about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,619 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Solar power generated in Cambodia and the second variable is Google searches for 'that is sus'.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the solar panels soaked up the sun's rays, they inadvertently beamed a message to gamers worldwide: "Amidst the photons and electrons, beware of impostor photons trying to sabotage the energy grid in an electrifying game of solar Among Us." Remember, always keep your solar panels crewmate!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of a Cambodian village landscape with solar panels glistening under the bright sun, casting a warm glow over the village. In the foreground, depict villagers using their smartphones, immersed in online gaming, with furrowed brows and engaged in discussions about suspicious moves. Show the solar panels emitting a radiant halo effect. Within the virtual world depicted on the phone screens, showcase a virtual power struggle being illuminated by a surge of 'that is sus' Google searches. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Solar power generated in Cambodia and Google searches for 'that is sus'. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Brutalism A scene from Skyrim Celtic art Surrealism An image that looks like it is a scene from a Pixar movie
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Solar power generated in Cambodia and Google searches for 'that is sus', in the following situation: The surplus solar energy is believed to be creating an unusual electromagnetic field, causing a surge in online gaming and leading to more instances of suspicious behavior in the virtual world. This has led to an increase in the popular phrase search 'that is sus' as players try to suss out the imposters among them. It's a real power play in the world of solar-generated suspicion!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a Cambodian village, solar panels gleam under the bright sun, generating power for nearby homes. Meanwhile, on glowing phone screens, players immersed in online gaming are furrowing their brows and talking about suspicious moves. The surge in solar power creates an unusual halo effect around the panels, and in the virtual world, the surge in 'that is sus' Google searches illuminates a virtual power struggle.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: In a Cambodian village, solar panels gleam under the bright sun, generating power for nearby homes. Meanwhile, on glowing phone screens, players immersed in online gaming are furrowing their brows and talking about suspicious moves. The surge in solar power creates an unusual halo effect around the panels, and in the virtual world, the surge in 'that is sus' Google searches illuminates a virtual power struggle. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of a Cambodian village landscape with solar panels glistening under the bright sun, casting a warm glow over the village. In the foreground, depict villagers using their smartphones, immersed in online gaming, with furrowed brows and engaged in discussions about suspicious moves. Show the solar panels emitting a radiant halo effect. Within the virtual world depicted on the phone screens, showcase a virtual power struggle being illuminated by a surge of 'that is sus' Google searches.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in Solar power generated in Cambodia caused that is sus (Google searches for 'that is sus') to increase. Add a funny one-liner at the end.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Shine a Light on Solar Sus-picion: The Illuminating Link Between Solar Power in Cambodia and Google Searches for 'That is Sus'

The Journal of Global Energy Innovation and Socio-Digital Trends

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Solar power generated in Cambodia and Google searches for 'that is sus'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Include a pun in the title.

Your research team used data from Energy Information Administration and Google Trends to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9740739 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Shine a Light on Solar Sus-picion: The Illuminating Link Between Solar Power in Cambodia and Google Searches for 'That is Sus'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to shed light on the curious relationship between solar power generation in Cambodia and the frequency of Google searches for the popular catchphrase "that is sus." Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our research team conducted an in-depth analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2021. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9740739 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our research suggests that as solar power generation in Cambodia increases, so does the tendency for online users to express suspicion, generating searches for "that is sus." This might just be the first documented case of solar-induced sus-picion!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Solar power generated in Cambodia and Google searches for 'that is sus'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shine a Light on Solar Sus-picion: The Illuminating Link Between Solar Power in Cambodia and Google Searches for 'That is Sus'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to shed light on the curious relationship between solar power generation in Cambodia and the frequency of Google searches for the popular catchphrase "that is sus." Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our research team conducted an in-depth analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2021. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9740739 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our research suggests that as solar power generation in Cambodia increases, so does the tendency for online users to express suspicion, generating searches for "that is sus." This might just be the first documented case of solar-induced sus-picion!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The intersection of solar power and suspicious behavior may seem like an unlikely pairing, much like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole, but it is exactly this unexpected connection that has sparked our curiosity. The emergence of the catchphrase "that is sus" in popular culture, often associated with online gaming and social interactions, has piqued the interest of researchers across disciplines. However, the correlation between the solar energy industry in Cambodia and the frequency of Google searches for "that is sus" has remained a puzzling enigma, much like solving a Rubik's cube without peeling off the stickers.

Solar power represents a beacon of hope for sustainable energy, harnessing the power of the sun to illuminate our world and reduce reliance on non-renewable resources. On the other hand, the phrase "that is sus" has become a shorthand for expressing suspicion or skepticism in the digital realm, often as a playful or ironic commentary on online interactions. Uniting these two seemingly unrelated phenomena feels akin to mixing oil and water - an endeavor that presents an intellectual challenge captivating researchers with the allure of uncovering an unexpected discovery, much like stumbling upon a rare Pokémon in the tall grass.

In this study, we delve into the depths of data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, embarking on a statistical expedition to illuminate the potential link between solar power generation in Cambodia and the prevalence of suspicion-laden Google searches. Our quest is fueled by a desire to unravel this mystery and shed light on a connection that, at first glance, may seem as implausible as finding the Loch Ness Monster vacationing in the Caribbean.

As we navigate through the labyrinth of data analysis and statistical inference, we invite the reader to join us on this scientific escapade, where hypotheses are both tested and entertained, and where unexpected correlations are unearthed, much like stumbling across buried treasure during a leisurely stroll on the beach. We aim to present not only the quantitative findings but also to infuse this investigation with a sprinkle of scientific humor and intellectual delight, much like adding a dash of paprika to a meticulously crafted dish.

Without further ado, let us embark on a journey of exploration, where solar power and suspicion intersect in an unexpected dance, much like a scientific tango performed under the starry skies.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Solar power generated in Cambodia and Google searches for 'that is sus'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some cartoons and childrens' shows that you watched that are related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shine a Light on Solar Sus-picion: The Illuminating Link Between Solar Power in Cambodia and Google Searches for 'That is Sus'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to shed light on the curious relationship between solar power generation in Cambodia and the frequency of Google searches for the popular catchphrase "that is sus." Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our research team conducted an in-depth analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2021. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9740739 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our research suggests that as solar power generation in Cambodia increases, so does the tendency for online users to express suspicion, generating searches for "that is sus." This might just be the first documented case of solar-induced sus-picion!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of solar power and suspicious behavior may seem like an unlikely pairing, much like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole, but it is exactly this unexpected connection that has sparked our curiosity. The emergence of the catchphrase "that is sus" in popular culture, often associated with online gaming and social interactions, has piqued the interest of researchers across disciplines. However, the correlation between the solar energy industry in Cambodia and the frequency of Google searches for "that is sus" has remained a puzzling enigma, much like solving a Rubik's cube without peeling off the stickers.
Solar power represents a beacon of hope for sustainable energy, harnessing the power of the sun to illuminate our world and reduce reliance on non-renewable resources. On the other hand, the phrase "that is sus" has become a shorthand for expressing suspicion or skepticism in the digital realm, often as a playful or ironic commentary on online interactions. Uniting these two seemingly unrelated phenomena feels akin to mixing oil and water - an endeavor that presents an intellectual challenge captivating researchers with the allure of uncovering an unexpected discovery, much like stumbling upon a rare Pokémon in the tall grass.
In this study, we delve into the depths of data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, embarking on a statistical expedition to illuminate the potential link between solar power generation in Cambodia and the prevalence of suspicion-laden Google searches. Our quest is fueled by a desire to unravel this mystery and shed light on a connection that, at first glance, may seem as implausible as finding the Loch Ness Monster vacationing in the Caribbean.
As we navigate through the labyrinth of data analysis and statistical inference, we invite the reader to join us on this scientific escapade, where hypotheses are both tested and entertained, and where unexpected correlations are unearthed, much like stumbling across buried treasure during a leisurely stroll on the beach. We aim to present not only the quantitative findings but also to infuse this investigation with a sprinkle of scientific humor and intellectual delight, much like adding a dash of paprika to a meticulously crafted dish.
Without further ado, let us embark on a journey of exploration, where solar power and suspicion intersect in an unexpected dance, much like a scientific tango performed under the starry skies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find a link between solar power generation and environmental sustainability in developing countries. The work of Doe et al. further explores the potential of renewable energy sources to mitigate climate change impacts in Southeast Asia. Jones' research sheds light on the growing significance of solar power in Cambodia's energy landscape, emphasizing the potential for economic and environmental benefits.

Turning to the world of non-fiction books, "The Solar Revolution" by Travis Bradford presents a comprehensive overview of the solar energy industry's evolution, while "The Power of Suspicion" by John Doe delves into the psychological underpinnings of suspicion in modern society. These serious tomes offer valuable insights into our topic of inquiry, providing a solid foundation for our investigation.

As we venture into the realm of fiction, "Solaris" by Stanislaw Lem captures the intrigue of a mysterious planet that defies human understanding - a fitting parallel to our quest for understanding the enigmatic connection between solar power in Cambodia and Google searches for "that is sus." "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown, although not directly related, resonates with the theme of unraveling cryptic patterns, lending an aura of intrigue to our pursuit of unconventional correlations.

In the context of animated series, "Phineas and Ferb" playfully explores the adventures of two inventive stepbrothers, often engaging in far-fetched schemes - a whimsical mirror to our endeavor to unravel the peculiar relationship between solar power and online suspicion. Additionally, "Scooby-Doo" and the gang's knack for solving mysterious phenomena offers a lighthearted analogy to our investigative approach, as we aim to demystify the unexpected connection between sustainable energy and digital skepticism.

In sum, while the initial scholarly works paint a sober picture of solar power and sustainability, we shall not shy away from infusing our exploration with a touch of humor and unconventional parallels, much like adding sprinkles of unexpected flavors to an ordinary dish.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Solar power generated in Cambodia and Google searches for 'that is sus'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Google Trends . You used data from 2004 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shine a Light on Solar Sus-picion: The Illuminating Link Between Solar Power in Cambodia and Google Searches for 'That is Sus'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to shed light on the curious relationship between solar power generation in Cambodia and the frequency of Google searches for the popular catchphrase "that is sus." Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our research team conducted an in-depth analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2021. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9740739 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our research suggests that as solar power generation in Cambodia increases, so does the tendency for online users to express suspicion, generating searches for "that is sus." This might just be the first documented case of solar-induced sus-picion!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The intersection of solar power and suspicious behavior may seem like an unlikely pairing, much like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole, but it is exactly this unexpected connection that has sparked our curiosity. The emergence of the catchphrase "that is sus" in popular culture, often associated with online gaming and social interactions, has piqued the interest of researchers across disciplines. However, the correlation between the solar energy industry in Cambodia and the frequency of Google searches for "that is sus" has remained a puzzling enigma, much like solving a Rubik's cube without peeling off the stickers.
Solar power represents a beacon of hope for sustainable energy, harnessing the power of the sun to illuminate our world and reduce reliance on non-renewable resources. On the other hand, the phrase "that is sus" has become a shorthand for expressing suspicion or skepticism in the digital realm, often as a playful or ironic commentary on online interactions. Uniting these two seemingly unrelated phenomena feels akin to mixing oil and water - an endeavor that presents an intellectual challenge captivating researchers with the allure of uncovering an unexpected discovery, much like stumbling upon a rare Pokémon in the tall grass.
In this study, we delve into the depths of data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, embarking on a statistical expedition to illuminate the potential link between solar power generation in Cambodia and the prevalence of suspicion-laden Google searches. Our quest is fueled by a desire to unravel this mystery and shed light on a connection that, at first glance, may seem as implausible as finding the Loch Ness Monster vacationing in the Caribbean.
As we navigate through the labyrinth of data analysis and statistical inference, we invite the reader to join us on this scientific escapade, where hypotheses are both tested and entertained, and where unexpected correlations are unearthed, much like stumbling across buried treasure during a leisurely stroll on the beach. We aim to present not only the quantitative findings but also to infuse this investigation with a sprinkle of scientific humor and intellectual delight, much like adding a dash of paprika to a meticulously crafted dish.
Without further ado, let us embark on a journey of exploration, where solar power and suspicion intersect in an unexpected dance, much like a scientific tango performed under the starry skies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In order to investigate the peculiar relationship between solar power generation in Cambodia and the frequency of "that is sus" Google searches, our research team deployed a multidimensional approach that was as intricate as a Rube Goldberg machine and as precise as a laser beam in a laboratory. The methodology was designed to capture the complexity and nuance of this seemingly unlikely association, much like attempting to unravel a convoluted mystery plot worthy of Sherlock Holmes himself.

Data Collection:
The first stage of our methodological escapade involved the meticulous collection of data from reputable sources, recognizing that thorough data collection is the cornerstone of sound research, much like assembling the essential ingredients for a scientific experiment. Specifically, we sourced historical data on solar power generation in Cambodia from the Energy Information Administration, hoping that this data would serve as our guiding North Star through the uncharted waters of solar power analysis. Additionally, we delved into the enigmatic realm of Google Trends, where we uncovered the frequency of searches for the phrase "that is sus" – a journey akin to deciphering hieroglyphics in an ancient tomb.

Data Preprocessing and Transformation:
Upon the acquisition of this rich reservoir of data, our next endeavor resembled the intricate dance of a statistician who artfully transforms raw data into a symphony of meaningful insights. Employing a series of data preprocessing procedures that could rival the complexity of performing a magic trick, we meticulously cleaned, filtered, and standardized the data, ensuring that its integrity was as steadfast as a lighthouse guiding ships through turbulent seas. We then undertook the task of harmonizing the temporal dimensions of the two datasets, aligning the temporal granularity of solar power generation with the occurrence of "that is sus" searches. This process was as delicate as synchronizing the movements of a synchronized swimming team, aiming to achieve temporal harmony without missing a beat.

Correlation Analysis:
With our datasets primed and synchronized, we embarked on the statistical expedition of correlation analysis, seeking to unveil the degree of association between solar power generation in Cambodia and the frequency of "that is sus" Google searches. Armed with mathematical tools as precise as the instruments in a surgeon's operating room, we calculated correlation coefficients and their associated p-values, aiming to discern whether the relationship we observed was a substantive finding or a statistical illusion. Our approach to correlation analysis mirrored the delicate act of weaving a tapestry, with each statistical test serving as a thread in the intricate fabric of our investigation.

Time Series Analysis:
Recognizing that the temporal dimension of our data was as essential as the plot twists in a mystery novel, we employed time series analysis techniques to delve into the temporal dynamics of solar power generation and "that is sus" searches. Just as a watchmaker meticulously investigates the intricate mechanisms of a timepiece, we scrutinized seasonal patterns, trends, and potential lags in the relationship between these two phenomena. This phase of our analysis was akin to unraveling the temporal paradoxes of time travel, seeking to understand how the passage of time intertwined with the ebb and flow of suspicion-laden searches in the digital sphere.

Limitations and Sensitivity Analysis:
As with any scientific expedition, our methodological odyssey encountered its share of limitations and uncertainties, akin to navigating uncharted territories where maps are but faint guides. An inherent limitation lay in the observational nature of our study, recognizing that correlation does not imply causation, much like pointing out that an increased consumption of ice cream is correlated with a rise in swimming pool-related accidents without implying a causal link. To address the potential influence of confounding variables and ensure the robustness of our findings, we conducted sensitivity analyses, akin to stress-testing a bridge to confirm its structural integrity in the face of unexpected forces.

In summary, our methodological approach exuded the precision of a well-calibrated scientific instrument and the tenacity of an explorer navigating uncharted terrain, seeking to illuminate the nexus between solar power in Cambodia and the inquisitive realm of "that is sus" Google searches. This endeavor embodied the spirit of scientific inquiry, where methodological rigor harmonized with intellectual curiosity, much like a well-choreographed ballet performed on the stage of empirical investigation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Solar power generated in Cambodia and Google searches for 'that is sus'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Energy Information Administration and Google Trends .

For the time period 2004 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9740739, r-squared of 0.9488199, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Shine a Light on Solar Sus-picion: The Illuminating Link Between Solar Power in Cambodia and Google Searches for 'That is Sus'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to shed light on the curious relationship between solar power generation in Cambodia and the frequency of Google searches for the popular catchphrase "that is sus." Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our research team conducted an in-depth analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2021. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9740739 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our research suggests that as solar power generation in Cambodia increases, so does the tendency for online users to express suspicion, generating searches for "that is sus." This might just be the first documented case of solar-induced sus-picion!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The intersection of solar power and suspicious behavior may seem like an unlikely pairing, much like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole, but it is exactly this unexpected connection that has sparked our curiosity. The emergence of the catchphrase "that is sus" in popular culture, often associated with online gaming and social interactions, has piqued the interest of researchers across disciplines. However, the correlation between the solar energy industry in Cambodia and the frequency of Google searches for "that is sus" has remained a puzzling enigma, much like solving a Rubik's cube without peeling off the stickers.
Solar power represents a beacon of hope for sustainable energy, harnessing the power of the sun to illuminate our world and reduce reliance on non-renewable resources. On the other hand, the phrase "that is sus" has become a shorthand for expressing suspicion or skepticism in the digital realm, often as a playful or ironic commentary on online interactions. Uniting these two seemingly unrelated phenomena feels akin to mixing oil and water - an endeavor that presents an intellectual challenge captivating researchers with the allure of uncovering an unexpected discovery, much like stumbling upon a rare Pokémon in the tall grass.
In this study, we delve into the depths of data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, embarking on a statistical expedition to illuminate the potential link between solar power generation in Cambodia and the prevalence of suspicion-laden Google searches. Our quest is fueled by a desire to unravel this mystery and shed light on a connection that, at first glance, may seem as implausible as finding the Loch Ness Monster vacationing in the Caribbean.
As we navigate through the labyrinth of data analysis and statistical inference, we invite the reader to join us on this scientific escapade, where hypotheses are both tested and entertained, and where unexpected correlations are unearthed, much like stumbling across buried treasure during a leisurely stroll on the beach. We aim to present not only the quantitative findings but also to infuse this investigation with a sprinkle of scientific humor and intellectual delight, much like adding a dash of paprika to a meticulously crafted dish.
Without further ado, let us embark on a journey of exploration, where solar power and suspicion intersect in an unexpected dance, much like a scientific tango performed under the starry skies.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our investigation unveiled a remarkably robust correlation between solar power generation in Cambodia and the incidence of Google searches for "that is sus." The correlation coefficient of 0.9740739 indicated a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena, much like discovering a hidden pathway between two distinct scientific fields.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9488199 underscored the substantial degree to which changes in solar power generation could be associated with variations in Google searches for "that is sus." This statistical insight mirrors the precision and accuracy of a laser beam, cutting through the murkiness of seemingly unrelated data with the finesse of a seasoned detective piecing together clues.

The significance level, with a p-value of less than 0.01, provided compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and embrace the alternative, emphasizing the compelling nature of the relationship between solar power generation in Cambodia and the expression of suspicion through online searches for "that is sus." This result stands as a beacon of statistical strength, illuminating the pathway toward a deeper understanding of these interconnected phenomena.

The scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 visually encapsulates the coherence of the relationship uncovered through our analysis. The distinct clustering of data points within the scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the striking alignment between solar power generation and the frequency of searches for "that is sus," akin to witnessing a celestial alignment in the vast expanse of the night sky.

In light of these findings, it becomes increasingly clear that solar power in Cambodia not only fuels the generation of electricity but also, unexpectedly, ignites a surge in online expressions of suspicion. This unforeseen connection between harnessing the sun's energy and a collective sense of skepticism in the digital sphere may pave the way for further inquiries into the broader social and psychological implications of renewable energy adoption.

In essence, our results not only shed light on the relationship between solar power and suspicion but also offer a humorous reminder that scientific inquiry can often lead us down unexpected and enlightening paths, much like stumbling upon a punchline in the midst of a serious discussion.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Solar power generated in Cambodia and Google searches for 'that is sus'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Shine a Light on Solar Sus-picion: The Illuminating Link Between Solar Power in Cambodia and Google Searches for 'That is Sus'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to shed light on the curious relationship between solar power generation in Cambodia and the frequency of Google searches for the popular catchphrase "that is sus." Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our research team conducted an in-depth analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2021. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9740739 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our research suggests that as solar power generation in Cambodia increases, so does the tendency for online users to express suspicion, generating searches for "that is sus." This might just be the first documented case of solar-induced sus-picion!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find a link between solar power generation and environmental sustainability in developing countries. The work of Doe et al. further explores the potential of renewable energy sources to mitigate climate change impacts in Southeast Asia. Jones' research sheds light on the growing significance of solar power in Cambodia's energy landscape, emphasizing the potential for economic and environmental benefits.
Turning to the world of non-fiction books, "The Solar Revolution" by Travis Bradford presents a comprehensive overview of the solar energy industry's evolution, while "The Power of Suspicion" by John Doe delves into the psychological underpinnings of suspicion in modern society. These serious tomes offer valuable insights into our topic of inquiry, providing a solid foundation for our investigation.
As we venture into the realm of fiction, "Solaris" by Stanislaw Lem captures the intrigue of a mysterious planet that defies human understanding - a fitting parallel to our quest for understanding the enigmatic connection between solar power in Cambodia and Google searches for "that is sus." "The Da Vinci Code" by Dan Brown, although not directly related, resonates with the theme of unraveling cryptic patterns, lending an aura of intrigue to our pursuit of unconventional correlations.
In the context of animated series, "Phineas and Ferb" playfully explores the adventures of two inventive stepbrothers, often engaging in far-fetched schemes - a whimsical mirror to our endeavor to unravel the peculiar relationship between solar power and online suspicion. Additionally, "Scooby-Doo" and the gang's knack for solving mysterious phenomena offers a lighthearted analogy to our investigative approach, as we aim to demystify the unexpected connection between sustainable energy and digital skepticism.
In sum, while the initial scholarly works paint a sober picture of solar power and sustainability, we shall not shy away from infusing our exploration with a touch of humor and unconventional parallels, much like adding sprinkles of unexpected flavors to an ordinary dish.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation unveiled a remarkably robust correlation between solar power generation in Cambodia and the incidence of Google searches for "that is sus." The correlation coefficient of 0.9740739 indicated a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena, much like discovering a hidden pathway between two distinct scientific fields.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9488199 underscored the substantial degree to which changes in solar power generation could be associated with variations in Google searches for "that is sus." This statistical insight mirrors the precision and accuracy of a laser beam, cutting through the murkiness of seemingly unrelated data with the finesse of a seasoned detective piecing together clues.
The significance level, with a p-value of less than 0.01, provided compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and embrace the alternative, emphasizing the compelling nature of the relationship between solar power generation in Cambodia and the expression of suspicion through online searches for "that is sus." This result stands as a beacon of statistical strength, illuminating the pathway toward a deeper understanding of these interconnected phenomena.
The scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 visually encapsulates the coherence of the relationship uncovered through our analysis. The distinct clustering of data points within the scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the striking alignment between solar power generation and the frequency of searches for "that is sus," akin to witnessing a celestial alignment in the vast expanse of the night sky.
In light of these findings, it becomes increasingly clear that solar power in Cambodia not only fuels the generation of electricity but also, unexpectedly, ignites a surge in online expressions of suspicion. This unforeseen connection between harnessing the sun's energy and a collective sense of skepticism in the digital sphere may pave the way for further inquiries into the broader social and psychological implications of renewable energy adoption.
In essence, our results not only shed light on the relationship between solar power and suspicion but also offer a humorous reminder that scientific inquiry can often lead us down unexpected and enlightening paths, much like stumbling upon a punchline in the midst of a serious discussion.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The remarkably robust correlation between solar power generation in Cambodia and the frequency of Google searches for "that is sus" not only raises eyebrows but also sparks a myriad of scientific conundrums, akin to unraveling a cosmic mystery in the fields of solar physics and digital sociology. Our findings are congruent with prior research by Smith et al., Doe et al., and Jones, who have eloquently illuminated the positive impact of solar power on environmental sustainability and renewable energy adoption in Cambodia and other developing nations. Our results fortify these earlier works, not only by affirming the potential of solar energy as a viable resource but also by hinting at its unforeseen influence on online behavior.

The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.9740739 defies traditional scientific suspicions, much like a plot twist in a thrilling detective novel. With a p-value of less than 0.01, the evidence overwhelmingly rejects the null hypothesis, embodying a persuasive argument for the acceptance of the alternative hypothesis - that solar power generation in Cambodia and the prevalence of online suspicion are inextricably linked. These statistical indicators resonate with the certainty of a scientific law, reminiscent of the fundamental principles that govern the natural world.

The r-squared value of 0.9488199 underscores the close association between changes in solar power generation and fluctuations in Google searches for "that is sus," akin to a detective skillfully connecting a trail of clues to crack a compelling case. The scatterplot in Figure 1 visually encapsulates the coherence of this relationship, portraying a narrative that is not only compelling but also evocative of the interconnectedness between two ostensibly unrelated phenomena, akin to unraveling an intricate web of scientific curiosity.

While our investigation delved into the quirky interplay between solar power and online skepticism, it is crucial to recognize the broader implications of our findings. It prompts contemplation on how innovations in sustainable energy may influence societal discourse and digital interactions, offering a lighthearted reminder that scientific inquiry can yield unexpected and illuminating discoveries. In essence, this research sheds light on the comedic potential of scientific exploration, demonstrating that even the sunniest of subjects can lead to unexpected and whimsical revelations.

Moving forward, future studies could delve into the mechanisms underlying this correlation, delving into the psychology of online behavior and the social dynamics of suspicion in the digital age. As such, our research not only contributes to the burgeoning field of renewable energy studies but also imparts a playful reminder that scientific inquiry has the capacity to amuse and intrigue, much like an engagingly clever pun nestled within the unfolding narrative of academic discourse.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Solar power generated in Cambodia and Google searches for 'that is sus'. Make lots of jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Shine a Light on Solar Sus-picion: The Illuminating Link Between Solar Power in Cambodia and Google Searches for 'That is Sus'

[[ABSTRACT]]
This paper aims to shed light on the curious relationship between solar power generation in Cambodia and the frequency of Google searches for the popular catchphrase "that is sus." Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our research team conducted an in-depth analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2021. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9740739 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our research suggests that as solar power generation in Cambodia increases, so does the tendency for online users to express suspicion, generating searches for "that is sus." This might just be the first documented case of solar-induced sus-picion!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The intersection of solar power and suspicious behavior may seem like an unlikely pairing, much like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole, but it is exactly this unexpected connection that has sparked our curiosity. The emergence of the catchphrase "that is sus" in popular culture, often associated with online gaming and social interactions, has piqued the interest of researchers across disciplines. However, the correlation between the solar energy industry in Cambodia and the frequency of Google searches for "that is sus" has remained a puzzling enigma, much like solving a Rubik's cube without peeling off the stickers.
Solar power represents a beacon of hope for sustainable energy, harnessing the power of the sun to illuminate our world and reduce reliance on non-renewable resources. On the other hand, the phrase "that is sus" has become a shorthand for expressing suspicion or skepticism in the digital realm, often as a playful or ironic commentary on online interactions. Uniting these two seemingly unrelated phenomena feels akin to mixing oil and water - an endeavor that presents an intellectual challenge captivating researchers with the allure of uncovering an unexpected discovery, much like stumbling upon a rare Pokémon in the tall grass.
In this study, we delve into the depths of data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, embarking on a statistical expedition to illuminate the potential link between solar power generation in Cambodia and the prevalence of suspicion-laden Google searches. Our quest is fueled by a desire to unravel this mystery and shed light on a connection that, at first glance, may seem as implausible as finding the Loch Ness Monster vacationing in the Caribbean.
As we navigate through the labyrinth of data analysis and statistical inference, we invite the reader to join us on this scientific escapade, where hypotheses are both tested and entertained, and where unexpected correlations are unearthed, much like stumbling across buried treasure during a leisurely stroll on the beach. We aim to present not only the quantitative findings but also to infuse this investigation with a sprinkle of scientific humor and intellectual delight, much like adding a dash of paprika to a meticulously crafted dish.
Without further ado, let us embark on a journey of exploration, where solar power and suspicion intersect in an unexpected dance, much like a scientific tango performed under the starry skies.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our investigation unveiled a remarkably robust correlation between solar power generation in Cambodia and the incidence of Google searches for "that is sus." The correlation coefficient of 0.9740739 indicated a strong positive relationship between these seemingly disparate phenomena, much like discovering a hidden pathway between two distinct scientific fields.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.9488199 underscored the substantial degree to which changes in solar power generation could be associated with variations in Google searches for "that is sus." This statistical insight mirrors the precision and accuracy of a laser beam, cutting through the murkiness of seemingly unrelated data with the finesse of a seasoned detective piecing together clues.
The significance level, with a p-value of less than 0.01, provided compelling evidence to reject the null hypothesis and embrace the alternative, emphasizing the compelling nature of the relationship between solar power generation in Cambodia and the expression of suspicion through online searches for "that is sus." This result stands as a beacon of statistical strength, illuminating the pathway toward a deeper understanding of these interconnected phenomena.
The scatterplot depicted in Figure 1 visually encapsulates the coherence of the relationship uncovered through our analysis. The distinct clustering of data points within the scatterplot serves as a visual testament to the striking alignment between solar power generation and the frequency of searches for "that is sus," akin to witnessing a celestial alignment in the vast expanse of the night sky.
In light of these findings, it becomes increasingly clear that solar power in Cambodia not only fuels the generation of electricity but also, unexpectedly, ignites a surge in online expressions of suspicion. This unforeseen connection between harnessing the sun's energy and a collective sense of skepticism in the digital sphere may pave the way for further inquiries into the broader social and psychological implications of renewable energy adoption.
In essence, our results not only shed light on the relationship between solar power and suspicion but also offer a humorous reminder that scientific inquiry can often lead us down unexpected and enlightening paths, much like stumbling upon a punchline in the midst of a serious discussion.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has brought to light a startling connection between the radiance of solar power in Cambodia and the burgeoning skepticism lurking in the depths of online searches for "that is sus." The compelling correlation coefficient and p-value have left us both dazzled and amused, much like witnessing a glittering disco ball reflecting the unexpected interplay between renewable energy and digital suspicion.

The robustness of our findings is akin to stumbling upon a rare gemstone while sifting through statistical data, reminding us that scientific inquiry is not merely a linear path but rather an exhilarating rollercoaster ride of discovery and delight. The unexpected pairing of solar power and suspicion has injected a touch of whimsy into the realm of renewable energy research, much like discovering a unicorn grazing in a field of sunflowers.

Our exploration has illuminated the potential for solar energy to not only power homes but also to spark a surge in online skepticism, serving as a quirky reminder that the interconnected web of human behavior never fails to surprise, much like finding a winning lottery ticket tucked within the pages of a dry academic journal.

With our findings in tow, we assert that no further research is needed in this area, as we have truly reached the zenith of scientific hilarity and enlightenment through this delightful investigation of solar sus-picions.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Shine a Light on Solar Sus-picion: The Illuminating Link Between Solar Power in Cambodia and Google Searches for 'That is Sus'. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Global Energy Innovation and Socio-Digital Trends


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Shine a Light on Solar Sus-picion: The Illuminating Link Between Solar Power in Cambodia and Google Searches for 'That is Sus'. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Foundation for Renewable Energy Research and Investigation (FRERI)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Shine a Light on Solar Sus-picion: The Illuminating Link Between Solar Power in Cambodia and Google Searches for 'That is Sus' with an abstract of This paper aims to shed light on the curious relationship between solar power generation in Cambodia and the frequency of Google searches for the popular catchphrase "that is sus." Utilizing data from the Energy Information Administration and Google Trends, our research team conducted an in-depth analysis covering the period from 2004 to 2021. The findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.9740739 and a p-value less than 0.01. Our research suggests that as solar power generation in Cambodia increases, so does the tendency for online users to express suspicion, generating searches for "that is sus." This might just be the first documented case of solar-induced sus-picion!

ChatGPT:

Cambodia, solar power, Google searches, "that is sus", correlation, solar power generation, online users, suspicion, Google Trends, Energy Information Administration, research, solar-induced suspicion

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Solar power generated in Cambodia
Detailed data title: Total solar power generated in Cambodia in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Solar power generated in Cambodia

Google searches for 'that is sus'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'that is sus' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'that is sus'

Correlation r = 0.9740739 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9488199 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 94.9% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Google searches for 'that is sus') is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Solar power generated in Cambodia) over the 18 years from 2004 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 9.5E-12. 0.0000000000094628639771630730
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 9.5E-10% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 105,676,252,180 random variables You don't actually need 105 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 17 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 17 because we have two variables measured over a period of 18 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.93, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
Solar power generated in Cambodia (Billion kWh)0.0010.0010.0020.0020.0020.0020.0030.0030.0070.0090.0130.0180.0270.0330.0430.120.3060.37332
Google searches for 'that is sus' (Rel. search volume)3.833337.083338.666673.833331.333336.416675.583336.9166710.2510.08338.666678.6666711.083312.515.416714.416740.833358.1667




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Confounding variable: 2020 is particularly different from the other years on this graph. Confounding variables (like global pandemics) will cause two variables to look connected when in fact a "sneaky third" variable is influencing both of them behind the scenes.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.001,0.001,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.002,0.003,0.003,0.007,0.009,0.013,0.018,0.027,0.033,0.043,0.12,0.306,0.37332,])
array_2 = np.array([3.83333,7.08333,8.66667,3.83333,1.33333,6.41667,5.58333,6.91667,10.25,10.0833,8.66667,8.66667,11.0833,12.5,15.4167,14.4167,40.8333,58.1667,])
array_1_name = "Solar power generated in Cambodia"
array_2_name = "Google searches for 'that is sus'"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Cheers to you for rating this correlation!


Correlation ID: 2619 · Black Variable ID: 23570 · Red Variable ID: 1367
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0