about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,691 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and the second variable is Hollister retail store count worldwide.  The chart goes from 2000 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the size of the corn increased, so did the demand for larger overalls and plaid shirts, prompting Hollister to ramp up production and open more stores to meet the sartorial needs of the husky corn farmers. It's a case of agricultural fashion trends ear-resistibly shaping the retail landscape!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: Generate an image of a scene showcasing a vast Nebraska corn field with rows of genetically modified corn stretching to the horizon. Among the cornstalks, perfectly shaped crop circles have mysteriously formed, sparking curiosity about extraterrestrial activity. In the background, there is a bustling city with the iconic Hollister store standing as a beacon against the urban skyline. Its popularity has soared and is attracting shoppers from all corners of the universe, prompting the brand to rapidly expand its global presence. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Hollister retail store count worldwide. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Parallax art Cybernetic art inspired by bauhaus a funny image macro Symbolism
ChatGPT: a funny image macro

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Hollister retail store count worldwide, in the following situation: Because GMO corn in Nebraska caused crop circle formations, attracting extraterrestrial shoppers to Hollister, thus increasing demand for more stores worldwide.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a vast cornfield in Nebraska, rows of genetically modified corn stretch to the horizon. Among the cornstalks, perfectly shaped crop circles have mysteriously formed, sparking a buzz of extraterrestrial curiosity. Meanwhile, in a bustling city, the iconic Hollister store stands as a beacon against the urban skyline. Its popularity has soared, attracting shoppers from all corners of the universe, prompting the brand to rapidly expand its global presence.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ a funny image macro ] and depicting this scene: In a vast cornfield in Nebraska, rows of genetically modified corn stretch to the horizon. Among the cornstalks, perfectly shaped crop circles have mysteriously formed, sparking a buzz of extraterrestrial curiosity. Meanwhile, in a bustling city, the iconic Hollister store stands as a beacon against the urban skyline. Its popularity has soared, attracting shoppers from all corners of the universe, prompting the brand to rapidly expand its global presence. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: Generate an image of a scene showcasing a vast Nebraska corn field with rows of genetically modified corn stretching to the horizon. Among the cornstalks, perfectly shaped crop circles have mysteriously formed, sparking curiosity about extraterrestrial activity. In the background, there is a bustling city with the iconic Hollister store standing as a beacon against the urban skyline. Its popularity has soared and is attracting shoppers from all corners of the universe, prompting the brand to rapidly expand its global presence.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska caused Hollister retail store count worldwide to increase. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Stalk Market: The Corny Connection Between GMOs in Nebraska and Hollister Store Count Worldwide

The Journal of Agri-Fashion Economics

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Hollister retail store count worldwide. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from USDA and Statista to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9854679 and p < 0.01 for 2000 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk Market: The Corny Connection Between GMOs in Nebraska and Hollister Store Count Worldwide"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examined the seemingly bizarre yet potentially enlightening relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Nebraska's cornfields and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores on a global scale. While one might think this correlation is as peculiar as a corn stalk wearing a Hollister hoodie, our rigorous analysis yielded a surprising connection, much akin to stumbling upon a kernel of truth. By utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and Statista, we calculated a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9854679 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2000 to 2022. Our findings not only underscore the potential impact of GMOs on international retail landscapes but also serve as a reminder that, in the world of research, one must be willing to "stalk" unexpected pathways to uncover kernels of truth.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Hollister retail store count worldwide. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk Market: The Corny Connection Between GMOs in Nebraska and Hollister Store Count Worldwide"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examined the seemingly bizarre yet potentially enlightening relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Nebraska's cornfields and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores on a global scale. While one might think this correlation is as peculiar as a corn stalk wearing a Hollister hoodie, our rigorous analysis yielded a surprising connection, much akin to stumbling upon a kernel of truth. By utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and Statista, we calculated a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9854679 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2000 to 2022. Our findings not only underscore the potential impact of GMOs on international retail landscapes but also serve as a reminder that, in the world of research, one must be willing to "stalk" unexpected pathways to uncover kernels of truth.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Perplexing and seemingly unrelated phenomena have a way of intersecting in the most unexpected ways, much like stumbling upon a corn stalk wearing a Hollister hoodie. In this study, we embark on a journey to unravel the enigmatic correlation between the widespread utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Nebraska's cornfields and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores across the globe - a connection as surprising as finding corn huskers for sale at a fashion boutique.

The notion of corn and apparel retail may initially appear as strange bedfellows, akin to a cob of corn donning a pair of trendy, distressed jeans. However, our investigation into this peculiar association has unearthed a compelling story, much like the unexpected discovery of a "corny" dad joke at a scientific conference.

As we delve into this curious relationship, it is imperative to approach our exploration with the requisite rigor and empirical scrutiny. This undertaking necessitates a steadfast commitment to peeling back the layers, akin to shucking corn, as we seek to discern the kernels of truth lying beneath the surface.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Hollister retail store count worldwide. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk Market: The Corny Connection Between GMOs in Nebraska and Hollister Store Count Worldwide"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examined the seemingly bizarre yet potentially enlightening relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Nebraska's cornfields and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores on a global scale. While one might think this correlation is as peculiar as a corn stalk wearing a Hollister hoodie, our rigorous analysis yielded a surprising connection, much akin to stumbling upon a kernel of truth. By utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and Statista, we calculated a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9854679 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2000 to 2022. Our findings not only underscore the potential impact of GMOs on international retail landscapes but also serve as a reminder that, in the world of research, one must be willing to "stalk" unexpected pathways to uncover kernels of truth.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Perplexing and seemingly unrelated phenomena have a way of intersecting in the most unexpected ways, much like stumbling upon a corn stalk wearing a Hollister hoodie. In this study, we embark on a journey to unravel the enigmatic correlation between the widespread utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Nebraska's cornfields and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores across the globe - a connection as surprising as finding corn huskers for sale at a fashion boutique.
The notion of corn and apparel retail may initially appear as strange bedfellows, akin to a cob of corn donning a pair of trendy, distressed jeans. However, our investigation into this peculiar association has unearthed a compelling story, much like the unexpected discovery of a "corny" dad joke at a scientific conference.
As we delve into this curious relationship, it is imperative to approach our exploration with the requisite rigor and empirical scrutiny. This undertaking necessitates a steadfast commitment to peeling back the layers, akin to shucking corn, as we seek to discern the kernels of truth lying beneath the surface.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The literature abounds with studies examining the impact of GMOs on agricultural production and retail market dynamics. Smith et al. (2015) found that the adoption of genetically modified corn in Nebraska led to significant increases in crop yields and overall productivity. This finding, while intriguing, merely sows the seeds of our investigation into the uncharted territory of the Hollister phenomenon. Much like a corny joke at a farmers' market, our study aims to add a dash of humor to the often serious field of agricultural economics.

Turning to the retail sector, Doe and Jones (2018) conducted a comprehensive analysis of retail store proliferation worldwide, uncovering correlations between economic indicators and the spatial distribution of retail outlets. However, none of these previous studies have ventured into the realm of unearthing the unlikely connection between genetically modified corn and a particular fashion retailer. We aim to fill this gap, akin to the kernels of corn filling a cob, with our investigation into the "stalk" market.

In "The Omnivore's Dilemma," Michael Pollan explores the intricacies of the modern food industry, delving into the pervasive presence of genetically modified organisms and their effects on the agricultural landscape. While Pollan's work primarily focuses on food, it provides valuable insights into the broader impact of GMOs, offering a kernel of knowledge on which we can build our investigation. This literature, much like a grain of corn, serves as the foundation for our study.

On the fictional side, "Children of the Corn" by Stephen King presents a dystopian narrative set amidst the sprawling cornfields of Nebraska. While this novel may seem unrelated, the eerie atmosphere and sense of foreboding it evokes mirror the mystery shrouding the GMO-Hollister connection. Analogous to finding a popcorn kernel in a haystack, this work of fiction offers a whimsical parallel to our investigation.

Taking inspiration from the world of board games, "Farmers of the Moor" introduces players to the challenges of managing resources on a farm. While the game does not directly address the intersection of GMOs and retail outlets, its agricultural theme and emphasis on strategic decision-making offer a lighthearted perspective on the complex dynamics we seek to elucidate. Just like a kernel of corn in a haystack, our study strives to uncover the unexpected amidst seemingly unrelated domains.

As we journey further into this unconventional intersection of agriculture and retail, we are reminded that even the most seemingly disparate elements may coalesce in unexpected ways, much like finding a corny dad joke in a scholarly publication.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Hollister retail store count worldwide. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista . You used data from 2000 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk Market: The Corny Connection Between GMOs in Nebraska and Hollister Store Count Worldwide"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examined the seemingly bizarre yet potentially enlightening relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Nebraska's cornfields and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores on a global scale. While one might think this correlation is as peculiar as a corn stalk wearing a Hollister hoodie, our rigorous analysis yielded a surprising connection, much akin to stumbling upon a kernel of truth. By utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and Statista, we calculated a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9854679 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2000 to 2022. Our findings not only underscore the potential impact of GMOs on international retail landscapes but also serve as a reminder that, in the world of research, one must be willing to "stalk" unexpected pathways to uncover kernels of truth.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Perplexing and seemingly unrelated phenomena have a way of intersecting in the most unexpected ways, much like stumbling upon a corn stalk wearing a Hollister hoodie. In this study, we embark on a journey to unravel the enigmatic correlation between the widespread utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Nebraska's cornfields and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores across the globe - a connection as surprising as finding corn huskers for sale at a fashion boutique.
The notion of corn and apparel retail may initially appear as strange bedfellows, akin to a cob of corn donning a pair of trendy, distressed jeans. However, our investigation into this peculiar association has unearthed a compelling story, much like the unexpected discovery of a "corny" dad joke at a scientific conference.
As we delve into this curious relationship, it is imperative to approach our exploration with the requisite rigor and empirical scrutiny. This undertaking necessitates a steadfast commitment to peeling back the layers, akin to shucking corn, as we seek to discern the kernels of truth lying beneath the surface.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the tantalizing connection between GMO usage in Nebraska's corn production and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide, our research team employed a combination of quantitative analysis, statistical modeling, and a touch of whimsy. Much like crossing a cornfield in search of a hidden treasure, our methodology involved navigating through vast amounts of data with the precision of a corn shucker and the intuition of a seasoned retail analyst.

We first compiled data on the production of GMO corn in Nebraska from the United States Department of Agriculture, utilizing their Crop Production Historical Track Records database. Understanding the complexity and variability in corn production can be as perplexing as navigating a corn maze at night, but our team diligently sifted through the wealth of data with the determination of a farmer tending to their fields.

Taking a playful detour from traditional methodologies, we embraced a novel approach by incorporating the retail store count of Hollister locations worldwide as our dependent variable. This unorthodox approach allowed us to shed light on the potential influence of GMO corn cultivation on the retail landscape, evoking parallels to the unexpected whimsy of stumbling upon a corn husk repurposed as a designer accessory.

With data on Hollister store counts sourced from Statista, our team meticulously curated a comprehensive dataset spanning the years 2000 to 2022, akin to selecting only the finest kernels from a cob of corn. Engaging in such meticulous curation is akin to picking out only the most stylish apparel from a crowded rack – it requires attention to detail and an eye for significant trends and patterns.

In order to establish the potential relationship between GMO corn production and Hollister store counts, we employed advanced statistical techniques, including multiple regression analysis and time series modeling. As we delved into these complex statistical methodologies, we resolved to approach the task with the resilience of a cornstalk swaying in the wind, undeterred by the twists and turns of the statistical landscape.

To capture the nuances of this enigmatic relationship, we controlled for various factors, such as global economic trends, consumer behavior, and the rise of competing retail brands. Navigating through these multifaceted variables required the strategic finesse of a maize farmer tending to their crop amidst unpredictable weather patterns, all while carefully avoiding any "corny" humor.

In the spirit of maintaining methodological rigor, we also conducted robustness checks and sensitivity analyses to ensure the stability of our findings. Much like stress-testing a cob of corn for its resilience, these additional analyses provided an extra layer of confidence in the robustness of our results.

There you have it - our methodology that combines serious statistical analysis with the lighthearted whimsy of corny humor, showcasing that in the world of academic research, one can indeed "stalk" a bountiful harvest of unexpected discoveries.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Hollister retail store count worldwide. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Statista .

For the time period 2000 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9854679, r-squared of 0.9711471, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk Market: The Corny Connection Between GMOs in Nebraska and Hollister Store Count Worldwide"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examined the seemingly bizarre yet potentially enlightening relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Nebraska's cornfields and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores on a global scale. While one might think this correlation is as peculiar as a corn stalk wearing a Hollister hoodie, our rigorous analysis yielded a surprising connection, much akin to stumbling upon a kernel of truth. By utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and Statista, we calculated a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9854679 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2000 to 2022. Our findings not only underscore the potential impact of GMOs on international retail landscapes but also serve as a reminder that, in the world of research, one must be willing to "stalk" unexpected pathways to uncover kernels of truth.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Perplexing and seemingly unrelated phenomena have a way of intersecting in the most unexpected ways, much like stumbling upon a corn stalk wearing a Hollister hoodie. In this study, we embark on a journey to unravel the enigmatic correlation between the widespread utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Nebraska's cornfields and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores across the globe - a connection as surprising as finding corn huskers for sale at a fashion boutique.
The notion of corn and apparel retail may initially appear as strange bedfellows, akin to a cob of corn donning a pair of trendy, distressed jeans. However, our investigation into this peculiar association has unearthed a compelling story, much like the unexpected discovery of a "corny" dad joke at a scientific conference.
As we delve into this curious relationship, it is imperative to approach our exploration with the requisite rigor and empirical scrutiny. This undertaking necessitates a steadfast commitment to peeling back the layers, akin to shucking corn, as we seek to discern the kernels of truth lying beneath the surface.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data collected from the USDA and Statista revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9854679 between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Nebraska and the global count of Hollister retail stores. This strong correlation evokes the imagery of an ear of corn being a-maize-ingly fashionable, much like a Hollister-clad fashion influencer.

Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.9711471 indicates that approximately 97.11% of the variability in the proliferation of Hollister stores worldwide can be explained by the usage of GMOs in Nebraska's cornfields. It's as though the correlation between GMOs and Hollister stores is as predictable as finding corn in a maize maze.

The statistical analysis also yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, emphasizing the robustness and high significance of the relationship discovered. This statistical significance is as clear as corn - it's hard to husk around.

Additionally, Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between GMO use in Nebraska's corn and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. The figure captures the essence of this unexpected relationship, much like a photograph of a cornfield with a backdrop of trendy Hollister stores.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Hollister retail store count worldwide. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Stalk Market: The Corny Connection Between GMOs in Nebraska and Hollister Store Count Worldwide"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examined the seemingly bizarre yet potentially enlightening relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Nebraska's cornfields and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores on a global scale. While one might think this correlation is as peculiar as a corn stalk wearing a Hollister hoodie, our rigorous analysis yielded a surprising connection, much akin to stumbling upon a kernel of truth. By utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and Statista, we calculated a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9854679 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2000 to 2022. Our findings not only underscore the potential impact of GMOs on international retail landscapes but also serve as a reminder that, in the world of research, one must be willing to "stalk" unexpected pathways to uncover kernels of truth.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The literature abounds with studies examining the impact of GMOs on agricultural production and retail market dynamics. Smith et al. (2015) found that the adoption of genetically modified corn in Nebraska led to significant increases in crop yields and overall productivity. This finding, while intriguing, merely sows the seeds of our investigation into the uncharted territory of the Hollister phenomenon. Much like a corny joke at a farmers' market, our study aims to add a dash of humor to the often serious field of agricultural economics.
Turning to the retail sector, Doe and Jones (2018) conducted a comprehensive analysis of retail store proliferation worldwide, uncovering correlations between economic indicators and the spatial distribution of retail outlets. However, none of these previous studies have ventured into the realm of unearthing the unlikely connection between genetically modified corn and a particular fashion retailer. We aim to fill this gap, akin to the kernels of corn filling a cob, with our investigation into the "stalk" market.
In "The Omnivore's Dilemma," Michael Pollan explores the intricacies of the modern food industry, delving into the pervasive presence of genetically modified organisms and their effects on the agricultural landscape. While Pollan's work primarily focuses on food, it provides valuable insights into the broader impact of GMOs, offering a kernel of knowledge on which we can build our investigation. This literature, much like a grain of corn, serves as the foundation for our study.
On the fictional side, "Children of the Corn" by Stephen King presents a dystopian narrative set amidst the sprawling cornfields of Nebraska. While this novel may seem unrelated, the eerie atmosphere and sense of foreboding it evokes mirror the mystery shrouding the GMO-Hollister connection. Analogous to finding a popcorn kernel in a haystack, this work of fiction offers a whimsical parallel to our investigation.
Taking inspiration from the world of board games, "Farmers of the Moor" introduces players to the challenges of managing resources on a farm. While the game does not directly address the intersection of GMOs and retail outlets, its agricultural theme and emphasis on strategic decision-making offer a lighthearted perspective on the complex dynamics we seek to elucidate. Just like a kernel of corn in a haystack, our study strives to uncover the unexpected amidst seemingly unrelated domains.
As we journey further into this unconventional intersection of agriculture and retail, we are reminded that even the most seemingly disparate elements may coalesce in unexpected ways, much like finding a corny dad joke in a scholarly publication.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the USDA and Statista revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9854679 between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Nebraska and the global count of Hollister retail stores. This strong correlation evokes the imagery of an ear of corn being a-maize-ingly fashionable, much like a Hollister-clad fashion influencer.
Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.9711471 indicates that approximately 97.11% of the variability in the proliferation of Hollister stores worldwide can be explained by the usage of GMOs in Nebraska's cornfields. It's as though the correlation between GMOs and Hollister stores is as predictable as finding corn in a maize maze.
The statistical analysis also yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, emphasizing the robustness and high significance of the relationship discovered. This statistical significance is as clear as corn - it's hard to husk around.
Additionally, Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between GMO use in Nebraska's corn and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. The figure captures the essence of this unexpected relationship, much like a photograph of a cornfield with a backdrop of trendy Hollister stores.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of our study have unearthed a connection that may leave one feeling, well, a-maize-d. The remarkable correlation we discovered between the usage of GMOs in Nebraska's cornfields and the global count of Hollister retail stores is as intriguing as finding a corn husker in a fashion boutique.

Our results are in line with prior research on the impact of GMOs on agricultural production and retail dynamics. Smith et al.'s (2015) findings on increased crop yields due to genetically modified corn align with our results, highlighting the potential implications of GMO adoption on retail landscapes. It seems that GMOs are not just changing crop yields, but also the retail "stalk" market!

Similarly, Doe and Jones (2018) identified correlations between economic indicators and the spatial distribution of retail outlets, setting the stage for our investigation into the unexpected link between GMOs and a specific fashion retailer. It's as if economic indicators and genetically modified corn are a-ear-antly intertwined in the global retail scene.

While the literature review may have seemed as whimsical as a game of "Farmers of the Moor," the serious implications of our findings cannot be ignored. The statistically significant relationship between GMO use in Nebraska's corn and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide is as real as husking corn in the heartland.

Our results provide a unique perspective on the broader impact of GMOs, underscoring the potential influence of agricultural practices on the global retail market. It appears that the influence of GMOs extends beyond just producing a-maize-ing corn to influencing the retail "stalk" market in unforeseen ways.

In conclusion, our study has peeled back the husk on an unexpected correlation, shedding light on the interconnectedness of seemingly disparate domains. Just like a good dad joke, there may be more kernels of truth hidden in unexpected places - or unexpected combinations of genetically modified crops and retail store proliferation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska and Hollister retail store count worldwide. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Stalk Market: The Corny Connection Between GMOs in Nebraska and Hollister Store Count Worldwide"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this study, we examined the seemingly bizarre yet potentially enlightening relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Nebraska's cornfields and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores on a global scale. While one might think this correlation is as peculiar as a corn stalk wearing a Hollister hoodie, our rigorous analysis yielded a surprising connection, much akin to stumbling upon a kernel of truth. By utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and Statista, we calculated a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9854679 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2000 to 2022. Our findings not only underscore the potential impact of GMOs on international retail landscapes but also serve as a reminder that, in the world of research, one must be willing to "stalk" unexpected pathways to uncover kernels of truth.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Perplexing and seemingly unrelated phenomena have a way of intersecting in the most unexpected ways, much like stumbling upon a corn stalk wearing a Hollister hoodie. In this study, we embark on a journey to unravel the enigmatic correlation between the widespread utilization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Nebraska's cornfields and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores across the globe - a connection as surprising as finding corn huskers for sale at a fashion boutique.
The notion of corn and apparel retail may initially appear as strange bedfellows, akin to a cob of corn donning a pair of trendy, distressed jeans. However, our investigation into this peculiar association has unearthed a compelling story, much like the unexpected discovery of a "corny" dad joke at a scientific conference.
As we delve into this curious relationship, it is imperative to approach our exploration with the requisite rigor and empirical scrutiny. This undertaking necessitates a steadfast commitment to peeling back the layers, akin to shucking corn, as we seek to discern the kernels of truth lying beneath the surface.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data collected from the USDA and Statista revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9854679 between the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in corn cultivation in Nebraska and the global count of Hollister retail stores. This strong correlation evokes the imagery of an ear of corn being a-maize-ingly fashionable, much like a Hollister-clad fashion influencer.
Furthermore, the calculated r-squared value of 0.9711471 indicates that approximately 97.11% of the variability in the proliferation of Hollister stores worldwide can be explained by the usage of GMOs in Nebraska's cornfields. It's as though the correlation between GMOs and Hollister stores is as predictable as finding corn in a maize maze.
The statistical analysis also yielded a p-value of less than 0.01, emphasizing the robustness and high significance of the relationship discovered. This statistical significance is as clear as corn - it's hard to husk around.
Additionally, Fig. 1 presents a scatterplot illustrating the strong positive correlation between GMO use in Nebraska's corn and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores worldwide. The figure captures the essence of this unexpected relationship, much like a photograph of a cornfield with a backdrop of trendy Hollister stores.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has not only shed light on the corny correlation between GMO use in Nebraska and the global count of Hollister retail stores but also demonstrated the potential impact of agricultural practices on the retail landscape. This unexpected link between agriculture and fashion is truly an ear-resistible finding, akin to the unexpected pairing of a corn cob and a Hollister t-shirt.

Our findings underscore the importance of exploring seemingly unrelated variables in research, reminding us that valuable insights can be gleaned from the most unexpected places. It's almost like finding a kernel of wisdom in a corny dad joke - a-maize-ing.

As we wrap up, it's clear that no more research is needed in this area. Our study has indeed popped the corn on this intriguing connection, and future efforts should focus on uncovering other surprising correlations. After all, in the world of research, one must never be afraid to venture into uncharted cornfields.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Stalk Market: The Corny Connection Between GMOs in Nebraska and Hollister Store Count Worldwide. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Agri-Fashion Economics


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Stalk Market: The Corny Connection Between GMOs in Nebraska and Hollister Store Count Worldwide. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Center for Agricultural Innovation and Consumer Behavior Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Stalk Market: The Corny Connection Between GMOs in Nebraska and Hollister Store Count Worldwide with an abstract of In this study, we examined the seemingly bizarre yet potentially enlightening relationship between the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Nebraska's cornfields and the proliferation of Hollister retail stores on a global scale. While one might think this correlation is as peculiar as a corn stalk wearing a Hollister hoodie, our rigorous analysis yielded a surprising connection, much akin to stumbling upon a kernel of truth. By utilizing comprehensive data from the USDA and Statista, we calculated a remarkably high correlation coefficient of 0.9854679 and a statistically significant p-value of less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2000 to 2022. Our findings not only underscore the potential impact of GMOs on international retail landscapes but also serve as a reminder that, in the world of research, one must be willing to "stalk" unexpected pathways to uncover kernels of truth.

ChatGPT:

GMOs, Nebraska, cornfields, Hollister, retail stores, correlation, USDA data, Statista, international retail, GMO impact, correlation coefficient, p-value, research methods

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Nebraska that is genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska

Hollister retail store count worldwide
Source: Statista
See what else correlates with Hollister retail store count worldwide

Correlation r = 0.9854679 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9711471 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 97.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Hollister retail store count worldwide) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska) over the 23 years from 2000 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.2E-17. 0.0000000000000000118428715578
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 1.2E-15% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 84,438,980,454,987,376 random variables You don't actually need 84 quadrillion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 22 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 22 because we have two variables measured over a period of 23 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.97, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska (GMO corn %)3434465260697679869191939193969695969696949795
Hollister retail store count worldwide (Store count)53288167249309383447510525540571589587568553543538542546497505529




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([34,34,46,52,60,69,76,79,86,91,91,93,91,93,96,96,95,96,96,96,94,97,95,])
array_2 = np.array([5,32,88,167,249,309,383,447,510,525,540,571,589,587,568,553,543,538,542,546,497,505,529,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Nebraska"
array_2_name = "Hollister retail store count worldwide"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

You're a rater extraordinaire!


Correlation ID: 2691 · Black Variable ID: 760 · Red Variable ID: 176
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0