about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,689 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Marcella and the second variable is The number of private detectives in Rhode Island.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2018, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Because every time someone called out the name "Marcella," it sounded like a case was being assigned and it piqued the interest of anyone in a trench coat and fedora.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Create an image of a Rhode Island cityscape with recognizable brutalist architecture. In the foreground, depict several private investigator offices with stark concrete exteriors and minimalist signage, adorned with magnifying glasses and detective hats as decorations. In the background, show a bustling city with people walking around. Meanwhile, in a nearby park, illustrate little Marcella and her friends playing detective, using magnifying glasses and searching for hidden treasures. The scene should capture the contrast between the serious, professional detective offices and the whimsical, imaginative play of the children in the park. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Marcella and The number of private detectives in Rhode Island. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Vaporwave Scalar art Cyber folk Brutalism Woodblock painting
ChatGPT: Brutalism

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Marcella and The number of private detectives in Rhode Island, in the following situation: The number of private detectives in Rhode Island increased because as the name Marcella became more popular, more parents subconsciously instilled sleuthing skills in their children, leading to a surge in amateur detective work and a subsequent rise in demand for professional private investigators.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling Rhode Island city, we see a growing number of private detectives setting up shop, their offices adorned with magnifying glasses and detective hats. Meanwhile, in a nearby park, we see little Marcella playing detective with her friends, searching for hidden treasures. The increased popularity of the name Marcella seems to have sparked a newfound interest in detective activities, contributing to the surge in private detective numbers in the area.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Brutalism ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling Rhode Island city, we see a growing number of private detectives setting up shop, their offices adorned with magnifying glasses and detective hats. Meanwhile, in a nearby park, we see little Marcella playing detective with her friends, searching for hidden treasures. The increased popularity of the name Marcella seems to have sparked a newfound interest in detective activities, contributing to the surge in private detective numbers in the area. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Create an image of a Rhode Island cityscape with recognizable brutalist architecture. In the foreground, depict several private investigator offices with stark concrete exteriors and minimalist signage, adorned with magnifying glasses and detective hats as decorations. In the background, show a bustling city with people walking around. Meanwhile, in a nearby park, illustrate little Marcella and her friends playing detective, using magnifying glasses and searching for hidden treasures. The scene should capture the contrast between the serious, professional detective offices and the whimsical, imaginative play of the children in the park.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Marcella caused The number of private detectives in Rhode Island to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
The Curious Case of Marcella: Unraveling the Relationship between Name Popularity and Private Detectives in Rhode Island

The Journal of Uncommon Monikers and Investigative Practices

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Marcella and The number of private detectives in Rhode Island. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title a clever pun.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9230948 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2018.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Curious Case of Marcella: Unraveling the Relationship between Name Popularity and Private Detectives in Rhode Island

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a lighthearted yet surprisingly compelling investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Marcella" and the abundance of private detectives in the charming state of Rhode Island. Utilizing data obtained from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a curious quest to unravel this enigmatic connection.

Employing intricate statistical analyses, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9230948 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years spanning from 2003 to 2018. These findings not only sparked amusement within our team but also led to contemplation about the uncharted avenues through which the moniker "Marcella" could potentially influence the demand for sleuths in the Ocean State.

Thus, our study paves the way for future investigations into the whimsical intertwining of nomenclature and occupational dynamics, offering a delightful blend of merriment and scholarly inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Marcella and The number of private detectives in Rhode Island. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Curious Case of Marcella: Unraveling the Relationship between Name Popularity and Private Detectives in Rhode Island

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a lighthearted yet surprisingly compelling investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Marcella" and the abundance of private detectives in the charming state of Rhode Island. Utilizing data obtained from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a curious quest to unravel this enigmatic connection.

Employing intricate statistical analyses, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9230948 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years spanning from 2003 to 2018. These findings not only sparked amusement within our team but also led to contemplation about the uncharted avenues through which the moniker "Marcella" could potentially influence the demand for sleuths in the Ocean State.

Thus, our study paves the way for future investigations into the whimsical intertwining of nomenclature and occupational dynamics, offering a delightful blend of merriment and scholarly inquiry.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:

Ladies and gentlemen of the esteemed academic community, as we embark on this merry academic journey, let us delve into the whimsical world of name popularity and the clandestine realm of private detectives, where rhyme and reason may unfold a curious correlation beyond the reach of mere logic.

Imagine the astonishment that befell our research team as we stumbled upon an unexpected connection between the prevalence of the first name "Marcella" and the number of Sherlock Holmes enthusiasts—err, private detectives—crawling through the charming streets of Rhode Island! Indeed, it appears that, much like a captivating mystery novel, this peculiar correlation has left us both perplexed and tickled pink with curiosity.

As intrepid researchers, we could not resist the temptation to investigate this enigmatic enigma (yes, a triple syllable pun; do try and keep up!). Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a quest that would rival even the most riveting tale from Agatha Christie.

With the gusto of seasoned detectives, we scrutinized the statistical relationship between the popularity of the name "Marcella" and the proliferation of private eye agencies across the so-called Ocean State. Lo and behold, our perspicacious pursuits unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9230948 and a p-value that would make even the most skeptical statistician raise an eyebrow—a mere <0.01, no less!

This revelation not only provoked laughter and disbelief within our ranks but also sparked a shower of puns about the "Marcella-Mystery" and the "Sherlock-name Connection." (Note to self: copyright these puns before they vanish like the clues in a convoluted whodunit.)

So, here we are, dear scholars and skeptics, standing at the intersection of nomenclature and occupational dynamics, pondering the profound question: does the name "Marcella" possess an inexplicable allure that beckons the beady-eyed sleuths of Rhode Island? Join us, as we sally forth into the unexplored domain of amusing academic inquiry, armed with curiosity and copious amounts of caffeinated beverages!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Marcella and The number of private detectives in Rhode Island. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Curious Case of Marcella: Unraveling the Relationship between Name Popularity and Private Detectives in Rhode Island

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a lighthearted yet surprisingly compelling investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Marcella" and the abundance of private detectives in the charming state of Rhode Island. Utilizing data obtained from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a curious quest to unravel this enigmatic connection.

Employing intricate statistical analyses, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9230948 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years spanning from 2003 to 2018. These findings not only sparked amusement within our team but also led to contemplation about the uncharted avenues through which the moniker "Marcella" could potentially influence the demand for sleuths in the Ocean State.

Thus, our study paves the way for future investigations into the whimsical intertwining of nomenclature and occupational dynamics, offering a delightful blend of merriment and scholarly inquiry.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen of the esteemed academic community, as we embark on this merry academic journey, let us delve into the whimsical world of name popularity and the clandestine realm of private detectives, where rhyme and reason may unfold a curious correlation beyond the reach of mere logic.
Imagine the astonishment that befell our research team as we stumbled upon an unexpected connection between the prevalence of the first name "Marcella" and the number of Sherlock Holmes enthusiasts—err, private detectives—crawling through the charming streets of Rhode Island! Indeed, it appears that, much like a captivating mystery novel, this peculiar correlation has left us both perplexed and tickled pink with curiosity.
As intrepid researchers, we could not resist the temptation to investigate this enigmatic enigma (yes, a triple syllable pun; do try and keep up!). Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a quest that would rival even the most riveting tale from Agatha Christie.
With the gusto of seasoned detectives, we scrutinized the statistical relationship between the popularity of the name "Marcella" and the proliferation of private eye agencies across the so-called Ocean State. Lo and behold, our perspicacious pursuits unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9230948 and a p-value that would make even the most skeptical statistician raise an eyebrow—a mere <0.01, no less!
This revelation not only provoked laughter and disbelief within our ranks but also sparked a shower of puns about the "Marcella-Mystery" and the "Sherlock-name Connection." (Note to self: copyright these puns before they vanish like the clues in a convoluted whodunit.)
So, here we are, dear scholars and skeptics, standing at the intersection of nomenclature and occupational dynamics, pondering the profound question: does the name "Marcella" possess an inexplicable allure that beckons the beady-eyed sleuths of Rhode Island? Join us, as we sally forth into the unexplored domain of amusing academic inquiry, armed with curiosity and copious amounts of caffeinated beverages!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find a positively perplexing correlation between the popularity of the first name "Marcella" and the number of private detectives in Rhode Island. This unexpected discovery has prompted whimsical musings among the scholarly community and injected a dose of levity into the often serious realm of statistical analysis. As we journey deeper into this curious conundrum, we must consider the potential influences of nomenclature on occupational choices and the likelihood of chance associations masquerading as inexplicable correlations.

Delving into the annals of non-fiction literature, one cannot help but ponder the profound implications of "Freakonomics" by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner. Could the unconventional allure of the name "Marcella" be akin to the baffling phenomena explored within the pages of this unconventional masterpiece? Furthermore, "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell may shed light on the instantaneous judgments individuals make based on names, subtly shaping their career paths in mysterious ways.

Turning to the world of fiction, one cannot dismiss the influence of Agatha Christie's gripping mysteries, where the unexpected twists and turns mirror the enigmatic correlation we seek to unravel. Could "Marcella" hold the answer to a peculiar puzzle reminiscent of the intricate plots found within "The Hound of the Baskervilles" by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle? We cannot discount the possibility that the name "Marcella" has woven an enticing web of intrigue, inducing individuals to pursue a career as a modern-day Sherlock Holmes.

In a daring departure from traditional scholarly pursuits, let us not overlook the whimsical influence of timeless cartoons and children's shows. After all, how many future private detectives were inspired by the tenacious spirit of Detective Conan from the eponymous anime series? Did the mischievous escapades of Carmen Sandiego spark a yearning for adventure and investigative prowess in those bearing the name "Marcella"? These fanciful considerations may appear lighthearted, but they underscore the multifaceted nature of our investigation, where the intersection of name popularity and the detective profession exceeds the bounds of mere statistical analyses.

As we navigate this delightful detour into the correlation between the name "Marcella" and private detectives in Rhode Island, one cannot help but embrace the whimsy that accompanies our academic inquiries. The meandering path we tread is peppered with unexpected twists and amusing insights, inviting us to embrace the cheery blend of scholarly pursuit and the inexplicable allure of a seemingly innocuous name.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Marcella and The number of private detectives in Rhode Island. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2018

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Curious Case of Marcella: Unraveling the Relationship between Name Popularity and Private Detectives in Rhode Island

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a lighthearted yet surprisingly compelling investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Marcella" and the abundance of private detectives in the charming state of Rhode Island. Utilizing data obtained from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a curious quest to unravel this enigmatic connection.

Employing intricate statistical analyses, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9230948 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years spanning from 2003 to 2018. These findings not only sparked amusement within our team but also led to contemplation about the uncharted avenues through which the moniker "Marcella" could potentially influence the demand for sleuths in the Ocean State.

Thus, our study paves the way for future investigations into the whimsical intertwining of nomenclature and occupational dynamics, offering a delightful blend of merriment and scholarly inquiry.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen of the esteemed academic community, as we embark on this merry academic journey, let us delve into the whimsical world of name popularity and the clandestine realm of private detectives, where rhyme and reason may unfold a curious correlation beyond the reach of mere logic.
Imagine the astonishment that befell our research team as we stumbled upon an unexpected connection between the prevalence of the first name "Marcella" and the number of Sherlock Holmes enthusiasts—err, private detectives—crawling through the charming streets of Rhode Island! Indeed, it appears that, much like a captivating mystery novel, this peculiar correlation has left us both perplexed and tickled pink with curiosity.
As intrepid researchers, we could not resist the temptation to investigate this enigmatic enigma (yes, a triple syllable pun; do try and keep up!). Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a quest that would rival even the most riveting tale from Agatha Christie.
With the gusto of seasoned detectives, we scrutinized the statistical relationship between the popularity of the name "Marcella" and the proliferation of private eye agencies across the so-called Ocean State. Lo and behold, our perspicacious pursuits unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9230948 and a p-value that would make even the most skeptical statistician raise an eyebrow—a mere <0.01, no less!
This revelation not only provoked laughter and disbelief within our ranks but also sparked a shower of puns about the "Marcella-Mystery" and the "Sherlock-name Connection." (Note to self: copyright these puns before they vanish like the clues in a convoluted whodunit.)
So, here we are, dear scholars and skeptics, standing at the intersection of nomenclature and occupational dynamics, pondering the profound question: does the name "Marcella" possess an inexplicable allure that beckons the beady-eyed sleuths of Rhode Island? Join us, as we sally forth into the unexplored domain of amusing academic inquiry, armed with curiosity and copious amounts of caffeinated beverages!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

The raucous revelry of our findings aside, our methodology for this study was as rigorous as it was whimsical. First, we embarked on a digital conquest through the labyrinthine corridors of the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Our intrepid team of researchers scoured the electronic archives like eager treasure hunters in pursuit of the elusive data spanning from 2003 to 2018, ensuring that not a single byte was left unturned in our pursuit of statistical merriment.

Once the cornucopia of data had been gathered, we engaged in a rollicking tango with statistical software that would make even the most ardent dancer blush. We utilized a complex combination of regression analyses, time-series modeling, and intricate manipulations of what statisticians call "variables" but what we prefer to refer to as "Sherlockian suspects" - yes, we do love a good pun!

Our pursuit of correlation led us to dabble in Pearson's r, Spearman’s ρ, and even the fabled Kendall’s τ. As we delved into these arcane arts of statistical analysis, we couldn't help but marvel at the perplexing dance of numbers and hypotheses, reminiscent of a dignified quadrille at a scholarly ball—but with a greater propensity for spontaneous bursts of guffaws and muffled giggles erupting from the laboratory.

Ultimately, our methodology bore testimony to our invigorating fascination with the whimsical, the enigmatic, and yes, the shamelessly punny. Our statistical inquiries transcended the mundane, unveiling the improbable connection between a name and the spread of private detectives in Rhode Island. So, dear colleagues, let us raise our test tubes to the pursuit of merriment and scholarly inquiry! Cheers to the curious case of Marcella and the unexpected romance between nomenclature and sleuthing!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Marcella and The number of private detectives in Rhode Island. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2018, you found a correlation 0.9230948, r-squared of 0.8521040, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Curious Case of Marcella: Unraveling the Relationship between Name Popularity and Private Detectives in Rhode Island

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a lighthearted yet surprisingly compelling investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Marcella" and the abundance of private detectives in the charming state of Rhode Island. Utilizing data obtained from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a curious quest to unravel this enigmatic connection.

Employing intricate statistical analyses, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9230948 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years spanning from 2003 to 2018. These findings not only sparked amusement within our team but also led to contemplation about the uncharted avenues through which the moniker "Marcella" could potentially influence the demand for sleuths in the Ocean State.

Thus, our study paves the way for future investigations into the whimsical intertwining of nomenclature and occupational dynamics, offering a delightful blend of merriment and scholarly inquiry.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ladies and gentlemen of the esteemed academic community, as we embark on this merry academic journey, let us delve into the whimsical world of name popularity and the clandestine realm of private detectives, where rhyme and reason may unfold a curious correlation beyond the reach of mere logic.
Imagine the astonishment that befell our research team as we stumbled upon an unexpected connection between the prevalence of the first name "Marcella" and the number of Sherlock Holmes enthusiasts—err, private detectives—crawling through the charming streets of Rhode Island! Indeed, it appears that, much like a captivating mystery novel, this peculiar correlation has left us both perplexed and tickled pink with curiosity.
As intrepid researchers, we could not resist the temptation to investigate this enigmatic enigma (yes, a triple syllable pun; do try and keep up!). Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a quest that would rival even the most riveting tale from Agatha Christie.
With the gusto of seasoned detectives, we scrutinized the statistical relationship between the popularity of the name "Marcella" and the proliferation of private eye agencies across the so-called Ocean State. Lo and behold, our perspicacious pursuits unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9230948 and a p-value that would make even the most skeptical statistician raise an eyebrow—a mere <0.01, no less!
This revelation not only provoked laughter and disbelief within our ranks but also sparked a shower of puns about the "Marcella-Mystery" and the "Sherlock-name Connection." (Note to self: copyright these puns before they vanish like the clues in a convoluted whodunit.)
So, here we are, dear scholars and skeptics, standing at the intersection of nomenclature and occupational dynamics, pondering the profound question: does the name "Marcella" possess an inexplicable allure that beckons the beady-eyed sleuths of Rhode Island? Join us, as we sally forth into the unexplored domain of amusing academic inquiry, armed with curiosity and copious amounts of caffeinated beverages!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Marcella" and the number of private detectives in Rhode Island have left us not only bemused but also giddy with the delightful discovery of a profound statistical relationship. With our trusty statistical tools in hand, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9230948, indicating a robust association between these seemingly disparate variables.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8521040 reflects the impressive degree to which the variability in the number of private detectives in Rhode Island can be explained by the popularity of the name "Marcella." This closely knit relationship was not merely a whimsical figment of our imagination, but a statistically significant phenomenon, with a p-value of less than 0.01.

To illustrate this compelling connection, we proudly present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the strong correlation between the prevalence of the name "Marcella" and the abundance of private detectives in the quaint state of Rhode Island. This figure serves as a whimsical testament to the unexpected intertwining of nomenclature and occupational dynamics, providing a visual feast for the eyes and a hearty chuckle for the statistically inclined.

In essence, our investigation has shed light on the enthralling nexus between the moniker "Marcella" and the demand for gumshoes in the Ocean State, adding a touch of levity to the typically solemn realm of empirical inquiry. As we eagerly anticipate future research ventures into this captivating conundrum, we invite fellow scholars to join us in reveling in the delightful fusion of merriment and scholarly exploration.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Marcella and The number of private detectives in Rhode Island. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
The Curious Case of Marcella: Unraveling the Relationship between Name Popularity and Private Detectives in Rhode Island

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a lighthearted yet surprisingly compelling investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Marcella" and the abundance of private detectives in the charming state of Rhode Island. Utilizing data obtained from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a curious quest to unravel this enigmatic connection.

Employing intricate statistical analyses, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9230948 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years spanning from 2003 to 2018. These findings not only sparked amusement within our team but also led to contemplation about the uncharted avenues through which the moniker "Marcella" could potentially influence the demand for sleuths in the Ocean State.

Thus, our study paves the way for future investigations into the whimsical intertwining of nomenclature and occupational dynamics, offering a delightful blend of merriment and scholarly inquiry.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find a positively perplexing correlation between the popularity of the first name "Marcella" and the number of private detectives in Rhode Island. This unexpected discovery has prompted whimsical musings among the scholarly community and injected a dose of levity into the often serious realm of statistical analysis. As we journey deeper into this curious conundrum, we must consider the potential influences of nomenclature on occupational choices and the likelihood of chance associations masquerading as inexplicable correlations.
Delving into the annals of non-fiction literature, one cannot help but ponder the profound implications of "Freakonomics" by Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner. Could the unconventional allure of the name "Marcella" be akin to the baffling phenomena explored within the pages of this unconventional masterpiece? Furthermore, "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell may shed light on the instantaneous judgments individuals make based on names, subtly shaping their career paths in mysterious ways.
Turning to the world of fiction, one cannot dismiss the influence of Agatha Christie's gripping mysteries, where the unexpected twists and turns mirror the enigmatic correlation we seek to unravel. Could "Marcella" hold the answer to a peculiar puzzle reminiscent of the intricate plots found within "The Hound of the Baskervilles" by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle? We cannot discount the possibility that the name "Marcella" has woven an enticing web of intrigue, inducing individuals to pursue a career as a modern-day Sherlock Holmes.
In a daring departure from traditional scholarly pursuits, let us not overlook the whimsical influence of timeless cartoons and children's shows. After all, how many future private detectives were inspired by the tenacious spirit of Detective Conan from the eponymous anime series? Did the mischievous escapades of Carmen Sandiego spark a yearning for adventure and investigative prowess in those bearing the name "Marcella"? These fanciful considerations may appear lighthearted, but they underscore the multifaceted nature of our investigation, where the intersection of name popularity and the detective profession exceeds the bounds of mere statistical analyses.
As we navigate this delightful detour into the correlation between the name "Marcella" and private detectives in Rhode Island, one cannot help but embrace the whimsy that accompanies our academic inquiries. The meandering path we tread is peppered with unexpected twists and amusing insights, inviting us to embrace the cheery blend of scholarly pursuit and the inexplicable allure of a seemingly innocuous name.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Marcella" and the number of private detectives in Rhode Island have left us not only bemused but also giddy with the delightful discovery of a profound statistical relationship. With our trusty statistical tools in hand, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9230948, indicating a robust association between these seemingly disparate variables.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8521040 reflects the impressive degree to which the variability in the number of private detectives in Rhode Island can be explained by the popularity of the name "Marcella." This closely knit relationship was not merely a whimsical figment of our imagination, but a statistically significant phenomenon, with a p-value of less than 0.01.
To illustrate this compelling connection, we proudly present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the strong correlation between the prevalence of the name "Marcella" and the abundance of private detectives in the quaint state of Rhode Island. This figure serves as a whimsical testament to the unexpected intertwining of nomenclature and occupational dynamics, providing a visual feast for the eyes and a hearty chuckle for the statistically inclined.
In essence, our investigation has shed light on the enthralling nexus between the moniker "Marcella" and the demand for gumshoes in the Ocean State, adding a touch of levity to the typically solemn realm of empirical inquiry. As we eagerly anticipate future research ventures into this captivating conundrum, we invite fellow scholars to join us in reveling in the delightful fusion of merriment and scholarly exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our findings have cascaded onto the scholarly stage, revealing a rib-tickling correlation between the name "Marcella" and the number of private detectives in the charming state of Rhode Island. With a correlation coefficient that's as snug as a bug in a rug at 0.9230948, and a p-value that's rarer than a unicorn sighting at < 0.01, we couldn't help but marvel at the statistical tango performed by these seemingly unrelated variables.

Harkening back to the peculiar ponderings of Smith et al., the positively perplexing correlation they stumbled upon has now been jauntily jived with by our own uproariously robust findings. This reinforces the vibrant hypothesis that name prominence and occupational predilections might share a rather whimsical waltz, where a simple moniker like "Marcella" can unwittingly sway the career choices of aspiring sleuths in Rhode Island.

Drawing from the exuberant musings of "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner, one could almost envisage a soundtrack of detective-themed puns and serendipitous snooping tunes accompanying our statistical revelations. Furthermore, Malcolm Gladwell's "Blink" seems to have worked its mysterious magic, as our data danced to the beguiling beat of instantaneous judgments influenced by the enchanting allure of a name.

Perhaps, the influence of Agatha Christie's captivating mysteries and Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's enigmatic plots has seeped into the fabric of our findings, imbuing them with an air of intrigue and suspense. It's almost as if "Marcella" has woven a clandestine web of mystique, enticing future Poirots and Sherlocks to don their metaphorical deerstalkers and embark on a puzzling investigation of their own.

In a daring dash of brilliance, we must acknowledge the whimsical influence of timeless cartoons and children's shows in this scholarly escapade. After all, who's to say that the indomitable spirit of Detective Conan or the globe-trotting escapades of Carmen Sandiego didn't slyly whisper into the ears of budding "Marcellas," prompting them to unravel mysteries and seek adventure through the whimsy of private detection?

In essence, our research boldly strides into the hallowed halls of scholarly pursuits, not merely as a dry statistical conjecture but as a spirited dance of merriment and inquiry. With a nod to the influential jesters of academia who have paved the way for our own mirthful revelations, our exploration embraces the vibrant interplay of statistical rigour and the inexplicable allure of a seemingly ordinary name. And as we eagerly anticipate the future fandangos of research into this captivating conundrum, we invite fellow scholars to twirl and tango amidst the merry blend of scholarly pursuit and delightful whimsy. Cheers to the enigmatic allure of Marcella and the intrepid gumshoes of Rhode Island!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Marcella and The number of private detectives in Rhode Island. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Curious Case of Marcella: Unraveling the Relationship between Name Popularity and Private Detectives in Rhode Island

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study presents a lighthearted yet surprisingly compelling investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Marcella" and the abundance of private detectives in the charming state of Rhode Island. Utilizing data obtained from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a curious quest to unravel this enigmatic connection.

Employing intricate statistical analyses, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9230948 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years spanning from 2003 to 2018. These findings not only sparked amusement within our team but also led to contemplation about the uncharted avenues through which the moniker "Marcella" could potentially influence the demand for sleuths in the Ocean State.

Thus, our study paves the way for future investigations into the whimsical intertwining of nomenclature and occupational dynamics, offering a delightful blend of merriment and scholarly inquiry.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ladies and gentlemen of the esteemed academic community, as we embark on this merry academic journey, let us delve into the whimsical world of name popularity and the clandestine realm of private detectives, where rhyme and reason may unfold a curious correlation beyond the reach of mere logic.
Imagine the astonishment that befell our research team as we stumbled upon an unexpected connection between the prevalence of the first name "Marcella" and the number of Sherlock Holmes enthusiasts—err, private detectives—crawling through the charming streets of Rhode Island! Indeed, it appears that, much like a captivating mystery novel, this peculiar correlation has left us both perplexed and tickled pink with curiosity.
As intrepid researchers, we could not resist the temptation to investigate this enigmatic enigma (yes, a triple syllable pun; do try and keep up!). Armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, we embarked on a quest that would rival even the most riveting tale from Agatha Christie.
With the gusto of seasoned detectives, we scrutinized the statistical relationship between the popularity of the name "Marcella" and the proliferation of private eye agencies across the so-called Ocean State. Lo and behold, our perspicacious pursuits unveiled a correlation coefficient of 0.9230948 and a p-value that would make even the most skeptical statistician raise an eyebrow—a mere <0.01, no less!
This revelation not only provoked laughter and disbelief within our ranks but also sparked a shower of puns about the "Marcella-Mystery" and the "Sherlock-name Connection." (Note to self: copyright these puns before they vanish like the clues in a convoluted whodunit.)
So, here we are, dear scholars and skeptics, standing at the intersection of nomenclature and occupational dynamics, pondering the profound question: does the name "Marcella" possess an inexplicable allure that beckons the beady-eyed sleuths of Rhode Island? Join us, as we sally forth into the unexplored domain of amusing academic inquiry, armed with curiosity and copious amounts of caffeinated beverages!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Marcella" and the number of private detectives in Rhode Island have left us not only bemused but also giddy with the delightful discovery of a profound statistical relationship. With our trusty statistical tools in hand, we uncovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9230948, indicating a robust association between these seemingly disparate variables.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.8521040 reflects the impressive degree to which the variability in the number of private detectives in Rhode Island can be explained by the popularity of the name "Marcella." This closely knit relationship was not merely a whimsical figment of our imagination, but a statistically significant phenomenon, with a p-value of less than 0.01.
To illustrate this compelling connection, we proudly present Fig. 1, a scatterplot that visually encapsulates the strong correlation between the prevalence of the name "Marcella" and the abundance of private detectives in the quaint state of Rhode Island. This figure serves as a whimsical testament to the unexpected intertwining of nomenclature and occupational dynamics, providing a visual feast for the eyes and a hearty chuckle for the statistically inclined.
In essence, our investigation has shed light on the enthralling nexus between the moniker "Marcella" and the demand for gumshoes in the Ocean State, adding a touch of levity to the typically solemn realm of empirical inquiry. As we eagerly anticipate future research ventures into this captivating conundrum, we invite fellow scholars to join us in reveling in the delightful fusion of merriment and scholarly exploration.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our findings have delighted and perplexed us in equal measure, much like a magician who pulls a rabbit out of an enigma. The robust statistical relationship between the popularity of the first name "Marcella" and the number of private detectives in Rhode Island is a charming riddle that tickles the synapses of our scholarly minds.

This merry correlation, with a coefficient so strong it could bench-press statistical norms, and a p-value so tiny it could hide beneath an atomic nucleus, leaves us pondering the whimsical ways in which nomenclature could influence the demand for sleuths. It's as if a bewitching spell cast by the name "Marcella" beckons Rhode Island to whisper its mysteries to those with keen eyes and a magnifying glass.

As we wrap up our investigation, it's clear that the old adage "What's in a name?" may hold more weight than originally thought, possibly a few kilos of statistical significance and a metric ton of bemusement.

Therefore, we unequivocally assert that no further research is needed in this area. The Marcella-mystery shall remain an amusing enigma for the ages, a delightful footnote in the annals of scholarly inquiry, and a reminder that even the most rigorous research can embark on a joyous adventure through the unexpected corridors of human curiosity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Curious Case of Marcella: Unraveling the Relationship between Name Popularity and Private Detectives in Rhode Island. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Uncommon Monikers and Investigative Practices


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Curious Case of Marcella: Unraveling the Relationship between Name Popularity and Private Detectives in Rhode Island. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Socio-Sleuth Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Curious Case of Marcella: Unraveling the Relationship between Name Popularity and Private Detectives in Rhode Island with an abstract of This study presents a lighthearted yet surprisingly compelling investigation into the correlation between the popularity of the first name "Marcella" and the abundance of private detectives in the charming state of Rhode Island. Utilizing data obtained from the US Social Security Administration and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, our research team embarked on a curious quest to unravel this enigmatic connection.
Employing intricate statistical analyses, we discovered a remarkable correlation coefficient of 0.9230948 and a statistically significant p-value of < 0.01 for the years spanning from 2003 to 2018. These findings not only sparked amusement within our team but also led to contemplation about the uncharted avenues through which the moniker "Marcella" could potentially influence the demand for sleuths in the Ocean State.
Thus, our study paves the way for future investigations into the whimsical intertwining of nomenclature and occupational dynamics, offering a delightful blend of merriment and scholarly inquiry.

ChatGPT:

Marcella, name popularity, private detectives, Rhode Island, correlation, US Social Security Administration, Bureau of Labor Statistics, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, occupational dynamics, nomenclature, Rhode Island detectives

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Marcella
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Marcella
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Marcella

The number of private detectives in Rhode Island
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of private detectives and investigators in Rhode Island
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of private detectives in Rhode Island

Correlation r = 0.9230948 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8521040 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 85.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of private detectives in Rhode Island) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Marcella) over the 16 years from 2003 through 2018.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.5E-7. 0.0000003475124995540416000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.92 in 3.5E-5% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,877,594 random variables You don't actually need 2 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.79, 0.97 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018
Popularity of the first name Marcella (Babies born)197195174194184186168155172168161159170196228231
The number of private detectives in Rhode Island (Laborers)901007010080605050707060405080210210




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([197,195,174,194,184,186,168,155,172,168,161,159,170,196,228,231,])
array_2 = np.array([90,100,70,100,80,60,50,50,70,70,60,40,50,80,210,210,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Marcella"
array_2_name = "The number of private detectives in Rhode Island"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating skills are top-notch!


Correlation ID: 2689 · Black Variable ID: 3759 · Red Variable ID: 13896
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0