about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,579 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is The number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and the second variable is Jet fuel used in Brazil.  The chart goes from 2006 to 2021, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

More transportation inspectors in Delaware meant smoother traffic flow, leading to quicker transport of jet fuel from Delaware to Brazilian airports. This improved 'inspector of the fuel' efficiency, ultimately fueling the demand for jet fuel in Brazil!

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: Prompt: [ A scene from Skyrim ] depicting this scene: In the bustling city of Whiterun, a group of adventurers are seen preparing to embark on a journey. They are loading their belongings onto a majestic dragon, ready to take flight. Meanwhile, in the ancient city of Solitude, scores of dragon-riders are lining up to have their mount refueled with magical energy, drawing upon the mystical reserves of the land. The scene captures the interconnection between the departing adventurers and the growing demand for magical energy in Solitude due to the scarcity of dragon-riders in Whiterun. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: The number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and Jet fuel used in Brazil. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: 3D Pixar Style Celtic art a funny image you would see on reddit Minimalism A scene from Skyrim
ChatGPT: A scene from Skyrim

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both The number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and Jet fuel used in Brazil, in the following situation: The inspectors were jetting off to new job opportunities, leaving a plane shortage in Delaware. This led to Brazilian airlines fueling the demand, literally, for more jet fuel. It's a classic case of plane and simple - fewer inspectors in Delaware took the air out of the transportation industry, causing a turbulence that reached all the way to Brazil!. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In Delaware, a few transportation inspectors are seen boarding a jet with their luggage, ready to jet off. Meanwhile, in Brazil, a line of airplanes is being fueled up at the airport, with large tanks of jet fuel being pumped into their wings. The scene captures the connection between the departing inspectors and the increasing demand for jet fuel in Brazil due to the shortage of planes in Delaware.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ A scene from Skyrim ] and depicting this scene: In Delaware, a few transportation inspectors are seen boarding a jet with their luggage, ready to jet off. Meanwhile, in Brazil, a line of airplanes is being fueled up at the airport, with large tanks of jet fuel being pumped into their wings. The scene captures the connection between the departing inspectors and the increasing demand for jet fuel in Brazil due to the shortage of planes in Delaware. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: Prompt: [ A scene from Skyrim ] depicting this scene: In the bustling city of Whiterun, a group of adventurers are seen preparing to embark on a journey. They are loading their belongings onto a majestic dragon, ready to take flight. Meanwhile, in the ancient city of Solitude, scores of dragon-riders are lining up to have their mount refueled with magical energy, drawing upon the mystical reserves of the land. The scene captures the interconnection between the departing adventurers and the growing demand for magical energy in Solitude due to the scarcity of dragon-riders in Whiterun.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how increases in The number of transportation inspectors in Delaware positively influenced Jet fuel used in Brazil. Include one good pun.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Inspecting the Fuelish: Exploring the Relationship Between Transportation Inspectors in Delaware and Jet Fuel Consumption in Brazil

The Journal of Transcontinental Transportation Studies

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and Jet fuel used in Brazil. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, make it sound serious.

Your research team used data from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.8279861 and p < 0.01 for 2006 to 2021.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
"Inspecting the Fuelish: Exploring the Relationship Between Transportation Inspectors in Delaware and Jet Fuel Consumption in Brazil"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing and unexpected link between the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and the consumption of jet fuel in Brazil. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 2006 to 2021. Through our investigation, we uncovered a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8279861, with a p-value of less than 0.01, establishing a significant statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings shed light on a curious connection that has long remained overlooked and offer thought-provoking implications for both the transportation industry and fuel consumption patterns. While our exploration may at first glance appear whimsical, its implications are anything but flighty, providing a broader perspective on the interplay of factors influencing global fuel dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and Jet fuel used in Brazil. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Inspecting the Fuelish: Exploring the Relationship Between Transportation Inspectors in Delaware and Jet Fuel Consumption in Brazil"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing and unexpected link between the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and the consumption of jet fuel in Brazil. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 2006 to 2021. Through our investigation, we uncovered a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8279861, with a p-value of less than 0.01, establishing a significant statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings shed light on a curious connection that has long remained overlooked and offer thought-provoking implications for both the transportation industry and fuel consumption patterns. While our exploration may at first glance appear whimsical, its implications are anything but flighty, providing a broader perspective on the interplay of factors influencing global fuel dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

Transportation inspectors and jet fuel, two seemingly unrelated entities, have been brought together in a whimsical waltz of statistical correlation in the present study. While it may seem as unusual as mixing oil and water, our research has unearthed a surprising bond between these seemingly clandestine variables. Our investigation has taken flight into uncharted statistical territory, guided by the navigational instruments of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration. As we buckle up for this scholarly expedition, we aim to decode the confounding relationship between the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and the jet fuel consumed in the vibrant land of Brazil.

In the world of statistical analysis, uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.8279861 between two seemingly unrelated variables is as rare as finding a four-leaf clover in a field of data sets. And as if that wasn't enough, our p-value of less than 0.01 lends an air of statistical significance to this peculiar association. Our findings have landed on a runway of statistical significance, offering sunshine and rays of understanding to illuminate this unconventional connection.

It is often said that truth is stranger than fiction, and in the world of research, we have discovered that plausible relationships can sometimes be lurking beneath the surface, waiting for their moment of revelation. So, fuel up your curiosity, fasten your seatbelts, and join us on this surprising scientific journey as we unravel the enigmatic ties between transportation inspectors in Delaware and the consumption of jet fuel in Brazil. While this exploration may seem like an academic flight of fancy, its implications are poised to challenge existing paradigms and offer new perspectives on the intricate web of global fuel dynamics.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and Jet fuel used in Brazil. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name some movies that you watched that are tangentially related to the topic.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Inspecting the Fuelish: Exploring the Relationship Between Transportation Inspectors in Delaware and Jet Fuel Consumption in Brazil"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing and unexpected link between the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and the consumption of jet fuel in Brazil. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 2006 to 2021. Through our investigation, we uncovered a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8279861, with a p-value of less than 0.01, establishing a significant statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings shed light on a curious connection that has long remained overlooked and offer thought-provoking implications for both the transportation industry and fuel consumption patterns. While our exploration may at first glance appear whimsical, its implications are anything but flighty, providing a broader perspective on the interplay of factors influencing global fuel dynamics.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
Transportation inspectors and jet fuel, two seemingly unrelated entities, have been brought together in a whimsical waltz of statistical correlation in the present study. While it may seem as unusual as mixing oil and water, our research has unearthed a surprising bond between these seemingly clandestine variables. Our investigation has taken flight into uncharted statistical territory, guided by the navigational instruments of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration. As we buckle up for this scholarly expedition, we aim to decode the confounding relationship between the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and the jet fuel consumed in the vibrant land of Brazil.
In the world of statistical analysis, uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.8279861 between two seemingly unrelated variables is as rare as finding a four-leaf clover in a field of data sets. And as if that wasn't enough, our p-value of less than 0.01 lends an air of statistical significance to this peculiar association. Our findings have landed on a runway of statistical significance, offering sunshine and rays of understanding to illuminate this unconventional connection.
It is often said that truth is stranger than fiction, and in the world of research, we have discovered that plausible relationships can sometimes be lurking beneath the surface, waiting for their moment of revelation. So, fuel up your curiosity, fasten your seatbelts, and join us on this surprising scientific journey as we unravel the enigmatic ties between transportation inspectors in Delaware and the consumption of jet fuel in Brazil. While this exploration may seem like an academic flight of fancy, its implications are poised to challenge existing paradigms and offer new perspectives on the intricate web of global fuel dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

In their study, Smith and Doe (2015) examine the impact of transportation inspectors on fuel consumption, focusing on various states in the United States. Their findings indicate a positive correlation between the number of transportation inspectors and fuel usage, providing an initial glimpse into the intricate relationship we are investigating.

Jones (2017) delves into the nuances of fuel consumption patterns in Brazil, shedding light on the complex factors influencing jet fuel demand in this region. This scholarly work lays the groundwork for our exploration of the curious connection between transportation inspectors in Delaware and jet fuel consumption in Brazil.

Expanding beyond the realm of academic literature, "The Economics of Transportation Inspectors" (Book, 2019) by A. Researcher offers a comprehensive analysis of the role of transportation inspectors in shaping fuel usage patterns. Additionally, "Jetting Around the World: A Study of Global Fuel Consumption" (Book, 2020) by B. Scholar provides valuable insights into the broader dynamics of jet fuel consumption, indirectly informing our investigation.

While not directly related to our subject matter, the fictional works "The Inspector Chronicles" (Fiction Book, 2018) and "Fueling the Fire: A Jet-Setting Adventure" (Fiction Book, 2019) offer imaginative tales that mirror the whimsical nature of our unexpected research endeavor. These fictional works, albeit unrelated to scholarly inquiry, add a touch of levity to our exploration.

On a tangential note, the movies "Up in the Air" (Movie, 2009) and "Planes, Trains, and Automobiles" (Movie, 1987) provide entertaining glimpses into the world of transportation and fuel consumption. While these films offer no direct empirical support for our study, they serve as playful reminders of the broader cultural significance of the topics at hand.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and Jet fuel used in Brazil. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration . You used data from 2006 to 2021

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Inspecting the Fuelish: Exploring the Relationship Between Transportation Inspectors in Delaware and Jet Fuel Consumption in Brazil"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing and unexpected link between the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and the consumption of jet fuel in Brazil. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 2006 to 2021. Through our investigation, we uncovered a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8279861, with a p-value of less than 0.01, establishing a significant statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings shed light on a curious connection that has long remained overlooked and offer thought-provoking implications for both the transportation industry and fuel consumption patterns. While our exploration may at first glance appear whimsical, its implications are anything but flighty, providing a broader perspective on the interplay of factors influencing global fuel dynamics.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
Transportation inspectors and jet fuel, two seemingly unrelated entities, have been brought together in a whimsical waltz of statistical correlation in the present study. While it may seem as unusual as mixing oil and water, our research has unearthed a surprising bond between these seemingly clandestine variables. Our investigation has taken flight into uncharted statistical territory, guided by the navigational instruments of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration. As we buckle up for this scholarly expedition, we aim to decode the confounding relationship between the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and the jet fuel consumed in the vibrant land of Brazil.
In the world of statistical analysis, uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.8279861 between two seemingly unrelated variables is as rare as finding a four-leaf clover in a field of data sets. And as if that wasn't enough, our p-value of less than 0.01 lends an air of statistical significance to this peculiar association. Our findings have landed on a runway of statistical significance, offering sunshine and rays of understanding to illuminate this unconventional connection.
It is often said that truth is stranger than fiction, and in the world of research, we have discovered that plausible relationships can sometimes be lurking beneath the surface, waiting for their moment of revelation. So, fuel up your curiosity, fasten your seatbelts, and join us on this surprising scientific journey as we unravel the enigmatic ties between transportation inspectors in Delaware and the consumption of jet fuel in Brazil. While this exploration may seem like an academic flight of fancy, its implications are poised to challenge existing paradigms and offer new perspectives on the intricate web of global fuel dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

In this research, we employed a data-driven approach to unravel the intriguing connection between the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and the jet fuel consumption in Brazil. Our methodology amalgamated data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, creating a brew of statistical analysis that seeped into the depths of this serendipitous relationship.

To quantify the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware, we scavenged the Bureau of Labor Statistics archives, sifting through the employment data with a diligence akin to a treasure hunter on a quest for statistical gems. Our data extraction process involved extracting employment figures for transportation inspectors, a task mirroring the precision required to separate wheat from chaff in a bountiful crop of statistical information.

Conversely, to ascertain the jet fuel consumption in Brazil, we delved into the depths of the Energy Information Administration’s data reservoir, navigating through a sea of energy statistics akin to skilled sailors charting unexplored waters. Our team meticulously distilled the jet fuel consumption figures, much like alchemists extracting the essence of statistical chronicles.

With the data in hand, we employed robust statistical analyses, including but not limited to correlation analysis, regression modeling, and time series analysis. The arduous process of transforming raw data into meaningful statistical nuggets involved a level of scrutiny that would put Sherlock Holmes to shame.

Moreover, we utilized advanced statistical software such as SPSS and R, acting as our trusty companions on this voyage of data exploration. Our research team also employed meticulous quality control measures to ensure the integrity of the data and the reliability of our findings, akin to the vigilant guardians safeguarding the sanctity of scholarly knowledge.

In hindsight, the journey from data procurement to statistical analyses provided moments of both triumph and tribulation, resembling a rollercoaster of statistical discovery that would make even the bravest of researchers exclaim, "What a ride!"

Through this methodological concoction, we endeavored to shine a light on the wondrous bond between transportation inspectors in Delaware and the quenchless demand for jet fuel in Brazil. In the words of Charles Darwin, "It is not the strongest of the species that survives, nor the most intelligent. It is the one most adaptable to change," and in a similar vein, our methodology embodied a spirit of adaptability as we navigated the uncharted statistical terrain to uncover this unexpected correlation.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and Jet fuel used in Brazil. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from Bureau of Larbor Statistics and Energy Information Administration .

For the time period 2006 to 2021, you found a correlation 0.8279861, r-squared of 0.6855610, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
"Inspecting the Fuelish: Exploring the Relationship Between Transportation Inspectors in Delaware and Jet Fuel Consumption in Brazil"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing and unexpected link between the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and the consumption of jet fuel in Brazil. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 2006 to 2021. Through our investigation, we uncovered a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8279861, with a p-value of less than 0.01, establishing a significant statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings shed light on a curious connection that has long remained overlooked and offer thought-provoking implications for both the transportation industry and fuel consumption patterns. While our exploration may at first glance appear whimsical, its implications are anything but flighty, providing a broader perspective on the interplay of factors influencing global fuel dynamics.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
Transportation inspectors and jet fuel, two seemingly unrelated entities, have been brought together in a whimsical waltz of statistical correlation in the present study. While it may seem as unusual as mixing oil and water, our research has unearthed a surprising bond between these seemingly clandestine variables. Our investigation has taken flight into uncharted statistical territory, guided by the navigational instruments of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration. As we buckle up for this scholarly expedition, we aim to decode the confounding relationship between the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and the jet fuel consumed in the vibrant land of Brazil.
In the world of statistical analysis, uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.8279861 between two seemingly unrelated variables is as rare as finding a four-leaf clover in a field of data sets. And as if that wasn't enough, our p-value of less than 0.01 lends an air of statistical significance to this peculiar association. Our findings have landed on a runway of statistical significance, offering sunshine and rays of understanding to illuminate this unconventional connection.
It is often said that truth is stranger than fiction, and in the world of research, we have discovered that plausible relationships can sometimes be lurking beneath the surface, waiting for their moment of revelation. So, fuel up your curiosity, fasten your seatbelts, and join us on this surprising scientific journey as we unravel the enigmatic ties between transportation inspectors in Delaware and the consumption of jet fuel in Brazil. While this exploration may seem like an academic flight of fancy, its implications are poised to challenge existing paradigms and offer new perspectives on the intricate web of global fuel dynamics.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The analysis of the data revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8279861, indicating a strong positive relationship between the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and the consumption of jet fuel in Brazil. This eyebrow-raising correlation suggests that as the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware increased, so did the consumption of jet fuel in Brazil, leaving us pondering the unexpected connections in the tapestry of transportation and fuel dynamics.

Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.6855610 implies that approximately 68.56% of the variance in jet fuel consumption in Brazil can be explained by the variation in the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware. This finding illuminates the substantial influence exerted by the bustling activity of transportation inspectors on the jet fuel landscape of Brazil.

The significance of this association was bolstered by a p-value of less than 0.01, affirming the reliability and robustness of our statistical conclusions. With a p-value that small, it seems our results were as statistically significant as a rare unicorn sighting in the world of data analysis.

To visually illustrate the strength of this unexpected relationship, we graphed the data in a scatterplot (see Fig. 1). The figure provides an illuminating snapshot of the powerful positive correlation observed between the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and jet fuel consumption in Brazil, serving as a visual testament to this surprising statistical revelation.

In conclusion, our findings highlight the captivating interplay between seemingly distant variables, offering a fresh perspective that transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries. As we wrap up this exploration, it is clear that there is much more to the story of transportation inspectors and jet fuel consumption than meets the eye. This discovery invites us to embrace the delightful unpredictability of science and encourages us to remain open to the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of statistical analysis.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and Jet fuel used in Brazil. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
"Inspecting the Fuelish: Exploring the Relationship Between Transportation Inspectors in Delaware and Jet Fuel Consumption in Brazil"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing and unexpected link between the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and the consumption of jet fuel in Brazil. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 2006 to 2021. Through our investigation, we uncovered a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8279861, with a p-value of less than 0.01, establishing a significant statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings shed light on a curious connection that has long remained overlooked and offer thought-provoking implications for both the transportation industry and fuel consumption patterns. While our exploration may at first glance appear whimsical, its implications are anything but flighty, providing a broader perspective on the interplay of factors influencing global fuel dynamics.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
In their study, Smith and Doe (2015) examine the impact of transportation inspectors on fuel consumption, focusing on various states in the United States. Their findings indicate a positive correlation between the number of transportation inspectors and fuel usage, providing an initial glimpse into the intricate relationship we are investigating.
Jones (2017) delves into the nuances of fuel consumption patterns in Brazil, shedding light on the complex factors influencing jet fuel demand in this region. This scholarly work lays the groundwork for our exploration of the curious connection between transportation inspectors in Delaware and jet fuel consumption in Brazil.
Expanding beyond the realm of academic literature, "The Economics of Transportation Inspectors" (Book, 2019) by A. Researcher offers a comprehensive analysis of the role of transportation inspectors in shaping fuel usage patterns. Additionally, "Jetting Around the World: A Study of Global Fuel Consumption" (Book, 2020) by B. Scholar provides valuable insights into the broader dynamics of jet fuel consumption, indirectly informing our investigation.
While not directly related to our subject matter, the fictional works "The Inspector Chronicles" (Fiction Book, 2018) and "Fueling the Fire: A Jet-Setting Adventure" (Fiction Book, 2019) offer imaginative tales that mirror the whimsical nature of our unexpected research endeavor. These fictional works, albeit unrelated to scholarly inquiry, add a touch of levity to our exploration.
On a tangential note, the movies "Up in the Air" (Movie, 2009) and "Planes, Trains, and Automobiles" (Movie, 1987) provide entertaining glimpses into the world of transportation and fuel consumption. While these films offer no direct empirical support for our study, they serve as playful reminders of the broader cultural significance of the topics at hand.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8279861, indicating a strong positive relationship between the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and the consumption of jet fuel in Brazil. This eyebrow-raising correlation suggests that as the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware increased, so did the consumption of jet fuel in Brazil, leaving us pondering the unexpected connections in the tapestry of transportation and fuel dynamics.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.6855610 implies that approximately 68.56% of the variance in jet fuel consumption in Brazil can be explained by the variation in the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware. This finding illuminates the substantial influence exerted by the bustling activity of transportation inspectors on the jet fuel landscape of Brazil.
The significance of this association was bolstered by a p-value of less than 0.01, affirming the reliability and robustness of our statistical conclusions. With a p-value that small, it seems our results were as statistically significant as a rare unicorn sighting in the world of data analysis.
To visually illustrate the strength of this unexpected relationship, we graphed the data in a scatterplot (see Fig. 1). The figure provides an illuminating snapshot of the powerful positive correlation observed between the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and jet fuel consumption in Brazil, serving as a visual testament to this surprising statistical revelation.
In conclusion, our findings highlight the captivating interplay between seemingly distant variables, offering a fresh perspective that transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries. As we wrap up this exploration, it is clear that there is much more to the story of transportation inspectors and jet fuel consumption than meets the eye. This discovery invites us to embrace the delightful unpredictability of science and encourages us to remain open to the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our investigation has uncovered a compelling relationship between the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and jet fuel consumption in Brazil, lending credence to the humorous adage, "Where there's fuel, there's a way." Our results bolster the findings of Smith and Doe (2015), providing empirical support for the notion that transportation inspectors play a pivotal role in fuel dynamics. The strong positive correlation we have identified echoes Jones' (2017) insights into the multifaceted factors shaping jet fuel demand, illustrating how the whimsical world of transportation inspection intertwines with the serious business of fuel consumption.

While at first glance, the connection between Delaware inspectors and Brazilian jet fuel may seem as unlikely as a penguin in the Amazon, our data paints a different picture. The coefficient of determination, akin to the Sherlock Holmes of statistical measures, reveals the startling extent to which the variance in jet fuel consumption can be traced back to the activity of transportation inspectors. Like a hidden treasure revealed by a map, our scatterplot (Fig. 1) visually captures the robustness of this association, immersing us in the captivating dance of data points that tell a tale of their own.

One might be tempted to dismiss our findings as far-fetched as a unicorn sighting, but the p-value of less than 0.01 firmly puts such skepticism to rest. Our results are as statistically significant as a well-timed punchline in a room full of academics, leaving little room for doubt about the depth of the link we have unearthed.

In closing, our whimsical journey into the interwoven realms of transportation inspection and jet fuel consumption reinforces the notion that in the labyrinthine world of statistics, unexpected connections await those who dare to venture beyond the beaten path. As we bid adieu to the captivating saga of inspectors and jet fuel, our study stands as a testament to the delightful unpredictability of science and a playful nod to the serendipitous discoveries that await the curious and the bold.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a silly researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between The number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and Jet fuel used in Brazil. Make it seem dry like academic research paper, but with lots of subtle hidden offhand remarks, jokes, goofy observations, and puns. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
"Inspecting the Fuelish: Exploring the Relationship Between Transportation Inspectors in Delaware and Jet Fuel Consumption in Brazil"

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the intriguing and unexpected link between the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and the consumption of jet fuel in Brazil. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 2006 to 2021. Through our investigation, we uncovered a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8279861, with a p-value of less than 0.01, establishing a significant statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings shed light on a curious connection that has long remained overlooked and offer thought-provoking implications for both the transportation industry and fuel consumption patterns. While our exploration may at first glance appear whimsical, its implications are anything but flighty, providing a broader perspective on the interplay of factors influencing global fuel dynamics.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
Transportation inspectors and jet fuel, two seemingly unrelated entities, have been brought together in a whimsical waltz of statistical correlation in the present study. While it may seem as unusual as mixing oil and water, our research has unearthed a surprising bond between these seemingly clandestine variables. Our investigation has taken flight into uncharted statistical territory, guided by the navigational instruments of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration. As we buckle up for this scholarly expedition, we aim to decode the confounding relationship between the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and the jet fuel consumed in the vibrant land of Brazil.
In the world of statistical analysis, uncovering a correlation coefficient of 0.8279861 between two seemingly unrelated variables is as rare as finding a four-leaf clover in a field of data sets. And as if that wasn't enough, our p-value of less than 0.01 lends an air of statistical significance to this peculiar association. Our findings have landed on a runway of statistical significance, offering sunshine and rays of understanding to illuminate this unconventional connection.
It is often said that truth is stranger than fiction, and in the world of research, we have discovered that plausible relationships can sometimes be lurking beneath the surface, waiting for their moment of revelation. So, fuel up your curiosity, fasten your seatbelts, and join us on this surprising scientific journey as we unravel the enigmatic ties between transportation inspectors in Delaware and the consumption of jet fuel in Brazil. While this exploration may seem like an academic flight of fancy, its implications are poised to challenge existing paradigms and offer new perspectives on the intricate web of global fuel dynamics.

[[RESULTS]]
The analysis of the data revealed a correlation coefficient of 0.8279861, indicating a strong positive relationship between the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and the consumption of jet fuel in Brazil. This eyebrow-raising correlation suggests that as the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware increased, so did the consumption of jet fuel in Brazil, leaving us pondering the unexpected connections in the tapestry of transportation and fuel dynamics.
Furthermore, the coefficient of determination (r-squared) of 0.6855610 implies that approximately 68.56% of the variance in jet fuel consumption in Brazil can be explained by the variation in the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware. This finding illuminates the substantial influence exerted by the bustling activity of transportation inspectors on the jet fuel landscape of Brazil.
The significance of this association was bolstered by a p-value of less than 0.01, affirming the reliability and robustness of our statistical conclusions. With a p-value that small, it seems our results were as statistically significant as a rare unicorn sighting in the world of data analysis.
To visually illustrate the strength of this unexpected relationship, we graphed the data in a scatterplot (see Fig. 1). The figure provides an illuminating snapshot of the powerful positive correlation observed between the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and jet fuel consumption in Brazil, serving as a visual testament to this surprising statistical revelation.
In conclusion, our findings highlight the captivating interplay between seemingly distant variables, offering a fresh perspective that transcends traditional disciplinary boundaries. As we wrap up this exploration, it is clear that there is much more to the story of transportation inspectors and jet fuel consumption than meets the eye. This discovery invites us to embrace the delightful unpredictability of science and encourages us to remain open to the unexpected connections that lie beneath the surface of statistical analysis.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our research has soared to new heights in uncovering the captivating relationship between transportation inspectors in Delaware and jet fuel consumption in Brazil. The statistically significant correlation coefficient of 0.8279861 has left us not only scratching our heads in wonder but also fueling our excitement for uncovering such a curious connection. The coefficient of determination of 0.6855610 has shed light on the substantial influence of these inspectors, almost as if they were conducting their own version of "jet fueling."

Our findings have provided a window into a previously unexplored realm of statistical inquiry, emphasizing the unexpected connections that can emerge when delving into the complex tapestry of transportation and fuel dynamics. It appears that the "road" to understanding jet fuel consumption in Brazil may indeed pass through the highways and byways of Delaware. This is a revelation that will surely spark many more "fuelish" puns in the hallowed halls of statistical circles.

As much as our exploration may seem whimsical, the implications are far from flighty. However, as entertaining as this journey has been, it seems our research has reached its final destination. It appears there is no need for further research on the peculiar association between transportation inspectors in Delaware and the consumption of jet fuel in Brazil.

In the world of statistical analysis, some mysteries may be best left unsolved, or perhaps the correlation will simply fuel further speculation. In any case, our findings have illuminated a fascinating intersection between seemingly disparate variables, leaving us to marvel at the unpredictable and enchanting nature of statistical relationships.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Inspecting the Fuelish: Exploring the Relationship Between Transportation Inspectors in Delaware and Jet Fuel Consumption in Brazil. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Journal of Transcontinental Transportation Studies


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Inspecting the Fuelish: Exploring the Relationship Between Transportation Inspectors in Delaware and Jet Fuel Consumption in Brazil. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Ecological Transportation and Fuel Consumption Research Institute


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Inspecting the Fuelish: Exploring the Relationship Between Transportation Inspectors in Delaware and Jet Fuel Consumption in Brazil with an abstract of This study delves into the intriguing and unexpected link between the number of transportation inspectors in Delaware and the consumption of jet fuel in Brazil. Drawing on data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics and the Energy Information Administration, our research team conducted a thorough analysis spanning the years 2006 to 2021. Through our investigation, we uncovered a noteworthy correlation coefficient of 0.8279861, with a p-value of less than 0.01, establishing a significant statistical relationship between these seemingly disparate variables. Our findings shed light on a curious connection that has long remained overlooked and offer thought-provoking implications for both the transportation industry and fuel consumption patterns. While our exploration may at first glance appear whimsical, its implications are anything but flighty, providing a broader perspective on the interplay of factors influencing global fuel dynamics.

ChatGPT:

transportation inspectors, Delaware, jet fuel consumption, Brazil, correlation coefficient, statistical relationship, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Energy Information Administration, fuel consumption patterns, global fuel dynamics

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

The number of transportation inspectors in Delaware
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of transportation inspectors in Delaware
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of transportation inspectors in Delaware

Jet fuel used in Brazil
Detailed data title: Volume of jet fuel used consumed in Brazil in millions of barrels per day
Source: Energy Information Administration
See what else correlates with Jet fuel used in Brazil

Correlation r = 0.8279861 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.6855610 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 68.6% of the change in the one variable (i.e., Jet fuel used in Brazil) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., The number of transportation inspectors in Delaware) over the 16 years from 2006 through 2021.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 7.5E-5. 0.0000748355656596387600000000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.83 in 0.0075% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 13,363 random variables Which I absolutely did.
with the same 15 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 15 because we have two variables measured over a period of 16 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.56, 0.94 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
2006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021
The number of transportation inspectors in Delaware (Laborers)4015015010013020025027028021023019024012010050
Jet fuel used in Brazil (Million Barrels/Day)77849294108120125125129127116115123119.90661.07275.259




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,213 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 635,695,369 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.
  4. Y-axis doesn't start at zero: I truncated the Y-axes of the graph above. I also used a line graph, which makes the visual connection stand out more than it deserves. Nothing against line graphs. They are great at telling a story when you have linear data! But visually it is deceptive because the only data is at the points on the graph, not the lines on the graph. In between each point, the data could have been doing anything. Like going for a random walk by itself!
    Mathematically what I showed is true, but it is intentionally misleading. Below is the same chart but with both Y-axes starting at zero.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([40,150,150,100,130,200,250,270,280,210,230,190,240,120,100,50,])
array_2 = np.array([77,84,92,94,108,120,125,125,129,127,116,115,123,119.906,61.072,75.259,])
array_1_name = "The number of transportation inspectors in Delaware"
array_2_name = "Jet fuel used in Brazil"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

Your correlation rating is out of this world!


Correlation ID: 2579 · Black Variable ID: 17660 · Red Variable ID: 24230
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0