about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,761 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the second variable is Wins for the Cincinnati Reds.  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the Master's degrees in Library science decreased, so did the Dewey Decimals for success, leading to a loss in the card catalog of wins for the Reds. The correlation is clearly overdue for a resurgence, but for now, it seems the home team may need to shelve their championship aspirations.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Realistic ] In a bustling library, a proud librarian stands behind a wooden desk adorned with neatly arranged books. The librarian, with a warm smile, extends a Master's degree in Library Science to a beaming graduate wearing a cap and gown. Meanwhile, on the vast baseball field, a despondent Cincinnati Reds player is seen in the foreground, shoulders drooped and head bowed as the opposing team joyfully celebrates a hard-earned victory, their elation evident in the background. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Master's degrees awarded in Library science and Wins for the Cincinnati Reds. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Data cyber art a meme An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie Vaporwave Realistic
ChatGPT: Realistic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Master's degrees awarded in Library science and Wins for the Cincinnati Reds, in the following situation: Because as the number of librarians decreased, the Cincinnati Reds lost access to crucial game-winning information hidden within the Dewey Decimal System. With fewer librarians to decode the cryptic information, the Reds were left fumbling in the dark, leading to their decrease in wins.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In the library, a librarian proudly hands a graduate a Master's degree in Library Science, while on the baseball field, the Cincinnati Reds player looks disheartened as the opposing team celebrates another win.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Realistic ] and depicting this scene: In the library, a librarian proudly hands a graduate a Master's degree in Library Science, while on the baseball field, the Cincinnati Reds player looks disheartened as the opposing team celebrates another win. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Realistic ] In a bustling library, a proud librarian stands behind a wooden desk adorned with neatly arranged books. The librarian, with a warm smile, extends a Master's degree in Library Science to a beaming graduate wearing a cap and gown. Meanwhile, on the vast baseball field, a despondent Cincinnati Reds player is seen in the foreground, shoulders drooped and head bowed as the opposing team joyfully celebrates a hard-earned victory, their elation evident in the background.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Master's degrees awarded in Library science caused Wins for the Cincinnati Reds to decrease. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Dewey Decimal Derby: Exploring the Relationship between Library Science Master's Degrees and Cincinnati Reds Wins

The Journal of Bibliographic Baseball Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Library science and Wins for the Cincinnati Reds. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8202952 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Dewey Decimal Derby: Exploring the Relationship between Library Science Master's Degrees and Cincinnati Reds Wins

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a bibliographic journey to unravel an unexpected connection between Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the on-field performance of the Cincinnati Reds. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com, we meticulously examined the correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables for the period 2012 to 2021. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8202952 and p < 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between the two. This leads us to conclude that while "silence is golden," a good librarian might just bring home the gold for the Reds.

On a related note, did you hear about the librarian who won the baseball game? She really knows how to "pitch" the right information, both in the library and on the mound!

Furthermore, we delve into the implications of our findings for both the field of library science and the sports industry. This unexpected connection prompts us to ponder the intriguing ways in which seemingly disparate domains may intersect. Our study sheds light on the potential impact of knowledge management on athletic achievement, and perhaps even on the "book on baseball." We encourage further examination of unconventional associations, as they often unveil valuable insights and, in this case, keep us "in the know" about baseball and libraries.

Speaking of which, isn't it a little bit like a library when the team's pitcher is on fire? All you can hear are "strikes" and "shhh's."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Library science and Wins for the Cincinnati Reds. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Dewey Decimal Derby: Exploring the Relationship between Library Science Master's Degrees and Cincinnati Reds Wins

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a bibliographic journey to unravel an unexpected connection between Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the on-field performance of the Cincinnati Reds. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com, we meticulously examined the correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables for the period 2012 to 2021. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8202952 and p < 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between the two. This leads us to conclude that while "silence is golden," a good librarian might just bring home the gold for the Reds.

On a related note, did you hear about the librarian who won the baseball game? She really knows how to "pitch" the right information, both in the library and on the mound!

Furthermore, we delve into the implications of our findings for both the field of library science and the sports industry. This unexpected connection prompts us to ponder the intriguing ways in which seemingly disparate domains may intersect. Our study sheds light on the potential impact of knowledge management on athletic achievement, and perhaps even on the "book on baseball." We encourage further examination of unconventional associations, as they often unveil valuable insights and, in this case, keep us "in the know" about baseball and libraries.

Speaking of which, isn't it a little bit like a library when the team's pitcher is on fire? All you can hear are "strikes" and "shhh's."

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The curious confluence of library science and baseball has long been a topic of playful speculation, provoking a mix of head-scratching and knowing smiles. What could the organization of information and the pursuit of knowledge possibly have in common with America's favorite pastime? In this paper, we take a swing at unraveling this web of curiosity by exploring the surprising relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the wins of the Cincinnati Reds over a ten-year period.

It's a well-known fact that "information" is crucial to both librarians and baseball teams. While one deals with cataloging knowledge and the other with cataloging hits, there might just be a statistical home run to be found in the overlap between the two. As we embark on this statistical adventure, we can't help but appreciate the irony that we are diving into the "bookish" world of libraries to shed light on the "playbook" of baseball.

Did you hear about the librarian who enjoyed the baseball game? She couldn't help but hit it off with the players—after all, she knows a thing or two about "checking out"!

As we begin our exploration, we believe it is crucial to recognize the inherent humor and possibilities for unexpected discoveries that such research can yield. By applying rigorous statistical analysis to this seemingly whimsical connection, we aim to not only unravel the curious correlation but also to celebrate the joy of uncovering unexpected parallels in the world of data and human endeavor.

It's a bit like searching for a book in the library—sometimes the most unexpected discoveries are hidden in the dusty shelves of whimsy and chance. And who knows, maybe our research will reveal a winning "chapter" in the story of baseball and librarianship.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Library science and Wins for the Cincinnati Reds. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Dewey Decimal Derby: Exploring the Relationship between Library Science Master's Degrees and Cincinnati Reds Wins

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a bibliographic journey to unravel an unexpected connection between Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the on-field performance of the Cincinnati Reds. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com, we meticulously examined the correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables for the period 2012 to 2021. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8202952 and p < 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between the two. This leads us to conclude that while "silence is golden," a good librarian might just bring home the gold for the Reds.

On a related note, did you hear about the librarian who won the baseball game? She really knows how to "pitch" the right information, both in the library and on the mound!

Furthermore, we delve into the implications of our findings for both the field of library science and the sports industry. This unexpected connection prompts us to ponder the intriguing ways in which seemingly disparate domains may intersect. Our study sheds light on the potential impact of knowledge management on athletic achievement, and perhaps even on the "book on baseball." We encourage further examination of unconventional associations, as they often unveil valuable insights and, in this case, keep us "in the know" about baseball and libraries.

Speaking of which, isn't it a little bit like a library when the team's pitcher is on fire? All you can hear are "strikes" and "shhh's."

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The curious confluence of library science and baseball has long been a topic of playful speculation, provoking a mix of head-scratching and knowing smiles. What could the organization of information and the pursuit of knowledge possibly have in common with America's favorite pastime? In this paper, we take a swing at unraveling this web of curiosity by exploring the surprising relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the wins of the Cincinnati Reds over a ten-year period.
It's a well-known fact that "information" is crucial to both librarians and baseball teams. While one deals with cataloging knowledge and the other with cataloging hits, there might just be a statistical home run to be found in the overlap between the two. As we embark on this statistical adventure, we can't help but appreciate the irony that we are diving into the "bookish" world of libraries to shed light on the "playbook" of baseball.
Did you hear about the librarian who enjoyed the baseball game? She couldn't help but hit it off with the players—after all, she knows a thing or two about "checking out"!
As we begin our exploration, we believe it is crucial to recognize the inherent humor and possibilities for unexpected discoveries that such research can yield. By applying rigorous statistical analysis to this seemingly whimsical connection, we aim to not only unravel the curious correlation but also to celebrate the joy of uncovering unexpected parallels in the world of data and human endeavor.
It's a bit like searching for a book in the library—sometimes the most unexpected discoveries are hidden in the dusty shelves of whimsy and chance. And who knows, maybe our research will reveal a winning "chapter" in the story of baseball and librarianship.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The research examining the unexpected correlation between Master's degrees in Library science and the performance of the Cincinnati Reds spans a wide array of disciplines, from education and sports science to statistical analysis and even popular culture. Smith et al. (2015) present a comprehensive survey of Master's degree programs in Library science, examining the demographics of students and the regional distribution of these programs. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) delve into the intricate dynamics of baseball wins, considering various factors such as player performance, management strategies, and fan engagement. However, the convergence of these seemingly unrelated domains has been explored by only a handful of researchers, leaving much to be uncovered.

Turning to non-fiction works, "The Library Book" by Susan Orlean offers an in-depth exploration of the history and significance of libraries, providing valuable insights into the world of knowledge organization and preservation. Similarly, "Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game" by Michael Lewis investigates the unorthodox methods employed by the Oakland Athletics baseball team to achieve success in the face of financial constraints. These works shed light on the intricate tapestry of libraries and sports, setting the stage for our investigation into their unexpected interconnection.

Now, let's take a leap into the world of fiction. "The Shadow of the Wind" by Carlos Ruiz Zafón immerses readers in the mysterious labyrinth of a forgotten library in post-war Barcelona, offering a captivating portrayal of the power of literature and the quest for hidden truths. On the other hand, "The Art of Fielding" by Chad Harbach weaves a tale of college baseball and the pursuit of excellence, drawing parallels between the dedication of athletes and the pursuit of knowledge. While these fictional narratives may seem far removed from academic inquiry, they demonstrate the recurrent theme of the intersection between the collective human pursuit of knowledge and the joy of athletic achievement.

Our immersion in the existing literature is not complete without a nod to the insights gleaned from social media. From Twitter threads celebrating the achievements of librarians to Instagram posts capturing the exuberant spirit of baseball fans, the digital landscape reveals a myriad of anecdotes and perspectives that point to the subtle connection between the two spheres. One user aptly quipped, "Who knew that the real playbook for the Reds is actually tucked away in the Library of Congress?" The wit and humor in these online conversations serve as an enduring reminder of the delightful discoveries that may await us in this uncharted territory of statistical exploration.

And for those baseball fans eager to hit the books, here's a joke for you: Why are librarians great at baseball? Because they know how to "play it by the book"!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Library science and Wins for the Cincinnati Reds. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Dewey Decimal Derby: Exploring the Relationship between Library Science Master's Degrees and Cincinnati Reds Wins

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a bibliographic journey to unravel an unexpected connection between Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the on-field performance of the Cincinnati Reds. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com, we meticulously examined the correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables for the period 2012 to 2021. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8202952 and p < 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between the two. This leads us to conclude that while "silence is golden," a good librarian might just bring home the gold for the Reds.

On a related note, did you hear about the librarian who won the baseball game? She really knows how to "pitch" the right information, both in the library and on the mound!

Furthermore, we delve into the implications of our findings for both the field of library science and the sports industry. This unexpected connection prompts us to ponder the intriguing ways in which seemingly disparate domains may intersect. Our study sheds light on the potential impact of knowledge management on athletic achievement, and perhaps even on the "book on baseball." We encourage further examination of unconventional associations, as they often unveil valuable insights and, in this case, keep us "in the know" about baseball and libraries.

Speaking of which, isn't it a little bit like a library when the team's pitcher is on fire? All you can hear are "strikes" and "shhh's."

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The curious confluence of library science and baseball has long been a topic of playful speculation, provoking a mix of head-scratching and knowing smiles. What could the organization of information and the pursuit of knowledge possibly have in common with America's favorite pastime? In this paper, we take a swing at unraveling this web of curiosity by exploring the surprising relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the wins of the Cincinnati Reds over a ten-year period.
It's a well-known fact that "information" is crucial to both librarians and baseball teams. While one deals with cataloging knowledge and the other with cataloging hits, there might just be a statistical home run to be found in the overlap between the two. As we embark on this statistical adventure, we can't help but appreciate the irony that we are diving into the "bookish" world of libraries to shed light on the "playbook" of baseball.
Did you hear about the librarian who enjoyed the baseball game? She couldn't help but hit it off with the players—after all, she knows a thing or two about "checking out"!
As we begin our exploration, we believe it is crucial to recognize the inherent humor and possibilities for unexpected discoveries that such research can yield. By applying rigorous statistical analysis to this seemingly whimsical connection, we aim to not only unravel the curious correlation but also to celebrate the joy of uncovering unexpected parallels in the world of data and human endeavor.
It's a bit like searching for a book in the library—sometimes the most unexpected discoveries are hidden in the dusty shelves of whimsy and chance. And who knows, maybe our research will reveal a winning "chapter" in the story of baseball and librarianship.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To embark on our academic exploration of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the winning performance of the Cincinnati Reds, we employed a combination of statistical and data analysis methods with a touch of literary flair. Our research endeavor was akin to navigating a fascinating maze, where the statistical tools served as our compass through the data landscape, while the whimsical spirit of curiosity was our guiding light.

First, we scoured the digital corridors of the National Center for Education Statistics to gather detailed information on the number of Master's degrees awarded in Library science from 2012 to 2021. The pursuit of this data involved stringing together intricate search queries, much like threading through the plot of a complex novel, to ensure comprehensive coverage of relevant academic achievements in the field of library science. In parallel, we wandered through the virtual bleachers of Baseball-Reference.com, unraveling the wins achieved by the Cincinnati Reds during the same period. We cross-referenced these sources with the precision of a skilled detective, seeking to unearth any underlying patterns that might offer insight into this unexpected correlation.

Once the datasets were in hand, we unleashed the full array of statistical analyses upon our acquired knowledge, akin to wielding a powerful literary magnifying glass to examine the intriguing characters within a narrative. We calculated the correlation coefficient between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the wins of the Cincinnati Reds, employing the Pearson correlation method to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship. This statistical exercise allowed us to measure the extent of association between these two seemingly divergent entities and unveil the potential interplay between them.

Coupled with this correlation analysis, we wielded the formidable tool of regression analysis to untangle the intricate yarn of causation lurking behind the observed association. By examining the relationship between the predictor variable (Master's degrees awarded in Library science) and the outcome variable (Cincinnati Reds wins), we sought to unravel any nuanced threads of influence that might shed light on the underlying mechanisms governing this enigmatic connection.

Finally, to ensure the robustness of our findings, we conducted a series of sensitivity analyses, akin to scrutinizing alternate plotlines in a literary story. We evaluated the impact of different time periods and examined potential confounding variables, such as regional influences and team dynamics, to guard against the intrusion of spurious relationships.

In consonance with the data-driven journey we had embarked upon, we approached our methodology with the spirit of a scholarly detective unraveling a literary mystery – navigating through the data landscape with meticulous scrutiny and an unyielding determination to unearth the unexpected correlations that lurked within. In doing so, we endeavored to uncover the intriguing story woven between the numbers of Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the triumphs of the Cincinnati Reds, with the hope of shedding light on the most unexpected parallels in the world of data and human endeavor.

Just remember, statistics are a lot like a good book—full of plot twists and sometimes completely unexpected sequels!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Library science and Wins for the Cincinnati Reds. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8202952, r-squared of 0.6728843, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Dewey Decimal Derby: Exploring the Relationship between Library Science Master's Degrees and Cincinnati Reds Wins

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a bibliographic journey to unravel an unexpected connection between Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the on-field performance of the Cincinnati Reds. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com, we meticulously examined the correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables for the period 2012 to 2021. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8202952 and p < 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between the two. This leads us to conclude that while "silence is golden," a good librarian might just bring home the gold for the Reds.

On a related note, did you hear about the librarian who won the baseball game? She really knows how to "pitch" the right information, both in the library and on the mound!

Furthermore, we delve into the implications of our findings for both the field of library science and the sports industry. This unexpected connection prompts us to ponder the intriguing ways in which seemingly disparate domains may intersect. Our study sheds light on the potential impact of knowledge management on athletic achievement, and perhaps even on the "book on baseball." We encourage further examination of unconventional associations, as they often unveil valuable insights and, in this case, keep us "in the know" about baseball and libraries.

Speaking of which, isn't it a little bit like a library when the team's pitcher is on fire? All you can hear are "strikes" and "shhh's."

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The curious confluence of library science and baseball has long been a topic of playful speculation, provoking a mix of head-scratching and knowing smiles. What could the organization of information and the pursuit of knowledge possibly have in common with America's favorite pastime? In this paper, we take a swing at unraveling this web of curiosity by exploring the surprising relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the wins of the Cincinnati Reds over a ten-year period.
It's a well-known fact that "information" is crucial to both librarians and baseball teams. While one deals with cataloging knowledge and the other with cataloging hits, there might just be a statistical home run to be found in the overlap between the two. As we embark on this statistical adventure, we can't help but appreciate the irony that we are diving into the "bookish" world of libraries to shed light on the "playbook" of baseball.
Did you hear about the librarian who enjoyed the baseball game? She couldn't help but hit it off with the players—after all, she knows a thing or two about "checking out"!
As we begin our exploration, we believe it is crucial to recognize the inherent humor and possibilities for unexpected discoveries that such research can yield. By applying rigorous statistical analysis to this seemingly whimsical connection, we aim to not only unravel the curious correlation but also to celebrate the joy of uncovering unexpected parallels in the world of data and human endeavor.
It's a bit like searching for a book in the library—sometimes the most unexpected discoveries are hidden in the dusty shelves of whimsy and chance. And who knows, maybe our research will reveal a winning "chapter" in the story of baseball and librarianship.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data gathered from the National Center for Education Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com for the time period 2012 to 2021 yielded some unexpected and intriguing results. We found a positively robust correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the wins of the Cincinnati Reds, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8202952 and an r-squared of 0.6728843. The p-value was found to be less than 0.01, indicating the statistical significance of the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables.

Fig. 1 shows the scatterplot illustrating the strong correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the wins of the Cincinnati Reds. This captivating visualization truly drives home the astonishment of our findings and exemplifies the unexpected parallels that can emerge from the most unconventional intersections of data.

In the realm of unexpected connections, we can't help but marvel at the way in which the pursuit of knowledge organization and the pursuit of athletic victories intertwine in this statistical dance. It seems that while librarians excel at organizing information, they might just have a knack for organizing wins for the Reds as well. Who would have thought that Dewey Decimals and baseball decimals could ever be related?

It's like a librarian reaching the shelving unit before the ball – they really "steal" the show! We can't help but wonder if they're using the "Dewey" Decimal system to keep track of the Reds' wins!

This unexpected correlation prompts us to consider the profound impact of this seemingly whimsical connection on both the field of library science and the sports industry. It allows us to appreciate the ways in which knowledge management and athletic achievement can intersect and influence one another. The implications of this revelation may reach even further than we initially anticipated, and we look forward to future research that delves into the deep "catalog" of potential insights that may arise from such unexpected intersections.

In conclusion, our findings highlight the immeasurable value of exploring unexpected connections, as they often lead to invaluable insights and unexpected comedic relief, whether on the baseball field or within the hallowed halls of the library.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Library science and Wins for the Cincinnati Reds. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Dewey Decimal Derby: Exploring the Relationship between Library Science Master's Degrees and Cincinnati Reds Wins

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a bibliographic journey to unravel an unexpected connection between Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the on-field performance of the Cincinnati Reds. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com, we meticulously examined the correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables for the period 2012 to 2021. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8202952 and p < 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between the two. This leads us to conclude that while "silence is golden," a good librarian might just bring home the gold for the Reds.

On a related note, did you hear about the librarian who won the baseball game? She really knows how to "pitch" the right information, both in the library and on the mound!

Furthermore, we delve into the implications of our findings for both the field of library science and the sports industry. This unexpected connection prompts us to ponder the intriguing ways in which seemingly disparate domains may intersect. Our study sheds light on the potential impact of knowledge management on athletic achievement, and perhaps even on the "book on baseball." We encourage further examination of unconventional associations, as they often unveil valuable insights and, in this case, keep us "in the know" about baseball and libraries.

Speaking of which, isn't it a little bit like a library when the team's pitcher is on fire? All you can hear are "strikes" and "shhh's."

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The research examining the unexpected correlation between Master's degrees in Library science and the performance of the Cincinnati Reds spans a wide array of disciplines, from education and sports science to statistical analysis and even popular culture. Smith et al. (2015) present a comprehensive survey of Master's degree programs in Library science, examining the demographics of students and the regional distribution of these programs. Meanwhile, Doe and Jones (2018) delve into the intricate dynamics of baseball wins, considering various factors such as player performance, management strategies, and fan engagement. However, the convergence of these seemingly unrelated domains has been explored by only a handful of researchers, leaving much to be uncovered.
Turning to non-fiction works, "The Library Book" by Susan Orlean offers an in-depth exploration of the history and significance of libraries, providing valuable insights into the world of knowledge organization and preservation. Similarly, "Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game" by Michael Lewis investigates the unorthodox methods employed by the Oakland Athletics baseball team to achieve success in the face of financial constraints. These works shed light on the intricate tapestry of libraries and sports, setting the stage for our investigation into their unexpected interconnection.
Now, let's take a leap into the world of fiction. "The Shadow of the Wind" by Carlos Ruiz Zafón immerses readers in the mysterious labyrinth of a forgotten library in post-war Barcelona, offering a captivating portrayal of the power of literature and the quest for hidden truths. On the other hand, "The Art of Fielding" by Chad Harbach weaves a tale of college baseball and the pursuit of excellence, drawing parallels between the dedication of athletes and the pursuit of knowledge. While these fictional narratives may seem far removed from academic inquiry, they demonstrate the recurrent theme of the intersection between the collective human pursuit of knowledge and the joy of athletic achievement.
Our immersion in the existing literature is not complete without a nod to the insights gleaned from social media. From Twitter threads celebrating the achievements of librarians to Instagram posts capturing the exuberant spirit of baseball fans, the digital landscape reveals a myriad of anecdotes and perspectives that point to the subtle connection between the two spheres. One user aptly quipped, "Who knew that the real playbook for the Reds is actually tucked away in the Library of Congress?" The wit and humor in these online conversations serve as an enduring reminder of the delightful discoveries that may await us in this uncharted territory of statistical exploration.
And for those baseball fans eager to hit the books, here's a joke for you: Why are librarians great at baseball? Because they know how to "play it by the book"!

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data gathered from the National Center for Education Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com for the time period 2012 to 2021 yielded some unexpected and intriguing results. We found a positively robust correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the wins of the Cincinnati Reds, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8202952 and an r-squared of 0.6728843. The p-value was found to be less than 0.01, indicating the statistical significance of the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables.
Fig. 1 shows the scatterplot illustrating the strong correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the wins of the Cincinnati Reds. This captivating visualization truly drives home the astonishment of our findings and exemplifies the unexpected parallels that can emerge from the most unconventional intersections of data.
In the realm of unexpected connections, we can't help but marvel at the way in which the pursuit of knowledge organization and the pursuit of athletic victories intertwine in this statistical dance. It seems that while librarians excel at organizing information, they might just have a knack for organizing wins for the Reds as well. Who would have thought that Dewey Decimals and baseball decimals could ever be related?
It's like a librarian reaching the shelving unit before the ball – they really "steal" the show! We can't help but wonder if they're using the "Dewey" Decimal system to keep track of the Reds' wins!
This unexpected correlation prompts us to consider the profound impact of this seemingly whimsical connection on both the field of library science and the sports industry. It allows us to appreciate the ways in which knowledge management and athletic achievement can intersect and influence one another. The implications of this revelation may reach even further than we initially anticipated, and we look forward to future research that delves into the deep "catalog" of potential insights that may arise from such unexpected intersections.
In conclusion, our findings highlight the immeasurable value of exploring unexpected connections, as they often lead to invaluable insights and unexpected comedic relief, whether on the baseball field or within the hallowed halls of the library.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our investigation into the relationship between Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the wins of the Cincinnati Reds are nothing short of remarkable. Our findings affirm and extend prior research that hints at the quirky connection between seemingly unrelated domains.

The statistical relationship uncovered in our study underscores the profound impact of knowledge management on athletic achievement. When librarians are adept at organizing information, it turns out they might also be organizing wins for the Reds – talk about a double play! This unexpected correlation demonstrates the potential for unconventional intersections of data to yield valuable insights, proving that sometimes the most unexpected pairings can hit statistical home runs.

Moreover, our findings provide empirical support for the quips and humorous musings we encountered in the existing literature and on social media. The digital landscape has not only captured the essence of this unlikely connection but also foreshadowed the statistical revelation we have unveiled. Indeed, it seems that the real playbook for the Reds may be metaphorically shelved in the Library of Congress after all – who knew?

Our results bring to mind a classic dad joke: Why did the librarian get kicked off the baseball team? Because she was "caught stealing" – of course, we’re talking about bases and not books!

The implications of this discovery extend beyond the realms of library science and sports. Our study emphasizes the potential for interdisciplinary insights that may emerge from exploring unconventional associations in the vast realm of statistical inquiry. It invites researchers to ponder the uncharted territories of statistical exploration, where unexpected connections may lead to both profound insights and amusing anecdotes.

In summary, our findings not only affirm the robust statistical relationship between Master's degrees in Library science and Cincinnati Reds wins but also encourage further exploration of unconventional associations in statistical research. The statistical diamond has its surprises, and we are just getting started in uncovering the witty and unexpected twists hidden within its numerical intricacies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Master's degrees awarded in Library science and Wins for the Cincinnati Reds. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Dewey Decimal Derby: Exploring the Relationship between Library Science Master's Degrees and Cincinnati Reds Wins

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we embark on a bibliographic journey to unravel an unexpected connection between Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the on-field performance of the Cincinnati Reds. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com, we meticulously examined the correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables for the period 2012 to 2021. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8202952 and p < 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between the two. This leads us to conclude that while "silence is golden," a good librarian might just bring home the gold for the Reds.

On a related note, did you hear about the librarian who won the baseball game? She really knows how to "pitch" the right information, both in the library and on the mound!

Furthermore, we delve into the implications of our findings for both the field of library science and the sports industry. This unexpected connection prompts us to ponder the intriguing ways in which seemingly disparate domains may intersect. Our study sheds light on the potential impact of knowledge management on athletic achievement, and perhaps even on the "book on baseball." We encourage further examination of unconventional associations, as they often unveil valuable insights and, in this case, keep us "in the know" about baseball and libraries.

Speaking of which, isn't it a little bit like a library when the team's pitcher is on fire? All you can hear are "strikes" and "shhh's."

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The curious confluence of library science and baseball has long been a topic of playful speculation, provoking a mix of head-scratching and knowing smiles. What could the organization of information and the pursuit of knowledge possibly have in common with America's favorite pastime? In this paper, we take a swing at unraveling this web of curiosity by exploring the surprising relationship between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the wins of the Cincinnati Reds over a ten-year period.
It's a well-known fact that "information" is crucial to both librarians and baseball teams. While one deals with cataloging knowledge and the other with cataloging hits, there might just be a statistical home run to be found in the overlap between the two. As we embark on this statistical adventure, we can't help but appreciate the irony that we are diving into the "bookish" world of libraries to shed light on the "playbook" of baseball.
Did you hear about the librarian who enjoyed the baseball game? She couldn't help but hit it off with the players—after all, she knows a thing or two about "checking out"!
As we begin our exploration, we believe it is crucial to recognize the inherent humor and possibilities for unexpected discoveries that such research can yield. By applying rigorous statistical analysis to this seemingly whimsical connection, we aim to not only unravel the curious correlation but also to celebrate the joy of uncovering unexpected parallels in the world of data and human endeavor.
It's a bit like searching for a book in the library—sometimes the most unexpected discoveries are hidden in the dusty shelves of whimsy and chance. And who knows, maybe our research will reveal a winning "chapter" in the story of baseball and librarianship.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data gathered from the National Center for Education Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com for the time period 2012 to 2021 yielded some unexpected and intriguing results. We found a positively robust correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the wins of the Cincinnati Reds, with a correlation coefficient of 0.8202952 and an r-squared of 0.6728843. The p-value was found to be less than 0.01, indicating the statistical significance of the relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables.
Fig. 1 shows the scatterplot illustrating the strong correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the wins of the Cincinnati Reds. This captivating visualization truly drives home the astonishment of our findings and exemplifies the unexpected parallels that can emerge from the most unconventional intersections of data.
In the realm of unexpected connections, we can't help but marvel at the way in which the pursuit of knowledge organization and the pursuit of athletic victories intertwine in this statistical dance. It seems that while librarians excel at organizing information, they might just have a knack for organizing wins for the Reds as well. Who would have thought that Dewey Decimals and baseball decimals could ever be related?
It's like a librarian reaching the shelving unit before the ball – they really "steal" the show! We can't help but wonder if they're using the "Dewey" Decimal system to keep track of the Reds' wins!
This unexpected correlation prompts us to consider the profound impact of this seemingly whimsical connection on both the field of library science and the sports industry. It allows us to appreciate the ways in which knowledge management and athletic achievement can intersect and influence one another. The implications of this revelation may reach even further than we initially anticipated, and we look forward to future research that delves into the deep "catalog" of potential insights that may arise from such unexpected intersections.
In conclusion, our findings highlight the immeasurable value of exploring unexpected connections, as they often lead to invaluable insights and unexpected comedic relief, whether on the baseball field or within the hallowed halls of the library.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has brought to light the remarkable correlation between the number of Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the wins of the Cincinnati Reds. Our findings reveal a correlation coefficient of 0.8202952 and an r-squared of 0.6728843, highlighting the substantial relationship between seemingly disparate realms of knowledge. It seems that while librarians excel at organizing information, they might just have a knack for organizing wins for the Reds as well. Who would have thought that Dewey Decimals and baseball decimals could ever be related?

It's as if the librarian is the "sine qua non" of the Reds' success, guiding them with the precision of a well-crafted algorithm.

This unexpected revelation prompts us to ponder the delightful and comedic ways in which seemingly unusual associations can lead to profound insights, both in the world of statistics and the diamond. Our study showcases the mirthful potential of scholarly inquiry and its ability to lead us down uncharted paths of discovery - reminding us that even the most serious of pursuits can yield unexpected moments of levity.

In light of our robust findings and the statistical significance of this relationship, we assert that no more research is needed in this area. However, we do encourage future explorations into other unconventional connections, as they often offer surprising and amusing revelations that enrich our understanding of the world.

After all, a good laugh is just as important as a good correlation coefficient.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Dewey Decimal Derby: Exploring the Relationship between Library Science Master's Degrees and Cincinnati Reds Wins. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Bibliographic Baseball Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Dewey Decimal Derby: Exploring the Relationship between Library Science Master's Degrees and Cincinnati Reds Wins. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Society for the Advancement of Synchronized Napping and Knowledge Management


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Dewey Decimal Derby: Exploring the Relationship between Library Science Master's Degrees and Cincinnati Reds Wins with an abstract of In this paper, we embark on a bibliographic journey to unravel an unexpected connection between Master's degrees awarded in Library science and the on-field performance of the Cincinnati Reds. Using data from the National Center for Education Statistics and Baseball-Reference.com, we meticulously examined the correlation between these seemingly unrelated variables for the period 2012 to 2021. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8202952 and p < 0.01, signifying a robust relationship between the two. This leads us to conclude that while "silence is golden," a good librarian might just bring home the gold for the Reds.
On a related note, did you hear about the librarian who won the baseball game? She really knows how to "pitch" the right information, both in the library and on the mound!
Furthermore, we delve into the implications of our findings for both the field of library science and the sports industry. This unexpected connection prompts us to ponder the intriguing ways in which seemingly disparate domains may intersect. Our study sheds light on the potential impact of knowledge management on athletic achievement, and perhaps even on the "book on baseball." We encourage further examination of unconventional associations, as they often unveil valuable insights and, in this case, keep us "in the know" about baseball and libraries.
Speaking of which, isn't it a little bit like a library when the team's pitcher is on fire? All you can hear are "strikes" and "shhh's.

ChatGPT:

library science master's degrees, Cincinnati Reds wins, correlation, National Center for Education Statistics, Baseball-Reference.com, relationship between library science and baseball, knowledge management, athletics and education, unconventional associations, impact of education on sports industry

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Master's degrees awarded in Library science
Detailed data title: Master's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions in Library science
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Master's degrees awarded in Library science

Wins for the Cincinnati Reds
Detailed data title: The season win/loss ratio for the Cincinnati Reds
Source: Baseball-Reference.com
See what else correlates with Wins for the Cincinnati Reds

Correlation r = 0.8202952 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6728843 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 67.3% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Wins for the Cincinnati Reds) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Master's degrees awarded in Library science) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.0037. 0.0036505101289111410000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.82 in 0.37% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 274 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.39, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Master's degrees awarded in Library science (Degrees awarded)7443698358405259492648434953516449595473
Wins for the Cincinnati Reds (Win/Loss Ratio)0.5990.5560.4690.3950.420.420.4140.4630.5170.512




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([7443,6983,5840,5259,4926,4843,4953,5164,4959,5473,])
array_2 = np.array([0.599,0.556,0.469,0.395,0.42,0.42,0.414,0.463,0.517,0.512,])
array_1_name = "Master's degrees awarded in Library science"
array_2_name = "Wins for the Cincinnati Reds"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your dedication to rating warms my heart!


Correlation ID: 2761 · Black Variable ID: 1329 · Red Variable ID: 4329
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0