about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,719 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and the second variable is Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale.  The chart goes from 2002 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As farmers reduced the use of GMOs in Michigan corn, they inadvertently decreased the production of a substance that had been unknowingly wafting through the air and subtly influencing people's TV preferences. This substance, dubbed "corny-ness factor," was found to have a direct link to increased viewership of American Idol. Without the GMOs, the corn lost its pop culture appeal, leading to a nationwide disinterest in the Season Finale. It seems the corn really was the ear-resistible secret behind the show's success.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: In a serene Michigan cornfield, a patch of non-GMO corn flourishes, swaying gracefully in the breeze. Nearby, a small group of people sit around a rustic wooden table, enjoying freshly grilled corn on the cob. Laughter and conversation fill the air as the sun sets behind them, casting a warm glow over the scene. The cornfield stretches out into the distance, creating a peaceful backdrop for the gathering. In the distance, a television set displays the American Idol Season Finale, but the low viewership is evident as the individuals are immersed in each other's company, savoring the authentic taste of the moment. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Hyper-realistic Minimalism Steampunk Brutalism High-tech
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale, in the following situation: Because less GMO corn leads to more authentic corn, and authentic corn makes people more discerning, they became less likely to watch American Idol, seeking more genuine entertainment elsewhere.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a tranquil Michigan cornfield, a patch of non-GMO corn grows tall and vibrant, swaying gently in the breeze. Nearby, a small group of people gather around a rustic wooden table, chatting and laughing as they savor fresh corn on the cob, enjoying the authentic taste. In the background, a television set shows the American Idol Season Finale, but the viewership count appears to be low as the individuals seem more engaged in each other's company, seeking genuine connections and entertainment amidst the beauty of the natural setting.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In a tranquil Michigan cornfield, a patch of non-GMO corn grows tall and vibrant, swaying gently in the breeze. Nearby, a small group of people gather around a rustic wooden table, chatting and laughing as they savor fresh corn on the cob, enjoying the authentic taste. In the background, a television set shows the American Idol Season Finale, but the viewership count appears to be low as the individuals seem more engaged in each other's company, seeking genuine connections and entertainment amidst the beauty of the natural setting. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: In a serene Michigan cornfield, a patch of non-GMO corn flourishes, swaying gracefully in the breeze. Nearby, a small group of people sit around a rustic wooden table, enjoying freshly grilled corn on the cob. Laughter and conversation fill the air as the sun sets behind them, casting a warm glow over the scene. The cornfield stretches out into the distance, creating a peaceful backdrop for the gathering. In the distance, a television set displays the American Idol Season Finale, but the low viewership is evident as the individuals are immersed in each other's company, savoring the authentic taste of the moment.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in GMO use in corn grown in Michigan caused Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale to decrease.\Make it sound serious until the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Corn Yields and American Idol Fields: A Genetically Modified Connection?

The Journal of Agricultural Genetics and Pop Culture Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from USDA and Wikipedia to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9620257 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Corn Yields and American Idol Fields: A Genetically Modified Connection?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unexpected and possibly unorthodox connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Michigan and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. Our research team meticulously combed through data from the USDA to analyze corn yields in Michigan, while simultaneously drawing from the depths of Wikipedia to assess the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. To our surprise, we uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9620257 and p < 0.01 between the two seemingly disparate variables for the years 2002 to 2022. While we expected to find mere husks of evidence linking these phenomena, our findings suggest a rather corny connection between crop biotechnology and pop culture. Our research leaves us pondering whether GMO corn has been quietly crooning its way into the hearts of American TV audiences, or if American Idol has surreptitiously influenced corn yield trends. We invite fellow researchers to join us in exploring this uncharted territory where the fields of agriculture and entertainment intersect.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Corn Yields and American Idol Fields: A Genetically Modified Connection?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unexpected and possibly unorthodox connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Michigan and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. Our research team meticulously combed through data from the USDA to analyze corn yields in Michigan, while simultaneously drawing from the depths of Wikipedia to assess the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. To our surprise, we uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9620257 and p < 0.01 between the two seemingly disparate variables for the years 2002 to 2022. While we expected to find mere husks of evidence linking these phenomena, our findings suggest a rather corny connection between crop biotechnology and pop culture. Our research leaves us pondering whether GMO corn has been quietly crooning its way into the hearts of American TV audiences, or if American Idol has surreptitiously influenced corn yield trends. We invite fellow researchers to join us in exploring this uncharted territory where the fields of agriculture and entertainment intersect.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of agriculture and popular culture has often been overlooked in academic research, with most scholars tending to focus on more traditional and less glamorous topics. However, in the words of William Shakespeare, "Though she be but little, she is fierce." In this case, the seemingly innocuous cornfields of Michigan and the glitzy, high-energy world of American Idol intertwine in a way that challenges traditional academic boundaries and tickles the fancy of our intellectual curiosity.

As we delve into this peculiar connection, we cannot help but marvel at the sheer serendipity of stumbling upon a correlation between GMO corn production and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. It is a tale as old as time - the story of genetically modified organisms infiltrating the agricultural landscape and a television program captivating audiences across the nation. One might say it has all the makings of a blockbuster Hollywood rom-com, but instead of star-crossed lovers, we are presented with star-crossed variables.

The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in crop production has been a topic of intense debate and scrutiny. Critics have expressed concerns about the potential health and environmental impacts, while proponents have touted the benefits of increased yields and pest resistance. Meanwhile, the American Idol phenomenon has enthralled audiences with its spectacle of raw talent, tear-jerking performances, and the occasional judging panel drama. Who could have foreseen that these two seemingly disparate worlds would collide in such a statistically significant manner?

Our journey into this unexplored territory has led us to question the very fabric of our understanding of agriculture and entertainment. Are we witnessing a phenomenon where GMO corn, with its genetically engineered traits, is silently serenading TV audiences, captivating them with its yields just as much as its musical talents? Or could it be that American Idol, with its mesmerizing allure, has covertly influenced the trends in corn production, compelling farmers to plant the seeds of change in their fields?

In the age-old tradition of academic inquiry, we have set out to unpack these mysteries and shed light on this curious correlation. Our findings not only challenge preconceived notions about the realm of agricultural biotechnology and popular TV programming but also invite us to embrace the unexpected and embrace the delightful, quirky mysteries of our world.

So grab your popcorn (non-GMO, if you prefer) and settle in for a study that promises to be as thought-provoking as it is unexpectedly amusing. Let's embark on a journey into the heartland of agricultural enigmas and reality TV curiosities, where the seeds of knowledge are sown amidst the harmonious cacophony of statistical analysis and melodious melodies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Corn Yields and American Idol Fields: A Genetically Modified Connection?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unexpected and possibly unorthodox connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Michigan and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. Our research team meticulously combed through data from the USDA to analyze corn yields in Michigan, while simultaneously drawing from the depths of Wikipedia to assess the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. To our surprise, we uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9620257 and p < 0.01 between the two seemingly disparate variables for the years 2002 to 2022. While we expected to find mere husks of evidence linking these phenomena, our findings suggest a rather corny connection between crop biotechnology and pop culture. Our research leaves us pondering whether GMO corn has been quietly crooning its way into the hearts of American TV audiences, or if American Idol has surreptitiously influenced corn yield trends. We invite fellow researchers to join us in exploring this uncharted territory where the fields of agriculture and entertainment intersect.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of agriculture and popular culture has often been overlooked in academic research, with most scholars tending to focus on more traditional and less glamorous topics. However, in the words of William Shakespeare, "Though she be but little, she is fierce." In this case, the seemingly innocuous cornfields of Michigan and the glitzy, high-energy world of American Idol intertwine in a way that challenges traditional academic boundaries and tickles the fancy of our intellectual curiosity.
As we delve into this peculiar connection, we cannot help but marvel at the sheer serendipity of stumbling upon a correlation between GMO corn production and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. It is a tale as old as time - the story of genetically modified organisms infiltrating the agricultural landscape and a television program captivating audiences across the nation. One might say it has all the makings of a blockbuster Hollywood rom-com, but instead of star-crossed lovers, we are presented with star-crossed variables.
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in crop production has been a topic of intense debate and scrutiny. Critics have expressed concerns about the potential health and environmental impacts, while proponents have touted the benefits of increased yields and pest resistance. Meanwhile, the American Idol phenomenon has enthralled audiences with its spectacle of raw talent, tear-jerking performances, and the occasional judging panel drama. Who could have foreseen that these two seemingly disparate worlds would collide in such a statistically significant manner?
Our journey into this unexplored territory has led us to question the very fabric of our understanding of agriculture and entertainment. Are we witnessing a phenomenon where GMO corn, with its genetically engineered traits, is silently serenading TV audiences, captivating them with its yields just as much as its musical talents? Or could it be that American Idol, with its mesmerizing allure, has covertly influenced the trends in corn production, compelling farmers to plant the seeds of change in their fields?
In the age-old tradition of academic inquiry, we have set out to unpack these mysteries and shed light on this curious correlation. Our findings not only challenge preconceived notions about the realm of agricultural biotechnology and popular TV programming but also invite us to embrace the unexpected and embrace the delightful, quirky mysteries of our world.
So grab your popcorn (non-GMO, if you prefer) and settle in for a study that promises to be as thought-provoking as it is unexpectedly amusing. Let's embark on a journey into the heartland of agricultural enigmas and reality TV curiosities, where the seeds of knowledge are sown amidst the harmonious cacophony of statistical analysis and melodious melodies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The investigation into the relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale has led us down a fascinating rabbit hole of scholarly inquiry. In "Agricultural Biotechnology: Challenges and Prospects" by Smith, the authors outline the potential impacts of GMO use on crop yields and the environment, providing a foundational understanding of the agricultural landscape. Furthermore, Doe's "The Economics of Corn Production" offers valuable insights into the economic factors influencing the cultivation of corn, shedding light on the intricacies of crop management and market dynamics.

While these scholarly works provide a solid framework for examining agricultural biotechnology and crop production, our quest for understanding takes an unexpected turn as we dig deeper into unconventional sources. "From Farm to Fame: The Influence of Pop Culture on Agriculture" by Jones offers an intriguing perspective on the interplay between agricultural practices and popular culture, hinting at the possibility of a clandestine connection between GMO corn and television viewership.

Venturing even further into uncharted territory, we encounter some unexpected literary companions that add an element of whimsy to our scholarly pursuit. "The Corn Identity" by Ludlum and "GMOs and Glee: An Unlikely Harmony" by Murphy beckon us to consider the potential for hidden messages in cornfields and the captivating allure of genetically modified melodies.

In addition to these literary escapades, the emergence of popular internet memes such as the "GMO Corn Idol" and "Cornfields' Got Talent" only serves to fuel our curiosity about the intertwined fates of agriculture and entertainment.

As we navigate this unconventional landscape of scholarly inquiry, we are reminded that sometimes the most peculiar connections can yield the most intriguing revelations. With an open mind and a penchant for the unexpected, we continue our expedition into the heart of this enigmatic correlation, where the fields of academic research and lighthearted merriment convergemeld seamlessly.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Wikipedia . You used data from 2002 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Corn Yields and American Idol Fields: A Genetically Modified Connection?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unexpected and possibly unorthodox connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Michigan and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. Our research team meticulously combed through data from the USDA to analyze corn yields in Michigan, while simultaneously drawing from the depths of Wikipedia to assess the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. To our surprise, we uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9620257 and p < 0.01 between the two seemingly disparate variables for the years 2002 to 2022. While we expected to find mere husks of evidence linking these phenomena, our findings suggest a rather corny connection between crop biotechnology and pop culture. Our research leaves us pondering whether GMO corn has been quietly crooning its way into the hearts of American TV audiences, or if American Idol has surreptitiously influenced corn yield trends. We invite fellow researchers to join us in exploring this uncharted territory where the fields of agriculture and entertainment intersect.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of agriculture and popular culture has often been overlooked in academic research, with most scholars tending to focus on more traditional and less glamorous topics. However, in the words of William Shakespeare, "Though she be but little, she is fierce." In this case, the seemingly innocuous cornfields of Michigan and the glitzy, high-energy world of American Idol intertwine in a way that challenges traditional academic boundaries and tickles the fancy of our intellectual curiosity.
As we delve into this peculiar connection, we cannot help but marvel at the sheer serendipity of stumbling upon a correlation between GMO corn production and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. It is a tale as old as time - the story of genetically modified organisms infiltrating the agricultural landscape and a television program captivating audiences across the nation. One might say it has all the makings of a blockbuster Hollywood rom-com, but instead of star-crossed lovers, we are presented with star-crossed variables.
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in crop production has been a topic of intense debate and scrutiny. Critics have expressed concerns about the potential health and environmental impacts, while proponents have touted the benefits of increased yields and pest resistance. Meanwhile, the American Idol phenomenon has enthralled audiences with its spectacle of raw talent, tear-jerking performances, and the occasional judging panel drama. Who could have foreseen that these two seemingly disparate worlds would collide in such a statistically significant manner?
Our journey into this unexplored territory has led us to question the very fabric of our understanding of agriculture and entertainment. Are we witnessing a phenomenon where GMO corn, with its genetically engineered traits, is silently serenading TV audiences, captivating them with its yields just as much as its musical talents? Or could it be that American Idol, with its mesmerizing allure, has covertly influenced the trends in corn production, compelling farmers to plant the seeds of change in their fields?
In the age-old tradition of academic inquiry, we have set out to unpack these mysteries and shed light on this curious correlation. Our findings not only challenge preconceived notions about the realm of agricultural biotechnology and popular TV programming but also invite us to embrace the unexpected and embrace the delightful, quirky mysteries of our world.
So grab your popcorn (non-GMO, if you prefer) and settle in for a study that promises to be as thought-provoking as it is unexpectedly amusing. Let's embark on a journey into the heartland of agricultural enigmas and reality TV curiosities, where the seeds of knowledge are sown amidst the harmonious cacophony of statistical analysis and melodious melodies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To commence our investigation into the seemingly whimsical yet potentially robust connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale, our research team employed a multifaceted approach that combined quantitative analysis with a sprinkle of pop culture intrigue. The first step in our methodology involved the meticulous collection of data from various sources, including the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and the treasure trove of information known as Wikipedia. We recognize that Wikipedia may not always be the most academically rigorous source, but in the spirit of embracing the unexpected, we ventured into its digital corridors to extract pertinent details regarding the viewership counts of the American Idol Season Finale.

With data in hand, we embarked on a journey through the annals of time, focusing on the years 2002 to 2022 to capture a comprehensive snapshot of the corny trends in Michigan and the captivating allure of American Idol. The decision to span two decades was not arbitrary; rather, it allowed us to encapsulate the full scope of GMO adoption in the corn industry and the enduring legacy of American Idol as a cultural phenomenon.

Once armed with a bounty of data, we then proceeded to conduct rigorous statistical analyses, employing both correlation and regression techniques to unravel the nuanced relationship between GMO use in corn production and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. To further tease out potential explanatory variables and confounding factors, we delved into the realm of multivariate analysis, adding layers of complexity to our pursuit of empirical understanding.

One might liken our methodological approach to navigating a corn maze while simultaneously belting out tunes from a reality TV show – a blend of careful navigation and harmonious exploration. With this unconventional yet robust methodology, we endeavored to shed light on an unexpected yet compelling correlation that has captured our intellectual curiosity and left us pondering the delightful mysteries that lie at the intersection of agriculture and popular entertainment.

Now, having illuminated the path we traversed in our quest for understanding, let us move on to the intriguing findings that emerged from our unorthodox but fruitful methodology.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Wikipedia .

For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9620257, r-squared of 0.9254934, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Corn Yields and American Idol Fields: A Genetically Modified Connection?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unexpected and possibly unorthodox connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Michigan and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. Our research team meticulously combed through data from the USDA to analyze corn yields in Michigan, while simultaneously drawing from the depths of Wikipedia to assess the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. To our surprise, we uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9620257 and p < 0.01 between the two seemingly disparate variables for the years 2002 to 2022. While we expected to find mere husks of evidence linking these phenomena, our findings suggest a rather corny connection between crop biotechnology and pop culture. Our research leaves us pondering whether GMO corn has been quietly crooning its way into the hearts of American TV audiences, or if American Idol has surreptitiously influenced corn yield trends. We invite fellow researchers to join us in exploring this uncharted territory where the fields of agriculture and entertainment intersect.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of agriculture and popular culture has often been overlooked in academic research, with most scholars tending to focus on more traditional and less glamorous topics. However, in the words of William Shakespeare, "Though she be but little, she is fierce." In this case, the seemingly innocuous cornfields of Michigan and the glitzy, high-energy world of American Idol intertwine in a way that challenges traditional academic boundaries and tickles the fancy of our intellectual curiosity.
As we delve into this peculiar connection, we cannot help but marvel at the sheer serendipity of stumbling upon a correlation between GMO corn production and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. It is a tale as old as time - the story of genetically modified organisms infiltrating the agricultural landscape and a television program captivating audiences across the nation. One might say it has all the makings of a blockbuster Hollywood rom-com, but instead of star-crossed lovers, we are presented with star-crossed variables.
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in crop production has been a topic of intense debate and scrutiny. Critics have expressed concerns about the potential health and environmental impacts, while proponents have touted the benefits of increased yields and pest resistance. Meanwhile, the American Idol phenomenon has enthralled audiences with its spectacle of raw talent, tear-jerking performances, and the occasional judging panel drama. Who could have foreseen that these two seemingly disparate worlds would collide in such a statistically significant manner?
Our journey into this unexplored territory has led us to question the very fabric of our understanding of agriculture and entertainment. Are we witnessing a phenomenon where GMO corn, with its genetically engineered traits, is silently serenading TV audiences, captivating them with its yields just as much as its musical talents? Or could it be that American Idol, with its mesmerizing allure, has covertly influenced the trends in corn production, compelling farmers to plant the seeds of change in their fields?
In the age-old tradition of academic inquiry, we have set out to unpack these mysteries and shed light on this curious correlation. Our findings not only challenge preconceived notions about the realm of agricultural biotechnology and popular TV programming but also invite us to embrace the unexpected and embrace the delightful, quirky mysteries of our world.
So grab your popcorn (non-GMO, if you prefer) and settle in for a study that promises to be as thought-provoking as it is unexpectedly amusing. Let's embark on a journey into the heartland of agricultural enigmas and reality TV curiosities, where the seeds of knowledge are sown amidst the harmonious cacophony of statistical analysis and melodious melodies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Michigan and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. For the time period from 2002 to 2022, the correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.9620257, with an r-squared value of 0.9254934, and a p-value of less than 0.01. These findings suggest a highly significant relationship between the two variables, much to our surprise and bemusement.

Fig. 1 illustrates the strong correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. The scatterplot depicts a clear trend, with increasing GMO use in corn production coinciding with higher viewership counts of the American Idol Season Finale. As we marveled at this intriguing relationship, we couldn't help but appreciate the corny humor in uncovering a connection that seems to transcend the boundaries of agriculture and entertainment.

These results challenge conventional wisdom and beckon us to further explore the nuanced dynamics at play. While our initial hypothesis was met with some skepticism and raised more than a few eyebrows, the data speaks for itself, weaving a story of unexpected correlation between the biological and the televised. It appears that there may be more to GMO corn than meets the ear, and American Idol's influence reaches beyond the television screen, perhaps echoing through the very fields of agriculture.

Our findings open the door to a myriad of questions and possibilities, inviting both agricultural and entertainment scholars to contemplate the implications of this peculiar correlation. As we digest these results, we are reminded of the words of Carl Sagan, "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known." In this case, that something incredible may very well be the intertwined fate of genetically modified corn and reality TV fandom, creating stalks of intrigue and kernels of curiosity for researchers to explore. In the words of Simon Cowell, it's a "yes" from us to further unraveling this unexpected harmony between the agricultural and the idolized.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Corn Yields and American Idol Fields: A Genetically Modified Connection?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unexpected and possibly unorthodox connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Michigan and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. Our research team meticulously combed through data from the USDA to analyze corn yields in Michigan, while simultaneously drawing from the depths of Wikipedia to assess the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. To our surprise, we uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9620257 and p < 0.01 between the two seemingly disparate variables for the years 2002 to 2022. While we expected to find mere husks of evidence linking these phenomena, our findings suggest a rather corny connection between crop biotechnology and pop culture. Our research leaves us pondering whether GMO corn has been quietly crooning its way into the hearts of American TV audiences, or if American Idol has surreptitiously influenced corn yield trends. We invite fellow researchers to join us in exploring this uncharted territory where the fields of agriculture and entertainment intersect.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The investigation into the relationship between genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale has led us down a fascinating rabbit hole of scholarly inquiry. In "Agricultural Biotechnology: Challenges and Prospects" by Smith, the authors outline the potential impacts of GMO use on crop yields and the environment, providing a foundational understanding of the agricultural landscape. Furthermore, Doe's "The Economics of Corn Production" offers valuable insights into the economic factors influencing the cultivation of corn, shedding light on the intricacies of crop management and market dynamics.
While these scholarly works provide a solid framework for examining agricultural biotechnology and crop production, our quest for understanding takes an unexpected turn as we dig deeper into unconventional sources. "From Farm to Fame: The Influence of Pop Culture on Agriculture" by Jones offers an intriguing perspective on the interplay between agricultural practices and popular culture, hinting at the possibility of a clandestine connection between GMO corn and television viewership.
Venturing even further into uncharted territory, we encounter some unexpected literary companions that add an element of whimsy to our scholarly pursuit. "The Corn Identity" by Ludlum and "GMOs and Glee: An Unlikely Harmony" by Murphy beckon us to consider the potential for hidden messages in cornfields and the captivating allure of genetically modified melodies.
In addition to these literary escapades, the emergence of popular internet memes such as the "GMO Corn Idol" and "Cornfields' Got Talent" only serves to fuel our curiosity about the intertwined fates of agriculture and entertainment.
As we navigate this unconventional landscape of scholarly inquiry, we are reminded that sometimes the most peculiar connections can yield the most intriguing revelations. With an open mind and a penchant for the unexpected, we continue our expedition into the heart of this enigmatic correlation, where the fields of academic research and lighthearted merriment convergemeld seamlessly.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Michigan and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. For the time period from 2002 to 2022, the correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.9620257, with an r-squared value of 0.9254934, and a p-value of less than 0.01. These findings suggest a highly significant relationship between the two variables, much to our surprise and bemusement.
Fig. 1 illustrates the strong correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. The scatterplot depicts a clear trend, with increasing GMO use in corn production coinciding with higher viewership counts of the American Idol Season Finale. As we marveled at this intriguing relationship, we couldn't help but appreciate the corny humor in uncovering a connection that seems to transcend the boundaries of agriculture and entertainment.
These results challenge conventional wisdom and beckon us to further explore the nuanced dynamics at play. While our initial hypothesis was met with some skepticism and raised more than a few eyebrows, the data speaks for itself, weaving a story of unexpected correlation between the biological and the televised. It appears that there may be more to GMO corn than meets the ear, and American Idol's influence reaches beyond the television screen, perhaps echoing through the very fields of agriculture.
Our findings open the door to a myriad of questions and possibilities, inviting both agricultural and entertainment scholars to contemplate the implications of this peculiar correlation. As we digest these results, we are reminded of the words of Carl Sagan, "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known." In this case, that something incredible may very well be the intertwined fate of genetically modified corn and reality TV fandom, creating stalks of intrigue and kernels of curiosity for researchers to explore. In the words of Simon Cowell, it's a "yes" from us to further unraveling this unexpected harmony between the agricultural and the idolized.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study have ignited a spark of curiosity, shedding light on the hitherto unforeseen relationship between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Michigan and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. As we reflect on the scholarly journey that led us to this intriguing intersection of agriculture and entertainment, it becomes evident that our quest for understanding has led us through both conventional academic discourse and more whimsical literary escapades.

Our results, remarkably in alignment with the prior research, support the notion put forth by Smith in "Agricultural Biotechnology: Challenges and Prospects." The strong correlation between GMO use and corn yields underscores the potential impact of biotechnology on crop production, providing empirical evidence for the agricultural landscape. Similarly, Doe's "The Economics of Corn Production" emerges as a guiding beacon, illuminating the economic factors that influence corn cultivation. While these works offer a serious examination of agricultural dynamics, they have unwittingly set the stage for the unveiling of an unexpected phenomenon, which can be likened to finding a diamond amidst a field of cornstalks.

Moreover, as we delve into the more unconventional aspects of our literary review, we are compelled to acknowledge the whimsical insights offered by Jones in "From Farm to Fame: The Influence of Pop Culture on Agriculture." While the title may solicit a nostalgic chuckle, the underlying narrative presents a thought-provoking perspective on the interplay between agricultural practices and popular culture. The unexpected literary companions such as Ludlum's "The Corn Identity" and Murphy's "GMOs and Glee: An Unlikely Harmony" manifest as not just amusing detours from traditional scholarly discourse, but as integral threads in the intertwining fabric of our inquiry. These unconventional sources have imparted an element of playfulness to our pursuit, beckoning us to embrace the unexpected and perhaps even finding joy in the pursuit of scholarly knowledge.

Reflecting on our results with a touch of levity, it seems that while we may have started the study with a kernel of skepticism, the data has literally popped open a can of corny connections. Our findings suggest a harmonious duet between the genetic modifications in corn production and the fanfare of the American Idol Season Finale. In a serendipitous twist, our statistical analysis has uncovered a correlation that extends beyond the confines of traditional research pursuits, infusing a whimsical aire to our academic journey.

As we navigate the ostensibly serious terrain of scholarly inquiry, we are reminded of the potential for unexpected insights to emerge from the unlikeliest of places. Our results, while seemingly lighthearted in their implications, beckon us to consider the broader implications of this correlation, propelling us into a realm where the boundaries between serious scholarship and tongue-in-cheek musings begin to blur.

In the spirit of scholarly inquiry and perhaps a dash of whimsy, our findings invite further contemplation of the interplay between the biological and the televised. In the hallowed words of Simon Cowell, it's a resounding "yes" from us to delving deeper into this uncharted territory, where the fields of agriculture and entertainment intersect in an almost symphonic harmony.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a goofy academic researcher writing an academic paper. You follow the rules, but you throw out convention regularly to make jokes and funny asides.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Corn Yields and American Idol Fields: A Genetically Modified Connection?

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we delve into the unexpected and possibly unorthodox connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Michigan and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. Our research team meticulously combed through data from the USDA to analyze corn yields in Michigan, while simultaneously drawing from the depths of Wikipedia to assess the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. To our surprise, we uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9620257 and p < 0.01 between the two seemingly disparate variables for the years 2002 to 2022. While we expected to find mere husks of evidence linking these phenomena, our findings suggest a rather corny connection between crop biotechnology and pop culture. Our research leaves us pondering whether GMO corn has been quietly crooning its way into the hearts of American TV audiences, or if American Idol has surreptitiously influenced corn yield trends. We invite fellow researchers to join us in exploring this uncharted territory where the fields of agriculture and entertainment intersect.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of agriculture and popular culture has often been overlooked in academic research, with most scholars tending to focus on more traditional and less glamorous topics. However, in the words of William Shakespeare, "Though she be but little, she is fierce." In this case, the seemingly innocuous cornfields of Michigan and the glitzy, high-energy world of American Idol intertwine in a way that challenges traditional academic boundaries and tickles the fancy of our intellectual curiosity.
As we delve into this peculiar connection, we cannot help but marvel at the sheer serendipity of stumbling upon a correlation between GMO corn production and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. It is a tale as old as time - the story of genetically modified organisms infiltrating the agricultural landscape and a television program captivating audiences across the nation. One might say it has all the makings of a blockbuster Hollywood rom-com, but instead of star-crossed lovers, we are presented with star-crossed variables.
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in crop production has been a topic of intense debate and scrutiny. Critics have expressed concerns about the potential health and environmental impacts, while proponents have touted the benefits of increased yields and pest resistance. Meanwhile, the American Idol phenomenon has enthralled audiences with its spectacle of raw talent, tear-jerking performances, and the occasional judging panel drama. Who could have foreseen that these two seemingly disparate worlds would collide in such a statistically significant manner?
Our journey into this unexplored territory has led us to question the very fabric of our understanding of agriculture and entertainment. Are we witnessing a phenomenon where GMO corn, with its genetically engineered traits, is silently serenading TV audiences, captivating them with its yields just as much as its musical talents? Or could it be that American Idol, with its mesmerizing allure, has covertly influenced the trends in corn production, compelling farmers to plant the seeds of change in their fields?
In the age-old tradition of academic inquiry, we have set out to unpack these mysteries and shed light on this curious correlation. Our findings not only challenge preconceived notions about the realm of agricultural biotechnology and popular TV programming but also invite us to embrace the unexpected and embrace the delightful, quirky mysteries of our world.
So grab your popcorn (non-GMO, if you prefer) and settle in for a study that promises to be as thought-provoking as it is unexpectedly amusing. Let's embark on a journey into the heartland of agricultural enigmas and reality TV curiosities, where the seeds of knowledge are sown amidst the harmonious cacophony of statistical analysis and melodious melodies.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the data revealed a remarkably strong correlation between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Michigan and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. For the time period from 2002 to 2022, the correlation coefficient was calculated to be 0.9620257, with an r-squared value of 0.9254934, and a p-value of less than 0.01. These findings suggest a highly significant relationship between the two variables, much to our surprise and bemusement.
Fig. 1 illustrates the strong correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Michigan and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. The scatterplot depicts a clear trend, with increasing GMO use in corn production coinciding with higher viewership counts of the American Idol Season Finale. As we marveled at this intriguing relationship, we couldn't help but appreciate the corny humor in uncovering a connection that seems to transcend the boundaries of agriculture and entertainment.
These results challenge conventional wisdom and beckon us to further explore the nuanced dynamics at play. While our initial hypothesis was met with some skepticism and raised more than a few eyebrows, the data speaks for itself, weaving a story of unexpected correlation between the biological and the televised. It appears that there may be more to GMO corn than meets the ear, and American Idol's influence reaches beyond the television screen, perhaps echoing through the very fields of agriculture.
Our findings open the door to a myriad of questions and possibilities, inviting both agricultural and entertainment scholars to contemplate the implications of this peculiar correlation. As we digest these results, we are reminded of the words of Carl Sagan, "Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known." In this case, that something incredible may very well be the intertwined fate of genetically modified corn and reality TV fandom, creating stalks of intrigue and kernels of curiosity for researchers to explore. In the words of Simon Cowell, it's a "yes" from us to further unraveling this unexpected harmony between the agricultural and the idolized.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the illustrious words of Sir Isaac Newton, "If I have seen further, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants." In this case, we find ourselves standing not only on the shoulders of giants but also on the kernels of genetically modified corn, gazing into the starry expanse of unexpected correlations and interwoven destinies. Our foray into the peculiar connection between GMO use in Michigan cornfields and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale has led us down a path lined with statistical significance and a hint of whimsy. The results of our analysis have unveiled a correlation coefficient that boasts a strength akin to the mighty oak, standing tall amidst the tumultuous winds of skepticism and incredulity.

As we wrap up this perplexing yet delightfully intriguing chapter of our academic odyssey, we are left pondering the delightful mysteries and nuances of our world. Our findings add a frisson of excitement to the fields of agricultural biotechnology and pop culture fandom, infusing them with an unforeseen harmony that titillates the intellect and tickles the imagination. The prospect of GMO corn crooning its way into the hearts of American TV audiences or American Idol surreptitiously influencing the trends in corn production may seem as improbable as a cow jumping over the moon, yet the data leaves little room for doubt.

So, as we bid adieu to this study, we urge our fellow researchers to embrace the unexpected, for in the most unlikely of places, we may find kernels of wisdom and ears of truth. As we part ways with this enigmatic intersection of agriculture and entertainment, we do so with a wistful smile and a knowing twinkle in our eyes, for we have borne witness to the delightful whimsy that permeates our scholarly pursuits.

In the spirit of academic inquiry and with a tinge of lightheartedness, we unequivocally assert that further research in this offbeat arena is akin to asking a cornfield if it's ready for harvest in the dead of winter – utterly unnecessary. For, in the words of the inimitable American Idol host, Ryan Seacrest, "This is it." It is with a sense of closure and contentment that we bid adieu to this unusual yet amusing foray into the unexpected intersections of our world.

No further research is needed in this area.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Corn Yields and American Idol Fields: A Genetically Modified Connection?. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agricultural Genetics and Pop Culture Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Corn Yields and American Idol Fields: A Genetically Modified Connection?. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Agricultural Innovation and Popular Culture Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Corn Yields and American Idol Fields: A Genetically Modified Connection? with an abstract of In this study, we delve into the unexpected and possibly unorthodox connection between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn production in Michigan and the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. Our research team meticulously combed through data from the USDA to analyze corn yields in Michigan, while simultaneously drawing from the depths of Wikipedia to assess the viewership count of the American Idol Season Finale. To our surprise, we uncovered a remarkably strong correlation coefficient of 0.9620257 and p < 0.01 between the two seemingly disparate variables for the years 2002 to 2022. While we expected to find mere husks of evidence linking these phenomena, our findings suggest a rather corny connection between crop biotechnology and pop culture. Our research leaves us pondering whether GMO corn has been quietly crooning its way into the hearts of American TV audiences, or if American Idol has surreptitiously influenced corn yield trends. We invite fellow researchers to join us in exploring this uncharted territory where the fields of agriculture and entertainment intersect.

ChatGPT:

GMO, genetically modified organisms, corn production, Michigan, USDA data, crop yields, American Idol, viewership count, correlation coefficient, agriculture, entertainment, biotechnology, pop culture, research, correlation analysis, data analysis

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Michigan
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Michigan that is genetically modified to be insect-resistant (Bt), but not herbicide-tolerant (HT)
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Michigan

Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale

Correlation r = 0.9620257 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9254934 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 92.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Michigan) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.6E-12. 0.0000000000036129756379788052
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.96 in 3.6E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 276,780,166,876 random variables You don't actually need 276 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.91, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in corn grown in Michigan (GMO corn %)1218151516191513111184223123232
Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale (Viewers)23020000380600002884000030270000363800003076000031660000288400002422000029290000214900001431000010530000803000013300000086300008740000728000065000006490000




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([12,18,15,15,16,19,15,13,11,11,8,4,2,2,3,1,2,3,2,3,2,])
array_2 = np.array([23020000,38060000,28840000,30270000,36380000,30760000,31660000,28840000,24220000,29290000,21490000,14310000,10530000,8030000,13300000,0,8630000,8740000,7280000,6500000,6490000,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Michigan"
array_2_name = "Viewership count of American Idol Season Finale"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 2719 · Black Variable ID: 714 · Red Variable ID: 89
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0