about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,633 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Final match set count at Chennai Open and the second variable is The number of music directors and composers in Idaho.  The chart goes from 2010 to 2020, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the final set count at the Chennai Open increased, so did the racket in the tennis world. This sent out powerful vibrations that resonated with the music industry in Idaho, inspiring more people to try their hand at composing. It's like the tennis players were acing their performances, serving as a major source of inspiration for the budding music directors and composers in Idaho, who couldn't help but produce some smashing tunes! As the on-court drama reached a crescendo, it seemed to strike a chord with the music enthusiasts in Idaho, ultimately leading to a net gain in the number of music directors and composers. It just go to show, when it comes to the Chennai Open and Idaho's music scene, it's all about that perfect match point!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of an epic, futuristic tennis match at the Chennai Open, where the players are engaged in intense rallies on a vibrant, high-tech court. Surrounding the players, portray music directors and composers from Idaho, with their futuristic musical instruments, absorbed in the creation of passionate melodies inspired by the match. Show the fusion of their music with the electrifying atmosphere, where the energy of the game and the creative sounds blend seamlessly, adding an otherworldly element to the scene. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Final match set count at Chennai Open and The number of music directors and composers in Idaho. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Vaporwave Oragami Futuristic a meme Data cyber art
ChatGPT: Futuristic

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Final match set count at Chennai Open and The number of music directors and composers in Idaho, in the following situation: The longer matches were leading to more musical inspiration during the tournament, which inadvertently attracted music directors and composers to Idaho in search of fresh ideas for their compositions.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: On the final day of the Chennai Open, the match set count was tied at 2-2. The intense back-and-forth rallies were creating an electrifying atmosphere, inspiring the music directors and composers from Idaho who had gathered around the court. As the players fought for every point, the passionate melodies of the music directors and composers could be heard, blending with the cheers of the crowd. The longer matches seemed to fuel their creativity, drawing them closer to the court in search of fresh musical inspiration.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Futuristic ] and depicting this scene: On the final day of the Chennai Open, the match set count was tied at 2-2. The intense back-and-forth rallies were creating an electrifying atmosphere, inspiring the music directors and composers from Idaho who had gathered around the court. As the players fought for every point, the passionate melodies of the music directors and composers could be heard, blending with the cheers of the crowd. The longer matches seemed to fuel their creativity, drawing them closer to the court in search of fresh musical inspiration. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of an epic, futuristic tennis match at the Chennai Open, where the players are engaged in intense rallies on a vibrant, high-tech court. Surrounding the players, portray music directors and composers from Idaho, with their futuristic musical instruments, absorbed in the creation of passionate melodies inspired by the match. Show the fusion of their music with the electrifying atmosphere, where the energy of the game and the creative sounds blend seamlessly, adding an otherworldly element to the scene.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Final match set count at Chennai Open caused The number of music directors and composers in Idaho to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Deuce or No Deuce? Unveiling the Tennis Music Connection: A Correlational Study of Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho

The Journal of Sports and Musicology

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Final match set count at Chennai Open and The number of music directors and composers in Idaho. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from Wikipedia and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8515707 and p < 0.01 for 2010 to 2020.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Deuce or No Deuce? Unveiling the Tennis Music Connection: A Correlational Study of Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between the Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho has long been a subject of speculation in both the sporting and music industries. In this study, we utilized data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to explore this curious and seemingly unrelated association. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8515707 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2020. This begs the question: is there a symphonic significance in the final set scores or is it merely a fortuitous concerto of coincidences? Our results provide empirical evidence to support the notion that the rhythm of the tennis court may indeed harmonize with the composition of music talents in Idaho. This paper not only sheds light on an unconventional correlation but also serves as a reminder that in the world of statistics, there is always room for a surprising twist and a punny conclusion.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Final match set count at Chennai Open and The number of music directors and composers in Idaho. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Deuce or No Deuce? Unveiling the Tennis Music Connection: A Correlational Study of Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between the Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho has long been a subject of speculation in both the sporting and music industries. In this study, we utilized data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to explore this curious and seemingly unrelated association. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8515707 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2020. This begs the question: is there a symphonic significance in the final set scores or is it merely a fortuitous concerto of coincidences? Our results provide empirical evidence to support the notion that the rhythm of the tennis court may indeed harmonize with the composition of music talents in Idaho. This paper not only sheds light on an unconventional correlation but also serves as a reminder that in the world of statistics, there is always room for a surprising twist and a punny conclusion.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of sports and music has long been an area of fascination, with unexpected links often hidden beneath the surface. In this study, we daringly embark on an exploration of the seemingly disparate worlds of tennis finals and the music industry. Specifically, we delve into the relationship between the Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open, a prestigious tennis tournament, and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in the less-renowned but no less significant state of Idaho.

As researchers, we are accustomed to unraveling complex relationships, but this particular investigation piqued our curiosity in a manner akin to a musician tuning an instrument before a performance. With a blend of skepticism and excitement, we set out to ascertain whether there exists a meaningful connection between the dramatic concluding sets at the Chennai Open and the creative forces behind the sounds of Idaho.

While some may view this inquiry as an improbable venture into uncharted statistical territory, the sheer unpredictability of scientific exploration is a reminder that the world of empirical research holds surprises at every turn. We are compelled to proceed with the ambition that our findings will not only uncover a noteworthy correlation but also infuse some levity and melody into the often austere domain of statistical inquiry. After all, as researchers, it is our duty to analyze, speculate, and occasionally harmonize unexpected variables in our pursuit of knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Final match set count at Chennai Open and The number of music directors and composers in Idaho. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Deuce or No Deuce? Unveiling the Tennis Music Connection: A Correlational Study of Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between the Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho has long been a subject of speculation in both the sporting and music industries. In this study, we utilized data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to explore this curious and seemingly unrelated association. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8515707 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2020. This begs the question: is there a symphonic significance in the final set scores or is it merely a fortuitous concerto of coincidences? Our results provide empirical evidence to support the notion that the rhythm of the tennis court may indeed harmonize with the composition of music talents in Idaho. This paper not only sheds light on an unconventional correlation but also serves as a reminder that in the world of statistics, there is always room for a surprising twist and a punny conclusion.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of sports and music has long been an area of fascination, with unexpected links often hidden beneath the surface. In this study, we daringly embark on an exploration of the seemingly disparate worlds of tennis finals and the music industry. Specifically, we delve into the relationship between the Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open, a prestigious tennis tournament, and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in the less-renowned but no less significant state of Idaho.
As researchers, we are accustomed to unraveling complex relationships, but this particular investigation piqued our curiosity in a manner akin to a musician tuning an instrument before a performance. With a blend of skepticism and excitement, we set out to ascertain whether there exists a meaningful connection between the dramatic concluding sets at the Chennai Open and the creative forces behind the sounds of Idaho.
While some may view this inquiry as an improbable venture into uncharted statistical territory, the sheer unpredictability of scientific exploration is a reminder that the world of empirical research holds surprises at every turn. We are compelled to proceed with the ambition that our findings will not only uncover a noteworthy correlation but also infuse some levity and melody into the often austere domain of statistical inquiry. After all, as researchers, it is our duty to analyze, speculate, and occasionally harmonize unexpected variables in our pursuit of knowledge.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of the Final Match Set Count at various tennis tournaments worldwide, focusing on its potential correlations with seemingly unrelated factors. While their study primarily centered on player strategies and match outcomes, it inadvertently hinted at the possibility of underlying connections with domains beyond the tennis court. Similarly, Jones (2018) delved into the demographics of music professionals across different U.S. states, providing a detailed account of the regional distribution of composers, conductors, and music directors.

The uncovering of such an unexpected relationship between the Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho prompts a reconsideration of statistical paradigms. As we navigate this peculiar territory, it becomes evident that a rich tapestry of knowledge can be woven from seemingly dissonant threads.

Moving beyond the traditional "straight sets" of statistical analysis, we find ourselves at the crossroads of literary exploration. Works such as "The Signal and the Noise" by Nate Silver and "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner provide a refreshing lens through which to view seemingly incongruous correlations. Meanwhile, fictional narratives such as "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown and "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams offer a tongue-in-cheek perspective on unraveling mysteries that transcend conventional wisdom.

The research journey into the unexpected links between sports and music also draws inspiration from the domain of television. Engaging with shows such as "Mozart in the Jungle" and "Ted Lasso" offers an unconventional glimpse into the realms of orchestral music and sports, inspiring researchers to seek uncharted paths in their pursuit of correlations.

While the path ahead may be as unpredictable as a topspin lob on a grass court, we are eager to present a literature review that not only acknowledges the seriousness of statistical inquiry but also injects a touch of whimsy into the exploration of this uncharted statistical territory. After all, in the pursuit of knowledge, as in a riveting tennis match, a well-timed volley of humor and unexpected findings can serve as an ace up the researcher's sleeve.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Final match set count at Chennai Open and The number of music directors and composers in Idaho. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2010 to 2020

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Deuce or No Deuce? Unveiling the Tennis Music Connection: A Correlational Study of Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between the Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho has long been a subject of speculation in both the sporting and music industries. In this study, we utilized data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to explore this curious and seemingly unrelated association. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8515707 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2020. This begs the question: is there a symphonic significance in the final set scores or is it merely a fortuitous concerto of coincidences? Our results provide empirical evidence to support the notion that the rhythm of the tennis court may indeed harmonize with the composition of music talents in Idaho. This paper not only sheds light on an unconventional correlation but also serves as a reminder that in the world of statistics, there is always room for a surprising twist and a punny conclusion.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of sports and music has long been an area of fascination, with unexpected links often hidden beneath the surface. In this study, we daringly embark on an exploration of the seemingly disparate worlds of tennis finals and the music industry. Specifically, we delve into the relationship between the Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open, a prestigious tennis tournament, and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in the less-renowned but no less significant state of Idaho.
As researchers, we are accustomed to unraveling complex relationships, but this particular investigation piqued our curiosity in a manner akin to a musician tuning an instrument before a performance. With a blend of skepticism and excitement, we set out to ascertain whether there exists a meaningful connection between the dramatic concluding sets at the Chennai Open and the creative forces behind the sounds of Idaho.
While some may view this inquiry as an improbable venture into uncharted statistical territory, the sheer unpredictability of scientific exploration is a reminder that the world of empirical research holds surprises at every turn. We are compelled to proceed with the ambition that our findings will not only uncover a noteworthy correlation but also infuse some levity and melody into the often austere domain of statistical inquiry. After all, as researchers, it is our duty to analyze, speculate, and occasionally harmonize unexpected variables in our pursuit of knowledge.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the enigmatic connection between the Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho, we employed a methodological approach that blended scholarly rigor with a hint of symphonic spontaneity. Our data collection efforts traversed the expanses of the internet, with notable reliance on sources such as Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Despite the unconventional nature of our research question, we were determined to harness the power of statistics to elucidate this seemingly improbable relationship.

Data Acquisition:
The first movement in our methodological symphony involved the collection of relevant data. Utilizing a harmonious fusion of web scraping techniques and keen-eyed scrutiny of publicly available information, we acquired the Final Match Set Counts at Chennai Open spanning the years 2010 to 2020. Concurrently, we were equally diligent in sourcing the number of music directors and composers in the melodic realm of Idaho over the same temporal span. Our data, much like the introductory notes of a grand concerto, required careful tuning to ensure accuracy and reliability.

Statistical Analysis:
With our melodic data in hand, we orchestrated a series of statistical analyses to elucidate the potential correlations between these contrasting variables. We conducted a Pearson correlation coefficient analysis, akin to identifying the harmonious chords in a piece of music, to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship. The p-value, a measure of statistical significance, provided a crescendo of insight into the robustness of any observed connections.

Control Variables:
As any seasoned researcher knows, the subtleties of correlation demand vigilance in controlling for extraneous influences. In our case, considerations of external factors such as global economic trends, technological advancements, and the cultural landscape of both the tennis and music spheres were meticulously orchestrated to prevent any discordant notes from skewing our findings.

Interdisciplinary Interpretation:
Given the unconventional nature of our investigation, we sought to intertwine the findings from our statistical analyses with insights from the realms of sports psychology and music theory. This interdisciplinary approach, akin to a collaborative improvisation between instrumentalists, enriched our interpretation of the observed correlations and lent depth to our conclusions.

Ethical Considerations:
In the spirit of transparency and scientific integrity, we diligently adhered to ethical guidelines in data acquisition and analysis. Our commitment to scholarly conduct mirrored the unwavering adherence to musical standards in a prestigious symphony orchestra, ensuring that the harmony of our research remained untarnished.

In essence, our methodological approach combined the precision of statistical analysis with the creative nuances of musical composition, resulting in a symphonic exploration of the relationship between the Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Final match set count at Chennai Open and The number of music directors and composers in Idaho. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Wikipedia and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2010 to 2020, you found a correlation 0.8515707, r-squared of 0.7251726, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Deuce or No Deuce? Unveiling the Tennis Music Connection: A Correlational Study of Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between the Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho has long been a subject of speculation in both the sporting and music industries. In this study, we utilized data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to explore this curious and seemingly unrelated association. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8515707 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2020. This begs the question: is there a symphonic significance in the final set scores or is it merely a fortuitous concerto of coincidences? Our results provide empirical evidence to support the notion that the rhythm of the tennis court may indeed harmonize with the composition of music talents in Idaho. This paper not only sheds light on an unconventional correlation but also serves as a reminder that in the world of statistics, there is always room for a surprising twist and a punny conclusion.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of sports and music has long been an area of fascination, with unexpected links often hidden beneath the surface. In this study, we daringly embark on an exploration of the seemingly disparate worlds of tennis finals and the music industry. Specifically, we delve into the relationship between the Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open, a prestigious tennis tournament, and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in the less-renowned but no less significant state of Idaho.
As researchers, we are accustomed to unraveling complex relationships, but this particular investigation piqued our curiosity in a manner akin to a musician tuning an instrument before a performance. With a blend of skepticism and excitement, we set out to ascertain whether there exists a meaningful connection between the dramatic concluding sets at the Chennai Open and the creative forces behind the sounds of Idaho.
While some may view this inquiry as an improbable venture into uncharted statistical territory, the sheer unpredictability of scientific exploration is a reminder that the world of empirical research holds surprises at every turn. We are compelled to proceed with the ambition that our findings will not only uncover a noteworthy correlation but also infuse some levity and melody into the often austere domain of statistical inquiry. After all, as researchers, it is our duty to analyze, speculate, and occasionally harmonize unexpected variables in our pursuit of knowledge.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The statistical analysis of the relationship between the Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho yielded intriguing results. Our investigation revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8515707, suggesting a strong positive association between these seemingly incongruous variables. The r-squared value of 0.7251726 further corroborated the strength of this relationship, indicating that approximately 72.5% of the variance in the number of music directors and composers in Idaho could be explained by the final match set count at the Chennai Open. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the evidence supporting this association is decidedly robust, inferring that the likelihood of this correlation occurring by mere chance is quite low.

To visually encapsulate this unexpected connection, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot displaying the clear and striking relationship between the final match set count at the Chennai Open and the number of music directors and composers in the gem state of Idaho.

These findings prompt contemplation on the orchestration of events that may be at play. Does the intensity of the final sets in tennis matches somehow resonate with the creative endeavors of music directors and composers in Idaho? One could argue that the crescendo of a thrilling tennis match sets the stage for a symphony of composition talents in the realm of music. Alternatively, perhaps it is simply a harmonious serendipity, akin to the perfectly synchronized sonority of a well-arranged melody. Regardless, our results shed light on this unique correlation, emphasizing the unpredictable, often lyrical nature of statistical inquiry and the potential for unexpected serendipitous findings.

In conclusion, this statistical exploration not only uncovers an unanticipated correlation between the zenith of tennis matches and the creative forces behind Idaho's music industry, but also serves as a melodious reminder that in the world of research, the most harmonious connections are often composed of the most unexpected variables.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Final match set count at Chennai Open and The number of music directors and composers in Idaho. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Deuce or No Deuce? Unveiling the Tennis Music Connection: A Correlational Study of Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between the Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho has long been a subject of speculation in both the sporting and music industries. In this study, we utilized data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to explore this curious and seemingly unrelated association. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8515707 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2020. This begs the question: is there a symphonic significance in the final set scores or is it merely a fortuitous concerto of coincidences? Our results provide empirical evidence to support the notion that the rhythm of the tennis court may indeed harmonize with the composition of music talents in Idaho. This paper not only sheds light on an unconventional correlation but also serves as a reminder that in the world of statistics, there is always room for a surprising twist and a punny conclusion.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their seminal work, Smith and Doe (2015) conducted a comprehensive analysis of the Final Match Set Count at various tennis tournaments worldwide, focusing on its potential correlations with seemingly unrelated factors. While their study primarily centered on player strategies and match outcomes, it inadvertently hinted at the possibility of underlying connections with domains beyond the tennis court. Similarly, Jones (2018) delved into the demographics of music professionals across different U.S. states, providing a detailed account of the regional distribution of composers, conductors, and music directors.
The uncovering of such an unexpected relationship between the Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho prompts a reconsideration of statistical paradigms. As we navigate this peculiar territory, it becomes evident that a rich tapestry of knowledge can be woven from seemingly dissonant threads.
Moving beyond the traditional "straight sets" of statistical analysis, we find ourselves at the crossroads of literary exploration. Works such as "The Signal and the Noise" by Nate Silver and "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner provide a refreshing lens through which to view seemingly incongruous correlations. Meanwhile, fictional narratives such as "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown and "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" by Douglas Adams offer a tongue-in-cheek perspective on unraveling mysteries that transcend conventional wisdom.
The research journey into the unexpected links between sports and music also draws inspiration from the domain of television. Engaging with shows such as "Mozart in the Jungle" and "Ted Lasso" offers an unconventional glimpse into the realms of orchestral music and sports, inspiring researchers to seek uncharted paths in their pursuit of correlations.
While the path ahead may be as unpredictable as a topspin lob on a grass court, we are eager to present a literature review that not only acknowledges the seriousness of statistical inquiry but also injects a touch of whimsy into the exploration of this uncharted statistical territory. After all, in the pursuit of knowledge, as in a riveting tennis match, a well-timed volley of humor and unexpected findings can serve as an ace up the researcher's sleeve.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between the Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho yielded intriguing results. Our investigation revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8515707, suggesting a strong positive association between these seemingly incongruous variables. The r-squared value of 0.7251726 further corroborated the strength of this relationship, indicating that approximately 72.5% of the variance in the number of music directors and composers in Idaho could be explained by the final match set count at the Chennai Open. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the evidence supporting this association is decidedly robust, inferring that the likelihood of this correlation occurring by mere chance is quite low.
To visually encapsulate this unexpected connection, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot displaying the clear and striking relationship between the final match set count at the Chennai Open and the number of music directors and composers in the gem state of Idaho.
These findings prompt contemplation on the orchestration of events that may be at play. Does the intensity of the final sets in tennis matches somehow resonate with the creative endeavors of music directors and composers in Idaho? One could argue that the crescendo of a thrilling tennis match sets the stage for a symphony of composition talents in the realm of music. Alternatively, perhaps it is simply a harmonious serendipity, akin to the perfectly synchronized sonority of a well-arranged melody. Regardless, our results shed light on this unique correlation, emphasizing the unpredictable, often lyrical nature of statistical inquiry and the potential for unexpected serendipitous findings.
In conclusion, this statistical exploration not only uncovers an unanticipated correlation between the zenith of tennis matches and the creative forces behind Idaho's music industry, but also serves as a melodious reminder that in the world of research, the most harmonious connections are often composed of the most unexpected variables.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our research has unveiled an unexpected and symphonic relationship between the Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho. This somewhat surprising discovery echoes the whimsical musings of Smith and Doe (2015), who, in their earnest analysis of tennis tournament dynamics, perhaps inadvertently set the stage for our exploration of seemingly disparate variables. Similarly, while Jones (2018) meticulously chronicled the demographics of music professionals across different U.S. states, little did they know that their work would resonate with our own serendipitous findings.

The robust correlation coefficient of 0.8515707 that we observed aligns with the spirit of unpredictable correlations and interconnectedness elucidated by Silver, Levitt, Dubner, and other literary provocateurs in the domain of statistical inquiry. Our results not only affirm an intriguing link between the competitive fervor of the Chennai Open and the artistic fervor of Idaho's music scene, but they also reinforce the notion that statistical exploration can lead to seemingly discordant yet resonant conclusions.

It is tempting to attribute this unforeseen musical-tournament association to a grand orchestration of fate, where the final sets of a tennis match serve as a prelude to the harmonious notes of compositions emanating from the Gem State. Alternatively, one could wax poetic and argue that this correlation is akin to a finely tuned melody, composed of the most unexpected variables, including those from the realm of sports and entertainment.

Our study not only enriches the literature on unanticipated statistical associations but also serves as a refreshing reminder that in the world of empirical inquiry, the grooves and harmonies of apparently unrelated variables can merge to form a compelling composition of evidence. While the statistical literature often emphasizes the "significance" of findings, we urge readers to also appreciate the "symphony" of chance and synchronicity that underpins many research endeavors.

As we conclude this discussion, we echo the sentiments of the eloquent Nate Silver, the jocular Steven Levitt, and the ever-curious Douglas Adams, for their works have inspired a nuanced and light-hearted approach to exploring statistical mysteries. In the grand concerto of scientific inquiry, may we continue to find joy in the unexpected correlations and embrace the melodies of serendipity that underscore our pursuit of knowledge.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a witty academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a statistics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Final match set count at Chennai Open and The number of music directors and composers in Idaho. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Deuce or No Deuce? Unveiling the Tennis Music Connection: A Correlational Study of Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho"

[[ABSTRACT]]
The connection between the Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho has long been a subject of speculation in both the sporting and music industries. In this study, we utilized data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to explore this curious and seemingly unrelated association. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8515707 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2020. This begs the question: is there a symphonic significance in the final set scores or is it merely a fortuitous concerto of coincidences? Our results provide empirical evidence to support the notion that the rhythm of the tennis court may indeed harmonize with the composition of music talents in Idaho. This paper not only sheds light on an unconventional correlation but also serves as a reminder that in the world of statistics, there is always room for a surprising twist and a punny conclusion.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of sports and music has long been an area of fascination, with unexpected links often hidden beneath the surface. In this study, we daringly embark on an exploration of the seemingly disparate worlds of tennis finals and the music industry. Specifically, we delve into the relationship between the Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open, a prestigious tennis tournament, and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in the less-renowned but no less significant state of Idaho.
As researchers, we are accustomed to unraveling complex relationships, but this particular investigation piqued our curiosity in a manner akin to a musician tuning an instrument before a performance. With a blend of skepticism and excitement, we set out to ascertain whether there exists a meaningful connection between the dramatic concluding sets at the Chennai Open and the creative forces behind the sounds of Idaho.
While some may view this inquiry as an improbable venture into uncharted statistical territory, the sheer unpredictability of scientific exploration is a reminder that the world of empirical research holds surprises at every turn. We are compelled to proceed with the ambition that our findings will not only uncover a noteworthy correlation but also infuse some levity and melody into the often austere domain of statistical inquiry. After all, as researchers, it is our duty to analyze, speculate, and occasionally harmonize unexpected variables in our pursuit of knowledge.

[[RESULTS]]
The statistical analysis of the relationship between the Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho yielded intriguing results. Our investigation revealed a remarkably robust correlation coefficient of 0.8515707, suggesting a strong positive association between these seemingly incongruous variables. The r-squared value of 0.7251726 further corroborated the strength of this relationship, indicating that approximately 72.5% of the variance in the number of music directors and composers in Idaho could be explained by the final match set count at the Chennai Open. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the evidence supporting this association is decidedly robust, inferring that the likelihood of this correlation occurring by mere chance is quite low.
To visually encapsulate this unexpected connection, we present Figure 1, a scatterplot displaying the clear and striking relationship between the final match set count at the Chennai Open and the number of music directors and composers in the gem state of Idaho.
These findings prompt contemplation on the orchestration of events that may be at play. Does the intensity of the final sets in tennis matches somehow resonate with the creative endeavors of music directors and composers in Idaho? One could argue that the crescendo of a thrilling tennis match sets the stage for a symphony of composition talents in the realm of music. Alternatively, perhaps it is simply a harmonious serendipity, akin to the perfectly synchronized sonority of a well-arranged melody. Regardless, our results shed light on this unique correlation, emphasizing the unpredictable, often lyrical nature of statistical inquiry and the potential for unexpected serendipitous findings.
In conclusion, this statistical exploration not only uncovers an unanticipated correlation between the zenith of tennis matches and the creative forces behind Idaho's music industry, but also serves as a melodious reminder that in the world of research, the most harmonious connections are often composed of the most unexpected variables.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In this study, we have embarked on an unconventional journey into the world of statistics, where the rhythm of the tennis court meets the composition of musical talents in Idaho. We have unraveled a surprising and statistically robust correlation between the final match set count at the Chennai Open and the number of music directors and composers in the gem state of Idaho. The strength of this relationship not only raises eyebrows but also strikes a harmonious chord with the notion that statistical inquiry is often filled with unexpected symphonies.

Is there a grand symphonic significance in the final set scores, or is it simply an orchestrated concerto of coincidences? Our findings suggest that the crescendo of a thrilling tennis match may indeed set the stage for a symphony of composition talents in the state of Idaho. The statistical evidence presented here not only enhances our understanding of the interconnectedness between diverse domains but also orchestrates a humble reminder that in the world of research, the most striking correlations are often composed of the most unexpected variables.

With that said, it is evident that further research in this area may be akin to over-analyzing the timing of a musical crescendo or dissecting the comedic timing of a well-delivered pun. In other words, no further research is needed in this area; the symphony has played its last note.

We hope our findings bring a light-hearted aria to the often austere world of statistical inquiry and serve as a reminder that in the pursuit of knowledge, there is always room for a surprising twist and a punny conclusion.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Deuce or No Deuce? Unveiling the Tennis Music Connection: A Correlational Study of Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Sports and Musicology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Deuce or No Deuce? Unveiling the Tennis Music Connection: A Correlational Study of Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Musical and Athletic Correlations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Deuce or No Deuce? Unveiling the Tennis Music Connection: A Correlational Study of Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho with an abstract of The connection between the Final Match Set Count at Chennai Open and the Number of Music Directors and Composers in Idaho has long been a subject of speculation in both the sporting and music industries. In this study, we utilized data from Wikipedia and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to explore this curious and seemingly unrelated association. Our findings revealed a surprisingly strong correlation coefficient of 0.8515707 and p < 0.01 for the period spanning 2010 to 2020. This begs the question: is there a symphonic significance in the final set scores or is it merely a fortuitous concerto of coincidences? Our results provide empirical evidence to support the notion that the rhythm of the tennis court may indeed harmonize with the composition of music talents in Idaho. This paper not only sheds light on an unconventional correlation but also serves as a reminder that in the world of statistics, there is always room for a surprising twist and a punny conclusion.

ChatGPT:

Final Match Set Count, Chennai Open, Music Directors, Composers, Idaho, correlation study, tennis, music industry, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Wikipedia, symphonic significance, empirical evidence, statistical analysis, correlation coefficient, tennis court rhythm, music talents

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Final match set count at Chennai Open
Source: Wikipedia
See what else correlates with Final match set count at Chennai Open

The number of music directors and composers in Idaho
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of music directors and composers in Idaho
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of music directors and composers in Idaho

Correlation r = 0.8515707 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7251726 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 72.5% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of music directors and composers in Idaho) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Final match set count at Chennai Open) over the 11 years from 2010 through 2020.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 0.00088. 0.0008796447782339106000000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 0.088% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 1,137 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 10 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 10 because we have two variables measured over a period of 11 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.51, 0.96 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20102011201220132014201520162017201820192020
Final match set count at Chennai Open (Count of sets)23332222233
The number of music directors and composers in Idaho (Laborers)110240220160901107040100140180




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([2,3,3,3,2,2,2,2,2,3,3,])
array_2 = np.array([110,240,220,160,90,110,70,40,100,140,180,])
array_1_name = "Final match set count at Chennai Open"
array_2_name = "The number of music directors and composers in Idaho"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation inspection deserves a standing ovation!


Correlation ID: 2633 · Black Variable ID: 109 · Red Variable ID: 18008
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0