Download png, svg
AI explanation
As household spending on eggs rose, families were scrambling to make more omelettes, leading to an increased demand for cooking oil. This surge in demand sunny-side upped the profits for oil companies, including those connected to The Goldman Sachs Group, leading to a eggs-traordinary increase in their stock price. The sunny side of this story is that it cracked the expectations of Wall Street analysts, who realized that the situation was no yolk, and that The Goldman Sachs Group was on their way to shell-tering some impressive profits.Model: dalle-3
Prompt: **Prompt:** Create a photo-realistic image of a sunny breakfast table with a carton of eggs and a newspaper showcasing The Goldman Sachs Group's rising stock price. A family is gathered around, smiling and enjoying a hearty breakfast, conveying their excitement as US household spending on eggs increases. Their sunny-side up outlook leads to a sense of optimism, culminating in increased investments and a glowing GS stock chart in the background. The scene is filled with positive vibes and joy. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Annual US household spending on eggs and The Goldman Sachs Group's stock price (GS). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Realistic An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie Cute 2D animation Macabre A photo-realistic image
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Annual US household spending on eggs and The Goldman Sachs Group's stock price (GS), in the following situation: Because as US households spent more on eggs, they had to shell out more money for breakfast which made them egg-cited about the day, leading to positive vibes and a sunny-side up outlook. This sunny-side up attitude led to more investments, increasing GS stock price.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: Imagine a sunny breakfast table with a carton of eggs and a newspaper showcasing The Goldman Sachs Group's rising stock price. A family is gathered around, smiling and enjoying a hearty breakfast, depicting their excitement as US household spending on eggs increases. The scene is filled with positive vibes as the family's sunny-side up outlook leads to a sense of optimism, culminating in increased investments and a glowing GS stock chart in the background.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: Imagine a sunny breakfast table with a carton of eggs and a newspaper showcasing The Goldman Sachs Group's rising stock price. A family is gathered around, smiling and enjoying a hearty breakfast, depicting their excitement as US household spending on eggs increases. The scene is filled with positive vibes as the family's sunny-side up outlook leads to a sense of optimism, culminating in increased investments and a glowing GS stock chart in the background. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: **Prompt:** Create a photo-realistic image of a sunny breakfast table with a carton of eggs and a newspaper showcasing The Goldman Sachs Group's rising stock price. A family is gathered around, smiling and enjoying a hearty breakfast, conveying their excitement as US household spending on eggs increases. Their sunny-side up outlook leads to a sense of optimism, culminating in increased investments and a glowing GS stock chart in the background. The scene is filled with positive vibes and joy.
*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.
I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Annual US household spending on eggs caused The Goldman Sachs Group's stock price (GS) to increase. Include one good pun.
AI academic paper
The Sunny-Side Up Connection: Clucking Good News for Eggspanding Portfolios The Poultry Finance Quarterly Jan 2024 Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real! |
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on eggs and The Goldman Sachs Group's stock price (GS). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Make the title seem clever.
Your research team used data from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8471076 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.
Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)
[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
The Sunny-Side Up Connection: Clucking Good News for Eggspanding Portfolios
[[ABSTRACT]]
Eggs-amine the eggs-traordinary connection between annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group (GS). Through an eggshaustive analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) data spanning from 2002 to 2022, this study cracks open the sunny-side up truth behind this eggstremely clucktivating relationship. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8471076 and p < 0.01, lending huevos to the hypothesis that eggspenditures and GS stock price move in tandem. In shell, this research lays bare the eggceptional influence of eggconomy on investment, making it an eggsquisite area for further study. This eggceptional discovery is no yolk!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on eggs and The Goldman Sachs Group's stock price (GS). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Sunny-Side Up Connection: Clucking Good News for Eggspanding Portfolios
[[ABSTRACT]]
Eggs-amine the eggs-traordinary connection between annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group (GS). Through an eggshaustive analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) data spanning from 2002 to 2022, this study cracks open the sunny-side up truth behind this eggstremely clucktivating relationship. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8471076 and p < 0.01, lending huevos to the hypothesis that eggspenditures and GS stock price move in tandem. In shell, this research lays bare the eggceptional influence of eggconomy on investment, making it an eggsquisite area for further study. This eggceptional discovery is no yolk!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The perplexing relationship between seemingly disparate metrics has long been a topic of interest in the world of finance. One such intriguing connection lies within the annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group (GS). It may seem rather egg-centric, but our shell-shocking discovery unveils an ova-rching theme that transcends the boundaries of traditional investment analysis.
As we delve into this oeufbeat subject, it is crucial to consider the practical implications of our findings. After all, there's no use in crying over spilled milk when you've got a dozen eggs in the fridge! Our research aims to crack the shell of mystery surrounding this peculiar relationship and separate the eggstraordinary from the sunny-side-up claims.
In the world of finance, one expects to find correlations between supply and demand, market performance, and economic indicators. But who would have thought that the humble egg, a symbol of both delicious breakfasts and delicate balance, could be tied to the movements of a major financial institution's stock? It's no yolk - the connection between eggs and stock prices is egg-ceptionally egg-squisite!
Stay tuned for the egg-straordinary journey ahead as we embark on a voyage of discovery into the fascinating world of eggonomics and stock market dynamics. On this eggventure, we'll uncover the sunny-side up connection that promises to scramble conventional wisdom and poach the interests of investors and eggthusiasts alike. And remember, don't put all your eggs in one basket – unless it's a basket of diversified investment options!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on eggs and The Goldman Sachs Group's stock price (GS). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.
Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.
Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Sunny-Side Up Connection: Clucking Good News for Eggspanding Portfolios
[[ABSTRACT]]
Eggs-amine the eggs-traordinary connection between annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group (GS). Through an eggshaustive analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) data spanning from 2002 to 2022, this study cracks open the sunny-side up truth behind this eggstremely clucktivating relationship. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8471076 and p < 0.01, lending huevos to the hypothesis that eggspenditures and GS stock price move in tandem. In shell, this research lays bare the eggceptional influence of eggconomy on investment, making it an eggsquisite area for further study. This eggceptional discovery is no yolk!
-------
And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The perplexing relationship between seemingly disparate metrics has long been a topic of interest in the world of finance. One such intriguing connection lies within the annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group (GS). It may seem rather egg-centric, but our shell-shocking discovery unveils an ova-rching theme that transcends the boundaries of traditional investment analysis.
As we delve into this oeufbeat subject, it is crucial to consider the practical implications of our findings. After all, there's no use in crying over spilled milk when you've got a dozen eggs in the fridge! Our research aims to crack the shell of mystery surrounding this peculiar relationship and separate the eggstraordinary from the sunny-side-up claims.
In the world of finance, one expects to find correlations between supply and demand, market performance, and economic indicators. But who would have thought that the humble egg, a symbol of both delicious breakfasts and delicate balance, could be tied to the movements of a major financial institution's stock? It's no yolk - the connection between eggs and stock prices is egg-ceptionally egg-squisite!
Stay tuned for the egg-straordinary journey ahead as we embark on a voyage of discovery into the fascinating world of eggonomics and stock market dynamics. On this eggventure, we'll uncover the sunny-side up connection that promises to scramble conventional wisdom and poach the interests of investors and eggthusiasts alike. And remember, don't put all your eggs in one basket – unless it's a basket of diversified investment options!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group (GS) has elicited considerable interest among researchers. In "Smith et al.," the authors find a direct relationship between eggspenditures and stock price volatility, suggesting that egg-themed economic indicators may have a more meaningful impact on financial markets than previously assumed.
Uniting the realms of finance and eggonomics, "Doe and Jones" note that eggspenses are not mere breakfast costs but rather influencers of investment behavior. The authors elaborate on the eggstraordinary implications of this connection, emphasizing the eggceptional significance of understanding eggspenditure patterns in relation to financial decision-making.
Moving beyond traditional scholarly works, the findings of "Eggbert and Yolkman" shed light on the eggstensive influence of egg-related consumer behavior on market sentiment and stock performance. Their study conveys the eggcitement of uncovering untapped dimensions of economic analysis, demonstrating the eggspansive potential for unconventional indicators in evaluating investment strategies.
Shifting gears to the realm of literature and popular culture, books such as "Eggonomics 101: A Yolk of Financial Wisdom" and "The Nest Egg Principle: How Eggheads Are Ruling the Stock Market" offer intriguing perspectives on the intersection of eggonomics and financial markets. These eggstravagant titles serve as a reminder that even in the world of high finance, the humble egg can crack open new insights and provoke eggciting discourse.
Turning to fiction, the novel "Eggstravagance and Stock Schemes" presents a whimsical tale of a secret society of egg enthusiasts who clandestinely influence stock prices through their egg-based rituals. While purely fictional, this work contributes to the humorous portrayal of the egg-centric fascination that occasionally permeates the world of investment and market speculation.
Furthermore, social media platforms have played a role in disseminating lighthearted yet insightful observations on the eggspenditure-stock price relationship. In a tweet by @EggcellentInvestor, the user humorously remarked, "Investing in eggs and GS stocks – talk about a balanced breakfast! #EggstraordinaryReturns #SunnySideUpInvesting." Such online conversations reflect the widespread intrigue surrounding this curious association and the diverse interpretations it engenders.
In summary, the literature examining the connections between annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group encompasses a range of scholarly, literary, and social media sources. These diverse perspectives contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the eggspansive influence of egg-related indicators on financial markets, adding an eggstra layer of depth to the nuanced interplay between eggonomics and investment dynamics. Indeed, this field of study proves to be a delightful and eggciting pursuit, offering a veritable treasure trove of eggspertise and eggceptional pun opportunities.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on eggs and The Goldman Sachs Group's stock price (GS). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2022
Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.
Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Sunny-Side Up Connection: Clucking Good News for Eggspanding Portfolios
[[ABSTRACT]]
Eggs-amine the eggs-traordinary connection between annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group (GS). Through an eggshaustive analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) data spanning from 2002 to 2022, this study cracks open the sunny-side up truth behind this eggstremely clucktivating relationship. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8471076 and p < 0.01, lending huevos to the hypothesis that eggspenditures and GS stock price move in tandem. In shell, this research lays bare the eggceptional influence of eggconomy on investment, making it an eggsquisite area for further study. This eggceptional discovery is no yolk!
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The perplexing relationship between seemingly disparate metrics has long been a topic of interest in the world of finance. One such intriguing connection lies within the annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group (GS). It may seem rather egg-centric, but our shell-shocking discovery unveils an ova-rching theme that transcends the boundaries of traditional investment analysis.
As we delve into this oeufbeat subject, it is crucial to consider the practical implications of our findings. After all, there's no use in crying over spilled milk when you've got a dozen eggs in the fridge! Our research aims to crack the shell of mystery surrounding this peculiar relationship and separate the eggstraordinary from the sunny-side-up claims.
In the world of finance, one expects to find correlations between supply and demand, market performance, and economic indicators. But who would have thought that the humble egg, a symbol of both delicious breakfasts and delicate balance, could be tied to the movements of a major financial institution's stock? It's no yolk - the connection between eggs and stock prices is egg-ceptionally egg-squisite!
Stay tuned for the egg-straordinary journey ahead as we embark on a voyage of discovery into the fascinating world of eggonomics and stock market dynamics. On this eggventure, we'll uncover the sunny-side up connection that promises to scramble conventional wisdom and poach the interests of investors and eggthusiasts alike. And remember, don't put all your eggs in one basket – unless it's a basket of diversified investment options!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
ChatGPT:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
To unravel the eggstraordinary connection between annual US household spending on eggs and The Goldman Sachs Group's stock price (GS), this study employed a multifaceted approach that was as thorough as separating a yolky egg white from its shell. The first step of our research involved collecting data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), which was as meticulous as sifting through a carton of eggs for the perfect dozen.
The data from 2002 to 2022 was then meticulously scrubbed and processed, akin to the careful cracking of an egg to avoid any shell fragments. We calculated the annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group (GS) using ovo-lutionary statistical methods that were as precise as a chef measuring ingredients for a soufflé.
To assess the relationship between annual US household spending on eggs and The Goldman Sachs Group's stock price, we used a variety of analytical techniques, including regression analysis, correlation analysis, and econometric modeling. These methods were applied with the finesse of a master chef crafting a delicate soufflé, ensuring that our findings were as rich and satisfying as a perfectly cooked omelet.
Our analysis accounted for potential confounding variables, much like a chef carefully considers the balance of flavors in a complex dish. We also conducted robustness checks and sensitivity analyses to ensure that our findings were as reliable as a tried-and-true family recipe for fluffy scrambled eggs.
The resulting data was then scrambled, mixed, and folded in a statistical batter, producing a comprehensive analysis that was as satisfying as a well-prepared breakfast. Our methodology, much like a recipe for a perfect soufflé, was designed to ensure that our findings were as palatable and digestible as a perfectly cooked egg dish.
The statistical significance of our findings was then tested using a series of robustness checks and various statistical tests, ensuring that our conclusions were as solid as a hard-boiled egg. In the end, our methodology cracked open the shell of mystery surrounding the connection between annual US household spending on eggs and The Goldman Sachs Group's stock price, providing a sunny-side up glimpse into this clucking good relationship. Remember, when it comes to research methods, it's essential to break a few eggs to make a delicious omelet of knowledge!
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on eggs and The Goldman Sachs Group's stock price (GS). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .
For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8471076, r-squared of 0.7175912, and p < 0.01.
One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.
Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
The Sunny-Side Up Connection: Clucking Good News for Eggspanding Portfolios
[[ABSTRACT]]
Eggs-amine the eggs-traordinary connection between annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group (GS). Through an eggshaustive analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) data spanning from 2002 to 2022, this study cracks open the sunny-side up truth behind this eggstremely clucktivating relationship. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8471076 and p < 0.01, lending huevos to the hypothesis that eggspenditures and GS stock price move in tandem. In shell, this research lays bare the eggceptional influence of eggconomy on investment, making it an eggsquisite area for further study. This eggceptional discovery is no yolk!
-------
And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The perplexing relationship between seemingly disparate metrics has long been a topic of interest in the world of finance. One such intriguing connection lies within the annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group (GS). It may seem rather egg-centric, but our shell-shocking discovery unveils an ova-rching theme that transcends the boundaries of traditional investment analysis.
As we delve into this oeufbeat subject, it is crucial to consider the practical implications of our findings. After all, there's no use in crying over spilled milk when you've got a dozen eggs in the fridge! Our research aims to crack the shell of mystery surrounding this peculiar relationship and separate the eggstraordinary from the sunny-side-up claims.
In the world of finance, one expects to find correlations between supply and demand, market performance, and economic indicators. But who would have thought that the humble egg, a symbol of both delicious breakfasts and delicate balance, could be tied to the movements of a major financial institution's stock? It's no yolk - the connection between eggs and stock prices is egg-ceptionally egg-squisite!
Stay tuned for the egg-straordinary journey ahead as we embark on a voyage of discovery into the fascinating world of eggonomics and stock market dynamics. On this eggventure, we'll uncover the sunny-side up connection that promises to scramble conventional wisdom and poach the interests of investors and eggthusiasts alike. And remember, don't put all your eggs in one basket – unless it's a basket of diversified investment options!
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[RESULTS]]
ChatGPT:
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) revealed a striking correlation between annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group (GS) for the period 2002 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.8471076 indicates a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This suggests that as household spending on eggs increased, the stock price of GS also exhibited a tendency to rise. It's no yolk – these findings crack open a whole new avenue of investigation in the world of financial analysis.
The r-squared value of 0.7175912 demonstrates that 71.76% of the variability in GS stock price can be explained by the annual household spending on eggs. This robust value provides ample evidence to support the eggstraordinary influence of eggspenditures on the stock market dynamics of The Goldman Sachs Group. One might say that the relationship is as solid as a hard-boiled egg – undeniable and unshakeable.
Furthermore, the p-value being less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant at the 99% confidence level. This means that the likelihood of obtaining such a strong correlation by random chance is extremely low. In other words, it's as unlikely as finding a golden egg in a hen house – a rare and valuable discovery indeed.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive correlation between annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of GS. The data points form a positively sloped pattern, emphasizing the consistent relationship between the two variables. One might say that this relationship is as clear as an eggshell – transparent and unambiguous.
In conclusion, these findings lay bare the eggceptional influence of eggconomy on the stock market dynamics of The Goldman Sachs Group. This discovery provides a sunny-side up perspective on the impact of household spending on a major financial institution's stock price, offering eggstraordinary insights for investors and researchers alike. This research sets the stage for further exploration into the eggciting world of eggonomics and its implications for investment strategies. This discovery is certainly no yolk – it's an eggciting breakthrough in the world of financial analysis and investment.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on eggs and The Goldman Sachs Group's stock price (GS). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 500 tokens.
Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.
Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.
[[TITLE]]
The Sunny-Side Up Connection: Clucking Good News for Eggspanding Portfolios
[[ABSTRACT]]
Eggs-amine the eggs-traordinary connection between annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group (GS). Through an eggshaustive analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) data spanning from 2002 to 2022, this study cracks open the sunny-side up truth behind this eggstremely clucktivating relationship. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8471076 and p < 0.01, lending huevos to the hypothesis that eggspenditures and GS stock price move in tandem. In shell, this research lays bare the eggceptional influence of eggconomy on investment, making it an eggsquisite area for further study. This eggceptional discovery is no yolk!
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The connection between annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group (GS) has elicited considerable interest among researchers. In "Smith et al.," the authors find a direct relationship between eggspenditures and stock price volatility, suggesting that egg-themed economic indicators may have a more meaningful impact on financial markets than previously assumed.
Uniting the realms of finance and eggonomics, "Doe and Jones" note that eggspenses are not mere breakfast costs but rather influencers of investment behavior. The authors elaborate on the eggstraordinary implications of this connection, emphasizing the eggceptional significance of understanding eggspenditure patterns in relation to financial decision-making.
Moving beyond traditional scholarly works, the findings of "Eggbert and Yolkman" shed light on the eggstensive influence of egg-related consumer behavior on market sentiment and stock performance. Their study conveys the eggcitement of uncovering untapped dimensions of economic analysis, demonstrating the eggspansive potential for unconventional indicators in evaluating investment strategies.
Shifting gears to the realm of literature and popular culture, books such as "Eggonomics 101: A Yolk of Financial Wisdom" and "The Nest Egg Principle: How Eggheads Are Ruling the Stock Market" offer intriguing perspectives on the intersection of eggonomics and financial markets. These eggstravagant titles serve as a reminder that even in the world of high finance, the humble egg can crack open new insights and provoke eggciting discourse.
Turning to fiction, the novel "Eggstravagance and Stock Schemes" presents a whimsical tale of a secret society of egg enthusiasts who clandestinely influence stock prices through their egg-based rituals. While purely fictional, this work contributes to the humorous portrayal of the egg-centric fascination that occasionally permeates the world of investment and market speculation.
Furthermore, social media platforms have played a role in disseminating lighthearted yet insightful observations on the eggspenditure-stock price relationship. In a tweet by @EggcellentInvestor, the user humorously remarked, "Investing in eggs and GS stocks – talk about a balanced breakfast! #EggstraordinaryReturns #SunnySideUpInvesting." Such online conversations reflect the widespread intrigue surrounding this curious association and the diverse interpretations it engenders.
In summary, the literature examining the connections between annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group encompasses a range of scholarly, literary, and social media sources. These diverse perspectives contribute to a comprehensive understanding of the eggspansive influence of egg-related indicators on financial markets, adding an eggstra layer of depth to the nuanced interplay between eggonomics and investment dynamics. Indeed, this field of study proves to be a delightful and eggciting pursuit, offering a veritable treasure trove of eggspertise and eggceptional pun opportunities.
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) revealed a striking correlation between annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group (GS) for the period 2002 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.8471076 indicates a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This suggests that as household spending on eggs increased, the stock price of GS also exhibited a tendency to rise. It's no yolk – these findings crack open a whole new avenue of investigation in the world of financial analysis.
The r-squared value of 0.7175912 demonstrates that 71.76% of the variability in GS stock price can be explained by the annual household spending on eggs. This robust value provides ample evidence to support the eggstraordinary influence of eggspenditures on the stock market dynamics of The Goldman Sachs Group. One might say that the relationship is as solid as a hard-boiled egg – undeniable and unshakeable.
Furthermore, the p-value being less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant at the 99% confidence level. This means that the likelihood of obtaining such a strong correlation by random chance is extremely low. In other words, it's as unlikely as finding a golden egg in a hen house – a rare and valuable discovery indeed.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive correlation between annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of GS. The data points form a positively sloped pattern, emphasizing the consistent relationship between the two variables. One might say that this relationship is as clear as an eggshell – transparent and unambiguous.
In conclusion, these findings lay bare the eggceptional influence of eggconomy on the stock market dynamics of The Goldman Sachs Group. This discovery provides a sunny-side up perspective on the impact of household spending on a major financial institution's stock price, offering eggstraordinary insights for investors and researchers alike. This research sets the stage for further exploration into the eggciting world of eggonomics and its implications for investment strategies. This discovery is certainly no yolk – it's an eggciting breakthrough in the world of financial analysis and investment.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[DISCUSSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[DISCUSSION]]
The results of this study provide eggstremely compelling evidence supporting the previously hypothesized relationships between annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group (GS). The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8471076 not only confirms but eggspands upon the findings of prior research, serving as a scrambled yet cohesive piece of the larger eggonomic puzzle. These results lend tangible support to the notion that eggspenditures and GS stock price move in tandem, cracking open a whole new realm of eggspertise in financial analysis.
The previous work of "Smith et al." highlighted the impact of eggspenditures on stock price volatility, laying the initial groundwork for understanding this eggstraordinary connection. Our findings echo this sentiment, demonstrating a similarly direct relationship between annual household spending on eggs and GS stock price dynamics. It seems that this relationship is as undeniable as the necessity of a good egg pun in eggstraordinary research – an integral part of the process.
Eggspanding upon the eggceptional work of "Doe and Jones," our study further underlines the eggstraordinary significance of egg-related indicators in financial decision-making. Just as they suggested, our results reveal the eggceptional influence of eggconomy on investment behavior, reinforcing the idea that eggspenditure patterns play a key role in market dynamics. It's clear that the intersection of eggspenses and financial markets is no yolk – it's a shell-shocking revelation in the world of investment analysis.
In line with the findings of "Eggbert and Yolkman," our study reaffirms the eggstensive influence of egg-related consumer behavior on market sentiment and stock performance. The robust r-squared value indicates that over 71% of the variability in GS stock price can be explained by annual household spending on eggs. This eggstraordinary explanatory power underscores the deep-rooted influence of eggspenditures on the stock market, making it an eggciting avenue for further exploration.
The statistically significant p-value further solidifies the eggceptional nature of this relationship, reaffirming the eggstensive impact of eggconomy on the stock market dynamics of The Goldman Sachs Group. Much like the rare discovery of a golden egg in a hen house, the strength and significance of this correlation are as remarkable as they are unexpected.
Thus, the findings of our study not only support but also enrich the existing literature on the intersection of eggspenditures and stock market dynamics. This eggceptional correlation serves as a firm foundation for eggspanding research efforts in the eggciting realm of eggonomics and investment analysis, presenting eggstraordinary opportunities for further studies to hatch. In essence, this research lays bare the eggceptional influence of eggconomy on investment, offering a sunny-side up perspective on the interconnectedness of egg-related indicators and financial markets. It's clear that this discovery is no yolk – it's an eggstraordinary breakthrough in the world of financial analysis and investment.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.
Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Annual US household spending on eggs and The Goldman Sachs Group's stock price (GS). You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.
Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.
Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
The Sunny-Side Up Connection: Clucking Good News for Eggspanding Portfolios
[[ABSTRACT]]
Eggs-amine the eggs-traordinary connection between annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group (GS). Through an eggshaustive analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) data spanning from 2002 to 2022, this study cracks open the sunny-side up truth behind this eggstremely clucktivating relationship. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8471076 and p < 0.01, lending huevos to the hypothesis that eggspenditures and GS stock price move in tandem. In shell, this research lays bare the eggceptional influence of eggconomy on investment, making it an eggsquisite area for further study. This eggceptional discovery is no yolk!
[[INTRDUCTION]]
The perplexing relationship between seemingly disparate metrics has long been a topic of interest in the world of finance. One such intriguing connection lies within the annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group (GS). It may seem rather egg-centric, but our shell-shocking discovery unveils an ova-rching theme that transcends the boundaries of traditional investment analysis.
As we delve into this oeufbeat subject, it is crucial to consider the practical implications of our findings. After all, there's no use in crying over spilled milk when you've got a dozen eggs in the fridge! Our research aims to crack the shell of mystery surrounding this peculiar relationship and separate the eggstraordinary from the sunny-side-up claims.
In the world of finance, one expects to find correlations between supply and demand, market performance, and economic indicators. But who would have thought that the humble egg, a symbol of both delicious breakfasts and delicate balance, could be tied to the movements of a major financial institution's stock? It's no yolk - the connection between eggs and stock prices is egg-ceptionally egg-squisite!
Stay tuned for the egg-straordinary journey ahead as we embark on a voyage of discovery into the fascinating world of eggonomics and stock market dynamics. On this eggventure, we'll uncover the sunny-side up connection that promises to scramble conventional wisdom and poach the interests of investors and eggthusiasts alike. And remember, don't put all your eggs in one basket – unless it's a basket of diversified investment options!
[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) revealed a striking correlation between annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group (GS) for the period 2002 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.8471076 indicates a strong positive relationship between the two variables. This suggests that as household spending on eggs increased, the stock price of GS also exhibited a tendency to rise. It's no yolk – these findings crack open a whole new avenue of investigation in the world of financial analysis.
The r-squared value of 0.7175912 demonstrates that 71.76% of the variability in GS stock price can be explained by the annual household spending on eggs. This robust value provides ample evidence to support the eggstraordinary influence of eggspenditures on the stock market dynamics of The Goldman Sachs Group. One might say that the relationship is as solid as a hard-boiled egg – undeniable and unshakeable.
Furthermore, the p-value being less than 0.01 indicates that the observed correlation is statistically significant at the 99% confidence level. This means that the likelihood of obtaining such a strong correlation by random chance is extremely low. In other words, it's as unlikely as finding a golden egg in a hen house – a rare and valuable discovery indeed.
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive correlation between annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of GS. The data points form a positively sloped pattern, emphasizing the consistent relationship between the two variables. One might say that this relationship is as clear as an eggshell – transparent and unambiguous.
In conclusion, these findings lay bare the eggceptional influence of eggconomy on the stock market dynamics of The Goldman Sachs Group. This discovery provides a sunny-side up perspective on the impact of household spending on a major financial institution's stock price, offering eggstraordinary insights for investors and researchers alike. This research sets the stage for further exploration into the eggciting world of eggonomics and its implications for investment strategies. This discovery is certainly no yolk – it's an eggciting breakthrough in the world of financial analysis and investment.
-------
Your response should start like this:
[[CONCLUSION]]
ChatGPT:
[[CONCLUSION]]
In shell, our eggshaustive analysis has cracked open a clucktivating correlation between annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group (GS). The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8471076 and p < 0.01 indicates an eggstraordinary link between these seemingly unrelated variables. It turns out, the old adage holds true – you can't make an omelette without breaking a few stocks!
The r-squared value of 0.7175912 provides ample evidence that the variability in GS stock price is as eggsplicable as a fowl pun – our eggspertly laid out findings leave no room for egg-centric interpretations. The significance of our results is as clear as day, or should we say as clear as a sunny-side-up egg?
Our research has poached the interests of investors and eggthusiasts alike and scrambled conventional wisdom in the world of financial analysis. The implications of this discovery are eggstraordinary, offering a tantalizing opportunity for further fry-ve-star exploration into the eggciting world of eggonomics. As they say, you can't make an omelette without breaking a few yolks – or, in this case, breaking ground in financial research.
In light of these eggstraordinary findings, it is safe to conclude that no more research is needed in this area. This discovery is no yolk – it's an eggciting breakthrough in the world of financial analysis and investment.
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited The Sunny-Side Up Connection: Clucking Good News for Eggspanding Portfolios. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.
ChatGPT:
The Poultry Finance Quarterly
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited The Sunny-Side Up Connection: Clucking Good News for Eggspanding Portfolios. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.
ChatGPT:
The International Institute for Eggscellent Economics and Poultry Research
Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled The Sunny-Side Up Connection: Clucking Good News for Eggspanding Portfolios with an abstract of Eggs-amine the eggs-traordinary connection between annual US household spending on eggs and the stock price of The Goldman Sachs Group (GS). Through an eggshaustive analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) data spanning from 2002 to 2022, this study cracks open the sunny-side up truth behind this eggstremely clucktivating relationship. Our findings reveal a robust correlation coefficient of 0.8471076 and p < 0.01, lending huevos to the hypothesis that eggspenditures and GS stock price move in tandem. In shell, this research lays bare the eggceptional influence of eggconomy on investment, making it an eggsquisite area for further study. This eggceptional discovery is no yolk!
ChatGPT:
US household egg spending, egg economy, egg spending, Goldman Sachs stock price, Bureau of Labor Statistics, LSEG Analytics, egg economy influence on investment
*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.
Discover a new correlation
View all correlations
View all research papers
Report an error
Data details
Annual US household spending on eggsDetailed data title: Average annual household spend on eggs
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
See what else correlates with Annual US household spending on eggs
The Goldman Sachs Group's stock price (GS)
Detailed data title: Opening price of The Goldman Sachs Group (GS) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function
See what else correlates with The Goldman Sachs Group's stock price (GS)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.
r2 = 0.7175912 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 71.8% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The Goldman Sachs Group's stock price (GS)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Annual US household spending on eggs) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.
p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.3E-6. 0.0000012718469590112177000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.
But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.
Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 0.00013% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 786,258 random variables You don't actually need 786 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.
p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.
In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.
Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.
[ 0.65, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.
This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!
All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.
Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | |
Annual US household spending on eggs (Household spend) | 34 | 37 | 42 | 33 | 37 | 43 | 51 | 44 | 46 | 50 | 53 | 56 | 58 | 63 | 56 | 55 | 64 | 58 | 64 | 68 | 87 |
The Goldman Sachs Group's stock price (GS) (Stock price) | 92.8 | 68.1 | 98.8 | 104.9 | 126.7 | 200.6 | 214.8 | 84.02 | 170.05 | 170.55 | 92.97 | 131.3 | 176.95 | 195.3 | 175.79 | 242.7 | 257.77 | 164.33 | 231 | 267 | 389 |
Why this works
- Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
- Lack of causal connection: There is probably
Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied. - Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple
Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
Try it yourself
You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.
Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"
Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.
Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.
Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.
Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"
If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:
"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."
# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats
# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):
# Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)
# Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
r_squared = correlation**2
return correlation, r_squared, p_value
# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([34,37,42,33,37,43,51,44,46,50,53,56,58,63,56,55,64,58,64,68,87,])
array_2 = np.array([92.8,68.1,98.8,104.9,126.7,200.6,214.8,84.02,170.05,170.55,92.97,131.3,176.95,195.3,175.79,242.7,257.77,164.33,231,267,389,])
array_1_name = "Annual US household spending on eggs"
array_2_name = "The Goldman Sachs Group's stock price (GS)"
# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)
# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)
Reuseable content
You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.
For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."
When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.
Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.
Download images for these variables:
- High resolution line chart
The image linked here is a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG). It is the highest resolution that is possible to achieve. It scales up beyond the size of the observable universe without pixelating. You do not need to email me asking if I have a higher resolution image. I do not. The physical limitations of our universe prevent me from providing you with an image that is any higher resolution than this one.
If you insert it into a PowerPoint presentation (a tool well-known for managing things that are the scale of the universe), you can right-click > "Ungroup" or "Create Shape" and then edit the lines and text directly. You can also change the colors this way.
Alternatively you can use a tool like Inkscape. - High resolution line chart, optimized for mobile
- Alternative high resolution line chart
- Scatterplot
- Portable line chart (png)
- Portable line chart (png), optimized for mobile
- Line chart for only Annual US household spending on eggs
- Line chart for only The Goldman Sachs Group's stock price (GS)
- AI-generated correlation image
- The spurious research paper: The Sunny-Side Up Connection: Clucking Good News for Eggspanding Portfolios
You're the rating guru we've been waiting for!
Correlation ID: 2682 · Black Variable ID: 19893 · Red Variable ID: 1621