, intricate and winding corn mazes have been crafted to provide entertainment for visitors. Lost in the maze, groups of people are seen seeking help as they struggle to find their way out. In the distance, a group of lawyers in sharp suits and determined expressions can be seen arriving at the maze to settle disputes and provide legal guidance to those in need. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a Discovery magazine cover showcasing a vast, lush cornfield in North Dakota. The rows of towering GMO corn stretch into the distance, creating a mesmerizing and intricate pattern. Within the cornfield, there are winding and elaborate corn mazes crafted to provide entertainment. Groups of people are visible within the mazes, seeking assistance as they struggle to find their way out. Additionally, a group of lawyers in sharp suits and determined expressions can be seen arriving at the maze to settle disputes and provide legal guidance to those in need.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota caused Number of Lawyers in the United States to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Corn-nections and Counsels: Investigating the Interplay of GMO Corn Cultivation in North Dakota and the Abundance of Attorneys in the United States

The Journal of Agri-Law Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Number of Lawyers in the United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from USDA and ABA to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9659899 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Corn-nections and Counsels: Investigating the Interplay of GMO Corn Cultivation in North Dakota and the Abundance of Attorneys in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the whimsical world of statistics to unravel the unexpected relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the cornhusker state of North Dakota and the populace of legal practitioners in the United States. Leveraging comprehensive data sets provided by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the American Bar Association (ABA), we undertook a rigorous statistical analysis spanning from 2005 to 2022.

Through our meticulous investigation, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9659899, leaving no kernel of doubt that a compelling association exists. Furthermore, our findings revealed a p-value of less than 0.01, affirming the robustness of this corn-nection. While we cannot ascertain the causality or mechanisms driving this intertwined phenomenon, our results certainly elevate the grain of truth underlying the synergy between GMO corn and the legal profession.

This study not only sheds light on the intriguing interplay of agriculture and law but also underscores the corn-ucopia of unexpected insights that can emerge from the fusion of disparate domains. We trust that our work will kernelate further discourse and inquiry into the unanticipated intersections of legal and agricultural landscapes.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Number of Lawyers in the United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Corn-nections and Counsels: Investigating the Interplay of GMO Corn Cultivation in North Dakota and the Abundance of Attorneys in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the whimsical world of statistics to unravel the unexpected relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the cornhusker state of North Dakota and the populace of legal practitioners in the United States. Leveraging comprehensive data sets provided by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the American Bar Association (ABA), we undertook a rigorous statistical analysis spanning from 2005 to 2022.

Through our meticulous investigation, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9659899, leaving no kernel of doubt that a compelling association exists. Furthermore, our findings revealed a p-value of less than 0.01, affirming the robustness of this corn-nection. While we cannot ascertain the causality or mechanisms driving this intertwined phenomenon, our results certainly elevate the grain of truth underlying the synergy between GMO corn and the legal profession.

This study not only sheds light on the intriguing interplay of agriculture and law but also underscores the corn-ucopia of unexpected insights that can emerge from the fusion of disparate domains. We trust that our work will kernelate further discourse and inquiry into the unanticipated intersections of legal and agricultural landscapes.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The landscape of agricultural biotechnology has undeniably transformed the practices and yields of crop cultivation, with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) at the forefront of this paradigm shift. In particular, the cultivation of GMO corn in the rich soils of North Dakota has not only captivated the attention of farmers, but it has also piqued the curiosity of researchers exploring the interplay between agricultural practices and broader societal phenomena.

As intriguing as it may sound, the connection between GMO corn cultivation and the abundance of legal practitioners in the United States is not merely a kernel of curiosity but a matter that warrants scientific investigation. While one may be tempted to dismiss it as mere cob-jecture, our rigorous examination of this seemingly disparate correlation has yielded results that are as robust as the stalks of corn themselves.

The intersection of kernels and counsels, though unconventional, brings to light the latent interconnectedness that permeates our complex socio-economic fabric. One must husk that beneath the surface of statistical analyses and data sets lie both the grit of empirical evidence and the potential for a-maize-ing discoveries that transcend disciplinary boundaries.

Thus, as we embark on this intellectual journey, we seek to unravel the inherent earresistible lure of this corn-nection and to glean insights that not only enrich our understanding of agricultural and legal dynamics but also remind us that statistical inquiry can sprout surprises in the most unexpected fields. So, dear readers, let us traverse these fertile lands of statistical analysis and legal contemplation, where the seeds of curiosity may sow the harvest of knowledge and perhaps a few ear-resistible puns along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Number of Lawyers in the United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Corn-nections and Counsels: Investigating the Interplay of GMO Corn Cultivation in North Dakota and the Abundance of Attorneys in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the whimsical world of statistics to unravel the unexpected relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the cornhusker state of North Dakota and the populace of legal practitioners in the United States. Leveraging comprehensive data sets provided by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the American Bar Association (ABA), we undertook a rigorous statistical analysis spanning from 2005 to 2022.

Through our meticulous investigation, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9659899, leaving no kernel of doubt that a compelling association exists. Furthermore, our findings revealed a p-value of less than 0.01, affirming the robustness of this corn-nection. While we cannot ascertain the causality or mechanisms driving this intertwined phenomenon, our results certainly elevate the grain of truth underlying the synergy between GMO corn and the legal profession.

This study not only sheds light on the intriguing interplay of agriculture and law but also underscores the corn-ucopia of unexpected insights that can emerge from the fusion of disparate domains. We trust that our work will kernelate further discourse and inquiry into the unanticipated intersections of legal and agricultural landscapes.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The landscape of agricultural biotechnology has undeniably transformed the practices and yields of crop cultivation, with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) at the forefront of this paradigm shift. In particular, the cultivation of GMO corn in the rich soils of North Dakota has not only captivated the attention of farmers, but it has also piqued the curiosity of researchers exploring the interplay between agricultural practices and broader societal phenomena.
As intriguing as it may sound, the connection between GMO corn cultivation and the abundance of legal practitioners in the United States is not merely a kernel of curiosity but a matter that warrants scientific investigation. While one may be tempted to dismiss it as mere cob-jecture, our rigorous examination of this seemingly disparate correlation has yielded results that are as robust as the stalks of corn themselves.
The intersection of kernels and counsels, though unconventional, brings to light the latent interconnectedness that permeates our complex socio-economic fabric. One must husk that beneath the surface of statistical analyses and data sets lie both the grit of empirical evidence and the potential for a-maize-ing discoveries that transcend disciplinary boundaries.
Thus, as we embark on this intellectual journey, we seek to unravel the inherent earresistible lure of this corn-nection and to glean insights that not only enrich our understanding of agricultural and legal dynamics but also remind us that statistical inquiry can sprout surprises in the most unexpected fields. So, dear readers, let us traverse these fertile lands of statistical analysis and legal contemplation, where the seeds of curiosity may sow the harvest of knowledge and perhaps a few ear-resistible puns along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

When delving into the labyrinthine realm of GMO corn cultivation and its purported correlation with the profusion of legal practitioners in the United States, researchers have endeavored to unearth empirical evidence from a myriad of sources. We begin our inquiry by scrutinizing the work of Smith and Doe, who, in their seminal study "Corn Chronicles," postulated a tenuous link between the proliferation of genetically modified corn in the heartland and the burgeoning number of lawyers in the country. Their findings, while intriguing, left unspoken the cornundrum of causality and the cobfounding variables at play in this perplexing association.

In a similar vein, Jones and Smith, in "GMOs and the Legal Landscape," meticulously dissected the statistical nuances underpinning the correlation between agricultural biotechnology and the legal profession. Their thorough analysis, akin to harvesting kernels of insight from a sprawling cornfield, elucidated the potential ramifications of this corn-paratively overlooked relationship. However, their scholarly discourse glossed over the potential for whimsy and wordplay inherent in a field ripe with pun-ential.

Turning to a broader examination of the socio-economic implications of GMO cultivation, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "Fast Food Nation" by Eric Schlosser furnish a contextual backdrop for understanding the cultural and agricultural dimensions of corn production. Although ostensibly unrelated to legal matters, these texts instill a deeper appreciation for the multivalent impact of corn on contemporary society and inadvertently plant the seeds of inquiry into its legal ramifications.

Furthermore, in the realm of fiction, the dystopian visions of corn-centric societies in "The Children of the Corn" by Stephen King and "Cornography" by Margaret Atwood infuse the imagination with alternate realities where legal wrangling is likely to ensue over matters of corn-related malfeasance. While this may seem like a foray into frivolity, these literary excursions serve to illuminate the cultural significance of corn and its potential legal entanglements in the popular imagination.

In a left-field departure from conventional sources, an exploratory foray into the realm of animated entertainment yields a-MAIZE-ing insights. The animated series "Corn & Oats" introduces viewers to a whimsical world where anthropomorphic corn cobs and their oat counterparts navigate the trials and tribulations of legal disputes within the idyllic confines of the cereal kingdom. While this may be dismissed as fodder for amusement, the recurring motifs of legal quandaries in this animated milieu invite contemplation regarding the pervasive presence of corn in legal discourse, notwithstanding its imaginary backdrop.

Thus, as we traverse this esoteric terrain of research and popcornulation, it becomes evident that the intersection of GMO corn cultivation and legal proliferation is not merely a matter of empirical scrutiny but a realm rife with potential for scholarly whimsy and unexpected revelations. It is within this fertile soil of investigation that our own study seeks to plant the seeds of inquiry, with the hope that it may yield a bountiful harvest of insights and perhaps even a few ear-prickling puns.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Number of Lawyers in the United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and ABA . You used data from 2005 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Corn-nections and Counsels: Investigating the Interplay of GMO Corn Cultivation in North Dakota and the Abundance of Attorneys in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the whimsical world of statistics to unravel the unexpected relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the cornhusker state of North Dakota and the populace of legal practitioners in the United States. Leveraging comprehensive data sets provided by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the American Bar Association (ABA), we undertook a rigorous statistical analysis spanning from 2005 to 2022.

Through our meticulous investigation, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9659899, leaving no kernel of doubt that a compelling association exists. Furthermore, our findings revealed a p-value of less than 0.01, affirming the robustness of this corn-nection. While we cannot ascertain the causality or mechanisms driving this intertwined phenomenon, our results certainly elevate the grain of truth underlying the synergy between GMO corn and the legal profession.

This study not only sheds light on the intriguing interplay of agriculture and law but also underscores the corn-ucopia of unexpected insights that can emerge from the fusion of disparate domains. We trust that our work will kernelate further discourse and inquiry into the unanticipated intersections of legal and agricultural landscapes.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The landscape of agricultural biotechnology has undeniably transformed the practices and yields of crop cultivation, with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) at the forefront of this paradigm shift. In particular, the cultivation of GMO corn in the rich soils of North Dakota has not only captivated the attention of farmers, but it has also piqued the curiosity of researchers exploring the interplay between agricultural practices and broader societal phenomena.
As intriguing as it may sound, the connection between GMO corn cultivation and the abundance of legal practitioners in the United States is not merely a kernel of curiosity but a matter that warrants scientific investigation. While one may be tempted to dismiss it as mere cob-jecture, our rigorous examination of this seemingly disparate correlation has yielded results that are as robust as the stalks of corn themselves.
The intersection of kernels and counsels, though unconventional, brings to light the latent interconnectedness that permeates our complex socio-economic fabric. One must husk that beneath the surface of statistical analyses and data sets lie both the grit of empirical evidence and the potential for a-maize-ing discoveries that transcend disciplinary boundaries.
Thus, as we embark on this intellectual journey, we seek to unravel the inherent earresistible lure of this corn-nection and to glean insights that not only enrich our understanding of agricultural and legal dynamics but also remind us that statistical inquiry can sprout surprises in the most unexpected fields. So, dear readers, let us traverse these fertile lands of statistical analysis and legal contemplation, where the seeds of curiosity may sow the harvest of knowledge and perhaps a few ear-resistible puns along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To uncover the corn-nection between GMO corn cultivation in North Dakota and the abundance of attorneys in the United States, we embarked on a quest to gather and analyze data that could shed light on this peculiar rapport. A harmonious symphony of statistical analyses, data mining, and a dash of whimsy formed the bedrock of our methodology.

Data Collection:
Our research team cast a wide net across the digital expanse in search of relevant information. The primary sources of data were the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the American Bar Association (ABA). We meticulously combed through datasets spanning from 2005 to 2022, ensuring that we captured the fluctuations and trends in GMO corn cultivation and the population of legal practitioners with the precision of a meticulous harvester.

GMO Corn Cultivation:
To measure the extent of GMO corn cultivation in North Dakota, we extracted data on the acreage dedicated to GMO corn cultivation, the yield per acre, and the prevalence of GMO traits in the corn strains. We sorted through an abundant cornucopia of agricultural statistics, sifting through the genetically modified kernels of information to discern the patterns and dynamics of GMO corn cultivation with the fervor of a discerning connoisseur.

Population of Attorneys:
In parallel, we dived into the realm of legal counseling, leveraging data on the number of licensed attorneys in the United States. This involved delving into the geographical distribution, practice areas, and fluctuations in the legal workforce over the studied period. Our quest for data was akin to navigating a legal labyrinth, where each piece of information added to the rich tapestry of legal demographics.

Statistical Analysis:
Armed with a sizable dataset that could rival the cornfields of the Midwest, we employed rigorous statistical techniques to explore the relationship between GMO corn cultivation in North Dakota and the abundance of attorneys in the United States. Correlation analysis, regression modeling, and time-series analysis were our trusty tools in untangling this corn-undrum.

Interdisciplinary Interpretation:
However, our endeavor extended beyond the confines of traditional statistical analyses. We adopted an interdisciplinary lens, drawing inspiration from the interdisciplinary charm of a Renaissance fair. This allowed us to tease out nuanced nuances that transcend mere numerical relationships and delve into the intertwined narratives of agricultural innovation and legal dynamics.

It is worth noting that our approach, while laden with statistical rigor, also embodied a spirit of curiosity akin to a scholar lost in the maze of a thought-provoking riddle. Our methodology danced the fine line between precision and whimsy, embracing the enigmatic allure of the corn-nection we sought to elucidate.

Control Variables and Sensitivity Analyses:
In our statistical expedition, we meticulously accounted for potential confounding factors and control variables that could sway the corn-nection one way or another, mirroring the astuteness of a legal counsel preparing a case. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to gauge the robustness of our findings, ensuring that the kernels of truth we uncovered were not mere statistical flukes.

Overall, our research methodology was a medley of traditional statistical rigor, interdisciplinary curiosity, and a dash of punny perspicacity. This allowed us to navigate the intriguing terrain of GMO corn cultivation and legal landscapes with equal parts precision and playfulness, culminating in a methodology as diverse and dynamic as the cornfields of North Dakota themselves.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Number of Lawyers in the United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and ABA .

For the time period 2005 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9659899, r-squared of 0.9331366, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Corn-nections and Counsels: Investigating the Interplay of GMO Corn Cultivation in North Dakota and the Abundance of Attorneys in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the whimsical world of statistics to unravel the unexpected relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the cornhusker state of North Dakota and the populace of legal practitioners in the United States. Leveraging comprehensive data sets provided by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the American Bar Association (ABA), we undertook a rigorous statistical analysis spanning from 2005 to 2022.

Through our meticulous investigation, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9659899, leaving no kernel of doubt that a compelling association exists. Furthermore, our findings revealed a p-value of less than 0.01, affirming the robustness of this corn-nection. While we cannot ascertain the causality or mechanisms driving this intertwined phenomenon, our results certainly elevate the grain of truth underlying the synergy between GMO corn and the legal profession.

This study not only sheds light on the intriguing interplay of agriculture and law but also underscores the corn-ucopia of unexpected insights that can emerge from the fusion of disparate domains. We trust that our work will kernelate further discourse and inquiry into the unanticipated intersections of legal and agricultural landscapes.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The landscape of agricultural biotechnology has undeniably transformed the practices and yields of crop cultivation, with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) at the forefront of this paradigm shift. In particular, the cultivation of GMO corn in the rich soils of North Dakota has not only captivated the attention of farmers, but it has also piqued the curiosity of researchers exploring the interplay between agricultural practices and broader societal phenomena.
As intriguing as it may sound, the connection between GMO corn cultivation and the abundance of legal practitioners in the United States is not merely a kernel of curiosity but a matter that warrants scientific investigation. While one may be tempted to dismiss it as mere cob-jecture, our rigorous examination of this seemingly disparate correlation has yielded results that are as robust as the stalks of corn themselves.
The intersection of kernels and counsels, though unconventional, brings to light the latent interconnectedness that permeates our complex socio-economic fabric. One must husk that beneath the surface of statistical analyses and data sets lie both the grit of empirical evidence and the potential for a-maize-ing discoveries that transcend disciplinary boundaries.
Thus, as we embark on this intellectual journey, we seek to unravel the inherent earresistible lure of this corn-nection and to glean insights that not only enrich our understanding of agricultural and legal dynamics but also remind us that statistical inquiry can sprout surprises in the most unexpected fields. So, dear readers, let us traverse these fertile lands of statistical analysis and legal contemplation, where the seeds of curiosity may sow the harvest of knowledge and perhaps a few ear-resistible puns along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in North Dakota and the number of lawyers in the United States has unveiled some remarkably intriguing findings. Utilizing data from 2005 to 2022, we observed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9659899 between these seemingly unrelated variables. This strong correlation was further buttressed by an r-squared value of 0.9331366, indicative of the robustness of the association. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and gives us corn-fidence in the significance of this corn-nection.

The implications of these results are as rich and complex as the soil in which GMO corn is cultivated. While our study does not presume to establish causality, it does shed light on the remarkable synergy between agricultural practices and the abundance of legal practitioners. As depicted in Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually confirms the compelling relationship between the two variables, leaving little room for corn-tradictory interpretations.

The unexpected nature of this association reinforces the notion that statistical inquiry can lead to the harvest of unexpected insights, particularly at the intersection of seemingly distinct domains. The remarkable strength of the correlation discovered in this study is striking and raises more questions than it answers, akin to a cornundrum that demands further investigation.

In summary, our comprehensive analysis has unearthed a curious corn-nection between GMO corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of lawyers in the United States, highlighting the pervasive nature of statistical surprises and the fruitful possibilities that arise from interdisciplinary exploration. We hope that our findings will not only stimulate further investigation into the corn-ucopia of unexpected connections but also evoke a few ear-to-ear smiles among our readers.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Number of Lawyers in the United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Corn-nections and Counsels: Investigating the Interplay of GMO Corn Cultivation in North Dakota and the Abundance of Attorneys in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the whimsical world of statistics to unravel the unexpected relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the cornhusker state of North Dakota and the populace of legal practitioners in the United States. Leveraging comprehensive data sets provided by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the American Bar Association (ABA), we undertook a rigorous statistical analysis spanning from 2005 to 2022.

Through our meticulous investigation, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9659899, leaving no kernel of doubt that a compelling association exists. Furthermore, our findings revealed a p-value of less than 0.01, affirming the robustness of this corn-nection. While we cannot ascertain the causality or mechanisms driving this intertwined phenomenon, our results certainly elevate the grain of truth underlying the synergy between GMO corn and the legal profession.

This study not only sheds light on the intriguing interplay of agriculture and law but also underscores the corn-ucopia of unexpected insights that can emerge from the fusion of disparate domains. We trust that our work will kernelate further discourse and inquiry into the unanticipated intersections of legal and agricultural landscapes.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
When delving into the labyrinthine realm of GMO corn cultivation and its purported correlation with the profusion of legal practitioners in the United States, researchers have endeavored to unearth empirical evidence from a myriad of sources. We begin our inquiry by scrutinizing the work of Smith and Doe, who, in their seminal study "Corn Chronicles," postulated a tenuous link between the proliferation of genetically modified corn in the heartland and the burgeoning number of lawyers in the country. Their findings, while intriguing, left unspoken the cornundrum of causality and the cobfounding variables at play in this perplexing association.
In a similar vein, Jones and Smith, in "GMOs and the Legal Landscape," meticulously dissected the statistical nuances underpinning the correlation between agricultural biotechnology and the legal profession. Their thorough analysis, akin to harvesting kernels of insight from a sprawling cornfield, elucidated the potential ramifications of this corn-paratively overlooked relationship. However, their scholarly discourse glossed over the potential for whimsy and wordplay inherent in a field ripe with pun-ential.
Turning to a broader examination of the socio-economic implications of GMO cultivation, "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "Fast Food Nation" by Eric Schlosser furnish a contextual backdrop for understanding the cultural and agricultural dimensions of corn production. Although ostensibly unrelated to legal matters, these texts instill a deeper appreciation for the multivalent impact of corn on contemporary society and inadvertently plant the seeds of inquiry into its legal ramifications.
Furthermore, in the realm of fiction, the dystopian visions of corn-centric societies in "The Children of the Corn" by Stephen King and "Cornography" by Margaret Atwood infuse the imagination with alternate realities where legal wrangling is likely to ensue over matters of corn-related malfeasance. While this may seem like a foray into frivolity, these literary excursions serve to illuminate the cultural significance of corn and its potential legal entanglements in the popular imagination.
In a left-field departure from conventional sources, an exploratory foray into the realm of animated entertainment yields a-MAIZE-ing insights. The animated series "Corn & Oats" introduces viewers to a whimsical world where anthropomorphic corn cobs and their oat counterparts navigate the trials and tribulations of legal disputes within the idyllic confines of the cereal kingdom. While this may be dismissed as fodder for amusement, the recurring motifs of legal quandaries in this animated milieu invite contemplation regarding the pervasive presence of corn in legal discourse, notwithstanding its imaginary backdrop.
Thus, as we traverse this esoteric terrain of research and popcornulation, it becomes evident that the intersection of GMO corn cultivation and legal proliferation is not merely a matter of empirical scrutiny but a realm rife with potential for scholarly whimsy and unexpected revelations. It is within this fertile soil of investigation that our own study seeks to plant the seeds of inquiry, with the hope that it may yield a bountiful harvest of insights and perhaps even a few ear-prickling puns.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in North Dakota and the number of lawyers in the United States has unveiled some remarkably intriguing findings. Utilizing data from 2005 to 2022, we observed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9659899 between these seemingly unrelated variables. This strong correlation was further buttressed by an r-squared value of 0.9331366, indicative of the robustness of the association. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and gives us corn-fidence in the significance of this corn-nection.
The implications of these results are as rich and complex as the soil in which GMO corn is cultivated. While our study does not presume to establish causality, it does shed light on the remarkable synergy between agricultural practices and the abundance of legal practitioners. As depicted in Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually confirms the compelling relationship between the two variables, leaving little room for corn-tradictory interpretations.
The unexpected nature of this association reinforces the notion that statistical inquiry can lead to the harvest of unexpected insights, particularly at the intersection of seemingly distinct domains. The remarkable strength of the correlation discovered in this study is striking and raises more questions than it answers, akin to a cornundrum that demands further investigation.
In summary, our comprehensive analysis has unearthed a curious corn-nection between GMO corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of lawyers in the United States, highlighting the pervasive nature of statistical surprises and the fruitful possibilities that arise from interdisciplinary exploration. We hope that our findings will not only stimulate further investigation into the corn-ucopia of unexpected connections but also evoke a few ear-to-ear smiles among our readers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have revealed a statistically significant correlation between the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in North Dakota and the number of lawyers in the United States, corroborating prior research that hinted at this enigmatic linkage. The robust correlation coefficient and r-squared value fortify the notion of a compelling association, affirming the nuanced interplay between agricultural biotechnology and the legal landscape.

Building upon the work of Smith and Doe, which first sowed the seeds of inquiry into this corn-undrum, our study provides quantitative evidence that complements their qualitative insights. Jones and Smith's meticulous dissection of the statistical nuances, while lacking in pun-ential, converges with our findings to underscore the gravity of this corn-nection. The correlation coefficient we uncovered mirrors their original suppositions, laying bare the corn-vergence of GMO corn cultivation and the burgeoning legal populace.

Furthermore, the contextual backdrop provided by Pollan and Schlosser in their manuscripts inadvertently yields kernels of wisdom in understanding the cultural and agricultural dimensions of corn production and its extended legal ramifications. The unexpected presence of literature exploring corn-based dystopias, as presented in the works of Stephen King and Margaret Atwood, has enlightened us to the potential legal entanglements woven within the fabric of corn-centric societies. This discussion may have seemed like a frivolous foray, but it illuminates the cultural significance of corn and its potential legal reverberations.

The animated whimsy of "Corn & Oats" may have appeared to be mere fodder for amusement, yet it invites contemplation regarding the pervasive presence of corn in legal discourse. While this seemingly whimsical exploration may have been dismissed as mere a-MAIZE-ment, it underscores the potency of corn-inspired legal quandaries, hinting at a deeper synergy between the narratives of agricultural biotechnology and legal disputes.

In light of our statistical revelations, it is apparent that the connection between GMO corn cultivation in North Dakota and the legal profession transcends mere statistical inquiry, venturing into a realm of surprising interdependencies. Our results not only affirm the significance of this corn-nection but also engender a sense of corn-fidence in the fertile prospects for further interdisciplinary exploration. It is within this fertile soil of investigation that our findings seek to sprout fruitful discourse and perhaps elicit a chuckle or two from our scholarly peers.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota and Number of Lawyers in the United States. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Corn-nections and Counsels: Investigating the Interplay of GMO Corn Cultivation in North Dakota and the Abundance of Attorneys in the United States

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the whimsical world of statistics to unravel the unexpected relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the cornhusker state of North Dakota and the populace of legal practitioners in the United States. Leveraging comprehensive data sets provided by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the American Bar Association (ABA), we undertook a rigorous statistical analysis spanning from 2005 to 2022.

Through our meticulous investigation, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9659899, leaving no kernel of doubt that a compelling association exists. Furthermore, our findings revealed a p-value of less than 0.01, affirming the robustness of this corn-nection. While we cannot ascertain the causality or mechanisms driving this intertwined phenomenon, our results certainly elevate the grain of truth underlying the synergy between GMO corn and the legal profession.

This study not only sheds light on the intriguing interplay of agriculture and law but also underscores the corn-ucopia of unexpected insights that can emerge from the fusion of disparate domains. We trust that our work will kernelate further discourse and inquiry into the unanticipated intersections of legal and agricultural landscapes.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The landscape of agricultural biotechnology has undeniably transformed the practices and yields of crop cultivation, with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) at the forefront of this paradigm shift. In particular, the cultivation of GMO corn in the rich soils of North Dakota has not only captivated the attention of farmers, but it has also piqued the curiosity of researchers exploring the interplay between agricultural practices and broader societal phenomena.
As intriguing as it may sound, the connection between GMO corn cultivation and the abundance of legal practitioners in the United States is not merely a kernel of curiosity but a matter that warrants scientific investigation. While one may be tempted to dismiss it as mere cob-jecture, our rigorous examination of this seemingly disparate correlation has yielded results that are as robust as the stalks of corn themselves.
The intersection of kernels and counsels, though unconventional, brings to light the latent interconnectedness that permeates our complex socio-economic fabric. One must husk that beneath the surface of statistical analyses and data sets lie both the grit of empirical evidence and the potential for a-maize-ing discoveries that transcend disciplinary boundaries.
Thus, as we embark on this intellectual journey, we seek to unravel the inherent earresistible lure of this corn-nection and to glean insights that not only enrich our understanding of agricultural and legal dynamics but also remind us that statistical inquiry can sprout surprises in the most unexpected fields. So, dear readers, let us traverse these fertile lands of statistical analysis and legal contemplation, where the seeds of curiosity may sow the harvest of knowledge and perhaps a few ear-resistible puns along the way.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in North Dakota and the number of lawyers in the United States has unveiled some remarkably intriguing findings. Utilizing data from 2005 to 2022, we observed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9659899 between these seemingly unrelated variables. This strong correlation was further buttressed by an r-squared value of 0.9331366, indicative of the robustness of the association. Moreover, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and gives us corn-fidence in the significance of this corn-nection.
The implications of these results are as rich and complex as the soil in which GMO corn is cultivated. While our study does not presume to establish causality, it does shed light on the remarkable synergy between agricultural practices and the abundance of legal practitioners. As depicted in Fig. 1, the scatterplot visually confirms the compelling relationship between the two variables, leaving little room for corn-tradictory interpretations.
The unexpected nature of this association reinforces the notion that statistical inquiry can lead to the harvest of unexpected insights, particularly at the intersection of seemingly distinct domains. The remarkable strength of the correlation discovered in this study is striking and raises more questions than it answers, akin to a cornundrum that demands further investigation.
In summary, our comprehensive analysis has unearthed a curious corn-nection between GMO corn cultivation in North Dakota and the number of lawyers in the United States, highlighting the pervasive nature of statistical surprises and the fruitful possibilities that arise from interdisciplinary exploration. We hope that our findings will not only stimulate further investigation into the corn-ucopia of unexpected connections but also evoke a few ear-to-ear smiles among our readers.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our study has humorously peeled back the layers of statistical analysis to reveal the unlikely yet intriguing link between the cultivation of GMO corn in the heartland of North Dakota and the abundance of legal practitioners in the United States. Our findings, akin to a golden ear of corn in a field of statistical tassels, have not only corncerned us with the robustness of this correlation but also cornvinced us of the earresistible nature of this unexpected relationship.

The nearly perfect correlation coefficient of 0.9659899 not only resonates with the precision of a well-shucked cob but also hints at the kernel of truth underlying this captivating corn-nection. Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9331366 underscores the fertile ground on which this statistical revelation stands, while the p-value, akin to a legal brief for the significance of this correlation, leaves little room for argument.

While we cannot transplant causality from these findings, the profound implications of this corn-nection are as vast as the maize fields of the Midwest. The inevitable question arises – what is the earresistible allure that draws GMO corn cultivation and legal practitioners into this statistical dance? The answer, much like the kernels nestled within a cob, remains elusive, beckoning further exploration at the crossroads of agriculture and law.

As we hang our statistical hats and close the statistical barn door on this research, we are inclined to declare that no more inquiry is needed in this area. The findings of this study have truly cornvinced us that statistical inquiry, much like corn cultivation, can yield unexpected and perhaps a-maize-ing insights. We hope that our findings not only ear-lighten the scholarly community but also edify with a few corny puns along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Corn-nections and Counsels: Investigating the Interplay of GMO Corn Cultivation in North Dakota and the Abundance of Attorneys in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agri-Law Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Corn-nections and Counsels: Investigating the Interplay of GMO Corn Cultivation in North Dakota and the Abundance of Attorneys in the United States. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Agricultural Advancement and Legal Analysis


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Corn-nections and Counsels: Investigating the Interplay of GMO Corn Cultivation in North Dakota and the Abundance of Attorneys in the United States with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the whimsical world of statistics to unravel the unexpected relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified organism (GMO) corn in the cornhusker state of North Dakota and the populace of legal practitioners in the United States. Leveraging comprehensive data sets provided by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the American Bar Association (ABA), we undertook a rigorous statistical analysis spanning from 2005 to 2022.
Through our meticulous investigation, we unearthed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9659899, leaving no kernel of doubt that a compelling association exists. Furthermore, our findings revealed a p-value of less than 0.01, affirming the robustness of this corn-nection. While we cannot ascertain the causality or mechanisms driving this intertwined phenomenon, our results certainly elevate the grain of truth underlying the synergy between GMO corn and the legal profession.
This study not only sheds light on the intriguing interplay of agriculture and law but also underscores the corn-ucopia of unexpected insights that can emerge from the fusion of disparate domains. We trust that our work will kernelate further discourse and inquiry into the unanticipated intersections of legal and agricultural landscapes.

ChatGPT:

GMO corn cultivation North Dakota, abundance attorneys United States, correlation GMO corn cultivation lawyers, statistics GMO corn legal practitioners, USDA data GMO corn cultivation, ABA data attorneys United States, correlation coefficient GMO corn legal profession, causality GMO corn legal practitioners, association GMO corn lawyers, interplay agriculture law, synergy GMO corn legal profession, unexpected intersections legal agricultural landscapes

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in North Dakota genetically modified with both Bt and HT
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota

Number of Lawyers in the United States
Detailed data title: The Count of ABA Lawyers in the United States
Source: ABA
See what else correlates with Number of Lawyers in the United States

Correlation r = 0.9659899 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9331366 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Number of Lawyers in the United States) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota) over the 18 years from 2005 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 8.09E-11. 0.0000000000808950396067284300
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 8.09E-9% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 12,361,697,390 random variables You don't actually need 12 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.91, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota (GMO corn %)152022314137394369687066676978757774
Number of Lawyers in the United States (Lawyers)110477011169701143360116212011803901203100122545012452001268010128143013007001312870133596013423801352080132874013279101327010




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([15,20,22,31,41,37,39,43,69,68,70,66,67,69,78,75,77,74,])
array_2 = np.array([1104770,1116970,1143360,1162120,1180390,1203100,1225450,1245200,1268010,1281430,1300700,1312870,1335960,1342380,1352080,1328740,1327910,1327010,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in North Dakota"
array_2_name = "Number of Lawyers in the United States"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're the correlation whisperer we needed!


Correlation ID: 2802 · Black Variable ID: 747 · Red Variable ID: 542
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0