about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,652 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and the second variable is Netflix's stock price (NFLX).  The chart goes from 2012 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As more people became knowledgeable about military technologies, they were better able to appreciate the accuracy of the action scenes in military-themed shows and movies, leading to higher viewer satisfaction and increased demand for Netflix, ultimately driving up the stock price. Looks like military precision isn't just for the battlefield, but also for the bull market!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a bustling university hall filled with graduates in military technologies and applied sciences proudly holding up their Bachelor's degree certificates while wearing caps and gowns. In the background, there is a giant screen displaying Netflix's stock price chart, showing a steady upward trend. The graduates are engaged in lively conversations, brainstorming ways to enhance Netflix's cybersecurity and protect the popular streaming platform. The scene depicts expertise in military technologies contributing directly to the security and success of the entertainment industry, with a high-tech aesthetic. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and Netflix's stock price (NFLX). Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Concept art Cyber folk Macabre Symbolism High-tech
ChatGPT: High-tech

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and Netflix's stock price (NFLX), in the following situation: It's simple - as more people became experts in military technologies, they found ways to bolster Netflix's cybersecurity, making the platform more secure and attractive to investors. After all, who better to fend off online threats than the very people who know how to build high-tech weaponry? It's a case of protecting both screens - whether it's national security or binge-watching.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a bustling university hall, graduates in military technologies and applied sciences proudly hold up their Bachelor's degree certificates while wearing caps and gowns. In the background, a giant screen displays Netflix's stock price chart, showing a steady upward trend. The graduates are engaged in lively conversations, brainstorming ways to enhance Netflix's cybersecurity and protect the popular streaming platform. In this scene, expertise in military technologies is directly contributing to the security and success of the entertainment industry.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ High-tech ] and depicting this scene: In a bustling university hall, graduates in military technologies and applied sciences proudly hold up their Bachelor's degree certificates while wearing caps and gowns. In the background, a giant screen displays Netflix's stock price chart, showing a steady upward trend. The graduates are engaged in lively conversations, brainstorming ways to enhance Netflix's cybersecurity and protect the popular streaming platform. In this scene, expertise in military technologies is directly contributing to the security and success of the entertainment industry. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a bustling university hall filled with graduates in military technologies and applied sciences proudly holding up their Bachelor's degree certificates while wearing caps and gowns. In the background, there is a giant screen displaying Netflix's stock price chart, showing a steady upward trend. The graduates are engaged in lively conversations, brainstorming ways to enhance Netflix's cybersecurity and protect the popular streaming platform. The scene depicts expertise in military technologies contributing directly to the security and success of the entertainment industry, with a high-tech aesthetic.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences caused Netflix's stock price (NFLX) to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
March to the Bachelor's Degree Drum: How Military Tech and Netflix Stacks up in Stock

The Journal of Strategic Bachelor's Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and Netflix's stock price (NFLX). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9900313 and p < 0.01 for 2012 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"March to the Bachelor's Degree Drum: How Military Tech and Netflix Stacks up in Stock"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This hard-hitting research paper sets out to investigate the seemingly unconquerable relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the fluctuating stock price of the streaming giant, Netflix (NFLX). Using a data-driven approach, our team delved into the abyss of statistical analysis, utilizing both the comprehensive National Center for Education Statistics and the towering LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). As we marched through our research, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9900313 and a p-value that landed squarely under 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. In this pursuit, we faced the unyielding challenge of disentangling the complexities of military tech and Netflix's stock behavior, all while maintaining a disciplined, structured methodology. Our findings not only enrich the scholarly landscape, but also lend a comedic twist to the otherwise austere world of academic inquiry. So, don your academic armor and get ready to march alongside us as we unravel the interconnectedness of military technology education and streaming stock success.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and Netflix's stock price (NFLX). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"March to the Bachelor's Degree Drum: How Military Tech and Netflix Stacks up in Stock"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This hard-hitting research paper sets out to investigate the seemingly unconquerable relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the fluctuating stock price of the streaming giant, Netflix (NFLX). Using a data-driven approach, our team delved into the abyss of statistical analysis, utilizing both the comprehensive National Center for Education Statistics and the towering LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). As we marched through our research, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9900313 and a p-value that landed squarely under 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. In this pursuit, we faced the unyielding challenge of disentangling the complexities of military tech and Netflix's stock behavior, all while maintaining a disciplined, structured methodology. Our findings not only enrich the scholarly landscape, but also lend a comedic twist to the otherwise austere world of academic inquiry. So, don your academic armor and get ready to march alongside us as we unravel the interconnectedness of military technology education and streaming stock success.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Buckle up, fellow researchers, because we are about to embark on a wild ride through the realms of military technology education and the capricious world of stock markets. In this paper, we set out to explore the correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of everyone's favorite binge-watching companion, Netflix (NFLX). As we march into the trenches of data analysis, we will navigate through the treacherous terrain of statistical significance and attempt to decode the enigmatic relationship between the military and the silver screen.

It might seem like an odd couple - military tech and Netflix - marching arm in arm in the stock market parade. But hey, stranger things have happened, right? Our aim is not only to uncover the statistical dance between these two seemingly incongruent players but also to inject a little humor and levity into the otherwise overly serious world of academic research. After all, who said number-crunching and data wrangling can't be a bit of fun?

So, grab your calculators and popcorn, because it's time to unearth the interconnectedness of military technology education and streaming stock success. Let's dive in, all guns blazing (metaphorically, of course).


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and Netflix's stock price (NFLX). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a couple popular internet memes that are related to one of the topics.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"March to the Bachelor's Degree Drum: How Military Tech and Netflix Stacks up in Stock"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This hard-hitting research paper sets out to investigate the seemingly unconquerable relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the fluctuating stock price of the streaming giant, Netflix (NFLX). Using a data-driven approach, our team delved into the abyss of statistical analysis, utilizing both the comprehensive National Center for Education Statistics and the towering LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). As we marched through our research, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9900313 and a p-value that landed squarely under 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. In this pursuit, we faced the unyielding challenge of disentangling the complexities of military tech and Netflix's stock behavior, all while maintaining a disciplined, structured methodology. Our findings not only enrich the scholarly landscape, but also lend a comedic twist to the otherwise austere world of academic inquiry. So, don your academic armor and get ready to march alongside us as we unravel the interconnectedness of military technology education and streaming stock success.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Buckle up, fellow researchers, because we are about to embark on a wild ride through the realms of military technology education and the capricious world of stock markets. In this paper, we set out to explore the correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of everyone's favorite binge-watching companion, Netflix (NFLX). As we march into the trenches of data analysis, we will navigate through the treacherous terrain of statistical significance and attempt to decode the enigmatic relationship between the military and the silver screen.
It might seem like an odd couple - military tech and Netflix - marching arm in arm in the stock market parade. But hey, stranger things have happened, right? Our aim is not only to uncover the statistical dance between these two seemingly incongruent players but also to inject a little humor and levity into the otherwise overly serious world of academic research. After all, who said number-crunching and data wrangling can't be a bit of fun?
So, grab your calculators and popcorn, because it's time to unearth the interconnectedness of military technology education and streaming stock success. Let's dive in, all guns blazing (metaphorically, of course).

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The idea of bridging the gap between Bachelor's degrees in military technologies and Netflix's stock price might sound as peculiar as a penguin in a sauna, but lo and behold, the research on this unexpected duo is as abundant as the snacks during a Netflix binge-watching session.

Smith et al. (2015) delved into the world of military technology education with an emphasis on its evolving curriculum and its impact on the defense industry. They meticulously dissect the intricacies of weapon systems, cybersecurity, and aerospace engineering, shedding light on the advancements that prepare students for careers in the military and beyond.

On the Netflix front, Doe (2018) breaks down the streaming giant's stock performance over the years, scrutinizing the influence of original content, subscriber growth, and market competition. Their comprehensive analysis reveals the ebb and flow of NFLX stock like a tumultuous telenovela, highlighting the rollercoaster ride investors have endured.

As we tread further into the peculiar intersection of military technologies and Netflix, we encounter some unexpected companions on our scholarly journey. "War, Technology, and Experience aboard the USS Monitor" by Jones (2007) provides a historical account of naval technology, offering a glimpse into the evolution of military innovations.

On the entertainment side, "Streaming Literature: Exploring the World of Fiction through Online Platforms" by Smith (2019) explores the impact of streaming on literary adaptations and storytelling. While this might seem tangential to our research, diving into fiction can offer a refreshing break from the strenuous analysis of stock market data.

Speaking of fiction, let's not forget the classic "War and Peace" by Leo Tolstoy, a timeless tale of love and war. Though not directly related to military technologies or Netflix, the book's enduring popularity holds a mirror to society's fascination with conflicts and human drama, much like the captivating narratives we binge on streaming platforms.

In the world of internet memes, we can't overlook the iconic "Success Kid" meme, which embodies the triumphs and tribulations of stock market victories and defeats. And who can resist the infamous "Netflix and Chill" meme, a playful nod to the ubiquitous pastime of unwinding with streaming content, albeit at the expense of productivity.

As we blend the serious with the whimsical, it becomes evident that our research journey is akin to a military strategy meeting infused with the levity of a comedy show. With our analytical helmets firmly in place, we forge ahead, ready to uncover the unexpected connections between military technology education and the ascent and descent of Netflix's stock price.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and Netflix's stock price (NFLX). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) . You used data from 2012 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"March to the Bachelor's Degree Drum: How Military Tech and Netflix Stacks up in Stock"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This hard-hitting research paper sets out to investigate the seemingly unconquerable relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the fluctuating stock price of the streaming giant, Netflix (NFLX). Using a data-driven approach, our team delved into the abyss of statistical analysis, utilizing both the comprehensive National Center for Education Statistics and the towering LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). As we marched through our research, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9900313 and a p-value that landed squarely under 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. In this pursuit, we faced the unyielding challenge of disentangling the complexities of military tech and Netflix's stock behavior, all while maintaining a disciplined, structured methodology. Our findings not only enrich the scholarly landscape, but also lend a comedic twist to the otherwise austere world of academic inquiry. So, don your academic armor and get ready to march alongside us as we unravel the interconnectedness of military technology education and streaming stock success.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Buckle up, fellow researchers, because we are about to embark on a wild ride through the realms of military technology education and the capricious world of stock markets. In this paper, we set out to explore the correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of everyone's favorite binge-watching companion, Netflix (NFLX). As we march into the trenches of data analysis, we will navigate through the treacherous terrain of statistical significance and attempt to decode the enigmatic relationship between the military and the silver screen.
It might seem like an odd couple - military tech and Netflix - marching arm in arm in the stock market parade. But hey, stranger things have happened, right? Our aim is not only to uncover the statistical dance between these two seemingly incongruent players but also to inject a little humor and levity into the otherwise overly serious world of academic research. After all, who said number-crunching and data wrangling can't be a bit of fun?
So, grab your calculators and popcorn, because it's time to unearth the interconnectedness of military technology education and streaming stock success. Let's dive in, all guns blazing (metaphorically, of course).

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In this study, we employed a rigorous and multifaceted methodology to unearth the relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of Netflix (NFLX). Our approach encompassed a fusion of quantitative analysis, data wrangling, and a dash of whimsy to keep things lively.

To kick things off, we undertook a comprehensive data collection expedition, casting our nets far and wide across the internet. We sifted through the digital seas, hauling in boatloads of information, and emerged with a treasure trove of relevant data from 2012 to 2021. Our primary sources included the esteemed National Center for Education Statistics and the venerable LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). We chose these sources because, well, nobody does it like Refinitiv – they're practically the Shakespeare of financial data. Plus, we wanted to give a nod to the National Center for Education Statistics for holding down the fort in the realm of educational data.

Once we corralled our data, we steered our analytical ship toward the choppy waters of statistical analysis. Plunging into the tempest of quantitative methods, we calculated correlation coefficients and p-values with the determination of a sailor sighting the fabled shores of statistical significance. If you've ever gone fishing for correlations, you know how elusive those critters can be – but we had our trusty statistical nets at the ready.

Diving deeper into the methodology sea, we employed a novel approach involving what we affectionately dubbed the "Netflix Stock Price Funnel." This complex contraption involved a series of elaborate contraptions and mechanisms intended to symbolize the data funneling process, but truth be told, it mostly just made squiggly lines on the whiteboard. However, the theatrical nature of the process provided our team with much-needed levity during the arduous data analysis phase.

With our data in hand and our statistical compass firmly in place, we embarked on the Herculean task of disentangling the multitude of variables and market influences at play. Like intrepid explorers hacking through the jungle with machetes, we hacked our way through the dense underbrush of data, carving out a path of understanding amidst the chaos.

In addition, we cannot underestimate the importance of caffeinated beverages in fueling our research endeavors. The ubiquitous presence of coffee and energy drinks sustained our team through many a late-night data crunching session and heated discussions on which Netflix series to binge-watch for "research purposes."

Lastly, to ensure the integrity and robustness of our findings, we subjected our methodology to rigorous peer review and scrutiny, culminating in a highly caffeinated, yet invaluable, validation process.

So there you have it – our intrepid adventure into the methodology of unraveling the entwined fates of military technology education and the stock price of our beloved streaming giant. It was a journey fraught with peril, caffeine, and a healthy sprinkling of humor. But hey, that's just how we, the fearless researchers, roll.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and Netflix's stock price (NFLX). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from National Center for Education Statistics and LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv) .

For the time period 2012 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9900313, r-squared of 0.9801619, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"March to the Bachelor's Degree Drum: How Military Tech and Netflix Stacks up in Stock"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This hard-hitting research paper sets out to investigate the seemingly unconquerable relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the fluctuating stock price of the streaming giant, Netflix (NFLX). Using a data-driven approach, our team delved into the abyss of statistical analysis, utilizing both the comprehensive National Center for Education Statistics and the towering LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). As we marched through our research, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9900313 and a p-value that landed squarely under 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. In this pursuit, we faced the unyielding challenge of disentangling the complexities of military tech and Netflix's stock behavior, all while maintaining a disciplined, structured methodology. Our findings not only enrich the scholarly landscape, but also lend a comedic twist to the otherwise austere world of academic inquiry. So, don your academic armor and get ready to march alongside us as we unravel the interconnectedness of military technology education and streaming stock success.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Buckle up, fellow researchers, because we are about to embark on a wild ride through the realms of military technology education and the capricious world of stock markets. In this paper, we set out to explore the correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of everyone's favorite binge-watching companion, Netflix (NFLX). As we march into the trenches of data analysis, we will navigate through the treacherous terrain of statistical significance and attempt to decode the enigmatic relationship between the military and the silver screen.
It might seem like an odd couple - military tech and Netflix - marching arm in arm in the stock market parade. But hey, stranger things have happened, right? Our aim is not only to uncover the statistical dance between these two seemingly incongruent players but also to inject a little humor and levity into the otherwise overly serious world of academic research. After all, who said number-crunching and data wrangling can't be a bit of fun?
So, grab your calculators and popcorn, because it's time to unearth the interconnectedness of military technology education and streaming stock success. Let's dive in, all guns blazing (metaphorically, of course).

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our investigation into the relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of Netflix (NFLX) uncovered an astonishingly tight correlation. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9900313, indicating a nearly perfect positive linear relationship between these two seemingly disparate entities. This numerical bond is so strong, it's like they were meant to be together, like peanut butter and jelly, or like a good movie and a rainy day.

In addition, our analysis revealed an r-squared value of 0.9801619. This means that a whopping 98.02% of the variability in Netflix's stock price can be attributed to the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences. It's like these two variables are in a committed relationship, finishing each other's sentences and always knowing what the other is thinking. Talk about a power couple!

Furthermore, our p-value, coming in at a measly < 0.01, reaffirms the robustness of our findings. This indicates that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship by random chance is less than 1%, which sounds like a match made in statistical heaven if you ask us.

And if numbers aren't your thing, fear not, for we have a visually appealing treat in store. Fig. 1 showcases a scatterplot that visually captures the undeniable correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and Netflix's stock price. It's like a visual love story unfolding before your eyes, displaying a clear pattern of mutual influence.

To summarize, our results support the notion that there is a remarkably strong and statistically significant connection between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and Netflix's stock price. It's a partnership that defies conventional wisdom, but as our data unequivocally demonstrates, it's a match made in heaven (or perhaps in the cloud).


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and Netflix's stock price (NFLX). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"March to the Bachelor's Degree Drum: How Military Tech and Netflix Stacks up in Stock"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This hard-hitting research paper sets out to investigate the seemingly unconquerable relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the fluctuating stock price of the streaming giant, Netflix (NFLX). Using a data-driven approach, our team delved into the abyss of statistical analysis, utilizing both the comprehensive National Center for Education Statistics and the towering LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). As we marched through our research, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9900313 and a p-value that landed squarely under 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. In this pursuit, we faced the unyielding challenge of disentangling the complexities of military tech and Netflix's stock behavior, all while maintaining a disciplined, structured methodology. Our findings not only enrich the scholarly landscape, but also lend a comedic twist to the otherwise austere world of academic inquiry. So, don your academic armor and get ready to march alongside us as we unravel the interconnectedness of military technology education and streaming stock success.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The idea of bridging the gap between Bachelor's degrees in military technologies and Netflix's stock price might sound as peculiar as a penguin in a sauna, but lo and behold, the research on this unexpected duo is as abundant as the snacks during a Netflix binge-watching session.
Smith et al. (2015) delved into the world of military technology education with an emphasis on its evolving curriculum and its impact on the defense industry. They meticulously dissect the intricacies of weapon systems, cybersecurity, and aerospace engineering, shedding light on the advancements that prepare students for careers in the military and beyond.
On the Netflix front, Doe (2018) breaks down the streaming giant's stock performance over the years, scrutinizing the influence of original content, subscriber growth, and market competition. Their comprehensive analysis reveals the ebb and flow of NFLX stock like a tumultuous telenovela, highlighting the rollercoaster ride investors have endured.
As we tread further into the peculiar intersection of military technologies and Netflix, we encounter some unexpected companions on our scholarly journey. "War, Technology, and Experience aboard the USS Monitor" by Jones (2007) provides a historical account of naval technology, offering a glimpse into the evolution of military innovations.
On the entertainment side, "Streaming Literature: Exploring the World of Fiction through Online Platforms" by Smith (2019) explores the impact of streaming on literary adaptations and storytelling. While this might seem tangential to our research, diving into fiction can offer a refreshing break from the strenuous analysis of stock market data.
Speaking of fiction, let's not forget the classic "War and Peace" by Leo Tolstoy, a timeless tale of love and war. Though not directly related to military technologies or Netflix, the book's enduring popularity holds a mirror to society's fascination with conflicts and human drama, much like the captivating narratives we binge on streaming platforms.
In the world of internet memes, we can't overlook the iconic "Success Kid" meme, which embodies the triumphs and tribulations of stock market victories and defeats. And who can resist the infamous "Netflix and Chill" meme, a playful nod to the ubiquitous pastime of unwinding with streaming content, albeit at the expense of productivity.
As we blend the serious with the whimsical, it becomes evident that our research journey is akin to a military strategy meeting infused with the levity of a comedy show. With our analytical helmets firmly in place, we forge ahead, ready to uncover the unexpected connections between military technology education and the ascent and descent of Netflix's stock price.

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of Netflix (NFLX) uncovered an astonishingly tight correlation. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9900313, indicating a nearly perfect positive linear relationship between these two seemingly disparate entities. This numerical bond is so strong, it's like they were meant to be together, like peanut butter and jelly, or like a good movie and a rainy day.
In addition, our analysis revealed an r-squared value of 0.9801619. This means that a whopping 98.02% of the variability in Netflix's stock price can be attributed to the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences. It's like these two variables are in a committed relationship, finishing each other's sentences and always knowing what the other is thinking. Talk about a power couple!
Furthermore, our p-value, coming in at a measly < 0.01, reaffirms the robustness of our findings. This indicates that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship by random chance is less than 1%, which sounds like a match made in statistical heaven if you ask us.
And if numbers aren't your thing, fear not, for we have a visually appealing treat in store. Fig. 1 showcases a scatterplot that visually captures the undeniable correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and Netflix's stock price. It's like a visual love story unfolding before your eyes, displaying a clear pattern of mutual influence.
To summarize, our results support the notion that there is a remarkably strong and statistically significant connection between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and Netflix's stock price. It's a partnership that defies conventional wisdom, but as our data unequivocally demonstrates, it's a match made in heaven (or perhaps in the cloud).

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Well, folks, it looks like our data has gone boot camp on us, marching straight into the heart of a statistical war zone and emerging victorious. Our results have not only confirmed but gloriously amplified the prior research on the bizarre but tantalizing intersection of military technology education and Netflix's stock price.

Let's first address the penguin in the sauna – the unexpected companions in our literature review. While the historical naval technology account by Jones and the exploration of fiction through online platforms by Smith may have seemed like peculiar bedfellows, our results bring them into the fold with gusto. The military tech and Netflix connection is about as unexpected as a squirrel in a spacesuit, yet our research has revealed a correlation so tight it's like these two entities have been doing synchronized swimming all along.

The findings from Smith et al. (2015) and Doe (2018) set the stage for our glorious revelation. Smith et al.'s insights into the evolving curriculum of military technology education have presciently pointed us toward a wealth of market-influencing knowledge. Meanwhile, Doe's breakdown of Netflix's stock performance over the years has been as eye-opening as a cat getting a dog to play with. Our data now stands as a rib-tickling testament to the interconnectedness of these seemingly unrelated realms.

Our majestic correlation coefficient of 0.9900313 and a p-value that hits the floor at < 0.01 have redefined the boundaries of scholarly pursuit. It's like the stars aligned for an unimaginable duet, getting military tech and Netflix to produce some chart-topping harmony in the stock market. Not to mention, an r-squared value of 0.9801619? That's the statistical equivalent of a rom-com where the leads finish each other's sentences and wear matching sweaters – they're just meant to be together.

In conclusion—I mean, not in conclusion, because we don't have that yet—our data has strode triumphantly into the battleground of statistical analysis, revealing a bond between military technologies and Netflix stock that's tighter than a new pair of military-grade boots. This partnership has defied conventional academic norms and emerged as a victorious outlier, a statistical anomaly that's as awe-inspiring as a unicorn galloping through a finance conference.

So, as we wrap up this discussion, it's clear that military technology education and Netflix's stock price are more than just statistical bedfellows – they're the dynamic duo we never knew we needed, reshaping the landscape of scholarly inquiry with an unyielding, flavorful zest. And as the accolades pour in, we can only expect greater heights in our journey, leading the charge in redefining academic discourse with the unexpected allure of military tech and stock market stardom.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies and applied sciences and Netflix's stock price (NFLX). Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"March to the Bachelor's Degree Drum: How Military Tech and Netflix Stacks up in Stock"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This hard-hitting research paper sets out to investigate the seemingly unconquerable relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the fluctuating stock price of the streaming giant, Netflix (NFLX). Using a data-driven approach, our team delved into the abyss of statistical analysis, utilizing both the comprehensive National Center for Education Statistics and the towering LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). As we marched through our research, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9900313 and a p-value that landed squarely under 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. In this pursuit, we faced the unyielding challenge of disentangling the complexities of military tech and Netflix's stock behavior, all while maintaining a disciplined, structured methodology. Our findings not only enrich the scholarly landscape, but also lend a comedic twist to the otherwise austere world of academic inquiry. So, don your academic armor and get ready to march alongside us as we unravel the interconnectedness of military technology education and streaming stock success.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Buckle up, fellow researchers, because we are about to embark on a wild ride through the realms of military technology education and the capricious world of stock markets. In this paper, we set out to explore the correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of everyone's favorite binge-watching companion, Netflix (NFLX). As we march into the trenches of data analysis, we will navigate through the treacherous terrain of statistical significance and attempt to decode the enigmatic relationship between the military and the silver screen.
It might seem like an odd couple - military tech and Netflix - marching arm in arm in the stock market parade. But hey, stranger things have happened, right? Our aim is not only to uncover the statistical dance between these two seemingly incongruent players but also to inject a little humor and levity into the otherwise overly serious world of academic research. After all, who said number-crunching and data wrangling can't be a bit of fun?
So, grab your calculators and popcorn, because it's time to unearth the interconnectedness of military technology education and streaming stock success. Let's dive in, all guns blazing (metaphorically, of course).

[[RESULTS]]
Our investigation into the relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the stock price of Netflix (NFLX) uncovered an astonishingly tight correlation. We found a correlation coefficient of 0.9900313, indicating a nearly perfect positive linear relationship between these two seemingly disparate entities. This numerical bond is so strong, it's like they were meant to be together, like peanut butter and jelly, or like a good movie and a rainy day.
In addition, our analysis revealed an r-squared value of 0.9801619. This means that a whopping 98.02% of the variability in Netflix's stock price can be attributed to the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences. It's like these two variables are in a committed relationship, finishing each other's sentences and always knowing what the other is thinking. Talk about a power couple!
Furthermore, our p-value, coming in at a measly < 0.01, reaffirms the robustness of our findings. This indicates that the likelihood of observing such a strong relationship by random chance is less than 1%, which sounds like a match made in statistical heaven if you ask us.
And if numbers aren't your thing, fear not, for we have a visually appealing treat in store. Fig. 1 showcases a scatterplot that visually captures the undeniable correlation between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and Netflix's stock price. It's like a visual love story unfolding before your eyes, displaying a clear pattern of mutual influence.
To summarize, our results support the notion that there is a remarkably strong and statistically significant connection between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and Netflix's stock price. It's a partnership that defies conventional wisdom, but as our data unequivocally demonstrates, it's a match made in heaven (or perhaps in the cloud).

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

As we wrap up this rollicking journey through the unlikely union of military technology education and Netflix's stock price, it's clear that these two playmates have been more than just casual acquaintances in the market sandbox. Our findings have shed light on their unshakeable bond, like a well-matched rom-com duo, except in this case, one half of the duo is military tech education.

We've journeyed through stormy seas of statistical analysis, weathering the tempest of p-values and correlation coefficients, and emerged victorious with the discovery of a correlation coefficient akin to soulmates sharing an unbreakable bond. The r-squared value made it seem like Netflix's stock price was whispering sweet nothings to the military tech education degrees, with 98.02% of its variability attributing to this unique relationship.

But hey, don't just take our word for it – our scatterplot provides visual evidence of their inseparable connection, like a snapshot from a rom-com montage. This unexpected partnership may defy conventional logic, but as the numbers unequivocally attest, their bond is as sturdy as a tank and as influential as a blockbuster series.

So, where do we go from here? It's clear that this research has pushed boundaries and, dare we say, made statistical analysis a bit more entertaining. However, it seems that in this bizarre love match of military tech and streaming stocks, we've reached the zenith of curiosity. No need to march further into the hallowed halls of statistical investigation – it's time to hang up our lab coats and recognize that some relationships are just too inexplicable to need further probing.

In conclusion, the compatibility between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and Netflix's stock price is a match worthy of its own limited series – we've proven its existence, provided the laughs, and now it's time to roll the credits. No need for more research here – this unexpected partnership has certainly earned its final episode.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited March to the Bachelor's Degree Drum: How Military Tech and Netflix Stacks up in Stock. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Strategic Bachelor's Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited March to the Bachelor's Degree Drum: How Military Tech and Netflix Stacks up in Stock. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Interdisciplinary Institute for Military Innovation and Entertainment Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled March to the Bachelor's Degree Drum: How Military Tech and Netflix Stacks up in Stock with an abstract of This hard-hitting research paper sets out to investigate the seemingly unconquerable relationship between the number of Bachelor's degrees awarded in military technologies and applied sciences and the fluctuating stock price of the streaming giant, Netflix (NFLX). Using a data-driven approach, our team delved into the abyss of statistical analysis, utilizing both the comprehensive National Center for Education Statistics and the towering LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv). As we marched through our research, we discovered a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9900313 and a p-value that landed squarely under 0.01 for the period spanning from 2012 to 2021. In this pursuit, we faced the unyielding challenge of disentangling the complexities of military tech and Netflix's stock behavior, all while maintaining a disciplined, structured methodology. Our findings not only enrich the scholarly landscape, but also lend a comedic twist to the otherwise austere world of academic inquiry. So, don your academic armor and get ready to march alongside us as we unravel the interconnectedness of military technology education and streaming stock success.

ChatGPT:

bachelor's degree, military technology, applied sciences, stock price, Netflix, NFLX, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, p-value, National Center for Education Statistics, LSEG Analytics, Refinitiv, military tech education, streaming stock success

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies
Detailed data title: Bachelor's degrees conferred by postsecondary institutions, in field of study: Military technologies and applied sciences
Source: National Center for Education Statistics
See what else correlates with Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies

Netflix's stock price (NFLX)
Detailed data title: Opening price of Netflix (NFLX) on the first trading day of the year
Source: LSEG Analytics (Refinitiv)
Additional Info: Via Microsoft Excel Stockhistory function

See what else correlates with Netflix's stock price (NFLX)

Correlation r = 0.9900313 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9801619 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 98% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Netflix's stock price (NFLX)) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies) over the 10 years from 2012 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 4.3E-8. 0.0000000426905380056346900000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.99 in 4.3E-6% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 23,424,394 random variables You don't actually need 23 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 9 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 9 because we have two variables measured over a period of 10 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.96, 1 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies (Degrees awarded)8610518527635846965576711561524
Netflix's stock price (NFLX) (Stock price)10.0413.652.449.15109124.96196.1259.28326.1539




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([86,105,185,276,358,469,655,767,1156,1524,])
array_2 = np.array([10.04,13.6,52.4,49.15,109,124.96,196.1,259.28,326.1,539,])
array_1_name = "Bachelor's degrees awarded in Military technologies"
array_2_name = "Netflix's stock price (NFLX)"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Hats off to you for rating!


Correlation ID: 2652 · Black Variable ID: 1284 · Red Variable ID: 1584
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0