about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,757 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Texas and the second variable is Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2023, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The GMO corn in Texas started producing kernels in the shape of maple leaves, sparking a strong desire for poutine and maple syrup among the local population. Looks like Texas corn is creating some cornfusion about Canadian cuisine!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image that captures the humorous contrast of a vast Texas cornfield running for miles, layered with rows of genetically modified corn plants stretching as far as the eye can see. In a separate scene, depict computer screens across the state inundated with a surge of Google searches for "how to immigrate to Canada." This juxtaposition of the thriving GMO cornfield and the online quest for immigration information highlights the contrasting desires for a safe and healthy environment. Emphasize the visual impact of the endless cornfield and the digital screens filling up with immigration-related searches, creating a whimsical and lighthearted image befitting of a popular Reddit post. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic Cute 2D animation Whimsical illustration a funny image you would see on reddit Scalar art
ChatGPT: a funny image you would see on reddit

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada', in the following situation: As GMO corn production increased in Texas, it led to a "corny" situation. People started searching for "how to immigrate to Canada" to escape the "ear-responsible" consequences of GMO consumption, hoping to find a "kernel" of safety in the land of maple syrup and "eh"-mazing healthcare.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast Texas cornfield, rows of genetically modified corn stretch as far as the eye can see. Meanwhile, on computer screens across the state, a surge of Google searches for "how to immigrate to Canada" fills the screen, as people seek an escape from the "corny" situation. The juxtaposition of the thriving GMO cornfield and the online quest for immigration information paints a picture of contrasting desires for a safe and healthy environment.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image you would see on reddit ] and depicting this scene: In a vast Texas cornfield, rows of genetically modified corn stretch as far as the eye can see. Meanwhile, on computer screens across the state, a surge of Google searches for "how to immigrate to Canada" fills the screen, as people seek an escape from the "corny" situation. The juxtaposition of the thriving GMO cornfield and the online quest for immigration information paints a picture of contrasting desires for a safe and healthy environment. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image that captures the humorous contrast of a vast Texas cornfield running for miles, layered with rows of genetically modified corn plants stretching as far as the eye can see. In a separate scene, depict computer screens across the state inundated with a surge of Google searches for "how to immigrate to Canada." This juxtaposition of the thriving GMO cornfield and the online quest for immigration information highlights the contrasting desires for a safe and healthy environment. Emphasize the visual impact of the endless cornfield and the digital screens filling up with immigration-related searches, creating a whimsical and lighthearted image befitting of a popular Reddit post.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in Texas caused how to immigrate to canada (Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada') to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Stalkin' GMOs: Unveiling the Corn-y Connection Between GMO Use in Texas and the Urge to 'How to Immigrate to Canada'

The Journal of Agricultural Anecdotes

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8424541 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2023.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalkin' GMOs: Unveiling the Corn-y Connection Between GMO Use in Texas and the Urge to 'How to Immigrate to Canada'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada'. Our research utilizes USDA and Google Trends data from 2005 to 2023 to shed light on this unusual correlation. We perform statistical analysis, revealing a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8424541 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, providing evidence of a strong association between these two seemingly disparate phenomena.

Upon peeling back the layers of our findings, we dig into the underlying factors that may explain this intriguing relationship, considering both economic and social implications. It appears that as the use of GMOs in corn production grows, so does the curiosity about migrating to the land of maple syrup and politeness. Perhaps this correlation reflects broader societal trends, or perhaps it's simply the outcome of a-maize-ing coincidence.

Our research offers a kernel of insight into the curious connection between agricultural practices and aspirational destination searches, while also providing fodder for future investigation of the interplay between food production and migration aspirations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalkin' GMOs: Unveiling the Corn-y Connection Between GMO Use in Texas and the Urge to 'How to Immigrate to Canada'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada'. Our research utilizes USDA and Google Trends data from 2005 to 2023 to shed light on this unusual correlation. We perform statistical analysis, revealing a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8424541 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, providing evidence of a strong association between these two seemingly disparate phenomena.

Upon peeling back the layers of our findings, we dig into the underlying factors that may explain this intriguing relationship, considering both economic and social implications. It appears that as the use of GMOs in corn production grows, so does the curiosity about migrating to the land of maple syrup and politeness. Perhaps this correlation reflects broader societal trends, or perhaps it's simply the outcome of a-maize-ing coincidence.

Our research offers a kernel of insight into the curious connection between agricultural practices and aspirational destination searches, while also providing fodder for future investigation of the interplay between food production and migration aspirations.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has garnered substantial attention and debate in the agricultural sphere. While researchers have extensively analyzed their impact on crop yields, pesticide use, and farmer profits, a truly ear-resistible curiosity remains: do GMOs in corn cultivation hold a kernel of connection with the search for information on immigrating to Canada? This paper aims to peel back the husk of this intriguing question and shed light on the potential relationship between the adoption of GMOs in Texas cornfields and the online yearning for a maple leaf adventure.

As we embark on this stalk-tastic journey of exploration, it is essential to substantiate the significance of investigating this corn-y connection. The popularity of Google searches querying "how to immigrate to Canada", coupled with the widespread adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation, has sprouted a curiosity that demands attention. It begs the question: are there underlying factors at play, or is this simply the result of some cob-founding coincidence?

Like two ears of corn side by side, the relationship between GMO use in Texas and the inclination to immigrate to Canada may seem to be unrelated. However, as we dig deeper into the data, we may uncover the root of this enigma and peel back the layers of this "ear-regular" association.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalkin' GMOs: Unveiling the Corn-y Connection Between GMO Use in Texas and the Urge to 'How to Immigrate to Canada'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada'. Our research utilizes USDA and Google Trends data from 2005 to 2023 to shed light on this unusual correlation. We perform statistical analysis, revealing a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8424541 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, providing evidence of a strong association between these two seemingly disparate phenomena.

Upon peeling back the layers of our findings, we dig into the underlying factors that may explain this intriguing relationship, considering both economic and social implications. It appears that as the use of GMOs in corn production grows, so does the curiosity about migrating to the land of maple syrup and politeness. Perhaps this correlation reflects broader societal trends, or perhaps it's simply the outcome of a-maize-ing coincidence.

Our research offers a kernel of insight into the curious connection between agricultural practices and aspirational destination searches, while also providing fodder for future investigation of the interplay between food production and migration aspirations.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has garnered substantial attention and debate in the agricultural sphere. While researchers have extensively analyzed their impact on crop yields, pesticide use, and farmer profits, a truly ear-resistible curiosity remains: do GMOs in corn cultivation hold a kernel of connection with the search for information on immigrating to Canada? This paper aims to peel back the husk of this intriguing question and shed light on the potential relationship between the adoption of GMOs in Texas cornfields and the online yearning for a maple leaf adventure.
As we embark on this stalk-tastic journey of exploration, it is essential to substantiate the significance of investigating this corn-y connection. The popularity of Google searches querying "how to immigrate to Canada", coupled with the widespread adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation, has sprouted a curiosity that demands attention. It begs the question: are there underlying factors at play, or is this simply the result of some cob-founding coincidence?
Like two ears of corn side by side, the relationship between GMO use in Texas and the inclination to immigrate to Canada may seem to be unrelated. However, as we dig deeper into the data, we may uncover the root of this enigma and peel back the layers of this "ear-regular" association.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith and Doe (2015) examine the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the state of Texas, focusing on the impact of GMO use on crop productivity and pest resistance. The authors find a statistically significant increase in corn yield and a reduction in pesticide applications following the adoption of GMOs in Texas cornfields. Similarly, Jones et al. (2018) investigate the economic implications of GMO adoption, highlighting the potential cost savings for farmers and the overall positive impact on agricultural productivity.

In "GMOs and Immigration: Unveiling the Corn-y Connection," Lorem and Ipsum (2020) delve into the potential association between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada.' Their analysis reveals a surprisingly high correlation between the two variables, sparking curiosity about the underlying factors driving this unexpected relationship.

As we delve into the cornucopia of literature related to this peculiar correlation, it is important to consider the broader societal and economic contexts. "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan delves into the complex web of food production and its impact on consumer choices, shedding light on the myriad factors that influence our dietary and agricultural behaviors. In a somewhat corny parallel, "Corn: A Global History" by Sarah Earle explores the cultural and economic significance of corn, emphasizing its role as a staple crop and its pervasive influence on human societies throughout history.

Furthermore, works of fiction such as "Station Eleven" by Emily St. John Mandel and "The Handmaid's Tale" by Margaret Atwood offer dystopian perspectives on societal upheaval and migration, echoing the theme of seeking refuge in foreign lands. Perhaps these fictional narratives contain kernels of truth that resonate with the real-world phenomenon of seeking information on immigrating to Canada as GMO usage in corn cultivation rises.

In an unexpected turn, a social media post by a user going by the pseudonym "CornMaster99" humorously quips, "Looks like we need to 'stalk' up on GMOs if we want a ticket to Canada! #CornToCanada." While seemingly lighthearted, such posts hint at the underlying curiosity and speculation surrounding the potential link between GMO use in corn and the allure of Canadian immigration.

Thus, the existing literature presents a rich tapestry of perspectives on the interplay between GMO adoption in corn cultivation, immigration aspirations, and broader societal implications. As we sow the seeds of our investigation, it becomes evident that this peculiar correlation is not just a-maize-ing, but also warrants further examination to uncover its root causes and implications.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends . You used data from 2005 to 2023

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalkin' GMOs: Unveiling the Corn-y Connection Between GMO Use in Texas and the Urge to 'How to Immigrate to Canada'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada'. Our research utilizes USDA and Google Trends data from 2005 to 2023 to shed light on this unusual correlation. We perform statistical analysis, revealing a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8424541 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, providing evidence of a strong association between these two seemingly disparate phenomena.

Upon peeling back the layers of our findings, we dig into the underlying factors that may explain this intriguing relationship, considering both economic and social implications. It appears that as the use of GMOs in corn production grows, so does the curiosity about migrating to the land of maple syrup and politeness. Perhaps this correlation reflects broader societal trends, or perhaps it's simply the outcome of a-maize-ing coincidence.

Our research offers a kernel of insight into the curious connection between agricultural practices and aspirational destination searches, while also providing fodder for future investigation of the interplay between food production and migration aspirations.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has garnered substantial attention and debate in the agricultural sphere. While researchers have extensively analyzed their impact on crop yields, pesticide use, and farmer profits, a truly ear-resistible curiosity remains: do GMOs in corn cultivation hold a kernel of connection with the search for information on immigrating to Canada? This paper aims to peel back the husk of this intriguing question and shed light on the potential relationship between the adoption of GMOs in Texas cornfields and the online yearning for a maple leaf adventure.
As we embark on this stalk-tastic journey of exploration, it is essential to substantiate the significance of investigating this corn-y connection. The popularity of Google searches querying "how to immigrate to Canada", coupled with the widespread adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation, has sprouted a curiosity that demands attention. It begs the question: are there underlying factors at play, or is this simply the result of some cob-founding coincidence?
Like two ears of corn side by side, the relationship between GMO use in Texas and the inclination to immigrate to Canada may seem to be unrelated. However, as we dig deeper into the data, we may uncover the root of this enigma and peel back the layers of this "ear-regular" association.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the tantalizing correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada', a multidisciplinary approach was employed. This involved gathering data from multiple sources including the USDA and Google Trends, and utilizing a series of analytical methods that were as carefully selected as the choicest kernels of corn.

First, a comprehensive analysis of USDA data spanning the years 2005 to 2023 was conducted to ascertain the extent of GMO adoption in corn cultivation in Texas. This involved scrutinizing reports, publications, and databases in order to cob-duct a thorough examination of the prevalence of GMO usage and its evolution over time. The data was shucked, cleaned, and organized with the precision of a skilled harvester navigating a cornfield.

In parallel, Google Trends data for the same time period was harvested to quantify the frequency of searches related to 'how to immigrate to Canada'. The relative 'stalk-ing' behavior exhibited in these searches was then contrasted with the GMO adoption trends to discern any discernible patterns or correlations.

Next, statistical analyses were applied to the compiled datasets, employing methods that were as robust as the sturdiest corn stalk. Correlation coefficients were computed to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship between GMO use and 'how to immigrate to Canada' searches. Additionally, time series analysis was undertaken to reveal any temporal patterns or seasonal fluctuations in the data, unveiling the ebb and flow of this intriguing agricultural-migration nexus.

Furthermore, a regression analysis was conducted to control for potential confounding variables such as economic indicators and societal trends, helping to ensure the robustness of the observed relationship. This allowed for the isolation of the effect of GMO use on the proclivity to seek information on immigration to Canada, demonstrating a depth of analysis as deep as the root system of a Texas cornfield.

Ultimately, the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation in Texas was found to exhibit a striking positive correlation with the frequency of searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada', with a statistically significant relationship emerging from the husk of data under examination. This provides evidence of a connection that may be as corn-troversial as it is compelling, offering a fresh perspective through which to examine the interplay between agricultural practices and migration aspirations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Google Trends .

For the time period 2005 to 2023, you found a correlation 0.8424541, r-squared of 0.7097289, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalkin' GMOs: Unveiling the Corn-y Connection Between GMO Use in Texas and the Urge to 'How to Immigrate to Canada'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada'. Our research utilizes USDA and Google Trends data from 2005 to 2023 to shed light on this unusual correlation. We perform statistical analysis, revealing a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8424541 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, providing evidence of a strong association between these two seemingly disparate phenomena.

Upon peeling back the layers of our findings, we dig into the underlying factors that may explain this intriguing relationship, considering both economic and social implications. It appears that as the use of GMOs in corn production grows, so does the curiosity about migrating to the land of maple syrup and politeness. Perhaps this correlation reflects broader societal trends, or perhaps it's simply the outcome of a-maize-ing coincidence.

Our research offers a kernel of insight into the curious connection between agricultural practices and aspirational destination searches, while also providing fodder for future investigation of the interplay between food production and migration aspirations.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has garnered substantial attention and debate in the agricultural sphere. While researchers have extensively analyzed their impact on crop yields, pesticide use, and farmer profits, a truly ear-resistible curiosity remains: do GMOs in corn cultivation hold a kernel of connection with the search for information on immigrating to Canada? This paper aims to peel back the husk of this intriguing question and shed light on the potential relationship between the adoption of GMOs in Texas cornfields and the online yearning for a maple leaf adventure.
As we embark on this stalk-tastic journey of exploration, it is essential to substantiate the significance of investigating this corn-y connection. The popularity of Google searches querying "how to immigrate to Canada", coupled with the widespread adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation, has sprouted a curiosity that demands attention. It begs the question: are there underlying factors at play, or is this simply the result of some cob-founding coincidence?
Like two ears of corn side by side, the relationship between GMO use in Texas and the inclination to immigrate to Canada may seem to be unrelated. However, as we dig deeper into the data, we may uncover the root of this enigma and peel back the layers of this "ear-regular" association.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation reveal a striking correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada'. The correlation coefficient of 0.8424541 suggests a strong positive relationship between these two variables. This finding indicates that as the use of GMOs in corn production increased, so did the frequency of Google searches related to migrating to Canada. It seems that the more corn grows, the stronger the pull toward the land of poutine and hockey.

The r-squared value of 0.7097289 underscores the strength of this association, explaining approximately 71% of the variation in searches for information on immigration to Canada based on the adoption of GMOs in Texas. This implies that the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation in Texas can account for a substantial portion of the variance in Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada'. It's as if the GMOs are whispering, "eh, come join us" to potential migrants.

Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence that this correlation is statistically significant. This indicates that the observed relationship between GMO use in Texas cornfields and the inclination to search for information on immigrating to Canada is unlikely to be due to random chance. In other words, this correlation is as statistically significant as the difference between red and white corn – it's not just a-maize-ing coincidence.

Our results are visually represented in Figure 1, which depicts a scatterplot illustrating the positive correlation between GMO use in corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada'. The data points align with the trend line, demonstrably showcasing the tight bond between these two variables. It's as though the corn and Canadian dreams are in perfect earmony.

In summary, our research provides compelling evidence of a strong association between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada'. This revelation raises more questions than it answers and invites further investigation into the underlying reasons for this unexpected correlation. It seems that the relationship between GMO use and immigration aspirations is a-maize-ing in more ways than one.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Stalkin' GMOs: Unveiling the Corn-y Connection Between GMO Use in Texas and the Urge to 'How to Immigrate to Canada'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada'. Our research utilizes USDA and Google Trends data from 2005 to 2023 to shed light on this unusual correlation. We perform statistical analysis, revealing a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8424541 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, providing evidence of a strong association between these two seemingly disparate phenomena.

Upon peeling back the layers of our findings, we dig into the underlying factors that may explain this intriguing relationship, considering both economic and social implications. It appears that as the use of GMOs in corn production grows, so does the curiosity about migrating to the land of maple syrup and politeness. Perhaps this correlation reflects broader societal trends, or perhaps it's simply the outcome of a-maize-ing coincidence.

Our research offers a kernel of insight into the curious connection between agricultural practices and aspirational destination searches, while also providing fodder for future investigation of the interplay between food production and migration aspirations.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith and Doe (2015) examine the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in the state of Texas, focusing on the impact of GMO use on crop productivity and pest resistance. The authors find a statistically significant increase in corn yield and a reduction in pesticide applications following the adoption of GMOs in Texas cornfields. Similarly, Jones et al. (2018) investigate the economic implications of GMO adoption, highlighting the potential cost savings for farmers and the overall positive impact on agricultural productivity.
In "GMOs and Immigration: Unveiling the Corn-y Connection," Lorem and Ipsum (2020) delve into the potential association between the use of GMOs in corn grown in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada.' Their analysis reveals a surprisingly high correlation between the two variables, sparking curiosity about the underlying factors driving this unexpected relationship.
As we delve into the cornucopia of literature related to this peculiar correlation, it is important to consider the broader societal and economic contexts. "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan delves into the complex web of food production and its impact on consumer choices, shedding light on the myriad factors that influence our dietary and agricultural behaviors. In a somewhat corny parallel, "Corn: A Global History" by Sarah Earle explores the cultural and economic significance of corn, emphasizing its role as a staple crop and its pervasive influence on human societies throughout history.
Furthermore, works of fiction such as "Station Eleven" by Emily St. John Mandel and "The Handmaid's Tale" by Margaret Atwood offer dystopian perspectives on societal upheaval and migration, echoing the theme of seeking refuge in foreign lands. Perhaps these fictional narratives contain kernels of truth that resonate with the real-world phenomenon of seeking information on immigrating to Canada as GMO usage in corn cultivation rises.
In an unexpected turn, a social media post by a user going by the pseudonym "CornMaster99" humorously quips, "Looks like we need to 'stalk' up on GMOs if we want a ticket to Canada! #CornToCanada." While seemingly lighthearted, such posts hint at the underlying curiosity and speculation surrounding the potential link between GMO use in corn and the allure of Canadian immigration.
Thus, the existing literature presents a rich tapestry of perspectives on the interplay between GMO adoption in corn cultivation, immigration aspirations, and broader societal implications. As we sow the seeds of our investigation, it becomes evident that this peculiar correlation is not just a-maize-ing, but also warrants further examination to uncover its root causes and implications.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation reveal a striking correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada'. The correlation coefficient of 0.8424541 suggests a strong positive relationship between these two variables. This finding indicates that as the use of GMOs in corn production increased, so did the frequency of Google searches related to migrating to Canada. It seems that the more corn grows, the stronger the pull toward the land of poutine and hockey.
The r-squared value of 0.7097289 underscores the strength of this association, explaining approximately 71% of the variation in searches for information on immigration to Canada based on the adoption of GMOs in Texas. This implies that the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation in Texas can account for a substantial portion of the variance in Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada'. It's as if the GMOs are whispering, "eh, come join us" to potential migrants.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence that this correlation is statistically significant. This indicates that the observed relationship between GMO use in Texas cornfields and the inclination to search for information on immigrating to Canada is unlikely to be due to random chance. In other words, this correlation is as statistically significant as the difference between red and white corn – it's not just a-maize-ing coincidence.
Our results are visually represented in Figure 1, which depicts a scatterplot illustrating the positive correlation between GMO use in corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada'. The data points align with the trend line, demonstrably showcasing the tight bond between these two variables. It's as though the corn and Canadian dreams are in perfect earmony.
In summary, our research provides compelling evidence of a strong association between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada'. This revelation raises more questions than it answers and invites further investigation into the underlying reasons for this unexpected correlation. It seems that the relationship between GMO use and immigration aspirations is a-maize-ing in more ways than one.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings provide robust support for the prior research on the impact of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Texas and their curious intersection with the frequency of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada'. The strong correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value confirm the a-maize-ing connection between these seemingly unrelated variables. It appears that as GMOs take root in Texas cornfields, the allure of Canada grows, as if drawn by some magnetic attraction – or perhaps a syrupy, irresistible force.

In line with the insights of Smith and Doe (2015) and Jones et al. (2018), who elucidate the agricultural and economic implications of GMO adoption, our research amplifies the relevance of GMO use in influencing broader societal trends. It seems that the burgeoning curiosity about immigrating to Canada is not just a kernel of truth, but a cobweb of intertwined factors shaped by the agricultural landscape. As Pollan and Earle discuss, food production and its cultural significance extend beyond sustenance, intertwining with human behavior in unexpected ways, much like the tendrils of a climbing corn plant.

Our investigation sheds light on the need to peel back the layers of this peculiar correlation to reveal the root causes driving this phenomenon, much like shucking a corn husk to reveal the hidden kernels within. The a-maize-ing coincidence of GMO use in Texas and Canadian immigration queries raises questions about the cultural, economic, and psychological factors at play. It seems that this interplay between agricultural practices and migration aspirations is not just meant to be husked off lightly – it holds the potential for deeper insights into human behavior and societal preferences.

Moreover, our results corroborate seemingly whimsical tidbits from the literature review, such as the social media post by "CornMaster99", which, though lighthearted, hints at the widespread curiosity and speculation surrounding the interconnection between GMOs and Canadian dreams. It appears that this curious connection is not just a kernel of jest, but a popping corn of unforeseen revelations, bursting forth with implications for both the agricultural and migratory landscapes.

In conclusion, our research unravels the enigmatic bond between GMO use in Texas cornfields and the inquisitiveness about immigrating to Canada, accentuating the surprising interdependence among seemingly disparate phenomena. This 'ear-resistible' connection prompts further exploration – not just of how GMOs and immigration aspirations intertwine, but of the broader implications for human behavior and societal trends. After all, perhaps the grass – or in this case, the corn – is always greener on the other side, prompting a-maize-ing inquiries into the cyclical connections between food production and global aspirations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Stalkin' GMOs: Unveiling the Corn-y Connection Between GMO Use in Texas and the Urge to 'How to Immigrate to Canada'"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper examines the intriguing relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada'. Our research utilizes USDA and Google Trends data from 2005 to 2023 to shed light on this unusual correlation. We perform statistical analysis, revealing a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8424541 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, providing evidence of a strong association between these two seemingly disparate phenomena.

Upon peeling back the layers of our findings, we dig into the underlying factors that may explain this intriguing relationship, considering both economic and social implications. It appears that as the use of GMOs in corn production grows, so does the curiosity about migrating to the land of maple syrup and politeness. Perhaps this correlation reflects broader societal trends, or perhaps it's simply the outcome of a-maize-ing coincidence.

Our research offers a kernel of insight into the curious connection between agricultural practices and aspirational destination searches, while also providing fodder for future investigation of the interplay between food production and migration aspirations.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) has garnered substantial attention and debate in the agricultural sphere. While researchers have extensively analyzed their impact on crop yields, pesticide use, and farmer profits, a truly ear-resistible curiosity remains: do GMOs in corn cultivation hold a kernel of connection with the search for information on immigrating to Canada? This paper aims to peel back the husk of this intriguing question and shed light on the potential relationship between the adoption of GMOs in Texas cornfields and the online yearning for a maple leaf adventure.
As we embark on this stalk-tastic journey of exploration, it is essential to substantiate the significance of investigating this corn-y connection. The popularity of Google searches querying "how to immigrate to Canada", coupled with the widespread adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation, has sprouted a curiosity that demands attention. It begs the question: are there underlying factors at play, or is this simply the result of some cob-founding coincidence?
Like two ears of corn side by side, the relationship between GMO use in Texas and the inclination to immigrate to Canada may seem to be unrelated. However, as we dig deeper into the data, we may uncover the root of this enigma and peel back the layers of this "ear-regular" association.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation reveal a striking correlation between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada'. The correlation coefficient of 0.8424541 suggests a strong positive relationship between these two variables. This finding indicates that as the use of GMOs in corn production increased, so did the frequency of Google searches related to migrating to Canada. It seems that the more corn grows, the stronger the pull toward the land of poutine and hockey.
The r-squared value of 0.7097289 underscores the strength of this association, explaining approximately 71% of the variation in searches for information on immigration to Canada based on the adoption of GMOs in Texas. This implies that the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation in Texas can account for a substantial portion of the variance in Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada'. It's as if the GMOs are whispering, "eh, come join us" to potential migrants.
Furthermore, the p-value of less than 0.01 provides strong evidence that this correlation is statistically significant. This indicates that the observed relationship between GMO use in Texas cornfields and the inclination to search for information on immigrating to Canada is unlikely to be due to random chance. In other words, this correlation is as statistically significant as the difference between red and white corn – it's not just a-maize-ing coincidence.
Our results are visually represented in Figure 1, which depicts a scatterplot illustrating the positive correlation between GMO use in corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada'. The data points align with the trend line, demonstrably showcasing the tight bond between these two variables. It's as though the corn and Canadian dreams are in perfect earmony.
In summary, our research provides compelling evidence of a strong association between the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada'. This revelation raises more questions than it answers and invites further investigation into the underlying reasons for this unexpected correlation. It seems that the relationship between GMO use and immigration aspirations is a-maize-ing in more ways than one.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has unearthed a kernel of insight into the fascinating connection between GMO use in Texas cornfields and the allure of immigrating to Canada. The statistically significant correlation we uncovered pricks the curiosity, much like a corn cob wedged in one's teeth after a backyard barbecue. Our findings suggest that as the adoption of GMOs in corn cultivation grows, so does the interest in seeking refuge in the land of 'aboot' and apologies.

Our results yield more than mere corn-jecture; they raise significant questions about the underlying factors at play. Could it be that the GMOs are secretly whispering immigration advice to Canadians in waiting? Or does this correlation reflect a broader societal trend, much like a seedling ready to sprout into a full-blown phenomenon? It's as intriguing as the age-old question: why did the scarecrow win an award? Because he was outstanding in his field!

This research opens the door to a-maize-ing possibilities for future exploration of the relationship between agricultural practices and migration aspirations. However, it seems that for now, we have peeled back the husk of this corn-y connection and exposed its cob-stituents.

Given the ear-regular nature of our findings, it is evident that further research in this area may yield limited added value and might only serve to corn-fuse matters. Therefore, it is our scholarly recommendation that no further research is needed in this particular field – the mystery of the GMO-corn and Canada immigration connection has been husked and de-corn-structed to the best of our ability.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Stalkin' GMOs: Unveiling the Corn-y Connection Between GMO Use in Texas and the Urge to 'How to Immigrate to Canada'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Anecdotes


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Stalkin' GMOs: Unveiling the Corn-y Connection Between GMO Use in Texas and the Urge to 'How to Immigrate to Canada'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Sustainable Agriculture and Genetic Inquiry


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Stalkin' GMOs: Unveiling the Corn-y Connection Between GMO Use in Texas and the Urge to 'How to Immigrate to Canada' with an abstract of This paper examines the intriguing relationship between the adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Texas and the frequency of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to Canada'. Our research utilizes USDA and Google Trends data from 2005 to 2023 to shed light on this unusual correlation. We perform statistical analysis, revealing a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.8424541 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01, providing evidence of a strong association between these two seemingly disparate phenomena.
Upon peeling back the layers of our findings, we dig into the underlying factors that may explain this intriguing relationship, considering both economic and social implications. It appears that as the use of GMOs in corn production grows, so does the curiosity about migrating to the land of maple syrup and politeness. Perhaps this correlation reflects broader societal trends, or perhaps it's simply the outcome of a-maize-ing coincidence.
Our research offers a kernel of insight into the curious connection between agricultural practices and aspirational destination searches, while also providing fodder for future investigation of the interplay between food production and migration aspirations.

ChatGPT:

GMOs, corn cultivation, Texas, Google Trends data, USDA, correlation analysis, immigration searches, Canada, statistical analysis, economic implications, social implications, societal trends, migration aspirations, food production

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Texas
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Texas that is genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Texas

Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'

Correlation r = 0.8424541 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7097289 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 71% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Texas) over the 19 years from 2005 through 2023.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 6.02E-6. 0.0000060211844135449015000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.84 in 0.000602% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 166,080 random variables You don't actually need 166 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.63, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017201820192020202120222023
GMO use in corn grown in Texas (GMO corn %)72777978848588858991899095939592929295
Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada' (Rel. search volume)19.083310.33339.7515.517.916720.416721.916719.7523.583325.7522.083331.2528.83333232.166735.583329.833333.666729.5




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([72,77,79,78,84,85,88,85,89,91,89,90,95,93,95,92,92,92,95,])
array_2 = np.array([19.0833,10.3333,9.75,15.5,17.9167,20.4167,21.9167,19.75,23.5833,25.75,22.0833,31.25,28.8333,32,32.1667,35.5833,29.8333,33.6667,29.5,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Texas"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'how to immigrate to canada'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Thanks for shining a light on this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2757 · Black Variable ID: 764 · Red Variable ID: 1349
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0