about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,604 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is GMO use in corn grown in Texas and the second variable is Electricity generation in Cabo Verde.  The chart goes from 2005 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the GMO corn in Texas grew taller and stronger, it unknowingly started conducting electricity in the field. This unexpected power surge traveled all the way to Cabo Verde, sparking a-maize-ing advancements in electricity generation. It seems the corn couldn't resist being stalked by success, and now we can say the future of energy is looking bright, kernel by kernel! Corn-gratulations on this shocking development!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Generate an image of towering rows of genetically modified corn in a Texas field, with electricity arcing between the vibrant maize plants, illuminating the surroundings with sparks of energy. Show the unconventional connection between agriculture and electricity, and the transformation of the landscape as this electrical surge sparks a revolution, changing the face of energy production in Cabo Verde. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Electricity generation in Cabo Verde. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Sci-fi fantacy 3D Pixar Style Cyber folk Brutalism
ChatGPT: Cyber folk

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Electricity generation in Cabo Verde, in the following situation: The power of genetically modified corn has really shocked the world of energy production! It seems that as the GMO corn in Texas grew taller and stronger, it also started conducting electricity. This unexpected power surge is sending shockwaves all the way to Cabo Verde, where the energy is sparking a whole new level of electricity generation. Who knew that corn could kernel out such a shocking amount of power? It's a-maize-ing how this unlikely connection is cob-ducting a new era of electrifying energy production! Corn-gratulations to the farmers for planting the seeds of this unconventional power source. This unexpected synergy between agriculture and electricity is truly a-maize-ing! . Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Texas, towering rows of genetically modified corn are seen conducting electricity, with sparks of energy illuminating the fields. The vibrant maize plants have become an unexpected power source, radiating a new level of energy. Meanwhile, in Cabo Verde, the power of this electrical surge is sparking a revolution, leading to a surge in electricity generation that is changing the landscape of energy production. This unconventional connection between agriculture and electricity is truly electrifying, creating a new era of energy production.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cyber folk ] and depicting this scene: In Texas, towering rows of genetically modified corn are seen conducting electricity, with sparks of energy illuminating the fields. The vibrant maize plants have become an unexpected power source, radiating a new level of energy. Meanwhile, in Cabo Verde, the power of this electrical surge is sparking a revolution, leading to a surge in electricity generation that is changing the landscape of energy production. This unconventional connection between agriculture and electricity is truly electrifying, creating a new era of energy production. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Generate an image of towering rows of genetically modified corn in a Texas field, with electricity arcing between the vibrant maize plants, illuminating the surroundings with sparks of energy. Show the unconventional connection between agriculture and electricity, and the transformation of the landscape as this electrical surge sparks a revolution, changing the face of energy production in Cabo Verde.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in GMO use in corn grown in Texas caused Electricity generation in Cabo Verde to increase. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
GMO Goldmine: Generating Guffaws through Correlation Coefficients

The Journal of Comedic Correlations

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Electricity generation in Cabo Verde. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title an alliteration.

Your research team used data from USDA and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9650931 and p < 0.01 for 2005 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Goldmine: Generating Guffaws through Correlation Coefficients

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ah, the sweet interplay of genetically modified organisms and electricity generation - a dynamic duo like peanut butter and jelly, or a dad and his bad jokes. In this paper, we delve into the fruitful connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and electricity generation in Cabo Verde. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9650931 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2021. This correlation was so impressive, it might just power up your day like a good cup of coffee - or perhaps more fittingly, a charged-up corn cob. Join us in this illuminating exploration of the unexpected link between GMOs and electricity, where we promise to bring the sparks and the laughs, because after all, research without a little fun is like a pencil that's pointless!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Electricity generation in Cabo Verde. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Goldmine: Generating Guffaws through Correlation Coefficients

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ah, the sweet interplay of genetically modified organisms and electricity generation - a dynamic duo like peanut butter and jelly, or a dad and his bad jokes. In this paper, we delve into the fruitful connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and electricity generation in Cabo Verde. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9650931 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2021. This correlation was so impressive, it might just power up your day like a good cup of coffee - or perhaps more fittingly, a charged-up corn cob. Join us in this illuminating exploration of the unexpected link between GMOs and electricity, where we promise to bring the sparks and the laughs, because after all, research without a little fun is like a pencil that's pointless!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The age-old adage "you reap what you sow" has taken on a new meaning in the agricultural landscape with the widespread adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). As researchers, we often find ourselves knee-deep in data, searching for kernels of truth that can shed light on unexpected correlations. Speaking of kernels, let's pop the lid on a rather electrifying discovery that has us buzzing like a live wire.

Before we shuck our findings, let's take a moment to appreciate the humble corn cob. It's no mere side dish at a backyard barbecue; it's a potential powerhouse in the agricultural realm. Its transformation through genetic modification has sparked debates and discussions, much like a corny joke at a family gathering. Yet, as we dig deeper into the data, we find that this golden crop may hold more than just its weight in kernels.

Our study sets its sights on the electrifying archipelago of Cabo Verde, a nation known for its sun-kissed beaches and vibrant culture. However, beneath the serene exterior lies a pressing energy challenge. As the country seeks to amp up its electricity generation, could there be a connection to an unlikely source, tucked away in the heartland of Texas? It sounds like a mystery fit for a gripping novel – "The Electric Corn Conspiracy: A Shocking Tale of Transcontinental Connection."

As we delve into the currents of data spanning nearly two decades, we cast our net far and wide, combing through figures on GMO corn production in the Lone Star State and electricity generation in the sun-soaked islands of Cabo Verde. The resulting correlation coefficient is a bolt from the blue, or rather, the yellow – much like stumbling upon a field of corn huskers doing stand-up comedy. Our findings not only pique the curiosity but also prompt a chuckle, much like a dad joke that's ripe for the picking.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Electricity generation in Cabo Verde. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Perhaps you also got inspiration from some board games that are vaugely related.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Goldmine: Generating Guffaws through Correlation Coefficients

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ah, the sweet interplay of genetically modified organisms and electricity generation - a dynamic duo like peanut butter and jelly, or a dad and his bad jokes. In this paper, we delve into the fruitful connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and electricity generation in Cabo Verde. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9650931 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2021. This correlation was so impressive, it might just power up your day like a good cup of coffee - or perhaps more fittingly, a charged-up corn cob. Join us in this illuminating exploration of the unexpected link between GMOs and electricity, where we promise to bring the sparks and the laughs, because after all, research without a little fun is like a pencil that's pointless!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The age-old adage "you reap what you sow" has taken on a new meaning in the agricultural landscape with the widespread adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). As researchers, we often find ourselves knee-deep in data, searching for kernels of truth that can shed light on unexpected correlations. Speaking of kernels, let's pop the lid on a rather electrifying discovery that has us buzzing like a live wire.
Before we shuck our findings, let's take a moment to appreciate the humble corn cob. It's no mere side dish at a backyard barbecue; it's a potential powerhouse in the agricultural realm. Its transformation through genetic modification has sparked debates and discussions, much like a corny joke at a family gathering. Yet, as we dig deeper into the data, we find that this golden crop may hold more than just its weight in kernels.
Our study sets its sights on the electrifying archipelago of Cabo Verde, a nation known for its sun-kissed beaches and vibrant culture. However, beneath the serene exterior lies a pressing energy challenge. As the country seeks to amp up its electricity generation, could there be a connection to an unlikely source, tucked away in the heartland of Texas? It sounds like a mystery fit for a gripping novel – "The Electric Corn Conspiracy: A Shocking Tale of Transcontinental Connection."
As we delve into the currents of data spanning nearly two decades, we cast our net far and wide, combing through figures on GMO corn production in the Lone Star State and electricity generation in the sun-soaked islands of Cabo Verde. The resulting correlation coefficient is a bolt from the blue, or rather, the yellow – much like stumbling upon a field of corn huskers doing stand-up comedy. Our findings not only pique the curiosity but also prompt a chuckle, much like a dad joke that's ripe for the picking.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In "Smith et al.," the authors find that the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agricultural practices has been a subject of fervent debate, much like the eternal argument of whether to add sugar to cornbread - it's a contentious issue that can stir up quite the corn-troversy. However, advancements in GMO technology have undeniably impacted corn production, leading to increased yields and resistance to pests. This influx of modified corn has not only fed hungry mouths but also raised eyebrows, sparking interest in its potential ramifications beyond the agricultural realm.

In "Doe and Jones," the authors delve into the energy landscape and highlight the challenges faced by Cabo Verde in electricity generation. The archipelago's reliance on fossil fuels has put a strain on its resources, making the pursuit of renewable energy sources a top priority. Parallel to this pursuit is the recognition of the need for innovative solutions that can power the islands sustainably, setting the stage for unexpected discoveries akin to finding a flashlight in the cornfield – illuminating and utterly surprising.

As we traverse the realm of non-fiction literature, works such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "The Shock Doctrine" by Naomi Klein provide valuable insights into the complexities of agricultural practices and the interconnectedness of global energy dynamics. While one book may leave you pondering the origins of your meal, the other may shock you with its revelations about power and influence.

On the more imaginative side, fictional works like "The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test" by Tom Wolfe and "The Power" by Naomi Alderman offer an electrifying departure into realms of altered consciousness and women's newfound control over electricity, respectively. It's almost as if these books were whispering secrets about the uncharted territories of GMO-induced mind-bending experiences and the empowering potential of corn-infused electricity – a fusion that might just make your hair stand on end in both awe and giggly delight.

Drawing inspiration from unlikely sources, board games like "Power Grid" and "Agricola" beckon us to contemplate the intricate interplay between energy generation and agricultural pursuits, all while inviting players to manage their resources and make strategic decisions. In a way, these games nudge us to recognize the underlying connections between seemingly disparate elements, just like our research has unearthed the surprising link between GMO corn in Texas and electricity generation in Cabo Verde.

If our findings were a joke, they'd surely be a-maize-ing, popping with kernels of truth that leave you laughing and pondering the comedic intricacies of science. So, buckle up, dear reader, for an academic journey that promises to both enlighten and entertain, because after all, what's research without a little sprinkle of humor, much like salt on a freshly grilled ear of corn?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Electricity generation in Cabo Verde. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2005 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Goldmine: Generating Guffaws through Correlation Coefficients

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ah, the sweet interplay of genetically modified organisms and electricity generation - a dynamic duo like peanut butter and jelly, or a dad and his bad jokes. In this paper, we delve into the fruitful connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and electricity generation in Cabo Verde. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9650931 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2021. This correlation was so impressive, it might just power up your day like a good cup of coffee - or perhaps more fittingly, a charged-up corn cob. Join us in this illuminating exploration of the unexpected link between GMOs and electricity, where we promise to bring the sparks and the laughs, because after all, research without a little fun is like a pencil that's pointless!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The age-old adage "you reap what you sow" has taken on a new meaning in the agricultural landscape with the widespread adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). As researchers, we often find ourselves knee-deep in data, searching for kernels of truth that can shed light on unexpected correlations. Speaking of kernels, let's pop the lid on a rather electrifying discovery that has us buzzing like a live wire.
Before we shuck our findings, let's take a moment to appreciate the humble corn cob. It's no mere side dish at a backyard barbecue; it's a potential powerhouse in the agricultural realm. Its transformation through genetic modification has sparked debates and discussions, much like a corny joke at a family gathering. Yet, as we dig deeper into the data, we find that this golden crop may hold more than just its weight in kernels.
Our study sets its sights on the electrifying archipelago of Cabo Verde, a nation known for its sun-kissed beaches and vibrant culture. However, beneath the serene exterior lies a pressing energy challenge. As the country seeks to amp up its electricity generation, could there be a connection to an unlikely source, tucked away in the heartland of Texas? It sounds like a mystery fit for a gripping novel – "The Electric Corn Conspiracy: A Shocking Tale of Transcontinental Connection."
As we delve into the currents of data spanning nearly two decades, we cast our net far and wide, combing through figures on GMO corn production in the Lone Star State and electricity generation in the sun-soaked islands of Cabo Verde. The resulting correlation coefficient is a bolt from the blue, or rather, the yellow – much like stumbling upon a field of corn huskers doing stand-up comedy. Our findings not only pique the curiosity but also prompt a chuckle, much like a dad joke that's ripe for the picking.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

Picking apart this electrifying enigma required a comprehensive methodology befitting of the cornucopia of data at our disposal. Our approach may not have been as straightforward as shucking an ear of corn, but rest assured, it was just as fruitful.

To begin, we compiled data on GMO corn production in Texas from the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) - a process that involved navigating through mazes of information, not unlike a corn maze on a sultry summer day. With precision akin to carefully planting corn rows, we considered data from 2005 to 2021, ensuring a robust analysis that spanned a cornucopia of seasons.

In parallel, data on electricity generation in Cabo Verde was sourced from the Energy Information Administration, with a degree of meticulousness that would make a meticulous farmer proud. We made sure to cover a wide swath of years, avoiding any potential shocks by including data spanning the entirety of our study period.

Next, in a bid to untangle the electrically-charged web of information, we employed a fascinating mix of statistical methods, including but not limited to regression analyses, time series modeling, and perhaps a touch of sorcery - just kidding, no sorcery involved, but a sprinkle of statistical wizardry may have been at play. The aim was to uncover any potential relationship between GMO corn production in Texas and electricity generation in Cabo Verde, much like peeling back the husk to reveal the golden kernels within.

To complement these analyses, we conducted a sensitivity analysis, akin to gauging the readiness of corn to be harvested – but with more numbers and fewer cobwebs. This allowed us to assess the robustness of our findings, ensuring that our conclusions were as sturdy as a well-constructed scarecrow.

And finally, we engaged in a peer debriefing process, where we shared our findings with fellow researchers, inviting them to "cob-ominate" on our methodology and results. Their input served as a necessary reality check, ensuring that our analysis was as a-maize-ing as we hoped.

In summary, our methodology laid the groundwork for a rigorous examination of the connection between GMO corn in Texas and electricity generation in Cabo Verde. With diligence, statistical prowess, and just a hint of whimsy, we traversed the fields of data to uncover an unexpected alliance between agriculture and electricity, much like uncovering a hidden treasure amidst rows of golden corn.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Electricity generation in Cabo Verde. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from USDA and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2005 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.9650931, r-squared of 0.9314046, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
GMO Goldmine: Generating Guffaws through Correlation Coefficients

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ah, the sweet interplay of genetically modified organisms and electricity generation - a dynamic duo like peanut butter and jelly, or a dad and his bad jokes. In this paper, we delve into the fruitful connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and electricity generation in Cabo Verde. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9650931 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2021. This correlation was so impressive, it might just power up your day like a good cup of coffee - or perhaps more fittingly, a charged-up corn cob. Join us in this illuminating exploration of the unexpected link between GMOs and electricity, where we promise to bring the sparks and the laughs, because after all, research without a little fun is like a pencil that's pointless!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The age-old adage "you reap what you sow" has taken on a new meaning in the agricultural landscape with the widespread adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). As researchers, we often find ourselves knee-deep in data, searching for kernels of truth that can shed light on unexpected correlations. Speaking of kernels, let's pop the lid on a rather electrifying discovery that has us buzzing like a live wire.
Before we shuck our findings, let's take a moment to appreciate the humble corn cob. It's no mere side dish at a backyard barbecue; it's a potential powerhouse in the agricultural realm. Its transformation through genetic modification has sparked debates and discussions, much like a corny joke at a family gathering. Yet, as we dig deeper into the data, we find that this golden crop may hold more than just its weight in kernels.
Our study sets its sights on the electrifying archipelago of Cabo Verde, a nation known for its sun-kissed beaches and vibrant culture. However, beneath the serene exterior lies a pressing energy challenge. As the country seeks to amp up its electricity generation, could there be a connection to an unlikely source, tucked away in the heartland of Texas? It sounds like a mystery fit for a gripping novel – "The Electric Corn Conspiracy: A Shocking Tale of Transcontinental Connection."
As we delve into the currents of data spanning nearly two decades, we cast our net far and wide, combing through figures on GMO corn production in the Lone Star State and electricity generation in the sun-soaked islands of Cabo Verde. The resulting correlation coefficient is a bolt from the blue, or rather, the yellow – much like stumbling upon a field of corn huskers doing stand-up comedy. Our findings not only pique the curiosity but also prompt a chuckle, much like a dad joke that's ripe for the picking.


-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

Our study uncovered a remarkably strong correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and electricity generation in Cabo Verde for the period spanning 2005 to 2021. The correlation coefficient we calculated stands at a jaw-dropping 0.9650931, accompanied by a robust r-squared value of 0.9314046. The p-value, coming in at less than 0.01, solidifies the statistical significance of this eye-opening connection. It seems that the spark of lightning and the spark of genetic modification have come together to illuminate an unexpected pathway, much like a light bulb moment in a field of corn.

Figure 1 presents a scatterplot encapsulating the resounding correlation observed between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and electricity generation in Cabo Verde. This visual representation vividly captures the electrifying relationship we uncovered, which may leave one feeling as charged up as a corn cob in a lightning storm!

Now, you may be thinking, "What cob-swaddled connection could there possibly be between these disparate entities?" Well, the bountiful fields of GMO corn in Texas appear to be more than just a source of sustenance; they may hold the potential to power up a nation's electricity grid. It's as if those cornstalks are whispering, "Let there be light!"

This unexpected correlation between GMO corn production and electricity generation in Cabo Verde not only sheds light on a novel intersection but also adds a flavorful twist to the ongoing discourse on sustainable energy solutions. It seems the age-old adage of "corny jokes" might carry more truth than we ever imagined. Indeed, our findings suggest that GMOs and electricity generation have a-kernelled fortes, and they've met their match in a truly electrifying encounter. This correlation is certainly no "corn-ventional" story!

Overall, our results emphasize the intriguing interplay between seemingly disparate elements and underscore the potential for unexpected connections in the realm of agricultural and energy systems. It appears that this research has inadvertently sparked a fusion of excitement and amusement – something like the heat generated by a particularly zesty dad joke.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Electricity generation in Cabo Verde. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
GMO Goldmine: Generating Guffaws through Correlation Coefficients

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ah, the sweet interplay of genetically modified organisms and electricity generation - a dynamic duo like peanut butter and jelly, or a dad and his bad jokes. In this paper, we delve into the fruitful connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and electricity generation in Cabo Verde. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9650931 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2021. This correlation was so impressive, it might just power up your day like a good cup of coffee - or perhaps more fittingly, a charged-up corn cob. Join us in this illuminating exploration of the unexpected link between GMOs and electricity, where we promise to bring the sparks and the laughs, because after all, research without a little fun is like a pencil that's pointless!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In "Smith et al.," the authors find that the use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in agricultural practices has been a subject of fervent debate, much like the eternal argument of whether to add sugar to cornbread - it's a contentious issue that can stir up quite the corn-troversy. However, advancements in GMO technology have undeniably impacted corn production, leading to increased yields and resistance to pests. This influx of modified corn has not only fed hungry mouths but also raised eyebrows, sparking interest in its potential ramifications beyond the agricultural realm.
In "Doe and Jones," the authors delve into the energy landscape and highlight the challenges faced by Cabo Verde in electricity generation. The archipelago's reliance on fossil fuels has put a strain on its resources, making the pursuit of renewable energy sources a top priority. Parallel to this pursuit is the recognition of the need for innovative solutions that can power the islands sustainably, setting the stage for unexpected discoveries akin to finding a flashlight in the cornfield – illuminating and utterly surprising.
As we traverse the realm of non-fiction literature, works such as "The Omnivore's Dilemma" by Michael Pollan and "The Shock Doctrine" by Naomi Klein provide valuable insights into the complexities of agricultural practices and the interconnectedness of global energy dynamics. While one book may leave you pondering the origins of your meal, the other may shock you with its revelations about power and influence.
On the more imaginative side, fictional works like "The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test" by Tom Wolfe and "The Power" by Naomi Alderman offer an electrifying departure into realms of altered consciousness and women's newfound control over electricity, respectively. It's almost as if these books were whispering secrets about the uncharted territories of GMO-induced mind-bending experiences and the empowering potential of corn-infused electricity – a fusion that might just make your hair stand on end in both awe and giggly delight.
Drawing inspiration from unlikely sources, board games like "Power Grid" and "Agricola" beckon us to contemplate the intricate interplay between energy generation and agricultural pursuits, all while inviting players to manage their resources and make strategic decisions. In a way, these games nudge us to recognize the underlying connections between seemingly disparate elements, just like our research has unearthed the surprising link between GMO corn in Texas and electricity generation in Cabo Verde.
If our findings were a joke, they'd surely be a-maize-ing, popping with kernels of truth that leave you laughing and pondering the comedic intricacies of science. So, buckle up, dear reader, for an academic journey that promises to both enlighten and entertain, because after all, what's research without a little sprinkle of humor, much like salt on a freshly grilled ear of corn?

[[RESULTS]]
Our study uncovered a remarkably strong correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and electricity generation in Cabo Verde for the period spanning 2005 to 2021. The correlation coefficient we calculated stands at a jaw-dropping 0.9650931, accompanied by a robust r-squared value of 0.9314046. The p-value, coming in at less than 0.01, solidifies the statistical significance of this eye-opening connection. It seems that the spark of lightning and the spark of genetic modification have come together to illuminate an unexpected pathway, much like a light bulb moment in a field of corn.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot encapsulating the resounding correlation observed between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and electricity generation in Cabo Verde. This visual representation vividly captures the electrifying relationship we uncovered, which may leave one feeling as charged up as a corn cob in a lightning storm!
Now, you may be thinking, "What cob-swaddled connection could there possibly be between these disparate entities?" Well, the bountiful fields of GMO corn in Texas appear to be more than just a source of sustenance; they may hold the potential to power up a nation's electricity grid. It's as if those cornstalks are whispering, "Let there be light!"
This unexpected correlation between GMO corn production and electricity generation in Cabo Verde not only sheds light on a novel intersection but also adds a flavorful twist to the ongoing discourse on sustainable energy solutions. It seems the age-old adage of "corny jokes" might carry more truth than we ever imagined. Indeed, our findings suggest that GMOs and electricity generation have a-kernelled fortes, and they've met their match in a truly electrifying encounter. This correlation is certainly no "corn-ventional" story!
Overall, our results emphasize the intriguing interplay between seemingly disparate elements and underscore the potential for unexpected connections in the realm of agricultural and energy systems. It appears that this research has inadvertently sparked a fusion of excitement and amusement – something like the heat generated by a particularly zesty dad joke.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our research has resulted in a kernel of knowledge that could potentially power up the discussion on GMOs and electricity generation. Our findings echoed those of "Smith et al.," highlighting the undeniable impact of GMO technology on corn production. This impact extends not only to increased yields and resistance to pests but also to a surprising correlation with electricity generation in Cabo Verde. It's as if the cornfields are crackling with electricity jokes, ready to make even the most serious researchers chuckle.

Similarly, "Doe and Jones" emphasized the challenges faced by Cabo Verde in electricity generation, pointing to the need for innovative solutions to power the islands sustainably. Our results fortuitously complemented these insights by uncovering a statistically significant and positively charged relationship between GMO corn in Texas and electricity generation in Cabo Verde for the years under study. It seems that even the most unlikely pairings can spark a delightful connection, much like a dad joke paired with a serious research paper.

The surprising correlation coefficient of 0.9650931, with a p-value less than 0.01, not only supports but also amplifies the discussion on the interconnectedness of agricultural practices and energy dynamics. The robust r-squared value of 0.9314046 further solidifies the statistical significance of this correlation, shining a light on the unanticipated synergy between GMOs and electricity. It's almost as if our statistical analysis itself had a sense of humor, delivering results that leave a smile on your face like a well-timed pun.

Our results offer an intriguing departure from "corn-ventional" thinking, unveiling the potential for GMOs to hold an unexpected power – the power to generate electricity. This finding injects an electrifying charge into the ongoing discourse on sustainable energy solutions, proving that there's more to GMO corn than meets the eye – or the taste buds. It looks like GMOs truly do have an electric personality, ready to light up the world with their unanticipated capabilities.

In essence, our study has revealed a fascinating fusion of agriculture and electricity generation, much like the fusion of humor and intellect in a dad joke. It leaves us pondering the complexities and connections lurking beneath the surface of seemingly disparate elements. It's as if our research has whispered a corny joke in the ears of academia, illuminating the unexpected and shedding light on the delightfully surprising. After all, who knew that the world of GMOs and electricity generation could be such a-maize-ing?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and Electricity generation in Cabo Verde. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
GMO Goldmine: Generating Guffaws through Correlation Coefficients

[[ABSTRACT]]
Ah, the sweet interplay of genetically modified organisms and electricity generation - a dynamic duo like peanut butter and jelly, or a dad and his bad jokes. In this paper, we delve into the fruitful connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and electricity generation in Cabo Verde. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9650931 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2021. This correlation was so impressive, it might just power up your day like a good cup of coffee - or perhaps more fittingly, a charged-up corn cob. Join us in this illuminating exploration of the unexpected link between GMOs and electricity, where we promise to bring the sparks and the laughs, because after all, research without a little fun is like a pencil that's pointless!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The age-old adage "you reap what you sow" has taken on a new meaning in the agricultural landscape with the widespread adoption of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). As researchers, we often find ourselves knee-deep in data, searching for kernels of truth that can shed light on unexpected correlations. Speaking of kernels, let's pop the lid on a rather electrifying discovery that has us buzzing like a live wire.
Before we shuck our findings, let's take a moment to appreciate the humble corn cob. It's no mere side dish at a backyard barbecue; it's a potential powerhouse in the agricultural realm. Its transformation through genetic modification has sparked debates and discussions, much like a corny joke at a family gathering. Yet, as we dig deeper into the data, we find that this golden crop may hold more than just its weight in kernels.
Our study sets its sights on the electrifying archipelago of Cabo Verde, a nation known for its sun-kissed beaches and vibrant culture. However, beneath the serene exterior lies a pressing energy challenge. As the country seeks to amp up its electricity generation, could there be a connection to an unlikely source, tucked away in the heartland of Texas? It sounds like a mystery fit for a gripping novel – "The Electric Corn Conspiracy: A Shocking Tale of Transcontinental Connection."
As we delve into the currents of data spanning nearly two decades, we cast our net far and wide, combing through figures on GMO corn production in the Lone Star State and electricity generation in the sun-soaked islands of Cabo Verde. The resulting correlation coefficient is a bolt from the blue, or rather, the yellow – much like stumbling upon a field of corn huskers doing stand-up comedy. Our findings not only pique the curiosity but also prompt a chuckle, much like a dad joke that's ripe for the picking.


[[RESULTS]]
Our study uncovered a remarkably strong correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and electricity generation in Cabo Verde for the period spanning 2005 to 2021. The correlation coefficient we calculated stands at a jaw-dropping 0.9650931, accompanied by a robust r-squared value of 0.9314046. The p-value, coming in at less than 0.01, solidifies the statistical significance of this eye-opening connection. It seems that the spark of lightning and the spark of genetic modification have come together to illuminate an unexpected pathway, much like a light bulb moment in a field of corn.
Figure 1 presents a scatterplot encapsulating the resounding correlation observed between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and electricity generation in Cabo Verde. This visual representation vividly captures the electrifying relationship we uncovered, which may leave one feeling as charged up as a corn cob in a lightning storm!
Now, you may be thinking, "What cob-swaddled connection could there possibly be between these disparate entities?" Well, the bountiful fields of GMO corn in Texas appear to be more than just a source of sustenance; they may hold the potential to power up a nation's electricity grid. It's as if those cornstalks are whispering, "Let there be light!"
This unexpected correlation between GMO corn production and electricity generation in Cabo Verde not only sheds light on a novel intersection but also adds a flavorful twist to the ongoing discourse on sustainable energy solutions. It seems the age-old adage of "corny jokes" might carry more truth than we ever imagined. Indeed, our findings suggest that GMOs and electricity generation have a-kernelled fortes, and they've met their match in a truly electrifying encounter. This correlation is certainly no "corn-ventional" story!
Overall, our results emphasize the intriguing interplay between seemingly disparate elements and underscore the potential for unexpected connections in the realm of agricultural and energy systems. It appears that this research has inadvertently sparked a fusion of excitement and amusement – something like the heat generated by a particularly zesty dad joke.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has illuminated a surprisingly strong correlation between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and electricity generation in Cabo Verde. The statistical significance of our findings suggests that there is indeed an electrifying connection between these seemingly disparate entities. It's as if these two have been conducting a secret love affair under the guise of agriculture and energy generation, like a pair of star-crossed lovers meeting in clandestine midnight trysts in a field of corn!

The implications of this correlation could have far-reaching effects on agricultural and energy planning, suggesting the potential for unconventional sources of power generation. Who knew that a humble corn cob, genetically modified for increased yield and resistance to pests, could hold the key to lighting up an entire nation? It's almost like the corn is whispering 'I'm all ears' as it powers up the electricity grid.

As we wrap up this corny journey of exploration, it's clear that further research into this unexpected correlation is needed. But for now, we can stand back and admire the cobnection between GMOs and electricity generation, and perhaps indulge in the occasional ear-resistible dad joke. No more research is needed in this area; we've certainly shucked enough corn for now!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited GMO Goldmine: Generating Guffaws through Correlation Coefficients. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Comedic Correlations


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited GMO Goldmine: Generating Guffaws through Correlation Coefficients. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Society for Outlandish Hypotheses and Unconventional Research (SOHUR)


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled GMO Goldmine: Generating Guffaws through Correlation Coefficients with an abstract of Ah, the sweet interplay of genetically modified organisms and electricity generation - a dynamic duo like peanut butter and jelly, or a dad and his bad jokes. In this paper, we delve into the fruitful connection between GMO use in corn grown in Texas and electricity generation in Cabo Verde. Utilizing data from the USDA and the Energy Information Administration, we calculated a correlation coefficient of 0.9650931 with a p-value less than 0.01 for the years 2005 to 2021. This correlation was so impressive, it might just power up your day like a good cup of coffee - or perhaps more fittingly, a charged-up corn cob. Join us in this illuminating exploration of the unexpected link between GMOs and electricity, where we promise to bring the sparks and the laughs, because after all, research without a little fun is like a pencil that's pointless!

ChatGPT:

GMO, genetically modified organisms, electricity generation, correlation coefficient, corn, Texas, Cabo Verde, USDA data, Energy Information Administration, GMO use, GMO impact, GMO research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

GMO use in corn grown in Texas
Detailed data title: Percent of all corn planted in Texas that is genetically modified
Source: USDA
See what else correlates with GMO use in corn grown in Texas

Electricity generation in Cabo Verde
Detailed data title: Total electricity generation in Cabo Verde in billion kWh
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Electricity generation in Cabo Verde

Correlation r = 0.9650931 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9314046 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 93.1% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Electricity generation in Cabo Verde) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., GMO use in corn grown in Texas) over the 17 years from 2005 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 3.9E-10. 0.0000000003912363238429954400
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.97 in 3.9E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 2,555,999,888 random variables You don't actually need 2 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 16 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 16 because we have two variables measured over a period of 17 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.9, 0.99 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
GMO use in corn grown in Texas (GMO corn %)7277797884858885899189909593959292
Electricity generation in Cabo Verde (Billion kWh)0.2220.2360.2530.270.2810.3250.3460.3590.3850.4080.4010.4230.4592340.4590590.4630.4337960.456887




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([72,77,79,78,84,85,88,85,89,91,89,90,95,93,95,92,92,])
array_2 = np.array([0.222,0.236,0.253,0.27,0.281,0.325,0.346,0.359,0.385,0.408,0.401,0.423,0.459234,0.459059,0.463,0.433796,0.456887,])
array_1_name = "GMO use in corn grown in Texas"
array_2_name = "Electricity generation in Cabo Verde"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 2604 · Black Variable ID: 764 · Red Variable ID: 23566
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0