about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,678 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Popularity of the first name Fallon and the second variable is ICICI Bank's stock price (IBN).  The chart goes from 2002 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

The name "Fallon" sounds like "fortune" which subconsciously made people think about money, leading to an increased interest in banking and investments, including ICICI Bank. This heightened demand for the stock drove up its price. It's like the name itself was casting a financial spell!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Based on your prompt, here's an enhanced image generation prompt for DALL·E-3: Generate a photo-realistic image set in a bustling city. In the center, a group of children is gathered around a large chalkboard with the name "Fallon" written in colorful letters. The children are engrossed in the lesson written on the board, while their parents stand behind them, smiling and proudly watching. In the background, a stock market ticker prominently displays the IBN stock price showing a steady upward trend. As the scene transitions through time, the children, now grown, are seen walking into an ICICI Bank branch with smiles on their faces, ready to open savings accounts. The bank's banner proudly announces a surge in new customers, symbolizing the increase in IBN stock price. Ensure that the visual depiction remains simple and does not include any words or speech bubbles. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Popularity of the first name Fallon and ICICI Bank's stock price (IBN). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A photo-realistic image a Polaroid photo Futuristic A scene from Skyrim An image that looks like it is a scene from A Disney Movie
ChatGPT: A photo-realistic image

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Popularity of the first name Fallon and ICICI Bank's stock price (IBN), in the following situation: Because as the popularity of the first name Fallon increased, more parents were inspired to name their children after the beloved late-night talk show host, Jimmy Fallon. This led to a surge in babies with the name Fallon, who grew up to open savings accounts at ICICI Bank as adults. The increase in new customers caused a boost in the bank's revenue, which in turn led to an increase in the stock price of IBN.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling city, a group of children gathers around a chalkboard with the name "Fallon" written in colorful letters, as their parents smile and proudly watch. In the distance, a stock market ticker displaying the IBN stock price shows a steady upward trend. The children, now grown, are seen walking into an ICICI Bank branch with smiles on their faces, ready to open savings accounts. The bank's banner proudly announces a surge in new customers, symbolizing the increase in IBN stock price.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A photo-realistic image ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling city, a group of children gathers around a chalkboard with the name "Fallon" written in colorful letters, as their parents smile and proudly watch. In the distance, a stock market ticker displaying the IBN stock price shows a steady upward trend. The children, now grown, are seen walking into an ICICI Bank branch with smiles on their faces, ready to open savings accounts. The bank's banner proudly announces a surge in new customers, symbolizing the increase in IBN stock price. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Based on your prompt, here's an enhanced image generation prompt for DALL·E-3: Generate a photo-realistic image set in a bustling city. In the center, a group of children is gathered around a large chalkboard with the name "Fallon" written in colorful letters. The children are engrossed in the lesson written on the board, while their parents stand behind them, smiling and proudly watching. In the background, a stock market ticker prominently displays the IBN stock price showing a steady upward trend. As the scene transitions through time, the children, now grown, are seen walking into an ICICI Bank branch with smiles on their faces, ready to open savings accounts. The bank's banner proudly announces a surge in new customers, symbolizing the increase in IBN stock price. Ensure that the visual depiction remains simple and does not include any words or speech bubbles.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Popularity of the first name Fallon caused ICICI Bank's stock price (IBN) to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Name Fallon's Impact on Bank Balance: A Quirky Connection between Personal Popularity and Stock Performance

The Journal of Mirthful Economics and Peculiar Correlations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Fallon and ICICI Bank's stock price (IBN). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title seem clever.

Your research team used data from US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8890574 and p < 0.01 for 2002 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Name Fallon's Impact on Bank Balance: A Quirky Connection between Personal Popularity and Stock Performance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the amusing intersection of personal nomenclature and financial markets. Specifically, we examine the unexpected correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Fallon" and the fluctuation of ICICI Bank's stock price (trading under the symbol IBN). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from the period of 2002 to 2022, our team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8890574 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This finding not only raises eyebrows but also prompts reflection on the whimsical influences that may impact market dynamics. Join us in uncovering the curious connection between personal popularity and stock performance, where the name "Fallon" evidently pulls the strings of financial fate.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Fallon and ICICI Bank's stock price (IBN). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Name Fallon's Impact on Bank Balance: A Quirky Connection between Personal Popularity and Stock Performance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the amusing intersection of personal nomenclature and financial markets. Specifically, we examine the unexpected correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Fallon" and the fluctuation of ICICI Bank's stock price (trading under the symbol IBN). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from the period of 2002 to 2022, our team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8890574 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This finding not only raises eyebrows but also prompts reflection on the whimsical influences that may impact market dynamics. Join us in uncovering the curious connection between personal popularity and stock performance, where the name "Fallon" evidently pulls the strings of financial fate.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
Ah, the whimsical world of empirical research, where the only thing more unpredictable than statistical outliers are the puns scattered within dry academic papers. In this paper, we embark on a quest to unravel the unlikeliest of connections – the impact of first name popularity on a bank's stock performance. Yes, you read that right. It's an exploration of how personal nomenclature might just hold sway over the fates of financial markets, in what we call "Name Fallon's Impact on Bank Balance: A Quirky Connection between Personal Popularity and Stock Performance."

As we dive into this curious amalgamation of quirky correlations and market mayhem, it's worth noting that we had our fair share of skepticism. After all, connecting the dots between the prevalence of the name "Fallon" and the stock price of ICICI Bank (IBN) sounds like the setup to a science fiction comedy flick. However, armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8890574. If that number doesn't make you raise an eyebrow, you probably haven't had enough caffeine yet.

Now, before you dismiss our findings as a statistical fluke, let's just say that the p-value is less than 0.01, leaving us with significant evidence in favor of this peculiar relationship. It turns out that the financial world may dance to the beat of whimsical variables beyond mere economic indicators, leading us to ponder the idea that perhaps the stock market is less about supply and demand, and more about the cosmic dance of first names.

So, grab your lab coat and a cup of coffee, because the data-driven rollercoaster that follows will take you on a journey through the uncharted territories of market research. Get ready to explore the unseen influences and unexpected connections that make the field of economics an enthralling blend of statistics, speculation, and sometimes, sheer serendipity. Welcome to the wacky world of economic quirkiness – where the name "Fallon" evidently pulls the strings of financial fate.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Fallon and ICICI Bank's stock price (IBN). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then cite some social media posts you read that seem to be related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Name Fallon's Impact on Bank Balance: A Quirky Connection between Personal Popularity and Stock Performance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the amusing intersection of personal nomenclature and financial markets. Specifically, we examine the unexpected correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Fallon" and the fluctuation of ICICI Bank's stock price (trading under the symbol IBN). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from the period of 2002 to 2022, our team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8890574 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This finding not only raises eyebrows but also prompts reflection on the whimsical influences that may impact market dynamics. Join us in uncovering the curious connection between personal popularity and stock performance, where the name "Fallon" evidently pulls the strings of financial fate.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the whimsical world of empirical research, where the only thing more unpredictable than statistical outliers are the puns scattered within dry academic papers. In this paper, we embark on a quest to unravel the unlikeliest of connections – the impact of first name popularity on a bank's stock performance. Yes, you read that right. It's an exploration of how personal nomenclature might just hold sway over the fates of financial markets, in what we call "Name Fallon's Impact on Bank Balance: A Quirky Connection between Personal Popularity and Stock Performance."
As we dive into this curious amalgamation of quirky correlations and market mayhem, it's worth noting that we had our fair share of skepticism. After all, connecting the dots between the prevalence of the name "Fallon" and the stock price of ICICI Bank (IBN) sounds like the setup to a science fiction comedy flick. However, armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8890574. If that number doesn't make you raise an eyebrow, you probably haven't had enough caffeine yet.
Now, before you dismiss our findings as a statistical fluke, let's just say that the p-value is less than 0.01, leaving us with significant evidence in favor of this peculiar relationship. It turns out that the financial world may dance to the beat of whimsical variables beyond mere economic indicators, leading us to ponder the idea that perhaps the stock market is less about supply and demand, and more about the cosmic dance of first names.
So, grab your lab coat and a cup of coffee, because the data-driven rollercoaster that follows will take you on a journey through the uncharted territories of market research. Get ready to explore the unseen influences and unexpected connections that make the field of economics an enthralling blend of statistics, speculation, and sometimes, sheer serendipity. Welcome to the wacky world of economic quirkiness – where the name "Fallon" evidently pulls the strings of financial fate.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Turning our attention to the existing literature on the relationship between nomenclature and financial markets, we find a well-established body of serious research examining the impact of various sociocultural factors on economic outcomes. Smith (2010) investigates the influence of personal names on consumer behavior, while Doe (2015) explores the psychological effects of name perception on stock investment. Jones (2018) delves into the societal implications of naming conventions on market trends. These studies provide a solid foundation for understanding the potential ramifications of personal nomenclature in the realm of finance.

However, as we venture further into the more whimsical side of this exploration, our search for related sources took a surprisingly comedic turn. Among the non-fiction books that seemingly border on the peculiar correlation we're investigating is "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner, which boldly delves into the unexpected connections that drive societal dynamics, albeit without explicitly mentioning the influence of individual names on stock prices. Another head-scratcher, "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell, emphasizes the role of rapid cognition in decision-making processes, offering tangential insights into the subconscious impact of names on financial choices.

In a twist that will undoubtedly raise some eyebrows, our search also led us to the realm of fiction, with books like "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss and "The Catcher in the Rye" by J.D. Salinger. While these literary works may not directly tackle economic peculiarities, their exploration of the significance of names and identities in shaping individual destinies provides a whimsical parallel to our investigation.

To add a dash of modernity to our review, we stumbled upon some intriguing social media musings on the topic. A particularly spirited Reddit post by u/EconEnigma235 playfully speculated about the obscure connection between celebrity name trends and cryptocurrency fluctuations, inadvertently touching on the offbeat nature of unexpected connections in the financial realm. Likewise, a Twitter thread by @MarketMischief delved into the whimsical correlations between pop culture phenomena and stock market anomalies, shedding light on the delightful enigma of unorthodox market influences.

As we meander through this literature review, it becomes evident that the intersection of personal nomenclature and financial markets is a whimsical rabbit hole with layers of potential correlations waiting to be uncovered. The scholarly and not-so-scholarly sources we've encountered offer a blend of serious inquiry and lighthearted speculation, mirroring the lighthearted yet thought-provoking nature of our investigation. In the delightful dance between academic gravity and unapologetic quirkiness, we find ourselves compelled to embrace the unexpected and examine the serious business of playful correlations.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Fallon and ICICI Bank's stock price (IBN). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2002 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Name Fallon's Impact on Bank Balance: A Quirky Connection between Personal Popularity and Stock Performance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the amusing intersection of personal nomenclature and financial markets. Specifically, we examine the unexpected correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Fallon" and the fluctuation of ICICI Bank's stock price (trading under the symbol IBN). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from the period of 2002 to 2022, our team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8890574 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This finding not only raises eyebrows but also prompts reflection on the whimsical influences that may impact market dynamics. Join us in uncovering the curious connection between personal popularity and stock performance, where the name "Fallon" evidently pulls the strings of financial fate.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Ah, the whimsical world of empirical research, where the only thing more unpredictable than statistical outliers are the puns scattered within dry academic papers. In this paper, we embark on a quest to unravel the unlikeliest of connections – the impact of first name popularity on a bank's stock performance. Yes, you read that right. It's an exploration of how personal nomenclature might just hold sway over the fates of financial markets, in what we call "Name Fallon's Impact on Bank Balance: A Quirky Connection between Personal Popularity and Stock Performance."
As we dive into this curious amalgamation of quirky correlations and market mayhem, it's worth noting that we had our fair share of skepticism. After all, connecting the dots between the prevalence of the name "Fallon" and the stock price of ICICI Bank (IBN) sounds like the setup to a science fiction comedy flick. However, armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8890574. If that number doesn't make you raise an eyebrow, you probably haven't had enough caffeine yet.
Now, before you dismiss our findings as a statistical fluke, let's just say that the p-value is less than 0.01, leaving us with significant evidence in favor of this peculiar relationship. It turns out that the financial world may dance to the beat of whimsical variables beyond mere economic indicators, leading us to ponder the idea that perhaps the stock market is less about supply and demand, and more about the cosmic dance of first names.
So, grab your lab coat and a cup of coffee, because the data-driven rollercoaster that follows will take you on a journey through the uncharted territories of market research. Get ready to explore the unseen influences and unexpected connections that make the field of economics an enthralling blend of statistics, speculation, and sometimes, sheer serendipity. Welcome to the wacky world of economic quirkiness – where the name "Fallon" evidently pulls the strings of financial fate.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

As much as we'd love to regale you with tales of how we summoned a crystal ball or consulted a fortune teller to uncover the name "Fallon's" mystical influence on ICICI Bank's stock price, we must confess that our methodology is grounded in the humdrum world of data collection and statistical analysis.

To commence the escapade, our crack team of researchers scoured through the annals of the US Social Security Administration, mining data on the prevalence of the name "Fallon" in the great tapestry of American nomenclature. With python scripts whirring and systems tirelessly crunching, we distilled this vast sea of names into a concise dataset that captured the rise and fall of Fallon's favor over the years.

Not content with mere moniker musings, we then set our sights on the stock market – a realm where fortunes are made and lost, and where the ebb and flow can be as capricious as the whims of a toddler with a lemonade stand. Unearthing historical stock price data for ICICI Bank (IBN) from LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we meticulously charted the undulating waves of market performance, seeking any telltale signs of correlation with our chosen name.

Now, here's where it gets a bit Sherlock Holmes-ish. Armed with our datasets, we deployed the sacred art of statistical analysis – a concoction brewed with T-tests, correlation coefficients, and p-values. Like alchemists in the lab, we meticulously stirred the cauldron of numbers to distill the essence of our findings.

Speaking of findings, our chief discovery emerged in the form of a correlation coefficient of 0.8890574. It's the kind of number that makes even the most stoic of statisticians do a double-take. To add a dash of statistical validation, we conjured a p-value of less than 0.01, serving as the Ben & Jerry's cherry on top of our research sundae.

That, dear reader, is how we arrived at the dizzying nexus of name popularity and stock price dynamics, armed with nothing more than data, a fervent sense of curiosity, and an unabashed appreciation for the whimsy of economic research. Join us as we venture forth into the heart of this curious correlation, where numbers and names converge in the most unexpected of ways, shaping the landscape of economic analysis into a playground of peculiar possibilities.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Fallon and ICICI Bank's stock price (IBN). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2002 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.8890574, r-squared of 0.7904230, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Name Fallon's Impact on Bank Balance: A Quirky Connection between Personal Popularity and Stock Performance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the amusing intersection of personal nomenclature and financial markets. Specifically, we examine the unexpected correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Fallon" and the fluctuation of ICICI Bank's stock price (trading under the symbol IBN). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from the period of 2002 to 2022, our team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8890574 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This finding not only raises eyebrows but also prompts reflection on the whimsical influences that may impact market dynamics. Join us in uncovering the curious connection between personal popularity and stock performance, where the name "Fallon" evidently pulls the strings of financial fate.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Ah, the whimsical world of empirical research, where the only thing more unpredictable than statistical outliers are the puns scattered within dry academic papers. In this paper, we embark on a quest to unravel the unlikeliest of connections – the impact of first name popularity on a bank's stock performance. Yes, you read that right. It's an exploration of how personal nomenclature might just hold sway over the fates of financial markets, in what we call "Name Fallon's Impact on Bank Balance: A Quirky Connection between Personal Popularity and Stock Performance."
As we dive into this curious amalgamation of quirky correlations and market mayhem, it's worth noting that we had our fair share of skepticism. After all, connecting the dots between the prevalence of the name "Fallon" and the stock price of ICICI Bank (IBN) sounds like the setup to a science fiction comedy flick. However, armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8890574. If that number doesn't make you raise an eyebrow, you probably haven't had enough caffeine yet.
Now, before you dismiss our findings as a statistical fluke, let's just say that the p-value is less than 0.01, leaving us with significant evidence in favor of this peculiar relationship. It turns out that the financial world may dance to the beat of whimsical variables beyond mere economic indicators, leading us to ponder the idea that perhaps the stock market is less about supply and demand, and more about the cosmic dance of first names.
So, grab your lab coat and a cup of coffee, because the data-driven rollercoaster that follows will take you on a journey through the uncharted territories of market research. Get ready to explore the unseen influences and unexpected connections that make the field of economics an enthralling blend of statistics, speculation, and sometimes, sheer serendipity. Welcome to the wacky world of economic quirkiness – where the name "Fallon" evidently pulls the strings of financial fate.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

**RESULTS**

In the realm of quirkiness and unexpected correlations, our research team unearthed a statistically significant relationship between the popularity of the first name "Fallon" and the stock performance of ICICI Bank (IBN) from 2002 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.8890574 that we stumbled upon could pique the interest of even the most stoic of analysts – it's as if the financial fates were being playfully nudged by a mischievous force, or perhaps a legion of "Fallon"s with stock market savvy.

This strong positive correlation essentially suggests that as the prevalence of the name "Fallon" waxes and wanes, the stock price of ICICI Bank has followed suit in lockstep, much like an enthusiastic partner in a lively square dance. The r-squared value of 0.7904230 further solidifies the substantial influence that the name "Fallon" wields over the stock price. It's as if the chaos of the stock market faithful has found a unique choreography with the predictability of first names – a paradoxical tango of unpredictability and statistical significance.

Now, pardon the lack of modesty, but we simply can't resist pointing out that the p-value falling below 0.01 is the icing on the cake. It's as if the universe itself, in all its probabilistic glory, has decided to play a whimsical game of chance wherein the name "Fallon" is the wildcard that everyone secretly roots for.

As a visual testament to this captivating correlation, Fig. 1 showcases a scatterplot that would make even the most pragmatic of statisticians raise an eyebrow – the data points form a nearly perfect straight line, as if to playfully taunt the notion of random chance.

In conclusion, our study not only affirms the existence of an uncanny link between the name "Fallon" and the stock performance of ICICI Bank but also serves as a whimsical reminder that perhaps, just perhaps, there are unseen forces at play in the seemingly rational world of finance. We invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts to join us in this captivating venture of statistical serendipity and to ponder the enigmatic dance of first names and financial figures. For in the quirky constellation of data points and personal appellations, lies a rich tapestry of intrigue and the undeniable allure of scientific whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Fallon and ICICI Bank's stock price (IBN). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Name Fallon's Impact on Bank Balance: A Quirky Connection between Personal Popularity and Stock Performance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the amusing intersection of personal nomenclature and financial markets. Specifically, we examine the unexpected correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Fallon" and the fluctuation of ICICI Bank's stock price (trading under the symbol IBN). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from the period of 2002 to 2022, our team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8890574 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This finding not only raises eyebrows but also prompts reflection on the whimsical influences that may impact market dynamics. Join us in uncovering the curious connection between personal popularity and stock performance, where the name "Fallon" evidently pulls the strings of financial fate.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Turning our attention to the existing literature on the relationship between nomenclature and financial markets, we find a well-established body of serious research examining the impact of various sociocultural factors on economic outcomes. Smith (2010) investigates the influence of personal names on consumer behavior, while Doe (2015) explores the psychological effects of name perception on stock investment. Jones (2018) delves into the societal implications of naming conventions on market trends. These studies provide a solid foundation for understanding the potential ramifications of personal nomenclature in the realm of finance.
However, as we venture further into the more whimsical side of this exploration, our search for related sources took a surprisingly comedic turn. Among the non-fiction books that seemingly border on the peculiar correlation we're investigating is "Freakonomics" by Levitt and Dubner, which boldly delves into the unexpected connections that drive societal dynamics, albeit without explicitly mentioning the influence of individual names on stock prices. Another head-scratcher, "Blink" by Malcolm Gladwell, emphasizes the role of rapid cognition in decision-making processes, offering tangential insights into the subconscious impact of names on financial choices.
In a twist that will undoubtedly raise some eyebrows, our search also led us to the realm of fiction, with books like "The Name of the Wind" by Patrick Rothfuss and "The Catcher in the Rye" by J.D. Salinger. While these literary works may not directly tackle economic peculiarities, their exploration of the significance of names and identities in shaping individual destinies provides a whimsical parallel to our investigation.
To add a dash of modernity to our review, we stumbled upon some intriguing social media musings on the topic. A particularly spirited Reddit post by u/EconEnigma235 playfully speculated about the obscure connection between celebrity name trends and cryptocurrency fluctuations, inadvertently touching on the offbeat nature of unexpected connections in the financial realm. Likewise, a Twitter thread by @MarketMischief delved into the whimsical correlations between pop culture phenomena and stock market anomalies, shedding light on the delightful enigma of unorthodox market influences.
As we meander through this literature review, it becomes evident that the intersection of personal nomenclature and financial markets is a whimsical rabbit hole with layers of potential correlations waiting to be uncovered. The scholarly and not-so-scholarly sources we've encountered offer a blend of serious inquiry and lighthearted speculation, mirroring the lighthearted yet thought-provoking nature of our investigation. In the delightful dance between academic gravity and unapologetic quirkiness, we find ourselves compelled to embrace the unexpected and examine the serious business of playful correlations.

[[RESULTS]]
In the realm of quirkiness and unexpected correlations, our research team unearthed a statistically significant relationship between the popularity of the first name "Fallon" and the stock performance of ICICI Bank (IBN) from 2002 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.8890574 that we stumbled upon could pique the interest of even the most stoic of analysts – it's as if the financial fates were being playfully nudged by a mischievous force, or perhaps a legion of "Fallon"s with stock market savvy.
This strong positive correlation essentially suggests that as the prevalence of the name "Fallon" waxes and wanes, the stock price of ICICI Bank has followed suit in lockstep, much like an enthusiastic partner in a lively square dance. The r-squared value of 0.7904230 further solidifies the substantial influence that the name "Fallon" wields over the stock price. It's as if the chaos of the stock market faithful has found a unique choreography with the predictability of first names – a paradoxical tango of unpredictability and statistical significance.
Now, pardon the lack of modesty, but we simply can't resist pointing out that the p-value falling below 0.01 is the icing on the cake. It's as if the universe itself, in all its probabilistic glory, has decided to play a whimsical game of chance wherein the name "Fallon" is the wildcard that everyone secretly roots for.
As a visual testament to this captivating correlation, Fig. 1 showcases a scatterplot that would make even the most pragmatic of statisticians raise an eyebrow – the data points form a nearly perfect straight line, as if to playfully taunt the notion of random chance.
In conclusion, our study not only affirms the existence of an uncanny link between the name "Fallon" and the stock performance of ICICI Bank but also serves as a whimsical reminder that perhaps, just perhaps, there are unseen forces at play in the seemingly rational world of finance. We invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts to join us in this captivating venture of statistical serendipity and to ponder the enigmatic dance of first names and financial figures. For in the quirky constellation of data points and personal appellations, lies a rich tapestry of intrigue and the undeniable allure of scientific whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The culmination of our research has led to an amusing juncture where the unlikeliest of variables, the name "Fallon," has pirouetted into the world of finance and been found to have a statistically discernible impact on the stock performance of ICICI Bank (IBN). Our findings not only corroborate the scholarly investigations of Smith, Doe, and Jones but also add a whimsical twist to the conversation, echoing the lighthearted musings of u/EconEnigma235 and @MarketMischief.

One cannot help but marvel at the unexpected correlations we have stumbled upon, akin to a grand farce orchestrated by statistics itself. The self-assured correlation coefficient of 0.8890574 serves as an incontestable testament to the unseen influence that the moniker "Fallon" wields over the stock price of ICICI Bank, broadening the horizon of what can only be described as a whimsical manifestation of the unpredictable rationality of financial markets.

With an r-squared value of 0.7904230, the predictability of the name "Fallon" in sync with the stock price paints a picture akin to an intricate ballet between the namesake and the stock market. It's as if amidst the chaotic unpredictability of stock performance, the tranquil melody of the name "Fallon" has found a discernible rhythm, lending an air of serendipity to the otherwise somber business of financial analyses.

The whisper of statistical significance is further accentuated by a p-value of less than 0.01, as if the gods of probability have orchestrated a light-hearted masquerade, with the name "Fallon" at the center of the revelry. Indeed, our findings unveil a tapestry of whimsical, yet conclusive correlations that challenge the conventional rigidity of financial data – it seems that sometimes, we can't help but find a sense of humor in the most unlikely places.

As we contemplate the scatterplot showcased in Fig. 1, one can't help but recognize the inherent playfulness within the sea of data points that have aligned themselves in near-perfect symmetry, almost as if the statistical gods themselves are winking at us. It's a visual masterpiece that embodies the quirkiness of our findings, enticing even the most stoic of observers to join in the dance of whimsical correlations.

In effect, our study not only sheds light on the playful interplay between personal appellations and financial figures but also beckons the quixotic curiosity of researchers and enthusiasts to explore the enigmatic forces that seemingly lurk within the rational world of finance. As we venture deeper into this labyrinth of statistical serendipity, let us not forget that even in the most serious of scientific pursuits, there may be room for the delightful absurdity of statistical whimsy.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Popularity of the first name Fallon and ICICI Bank's stock price (IBN). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Name Fallon's Impact on Bank Balance: A Quirky Connection between Personal Popularity and Stock Performance"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this paper, we delve into the amusing intersection of personal nomenclature and financial markets. Specifically, we examine the unexpected correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Fallon" and the fluctuation of ICICI Bank's stock price (trading under the symbol IBN). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from the period of 2002 to 2022, our team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8890574 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This finding not only raises eyebrows but also prompts reflection on the whimsical influences that may impact market dynamics. Join us in uncovering the curious connection between personal popularity and stock performance, where the name "Fallon" evidently pulls the strings of financial fate.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Ah, the whimsical world of empirical research, where the only thing more unpredictable than statistical outliers are the puns scattered within dry academic papers. In this paper, we embark on a quest to unravel the unlikeliest of connections – the impact of first name popularity on a bank's stock performance. Yes, you read that right. It's an exploration of how personal nomenclature might just hold sway over the fates of financial markets, in what we call "Name Fallon's Impact on Bank Balance: A Quirky Connection between Personal Popularity and Stock Performance."
As we dive into this curious amalgamation of quirky correlations and market mayhem, it's worth noting that we had our fair share of skepticism. After all, connecting the dots between the prevalence of the name "Fallon" and the stock price of ICICI Bank (IBN) sounds like the setup to a science fiction comedy flick. However, armed with data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv), we uncovered a correlation coefficient of 0.8890574. If that number doesn't make you raise an eyebrow, you probably haven't had enough caffeine yet.
Now, before you dismiss our findings as a statistical fluke, let's just say that the p-value is less than 0.01, leaving us with significant evidence in favor of this peculiar relationship. It turns out that the financial world may dance to the beat of whimsical variables beyond mere economic indicators, leading us to ponder the idea that perhaps the stock market is less about supply and demand, and more about the cosmic dance of first names.
So, grab your lab coat and a cup of coffee, because the data-driven rollercoaster that follows will take you on a journey through the uncharted territories of market research. Get ready to explore the unseen influences and unexpected connections that make the field of economics an enthralling blend of statistics, speculation, and sometimes, sheer serendipity. Welcome to the wacky world of economic quirkiness – where the name "Fallon" evidently pulls the strings of financial fate.

[[RESULTS]]
In the realm of quirkiness and unexpected correlations, our research team unearthed a statistically significant relationship between the popularity of the first name "Fallon" and the stock performance of ICICI Bank (IBN) from 2002 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.8890574 that we stumbled upon could pique the interest of even the most stoic of analysts – it's as if the financial fates were being playfully nudged by a mischievous force, or perhaps a legion of "Fallon"s with stock market savvy.
This strong positive correlation essentially suggests that as the prevalence of the name "Fallon" waxes and wanes, the stock price of ICICI Bank has followed suit in lockstep, much like an enthusiastic partner in a lively square dance. The r-squared value of 0.7904230 further solidifies the substantial influence that the name "Fallon" wields over the stock price. It's as if the chaos of the stock market faithful has found a unique choreography with the predictability of first names – a paradoxical tango of unpredictability and statistical significance.
Now, pardon the lack of modesty, but we simply can't resist pointing out that the p-value falling below 0.01 is the icing on the cake. It's as if the universe itself, in all its probabilistic glory, has decided to play a whimsical game of chance wherein the name "Fallon" is the wildcard that everyone secretly roots for.
As a visual testament to this captivating correlation, Fig. 1 showcases a scatterplot that would make even the most pragmatic of statisticians raise an eyebrow – the data points form a nearly perfect straight line, as if to playfully taunt the notion of random chance.
In conclusion, our study not only affirms the existence of an uncanny link between the name "Fallon" and the stock performance of ICICI Bank but also serves as a whimsical reminder that perhaps, just perhaps, there are unseen forces at play in the seemingly rational world of finance. We invite fellow researchers and enthusiasts to join us in this captivating venture of statistical serendipity and to ponder the enigmatic dance of first names and financial figures. For in the quirky constellation of data points and personal appellations, lies a rich tapestry of intrigue and the undeniable allure of scientific whimsy.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In the captivating tale of the name "Fallon" and ICICI Bank's stock performance, our findings not only add a sprinkle of whimsy to the typically serious world of finance but also remind us of the serendipitous dance of statistics and personal monikers. It's as if the cosmic stage is set for a quirky performance where financial fate waltzes with the popularity of names, leaving us to wonder whether there's more to stock market fluctuations than meets the eye - or should we say, the NYSE?

As we bid adieu to this strange but strangely intriguing correlation, let's acknowledge that the statistically significant connection between "Fallon" and IBN suggests a harmony that defies rational explanation. It's akin to witnessing a choreographed dance between unpredictability and predictability, where statistics and personal names tango in a manner that would make even the most ardent skeptics raise an eyebrow - or perhaps furrow it in bemusement.

In the spirit of scientific whimsy, our study entreats future researchers and aficionados to revel in this delightful dance of data points and personal appellations. For in the field of economics, as in life, sometimes the most unexpected correlations lead to the most intriguing insights. Yet, as we pirouette out of this comical intersection of personal nomenclature and financial markets, it's with a playful caution that we assert: no further research is needed in this delightfully wacky area of study. It's time for "Fallon's" influence on IBN's stock price to take a well-deserved curtain call, leaving us with a wink and a smile at the whimsical phenomena that statistical analysis may unexpectedly reveal.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Name Fallon's Impact on Bank Balance: A Quirky Connection between Personal Popularity and Stock Performance. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Mirthful Economics and Peculiar Correlations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Name Fallon's Impact on Bank Balance: A Quirky Connection between Personal Popularity and Stock Performance. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Quirky Economics Research


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Name Fallon's Impact on Bank Balance: A Quirky Connection between Personal Popularity and Stock Performance with an abstract of In this paper, we delve into the amusing intersection of personal nomenclature and financial markets. Specifically, we examine the unexpected correlation between the prevalence of the first name "Fallon" and the fluctuation of ICICI Bank's stock price (trading under the symbol IBN). Leveraging data from the US Social Security Administration and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) from the period of 2002 to 2022, our team discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8890574 and a p-value of less than 0.01. This finding not only raises eyebrows but also prompts reflection on the whimsical influences that may impact market dynamics. Join us in uncovering the curious connection between personal popularity and stock performance, where the name "Fallon" evidently pulls the strings of financial fate.

ChatGPT:

Fallon, Bank Balance, Personal Popularity, Stock Performance, Name Correlation, ICICI Bank, IBN, Stock Price Fluctuation, US Social Security Administration, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, Correlation Coefficient, P-Value, Market Dynamics, Financial Fate

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Popularity of the first name Fallon
Detailed data title: Babies of all sexes born in the US named Fallon
Source: US Social Security Administration
See what else correlates with Popularity of the first name Fallon

ICICI Bank's stock price (IBN)
Detailed data title: Opening price of ICICI Bank (IBN) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with ICICI Bank's stock price (IBN)

Correlation r = 0.8890574 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7904230 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 79% of the change in the one variable (i.e., ICICI Bank's stock price (IBN)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Popularity of the first name Fallon) over the 21 years from 2002 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.2E-8. 0.0000000716720943586481800000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.89 in 7.2E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 13,952,432 random variables You don't actually need 13 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 20 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 20 because we have two variables measured over a period of 21 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.74, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Popularity of the first name Fallon (Babies born)153172168163201234212209221233229263278263279241266304342422426
ICICI Bank's stock price (IBN) (Stock price)0.851.183.233.685.357.7311.563.536.919.274.958.176.610.786.936.819.7810.3115.1414.6920.34




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([153,172,168,163,201,234,212,209,221,233,229,263,278,263,279,241,266,304,342,422,426,])
array_2 = np.array([0.85,1.18,3.23,3.68,5.35,7.73,11.56,3.53,6.91,9.27,4.95,8.17,6.6,10.78,6.93,6.81,9.78,10.31,15.14,14.69,20.34,])
array_1_name = "Popularity of the first name Fallon"
array_2_name = "ICICI Bank's stock price (IBN)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 2678 · Black Variable ID: 3784 · Red Variable ID: 1655
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0