about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,600 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Google searches for 'cat memes' and the second variable is Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags.  The chart goes from 2004 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the nation collectively chuckled at feline antics, the sudden influx of cute cat memes overloaded the internet. This caused a chain reaction that interfered with the air bag deployment algorithms in cars, leading to a spike in automotive recalls. It seems that the internet just couldn't handle the purrfect combination of fluffy humor and vehicular safety!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Whimsical illustration ] Create an image of a group of adorable characters, each engrossed in their smartphones, with big grins on their faces as they scroll through 'cat memes' on Google. Their giggles are visually represented by colorful wavy lines emanating from their bellies, creating a joyful and lively atmosphere. In the background, show cars with airbags unexpectedly deploying due to the laughter-induced vibrations, hinting at an unforeseen consequence. The image should capture the comical nature of the scene with a touch of chaos, while maintaining a vibrant and whimsical illustration style. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Google searches for 'cat memes' and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Psychedelic A comic-book-style illustration with muted colors and a dotted halftone pattern from the 1960s Pop art Photorealism Whimsical illustration
ChatGPT: Whimsical illustration

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Google searches for 'cat memes' and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags, in the following situation: As people laughed at the cat memes, their bellies shook, causing a ripple effect that unknowingly set off faulty airbags in their cars. This unexpected airbag deployment led to a surge in automotive recalls, as manufacturers realized they had not purr-fected the safety mechanisms. In a fur-midable chain of events, the rise in cat memes led to a pawsitively catastrophic airbag situation – talk about a cat-astrophe!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: A group of people are giggling at their phones while scrolling through 'cat memes' on Google. As they laugh, their bellies shake, creating a ripple effect. Unbeknownst to them, this shaking triggers faulty airbags in their cars to unexpectedly deploy. This causes a surge in automotive recalls, with manufacturers realizing they had not purr-fected the safety mechanisms. The scene shows the unexpected chaining of events as laughter over cat memes leads to a catastrophic airbag situation.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Whimsical illustration ] and depicting this scene: A group of people are giggling at their phones while scrolling through 'cat memes' on Google. As they laugh, their bellies shake, creating a ripple effect. Unbeknownst to them, this shaking triggers faulty airbags in their cars to unexpectedly deploy. This causes a surge in automotive recalls, with manufacturers realizing they had not purr-fected the safety mechanisms. The scene shows the unexpected chaining of events as laughter over cat memes leads to a catastrophic airbag situation. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Whimsical illustration ] Create an image of a group of adorable characters, each engrossed in their smartphones, with big grins on their faces as they scroll through 'cat memes' on Google. Their giggles are visually represented by colorful wavy lines emanating from their bellies, creating a joyful and lively atmosphere. In the background, show cars with airbags unexpectedly deploying due to the laughter-induced vibrations, hinting at an unforeseen consequence. The image should capture the comical nature of the scene with a touch of chaos, while maintaining a vibrant and whimsical illustration style.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in cat memes (Google searches for 'cat memes') caused Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Cat Memes and Air Bags: An Unexpected Link? A Joke so Bad, You'll Need a Flair Bag

The Journal of Feline Technology and Safety

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Rhyme words in the title.

Your research team used data from Google Trends and US DOT to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9391723 and p < 0.01 for 2004 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Cat Memes and Air Bags: An Unexpected Link? A Joke so Bad, You'll Need a Flair Bag"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we explore the potential connection between internet searches for 'cat memes' and automotive recalls pertaining to air bag malfunctions. After tirelessly analyzing data from Google Trends and the US Department of Transportation, our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9391723 and p < 0.01 for the period ranging from 2004 to 2022. As we delved deeper into this peculiar relationship, we couldn't resist cracking a dad joke, "Why did the cat sit on the computer? Because it wanted to keep an eye on the mouse!" Our study sheds light on a correlation so unexpected, it's almost as surprising as finding a litter of kittens in a car engine!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cat Memes and Air Bags: An Unexpected Link? A Joke so Bad, You'll Need a Flair Bag"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we explore the potential connection between internet searches for 'cat memes' and automotive recalls pertaining to air bag malfunctions. After tirelessly analyzing data from Google Trends and the US Department of Transportation, our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9391723 and p < 0.01 for the period ranging from 2004 to 2022. As we delved deeper into this peculiar relationship, we couldn't resist cracking a dad joke, "Why did the cat sit on the computer? Because it wanted to keep an eye on the mouse!" Our study sheds light on a correlation so unexpected, it's almost as surprising as finding a litter of kittens in a car engine!

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of internet searches is an ever-evolving landscape, with users delving into a myriad of topics, from the profound to the profoundly silly. Similarly, the automotive industry experiences its own whirlwind of developments, from cutting-edge technology to unexpected recalls that can send shockwaves through the industry. In this paper, we offer a lighthearted yet serious examination of the potential relationship between two seemingly unrelated phenomena: the search for 'cat memes' and automotive recalls involving air bag issues. But before we dive into the data and analysis, let's start off with a classic dad joke: "Why don't cats play poker in the jungle? Too many cheetahs!"

It's not every day that one stumbles upon a correlation worthy of investigation in the world of data analysis, but as researchers, we are constantly seeking to unravel the unexpected. Our inquiry into this unlikely relationship was sparked by an offhand joke in the office, leading us down a rabbit hole of internet search trends and automotive safety concerns. Just like a curious feline, we pounced on this opportunity to explore a connection with potential implications for both industries.

As we sifted through mountains of Google search data and combed through reports of automotive recalls, we couldn't help but marvel at the statistical dance unfolding before our eyes. The correlation coefficient of 0.9391723 left us as surprised as a cat who discovers the elusive red dot had moved to a new location. With p < 0.01, the probability of this relationship being due to mere chance is about as likely as a cat voluntarily taking a bath – truly astonishing.

But let's not take ourselves too seriously, after all, this research is about the unexpected. So here's another cat-themed quip to lighten the mood: "What do you call a pile of cats? A meowtain!"

In the following sections, we'll delve into the underlying mechanisms of internet search behavior, exploring the psyche of the average internet user and their predilection for feline-related content. Simultaneously, we'll unravel the complexities of air bag technology and the factors contributing to automotive recalls, all the while maintaining a sense of humor and curiosity that reflects the unexpected nature of our findings. Join us on this journey as we uncover a correlation so uncanny, it's almost as inexplicable as a cat's aversion to water.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then you might move on to cartoons and children's shows that you watched for research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cat Memes and Air Bags: An Unexpected Link? A Joke so Bad, You'll Need a Flair Bag"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we explore the potential connection between internet searches for 'cat memes' and automotive recalls pertaining to air bag malfunctions. After tirelessly analyzing data from Google Trends and the US Department of Transportation, our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9391723 and p < 0.01 for the period ranging from 2004 to 2022. As we delved deeper into this peculiar relationship, we couldn't resist cracking a dad joke, "Why did the cat sit on the computer? Because it wanted to keep an eye on the mouse!" Our study sheds light on a correlation so unexpected, it's almost as surprising as finding a litter of kittens in a car engine!

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of internet searches is an ever-evolving landscape, with users delving into a myriad of topics, from the profound to the profoundly silly. Similarly, the automotive industry experiences its own whirlwind of developments, from cutting-edge technology to unexpected recalls that can send shockwaves through the industry. In this paper, we offer a lighthearted yet serious examination of the potential relationship between two seemingly unrelated phenomena: the search for 'cat memes' and automotive recalls involving air bag issues. But before we dive into the data and analysis, let's start off with a classic dad joke: "Why don't cats play poker in the jungle? Too many cheetahs!"
It's not every day that one stumbles upon a correlation worthy of investigation in the world of data analysis, but as researchers, we are constantly seeking to unravel the unexpected. Our inquiry into this unlikely relationship was sparked by an offhand joke in the office, leading us down a rabbit hole of internet search trends and automotive safety concerns. Just like a curious feline, we pounced on this opportunity to explore a connection with potential implications for both industries.
As we sifted through mountains of Google search data and combed through reports of automotive recalls, we couldn't help but marvel at the statistical dance unfolding before our eyes. The correlation coefficient of 0.9391723 left us as surprised as a cat who discovers the elusive red dot had moved to a new location. With p < 0.01, the probability of this relationship being due to mere chance is about as likely as a cat voluntarily taking a bath – truly astonishing.
But let's not take ourselves too seriously, after all, this research is about the unexpected. So here's another cat-themed quip to lighten the mood: "What do you call a pile of cats? A meowtain!"
In the following sections, we'll delve into the underlying mechanisms of internet search behavior, exploring the psyche of the average internet user and their predilection for feline-related content. Simultaneously, we'll unravel the complexities of air bag technology and the factors contributing to automotive recalls, all the while maintaining a sense of humor and curiosity that reflects the unexpected nature of our findings. Join us on this journey as we uncover a correlation so uncanny, it's almost as inexplicable as a cat's aversion to water.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The link between internet phenomena and automotive safety concerns has garnered increased attention in recent years. In "Smith et al.'s Study of Internet Trends and Product Recalls," the authors delve into the realm of online search behavior and its potential implications for consumer behavior and product safety. Meanwhile, Doe's "Analysis of Automotive Safety Recalls" provides a comprehensive overview of the factors contributing to recalls, with a focus on air bag malfunctions and their impact on vehicle safety standards. Jones' "Consumer Preferences in the Digital Age" sheds light on the evolving nature of online content consumption, offering insights into the popularity of feline-themed internet content.

Moving beyond traditional academic sources, "The Art of Racing in the Rain" by Garth Stein and "Crash Test Girl" by Kari Byron offer unique perspectives from the world of fiction and popular science, respectively. While the former provides a poignant narrative interwoven with automotive themes, the latter delves into the realm of engineering and experimentation, offering a whimsical yet informative exploration of scientific concepts.

As we endeavored to understand the dynamic relationship between Google searches for 'cat memes' and automotive recalls related to air bags, we ventured beyond the confines of scholarly texts, immersing ourselves in cartoons and children's shows. The animated series "ThunderCats" and "Garfield and Friends" provided unexpected inspiration, offering a lighthearted yet thought-provoking perspective on feline-related content and its potential impact on consumer attitudes toward automotive safety features. In the spirit of this unconventional approach, we couldn't resist a feline-themed pun: "What's a cat's favorite color? Purrrr-ple!"

Emerging from this exploratory journey into diverse sources of literature, we were struck by the uncanny alignment between internet search trends and automotive safety concerns. Our research seeks to illuminate this unexpected connection, unveiling a correlation so surprising, it's almost as astonishing as a cat performing a magic trick – truly paw-some.

Continuing on our quest, we turn our attention to the empirical analysis of Google search data, aiming to unravel the intricacies of internet user behavior and its implications for automotive industry dynamics. Stay tuned, as we embark on a whimsical yet illuminating expedition into the world of 'cat memes' and air bag recalls, where unexpected discoveries await at every turn.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and US DOT . You used data from 2004 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cat Memes and Air Bags: An Unexpected Link? A Joke so Bad, You'll Need a Flair Bag"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we explore the potential connection between internet searches for 'cat memes' and automotive recalls pertaining to air bag malfunctions. After tirelessly analyzing data from Google Trends and the US Department of Transportation, our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9391723 and p < 0.01 for the period ranging from 2004 to 2022. As we delved deeper into this peculiar relationship, we couldn't resist cracking a dad joke, "Why did the cat sit on the computer? Because it wanted to keep an eye on the mouse!" Our study sheds light on a correlation so unexpected, it's almost as surprising as finding a litter of kittens in a car engine!

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of internet searches is an ever-evolving landscape, with users delving into a myriad of topics, from the profound to the profoundly silly. Similarly, the automotive industry experiences its own whirlwind of developments, from cutting-edge technology to unexpected recalls that can send shockwaves through the industry. In this paper, we offer a lighthearted yet serious examination of the potential relationship between two seemingly unrelated phenomena: the search for 'cat memes' and automotive recalls involving air bag issues. But before we dive into the data and analysis, let's start off with a classic dad joke: "Why don't cats play poker in the jungle? Too many cheetahs!"
It's not every day that one stumbles upon a correlation worthy of investigation in the world of data analysis, but as researchers, we are constantly seeking to unravel the unexpected. Our inquiry into this unlikely relationship was sparked by an offhand joke in the office, leading us down a rabbit hole of internet search trends and automotive safety concerns. Just like a curious feline, we pounced on this opportunity to explore a connection with potential implications for both industries.
As we sifted through mountains of Google search data and combed through reports of automotive recalls, we couldn't help but marvel at the statistical dance unfolding before our eyes. The correlation coefficient of 0.9391723 left us as surprised as a cat who discovers the elusive red dot had moved to a new location. With p < 0.01, the probability of this relationship being due to mere chance is about as likely as a cat voluntarily taking a bath – truly astonishing.
But let's not take ourselves too seriously, after all, this research is about the unexpected. So here's another cat-themed quip to lighten the mood: "What do you call a pile of cats? A meowtain!"
In the following sections, we'll delve into the underlying mechanisms of internet search behavior, exploring the psyche of the average internet user and their predilection for feline-related content. Simultaneously, we'll unravel the complexities of air bag technology and the factors contributing to automotive recalls, all the while maintaining a sense of humor and curiosity that reflects the unexpected nature of our findings. Join us on this journey as we uncover a correlation so uncanny, it's almost as inexplicable as a cat's aversion to water.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the potential connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and automotive recalls related to air bag malfunctions, our research team employed a blend of quantitative and qualitative methods, akin to the eclectic mix of cat breeds one might find at a feline enthusiasts' convention. We initially navigated through the vast expanse of Google Trends data, meticulously tracking the frequency and geographic distribution of 'cat memes' searches across the internet. We also scrutinized the US Department of Transportation's database to identify automotive recalls specifically linked to air bag defects, akin to a vigilant house cat meticulously tracking down a wayward strand of yarn.

Furthermore, we implemented a particularly innovative approach by incorporating sentiment analysis to gauge the emotional undercurrents behind the aforementioned internet searches. Like a cat carefully pawing at a ball of yarn, we systematically parsed through user comments and interactions associated with 'cat memes' to discern the prevailing sentiments, discovering that the majority of users expressed feline-related content with a purr-fectly delightful tone.

In addition to our digital endeavors, we also conducted interviews with automotive experts and enthusiasts, seeking to unravel the potential links between internet culture and automotive safety, maintaining a feline-like curiosity throughout our interactions. Our research team also employed data visualization techniques, depicting the correlation between 'cat memes' searches and air bag-related recalls with visual clarity akin to a well-groomed Persian cat's fur.

For the statistical analysis, we utilized a technique as precise as a cat's calculated leap onto a windowsill, employing a Pearson correlation coefficient to ascertain the strength and direction of the relationship between 'cat memes' searches and air bag recalls. As a further measure, we employed a time-series analysis to discern any temporal patterns in the occurrence of these phenomena, ensuring no proverbial cat was let out of the bag in our pursuit of thorough analysis.

Finally, to validate our findings, we engaged in peer discussions and reviews, akin to a litter of kittens playfully batting at a ball of yarn. Our methodology, while light-hearted at times, remained steadfast in its pursuit of uncovering the unexpected, much like a cat's unwavering determination to track a laser pointer's elusive beam.

In conclusion, our research methodology embraced an assortment of approaches, akin to the diverse personalities one might encounter within a household of felines. We endeavored to maintain a light-hearted yet rigorous approach, infusing our methodology with a playful spirit that mirrored the unexpected nature of our inquiry.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Google Trends and US DOT .

For the time period 2004 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9391723, r-squared of 0.8820446, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Cat Memes and Air Bags: An Unexpected Link? A Joke so Bad, You'll Need a Flair Bag"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we explore the potential connection between internet searches for 'cat memes' and automotive recalls pertaining to air bag malfunctions. After tirelessly analyzing data from Google Trends and the US Department of Transportation, our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9391723 and p < 0.01 for the period ranging from 2004 to 2022. As we delved deeper into this peculiar relationship, we couldn't resist cracking a dad joke, "Why did the cat sit on the computer? Because it wanted to keep an eye on the mouse!" Our study sheds light on a correlation so unexpected, it's almost as surprising as finding a litter of kittens in a car engine!

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of internet searches is an ever-evolving landscape, with users delving into a myriad of topics, from the profound to the profoundly silly. Similarly, the automotive industry experiences its own whirlwind of developments, from cutting-edge technology to unexpected recalls that can send shockwaves through the industry. In this paper, we offer a lighthearted yet serious examination of the potential relationship between two seemingly unrelated phenomena: the search for 'cat memes' and automotive recalls involving air bag issues. But before we dive into the data and analysis, let's start off with a classic dad joke: "Why don't cats play poker in the jungle? Too many cheetahs!"
It's not every day that one stumbles upon a correlation worthy of investigation in the world of data analysis, but as researchers, we are constantly seeking to unravel the unexpected. Our inquiry into this unlikely relationship was sparked by an offhand joke in the office, leading us down a rabbit hole of internet search trends and automotive safety concerns. Just like a curious feline, we pounced on this opportunity to explore a connection with potential implications for both industries.
As we sifted through mountains of Google search data and combed through reports of automotive recalls, we couldn't help but marvel at the statistical dance unfolding before our eyes. The correlation coefficient of 0.9391723 left us as surprised as a cat who discovers the elusive red dot had moved to a new location. With p < 0.01, the probability of this relationship being due to mere chance is about as likely as a cat voluntarily taking a bath – truly astonishing.
But let's not take ourselves too seriously, after all, this research is about the unexpected. So here's another cat-themed quip to lighten the mood: "What do you call a pile of cats? A meowtain!"
In the following sections, we'll delve into the underlying mechanisms of internet search behavior, exploring the psyche of the average internet user and their predilection for feline-related content. Simultaneously, we'll unravel the complexities of air bag technology and the factors contributing to automotive recalls, all the while maintaining a sense of humor and curiosity that reflects the unexpected nature of our findings. Join us on this journey as we uncover a correlation so uncanny, it's almost as inexplicable as a cat's aversion to water.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The careful analysis of Google Trends data and US Department of Transportation records uncovered a striking correlation between the frequency of searches for 'cat memes' and the occurrence of automotive recalls related to air bag malfunctions. Over the period from 2004 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9391723, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. Much like a cat chasing a laser pointer, the connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena drew us in with its unpredictability and elusiveness.

The observed relationship is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8820446, signifying that approximately 88.20% of the variability in automotive recalls for air bag issues can be explained by the frequency of searches for 'cat memes.' This level of explanatory power is as remarkable as a cat's ability to always land on its feet—truly impressive and a bit baffling at the same time.

The statistical significance of our findings is underscored by a p-value of less than 0.01. In other words, the probability of this correlation occurring by chance is exceptionally low, akin to the odds of successfully herding a group of cats. These results point to a robust association between the online interest in feline-related entertainment and real-world automotive safety concerns, leaving us pondering the interconnectedness of human behavior and technological mishaps.

Fig. 1: A scatterplot depicting the strong correlation between Google searches for 'cat memes' and automotive recalls for air bag malfunctions.

Overall, our analysis offers compelling evidence of a surprising link between internet search behavior and automotive safety issues, prompting further exploration into the potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship. As we continue to unravel the mysteries of this peculiar association, we can't help but be reminded of a classic feline-inspired joke: "What is a cat's favorite color? Purrr-ple!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Cat Memes and Air Bags: An Unexpected Link? A Joke so Bad, You'll Need a Flair Bag"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we explore the potential connection between internet searches for 'cat memes' and automotive recalls pertaining to air bag malfunctions. After tirelessly analyzing data from Google Trends and the US Department of Transportation, our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9391723 and p < 0.01 for the period ranging from 2004 to 2022. As we delved deeper into this peculiar relationship, we couldn't resist cracking a dad joke, "Why did the cat sit on the computer? Because it wanted to keep an eye on the mouse!" Our study sheds light on a correlation so unexpected, it's almost as surprising as finding a litter of kittens in a car engine!

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The link between internet phenomena and automotive safety concerns has garnered increased attention in recent years. In "Smith et al.'s Study of Internet Trends and Product Recalls," the authors delve into the realm of online search behavior and its potential implications for consumer behavior and product safety. Meanwhile, Doe's "Analysis of Automotive Safety Recalls" provides a comprehensive overview of the factors contributing to recalls, with a focus on air bag malfunctions and their impact on vehicle safety standards. Jones' "Consumer Preferences in the Digital Age" sheds light on the evolving nature of online content consumption, offering insights into the popularity of feline-themed internet content.
Moving beyond traditional academic sources, "The Art of Racing in the Rain" by Garth Stein and "Crash Test Girl" by Kari Byron offer unique perspectives from the world of fiction and popular science, respectively. While the former provides a poignant narrative interwoven with automotive themes, the latter delves into the realm of engineering and experimentation, offering a whimsical yet informative exploration of scientific concepts.
As we endeavored to understand the dynamic relationship between Google searches for 'cat memes' and automotive recalls related to air bags, we ventured beyond the confines of scholarly texts, immersing ourselves in cartoons and children's shows. The animated series "ThunderCats" and "Garfield and Friends" provided unexpected inspiration, offering a lighthearted yet thought-provoking perspective on feline-related content and its potential impact on consumer attitudes toward automotive safety features. In the spirit of this unconventional approach, we couldn't resist a feline-themed pun: "What's a cat's favorite color? Purrrr-ple!"
Emerging from this exploratory journey into diverse sources of literature, we were struck by the uncanny alignment between internet search trends and automotive safety concerns. Our research seeks to illuminate this unexpected connection, unveiling a correlation so surprising, it's almost as astonishing as a cat performing a magic trick – truly paw-some.
Continuing on our quest, we turn our attention to the empirical analysis of Google search data, aiming to unravel the intricacies of internet user behavior and its implications for automotive industry dynamics. Stay tuned, as we embark on a whimsical yet illuminating expedition into the world of 'cat memes' and air bag recalls, where unexpected discoveries await at every turn.

[[RESULTS]]
The careful analysis of Google Trends data and US Department of Transportation records uncovered a striking correlation between the frequency of searches for 'cat memes' and the occurrence of automotive recalls related to air bag malfunctions. Over the period from 2004 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9391723, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. Much like a cat chasing a laser pointer, the connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena drew us in with its unpredictability and elusiveness.
The observed relationship is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8820446, signifying that approximately 88.20% of the variability in automotive recalls for air bag issues can be explained by the frequency of searches for 'cat memes.' This level of explanatory power is as remarkable as a cat's ability to always land on its feet—truly impressive and a bit baffling at the same time.
The statistical significance of our findings is underscored by a p-value of less than 0.01. In other words, the probability of this correlation occurring by chance is exceptionally low, akin to the odds of successfully herding a group of cats. These results point to a robust association between the online interest in feline-related entertainment and real-world automotive safety concerns, leaving us pondering the interconnectedness of human behavior and technological mishaps.
Fig. 1: A scatterplot depicting the strong correlation between Google searches for 'cat memes' and automotive recalls for air bag malfunctions.
Overall, our analysis offers compelling evidence of a surprising link between internet search behavior and automotive safety issues, prompting further exploration into the potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship. As we continue to unravel the mysteries of this peculiar association, we can't help but be reminded of a classic feline-inspired joke: "What is a cat's favorite color? Purrr-ple!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The results of our study have revealed a highly significant and robust correlation between Google searches for 'cat memes' and automotive recalls pertaining to air bag malfunctions. These findings not only confirm the unexpected relationship between these seemingly unrelated phenomena but also raise intriguing questions about the behavioral and social factors influencing consumer attitudes towards product safety. It's like stumbling upon a cat wearing a seatbelt – unexpected, yet somehow fitting.

Our findings correspond with previous research that has highlighted the impact of online search behavior on consumer preferences and product safety evaluations. Smith et al.'s study on Internet Trends and Product Recalls laid the groundwork for understanding the potential influence of online content consumption on consumer product perceptions. The patterns observed in our study align closely with their findings, painting a picture of the internet's whimsical sway over consumer behavior. As we delved further into the connection between 'cat memes' and air bag recalls, we couldn't help but be reminded of a fitting feline-themed joke: "What do you call a pile of cats? A meow-tain!"

Additionally, the salient relationship between internet search trends and automotive safety concerns echoes Doe's Analysis of Automotive Safety Recalls, which emphasized the significance of air bag malfunctions as a critical factor in vehicle safety. Our examination of the Google Trends data further underscores the unexpected yet compelling correlation, akin to a feline-themed magic trick that leaves one both bewildered and amused.

Moreover, the exploratory nature of our investigation, drawing inspiration from diverse sources such as cartoons and children's shows, has shed light on the complex interplay between online culture and real-world safety implications. The playful yet informative perspectives offered by "ThunderCats" and "Garfield and Friends" served as an unexpected source of insight, adding a touch of whimsy to our scholarly pursuit. This improbable fusion of lighthearted content and serious safety concerns brings to mind another feline-inspired jest: "Why don't cats play poker in the jungle? Too many cheetahs!"

The statistical robustness of our results, characterized by a high correlation coefficient and a significant explanatory power, reinforces the unexpected yet compelling association between online interest in feline-themed content and automotive safety concerns. The sheer magnitude of this connection is reminiscent of the surprising agility of a cat leaping from a precarious perch, leaving us both bemused and impressed by the intricate dynamics at play.

In conclusion, our research offers substantive evidence of a striking link between internet search behavior and automotive safety issues. These findings not only hint at the whimsical nature of human behavior but also underscore the need for further exploration into the underlying mechanisms of this unexpected correlation. As we strive to untangle the complexities of this intriguing relationship, we remain mindful of the enduring spirit of curiosity, keeping in mind yet another fitting feline-themed quip: "What do you call a pile of sleeping cats? A meow-tain range!"


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Google searches for 'cat memes' and Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Stay serious and dry most of the time, but then occasionally let your wit shine through.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Cat Memes and Air Bags: An Unexpected Link? A Joke so Bad, You'll Need a Flair Bag"

[[ABSTRACT]]
In this research paper, we explore the potential connection between internet searches for 'cat memes' and automotive recalls pertaining to air bag malfunctions. After tirelessly analyzing data from Google Trends and the US Department of Transportation, our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9391723 and p < 0.01 for the period ranging from 2004 to 2022. As we delved deeper into this peculiar relationship, we couldn't resist cracking a dad joke, "Why did the cat sit on the computer? Because it wanted to keep an eye on the mouse!" Our study sheds light on a correlation so unexpected, it's almost as surprising as finding a litter of kittens in a car engine!

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of internet searches is an ever-evolving landscape, with users delving into a myriad of topics, from the profound to the profoundly silly. Similarly, the automotive industry experiences its own whirlwind of developments, from cutting-edge technology to unexpected recalls that can send shockwaves through the industry. In this paper, we offer a lighthearted yet serious examination of the potential relationship between two seemingly unrelated phenomena: the search for 'cat memes' and automotive recalls involving air bag issues. But before we dive into the data and analysis, let's start off with a classic dad joke: "Why don't cats play poker in the jungle? Too many cheetahs!"
It's not every day that one stumbles upon a correlation worthy of investigation in the world of data analysis, but as researchers, we are constantly seeking to unravel the unexpected. Our inquiry into this unlikely relationship was sparked by an offhand joke in the office, leading us down a rabbit hole of internet search trends and automotive safety concerns. Just like a curious feline, we pounced on this opportunity to explore a connection with potential implications for both industries.
As we sifted through mountains of Google search data and combed through reports of automotive recalls, we couldn't help but marvel at the statistical dance unfolding before our eyes. The correlation coefficient of 0.9391723 left us as surprised as a cat who discovers the elusive red dot had moved to a new location. With p < 0.01, the probability of this relationship being due to mere chance is about as likely as a cat voluntarily taking a bath – truly astonishing.
But let's not take ourselves too seriously, after all, this research is about the unexpected. So here's another cat-themed quip to lighten the mood: "What do you call a pile of cats? A meowtain!"
In the following sections, we'll delve into the underlying mechanisms of internet search behavior, exploring the psyche of the average internet user and their predilection for feline-related content. Simultaneously, we'll unravel the complexities of air bag technology and the factors contributing to automotive recalls, all the while maintaining a sense of humor and curiosity that reflects the unexpected nature of our findings. Join us on this journey as we uncover a correlation so uncanny, it's almost as inexplicable as a cat's aversion to water.

[[RESULTS]]
The careful analysis of Google Trends data and US Department of Transportation records uncovered a striking correlation between the frequency of searches for 'cat memes' and the occurrence of automotive recalls related to air bag malfunctions. Over the period from 2004 to 2022, we found a correlation coefficient of 0.9391723, indicating a strong positive relationship between the two variables. Much like a cat chasing a laser pointer, the connection between these seemingly disparate phenomena drew us in with its unpredictability and elusiveness.
The observed relationship is further supported by an r-squared value of 0.8820446, signifying that approximately 88.20% of the variability in automotive recalls for air bag issues can be explained by the frequency of searches for 'cat memes.' This level of explanatory power is as remarkable as a cat's ability to always land on its feet—truly impressive and a bit baffling at the same time.
The statistical significance of our findings is underscored by a p-value of less than 0.01. In other words, the probability of this correlation occurring by chance is exceptionally low, akin to the odds of successfully herding a group of cats. These results point to a robust association between the online interest in feline-related entertainment and real-world automotive safety concerns, leaving us pondering the interconnectedness of human behavior and technological mishaps.
Fig. 1: A scatterplot depicting the strong correlation between Google searches for 'cat memes' and automotive recalls for air bag malfunctions.
Overall, our analysis offers compelling evidence of a surprising link between internet search behavior and automotive safety issues, prompting further exploration into the potential mechanisms underlying this unexpected relationship. As we continue to unravel the mysteries of this peculiar association, we can't help but be reminded of a classic feline-inspired joke: "What is a cat's favorite color? Purrr-ple!"

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has revealed a statistically significant correlation between the frequency of Google searches for 'cat memes' and automotive recalls pertaining to air bag malfunctions. This unexpected association, akin to discovering a whiskered stowaway in an air duct, highlights the need for further investigation into the interplay between online interests and real-world safety concerns.

The strong correlation coefficient of 0.9391723 indicates a compelling link between these seemingly unrelated phenomena, capturing our attention like a laser pointer does to a curious feline. Additionally, the high r-squared value of 0.8820446 showcases the substantial explanatory power of 'cat memes' searches in predicting automotive recalls, much like a cat's uncanny ability to predict the sound of a treat bag opening.

Furthermore, the low p-value reinforces the robustness of this relationship, emphasizing that the likelihood of this correlation being due to chance is as slim as a cat fitting into a shoebox. These findings suggest that there may be underlying behavioral or cultural factors driving this curious connection, prompting us to ponder the enigmatic ways in which human interests intersect with technological intricacies.

In light of these compelling results, we assert that no further research is needed in this area. Like a cat adamantly refusing to be herded, the unexpected link between 'cat memes' and automotive recalls for air bag issues has been thoroughly addressed, leaving us with newfound insights and a collection of feline-inspired jokes to last a lifetime.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Cat Memes and Air Bags: An Unexpected Link? A Joke so Bad, You'll Need a Flair Bag. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Feline Technology and Safety


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Cat Memes and Air Bags: An Unexpected Link? A Joke so Bad, You'll Need a Flair Bag. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Association for Feline Studies and Automotive Safety


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Cat Memes and Air Bags: An Unexpected Link? A Joke so Bad, You'll Need a Flair Bag with an abstract of In this research paper, we explore the potential connection between internet searches for 'cat memes' and automotive recalls pertaining to air bag malfunctions. After tirelessly analyzing data from Google Trends and the US Department of Transportation, our findings revealed a surprisingly high correlation coefficient of 0.9391723 and p < 0.01 for the period ranging from 2004 to 2022. As we delved deeper into this peculiar relationship, we couldn't resist cracking a dad joke, "Why did the cat sit on the computer? Because it wanted to keep an eye on the mouse!" Our study sheds light on a correlation so unexpected, it's almost as surprising as finding a litter of kittens in a car engine!

ChatGPT:

"cat memes internet searches," "automotive recalls air bag malfunctions," "correlation coefficient analysis," "Google Trends data analysis," "US Department of Transportation data," "unexpected correlation study," "dadjokes in research," "internet culture impact," "automotive safety issues," "unusual statistical findings"

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Google searches for 'cat memes'
Detailed data title: Relative volume of Google searches for 'cat memes' (Worldwide, without quotes)
Source: Google Trends
Additional Info: Relative search volume (not absolute numbers)

See what else correlates with Google searches for 'cat memes'

Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags
Source: US DOT
See what else correlates with Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags

Correlation r = 0.9391723 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.8820446 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 88.2% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Google searches for 'cat memes') over the 19 years from 2004 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 2.6E-9. 0.0000000025952518346885703000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.94 in 2.6E-7% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 385,319,061 random variables You don't actually need 385 million variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 18 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 18 because we have two variables measured over a period of 19 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.85, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Google searches for 'cat memes' (Rel. search volume)0.1666670.250.18181810.250.3333330.51.69.2519.2519.529.7536.666740.535.7545.333330.16672123.75
Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags (Recalls)141812151311161423314869106999185587437




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([0.166667,0.25,0.181818,1,0.25,0.333333,0.5,1.6,9.25,19.25,19.5,29.75,36.6667,40.5,35.75,45.3333,30.1667,21,23.75,])
array_2 = np.array([14,18,12,15,13,11,16,14,23,31,48,69,106,99,91,85,58,74,37,])
array_1_name = "Google searches for 'cat memes'"
array_2_name = "Automotive recalls for issues with the Air Bags"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your rating is stellar!


Correlation ID: 2600 · Black Variable ID: 1355 · Red Variable ID: 1105
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0