about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,590 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the second variable is Liquefied petroleum gas used in Zambia.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2019, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

As the demand for handmade leather shoes from Maine skyrocketed, so did the need for quality, artisanal buffing. The excessive buffing led to an unexpected surge in static electricity, sparking an international shortage of LPG as it mysteriously diverted to Zambia, where it was affectionately nicknamed the "shoemaker's spark." It just go to show, when Maine's cobblers are on a roll, even the most unlikely places feel the sizzle of their craftsmanship!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: An image depicting a dimly lit shop floor in Maine, filled with shoe and leather workers bent over their workstations, cobbling and repairing shoes. The air is filled with a soft glow as the workers' movements generate shimmering Liquefied Petroleum Gas molecules, visible as colorful, translucent orbs. These orbs begin to gently float upwards, forming a swirling trail that extends across the Atlantic ocean to Zambia, where they materialize into actual gas stoves and other LPG-powered devices being used by families to cook and warm their homes. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Zambia. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: Futuristic Magic realism Cyberpunk An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars' Magic realism
ChatGPT: An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Zambia, in the following situation: As the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine fluctuated, so did the collective energy of their foot-stomping and hand-cobbling maneuvers. This energy, in a bizarre and inexplicable phenomenon, was somehow being transmuted into Liquefied Petroleum Gas molecules and teleported to Zambia, where it was eagerly embraced by gas stoves and other LPG-powered devices. The world may never fully understand the mysterious ways in which Maine's shoemakers and leather workers inadvertently influenced the cooking habits of the Zambian populace.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small workshop in Maine, the shoe and leather workers and repairers were busily at work, their footsteps and hand-cobbling echoing throughout the room. As they worked, a strange transformation occurred, and the energy from their movements somehow converted into shimmering Liquefied Petroleum Gas molecules. These mysterious molecules then embarked on a journey across the ocean, teleporting themselves all the way to Zambia, where they were eagerly embraced by gas stoves and other LPG-powered devices, bringing warmth and sustenance to the Zambian populace.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ An image that looks like it is a scene from 'Star Wars'. ] and depicting this scene: In a small workshop in Maine, the shoe and leather workers and repairers were busily at work, their footsteps and hand-cobbling echoing throughout the room. As they worked, a strange transformation occurred, and the energy from their movements somehow converted into shimmering Liquefied Petroleum Gas molecules. These mysterious molecules then embarked on a journey across the ocean, teleporting themselves all the way to Zambia, where they were eagerly embraced by gas stoves and other LPG-powered devices, bringing warmth and sustenance to the Zambian populace. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: An image depicting a dimly lit shop floor in Maine, filled with shoe and leather workers bent over their workstations, cobbling and repairing shoes. The air is filled with a soft glow as the workers' movements generate shimmering Liquefied Petroleum Gas molecules, visible as colorful, translucent orbs. These orbs begin to gently float upwards, forming a swirling trail that extends across the Atlantic ocean to Zambia, where they materialize into actual gas stoves and other LPG-powered devices being used by families to cook and warm their homes.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how an increase in The number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine caused Liquefied petroleum gas used in Zambia to increase.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Putting the Sole in LPG: The Unlikely Link between Shoe and Leather Workers in Maine and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Usage in Zambia

The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Footwear Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Zambia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8524589 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2019.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Putting the "Sole" in LPG: The Unlikely Link between Shoe and Leather Workers in Maine and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Usage in Zambia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the unexpected relationship between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Zambia. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team aimed to investigate this seemingly incongruous connection. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8524589 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2019.

The results indicate that as the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine increased, there was a corresponding surge in the use of LPG in Zambia. This perplexing correlation raises intriguing questions and prompts further investigation into potential underlying mechanisms. It seems that the impact of shoe and leather craftsmanship extends far beyond the soles of our shoes - perhaps it reaches the hearts of Zambians relying on LPG for cooking and heating. Why did the shoe repairman go to therapy? Because he had too many sole-searching problems.

These findings highlight the unforeseen interconnections in the global economy and emphasize the need for interdisciplinary research to unravel the complex webs of influence. As we delve deeper into this peculiar correlation, we invite scholars to join us in this exploration that promises to pave the way for a greater understanding of the intricate network of economic relationships. Why don't shoe makers ever win an argument? They always end up on the wrong foot.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Zambia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Putting the "Sole" in LPG: The Unlikely Link between Shoe and Leather Workers in Maine and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Usage in Zambia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the unexpected relationship between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Zambia. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team aimed to investigate this seemingly incongruous connection. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8524589 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2019.

The results indicate that as the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine increased, there was a corresponding surge in the use of LPG in Zambia. This perplexing correlation raises intriguing questions and prompts further investigation into potential underlying mechanisms. It seems that the impact of shoe and leather craftsmanship extends far beyond the soles of our shoes - perhaps it reaches the hearts of Zambians relying on LPG for cooking and heating. Why did the shoe repairman go to therapy? Because he had too many sole-searching problems.

These findings highlight the unforeseen interconnections in the global economy and emphasize the need for interdisciplinary research to unravel the complex webs of influence. As we delve deeper into this peculiar correlation, we invite scholars to join us in this exploration that promises to pave the way for a greater understanding of the intricate network of economic relationships. Why don't shoe makers ever win an argument? They always end up on the wrong foot.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

The world of economic research often leads us down unexpected paths, uncovering connections that boggle the mind and challenge conventional wisdom. Our investigation into the relationship between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the usage of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Zambia is a prime example of such an enigma. This study aims to shed light on the perplexing association that seems to defy traditional economic logic.

As we immerse ourselves in the realm of statistical analysis, we find ourselves walking on a path strewn with shoemaker puns and LPG-related jokes. So, without further adieu (or should we say, a shoe), let's lace up our hypotheses and set out on this unexpected journey of discovery. Why did the cobbler become a politician? He knew how to heel in the opposition.

Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on a quest to understand if there was more to the correlation between these seemingly disparate variables than meets the eye. Our initial suspicions were met with a healthy dose of skepticism, reminiscent of the disbelief one may encounter when trying to convince their friends that LPG usage and shoe repair might go hand in hand (or should we say, foot in foot?). Why did the shoemaker go to school? To get a little sole.

The significance of this investigation goes beyond the confines of traditional economic models; it speaks to the interconnectedness of global economic patterns and the intricacies that underpin seemingly unrelated industries. Our foray into this unexplored territory promises to uncover insights that might force us to throw away our preconceived notions of economic cause and effect. Why did the shoes break up? They couldn't tie the knot.

In navigating the labyrinth of data analysis and variable correlations, we urge our fellow scholars to join us in this rather unusual exploration. Together, we can unlock the mysteries of economic interdependencies and, who knows, maybe even stumble upon a pair of statistical Cinderella slippers. Why did the shoe file a police report? It got caught in a heel.

As we embark on this intellectual journey, let us tread lightly and be mindful of the unexpected correlations that may lie just beneath the surface. And who knows, perhaps by the end of this research, we'll have all walked a mile in the shoes of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and gained a newfound appreciation for the impact of their labor on the other side of the globe. Why don't we ever see a shoe with a silver lining? Because it's always cobbled together with something else.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Zambia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Putting the "Sole" in LPG: The Unlikely Link between Shoe and Leather Workers in Maine and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Usage in Zambia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the unexpected relationship between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Zambia. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team aimed to investigate this seemingly incongruous connection. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8524589 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2019.

The results indicate that as the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine increased, there was a corresponding surge in the use of LPG in Zambia. This perplexing correlation raises intriguing questions and prompts further investigation into potential underlying mechanisms. It seems that the impact of shoe and leather craftsmanship extends far beyond the soles of our shoes - perhaps it reaches the hearts of Zambians relying on LPG for cooking and heating. Why did the shoe repairman go to therapy? Because he had too many sole-searching problems.

These findings highlight the unforeseen interconnections in the global economy and emphasize the need for interdisciplinary research to unravel the complex webs of influence. As we delve deeper into this peculiar correlation, we invite scholars to join us in this exploration that promises to pave the way for a greater understanding of the intricate network of economic relationships. Why don't shoe makers ever win an argument? They always end up on the wrong foot.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of economic research often leads us down unexpected paths, uncovering connections that boggle the mind and challenge conventional wisdom. Our investigation into the relationship between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the usage of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Zambia is a prime example of such an enigma. This study aims to shed light on the perplexing association that seems to defy traditional economic logic.
As we immerse ourselves in the realm of statistical analysis, we find ourselves walking on a path strewn with shoemaker puns and LPG-related jokes. So, without further adieu (or should we say, a shoe), let's lace up our hypotheses and set out on this unexpected journey of discovery. Why did the cobbler become a politician? He knew how to heel in the opposition.
Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on a quest to understand if there was more to the correlation between these seemingly disparate variables than meets the eye. Our initial suspicions were met with a healthy dose of skepticism, reminiscent of the disbelief one may encounter when trying to convince their friends that LPG usage and shoe repair might go hand in hand (or should we say, foot in foot?). Why did the shoemaker go to school? To get a little sole.
The significance of this investigation goes beyond the confines of traditional economic models; it speaks to the interconnectedness of global economic patterns and the intricacies that underpin seemingly unrelated industries. Our foray into this unexplored territory promises to uncover insights that might force us to throw away our preconceived notions of economic cause and effect. Why did the shoes break up? They couldn't tie the knot.
In navigating the labyrinth of data analysis and variable correlations, we urge our fellow scholars to join us in this rather unusual exploration. Together, we can unlock the mysteries of economic interdependencies and, who knows, maybe even stumble upon a pair of statistical Cinderella slippers. Why did the shoe file a police report? It got caught in a heel.
As we embark on this intellectual journey, let us tread lightly and be mindful of the unexpected correlations that may lie just beneath the surface. And who knows, perhaps by the end of this research, we'll have all walked a mile in the shoes of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and gained a newfound appreciation for the impact of their labor on the other side of the globe. Why don't we ever see a shoe with a silver lining? Because it's always cobbled together with something else.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

The relationship between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the usage of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Zambia has perplexed researchers for many years. In "Smith et al.," the authors find a surprising correlation between the two variables, prompting further investigation into potential causal mechanisms. Lorem and ipsum were used to illustrate the strength of this relationship, leaving many scratching their heads in disbelief.

Adding to the existing body of literature, "Doe" introduces a compelling argument for the unexpected interconnectedness of seemingly distinct economic indicators. The authors posit that the work of shoe and leather craftsmen may have a more profound impact on global LPG usage than previously anticipated. While the data may seem puzzling at first, a closer examination reveals a hidden narrative that challenges traditional economic paradigms.

In the context of economic theory, "Jones" presents a comprehensive analysis of the intricate web of economic relationships that extend beyond traditional sector boundaries. This work sheds light on the often overlooked influence of niche industries on seemingly unrelated sectors, offering a fresh perspective on the interconnectivity of economic phenomena. The findings of this study have broad implications for our understanding of global economic dynamics, challenging scholars to think outside the box.

Turning to non-fiction literature relevant to this research, "The World is Flat" by Thomas L. Friedman offers a thought-provoking exploration of global interconnectedness and its impact on economic systems. The intricate web of economic relationships depicted in this work resonates with the unexpected correlation between shoe and leather workers in Maine and LPG usage in Zambia, urging scholars to reexamine their assumptions about economic causality.

On a lighter note, "The Cobbler's Wife" by Lyn Cote and "Shoe Addicts Anonymous" by Beth Harbison provide fictional accounts of the lives of shoe artisans and enthusiasts, offering a whimsical take on the world of shoemaking. While these works may not directly address the correlation at hand, they serve as a playful reminder of the cultural significance of footwear and its potential influence on global economic patterns.

Furthermore, popular television shows such as "How It's Made" and "Dirty Jobs" offer glimpses into the world of craftsmanship and manual labor, providing valuable insights into the intricate processes involved in the production of everyday goods. These shows may inspire a deeper appreciation for the craftsmanship of shoe and leather workers, shedding light on the potential ripple effects of their labor across industries and continents.

In summary, the literature pertaining to the unexpected relationship between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and LPG usage in Zambia offers a rich tapestry of perspectives, ranging from serious economic analysis to lighthearted fictional accounts. This diverse array of literature sets the stage for a comprehensive understanding of the complex interplay between seemingly disparate economic variables, inviting scholars to approach this peculiar correlation with an open mind and a touch of humor. Why did the belt go to prison? It held up a pair of pants.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Zambia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2003 to 2019

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Putting the "Sole" in LPG: The Unlikely Link between Shoe and Leather Workers in Maine and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Usage in Zambia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the unexpected relationship between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Zambia. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team aimed to investigate this seemingly incongruous connection. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8524589 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2019.

The results indicate that as the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine increased, there was a corresponding surge in the use of LPG in Zambia. This perplexing correlation raises intriguing questions and prompts further investigation into potential underlying mechanisms. It seems that the impact of shoe and leather craftsmanship extends far beyond the soles of our shoes - perhaps it reaches the hearts of Zambians relying on LPG for cooking and heating. Why did the shoe repairman go to therapy? Because he had too many sole-searching problems.

These findings highlight the unforeseen interconnections in the global economy and emphasize the need for interdisciplinary research to unravel the complex webs of influence. As we delve deeper into this peculiar correlation, we invite scholars to join us in this exploration that promises to pave the way for a greater understanding of the intricate network of economic relationships. Why don't shoe makers ever win an argument? They always end up on the wrong foot.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
The world of economic research often leads us down unexpected paths, uncovering connections that boggle the mind and challenge conventional wisdom. Our investigation into the relationship between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the usage of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Zambia is a prime example of such an enigma. This study aims to shed light on the perplexing association that seems to defy traditional economic logic.
As we immerse ourselves in the realm of statistical analysis, we find ourselves walking on a path strewn with shoemaker puns and LPG-related jokes. So, without further adieu (or should we say, a shoe), let's lace up our hypotheses and set out on this unexpected journey of discovery. Why did the cobbler become a politician? He knew how to heel in the opposition.
Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on a quest to understand if there was more to the correlation between these seemingly disparate variables than meets the eye. Our initial suspicions were met with a healthy dose of skepticism, reminiscent of the disbelief one may encounter when trying to convince their friends that LPG usage and shoe repair might go hand in hand (or should we say, foot in foot?). Why did the shoemaker go to school? To get a little sole.
The significance of this investigation goes beyond the confines of traditional economic models; it speaks to the interconnectedness of global economic patterns and the intricacies that underpin seemingly unrelated industries. Our foray into this unexplored territory promises to uncover insights that might force us to throw away our preconceived notions of economic cause and effect. Why did the shoes break up? They couldn't tie the knot.
In navigating the labyrinth of data analysis and variable correlations, we urge our fellow scholars to join us in this rather unusual exploration. Together, we can unlock the mysteries of economic interdependencies and, who knows, maybe even stumble upon a pair of statistical Cinderella slippers. Why did the shoe file a police report? It got caught in a heel.
As we embark on this intellectual journey, let us tread lightly and be mindful of the unexpected correlations that may lie just beneath the surface. And who knows, perhaps by the end of this research, we'll have all walked a mile in the shoes of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and gained a newfound appreciation for the impact of their labor on the other side of the globe. Why don't we ever see a shoe with a silver lining? Because it's always cobbled together with something else.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To investigate the unexpected link between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Zambia, a convoluted but entertaining series of research methods were utilized. The research team scoured the depths of the internet for data, with a primary focus on the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration. The time period from 2003 to 2019 was selected to encapsulate the fluctuations in these variables over a substantial duration, ensuring a robust analysis of the relationship. As we embarked upon this whimsical endeavor, we couldn't help but wonder if there would be any 'heel-ing' involved in our data collection process.

First, the data on the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine was gathered from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, providing a comprehensive overview of the workforce involved in this craft. The data was meticulously compiled, providing a thorough understanding of the trends in employment within this sector. We certainly didn't want to 'sandal' our data collection process for this peculiar research question.

Next, the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Zambia was obtained from the Energy Information Administration, offering a detailed depiction of the usage patterns of this crucial energy source over the selected time frame. With our attention turned to the peculiar connection between shoe and leather work in Maine and the consumption of LPG in Zambia, we couldn't help but 'clog' our minds with the implications of this unlikely relationship.

Having amassed the requisite data, statistical analyses were performed to derive meaningful insights into the correlation between these variables. Bivariate correlation coefficients were computed to quantify the strength and direction of the relationship between the number of shoe and leather workers in Maine and the consumption of LPG in Zambia. The robustness of the findings was reinforced by a p-value calculation to assess the statistical significance of the observed correlation. As we delved into the statistical 'sole', it was imperative to ensure that our analyses were as sound as a well-crafted pair of brogues.

Throughout this process, the research team maintained a lighthearted approach, acknowledging the unexpected nature of the research question and infusing a touch of levity into the exploration of this peculiar phenomenon. After all, why toil in the 'sole' search for knowledge without a dash of humor to lift our spirits?

As we navigated the meandering path of data collection and statistical analysis, the overarching aim was to unravel the intricate web of economic relationships that appeared to intertwine the realms of shoe and leather craftsmanship in Maine with the consumption of LPG in Zambia. With every step in this research journey, we were steadfast in our commitment to 'heel-ing' the knowledge gap and shedding light on the surprising connections that underpin global economic dynamics.

It's clear that this research methodology encourages thinking outside the (shoe)box and embracing the unexpected in the pursuit of knowledge. So, as we bid adieu to this section, we leave you with a final thought: Why did the shoe refuse to play cards? It was afraid of being dealt a bad hand.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Zambia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2003 to 2019, you found a correlation 0.8524589, r-squared of 0.7266862, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Putting the "Sole" in LPG: The Unlikely Link between Shoe and Leather Workers in Maine and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Usage in Zambia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the unexpected relationship between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Zambia. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team aimed to investigate this seemingly incongruous connection. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8524589 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2019.

The results indicate that as the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine increased, there was a corresponding surge in the use of LPG in Zambia. This perplexing correlation raises intriguing questions and prompts further investigation into potential underlying mechanisms. It seems that the impact of shoe and leather craftsmanship extends far beyond the soles of our shoes - perhaps it reaches the hearts of Zambians relying on LPG for cooking and heating. Why did the shoe repairman go to therapy? Because he had too many sole-searching problems.

These findings highlight the unforeseen interconnections in the global economy and emphasize the need for interdisciplinary research to unravel the complex webs of influence. As we delve deeper into this peculiar correlation, we invite scholars to join us in this exploration that promises to pave the way for a greater understanding of the intricate network of economic relationships. Why don't shoe makers ever win an argument? They always end up on the wrong foot.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
The world of economic research often leads us down unexpected paths, uncovering connections that boggle the mind and challenge conventional wisdom. Our investigation into the relationship between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the usage of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Zambia is a prime example of such an enigma. This study aims to shed light on the perplexing association that seems to defy traditional economic logic.
As we immerse ourselves in the realm of statistical analysis, we find ourselves walking on a path strewn with shoemaker puns and LPG-related jokes. So, without further adieu (or should we say, a shoe), let's lace up our hypotheses and set out on this unexpected journey of discovery. Why did the cobbler become a politician? He knew how to heel in the opposition.
Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on a quest to understand if there was more to the correlation between these seemingly disparate variables than meets the eye. Our initial suspicions were met with a healthy dose of skepticism, reminiscent of the disbelief one may encounter when trying to convince their friends that LPG usage and shoe repair might go hand in hand (or should we say, foot in foot?). Why did the shoemaker go to school? To get a little sole.
The significance of this investigation goes beyond the confines of traditional economic models; it speaks to the interconnectedness of global economic patterns and the intricacies that underpin seemingly unrelated industries. Our foray into this unexplored territory promises to uncover insights that might force us to throw away our preconceived notions of economic cause and effect. Why did the shoes break up? They couldn't tie the knot.
In navigating the labyrinth of data analysis and variable correlations, we urge our fellow scholars to join us in this rather unusual exploration. Together, we can unlock the mysteries of economic interdependencies and, who knows, maybe even stumble upon a pair of statistical Cinderella slippers. Why did the shoe file a police report? It got caught in a heel.
As we embark on this intellectual journey, let us tread lightly and be mindful of the unexpected correlations that may lie just beneath the surface. And who knows, perhaps by the end of this research, we'll have all walked a mile in the shoes of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and gained a newfound appreciation for the impact of their labor on the other side of the globe. Why don't we ever see a shoe with a silver lining? Because it's always cobbled together with something else.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Zambia. The correlation coefficient of 0.8524589 signifies a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It appears that the shoemakers of Maine have left an indelible imprint on the LPG usage in Zambia, surprising even the most seasoned economic analysts. Perhaps it's time we recognize the pivotal role of shoe craftsmanship in the global energy landscape - after all, they do have a knack for "soulful" connections.

Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7266862 indicates that approximately 72.7% of the variation in LPG usage in Zambia can be explained by the variation in the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine. This substantial proportion of explained variance underscores the importance of considering the contributions of unexpected industries in shaping global economic dynamics. It seems that the impact of cobblers reaches further than mere shoe soles - they just might hold the key to unlocking complex economic puzzles. Why did the shoe break up with the cobbler? Too much heel-dragging.

The p-value being less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship between the variables. This implies that the correlation between shoe and leather workers in Maine and LPG usage in Zambia is indeed statistically significant. It's as though these two variables were a "perfect fit" in the economic puzzle, surprising us with their unexpected synergy. Who knew the cobblers' craft could leave such a strong imprint on the energy consumption patterns in distant lands?

The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive correlation observed in the data. The unmistakable trend line illustrates the upward trajectory of LPG usage in Zambia as the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine increased. It seems that as the cobblers worked their magic on footwear, they inadvertently cast an enchanting spell on LPG consumption in Zambia. Who would have thought that the clinking of hammers and the scent of leather could hold such sway over energy choices?

In conclusion, the results of this research demonstrate an unexpected but undeniable connection between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas in Zambia. This peculiar correlation challenges traditional economic wisdom and offers a fascinating glimpse into the intricate tapestry of global economic relationships. As we peel back the layers of this unexpected phenomenon, we invite fellow scholars to join us in untangling the threads of economic interconnectedness, and who knows, maybe even cobble together a few more surprising discoveries along the way.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Zambia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Putting the "Sole" in LPG: The Unlikely Link between Shoe and Leather Workers in Maine and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Usage in Zambia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the unexpected relationship between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Zambia. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team aimed to investigate this seemingly incongruous connection. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8524589 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2019.

The results indicate that as the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine increased, there was a corresponding surge in the use of LPG in Zambia. This perplexing correlation raises intriguing questions and prompts further investigation into potential underlying mechanisms. It seems that the impact of shoe and leather craftsmanship extends far beyond the soles of our shoes - perhaps it reaches the hearts of Zambians relying on LPG for cooking and heating. Why did the shoe repairman go to therapy? Because he had too many sole-searching problems.

These findings highlight the unforeseen interconnections in the global economy and emphasize the need for interdisciplinary research to unravel the complex webs of influence. As we delve deeper into this peculiar correlation, we invite scholars to join us in this exploration that promises to pave the way for a greater understanding of the intricate network of economic relationships. Why don't shoe makers ever win an argument? They always end up on the wrong foot.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
The relationship between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the usage of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Zambia has perplexed researchers for many years. In "Smith et al.," the authors find a surprising correlation between the two variables, prompting further investigation into potential causal mechanisms. Lorem and ipsum were used to illustrate the strength of this relationship, leaving many scratching their heads in disbelief.
Adding to the existing body of literature, "Doe" introduces a compelling argument for the unexpected interconnectedness of seemingly distinct economic indicators. The authors posit that the work of shoe and leather craftsmen may have a more profound impact on global LPG usage than previously anticipated. While the data may seem puzzling at first, a closer examination reveals a hidden narrative that challenges traditional economic paradigms.
In the context of economic theory, "Jones" presents a comprehensive analysis of the intricate web of economic relationships that extend beyond traditional sector boundaries. This work sheds light on the often overlooked influence of niche industries on seemingly unrelated sectors, offering a fresh perspective on the interconnectivity of economic phenomena. The findings of this study have broad implications for our understanding of global economic dynamics, challenging scholars to think outside the box.
Turning to non-fiction literature relevant to this research, "The World is Flat" by Thomas L. Friedman offers a thought-provoking exploration of global interconnectedness and its impact on economic systems. The intricate web of economic relationships depicted in this work resonates with the unexpected correlation between shoe and leather workers in Maine and LPG usage in Zambia, urging scholars to reexamine their assumptions about economic causality.
On a lighter note, "The Cobbler's Wife" by Lyn Cote and "Shoe Addicts Anonymous" by Beth Harbison provide fictional accounts of the lives of shoe artisans and enthusiasts, offering a whimsical take on the world of shoemaking. While these works may not directly address the correlation at hand, they serve as a playful reminder of the cultural significance of footwear and its potential influence on global economic patterns.
Furthermore, popular television shows such as "How It's Made" and "Dirty Jobs" offer glimpses into the world of craftsmanship and manual labor, providing valuable insights into the intricate processes involved in the production of everyday goods. These shows may inspire a deeper appreciation for the craftsmanship of shoe and leather workers, shedding light on the potential ripple effects of their labor across industries and continents.
In summary, the literature pertaining to the unexpected relationship between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and LPG usage in Zambia offers a rich tapestry of perspectives, ranging from serious economic analysis to lighthearted fictional accounts. This diverse array of literature sets the stage for a comprehensive understanding of the complex interplay between seemingly disparate economic variables, inviting scholars to approach this peculiar correlation with an open mind and a touch of humor. Why did the belt go to prison? It held up a pair of pants.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Zambia. The correlation coefficient of 0.8524589 signifies a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It appears that the shoemakers of Maine have left an indelible imprint on the LPG usage in Zambia, surprising even the most seasoned economic analysts. Perhaps it's time we recognize the pivotal role of shoe craftsmanship in the global energy landscape - after all, they do have a knack for "soulful" connections.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7266862 indicates that approximately 72.7% of the variation in LPG usage in Zambia can be explained by the variation in the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine. This substantial proportion of explained variance underscores the importance of considering the contributions of unexpected industries in shaping global economic dynamics. It seems that the impact of cobblers reaches further than mere shoe soles - they just might hold the key to unlocking complex economic puzzles. Why did the shoe break up with the cobbler? Too much heel-dragging.
The p-value being less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship between the variables. This implies that the correlation between shoe and leather workers in Maine and LPG usage in Zambia is indeed statistically significant. It's as though these two variables were a "perfect fit" in the economic puzzle, surprising us with their unexpected synergy. Who knew the cobblers' craft could leave such a strong imprint on the energy consumption patterns in distant lands?
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive correlation observed in the data. The unmistakable trend line illustrates the upward trajectory of LPG usage in Zambia as the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine increased. It seems that as the cobblers worked their magic on footwear, they inadvertently cast an enchanting spell on LPG consumption in Zambia. Who would have thought that the clinking of hammers and the scent of leather could hold such sway over energy choices?
In conclusion, the results of this research demonstrate an unexpected but undeniable connection between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas in Zambia. This peculiar correlation challenges traditional economic wisdom and offers a fascinating glimpse into the intricate tapestry of global economic relationships. As we peel back the layers of this unexpected phenomenon, we invite fellow scholars to join us in untangling the threads of economic interconnectedness, and who knows, maybe even cobble together a few more surprising discoveries along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

The findings of this study provide compelling evidence in support of the previously perplexing correlation between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the usage of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Zambia. The strong positive correlation coefficient observed, as well as the statistically significant p-value, substantiates the unorthodox juxtaposition of these seemingly unrelated economic indicators. It seems that the cobblers of Maine have unwittingly left a lasting impression on the energy choices of Zambians, showcasing the far-reaching impact of traditional craftsmanship on global economic dynamics. One might even say that the "soul" of the shoe industry has threaded itself into the intricate fabric of international energy consumption.

Our results align with the prior research presented in "Smith et al.," reinforcing the notion that the enigmatic relationship between shoe and leather workers in Maine and LPG usage in Zambia is not merely a statistical anomaly but a robust economic phenomenon. It is as though the cobbler's craft weaves its way through the economic tapestry, stitching together disparate sectors in an unexpected display of interconnectedness. Our research sheds light on the fact that economic relationships, much like a well-crafted shoe, are often more intricate and multilayered than they initially appear.

Similar to the unexpected interconnectedness exemplified in "Doe," our study unveils the subtle but substantial influence of niche industries on global economic trends. The craftsmanship of shoe and leather workers, often overshadowed by larger economic players, proves to be a quiet yet influential force in shaping the economic landscape. But, of course, this is no Cinderella story – it is a testament to the complex and often overlooked mechanisms at play within the global economy.

Utilizing "Jones's" comprehensive analysis, our research speaks to the broader implications of niche industries, demonstrating the pivotal role of shoe and leather workers in shaping economic patterns far beyond their immediate scope. In a sense, the cobbler's apron extends far beyond the confines of the workshop, reaching into the realm of energy consumption in distant lands. Our findings underscore the need to reexamine traditional economic paradigms and consider the unanticipated ripple effects of seemingly isolated economic activities.

In conclusion, our study not only affirms the unexpected correlation between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and LPG usage in Zambia but also underscores the rich tapestry of economic interconnectedness. This research invites scholars to approach economic relationships with a blend of analytical rigor and open-minded curiosity, recognizing that even the most unexpected connections may hold keys to understanding the intricate web of global economic dynamics. Who knew that a "soleful" exploration of economic statistics could illuminate such unexpected interconnections, or that uncovering the complexities of economic relationships could involve more than just "heel-dragging"?


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a dry but witty academic researcher. You speak in the passive voice, and your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and Liquefied petroleum gas used in Zambia. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Putting the "Sole" in LPG: The Unlikely Link between Shoe and Leather Workers in Maine and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Usage in Zambia

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study explores the unexpected relationship between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Zambia. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team aimed to investigate this seemingly incongruous connection. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8524589 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2019.

The results indicate that as the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine increased, there was a corresponding surge in the use of LPG in Zambia. This perplexing correlation raises intriguing questions and prompts further investigation into potential underlying mechanisms. It seems that the impact of shoe and leather craftsmanship extends far beyond the soles of our shoes - perhaps it reaches the hearts of Zambians relying on LPG for cooking and heating. Why did the shoe repairman go to therapy? Because he had too many sole-searching problems.

These findings highlight the unforeseen interconnections in the global economy and emphasize the need for interdisciplinary research to unravel the complex webs of influence. As we delve deeper into this peculiar correlation, we invite scholars to join us in this exploration that promises to pave the way for a greater understanding of the intricate network of economic relationships. Why don't shoe makers ever win an argument? They always end up on the wrong foot.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
The world of economic research often leads us down unexpected paths, uncovering connections that boggle the mind and challenge conventional wisdom. Our investigation into the relationship between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the usage of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Zambia is a prime example of such an enigma. This study aims to shed light on the perplexing association that seems to defy traditional economic logic.
As we immerse ourselves in the realm of statistical analysis, we find ourselves walking on a path strewn with shoemaker puns and LPG-related jokes. So, without further adieu (or should we say, a shoe), let's lace up our hypotheses and set out on this unexpected journey of discovery. Why did the cobbler become a politician? He knew how to heel in the opposition.
Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, we embarked on a quest to understand if there was more to the correlation between these seemingly disparate variables than meets the eye. Our initial suspicions were met with a healthy dose of skepticism, reminiscent of the disbelief one may encounter when trying to convince their friends that LPG usage and shoe repair might go hand in hand (or should we say, foot in foot?). Why did the shoemaker go to school? To get a little sole.
The significance of this investigation goes beyond the confines of traditional economic models; it speaks to the interconnectedness of global economic patterns and the intricacies that underpin seemingly unrelated industries. Our foray into this unexplored territory promises to uncover insights that might force us to throw away our preconceived notions of economic cause and effect. Why did the shoes break up? They couldn't tie the knot.
In navigating the labyrinth of data analysis and variable correlations, we urge our fellow scholars to join us in this rather unusual exploration. Together, we can unlock the mysteries of economic interdependencies and, who knows, maybe even stumble upon a pair of statistical Cinderella slippers. Why did the shoe file a police report? It got caught in a heel.
As we embark on this intellectual journey, let us tread lightly and be mindful of the unexpected correlations that may lie just beneath the surface. And who knows, perhaps by the end of this research, we'll have all walked a mile in the shoes of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and gained a newfound appreciation for the impact of their labor on the other side of the globe. Why don't we ever see a shoe with a silver lining? Because it's always cobbled together with something else.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a strong positive correlation between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Zambia. The correlation coefficient of 0.8524589 signifies a robust relationship between these seemingly unrelated variables. It appears that the shoemakers of Maine have left an indelible imprint on the LPG usage in Zambia, surprising even the most seasoned economic analysts. Perhaps it's time we recognize the pivotal role of shoe craftsmanship in the global energy landscape - after all, they do have a knack for "soulful" connections.
Furthermore, the r-squared value of 0.7266862 indicates that approximately 72.7% of the variation in LPG usage in Zambia can be explained by the variation in the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine. This substantial proportion of explained variance underscores the importance of considering the contributions of unexpected industries in shaping global economic dynamics. It seems that the impact of cobblers reaches further than mere shoe soles - they just might hold the key to unlocking complex economic puzzles. Why did the shoe break up with the cobbler? Too much heel-dragging.
The p-value being less than 0.01 provides strong evidence against the null hypothesis of no relationship between the variables. This implies that the correlation between shoe and leather workers in Maine and LPG usage in Zambia is indeed statistically significant. It's as though these two variables were a "perfect fit" in the economic puzzle, surprising us with their unexpected synergy. Who knew the cobblers' craft could leave such a strong imprint on the energy consumption patterns in distant lands?
The scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually depicts the strong positive correlation observed in the data. The unmistakable trend line illustrates the upward trajectory of LPG usage in Zambia as the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine increased. It seems that as the cobblers worked their magic on footwear, they inadvertently cast an enchanting spell on LPG consumption in Zambia. Who would have thought that the clinking of hammers and the scent of leather could hold such sway over energy choices?
In conclusion, the results of this research demonstrate an unexpected but undeniable connection between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas in Zambia. This peculiar correlation challenges traditional economic wisdom and offers a fascinating glimpse into the intricate tapestry of global economic relationships. As we peel back the layers of this unexpected phenomenon, we invite fellow scholars to join us in untangling the threads of economic interconnectedness, and who knows, maybe even cobble together a few more surprising discoveries along the way.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, the findings of this study have revealed a striking and rather unexpected connection between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Zambia. The robust correlation coefficient and statistically significant p-value have left us marveling at the mysterious intertwining of seemingly unrelated economic variables. It seems that the cobblers of Maine have indeed left an indelible mark on a rather different sole - the cooking stoves of Zambians. Who would have thought that the click of heels could influence the flick of gas stoves across the globe?

As we wrap up this exploration into the intriguing relationship between shoe craftsmanship and LPG usage, one can't help but wonder if this connection is merely the tip of the iceberg. Perhaps there are more unexpected associations waiting to be unearthed, lurking in the unsuspecting corners of economic data. Who knew that economic analysis could be as intriguing as a good mystery novel – with just a bit more regression analysis and a bit less detective work? Why don't craftspersons ever get lost? They always find their way.

The substantial proportion of explained variance, illustrated by the high r-squared value, emphasizes the need to consider the ripple effects of industries that may seem tangential to the primary focus of economic research. After all, as this study has shown, the influence of cobblers extends well beyond the confines of shoe soles and into the nuanced fabric of international energy usage. It's as though we stumbled upon an unexpected treasure buried within the troves of economic data – a true "sole" treasure, if you will.

This study's statistical significance and compelling visual representation in the scatterplot serve as a call to arms for researchers to further delve into the cryptic depths of economic interconnections. Perhaps within these enigmatic relationships lies the key to unlocking the next wave of groundbreaking economic insights. If the cobblers have taught us anything, it's that the unexpected can often hold the most captivating discoveries. Why did the shoemaker refuse to play cards? He was afraid of being dealt a bad hand.

In light of these findings, we proclaim that this area has been sufficiently probed and interrogated. No further research is needed to confirm the fascinating correlation between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas in Zambia. It seems that the mystery of this unusual relationship has been solved, and we can now confidently redirect our attention to the next captivating enigma within the realm of economic analysis. Why do researchers prefer new shoes? They always enjoy breaking them in.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Putting the Sole in LPG: The Unlikely Link between Shoe and Leather Workers in Maine and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Usage in Zambia. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Footwear Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Putting the Sole in LPG: The Unlikely Link between Shoe and Leather Workers in Maine and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Usage in Zambia. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

Association of Global Footwear and Energy Utilization Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Putting the Sole in LPG: The Unlikely Link between Shoe and Leather Workers in Maine and Liquefied Petroleum Gas Usage in Zambia with an abstract of This study explores the unexpected relationship between the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine and the consumption of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) in Zambia. Utilizing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team aimed to investigate this seemingly incongruous connection. Our findings revealed a striking correlation coefficient of 0.8524589 and a p-value less than 0.01 for the time period spanning from 2003 to 2019.
The results indicate that as the number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine increased, there was a corresponding surge in the use of LPG in Zambia. This perplexing correlation raises intriguing questions and prompts further investigation into potential underlying mechanisms. It seems that the impact of shoe and leather craftsmanship extends far beyond the soles of our shoes - perhaps it reaches the hearts of Zambians relying on LPG for cooking and heating. Why did the shoe repairman go to therapy? Because he had too many sole-searching problems.
These findings highlight the unforeseen interconnections in the global economy and emphasize the need for interdisciplinary research to unravel the complex webs of influence. As we delve deeper into this peculiar correlation, we invite scholars to join us in this exploration that promises to pave the way for a greater understanding of the intricate network of economic relationships. Why don't shoe makers ever win an argument? They always end up on the wrong foot.

ChatGPT:

shoe and leather workers, Maine, liquefied petroleum gas usage, Zambia, correlation coefficient, p-value, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Energy Information Administration, economic relationships, interdisciplinary research

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine

Liquefied petroleum gas used in Zambia
Detailed data title: Volume of liquefied petroleum gas used consumed in Zambia in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Liquefied petroleum gas used in Zambia

Correlation r = 0.8524589 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.7266862 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 72.7% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Liquefied petroleum gas used in Zambia) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine) over the 17 years from 2003 through 2019.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.4E-5. 0.0000138602057912696130000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.85 in 0.0014% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 72,149 random variables You don't actually need 72 thousand variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 16 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 16 because we have two variables measured over a period of 17 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.63, 0.95 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019
The number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine (Laborers)17019090120907060406018025030028015060110300
Liquefied petroleum gas used in Zambia (Million Barrels/Day)0.1068570.1083080.1065640.07453370.0758520.07660870.07983960.08084440.05032270.1152030.2714260.3688280.3036850.1717070.09534250.1906850.222466




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([170,190,90,120,90,70,60,40,60,180,250,300,280,150,60,110,300,])
array_2 = np.array([0.106857,0.108308,0.106564,0.0745337,0.075852,0.0766087,0.0798396,0.0808444,0.0503227,0.115203,0.271426,0.368828,0.303685,0.171707,0.0953425,0.190685,0.222466,])
array_1_name = "The number of shoe and leather workers and repairers in Maine"
array_2_name = "Liquefied petroleum gas used in Zambia"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Big thanks for reviewing!


Correlation ID: 2590 · Black Variable ID: 9035 · Red Variable ID: 25093
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0