about · email me · subscribe
Spurious correlation #2,573 · View random

A linear line chart with years as the X-axis and two variables on the Y-axis. The first variable is Burglaries in Kentucky and the second variable is The number of photographers in Kentucky.  The chart goes from 2003 to 2022, and the two variables track closely in value over that time. Small Image
Download png
, svg

AI explanation

Due to the decrease in burglaries, there was less demand for "breaking news" style photography, leading to a decline in the number of photographers in Kentucky as they sought work in other photography fields. Additionally, with fewer burglaries, there were fewer opportunities for photographers to capture dramatic crime scene shots, ultimately impacting the photography industry in a unique and unexpected way.

Model: dalle-3
Prompt: [ Cybernetic art ] Generate an image of photographers in a deserted, cybernetic-infused small town in Kentucky, with their studios being closed down and empty frames surrounding them. The town's residents are depicted feeling exposed and frustrated as the crime rate plummets, impacting the photographers' ability to develop their careers. The scene should evoke a sense of eerie stillness and uncertainty, with a futuristic twist. Focus on capturing the desolate feeling of the once bustling town and the conflicting emotions of its inhabitants. The depiction should include only scenes, people, and objects, it should not include text or speech bubbles.
This image generation prompt was also generated by AI, using the following sequence:

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You select one of a few potential scene descriptors that seems to go along with the variables described. You respond only with the scene descriptions provided and say nothing else.
User prompt: Here are two variables: Burglaries in Kentucky and The number of photographers in Kentucky. Given these, which of the following image style descriptions seems most appropriate? Pick the one that seems to be related to one of the variables at hand. Please respond with only one of the following potential descriptions: a meme a meme Minimalism Cybernetic art Scalar art
ChatGPT: Cybernetic art

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You describe simple visual scenes that depict the two variables stated. You combine both variables into one scene.
User prompt: Please describe a visual scene that prominently depicts both Burglaries in Kentucky and The number of photographers in Kentucky, in the following situation: The decrease in burglaries left photographers without enough "break-in" scenes to capture, leading them to shutter their businesses and focus on other "frame"-worthy subjects. With less crime to document, these photographers were left feeling "exposed" and unable to "develop" their careers in Kentucky.. Keep the description simple.
ChatGPT: In a small Kentucky town, photographers are seen packing up their gear and closing down their studios as the number of burglaries in the area decreases. They look dismayed, surrounded by empty frames and shuttered windows. The town's residents talk about the lack of "break-in" scenes for the photographers to capture, and discuss how they feel "exposed" and unable to "develop" their careers as the crime rate plummets.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You write and improve image generation prompts for DALLE-3. You maintain the same subjects, but enhance the visuals.
User prompt: Please respond with an image generation prompt that would be likely to create an interesting visual using DALLE-3, using the following style: [ Cybernetic art ] and depicting this scene: In a small Kentucky town, photographers are seen packing up their gear and closing down their studios as the number of burglaries in the area decreases. They look dismayed, surrounded by empty frames and shuttered windows. The town's residents talk about the lack of "break-in" scenes for the photographers to capture, and discuss how they feel "exposed" and unable to "develop" their careers as the crime rate plummets. Keep the visual depiction simple. Do not include any words or speech bubbles.
ChatGPT: [ Cybernetic art ] Generate an image of photographers in a deserted, cybernetic-infused small town in Kentucky, with their studios being closed down and empty frames surrounding them. The town's residents are depicted feeling exposed and frustrated as the crime rate plummets, impacting the photographers' ability to develop their careers. The scene should evoke a sense of eerie stillness and uncertainty, with a futuristic twist. Focus on capturing the desolate feeling of the once bustling town and the conflicting emotions of its inhabitants.

*Variations in the User Prompts from chart to chart are just the result of random number generation in Python. I wrote a few arrays of various styles and methods to ask questions to change up the results. Every time this site writes an explanation or generates an image, the script picks from each at random.

I sequence the requests into multiple prompts because I find GPT 3.5 to perform much better with short, well-managed contexts. Thus, I track the context directly in Python and only ask ChatGPT targeted questions.

Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106 (fine-tuned)
System prompt: You provide humorous responses in the form of plausible sounding explanations for correlations. You assume the correlation is causative for the purpose of the explanation even if it is ridiculous. You do not chat with the user, you only reply with the causal connection explanation and nothing else.
User prompt: Please make up a funny explanation for how a decrease in Burglaries in Kentucky caused The number of photographers in Kentucky to decrease. Make it feel plausible.

AI academic paper

(Because p < 0.01)
Capturing Crime: The Shuttering Link Between Burglaries and Photographers in Kentucky

The Kentucky Sociological Lens

Jan 2024

Reminder: This paper is AI-generated. Not real!
Quick note: This sequence is long and repetitive. That's how the prompt engineering works for this one. I manage the output in Python to format it into this PDF.




Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You write titles and abstracts of goofy academic research papers.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, and add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please draft the title and abstract of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Burglaries in Kentucky and The number of photographers in Kentucky. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Make the title punny if you can come up with clever pun. If not, just make it sound clever.

Your research team used data from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Bureau of Larbor Statistics to assess this nagging question. You found a correlation coefficient of 0.9506604 and p < 0.01 for 2003 to 2022.

Please respond in this format (replace "Lorem ipsum dolor sit" with your title and abstract)

[[TITLE]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit

[[ABSTRACT]]
Lorem ipsum dolor sit



ChatGPT:
[[TITLE]]
Capturing Crime: The Shuttering Link Between Burglaries and Photographers in Kentucky

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the striking correlation between Burglaries in Kentucky and the number of photographers in the state. Crime rates have always been a focal point for researchers, and this study aims to shed new light on the curious relationship between burglaries and the photography industry. With a keen focus on Kentucky, the study utilizes data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze crime rates and the number of photographers in the state from 2003 to 2022.


Our findings reveal an astonishingly strong positive correlation between the two variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9506604 and p < 0.01. This robust correlation suggests a tangible relationship between the presence of photographers in Kentucky and the incidence of burglaries. Perhaps the flash of cameras has inadvertently illuminated a previously overlooked link to criminal activity.


A closer examination of this interesting correlation revealed a hitherto unrecognized influence of the photography industry on criminal behavior. Could it be that the presence of photographers inadvertently captures moments of vulnerability, providing unintended insights for potential burglaries? In other words, do burglars develop a keen sense of exposure when they encounter an abundance of shutterbugs? These questions open the door to a new field of research that merges the world of crime with the flash of a camera, perhaps shedding a new light on criminal behavior.


Dad Joke Alert: As we refine our understanding of this correlation, it seems that photographers in Kentucky are "capturing" more than just picturesque moments. They may inadvertently be capturing the attention of those with less-than-honorable intentions! This research paves the way for further investigation into the intriguing dynamics between seemingly unrelated industries and criminal activity.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the introduction section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the introduction section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Burglaries in Kentucky and The number of photographers in Kentucky. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Capturing Crime: The Shuttering Link Between Burglaries and Photographers in Kentucky

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the striking correlation between Burglaries in Kentucky and the number of photographers in the state. Crime rates have always been a focal point for researchers, and this study aims to shed new light on the curious relationship between burglaries and the photography industry. With a keen focus on Kentucky, the study utilizes data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze crime rates and the number of photographers in the state from 2003 to 2022.


Our findings reveal an astonishingly strong positive correlation between the two variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9506604 and p < 0.01. This robust correlation suggests a tangible relationship between the presence of photographers in Kentucky and the incidence of burglaries. Perhaps the flash of cameras has inadvertently illuminated a previously overlooked link to criminal activity.


A closer examination of this interesting correlation revealed a hitherto unrecognized influence of the photography industry on criminal behavior. Could it be that the presence of photographers inadvertently captures moments of vulnerability, providing unintended insights for potential burglaries? In other words, do burglars develop a keen sense of exposure when they encounter an abundance of shutterbugs? These questions open the door to a new field of research that merges the world of crime with the flash of a camera, perhaps shedding a new light on criminal behavior.


Dad Joke Alert: As we refine our understanding of this correlation, it seems that photographers in Kentucky are "capturing" more than just picturesque moments. They may inadvertently be capturing the attention of those with less-than-honorable intentions! This research paves the way for further investigation into the intriguing dynamics between seemingly unrelated industries and criminal activity.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[INTRODUCTION]]



ChatGPT:
[[INTRODUCTION]]

From the iconic bourbon distilleries to the rolling bluegrass fields, Kentucky is known for a myriad of attractions. However, a lesser-known yet equally captivating tale unfolds within the realms of statistical analysis. A study of the intriguing interplay between Burglaries and the presence of photographers in the state has unearthed surprising revelations. It appears that the click of a camera shutter and the breaking of a home's entryway may be entwined in an unexpected dance of statistical significance.

Picture this: a state teeming with professional photographers, capturing weddings, landscapes, and family portraits, unbeknownst to them, weaving an unforeseen narrative within the fabric of criminal activity. The correlation identified between the number of photographers in Kentucky and the incidence of burglaries has raised eyebrows and piqued scholarly curiosity. One might say that the lens has zoomed in on a connection that defies conventional wisdom.

Statistical analysis of crime rates and employment data has uncovered a compelling correlation, leaving researchers to ponder the influence of photography on criminal behavior. Could it be that the art of photography inadvertently paints a canvas of vulnerability, providing a window of opportunity for nefarious activities? In other words, are burglars developing a keen "exposure meter" when they come across an abundance of photographers? It seems that in the world of statistics, even seemingly unrelated variables can develop a picture-perfect relationship ripe for analysis.

Dad Joke Alert: As researchers delve into the connection between burglaries and photographers, it becomes evident that the state of Kentucky is posing an intriguing puzzle. It appears that the shutterbugs may unknowingly be "exposing" more than just their subjects - they might be accidentally capturing the attention of those with a penchant for uninvited visits. This unexpected discovery certainly shines a new light on the proverbial "dark room" of statistical analysis, doesn't it?

As we embark on this empirical journey, the findings and implications of this study will certainly develop a fascinating case study for researchers and aficionados of statistical anomalies alike. So, grab your cameras, folks, because this research venture promises to uncover connections that are more than just a "snapshot" of statistical data.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft a literature review section of an academic research paper, that starts out dry for the first few sentences but then becomes hilarious and goofy.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a literature review section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Burglaries in Kentucky and The number of photographers in Kentucky. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences.

Speak in the present tense for this section (the authors find...), as is common in academic research paper literature reviews. Name the sources in a format similar to this: In "Book," the authors find lorem and ipsum.

Make up the lorem and ipsum part, but make it sound related to the topic at hand.

Start by naming serious-sounding studies by authors like Smith, Doe, and Jones - but then quickly devolve. Name some real non-fiction books that would be related to the topic. Then name some real fiction books that sound like they could be related. Then name a few real TV shows that sound like they might be relevant to the topic that you watched as research.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Capturing Crime: The Shuttering Link Between Burglaries and Photographers in Kentucky

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the striking correlation between Burglaries in Kentucky and the number of photographers in the state. Crime rates have always been a focal point for researchers, and this study aims to shed new light on the curious relationship between burglaries and the photography industry. With a keen focus on Kentucky, the study utilizes data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze crime rates and the number of photographers in the state from 2003 to 2022.


Our findings reveal an astonishingly strong positive correlation between the two variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9506604 and p < 0.01. This robust correlation suggests a tangible relationship between the presence of photographers in Kentucky and the incidence of burglaries. Perhaps the flash of cameras has inadvertently illuminated a previously overlooked link to criminal activity.


A closer examination of this interesting correlation revealed a hitherto unrecognized influence of the photography industry on criminal behavior. Could it be that the presence of photographers inadvertently captures moments of vulnerability, providing unintended insights for potential burglaries? In other words, do burglars develop a keen sense of exposure when they encounter an abundance of shutterbugs? These questions open the door to a new field of research that merges the world of crime with the flash of a camera, perhaps shedding a new light on criminal behavior.


Dad Joke Alert: As we refine our understanding of this correlation, it seems that photographers in Kentucky are "capturing" more than just picturesque moments. They may inadvertently be capturing the attention of those with less-than-honorable intentions! This research paves the way for further investigation into the intriguing dynamics between seemingly unrelated industries and criminal activity.

-------

And here is the introduction section that led to this literature review:
[[INTRODUCTION]]
From the iconic bourbon distilleries to the rolling bluegrass fields, Kentucky is known for a myriad of attractions. However, a lesser-known yet equally captivating tale unfolds within the realms of statistical analysis. A study of the intriguing interplay between Burglaries and the presence of photographers in the state has unearthed surprising revelations. It appears that the click of a camera shutter and the breaking of a home's entryway may be entwined in an unexpected dance of statistical significance.
Picture this: a state teeming with professional photographers, capturing weddings, landscapes, and family portraits, unbeknownst to them, weaving an unforeseen narrative within the fabric of criminal activity. The correlation identified between the number of photographers in Kentucky and the incidence of burglaries has raised eyebrows and piqued scholarly curiosity. One might say that the lens has zoomed in on a connection that defies conventional wisdom.
Statistical analysis of crime rates and employment data has uncovered a compelling correlation, leaving researchers to ponder the influence of photography on criminal behavior. Could it be that the art of photography inadvertently paints a canvas of vulnerability, providing a window of opportunity for nefarious activities? In other words, are burglars developing a keen "exposure meter" when they come across an abundance of photographers? It seems that in the world of statistics, even seemingly unrelated variables can develop a picture-perfect relationship ripe for analysis.
Dad Joke Alert: As researchers delve into the connection between burglaries and photographers, it becomes evident that the state of Kentucky is posing an intriguing puzzle. It appears that the shutterbugs may unknowingly be "exposing" more than just their subjects - they might be accidentally capturing the attention of those with a penchant for uninvited visits. This unexpected discovery certainly shines a new light on the proverbial "dark room" of statistical analysis, doesn't it?
As we embark on this empirical journey, the findings and implications of this study will certainly develop a fascinating case study for researchers and aficionados of statistical anomalies alike. So, grab your cameras, folks, because this research venture promises to uncover connections that are more than just a "snapshot" of statistical data.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]



ChatGPT:
[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]

Smith and Doe (2015) contend that examining the relationship between seemingly unrelated industries can often lead to unexpected insights. Similarly, Jones et al. (2018) highlight the importance of exploring unconventional connections in statistical analysis, emphasizing the potential for groundbreaking discoveries. Such scholarly discourse sets the stage for our investigation into the correlation between burglaries and the presence of photographers in Kentucky.

In "Urban Dynamics and Photographers: Unveiling Unconventional Influences" by Johnson (2017), the author posits that urban phenomena can intersect with seemingly unrelated industries, and the influence of photographers on crime rates is no exception. This work provides a theoretical framework for understanding the unexpected entanglement of photography and criminal activities.

On a more lighthearted note, "The F-Stop of Crime" by Noir (2019) offers a comical yet insightful perspective into the unlikely connections between photography and criminal behavior. The author wittily reflects on how the flash of a camera might inadvertently illuminate more than just picturesque moments, shedding a new light on the covert influences of the photography industry.

Adding to the mix, "The Lens of Intrigue: A Photographic Whodunit" by Mystery (2016) delves into the enigmatic world of photography and its potential impact on criminal minds. While couched in fiction, this novel unravels an intricate plot where the art of photography becomes entwined with clandestine activities, offering a whimsical take on the unexpected interplay between shutterbugs and lawbreakers.

As part of the extensive research for this study, "CSI: Kentucky" and "Crime Scene Photography Chronicles" were also consulted for a comprehensive understanding of crime detection and investigative procedures. While these TV shows primarily focus on crime scene documentation, the subtle nuances of photography's role in criminal contexts cannot be overlooked.

Our investigation extends beyond conventional boundaries, aiming to uncover the compelling correlation between burglaries and the thriving photographer community in the state of Kentucky. The exploration promises to offer a captivating yet unexpected lens through which to view the intrinsic connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. After all, who knew that the lens of statistical analysis would bring into focus such an unexpected snapshot of correlation?

Dad Joke Alert: In this endeavor, it seems that we're uncovering connections that are more than just a "snapshot" of statistical data - they're developing into a veritable photo album of unexpected correlations!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the methodology section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the methodology section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Burglaries in Kentucky and The number of photographers in Kentucky. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Bureau of Larbor Statistics . You used data from 2003 to 2022

Make up the research methods you don't know. Make them a bit goofy and convoluted.

Here is the title, abstract, and introduction of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Capturing Crime: The Shuttering Link Between Burglaries and Photographers in Kentucky

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the striking correlation between Burglaries in Kentucky and the number of photographers in the state. Crime rates have always been a focal point for researchers, and this study aims to shed new light on the curious relationship between burglaries and the photography industry. With a keen focus on Kentucky, the study utilizes data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze crime rates and the number of photographers in the state from 2003 to 2022.


Our findings reveal an astonishingly strong positive correlation between the two variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9506604 and p < 0.01. This robust correlation suggests a tangible relationship between the presence of photographers in Kentucky and the incidence of burglaries. Perhaps the flash of cameras has inadvertently illuminated a previously overlooked link to criminal activity.


A closer examination of this interesting correlation revealed a hitherto unrecognized influence of the photography industry on criminal behavior. Could it be that the presence of photographers inadvertently captures moments of vulnerability, providing unintended insights for potential burglaries? In other words, do burglars develop a keen sense of exposure when they encounter an abundance of shutterbugs? These questions open the door to a new field of research that merges the world of crime with the flash of a camera, perhaps shedding a new light on criminal behavior.


Dad Joke Alert: As we refine our understanding of this correlation, it seems that photographers in Kentucky are "capturing" more than just picturesque moments. They may inadvertently be capturing the attention of those with less-than-honorable intentions! This research paves the way for further investigation into the intriguing dynamics between seemingly unrelated industries and criminal activity.

[[INTRODUCTION]]
From the iconic bourbon distilleries to the rolling bluegrass fields, Kentucky is known for a myriad of attractions. However, a lesser-known yet equally captivating tale unfolds within the realms of statistical analysis. A study of the intriguing interplay between Burglaries and the presence of photographers in the state has unearthed surprising revelations. It appears that the click of a camera shutter and the breaking of a home's entryway may be entwined in an unexpected dance of statistical significance.
Picture this: a state teeming with professional photographers, capturing weddings, landscapes, and family portraits, unbeknownst to them, weaving an unforeseen narrative within the fabric of criminal activity. The correlation identified between the number of photographers in Kentucky and the incidence of burglaries has raised eyebrows and piqued scholarly curiosity. One might say that the lens has zoomed in on a connection that defies conventional wisdom.
Statistical analysis of crime rates and employment data has uncovered a compelling correlation, leaving researchers to ponder the influence of photography on criminal behavior. Could it be that the art of photography inadvertently paints a canvas of vulnerability, providing a window of opportunity for nefarious activities? In other words, are burglars developing a keen "exposure meter" when they come across an abundance of photographers? It seems that in the world of statistics, even seemingly unrelated variables can develop a picture-perfect relationship ripe for analysis.
Dad Joke Alert: As researchers delve into the connection between burglaries and photographers, it becomes evident that the state of Kentucky is posing an intriguing puzzle. It appears that the shutterbugs may unknowingly be "exposing" more than just their subjects - they might be accidentally capturing the attention of those with a penchant for uninvited visits. This unexpected discovery certainly shines a new light on the proverbial "dark room" of statistical analysis, doesn't it?
As we embark on this empirical journey, the findings and implications of this study will certainly develop a fascinating case study for researchers and aficionados of statistical anomalies alike. So, grab your cameras, folks, because this research venture promises to uncover connections that are more than just a "snapshot" of statistical data.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[METHODOLOGY]]



ChatGPT:

[[METHODOLOGY]]

To unravel the intriguing correlation between burglaries and the presence of photographers in Kentucky, our research team employed a range of data collection and analysis methods that would make Sherlock Holmes proud. Our primary sources of data included the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics, providing a treasure trove of information from 2003 to 2022. However, we also scoured the depths of the internet, navigating through the virtual wilderness to capture elusive data points, much like intrepid wildlife photographers tracking their elusive subjects.

In an effort to harness the full breadth of our statistical prowess, we implemented a convoluted, yet oddly charming, combination of regression analysis, trend modeling, and spatial mapping techniques. We juggled these methods like a band of circus entertainers, all in the name of teasing out the subtleties of this correlation. After all, when it comes to statistical analysis, sometimes the most unconventional methods produce the most captivating results.

The correlation between burglary rates and the count of photographers was determined using advanced statistical software, allowing us to split the data, merge the variables, and twirl them around like ballroom dancers until they revealed their secrets. Once the dust settled and the pixels cleared, we were left with a correlation coefficient so strong, it could bench press a barbell made of confidence intervals. The reliability of our findings was further supported by the robustness of our statistical tests, ensuring that our results were as sturdy as a well-built camera tripod.

Of course, no study would be complete without accounting for potential confounding variables that could muddy the waters of our research. We meticulously combed through an assortment of factors, adopting a forensic mindset akin to seasoned crime scene investigators, to ensure that our analysis only captured the true essence of the correlation we sought.

Throughout this methodological odyssey, we made sure to keep our eyes keenly focused on the objective at hand, much like a hawk-eyed wildlife photographer tracking the flight of an elusive bird. By meticulously combining the art of technical analysis with the science of statistical inquiry, we arrived at a thorough and compelling understanding of the connection between burglaries and the photography industry in the state of Kentucky.

Dad Joke Alert: As we chased after data points and corralled statistical outliers, it became evident that unraveling this correlation required a level of resilience and dedication that even professional photographers would admire. It seems that our love for statistical adventure has led us down a path of discovery that is nothing short of a captivating "photo finish."


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the results section of an academic research paper. You speak in the past tense (you found...).
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the results section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Burglaries in Kentucky and The number of photographers in Kentucky. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Your research team collected data from all across the internet, but mostly just used information from FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and Bureau of Larbor Statistics .

For the time period 2003 to 2022, you found a correlation 0.9506604, r-squared of 0.9037552, and p < 0.01.

One figure will be included. The figure (Fig. 1) is a scatterplot showing the strong correlation between the two variables. You don't need to specify where; I will add the figure.

Here is the title and abstract of the paper:
[[TITLE]]
Capturing Crime: The Shuttering Link Between Burglaries and Photographers in Kentucky

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the striking correlation between Burglaries in Kentucky and the number of photographers in the state. Crime rates have always been a focal point for researchers, and this study aims to shed new light on the curious relationship between burglaries and the photography industry. With a keen focus on Kentucky, the study utilizes data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze crime rates and the number of photographers in the state from 2003 to 2022.


Our findings reveal an astonishingly strong positive correlation between the two variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9506604 and p < 0.01. This robust correlation suggests a tangible relationship between the presence of photographers in Kentucky and the incidence of burglaries. Perhaps the flash of cameras has inadvertently illuminated a previously overlooked link to criminal activity.


A closer examination of this interesting correlation revealed a hitherto unrecognized influence of the photography industry on criminal behavior. Could it be that the presence of photographers inadvertently captures moments of vulnerability, providing unintended insights for potential burglaries? In other words, do burglars develop a keen sense of exposure when they encounter an abundance of shutterbugs? These questions open the door to a new field of research that merges the world of crime with the flash of a camera, perhaps shedding a new light on criminal behavior.


Dad Joke Alert: As we refine our understanding of this correlation, it seems that photographers in Kentucky are "capturing" more than just picturesque moments. They may inadvertently be capturing the attention of those with less-than-honorable intentions! This research paves the way for further investigation into the intriguing dynamics between seemingly unrelated industries and criminal activity.

-------

And here is the methodology section that led to this result:
[[METHODOLOGY]]
From the iconic bourbon distilleries to the rolling bluegrass fields, Kentucky is known for a myriad of attractions. However, a lesser-known yet equally captivating tale unfolds within the realms of statistical analysis. A study of the intriguing interplay between Burglaries and the presence of photographers in the state has unearthed surprising revelations. It appears that the click of a camera shutter and the breaking of a home's entryway may be entwined in an unexpected dance of statistical significance.
Picture this: a state teeming with professional photographers, capturing weddings, landscapes, and family portraits, unbeknownst to them, weaving an unforeseen narrative within the fabric of criminal activity. The correlation identified between the number of photographers in Kentucky and the incidence of burglaries has raised eyebrows and piqued scholarly curiosity. One might say that the lens has zoomed in on a connection that defies conventional wisdom.
Statistical analysis of crime rates and employment data has uncovered a compelling correlation, leaving researchers to ponder the influence of photography on criminal behavior. Could it be that the art of photography inadvertently paints a canvas of vulnerability, providing a window of opportunity for nefarious activities? In other words, are burglars developing a keen "exposure meter" when they come across an abundance of photographers? It seems that in the world of statistics, even seemingly unrelated variables can develop a picture-perfect relationship ripe for analysis.
Dad Joke Alert: As researchers delve into the connection between burglaries and photographers, it becomes evident that the state of Kentucky is posing an intriguing puzzle. It appears that the shutterbugs may unknowingly be "exposing" more than just their subjects - they might be accidentally capturing the attention of those with a penchant for uninvited visits. This unexpected discovery certainly shines a new light on the proverbial "dark room" of statistical analysis, doesn't it?
As we embark on this empirical journey, the findings and implications of this study will certainly develop a fascinating case study for researchers and aficionados of statistical anomalies alike. So, grab your cameras, folks, because this research venture promises to uncover connections that are more than just a "snapshot" of statistical data.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[RESULTS]]



ChatGPT:

[[RESULTS]]

The results of our analysis unmistakably reveal a remarkably strong positive correlation between the number of photographers and the incidence of burglaries in Kentucky from 2003 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9506604 (p < 0.01) and an r-squared of 0.9037552 provide compelling evidence of the association between these seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that as the number of photographers captures the limelight in Kentucky, so does the incidence of burglaries.

Fig. 1, the scatterplot illustrating this correlation, shines a light on the compelling relationship between these variables. It appears that as the number of photographers increases, so does the frequency of burglary incidents. One might say that this connection develops a picture that is worth more than a thousand words - or in this case, perhaps more than a thousand stolen valuables.

Dad Joke Alert: It seems that in Kentucky, "shooting" with a camera and "shooting" for notorious activities go hand in hand! This unexpected association between photographers and burglaries paints a thought-provoking portrait of statistical intrigue that beckons further exploration.

These findings prompt a consideration of the potential mechanisms underlying this connection. Could it be that the presence of photographers inadvertently sheds light on unsuspecting targets, offering an inadvertent spotlight for would-be burglars? It appears that the world of statistical analysis has exposed an unexpected aperture through which the influence of photographers intersects with the realm of criminal behavior.

Our results open a lens into a captivating area of research, one that delves into the intricate interplay between industries and crime. As the flash of insight into this connection develops, it brings to the forefront the previously uncharted territory where the fields of photography and crime intersect. This reinforces the notion that, in the world of statistics, the unexpected often develops in the most captivating and thought-provoking forms.

The robustness of the observed correlation challenges preconceived notions and emphasizes the need for further studies to unravel the underlying dynamics. As we conclude this phase of our investigation, we can say with confidence that the compelling correlation between burglaries and the number of photographers in Kentucky presents a captivating narrative that deserves further exploration and understanding.

Our study underscores the intrigue and complexity that underpin statistical relationships, paving the way for future investigations that seek to uncover the captivating stories hidden within the world of data. So, as we illuminate the path for future research, let us not lose sight of the fact that in the world of statistics, even the most unexpected connections can develop a picture-perfect storyline that captures the imagination of researchers and stakeholders alike.


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of an academic research paper.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up the discussion section of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Burglaries in Kentucky and The number of photographers in Kentucky. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 500 tokens.

Here are the title, abstract, literature review, and results sections. Please harken back to 1-2 of the goofy items in the literature review, but pretend to take them completely seriously. Discuss how your results supported the prior research.

Do not write a conclusion. I will add a conclusion after this.

[[TITLE]]
Capturing Crime: The Shuttering Link Between Burglaries and Photographers in Kentucky

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the striking correlation between Burglaries in Kentucky and the number of photographers in the state. Crime rates have always been a focal point for researchers, and this study aims to shed new light on the curious relationship between burglaries and the photography industry. With a keen focus on Kentucky, the study utilizes data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze crime rates and the number of photographers in the state from 2003 to 2022.


Our findings reveal an astonishingly strong positive correlation between the two variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9506604 and p < 0.01. This robust correlation suggests a tangible relationship between the presence of photographers in Kentucky and the incidence of burglaries. Perhaps the flash of cameras has inadvertently illuminated a previously overlooked link to criminal activity.


A closer examination of this interesting correlation revealed a hitherto unrecognized influence of the photography industry on criminal behavior. Could it be that the presence of photographers inadvertently captures moments of vulnerability, providing unintended insights for potential burglaries? In other words, do burglars develop a keen sense of exposure when they encounter an abundance of shutterbugs? These questions open the door to a new field of research that merges the world of crime with the flash of a camera, perhaps shedding a new light on criminal behavior.


Dad Joke Alert: As we refine our understanding of this correlation, it seems that photographers in Kentucky are "capturing" more than just picturesque moments. They may inadvertently be capturing the attention of those with less-than-honorable intentions! This research paves the way for further investigation into the intriguing dynamics between seemingly unrelated industries and criminal activity.

[[LITERATURE REVIEW]]
Smith and Doe (2015) contend that examining the relationship between seemingly unrelated industries can often lead to unexpected insights. Similarly, Jones et al. (2018) highlight the importance of exploring unconventional connections in statistical analysis, emphasizing the potential for groundbreaking discoveries. Such scholarly discourse sets the stage for our investigation into the correlation between burglaries and the presence of photographers in Kentucky.
In "Urban Dynamics and Photographers: Unveiling Unconventional Influences" by Johnson (2017), the author posits that urban phenomena can intersect with seemingly unrelated industries, and the influence of photographers on crime rates is no exception. This work provides a theoretical framework for understanding the unexpected entanglement of photography and criminal activities.
On a more lighthearted note, "The F-Stop of Crime" by Noir (2019) offers a comical yet insightful perspective into the unlikely connections between photography and criminal behavior. The author wittily reflects on how the flash of a camera might inadvertently illuminate more than just picturesque moments, shedding a new light on the covert influences of the photography industry.
Adding to the mix, "The Lens of Intrigue: A Photographic Whodunit" by Mystery (2016) delves into the enigmatic world of photography and its potential impact on criminal minds. While couched in fiction, this novel unravels an intricate plot where the art of photography becomes entwined with clandestine activities, offering a whimsical take on the unexpected interplay between shutterbugs and lawbreakers.
As part of the extensive research for this study, "CSI: Kentucky" and "Crime Scene Photography Chronicles" were also consulted for a comprehensive understanding of crime detection and investigative procedures. While these TV shows primarily focus on crime scene documentation, the subtle nuances of photography's role in criminal contexts cannot be overlooked.
Our investigation extends beyond conventional boundaries, aiming to uncover the compelling correlation between burglaries and the thriving photographer community in the state of Kentucky. The exploration promises to offer a captivating yet unexpected lens through which to view the intrinsic connections between seemingly unrelated phenomena. After all, who knew that the lens of statistical analysis would bring into focus such an unexpected snapshot of correlation?
Dad Joke Alert: In this endeavor, it seems that we're uncovering connections that are more than just a "snapshot" of statistical data - they're developing into a veritable photo album of unexpected correlations!

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis unmistakably reveal a remarkably strong positive correlation between the number of photographers and the incidence of burglaries in Kentucky from 2003 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9506604 (p < 0.01) and an r-squared of 0.9037552 provide compelling evidence of the association between these seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that as the number of photographers captures the limelight in Kentucky, so does the incidence of burglaries.
Fig. 1, the scatterplot illustrating this correlation, shines a light on the compelling relationship between these variables. It appears that as the number of photographers increases, so does the frequency of burglary incidents. One might say that this connection develops a picture that is worth more than a thousand words - or in this case, perhaps more than a thousand stolen valuables.
Dad Joke Alert: It seems that in Kentucky, "shooting" with a camera and "shooting" for notorious activities go hand in hand! This unexpected association between photographers and burglaries paints a thought-provoking portrait of statistical intrigue that beckons further exploration.
These findings prompt a consideration of the potential mechanisms underlying this connection. Could it be that the presence of photographers inadvertently sheds light on unsuspecting targets, offering an inadvertent spotlight for would-be burglars? It appears that the world of statistical analysis has exposed an unexpected aperture through which the influence of photographers intersects with the realm of criminal behavior.
Our results open a lens into a captivating area of research, one that delves into the intricate interplay between industries and crime. As the flash of insight into this connection develops, it brings to the forefront the previously uncharted territory where the fields of photography and crime intersect. This reinforces the notion that, in the world of statistics, the unexpected often develops in the most captivating and thought-provoking forms.
The robustness of the observed correlation challenges preconceived notions and emphasizes the need for further studies to unravel the underlying dynamics. As we conclude this phase of our investigation, we can say with confidence that the compelling correlation between burglaries and the number of photographers in Kentucky presents a captivating narrative that deserves further exploration and understanding.
Our study underscores the intrigue and complexity that underpin statistical relationships, paving the way for future investigations that seek to uncover the captivating stories hidden within the world of data. So, as we illuminate the path for future research, let us not lose sight of the fact that in the world of statistics, even the most unexpected connections can develop a picture-perfect storyline that captures the imagination of researchers and stakeholders alike.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[DISCUSSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[DISCUSSION]]

Our study has uncovered a startling correlation between the presence of photographers and the incidence of burglaries in Kentucky. This unexpected relationship not only raises eyebrows but also sheds light on the curious intersection between seemingly unrelated industries. It seems that the saying, "A picture is worth a thousand words," takes on a whole new meaning in the context of statistical correlations.

Our findings support prior research, echoing the sentiments of Smith and Doe (2015), who emphasized the potential for unexpected insights when exploring seemingly disconnected variables. Similarly, Jones et al. (2018) highlighted the importance of delving into unconventional connections in statistical analysis, a sentiment that resonates deeply with our unexpected yet robust findings. It appears that the art of statistical analysis, much like the art of photography, often reveals intriguing tales that demand further exploration.

It's as if by examining the world through the lens of statistics, we've stumbled upon a captivating photo album of unconventional correlations. And much like a photographer capturing unexpected moments, these statistical relationships capture the attention and imagination of researchers and stakeholders alike.

The robust correlation coefficient and the r-squared value in our study not only capture the attention but also emphasize the compelling nature of this relationship. It's as if the shutter of statistical analysis has painted a picture of unexpected intrigue, providing a snapshot of the captivating connection between the presence of photographers and the incidence of burglaries in Kentucky.

One might jest that this intriguing correlation has developed into a "snapshot" of statistical whimsy, offering a glimpse into the unexpected interplay between the worlds of photography and crime. As we shed light on this unexpected aperture of statistical discovery, it's evident that the captivating narrative unfolded by our findings beckons further investigation and understanding.

In conclusion, our study illuminates the enthralling dynamics of statistical correlations, illustrating the striking influence of the photography industry on criminal behavior. Much like the development of a captivating photograph, our understanding of this correlation deepens, offering a vivid representation of the unexpected encounters that await within the world of statistical analysis. So, as we look to the future, let us remember that in the world of statistics, the most unexpected connections often develop a picture-perfect storyline that captures the imagination of researchers and stakeholders alike.



Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You are a researcher writing an academic paper.You draft the discussion section of goofy academic research papers that sounds like it belongs based on the title and abstract provided.
User prompt:
Pretend you are an academic researcher. Your writing sounds like it belongs in a medical or economics journal. However, you frequently crack jokes, make puns, or add unexpected twists in your writing.

Please make up a short conclusion of an academic research paper presenting the findings of the connection between Burglaries in Kentucky and The number of photographers in Kentucky. You can't resist a good dad joke. Add a relevant dad joke related to the content every couple of sentences. Sneak in some jokes and clever puns about science, research, statistics, and the variables.

Limit your response to 300 tokens. At the very end, assert that no more research is needed in this area.

Here are the title, abstract, introduction, and results sections.
[[TITLE]]
Capturing Crime: The Shuttering Link Between Burglaries and Photographers in Kentucky

[[ABSTRACT]]
This study delves into the striking correlation between Burglaries in Kentucky and the number of photographers in the state. Crime rates have always been a focal point for researchers, and this study aims to shed new light on the curious relationship between burglaries and the photography industry. With a keen focus on Kentucky, the study utilizes data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze crime rates and the number of photographers in the state from 2003 to 2022.


Our findings reveal an astonishingly strong positive correlation between the two variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9506604 and p < 0.01. This robust correlation suggests a tangible relationship between the presence of photographers in Kentucky and the incidence of burglaries. Perhaps the flash of cameras has inadvertently illuminated a previously overlooked link to criminal activity.


A closer examination of this interesting correlation revealed a hitherto unrecognized influence of the photography industry on criminal behavior. Could it be that the presence of photographers inadvertently captures moments of vulnerability, providing unintended insights for potential burglaries? In other words, do burglars develop a keen sense of exposure when they encounter an abundance of shutterbugs? These questions open the door to a new field of research that merges the world of crime with the flash of a camera, perhaps shedding a new light on criminal behavior.


Dad Joke Alert: As we refine our understanding of this correlation, it seems that photographers in Kentucky are "capturing" more than just picturesque moments. They may inadvertently be capturing the attention of those with less-than-honorable intentions! This research paves the way for further investigation into the intriguing dynamics between seemingly unrelated industries and criminal activity.

[[INTRDUCTION]]
From the iconic bourbon distilleries to the rolling bluegrass fields, Kentucky is known for a myriad of attractions. However, a lesser-known yet equally captivating tale unfolds within the realms of statistical analysis. A study of the intriguing interplay between Burglaries and the presence of photographers in the state has unearthed surprising revelations. It appears that the click of a camera shutter and the breaking of a home's entryway may be entwined in an unexpected dance of statistical significance.
Picture this: a state teeming with professional photographers, capturing weddings, landscapes, and family portraits, unbeknownst to them, weaving an unforeseen narrative within the fabric of criminal activity. The correlation identified between the number of photographers in Kentucky and the incidence of burglaries has raised eyebrows and piqued scholarly curiosity. One might say that the lens has zoomed in on a connection that defies conventional wisdom.
Statistical analysis of crime rates and employment data has uncovered a compelling correlation, leaving researchers to ponder the influence of photography on criminal behavior. Could it be that the art of photography inadvertently paints a canvas of vulnerability, providing a window of opportunity for nefarious activities? In other words, are burglars developing a keen "exposure meter" when they come across an abundance of photographers? It seems that in the world of statistics, even seemingly unrelated variables can develop a picture-perfect relationship ripe for analysis.
Dad Joke Alert: As researchers delve into the connection between burglaries and photographers, it becomes evident that the state of Kentucky is posing an intriguing puzzle. It appears that the shutterbugs may unknowingly be "exposing" more than just their subjects - they might be accidentally capturing the attention of those with a penchant for uninvited visits. This unexpected discovery certainly shines a new light on the proverbial "dark room" of statistical analysis, doesn't it?
As we embark on this empirical journey, the findings and implications of this study will certainly develop a fascinating case study for researchers and aficionados of statistical anomalies alike. So, grab your cameras, folks, because this research venture promises to uncover connections that are more than just a "snapshot" of statistical data.

[[RESULTS]]
The results of our analysis unmistakably reveal a remarkably strong positive correlation between the number of photographers and the incidence of burglaries in Kentucky from 2003 to 2022. The correlation coefficient of 0.9506604 (p < 0.01) and an r-squared of 0.9037552 provide compelling evidence of the association between these seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that as the number of photographers captures the limelight in Kentucky, so does the incidence of burglaries.
Fig. 1, the scatterplot illustrating this correlation, shines a light on the compelling relationship between these variables. It appears that as the number of photographers increases, so does the frequency of burglary incidents. One might say that this connection develops a picture that is worth more than a thousand words - or in this case, perhaps more than a thousand stolen valuables.
Dad Joke Alert: It seems that in Kentucky, "shooting" with a camera and "shooting" for notorious activities go hand in hand! This unexpected association between photographers and burglaries paints a thought-provoking portrait of statistical intrigue that beckons further exploration.
These findings prompt a consideration of the potential mechanisms underlying this connection. Could it be that the presence of photographers inadvertently sheds light on unsuspecting targets, offering an inadvertent spotlight for would-be burglars? It appears that the world of statistical analysis has exposed an unexpected aperture through which the influence of photographers intersects with the realm of criminal behavior.
Our results open a lens into a captivating area of research, one that delves into the intricate interplay between industries and crime. As the flash of insight into this connection develops, it brings to the forefront the previously uncharted territory where the fields of photography and crime intersect. This reinforces the notion that, in the world of statistics, the unexpected often develops in the most captivating and thought-provoking forms.
The robustness of the observed correlation challenges preconceived notions and emphasizes the need for further studies to unravel the underlying dynamics. As we conclude this phase of our investigation, we can say with confidence that the compelling correlation between burglaries and the number of photographers in Kentucky presents a captivating narrative that deserves further exploration and understanding.
Our study underscores the intrigue and complexity that underpin statistical relationships, paving the way for future investigations that seek to uncover the captivating stories hidden within the world of data. So, as we illuminate the path for future research, let us not lose sight of the fact that in the world of statistics, even the most unexpected connections can develop a picture-perfect storyline that captures the imagination of researchers and stakeholders alike.

-------

Your response should start like this:

[[CONCLUSION]]



ChatGPT:

[[CONCLUSION]]

In conclusion, our examination of the connection between burglaries in Kentucky and the number of photographers in the state has unraveled an unexpected narrative of statistical significance. Our findings have demonstrated a strong positive correlation that challenges conventional assumptions, shedding light on the intricate interplay between these seemingly unrelated variables. It seems that the flash of cameras in Kentucky may inadvertently be illuminating more than just picturesque landscapes – they may be inadvertently capturing the attention of those with less-than-honorable intentions! It's a real "exposure" of unexpected relationships, isn't it?

The results of this study have given rise to a captivating puzzle that blurs the lines between statistical analysis and anecdotal intrigue, presenting a compelling case for further exploration. It appears that in the realm of statistical analysis, the unexpected often develops the most captivating and thought-provoking forms of storytelling and revelation. For instance, who knew that a correlation between photographers and burglaries could develop a picture that is worth more than a thousand words, or in this case, perhaps more than a thousand stolen valuables?

Dad Joke Alert: As we wrap up this groundbreaking research, it's clear that the state of Kentucky has certainly developed a knack for posing fascinating statistical puzzles. Perhaps we can say that our findings have "exposed" a new frontier of statistical correlation that was previously lurking in the shadows. Seriously, it's a real "flashy" find, isn't it?

Given the compelling nature of our findings, it is evident that no more research is needed in this area. We have discovered a correlation that deserves further investigation. It seems that in the realm of statistical analysis, the unexpected often develops in the most unexpected and captivating forms – and in this case, the connection between burglaries and the number of photographers has certainly piqued scholarly curiosity. Let's count this as a win and close the shutter on this captivating research endeavor!


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of academic journals. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding research, scientific, or academic journal that would publish a paper entited Capturing Crime: The Shuttering Link Between Burglaries and Photographers in Kentucky. Respond only with the name of a fictional academic journal.

ChatGPT:

The Kentucky Sociological Lens


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide fictional names of nonprofit research organizations and associations. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide the name of a funny but plausible sounding nonprofit, academic, or scientific association or organization that would sponsor research that resulted in a paper entited Capturing Crime: The Shuttering Link Between Burglaries and Photographers in Kentucky. Respond only with the name of a fictional organization.

ChatGPT:

The Institute for Photographic Criminology


Model: gpt-3.5-turbo-1106
System prompt: You provide potential search keywords separated by commas. You say nothing else, and you do not chat with the user.
User prompt: Please provide potential search keywords for a paper titled Capturing Crime: The Shuttering Link Between Burglaries and Photographers in Kentucky with an abstract of This study delves into the striking correlation between Burglaries in Kentucky and the number of photographers in the state. Crime rates have always been a focal point for researchers, and this study aims to shed new light on the curious relationship between burglaries and the photography industry. With a keen focus on Kentucky, the study utilizes data from the FBI Criminal Justice Information Services and the Bureau of Labor Statistics to analyze crime rates and the number of photographers in the state from 2003 to 2022.

Our findings reveal an astonishingly strong positive correlation between the two variables, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9506604 and p < 0.01. This robust correlation suggests a tangible relationship between the presence of photographers in Kentucky and the incidence of burglaries. Perhaps the flash of cameras has inadvertently illuminated a previously overlooked link to criminal activity.

A closer examination of this interesting correlation revealed a hitherto unrecognized influence of the photography industry on criminal behavior. Could it be that the presence of photographers inadvertently captures moments of vulnerability, providing unintended insights for potential burglaries? In other words, do burglars develop a keen sense of exposure when they encounter an abundance of shutterbugs? These questions open the door to a new field of research that merges the world of crime with the flash of a camera, perhaps shedding a new light on criminal behavior.

Dad Joke Alert: As we refine our understanding of this correlation, it seems that photographers in Kentucky are "capturing" more than just picturesque moments. They may inadvertently be capturing the attention of those with less-than-honorable intentions! This research paves the way for further investigation into the intriguing dynamics between seemingly unrelated industries and criminal activity.

ChatGPT:

burglaries, photographers, Kentucky crime rates, FBI Criminal Justice Information Services, Bureau of Labor Statistics, correlation between burglaries and photographers, photographers' influence on criminal behavior, crime and photography industry, criminal behavior dynamics, Kentucky criminal activity

*There is a bunch of Python happening behind the scenes to turn this prompt sequence into a PDF.



Random correlation

Discover a new correlation

View all correlations

View all research papers

Report an error


Data details

Burglaries in Kentucky
Detailed data title: The burglary rate per 100,000 residents in Kentucky
Source: FBI Criminal Justice Information Services
See what else correlates with Burglaries in Kentucky

The number of photographers in Kentucky
Detailed data title: BLS estimate of photographers in Kentucky
Source: Bureau of Larbor Statistics
See what else correlates with The number of photographers in Kentucky

Correlation r = 0.9506604 (Pearson correlation coefficient)
Correlation is a measure of how much the variables move together. If it is 0.99, when one goes up the other goes up. If it is 0.02, the connection is very weak or non-existent. If it is -0.99, then when one goes up the other goes down. If it is 1.00, you probably messed up your correlation function.

r2 = 0.9037552 (Coefficient of determination)
This means 90.4% of the change in the one variable (i.e., The number of photographers in Kentucky) is predictable based on the change in the other (i.e., Burglaries in Kentucky) over the 20 years from 2003 through 2022.

p < 0.01, which is statistically significant(Null hypothesis significance test)
The p-value is 1.4E-10. 0.0000000001375176492753124000
The p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme. More specifically the p-value is a measure of how probable it is that we would randomly find a result this extreme if we had only tested one pair of variables one time.

But I am a p-villain. I absolutely did not test only one pair of variables one time. I correlated hundreds of millions of pairs of variables. I threw boatloads of data into an industrial-sized blender to find this correlation.

Who is going to stop me? p-value reporting doesn't require me to report how many calculations I had to go through in order to find a low p-value!
On average, you will find a correaltion as strong as 0.95 in 1.4E-8% of random cases. Said differently, if you correlated 7,271,793,877 random variables You don't actually need 7 billion variables to find a correlation like this one. I don't have that many variables in my database. You can also correlate variables that are not independent. I do this a lot.

p-value calculations are useful for understanding the probability of a result happening by chance. They are most useful when used to highlight the risk of a fluke outcome. For example, if you calculate a p-value of 0.30, the risk that the result is a fluke is high. It is good to know that! But there are lots of ways to get a p-value of less than 0.01, as evidenced by this project.

In this particular case, the values are so extreme as to be meaningless. That's why no one reports p-values with specificity after they drop below 0.01.

Just to be clear: I'm being completely transparent about the calculations. There is no math trickery. This is just how statistics shakes out when you calculate hundreds of millions of random correlations.
with the same 19 degrees of freedom, Degrees of freedom is a measure of how many free components we are testing. In this case it is 19 because we have two variables measured over a period of 20 years. It's just the number of years minus ( the number of variables minus one ), which in this case simplifies to the number of years minus one.
you would randomly expect to find a correlation as strong as this one.

[ 0.88, 0.98 ] 95% correlation confidence interval (using the Fisher z-transformation)
The confidence interval is an estimate the range of the value of the correlation coefficient, using the correlation itself as an input. The values are meant to be the low and high end of the correlation coefficient with 95% confidence.

This one is a bit more complciated than the other calculations, but I include it because many people have been pushing for confidence intervals instead of p-value calculations (for example: NEJM. However, if you are dredging data, you can reliably find yourself in the 5%. That's my goal!


All values for the years included above: If I were being very sneaky, I could trim years from the beginning or end of the datasets to increase the correlation on some pairs of variables. I don't do that because there are already plenty of correlations in my database without monkeying with the years.

Still, sometimes one of the variables has more years of data available than the other. This page only shows the overlapping years. To see all the years, click on "See what else correlates with..." link above.
20032004200520062007200820092010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Burglaries in Kentucky (Burglary rate)632.2625.4634.1662.5655.9692.3692.6700.3750682.2598.5530.9509.1471.9461.1391.4348.1344.1289.9244.8
The number of photographers in Kentucky (Photographers)590680650650680620650760730770690610550470410400410330320290




Why this works

  1. Data dredging: I have 25,153 variables in my database. I compare all these variables against each other to find ones that randomly match up. That's 632,673,409 correlation calculations! This is called “data dredging.” Instead of starting with a hypothesis and testing it, I instead abused the data to see what correlations shake out. It’s a dangerous way to go about analysis, because any sufficiently large dataset will yield strong correlations completely at random.
  2. Lack of causal connection: There is probably Because these pages are automatically generated, it's possible that the two variables you are viewing are in fact causually related. I take steps to prevent the obvious ones from showing on the site (I don't let data about the weather in one city correlate with the weather in a neighboring city, for example), but sometimes they still pop up. If they are related, cool! You found a loophole.
    no direct connection between these variables, despite what the AI says above. This is exacerbated by the fact that I used "Years" as the base variable. Lots of things happen in a year that are not related to each other! Most studies would use something like "one person" in stead of "one year" to be the "thing" studied.
  3. Observations not independent: For many variables, sequential years are not independent of each other. If a population of people is continuously doing something every day, there is no reason to think they would suddenly change how they are doing that thing on January 1. A simple Personally I don't find any p-value calculation to be 'simple,' but you know what I mean.
    p-value calculation does not take this into account, so mathematically it appears less probable than it really is.




Try it yourself

You can calculate the values on this page on your own! Try running the Python code to see the calculation results. Step 1: Download and install Python on your computer.

Step 2: Open a plaintext editor like Notepad and paste the code below into it.

Step 3: Save the file as "calculate_correlation.py" in a place you will remember, like your desktop. Copy the file location to your clipboard. On Windows, you can right-click the file and click "Properties," and then copy what comes after "Location:" As an example, on my computer the location is "C:\Users\tyler\Desktop"

Step 4: Open a command line window. For example, by pressing start and typing "cmd" and them pressing enter.

Step 5: Install the required modules by typing "pip install numpy", then pressing enter, then typing "pip install scipy", then pressing enter.

Step 6: Navigate to the location where you saved the Python file by using the "cd" command. For example, I would type "cd C:\Users\tyler\Desktop" and push enter.

Step 7: Run the Python script by typing "python calculate_correlation.py"

If you run into any issues, I suggest asking ChatGPT to walk you through installing Python and running the code below on your system. Try this question:

"Walk me through installing Python on my computer to run a script that uses scipy and numpy. Go step-by-step and ask me to confirm before moving on. Start by asking me questions about my operating system so that you know how to proceed. Assume I want the simplest installation with the latest version of Python and that I do not currently have any of the necessary elements installed. Remember to only give me one step per response and confirm I have done it before proceeding."


# These modules make it easier to perform the calculation
import numpy as np
from scipy import stats

# We'll define a function that we can call to return the correlation calculations
def calculate_correlation(array1, array2):

    # Calculate Pearson correlation coefficient and p-value
    correlation, p_value = stats.pearsonr(array1, array2)

    # Calculate R-squared as the square of the correlation coefficient
    r_squared = correlation**2

    return correlation, r_squared, p_value

# These are the arrays for the variables shown on this page, but you can modify them to be any two sets of numbers
array_1 = np.array([632.2,625.4,634.1,662.5,655.9,692.3,692.6,700.3,750,682.2,598.5,530.9,509.1,471.9,461.1,391.4,348.1,344.1,289.9,244.8,])
array_2 = np.array([590,680,650,650,680,620,650,760,730,770,690,610,550,470,410,400,410,330,320,290,])
array_1_name = "Burglaries in Kentucky"
array_2_name = "The number of photographers in Kentucky"

# Perform the calculation
print(f"Calculating the correlation between {array_1_name} and {array_2_name}...")
correlation, r_squared, p_value = calculate_correlation(array_1, array_2)

# Print the results
print("Correlation Coefficient:", correlation)
print("R-squared:", r_squared)
print("P-value:", p_value)



Reuseable content

You may re-use the images on this page for any purpose, even commercial purposes, without asking for permission. The only requirement is that you attribute Tyler Vigen. Attribution can take many different forms. If you leave the "tylervigen.com" link in the image, that satisfies it just fine. If you remove it and move it to a footnote, that's fine too. You can also just write "Charts courtesy of Tyler Vigen" at the bottom of an article.

You do not need to attribute "the spurious correlations website," and you don't even need to link here if you don't want to. I don't gain anything from pageviews. There are no ads on this site, there is nothing for sale, and I am not for hire.

For the record, I am just one person. Tyler Vigen, he/him/his. I do have degrees, but they should not go after my name unless you want to annoy my wife. If that is your goal, then go ahead and cite me as "Tyler Vigen, A.A. A.A.S. B.A. J.D." Otherwise it is just "Tyler Vigen."

When spoken, my last name is pronounced "vegan," like I don't eat meat.

Full license details.
For more on re-use permissions, or to get a signed release form, see tylervigen.com/permission.

Download images for these variables:


View another random correlation

How fun was this correlation?

I'm grateful for your review!


Correlation ID: 2573 · Black Variable ID: 20093 · Red Variable ID: 8439
about · subscribe · emailme@tylervigen.com · twitter

CC BY 4.0